Two airplanes, hitting two towers, and yet three towers collapsed. All three towers fell into their own basements, perfectly, and in a matter of seconds. It is certainly a matter that requires an elaborate and detailed inquiry, and not by politicians, but by professionals!
Ask yourself why the WTC2 spill shown here has been shaded orange in post-processing, taking out the yellow color. There are accurate videos of it out there.
is not thermite or thermate. That is pure and simple concrete and rebar fused together due to falling 100 stories, duh? I dont need a doctorate to see that. In addition, thermite or thermate when it burns doesnt keep metal rebar in its original shape, that at 1:14 is pure and simple GRAVITY. Seek the truth, truth seekers
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Watch aussiestormer's videos, people. He has some shots of the cutting being done. Jones is a dimbulb and long dsiscredited in the academic community. Gage knows crap about fires or thermite. I speak from experience. The stuff he shows at 0;35 is glass. You cxan tell by the way it transmits light. (It isn't glowing) There is no sign that the "meteorite" at 1:04 was ever molten. It has paper and carpetting stuck to it. It is CONCRETE and identifiable steel floor pans. Gage sucks.
yes at 45 degrees.,,Those torches were at the site when they were removing the steel to rescue people. iron Workers were shown cutting the beams all in a row.look at representive press for his videos.
You are grasping at straws blueshadow. They would not cut the massive steel beams with a torch at an angle because it would take considerably longer when time was of the essence and use a great deal more fuel. A torch would not leave behind massive dripping globs of metal that flowed down the sides of the columns either.
I am dumbfounded by your comment, obviously you have never cut a tree down, for that matter picked up a tree in the form of a book. Those columns that they show cut at a 40-45 degree angle were heavy, if I were 'cutting' them down for disposal, I would secure myself to the 'uphil' side of the thing I was trying to cut down, and cut high from the left to right at a down angle, so that gravity would assist in the heavy thing not falling into me and killing me. duh?
Two airplanes, hitting two towers, and yet three towers collapsed. All three towers fell into their own basements, perfectly, and in a matter of seconds. It is certainly a matter that requires an elaborate and detailed inquiry, and not by politicians, but by professionals!
landsker 2 years ago
Ask yourself why the WTC2 spill shown here has been shaded orange in post-processing, taking out the yellow color. There are accurate videos of it out there.
CACBCCCU 3 years ago
at 1:14 clearly what the good 'Doctor' describes
is not thermite or thermate. That is pure and simple concrete and rebar fused together due to falling 100 stories, duh? I dont need a doctorate to see that. In addition, thermite or thermate when it burns doesnt keep metal rebar in its original shape, that at 1:14 is pure and simple GRAVITY. Seek the truth, truth seekers
Monshnl 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Watch aussiestormer's videos, people. He has some shots of the cutting being done. Jones is a dimbulb and long dsiscredited in the academic community. Gage knows crap about fires or thermite. I speak from experience. The stuff he shows at 0;35 is glass. You cxan tell by the way it transmits light. (It isn't glowing) There is no sign that the "meteorite" at 1:04 was ever molten. It has paper and carpetting stuck to it. It is CONCRETE and identifiable steel floor pans. Gage sucks.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
Search for "Shermans Neckties"
blueshadow1996 4 years ago
yes at 45 degrees.,,Those torches were at the site when they were removing the steel to rescue people. iron Workers were shown cutting the beams all in a row.look at representive press for his videos.
blueshadow1996 4 years ago
Oxygen and acetylene. A cutting torch after the collapse used to remove steel for evidence.
blueshadow1996 4 years ago
You are grasping at straws blueshadow. They would not cut the massive steel beams with a torch at an angle because it would take considerably longer when time was of the essence and use a great deal more fuel. A torch would not leave behind massive dripping globs of metal that flowed down the sides of the columns either.
centrino105 4 years ago 2
gravity would not let the steel drip? I would say you r grasping at straws.
blueshadow1996 4 years ago
watch?v=-A7YG3F6imw
watch all 3 parts for the truth
aussiestormer 4 years ago
I am dumbfounded by your comment, obviously you have never cut a tree down, for that matter picked up a tree in the form of a book. Those columns that they show cut at a 40-45 degree angle were heavy, if I were 'cutting' them down for disposal, I would secure myself to the 'uphil' side of the thing I was trying to cut down, and cut high from the left to right at a down angle, so that gravity would assist in the heavy thing not falling into me and killing me. duh?
Monshnl 3 years ago