If I understand this correctly they're demonstrating a design comparable to a split-phase two cylinder 4 stroke, one cylinder does the intake and compression and the other piston does the ignition and exhaust. Here they're doing the same thing using two rotors instead of two pistons. The compression chamber (not shown) would be located in the area between the two rotors.
They definitely need a longer rise time on those cam seals. Check out the 'Olive Rotary Engine' design for comparison.
there is no compression cycle... the fuel mixture must be squished down into a very small area before it will even burn right..... the valves are too high impact and will fail eaisly.... and even in your animation, the intake happens and your fuel is in front of the "pump".. then after it passes the valve, it is suddenly behind it???? back to the drawing board
Seems this would be far less effective than the Wankel rotary.
cbremer83 1 month ago
*****
piespokladowy 1 year ago
If I understand this correctly they're demonstrating a design comparable to a split-phase two cylinder 4 stroke, one cylinder does the intake and compression and the other piston does the ignition and exhaust. Here they're doing the same thing using two rotors instead of two pistons. The compression chamber (not shown) would be located in the area between the two rotors.
They definitely need a longer rise time on those cam seals. Check out the 'Olive Rotary Engine' design for comparison.
Peopleunit 1 year ago
asshole
francisporters 1 year ago
there is no compression cycle... the fuel mixture must be squished down into a very small area before it will even burn right..... the valves are too high impact and will fail eaisly.... and even in your animation, the intake happens and your fuel is in front of the "pump".. then after it passes the valve, it is suddenly behind it???? back to the drawing board
calholli 1 year ago
Total Fail!
blurr360 2 years ago