I have no problems understanding why they scrapped this program: Look at the amount of junk it produces - junk that will be there as a threat to future launches. And all that junk cost money. We need to rethink the whole approach to space travel.
I think to visit mars will be very hard, nasa & jpl and all the private space industries should work global with everyone together to achieve the following steps.
1. International Moon Station (Getting the knowledge for setting-up one on mars)
2. New Technologies tested in Space for Deep Space Missions
to go much cheaper, faster and saver
3. New LaunchPad/Solution in Space/from the Moon
+ new much more efficient (in costs & speed) Propulsion
4. International Mars Station. Local Launch System.
@luisr12491 Really ? You don't remember it was Cheney/Bush2 who cancelled the shuttle and delayed the Orion project until it was late and way over budget ? Yea, I bet you vote Republican too.
Obama's a retard for cancelling nasa's spaceship program. but they got back.they made a game with ALL the info from 10000 light years away.boy, he got pissed.
fucking nigger destroys NASA budget and manned spaceflight, humanity cant survive on this planet forever, we need to go into space, well thats what happens when u elect a black, everything goes to shit
@CryptWarrior69 before bashing a president based on his skin color, look into what's going on first. The Constellation program was cancelled, but they now have a new program. The Orion spacecraft WILL still be used, and it will take humans to an asteroid by 2020s and to Mars by the 2030s. Cheers.
@TheBurmanUnicorn u dumb ass because he canceled the constallation project i bet u 100% other presidents will cancel the asteroid project because of money it is at our worst time to not give up and obama gave up fuck him
@srblackbird1 Armstrong disagrees, true, but that doesn't mean anything? Is he God, or something? And besides, Buzz Aldrin and former directors do support Obama.
@TheBurmanUnicorn if u respect the first person to ever walk on the moon than u will know the director gets fired if he dissagres with obama obama is a fuckin tool that's why he is not going to be reelected promises things he cant deliver already because he passed a bill 2 years ago more people are out of jobs than in fuck u and him
@srblackbird1 Sure. In that case, I have nothing else to hear from you. I have done nothing but talk to you with respect- if you're going to troll around with your attitude, I'd rather hear from someone more educated and respectful.
@srblackbird1 oh and also, budget cuts WILL have to be made, with the current financial condition. I agree he should have made cuts from the defense budget though, but Obama space policy isn't wrong as well.
@srblackbird1 And besides, who knows how the financial condition of the US will be 10 years from now? It won't probably be canceled. There is a good chance that the country will recover.
@srblackbird1 Really? Is that what you do? Bring profanity into the conversation, and insult a random stranger just because you're safe behind your pc?
I no fan of Obama but he was right to cancel this program. Spacex is light years ahead with their Falcon 9 /Dragon launch vehicle and spacecraft than NASA was going to be in 6 or 7 years.
Ne higgyen senki a NASA-nak!Hazudnak!Soha nem mondtak igazat!De eljött végre az emberek ideje!Nem vagyunk állatok!Jogunk van az igazsághoz!Ami kezdődik abban milliók vesznek részt!És tanulja meg végre minden álszent szervezet: EMBER NEM LEHET AZ EMBEREK URA!!!!
You can thank The Bankers for the thwarted efforts to get anywhere soon. Those greedy bastards and there rip off tax payer funded - Boom and Bust system - is why it will take forever to get anywhere in the Cosmos...
NASA has made a career out of cancelled programs. Hmmm, let me see. The US doesn't even have a manned space program any longer, does it? thank you President Obama for cancelling the manned space program after 40 years. Bravo!
@cyanman123 That's what the Soyuz has been doing for years however it isn't pretty. Instead of using airbags it uses explosions to slow it down. On an ideal landing it's something like hitting the ground going 30mph.
If Mir was such garbage, then how come that the Russian Zvezda and Zarya modules of the ISS are basically Mir-components?
And those prototypes are not human-rated.. Well, the Orion is, but there's no rocket for it to fly on. If the US could go there themselves, they wouldn't be paying Russia, it's that simple.
@MrDarkZodiak Ya but our debt makes it obvious the money is used for the secret space and plantary gaurd with bases in the earths hollow center, pulling energy from the core vortex star to ruin reality by manipulating all atoms to fart awareness just after taco time....Im high, Tacos are its Creator in seperate duality. obama
1957 first satellite,1962 first man in the space,1970 The first robot lunar rover on the moon,1986 Mir first space station,2011 Russians the only ones who can get to ISS.
I'm glad this program was canceled; it was a giant leap backwards in space travel and would have cost more than the entire history of the space program put together. Developing the space plane is the way to go forward; it combines all of the shuttle program technology into one vehicle.
With LVs like Ares V and Energia, it is possible to loft 150+ tonnes to LEO. What this means is we can send an entire Lunar Outpost consisting of separate modules for crew quarters, science lab, greenhouse, fuel tanks, batteries, solar panel farms and even a small nuclear reactor for emergency and a couple of rovers all in one shot or may be 2-3 shots, depending upon the size of each module. Though it might be safer to do it in bits to avoid losing the whole thing in case of LV failure.
Its amazing how massively big Ares1 actually is compared to the size of its payload it actually puts into LEO. It needs to be a heavy lift rocket system (which adds major cost) because of its escape system must be gigantic to have a chance at survival. That is because NASA insists on using a Shuttle SRB which is a design failure. Escaping from an SRB failure is exponentially more difficult to do than a liquid fueled rocket failure.
@tomanyasses alright, no need to sware (you typical american, who reads halve a book and decides that they understand the subject). I was talking about a TENTH not ten times, can you not read a short comment, a tenth everyone knows about the fact that you cant travel faster than the speed of light. If you don't already know I am refering to the matter anti-matter engines which could go at a TENTH of the speed of light. In your own words 'dumb shit'
This is bullshit NASA is covering up 80% of the information that the public doesn't want to know - Go onto "YOUTUBE N WATCH DR STEVEN GREER EXPLAINS THE TRUTH BEHIND ALL OF THIS!!
