wow! what an amazing concept! I know it doesn't look good, but a machine that isn't sensitive to the weather and produce a high lift at low speed, that is worth looking into!
Ok, this is a very new spin on a very old idea. The old idea was very poorly executed and didn't fly at all. This on the other hand appears to be a break through on the scale of the Saturn V rocket. I wonder how well it would work in very low pressure environments (high altitudes or even the surface/atmosphere of Mars). Great job! I am truly impressed. 5 of 5 stars!.
It gets a remarkable amount of lift for how slow it's going. Looks more efficient than a helicopter. Good design. Looks like someone mounted my column house fan on a fuselage.
The right to keep and bear arms because people always want to patrol and monitor when removing freedoms one by one. someday we will all be gov. employees monitoring one another. I think the Soviet Union proved this to be a bad idea.
Very clever design,will make a brilliant aerial UAV. More companies are using UAV to see how projects are doing. A stable platform and slow flying ideal for filming and video, without the huge expense of a helicopter.
Wondering though if it could glide, in the event it lost power ???
Again its nice to see something new with a little imagination applied.
Yeah,another way for Government to pry into are private lifes.I can picture local townships checking up on us with one of these with an onboard camera to make sure we are not putting additions on the back of our homes without permits,or checking up on what we are doing period ! If I saw this thing flying over my home knowing it was the local township,out comes my 410 shot gun to shot the fucka down.If it's too high for a 410,I'd use something else,whatever I can use.America is no longer FREE.
@demmylowther SCARY. They make no secret of the fact that it's intent is "urban surveillance." Spying on citizens. Not enemies, but citizens in their homes and on the streets. I'd shoot it down like goose and stomp on the pieces.
If they want to make it into a full sizd aircraft (and keep the land gear config) they'll have to move thefront ones forward, and lower the rear, because realistically it wont be able to take the stress of that hard a lanxding
@TheCHRISintheMIX No its not, it flies on entirely different principals, and is far more stable and responsive at low speeds than any conventional aircraft. Aircraft like these do not have a stall speed, because so long as the fan is rotating, it will create a low pressure zone above the channel and produce lift.
The comments on here are almost as interesting as the aircraft itself. It's fascinating how many people choose to look at the limitations, rather than the possibilities of this design. I guess it takes a special kind of person to think 'what if' rather than 'what's the point'.
i cannot imagine what it means for a real plane to have a mass of few hundreds kgs atop of you rotating , also gyro effect, balancing for snow and ice.....and so on..
@RoboTekno Gliding is absolutely an option, and it can be at a much lower speed than a conventional aircraft. Its almost more similar to autorotation, because as the aircraft glides forward, the fan is freewheeling, which produces lift.
You know, there are a dozen weird concepts for new aircraft types that are supposedly full of advantages but which never get anywhere. Can you imagine this thing at full scale, the huge "mower reel" screaming around at high RPM, requiring perfect balance and tuning lest the bearings fail, a weld break, or a slight oscillation start? It could turn into a ball of scrap metal in seconds. You can't scale up the rigidity and speed you'd need.
@NVanWendy it supposedly flies at very low rpm's about 1000rpm, i believe. It's also supposed to be far more quiet than a helicopter. That's why it's first proposed use is surveillance.
A zeppelin would provide a steady lift and the fanwings could run down its sides to provide stable maneuvering with (what i think would be) IMMENSE energy savings in large scale freight transport.
I think most new technologies fall under the curse of "In a vaccumn" thinking. When i see a fanwing i see more than a new way to build a plane i see it being integrated into current systems to improve them.
I think this propulsion type would partner exceptionally well with a zeppelin type lift mechanism for ultra-heavy loads and large scale construction. A wind-proof Zeppelin is the pinnacle of efficiency.
Impossible to land safely if fuel runs out because planes have wings to keep them afloat if u lose power to the fan uh oh no more lift and it comes down, down, down til it goes SPLAT!!
That's open minded design for sure,congrats, but in a larger scale you should take some measures to avoid bird sucking, or else with so large active surface it would be a true flying mincer!
