This guy spends 3 to 6 hours a night studying, and he's still completely clueless. I can only imagine the level of stupidity at work in the empty cavity between his ears, that spending that much time studying only leads to further ignorance. Congratulations dude, you are one of the dumbest people on YouTube.
That's the problem right there. You're using a computer and the internet to get information. If you actually went to a library and looked at a biology book, you will find the SCIENTIFIC evidence you say doesn't exist. You will see peer reviewed documents from these "evolutionists" you say that don't believe in evolution.
Neph, do yourself a favour, try getting your information from a source that has editors and peers reviewing it before making it public.
What does this have to do with confirmation bias? Are you actually trying to address my video? Or are you just using t to try and squeeze out some hits from my popularity?
You might want to quit switching back and forth between evolution (as it applies to biological things) Big Bang cosmology. I would help. There are anomalous red-shifted objects that appear associated with galaxies. It is however a problem for the nature of quasars, but is not likely to alter our age of the universe, as there are galaxies out to 13 Billion light years. If there is another source for red-shift in the anomalous objects that would be interesting, but it doesn't give us a 6000yr Uni
there's no fucking way an intelligent being designed you buddy.
Forcefield23 5 months ago
This guy spends 3 to 6 hours a night studying, and he's still completely clueless. I can only imagine the level of stupidity at work in the empty cavity between his ears, that spending that much time studying only leads to further ignorance. Congratulations dude, you are one of the dumbest people on YouTube.
DeusExAstra 11 months ago
conserve-o-pedia is not a souce!
SecureGuitar 1 year ago
That's the problem right there. You're using a computer and the internet to get information. If you actually went to a library and looked at a biology book, you will find the SCIENTIFIC evidence you say doesn't exist. You will see peer reviewed documents from these "evolutionists" you say that don't believe in evolution.
Neph, do yourself a favour, try getting your information from a source that has editors and peers reviewing it before making it public.
And FYI, it does pass the science method.
tommy605 1 year ago
this has to be a wind up.
absoluteIyflabulous 1 year ago
what about the fact that the fossil record proves evolution and its all recorded in genes and the laws of physics prove it happens too???
AEVautomatic 1 year ago
What does this have to do with confirmation bias? Are you actually trying to address my video? Or are you just using t to try and squeeze out some hits from my popularity?
AntiCitizenX 1 year ago
You might want to quit switching back and forth between evolution (as it applies to biological things) Big Bang cosmology. I would help. There are anomalous red-shifted objects that appear associated with galaxies. It is however a problem for the nature of quasars, but is not likely to alter our age of the universe, as there are galaxies out to 13 Billion light years. If there is another source for red-shift in the anomalous objects that would be interesting, but it doesn't give us a 6000yr Uni
MsMrNoface 1 year ago