Part II | Space Science - Cosmology - Exobiology - theoretical physics - Geometric Topology - knot theory : Diversity ( mathematical ) i.e. is not like the Euclidean space (Hyperbolic geometry - Hyper Space) and also equipped with the properties would have to transform themselves into other objects, similar to knot theory. Ponds matter and force particles = theory of SUSY = Dark matter ?
Part I |Space Science - Cosmology - Exobiology - theoretical physics- Geometric Topology - knot theory : Room = order model ,structure = present amount, homeomorphism = transformation of an object (topologically equivalent) as a mathematical hypothesis would be collected : Elementary - (SUSY) would have the following characteristics - Syntactic Reversibility - transformation is not only limited in alternating two objects .
The CEV is quite similar in concept to the Apollo craft, but significantly larger and more modern. Modern computers allow the command module to be self-guided allowing the full crew of up to 6 to descend to the lunar surface for potentially one to two weeks and the payload space is good enough to allow for development of rudimentary lunar bases which future missions could inhabit. No way apollo would be able to build a PERMANENT SETTLEMENT ON THE MOON.
Can someone help me out with this? I've just recorded it today and have no idea what it is but it looks interesting. And No it's not an airplane btw. Read the discription /watch?v=acIBkj-8Rz4
uhmmm... you're saying that NASA was simply going to duplicate the Apollo space craft... and mission? I support space exploration but I can see why this would be on the chopping block. I can't even see a reason to have a manned mission to mars. I think a self sustaining space station should be a the top of the list.
@unambitious partly agree partly disagree. yes its not a priority to simply re create the Apollo's. The objective behind the mission was not the same though it was more focused on long term living (i.e. 6months) with the new technology's they are developing (e.g. some dude has managed to extract water from 'moon dust' which is silica-hydroxide based glasses). A maned mission to mars i guess is an extension of this - all places we need to persue for future but i agree with the space station.
As long as we have to burn 1000tons of matter to get 3/6tons to orbit i feel hardly urged to call it a spaceship as i would just catastrofically fool myself and lie, just as nasa does by promising spacecrafts and still offers washingmachines.
Why do we still call it a spacecraft? As long as a vehicle doesnt have the power to self sufficiently leave the solar system I dont think we can classify objects that do not as spacecraftsd. Rockets are called rockets for a reason, innefficient pieces of junk.
Since the apollo programs and the founding of nasa, no large education and industries was added to further development of spaceflight.
This is just the same wachingmachine during the 1969, just a dual sized edition.
@eugenioalvim Don't you find it amazing that only 241 years ago Captain Cook discovered Australia, and now we're exploring the planets? Europeans lived in Europe for thousands and thousands of years - it is phenomenal how society and technology has been transformed in a mere century.
Spaceships alone have been revolutionised since the 1960's - believe me - the 21st century will contained many untold marvels in space travel and society alike. Your '1960's technology' has seen nothing yet.
But people are talking of travelling at an amazingly unprecedented scale. I know it sounds romantic to travel forth to the unknown, but space is not your regular picnic. The smallest meteorite opens a hole the size of a window in the ISS, and we're talking about a ship that's in earth orbit. EARTH ORBIT. What's out there is much worse: even larger debris, no oxygen, severe radiation, limited fuel supply, zero return enterprises. I think it's great =).
Let's be realistic here.. the steam engine was easier than the wheel compared to travelling at 'c' , I mean, look... it took a dozen british engineers for the earliest machines, nothing truly expensive and it was after all profitable. The car was even easier: any moron could have guessed. And then came the oil age: a 2.0 of earlier industrial revolutions. Even today rockets are simply fuel large tanks... promising,ok, but again all they could come up with were satellites and missiles, hooray
@hardstyle905 Bullshit. Private Enterprise is taking over, and they will bring down the cost substantially freeing up NASA's budget. This allows them to increase their focus on beyond earth orbit missions - to the moon and beyond.
And regardless, the USA is too proud to allow China to catch up. They'll find some excuse to reassert their dominance.
@MarsMoonEuropa I don't know if you've ever built a matter-antimatter drive but to me it still sounds very Sci-Fi... right now we don't even manage to do 0.01% of the speed of light, which, considering there's hardly any resistance in space, is quite pathetic.
I'm not hating though, I just wish we would spend our time on research, not on wars :-/
@hardstyle905 Unfortunately I can't build the antimatter drive yet! Would be fantastic though - the science is there though for 80% of speed of light. And we have the technology for 10% - but people think the risk of nuclear fallout is just too great.
If your talking about interstellar travel - then yeah, we're pretty pathetic. But for interplanetary I think we're on the verge of a revolution. It would be great to colonise the Mars, Moon, and Europa!
@ti994apc - The Falcon 9 has no known final launch cost yet. We won't know until it actually starts launching humans. The $50 million cost is probably a pipe dream since that's the cost of just launching the rocket alone. The announced company cost for launching cargo Dragons to the ISS is now $133 million according to SpaceX. Human launches likely more. The cost of launching the Ares I is $1.1 billion if you only fly it once a year. At least twice a year and it goes down to $165 million/flight.
@A86 The same people who make Shuttle are trying to make Ares1. The Ares "1.1billion" p/launch price will never magically go down to 165 million/p flight by adding one additional flight. This was the same promise made for Shuttle. Anyone who believes it should go back and take basic math101 because the numbers do not add up. SpaceX posts all their prices online. No one else does that and so far they have stuck to it.
@ti994apc - It's the concept of "Economies of Scale". The price goes down because of recurring costs for flights instead of the fixed cost ($781 million) for infrastructure.