@cerveza55 depends on the type of state, doesn't it? Some states managed pretty nasty surveillance with no technological means to speak of, on the other hand politicians nowadays get ripped a new one for any potential data leak.
I like it, might make future flights cheaper and safer?
But when up-scaling it, have you thought about the birds? Looks like birds can get caught up in it easier since its bigger (when it is at a larger scale).
@burnrider2001 the point is that is will have higher lift at lower speed because the fan provides both thrust and lift. pulling air over the wing provides the same lift that you get with a normal wing moving at high speed
Very cool concept......but what happens with the engine dies. Both helicopters and planes can land dead stick. Unless this thing can change the pitch of it's blades............SPLAT!
Best use (once developed further) would be to scale it up, use gas turbine engines to power the rotors and use it to ship huge amounts of cargo. If it has "an unusually high lift" then what needs a lot of lift? Cargo carrying planes.
Electric power airplanes, cars boats etc is worthless until there is something 100x better than the battery. Batteries as we know them now is a joke for a power source.
@waheguru12345 You don't seem to understand what the pilot says at the beginning, the fanwing theoretically has very a very slow stall speed and good slow flight capabilities making it good for certain applications. Also, I imagine the fanwing would be much more efficient than the A380 due to the large wingtip vortexes created by faster jets wings.
@biggiginthesky Fifteen seconds on their website led me to this: "R&D is now establishing the ideal angle of attack to achieve maximum rpm. If the motor stops it will be disconnected from the rotor as it is in a helicopter. Wind-tunnel tests have shown a steady improvement in glide-autorotation. ...The glide angle will be steep (1:3 )but the actual descent speed will be low and rotor speed will be high enough to allow a good landing."
Fanwing FAQ says: "R&D is now establishing the ideal angle of attack to achieve maximum rpm. If the motor stops it will be disconnected from the rotor as it is in a helicopter. Wind-tunnel tests have shown a steady improvement in glide-autorotation. Practical proof was provided by engine failure during a test flight in 2004. The glide angle will be steep (1:3 )but the actual descent speed will be low and rotor speed will be high enough to allow a good landing."
Fanwing FAQ says: "R&D is now establishing the ideal angle of attack to achieve maximum rpm. If the motor stops it will be disconnected from the rotor as it is in a helicopter. Wind-tunnel tests have shown a steady improvement in glide-autorotation. Practical proof was provided by engine failure during a test flight in 2004. The glide angle will be steep (1:3 )but the actual descent speed will be low and rotor speed will be high enough to allow a good landing."
Fanwing FAQ says: "R&D is now establishing the ideal angle of attack to achieve maximum rpm. If the motor stops it will be disconnected from the rotor as it is in a helicopter. Wind-tunnel tests have shown a steady improvement in glide-autorotation. Practical proof was provided by engine failure during a test flight in 2004. The glide angle will be steep (1:3 )but the actual descent speed will be low and rotor speed will be high enough to allow a good landing."
@biggiginthesky gotta wonder that. Maybe if it has a sprag clutch like a helicopter- it could "autorotate" sort of, allowing for Magnus effect from the rotor in a glide like situation.
If I had to guess, I'd say no (or at least not as much as a traditional winged craft) just because the difference in air pressure, from what I can tell ( I could be totally wrong) is exclusively dependent on the fan, not the shape of the wing. Maybe if the fan could have very, very small friction and they would continue to spin then it might displace enough air to keep it aloft for a small while.
@biggiginthesky I'm not the designer, but if you notice, the wing presents a more or less standard airfoil. Therefore the plane should glide power off. Glide ratio would be contingent on wing load.
...really, urban surveilance, huh?...if that "thing" falls into my backyard, it's MINE; and it would cost them 'bout $500 (U.S. dollars) to get it back...depending on what they're surveying on---I'm DEAD SERIOUS!
err no its not. it has a fixed wing. the fan is for propulsion not lift. if the engine stopped airspeed is created by a nose down angle of attack letting gravity do the work. air over the wing creates lift. exactly what the polar curve would be like is unknown. but it looked pretty level in normal flight i.e not nose high engine dependant so i'd guess not too bad.
