last time i check...the screen suppost to be iegther vertical or horozontal...i told my friend 18 years ago that this 3D crap will be out and he did not believed me...we are proffessional lenticular designers....the whole technology needs to be re-invented...but everybody is going off the old blue print...its really crapy ...but if buying 3D tv some how excites customers ..then i guest mission accomplished.
you need a vertically interlaced stereoscopic image, and place the lens over it, such that the bumps align with the columns of the image. the columns in the lens should be exactly the same width as one pixel on your screen (or maybe half a pixel, i'm not sure?)
The technology does exist &work though.Nintendo's shown success on the 3DS device with their 3D tech without glasses (shown at E3)
_
I'm excited with the prospect of turning any screen into a 3D viewing device(especially iPhone),without the need for glasses.Hopefully also reducing side-effects such as diziness,headaches or disorientation that 3D can cause
_
So maybe this technology doesn't translate well in a recording,& will probably be more obvious in real life
wazabee has a similar thing where it's like a case + glass on top. the downsides are that the touch sensitivity won't work with this (in their model there was a small opening below) and also a very limited number of applications.
sooo which pixel is the phone ?
nukeshockhybrid 2 months ago
Were did you get that lenticular picture?
Tj13ray 6 months ago
last time i check...the screen suppost to be iegther vertical or horozontal...i told my friend 18 years ago that this 3D crap will be out and he did not believed me...we are proffessional lenticular designers....the whole technology needs to be re-invented...but everybody is going off the old blue print...its really crapy ...but if buying 3D tv some how excites customers ..then i guest mission accomplished.
diamony123 6 months ago
i wasted 42 sec of my life!
magical0ivy 6 months ago
This is clearly the future of portable entertainment.
requiett 8 months ago
I think im high
Khameleon808 8 months ago
mit 240p erkennt man ungefähr gar nichts, is der gleiche Effekt als wenn ich die Augen geschlossen hätte.
ArnoldClover 11 months ago
you need a vertically interlaced stereoscopic image, and place the lens over it, such that the bumps align with the columns of the image. the columns in the lens should be exactly the same width as one pixel on your screen (or maybe half a pixel, i'm not sure?)
boukeversteegh 1 year ago 4
I can't see any 3D here
_
The technology does exist &work though.Nintendo's shown success on the 3DS device with their 3D tech without glasses (shown at E3)
_
I'm excited with the prospect of turning any screen into a 3D viewing device(especially iPhone),without the need for glasses.Hopefully also reducing side-effects such as diziness,headaches or disorientation that 3D can cause
_
So maybe this technology doesn't translate well in a recording,& will probably be more obvious in real life
pitykid 1 year ago
@pitykid you wont see 3d unless your monitor has a lenticular display otherwise its the same old thing
killerdesouza 1 year ago
i dont even know what the fuck im looking, everythings blurry as shit
StackCityEntOfficial 1 year ago 23
Very interesting - What was the pitch (lpi) of the lens you used? How come the lens is diagonal? What advantage does this give?
Howseography 2 years ago
How can i made those lenticular lens?
NeMewSys4 2 years ago
wazabee has a similar thing where it's like a case + glass on top. the downsides are that the touch sensitivity won't work with this (in their model there was a small opening below) and also a very limited number of applications.
yuriythebest 2 years ago