The Space Shuttle costs as much as it does because the freakin' thing has to be damn-near rebuilt after every flight and needs half its heat shield replaced. That's the bulk of the cost. The Ares I just needs a new upper stage for each flight which costs less than $138 million.
@A86 Even if you divide by 2 its still over 500 million per flight. Ares1 still has to be rolled out on a giant crawler, it still has an SRB that has to be molded back into shape, it still has to be stacked. All of which cost more money.
@ti994apc - The recurring cost per flight for Ares I is only $138 million. So how would it be $500 million/flight? Where did this extra $362 million come from? Come on dude, you can't just make up figures. The costs you're talking about such as the crawler and labor costs for molding the SRB (which isn't all that expensive) is part of that fixed cost that is paid at the beginning of a fiscal year. It's not a recurring cost paid with each individual flight.
@ti994apc - The figures are from the Augustine Commission and SpacePolicyOnline. You have to learn WHY things costs what they do for spaceflight. Stuff isn't magically cheap because of the company. ATK is no different and no less of part of the Military-Industrial Complex than Boeing, Northrup-Grumman or McDonnell-Douglas. There's nothing magical about them that makes their costs lower than ATK other than government contracts.
SpaceX operates on government contract now as well.
@ti994apc - My figures for SpaceX comes from their website. They state the cost of an unmanned Dragon cargo flight to the ISS is $133 million. $50 million is the cost of a Falcon 9 flight with no working capsule (such as Test Flight 1). An operational Dragon capsule and cargo cost the extra $83 million.
Their estimates for flights back in 2007 and 2008 was $40 million/manned flight. Now it's over $100 million/flight. Space flight is ALWAYS more expensive than companies first claim.
@A86 Cargo has a fixed cost of $54M - $59.5M million, only adjusting for inflation. Falcon Heavy is fixed at $80M - $125M. Some big name space companies offered to buy SpaceX but founder Elon Musk refused. Elon has deep philosophical belief that space travel should be very affordable if man is to ever make progress in space. If you listen to some his speeches on youtube, he constantly is saying he is not in this for the money.
@ti994apc - "Elon has deep philosophical belief that space travel should be very affordable"
And I agree with him. I have no problem with SpaceX. My problem with President Obama who is basically hinging everything on SpaceX while giving NASA $100 billion to sit around and do nothing for the next 10-15 years. That's far more wasteful than CxP (which wasn't hopelessly wasteful, according to the Augustine Commission it could be amended and made better). Obama could have handled things MUCH better.
@ti994apc - My problem is also with President Bush for proposing CxP and rushing the schedule so as not to allow for the plan to be fully hashed out before construction started and for never giving CxP the proper funding (he only gave it 40% of the funding it needed) which caused the program to fall behind schedule and run over the piddly, insufficient budget they gave it. I see no evidence that Obama has learned a lesson from Bush's problems as he's repeating them in a way.
The Saturn V did the job over forty years ago. What happened? Why is Mankind content to crawl about the surface of Earth? By now, we should be on Mars.
NASA stands for the National Anal Sex Association, which likes to build big penis shaped objects as monuments to their fallen heros, such as John Wayne. Sometimes these phallic objects fly into space, never to return. Other times, they carry people a few hundred feet off the ground only to kill them all in a blaze of glory.
America will benefit more in the pursuit of space exploration rather than bailing out banks and related institutions that failed. Space Exploration is an endeavor that will generate employment. The leadership of this once proud nation is being dragged down by the folly of greedy individuals in the finance business sector. Furthermore those people behind these failures have nothing to offer but shame and misery to the majority of the populace of this once great country that I admire.
@MrNoeboy most of those jobs in the space industry would go to high tech engineering companies in the USA. having a full order book with Nasa would allow them to develop commercial products which would bring in foreign currency. Now the USA would struggle to build an Apollo program; its engineering base has been out-sourced to Asia. current policy dictates that the free market should build the next generation of rockets. Curious that the same rules don't apply to bank subsidy or farm aid
@hexicola in a nutshell, even if the US continued the space program, still its citizen will benefit less because of international trade policies is that it? in my opinion which ever the case I would still like the americans to lead the role in space exploration. they deserve it..i grew up reading the glorious era of apollo missions. and never did appreciated a three decades of LEO missions. i love the americans for their boldness in this endeavors but i hate their foreign policies.
You know, we could have been in space by now. We could be mining the asteroid belt, maybe even have a colony on the moon. Everybody's financial and economic wellbeing would have increased dramatically.
But nope! We blew the cash to fund space exploration on wellfare, because fuck sucess! It doesn't matter that the booming industry would have brought more wealth to everyone than the welfare ever would have, what is important TRYING to solv the problem NOW, even if it fucks everyone in the ass!
I wish Obama and Democrats would realize the importance of NASA. He wants a Sputnick moment but doesn't want to fund it. Not only that NASA pushes technological envelopes which brings about new Technologies which create new industeries. NASA is the best investment the USA can make. How ever I do think NASA should commit to fewer projets and actually complete them then try to accomplish so much at one time.
@egli002 Awesome man, keep it up. I hope you will become a very successfull scientist. Never give your dreams up. The world needs more of people like you.
@egli002 I wish you the best of luck friend, the world needs people that follow their dreams and won't quit...remember, dreams are a guide, let your dreams guide you to your destination and make it part of your reality...because nothing is impossible, and everything is possible.
@hardstyle905 None of my business- but why does he have to 'grow up'? As I understand it he said he wants to work towards developing advanced propulsion technology that will allow humans to travel at close to (if not at) light speed so that we can navigate and travel the Universe easier.
@egli002 You do realise that it at the speed of light would take about 4 years to get to the nearest star right? And that one doesn't even have planets.
The closest one with planets (theory) is 10 years away at the speed of light.