But the profile of the wing is generated by the rotating fan. If that stops, then there is no profile to hold the plane in the air. The fan will act as a giant wind brake instead and cause the plane to drop.
traffic surveillance, military reconnaissance, aerial photography, science e.g. animal tracking & counting, advertising e.g. pulling banners behind, meteorology and the list goes on
I'd hope that a production version would include a clutch (or Bendix drive?) so that the rotors could spin freely if the engine stops - allowing its version of autorotation.
Lets not forget; Alexander Chessin & Serge Trey!
FuLLeFFekT1 2 months ago
A.M. Lippisch & Dr. F.K. Kirsten would be proud!!
FuLLeFFekT1 2 months ago
I wonder, what would be the glide ratio of that aircraft once the engine stops...
leqo12 3 months ago
@leqo12 about 1:3 but it is fully capable of an auto-rotational landing
1206549 2 months ago
i want to see a life size one + birdstrike on camera LOL
fast86gti 3 months ago
wow! what an amazing concept! I know it doesn't look good, but a machine that isn't sensitive to the weather and produce a high lift at low speed, that is worth looking into!
JacobANielsen 3 months ago
Ok, this is a very new spin on a very old idea. The old idea was very poorly executed and didn't fly at all. This on the other hand appears to be a break through on the scale of the Saturn V rocket. I wonder how well it would work in very low pressure environments (high altitudes or even the surface/atmosphere of Mars). Great job! I am truly impressed. 5 of 5 stars!.
lunageologist 3 months ago
Can it glide?
fubleduck 4 months ago
@fubleduck no but it can do an autor-otational landing
1206549 2 months ago
now planes can harvest crops as well as spray pesticides and fertilizer
beer94 6 months ago 2
wow that is increadible!!!
Hungrystudent101 7 months ago
Keep it away from the GRASS!!!!
nagrom355 7 months ago
This makes the barstool go cart look rather pedestrian.
JohnLeePedimore 7 months ago
There is videos of this type fanwing from the 1950's and earlier.
who invented it?
Ibringthetruth1 8 months ago
It gets a remarkable amount of lift for how slow it's going. Looks more efficient than a helicopter. Good design. Looks like someone mounted my column house fan on a fuselage.
twonulator 8 months ago
Few questions:
- Does the fanwing create a gyroscopic effect?
- Can it travel at high speed as well? Or is it strictly low-speed?
- How is the efficiency of this aircraft when compared to helicopters or other airplanes?
McFuckNuggets 9 months ago
Would be a good design for crop dusting, low stall speed and less likely to be suceptible to wind shear.
gwgn02 9 months ago
The right to keep and bear arms because people always want to patrol and monitor when removing freedoms one by one. someday we will all be gov. employees monitoring one another. I think the Soviet Union proved this to be a bad idea.
TheAbelinkin 10 months ago
Doesn't she look so excited xD And she said her name so fast :/
rahulras 10 months ago
Hey_ãNýõNÈ_wáNÑÁ_chat_with_më_Í_fèêl_sÒ_loNËlý_tÖdÅy♬
KittyaaRudyaa582 11 months ago
njoyed this great movie in web movie tube
santinasiford05 1 year ago
It's cool, but do we really need to try and reinvent the mouse trap?
Looks like you just put an enormous gyro in the pitch axis.
leafyP 1 year ago
I wanna see a FanWing Helicopter type contraption.
Teabahgeue 1 year ago
@Teabahgeue lookup "cyclo-gyro"
edcoondog 11 months ago
Patrol city streets? Ummmm no thank you. Hello 4th Amendment!
justdfactsmaam 1 year ago
Would a Flettner wing work? Rather like those Flettner ships but with the tubes horizontal like the fan wings here.
jonzflicks 1 year ago
Very clever design,will make a brilliant aerial UAV. More companies are using UAV to see how projects are doing. A stable platform and slow flying ideal for filming and video, without the huge expense of a helicopter.
Wondering though if it could glide, in the event it lost power ???
Again its nice to see something new with a little imagination applied.