To be honest you should go for NASA. But if you seriously expect to achieve your goal of making speed of light travel possible. You will face a major let-down.
Then again, the accepted theory about what would happen if we reached those speeds is pretty damn weird.
@Ze3g0 the speed of light is : 299 792 458 m / s. it mean i can travel 299 792 458 miles for one sec... now calculate for how much long can i travel for 2 sec , for 3 sec , for 60 sec , for 5 minutes ... with this speed we can go anywere... But the problem is can we make an engine that have as propulsion : ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES... OR EVEN LIGHT PROPULSION
@Ze3g0 You have not captured the essence ... Suppose that we have created the engine that has magnetic wave propulsion ... Suppose if we find a galaxy, where the planets of which are "vital" (with life) ... But the problem is that the galaxy is far away, just as you say ... it will take 4 years to go in that galaxy. Then what will we do? The spaceship would not be equip with one engine ... but with 6 ... 299 000 000 x 6 =? ... Do you get it bro.The distance it does not matter, but speed.
@Ze3g0 Well if you have speed ... then you can go wherever you want. But the problem is when you realize these things and who ... But that madeall this must have courage, confidence, wit ... I do not know if I will be able to create such a thing ...But I will try ...I also have 60 years of life before ... All my life I will pay attention to these things ... But I fear to the economy (money) for these things ... And my dream can easily burn. I wish so much that someone else had the same dream
@FrostbitexP Its a term of endearment for those whose testes have not descended. Sorry if its difficult to explain in written words, perhaps a picture book would work?
@egli002 I know bro i want to someday try and help people invent terraforming.Terraforming means to change a lifeless planet into a liveable one. I know it sounds crazy but Mars might be like Earth someday with what my dream is. Terraforming. I even think it will be possible to have a NAVY in space. I will try my best to dedicate my life to Space Technology. And someday our paths will meet. :)
@SuperColonel77 Yeah ... I love your idea ... Make dead planets come alive ... In this way we can colonize any planet that we want ... Man i never have think about this project before ... Its very very HELPFUL ! So im not the only one who want to do something for this humanity ... You dont know how happy i am. It look ridiculous : It look like the history is going to be repeated. The USA BOOM Technology(1920-1970) ... ---->2020 - 2070 ...
graphics INCRIBLE
terminador8 1 day ago
@ixonixan least we got our own rockets
sj176 2 days ago
I have no problems understanding why they scrapped this program: Look at the amount of junk it produces - junk that will be there as a threat to future launches. And all that junk cost money. We need to rethink the whole approach to space travel.
doomdayjudge 3 days ago
as spoken in the great words of white goodman "fuck you chuck norris"
Diddds79 1 week ago
The Ares V, grandfather of all rockets... No more!!
SCANDALOUS!
EthanNin0 1 week ago
Chuck Norris just called. He wants his toys back.
Coolness782 3 weeks ago
FFS! The only thing NASA seems to be good at is making computer animations of missions they're going to go to... gosh!
YoLninYo 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I think to visit mars will be very hard, nasa & jpl and all the private space industries should work global with everyone together to achieve the following steps.
1. International Moon Station (Getting the knowledge for setting-up one on mars)
2. New Technologies tested in Space for Deep Space Missions
to go much cheaper, faster and saver
3. New LaunchPad/Solution in Space/from the Moon
+ new much more efficient (in costs & speed) Propulsion
4. International Mars Station. Local Launch System.
ILoveDominikaDetko 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
ILoveDominikaDetko 4 weeks ago
NASA are just a bunch of fantasists. I have more faith in China going to the moon than NASA ever getting there!
merlyn1900 1 month ago
Fuck You Obama! It's all your fucking fault.
luisr12491 1 month ago 11
@luisr12491 Really ? You don't remember it was Cheney/Bush2 who cancelled the shuttle and delayed the Orion project until it was late and way over budget ? Yea, I bet you vote Republican too.
Postie218 3 weeks ago
@luisr12491 this is dated 2006 way before obama
1gient 2 weeks ago
@luisr12491
How is this Obamas fault ?
Sadik0gungor91 1 week ago
yup orion is alive and is launching in T-Minus 1hour and 30 minutes! go and check it out on Nasa TV on the internet. The rocket is ORION V
GeorgeChar95 2 months ago
ORION LIVES ON!!!
Gorilder 2 months ago
Nice animations....but space exploration is doomed here in the United States. Poor politics is to blame.
ziggycat999 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
they did this, becouse America going to need more money to make wars...
ixonixas 3 months ago
Comment removed
ixonixas 3 months ago
The winner of the Nobel prize. the Terminator of voyages to the Moon. The continuator of the war on terror. The man who wants to be reelected.
Why I don´t get amazed by all of it?
Because we are aboard the Titanic and I am seeing the iceberg.
heliosium 3 months ago
Obama's a retard for cancelling nasa's spaceship program. but they got back.they made a game with ALL the info from 10000 light years away.boy, he got pissed.
AgentBloxx 4 months ago
@AgentBloxx I thought Obama was the one who helped them restart it? Nasa were the ones who put it on hold.
unbrokenjack 4 months ago
Yth are we reverting back to capsule technology when 20 years ago we were designing reusable SSTOs?
moonroverer 4 months ago
fucking nigger destroys NASA budget and manned spaceflight, humanity cant survive on this planet forever, we need to go into space, well thats what happens when u elect a black, everything goes to shit
CryptWarrior69 4 months ago
Comment removed
Brick092 4 months ago
@CryptWarrior69 Watch your language, juvenile.
unbrokenjack 4 months ago 2
@CryptWarrior69 why don't you go have a Klan rally on Mars then
mbuller11 4 months ago
@CryptWarrior69 before bashing a president based on his skin color, look into what's going on first. The Constellation program was cancelled, but they now have a new program. The Orion spacecraft WILL still be used, and it will take humans to an asteroid by 2020s and to Mars by the 2030s. Cheers.
TheBurmanUnicorn 4 months ago
@TheBurmanUnicorn u dumb ass because he canceled the constallation project i bet u 100% other presidents will cancel the asteroid project because of money it is at our worst time to not give up and obama gave up fuck him
srblackbird1 3 months ago
@srblackbird1 Whoa, why do you see the need for personal insults?
TheBurmanUnicorn 3 months ago
@TheBurmanUnicorn ok just stop it dude that bastard should'nt have canceled it neil armstrong agrees ask the other apollo astronauts
srblackbird1 3 months ago
@srblackbird1 Armstrong disagrees, true, but that doesn't mean anything? Is he God, or something? And besides, Buzz Aldrin and former directors do support Obama.
TheBurmanUnicorn 3 months ago
@TheBurmanUnicorn if u respect the first person to ever walk on the moon than u will know the director gets fired if he dissagres with obama obama is a fuckin tool that's why he is not going to be reelected promises things he cant deliver already because he passed a bill 2 years ago more people are out of jobs than in fuck u and him
srblackbird1 3 months ago
@srblackbird1 Sure. In that case, I have nothing else to hear from you. I have done nothing but talk to you with respect- if you're going to troll around with your attitude, I'd rather hear from someone more educated and respectful.
TheBurmanUnicorn 3 months ago
@TheBurmanUnicorn alright i am sorry for my attitude it got out of hand let's call a treaty
srblackbird1 3 months ago
@srblackbird1 oh and also, budget cuts WILL have to be made, with the current financial condition. I agree he should have made cuts from the defense budget though, but Obama space policy isn't wrong as well.
TheBurmanUnicorn 3 months ago
@srblackbird1 And besides, who knows how the financial condition of the US will be 10 years from now? It won't probably be canceled. There is a good chance that the country will recover.
TheBurmanUnicorn 3 months ago
@srblackbird1 Really? Is that what you do? Bring profanity into the conversation, and insult a random stranger just because you're safe behind your pc?
TheBurmanUnicorn 3 months ago
@TheBurmanUnicorn yea that's what i do try to convine people who don't use their brain
srblackbird1 3 months ago
I no fan of Obama but he was right to cancel this program. Spacex is light years ahead with their Falcon 9 /Dragon launch vehicle and spacecraft than NASA was going to be in 6 or 7 years.
bibbler227 4 months ago
@bibbler227 Amen
TheWebMan2010 4 months ago
This is all bullshit i should be living in space right know.let me live in space dammit.
omega4chimp 4 months ago in playlist spaceship movies
@omega4chimp good ur right
srblackbird1 3 months ago
Ne higgyen senki a NASA-nak!Hazudnak!Soha nem mondtak igazat!De eljött végre az emberek ideje!Nem vagyunk állatok!Jogunk van az igazsághoz!Ami kezdődik abban milliók vesznek részt!És tanulja meg végre minden álszent szervezet: EMBER NEM LEHET AZ EMBEREK URA!!!!
robisilvi 4 months ago
You can thank The Bankers for the thwarted efforts to get anywhere soon. Those greedy bastards and there rip off tax payer funded - Boom and Bust system - is why it will take forever to get anywhere in the Cosmos...
ludwigvonsteampole1 4 months ago
I know that Constellation is cancelled mostly. They are buliding and testing Orion CEV, but I want to ask: HOW IT WILL BE LAUNCHED INTO ORBIT???!!!!
kuki5050 5 months ago
@kuki5050 check NASA's webpage...
newbie7407 4 months ago
NASA has made a career out of cancelled programs. Hmmm, let me see. The US doesn't even have a manned space program any longer, does it? thank you President Obama for cancelling the manned space program after 40 years. Bravo!
NRay1660 5 months ago
Touch down on the land? Are you sure that's wise
cyanman123 5 months ago
@cyanman123 That's what the Soyuz has been doing for years however it isn't pretty. Instead of using airbags it uses explosions to slow it down. On an ideal landing it's something like hitting the ground going 30mph.
Enatbyte 5 months ago
this is not cancelled? the constellation program will make these a reality
HeartStrikerz 5 months ago
@HeartStrikerz The entire Constellation program was cancelled
ThatAdelaideGuy 5 months ago
@HeartStrikerz He's right sadly.
Enatbyte 5 months ago
Thanks to the Obama Administration we are all now in the "Age of Soyuz."
WhereDidItAllGo7 5 months ago
@WhereDidItAllGo7
Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush didn't help either.
HaroldHoltCantSwim 5 months ago
Apollo on crack rock?
PaintSlinger99 5 months ago
@MrDarkZodiak
If Mir was such garbage, then how come that the Russian Zvezda and Zarya modules of the ISS are basically Mir-components?
And those prototypes are not human-rated.. Well, the Orion is, but there's no rocket for it to fly on. If the US could go there themselves, they wouldn't be paying Russia, it's that simple.
legohelicopter 5 months ago
@MrDarkZodiak Ya but our debt makes it obvious the money is used for the secret space and plantary gaurd with bases in the earths hollow center, pulling energy from the core vortex star to ruin reality by manipulating all atoms to fart awareness just after taco time....Im high, Tacos are its Creator in seperate duality. obama
420Woltar 6 months ago
@MrDarkZodiak
1957 first satellite,1962 first man in the space,1970 The first robot lunar rover on the moon,1986 Mir first space station,2011 Russians the only ones who can get to ISS.
So...Russians wins space war,hehe^^
unitedtoshare 6 months ago
he, he...he,he,, he ,he
you do not have money...he, he
ivan35292 6 months ago
No more flights into space.
you do not have money...he, he
ivan35292 6 months ago
SO hiw they come home -.- ?