Mike
Tailwindsurfer 1 year ago
not used to the grass? the grass is its natural habitat
Jpwnage216 1 year ago
well your screwed if the motor stops cause that is half of your lift in this design. It would be way cool to build on of those.
RCvehicleGuy 1 year ago
@RCvehicleGuy it can do auto-rotation like a helicopter
1206549 2 months ago
cool
DarthSchwartz 1 year ago
Yeah,another way for Government to pry into are private lifes.I can picture local townships checking up on us with one of these with an onboard camera to make sure we are not putting additions on the back of our homes without permits,or checking up on what we are doing period ! If I saw this thing flying over my home knowing it was the local township,out comes my 410 shot gun to shot the fucka down.If it's too high for a 410,I'd use something else,whatever I can use.America is no longer FREE.
demmylowther 1 year ago
@demmylowther SCARY. They make no secret of the fact that it's intent is "urban surveillance." Spying on citizens. Not enemies, but citizens in their homes and on the streets. I'd shoot it down like goose and stomp on the pieces.
seven7arrows 1 year ago
Id hate to get my fingers stuck in that thing....
loveskullz411 1 year ago
If they want to make it into a full sizd aircraft (and keep the land gear config) they'll have to move thefront ones forward, and lower the rear, because realistically it wont be able to take the stress of that hard a lanxding
trainguy3 1 year ago
Wild!
1971SuperLead 1 year ago
ok we got a wing under that rotating motor, so that thing must hover very good. think its a coanda effect why this plane will fly so stable, isnt it?
SuperCrashpilot 1 year ago
i think its autorotaded like an helicopter, when motor is dead? is that right?
SuperCrashpilot 1 year ago
i feel bad for the birds
gootch420 1 year ago
lol, if that became a REAL airplane i would NEVER EVER fly with it.
its just a plane with a huge lawn-mover on top of it. its suicide
TheCHRISintheMIX 1 year ago
@TheCHRISintheMIX No its not, it flies on entirely different principals, and is far more stable and responsive at low speeds than any conventional aircraft. Aircraft like these do not have a stall speed, because so long as the fan is rotating, it will create a low pressure zone above the channel and produce lift.
NelielTuOderswank 1 year ago
The comments on here are almost as interesting as the aircraft itself. It's fascinating how many people choose to look at the limitations, rather than the possibilities of this design. I guess it takes a special kind of person to think 'what if' rather than 'what's the point'.
KamikazeElvis 1 year ago 15
wondeful Idea
MrAataghi 1 year ago
wow, would not have believed it if I had not seen it, that is really something
cadude145 1 year ago
Really awesome...
allaboutgliders 1 year ago
i cannot imagine what it means for a real plane to have a mass of few hundreds kgs atop of you rotating , also gyro effect, balancing for snow and ice.....and so on..
GRATZIANI2002 1 year ago
I'm sure when you loose power, gliding is not an option?
RoboTekno 1 year ago
@RoboTekno Gliding is absolutely an option, and it can be at a much lower speed than a conventional aircraft. Its almost more similar to autorotation, because as the aircraft glides forward, the fan is freewheeling, which produces lift.
NelielTuOderswank 1 year ago
Какве наказе...? Јел их није срамота да се јавно појаве?
ZoranM001 1 year ago
Large scale protective intake screens a must
Imagine a 90 thousand RPM bird vac
Pieces would fly
How does it favor in rain or snow ?
Nice concept though
KDEngineering 1 year ago
I saw the amateur video of the simulated fanwing. But my god. I CAN'T BELIEVE IT FLIES!!!!!!. That is so amazing.
airlinerdude12 1 year ago
looks like a lawn mover upside down.
domisollafa 1 year ago
You know, there are a dozen weird concepts for new aircraft types that are supposedly full of advantages but which never get anywhere. Can you imagine this thing at full scale, the huge "mower reel" screaming around at high RPM, requiring perfect balance and tuning lest the bearings fail, a weld break, or a slight oscillation start? It could turn into a ball of scrap metal in seconds. You can't scale up the rigidity and speed you'd need.