FlamesBoomZ 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It may sound comical to anyone with a brain ,but the best argument NASA has to support their so called moon landings is...the soviets..
watch?v=NQfTh7UHxiw
potrodsas 6 months ago
I'm glad this program was canceled; it was a giant leap backwards in space travel and would have cost more than the entire history of the space program put together. Developing the space plane is the way to go forward; it combines all of the shuttle program technology into one vehicle.
jlr92958 6 months ago
i flagged this as child abuse
zzerDrezz 6 months ago 42
L @zzerDrezz O L
LordKaisen 1 month ago
Turn the sound off.. Open another tab and play Mind Heist from Inception. Makes an epic video more epic!
Viz731 6 months ago
@Viz731
Hell yeah !
johnyringoz 6 months ago
screw it! we should just bring back the apollo missions!
beaniebrothers1 6 months ago
@beaniebrothers1 This program is the Apollo missions, only in the 21st century.
jlr92958 6 months ago
@jlr92958 oo ok thanks but i thought they were goen to use a different type of rocket...... crap earlier i meant to say saturn V rockets
beaniebrothers1 6 months ago
Respond to this video... high presser water rocket
amyjohntx 6 months ago
I LOVE POKEMON. IM EM THE POKEMON MASTER I EM THE POKEMON TOO
krisis002 6 months ago
prikroy minja ja dolzen sigrats pokemon
krisis002 6 months ago
suriken
krisis002 6 months ago
With LVs like Ares V and Energia, it is possible to loft 150+ tonnes to LEO. What this means is we can send an entire Lunar Outpost consisting of separate modules for crew quarters, science lab, greenhouse, fuel tanks, batteries, solar panel farms and even a small nuclear reactor for emergency and a couple of rovers all in one shot or may be 2-3 shots, depending upon the size of each module. Though it might be safer to do it in bits to avoid losing the whole thing in case of LV failure.
harishkumar09 6 months ago
Its amazing how massively big Ares1 actually is compared to the size of its payload it actually puts into LEO. It needs to be a heavy lift rocket system (which adds major cost) because of its escape system must be gigantic to have a chance at survival. That is because NASA insists on using a Shuttle SRB which is a design failure. Escaping from an SRB failure is exponentially more difficult to do than a liquid fueled rocket failure.
ti994apc 6 months ago
Did they start this program back up? I've been seeing previews and breakdowns of the rocket on the NASA channel.
KaTzaNdSTuFf 6 months ago
There is no sound in space... :P
Scoinsoffaterocks 6 months ago
@tomanyasses alright, no need to sware (you typical american, who reads halve a book and decides that they understand the subject). I was talking about a TENTH not ten times, can you not read a short comment, a tenth everyone knows about the fact that you cant travel faster than the speed of light. If you don't already know I am refering to the matter anti-matter engines which could go at a TENTH of the speed of light. In your own words 'dumb shit'
VTOLAircraftMad 6 months ago
Very nice sound effects IN SPACE!!!! I guess it brings it's own atmosphere around the rocket for some noise.
TubyJan 6 months ago
@TubyJan
well it would be boring without noise (:
FrostbitexP 6 months ago
@FrostbitexP I guess even NASA chose entertainment above physics with this animation, which is a beautiful animation I must say.
TubyJan 6 months ago
This is the problem with this countrol, poor insight and little initiative
RainbowManification 6 months ago
U.S. does not have the money right now, Spending it all on useless wars and bailouts. Has anything changed...yes..the country's debt has grown.
fakeseeker50 6 months ago
I enjoy using mp3bat (try googling it) for s00ngs. The site has everything I would ever want.
NedeHull 7 months ago
THEY DONT FREAKIN CARE WHERE THE DAMN ROCK PARTS ARE GONA LAND......
sandgar1001 7 months ago
Maybe it is just me, but I think throwing away 90% (or about) of your spacecraft seems like a very big waste to me.
eivissano 7 months ago
@obsoehollerith ermn...What..?!
taivo67 7 months ago
This is bullshit NASA is covering up 80% of the information that the public doesn't want to know - Go onto "YOUTUBE N WATCH DR STEVEN GREER EXPLAINS THE TRUTH BEHIND ALL OF THIS!!
liammccarthy10 7 months ago
Part II | Space Science - Cosmology - Exobiology - theoretical physics - Geometric Topology - knot theory : Diversity ( mathematical ) i.e. is not like the Euclidean space (Hyperbolic geometry - Hyper Space) and also equipped with the properties would have to transform themselves into other objects, similar to knot theory. Ponds matter and force particles = theory of SUSY = Dark matter ?
LLCY © 2011
lloydguillaumegroup 7 months ago
Part I |Space Science - Cosmology - Exobiology - theoretical physics- Geometric Topology - knot theory : Room = order model ,structure = present amount, homeomorphism = transformation of an object (topologically equivalent) as a mathematical hypothesis would be collected : Elementary - (SUSY) would have the following characteristics - Syntactic Reversibility - transformation is not only limited in alternating two objects .
LLCY © 2011
lloydguillaumegroup 7 months ago
didn't they already do this? In 1969 or thereabouts.
gruff5 7 months ago
@gruff5
The CEV is quite similar in concept to the Apollo craft, but significantly larger and more modern. Modern computers allow the command module to be self-guided allowing the full crew of up to 6 to descend to the lunar surface for potentially one to two weeks and the payload space is good enough to allow for development of rudimentary lunar bases which future missions could inhabit. No way apollo would be able to build a PERMANENT SETTLEMENT ON THE MOON.