NVanWendy 1 year ago
@NVanWendy it supposedly flies at very low rpm's about 1000rpm, i believe. It's also supposed to be far more quiet than a helicopter. That's why it's first proposed use is surveillance.
vealicle1 9 months ago
i've always wanted a flying lawnmower
ppeerrssoonnnn 1 year ago
You wouldn't want to get your fingers caught in it. :-)
Boosteroid 1 year ago
@Boosteroid neither would you want to get your head stuck in a jet engine.
Scwirul 1 year ago
In power-out situation, does the fan auto-rotate due to forward momentum to provide a gradual descent?
thepaperlantern 1 year ago
@thepaperlantern i think this is why they should stick to small scale.
airlinerdude12 1 year ago
A zeppelin would provide a steady lift and the fanwings could run down its sides to provide stable maneuvering with (what i think would be) IMMENSE energy savings in large scale freight transport.
I think most new technologies fall under the curse of "In a vaccumn" thinking. When i see a fanwing i see more than a new way to build a plane i see it being integrated into current systems to improve them.
masterfulninja 1 year ago
I think this propulsion type would partner exceptionally well with a zeppelin type lift mechanism for ultra-heavy loads and large scale construction. A wind-proof Zeppelin is the pinnacle of efficiency.
masterfulninja 1 year ago
Impossible to land safely if fuel runs out because planes have wings to keep them afloat if u lose power to the fan uh oh no more lift and it comes down, down, down til it goes SPLAT!!
Think about that would u
Atomintercom 1 year ago
This design could potentially allow to regulate lift generated by each wing without using ailerons - just by changin rotation speed.
teanor2 1 year ago
That's open minded design for sure,congrats, but in a larger scale you should take some measures to avoid bird sucking, or else with so large active surface it would be a true flying mincer!
08I80 1 year ago
This is really neat, but the last thing we need is more surveillance propagated by politicians fear-mongering.
cerveza55 1 year ago
@cerveza55 depends on the type of state, doesn't it? Some states managed pretty nasty surveillance with no technological means to speak of, on the other hand politicians nowadays get ripped a new one for any potential data leak.
SalsaTiger83 1 year ago
they should make a helicopter version with machine guns on both axes!
folypers 1 year ago
I like it, might make future flights cheaper and safer?
But when up-scaling it, have you thought about the birds? Looks like birds can get caught up in it easier since its bigger (when it is at a larger scale).
PotatoeFreak 2 years ago
When it took ok it really seemed to create near-instantaneous lift. It is more stable in wind, light weight variants will be safer and more stable.
mae951 2 years ago
You better have a reliable powerplant, and an accurate fuel gauge. Would make a good platform for a complete aircraft parachute.
RocketBurn11 2 years ago
Move the front landing wheels a bit forward, possibly.
mowgli2071 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
proof of moore alien technology from crashed UFO
datzfast 2 years ago
@datzfast lol wtf how would alien spacecraft even get to earth with this 'alien technology'?
there is no air in space for the fans to slice through and get thrust, to move in space you need rockets...
jonathanmarvin 2 years ago
surely you jest...lol
an alien craft coming from light years away wont fly like a horizontal tower fan..
1320crusier 2 years ago
you guys really think that this thing will get off the ground with 2 lbs of payload? thats alot for such a slow moving plane.
burnrider2001 2 years ago 2
2 kilos=4.4 lb.
heatherrose2006 2 years ago
even better for my argument.... not 2lbs but instead its 4.4
burnrider2001 2 years ago
@burnrider2001 the point is that is will have higher lift at lower speed because the fan provides both thrust and lift. pulling air over the wing provides the same lift that you get with a normal wing moving at high speed
lighteningflash7 2 years ago
Seems worthless to me.
Maybe it could be a cheap quiet drone, but probably nothing more.
UBERGRIMKVLT 2 years ago
I'm sure people said the same to Frank Whittle
NuguSmedley 2 years ago
@burnrider2001
it's lift doesn't depend so much on horizontal speed,
that's the whole point of this design.
teanor2 1 year ago
Very cool concept......but what happens with the engine dies. Both helicopters and planes can land dead stick. Unless this thing can change the pitch of it's blades............SPLAT!