MichaelCox 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can someone help me out with this? I've just recorded it today and have no idea what it is but it looks interesting. And No it's not an airplane btw. Read the discription /watch?v=acIBkj-8Rz4
vigank5 7 months ago
uhmmm... you're saying that NASA was simply going to duplicate the Apollo space craft... and mission? I support space exploration but I can see why this would be on the chopping block. I can't even see a reason to have a manned mission to mars. I think a self sustaining space station should be a the top of the list.
unambitious 7 months ago
@unambitious partly agree partly disagree. yes its not a priority to simply re create the Apollo's. The objective behind the mission was not the same though it was more focused on long term living (i.e. 6months) with the new technology's they are developing (e.g. some dude has managed to extract water from 'moon dust' which is silica-hydroxide based glasses). A maned mission to mars i guess is an extension of this - all places we need to persue for future but i agree with the space station.
nickoswoos 7 months ago
im still waiting for them to go to mars they said they would be there in year 2000 . ya way to go world head stuck up your ass
tomanyasses 7 months ago
Very exited about this
cyanman123 7 months ago
Beautiful visuals. Much respect.
v1ct0rth3cl34n3r 7 months ago
As long as we have to burn 1000tons of matter to get 3/6tons to orbit i feel hardly urged to call it a spaceship as i would just catastrofically fool myself and lie, just as nasa does by promising spacecrafts and still offers washingmachines.
Armigo91 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A YOUTUBE video "UFO Disclosure A Global Deception Conspiracy "
reveals hidden awaremess of life outside Earth by politicians,
astronauts, American presidents, military personnel, along
with aired UFO news footage. This compilation contains planned
revelations about free energy technology, initiated first contact
along with current and ongoing E.T. presence which is being hidden
from the public + more.
Futurecop2012D 7 months ago
Why do we still call it a spacecraft? As long as a vehicle doesnt have the power to self sufficiently leave the solar system I dont think we can classify objects that do not as spacecraftsd. Rockets are called rockets for a reason, innefficient pieces of junk.
Since the apollo programs and the founding of nasa, no large education and industries was added to further development of spaceflight.
This is just the same wachingmachine during the 1969, just a dual sized edition.
Armigo91 7 months ago
OMG justin bieber and chuck norris fighting! xD hahaa
Rockification09 7 months ago
I love all of the TLAs used in the Space industry. (Three Letter Accronyms)
Jonno2summit 7 months ago 10
@Jonno2summit We need some FLAs in there. Mix it up a bit!
matthewakian2 4 months ago in playlist Technology
Comment removed
ElmoTitanWolf 8 months ago
@SuperColonel77 it's impossible to travel at the speed of light, and what chemical fuel is that? i'm intrigued.
ElmoTitanWolf 8 months ago
I feel a little bit disgusted to see the 1960's technology still in use in Space Travel.
Is it necessary to leave all that trash on Earth's orbit and on the Moon's surface???
eugenioalvim 8 months ago
@eugenioalvim
it burns up in the atmosphere, on the moon im not quite sure
samosammo123 8 months ago
@eugenioalvim Don't you find it amazing that only 241 years ago Captain Cook discovered Australia, and now we're exploring the planets? Europeans lived in Europe for thousands and thousands of years - it is phenomenal how society and technology has been transformed in a mere century.
Spaceships alone have been revolutionised since the 1960's - believe me - the 21st century will contained many untold marvels in space travel and society alike. Your '1960's technology' has seen nothing yet.
MarsMoonEuropa 8 months ago
Why is there a propane tank on the front of that space shuttle. BBQs inspace!! I know there was more going on up there. Lunar Baby Back ribs!
meronmotors 8 months ago
This would've worked so well
N5505KD 8 months ago
@N5505KD yeah I know I wanted to see men on the moon again that wounld have been really cool and awesome
TheCHUCKY1992 8 months ago
@TheCHUCKY1992
I know right? I guess they never had the money
N5505KD 8 months ago
flight was cancelled because NASA used up its budget making this video.
bananian 8 months ago
But people are talking of travelling at an amazingly unprecedented scale. I know it sounds romantic to travel forth to the unknown, but space is not your regular picnic. The smallest meteorite opens a hole the size of a window in the ISS, and we're talking about a ship that's in earth orbit. EARTH ORBIT. What's out there is much worse: even larger debris, no oxygen, severe radiation, limited fuel supply, zero return enterprises. I think it's great =).
pedroissler 8 months ago
Let's be realistic here.. the steam engine was easier than the wheel compared to travelling at 'c' , I mean, look... it took a dozen british engineers for the earliest machines, nothing truly expensive and it was after all profitable. The car was even easier: any moron could have guessed. And then came the oil age: a 2.0 of earlier industrial revolutions. Even today rockets are simply fuel large tanks... promising,ok, but again all they could come up with were satellites and missiles, hooray
pedroissler 8 months ago
@pedroissler you have no idea what your talking about
PLUSHAIRPLANECARPET 8 months ago
@PLUSHAIRPLANECARPET yeah right let's travel at light speed hooray
pedroissler 8 months ago
@PLUSHAIRPLANECARPET we just need someone who will be willing to pay the fucking bill in the end..
pedroissler 8 months ago
NASA is decommissioning their shuttles without having a replacement. That's it for you, USA. China will take over space exploration.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@hardstyle905 Bullshit. Private Enterprise is taking over, and they will bring down the cost substantially freeing up NASA's budget. This allows them to increase their focus on beyond earth orbit missions - to the moon and beyond.
And regardless, the USA is too proud to allow China to catch up. They'll find some excuse to reassert their dominance.
MarsMoonEuropa 8 months ago
@MarsMoonEuropa I don't know if you've ever built a matter-antimatter drive but to me it still sounds very Sci-Fi... right now we don't even manage to do 0.01% of the speed of light, which, considering there's hardly any resistance in space, is quite pathetic.