RogerPriceDesigns 2 years ago
I've heard of the flying lawnmower, but not the flying harvester, lol, this is awesome :-)
Skydive4ever 2 years ago 2
nice stuff.
cippergut 2 years ago
Best use (once developed further) would be to scale it up, use gas turbine engines to power the rotors and use it to ship huge amounts of cargo. If it has "an unusually high lift" then what needs a lot of lift? Cargo carrying planes.
yesiamanalien 2 years ago
agreed
youlilkitty 2 years ago
Comment removed
envisage150 2 years ago
Electric power airplanes, cars boats etc is worthless until there is something 100x better than the battery. Batteries as we know them now is a joke for a power source.
rb5235 2 years ago
good rc pilot
mattman1515 2 years ago
Comment removed
waheguru12345 2 years ago
the idea is that its going to go slow - idiot. who said its designed to be as fast as a jet?
liambaron 2 years ago
@waheguru12345 You don't seem to understand what the pilot says at the beginning, the fanwing theoretically has very a very slow stall speed and good slow flight capabilities making it good for certain applications. Also, I imagine the fanwing would be much more efficient than the A380 due to the large wingtip vortexes created by faster jets wings.
RCexperimental 2 years ago
Would like to ask the designer.
In a power-out situation, does it still glides?
Please answer.
Thanks,
biggiginthesky 2 years ago 45
@biggiginthesky The engine autorotates like a helicopter and it provides enough lift for a more or less controlled landing.
kjr23 1 year ago
@biggiginthesky The engine autorotates like a helicopter and it provides enough lift for a more or less controlled landing.
kjr23 1 year ago
@biggiginthesky Fifteen seconds on their website led me to this: "R&D is now establishing the ideal angle of attack to achieve maximum rpm. If the motor stops it will be disconnected from the rotor as it is in a helicopter. Wind-tunnel tests have shown a steady improvement in glide-autorotation. ...The glide angle will be steep (1:3 )but the actual descent speed will be low and rotor speed will be high enough to allow a good landing."
fraidknot 1 year ago
@biggiginthesky
Fanwing FAQ says: "R&D is now establishing the ideal angle of attack to achieve maximum rpm. If the motor stops it will be disconnected from the rotor as it is in a helicopter. Wind-tunnel tests have shown a steady improvement in glide-autorotation. Practical proof was provided by engine failure during a test flight in 2004. The glide angle will be steep (1:3 )but the actual descent speed will be low and rotor speed will be high enough to allow a good landing."
tempelritter007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggiginthesky
Fanwing FAQ says: "R&D is now establishing the ideal angle of attack to achieve maximum rpm. If the motor stops it will be disconnected from the rotor as it is in a helicopter. Wind-tunnel tests have shown a steady improvement in glide-autorotation. Practical proof was provided by engine failure during a test flight in 2004. The glide angle will be steep (1:3 )but the actual descent speed will be low and rotor speed will be high enough to allow a good landing."
tempelritter007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggiginthesky
Fanwing FAQ says: "R&D is now establishing the ideal angle of attack to achieve maximum rpm. If the motor stops it will be disconnected from the rotor as it is in a helicopter. Wind-tunnel tests have shown a steady improvement in glide-autorotation. Practical proof was provided by engine failure during a test flight in 2004. The glide angle will be steep (1:3 )but the actual descent speed will be low and rotor speed will be high enough to allow a good landing."
tempelritter007 1 year ago
@biggiginthesky Will just glide, with the fan freewheeling.
NelielTuOderswank 1 year ago
Comment removed
edcoondog 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggiginthesky gotta wonder that. Maybe if it has a sprag clutch like a helicopter- it could "autorotate" sort of, allowing for Magnus effect from the rotor in a glide like situation.
edcoondog 11 months ago
@biggiginthesky parachute at the head 2 ends of the wings and the tail.
leereturn2006 10 months ago
@biggiginthesky it glides totaly fine in a power out situation , like every normal brick .
BlackPsychoNonick 9 months ago
@biggiginthesky
If I had to guess, I'd say no (or at least not as much as a traditional winged craft) just because the difference in air pressure, from what I can tell ( I could be totally wrong) is exclusively dependent on the fan, not the shape of the wing. Maybe if the fan could have very, very small friction and they would continue to spin then it might displace enough air to keep it aloft for a small while.
mkifyousayso 9 months ago
@biggiginthesky I'm not the designer, but if you notice, the wing presents a more or less standard airfoil. Therefore the plane should glide power off. Glide ratio would be contingent on wing load.
Sealy57 8 months ago
HAHA WELSH!
ioan21121221 2 years ago
still awesome for a model aircraft training.
would be good for like a air cargo or air ambulance perhaps like a piper cub can take off across the airstrip :)
and cheaper than a helicopter :)
rommelfcc 2 years ago
...really, urban surveilance, huh?...if that "thing" falls into my backyard, it's MINE; and it would cost them 'bout $500 (U.S. dollars) to get it back...depending on what they're surveying on---I'm DEAD SERIOUS!
fambothexterminator 2 years ago
Да все ништяк, пацаны!
edik1952 2 years ago
ага, не парьтесь, пацаны %)
L0nelyDrag0n 2 years ago
Won't ever be used to carry humans due to it falling like a rock if there is any engine trouble.
lectrick 2 years ago
You mean like a helicopter? Because they carry humans.
Forshbr04 2 years ago
Touché!
lectrick 2 years ago
Helicopters don't fall like rocks at engine failures.. search for "auto-rotation"
much like when u cut a plastic cup's side in many sheets and let it fall from a building; it spins down at a slower descent rate
PedroLoyola 2 years ago 3
That's true, but the survival rate of helicopters with engine failures is much lower than that of fixed wing aircraft.
Forshbr04 2 years ago
true..
PedroLoyola 2 years ago
This is not a helicopter. It is going to fall like a brick if the engine stalls.
TirianB 2 years ago
err no its not. it has a fixed wing. the fan is for propulsion not lift. if the engine stopped airspeed is created by a nose down angle of attack letting gravity do the work. air over the wing creates lift. exactly what the polar curve would be like is unknown. but it looked pretty level in normal flight i.e not nose high engine dependant so i'd guess not too bad.
FCbisleybob 2 years ago
But the profile of the wing is generated by the rotating fan. If that stops, then there is no profile to hold the plane in the air. The fan will act as a giant wind brake instead and cause the plane to drop.
TirianB 2 years ago
TirianB, yes sir.
pelagic6 2 years ago
they said its designed for UAVs
BuffaloWarrior7 2 years ago 3
Definitely innovative, well done!
LTF85199 2 years ago 2
Well that works good!
RCSuperPowers 3 years ago
where i can see the especificatios of engine ? is brushless? abaout of the batery what type of batery? please......tanks
catfcatf 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why do you want to know?
BuffaloWarrior7 2 years ago
Is it quiet? I see great potential for this craft as a Military UAV, but only if it can be silent, and the previous comment on wether it can hover...
Whiskeytango26 3 years ago
silence isnt really That important in a UAV as they are far enough away that almost any electric propulsion system cannot be heard.
Craig9080 2 years ago
i like it!
vanepico 3 years ago
That was an extremely short take off!
Odziz 3 years ago 4
Interesting stuff! I wonder how are these systems affected by rain?
Ogsonofgroo 3 years ago 13
Can the fans be configured so as to provide hovering ability. A Fancopter, perhaps?
mekkler 3 years ago
Congratulations, an awesome idea with a huge potential. Keep at it and it sure will become a great success in many different applications!
theoriginaldanidor 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what would it be used for?
mordoringer 3 years ago 4
traffic surveillance, military reconnaissance, aerial photography, science e.g. animal tracking & counting, advertising e.g. pulling banners behind, meteorology and the list goes on
theoriginaldanidor 3 years ago
I see :)
rrreger 3 years ago
Looks awesome! I wonder how good can it fly-land if the engine stops, is it safer than usual planes?
rrreger 3 years ago
I'd hope that a production version would include a clutch (or Bendix drive?) so that the rotors could spin freely if the engine stops - allowing its version of autorotation.
stereoroid 3 years ago