I'm not hating though, I just wish we would spend our time on research, not on wars :-/
PS. Cool channel.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@hardstyle905 Unfortunately I can't build the antimatter drive yet! Would be fantastic though - the science is there though for 80% of speed of light. And we have the technology for 10% - but people think the risk of nuclear fallout is just too great.
If your talking about interstellar travel - then yeah, we're pretty pathetic. But for interplanetary I think we're on the verge of a revolution. It would be great to colonise the Mars, Moon, and Europa!
MarsMoonEuropa 8 months ago
@ti994apc - The Falcon 9 has no known final launch cost yet. We won't know until it actually starts launching humans. The $50 million cost is probably a pipe dream since that's the cost of just launching the rocket alone. The announced company cost for launching cargo Dragons to the ISS is now $133 million according to SpaceX. Human launches likely more. The cost of launching the Ares I is $1.1 billion if you only fly it once a year. At least twice a year and it goes down to $165 million/flight.
A86 8 months ago
@A86 The same people who make Shuttle are trying to make Ares1. The Ares "1.1billion" p/launch price will never magically go down to 165 million/p flight by adding one additional flight. This was the same promise made for Shuttle. Anyone who believes it should go back and take basic math101 because the numbers do not add up. SpaceX posts all their prices online. No one else does that and so far they have stuck to it.
ti994apc 8 months ago
@ti994apc - It's the concept of "Economies of Scale". The price goes down because of recurring costs for flights instead of the fixed cost ($781 million) for infrastructure.
The Space Shuttle costs as much as it does because the freakin' thing has to be damn-near rebuilt after every flight and needs half its heat shield replaced. That's the bulk of the cost. The Ares I just needs a new upper stage for each flight which costs less than $138 million.
A86 8 months ago 2
@A86 Even if you divide by 2 its still over 500 million per flight. Ares1 still has to be rolled out on a giant crawler, it still has an SRB that has to be molded back into shape, it still has to be stacked. All of which cost more money.
ti994apc 8 months ago
@ti994apc - The recurring cost per flight for Ares I is only $138 million. So how would it be $500 million/flight? Where did this extra $362 million come from? Come on dude, you can't just make up figures. The costs you're talking about such as the crawler and labor costs for molding the SRB (which isn't all that expensive) is part of that fixed cost that is paid at the beginning of a fiscal year. It's not a recurring cost paid with each individual flight.
A86 8 months ago
@ti994apc - The figures are from the Augustine Commission and SpacePolicyOnline. You have to learn WHY things costs what they do for spaceflight. Stuff isn't magically cheap because of the company. ATK is no different and no less of part of the Military-Industrial Complex than Boeing, Northrup-Grumman or McDonnell-Douglas. There's nothing magical about them that makes their costs lower than ATK other than government contracts.
SpaceX operates on government contract now as well.
A86 8 months ago 2
@ti994apc - My figures for SpaceX comes from their website. They state the cost of an unmanned Dragon cargo flight to the ISS is $133 million. $50 million is the cost of a Falcon 9 flight with no working capsule (such as Test Flight 1). An operational Dragon capsule and cargo cost the extra $83 million.
Their estimates for flights back in 2007 and 2008 was $40 million/manned flight. Now it's over $100 million/flight. Space flight is ALWAYS more expensive than companies first claim.
A86 8 months ago
@A86 Cargo has a fixed cost of $54M - $59.5M million, only adjusting for inflation. Falcon Heavy is fixed at $80M - $125M. Some big name space companies offered to buy SpaceX but founder Elon Musk refused. Elon has deep philosophical belief that space travel should be very affordable if man is to ever make progress in space. If you listen to some his speeches on youtube, he constantly is saying he is not in this for the money.
ti994apc 8 months ago
@ti994apc - "Elon has deep philosophical belief that space travel should be very affordable"
And I agree with him. I have no problem with SpaceX. My problem with President Obama who is basically hinging everything on SpaceX while giving NASA $100 billion to sit around and do nothing for the next 10-15 years. That's far more wasteful than CxP (which wasn't hopelessly wasteful, according to the Augustine Commission it could be amended and made better). Obama could have handled things MUCH better.
A86 8 months ago
@ti994apc - My problem is also with President Bush for proposing CxP and rushing the schedule so as not to allow for the plan to be fully hashed out before construction started and for never giving CxP the proper funding (he only gave it 40% of the funding it needed) which caused the program to fall behind schedule and run over the piddly, insufficient budget they gave it. I see no evidence that Obama has learned a lesson from Bush's problems as he's repeating them in a way.
A86 8 months ago
has anyone ever read the true story Space by James A Mitchner? that shit is crazy
tsharpmac420 8 months ago
The Saturn V did the job over forty years ago. What happened? Why is Mankind content to crawl about the surface of Earth? By now, we should be on Mars.
bogglerful 8 months ago
"UFO Disclosure A Global Deception Conspiracy" ON
YOUTUBE is a disclosure of major lies and with held
information regarding life outside of Earth. Footage containing statements
from, military personnel, astronauts, American presidents and politicians.
+ credible news footage. The compilation contains revelations
regarding awareness of life beyond Earth along with it's current and ongoing
presence which is being hidden from the public + more.
Futurecop2012F 8 months ago
THE NEW KILLER ROBOT can be seen in the video blop75
christophehersent 9 months ago
When they docked with the LM in the old days, you could hear a fast "bang bang bang bang.." Does anyone know what caused that?
ingareinar007 9 months ago
@ingareinar007 I think it was the automated latches securing the vehicles together
MightySaturn5 8 months ago
@MightySaturn5 Thanx man :)
ingareinar007 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NASA stands for the National Anal Sex Association, which likes to build big penis shaped objects as monuments to their fallen heros, such as John Wayne. Sometimes these phallic objects fly into space, never to return. Other times, they carry people a few hundred feet off the ground only to kill them all in a blaze of glory.
LucifersCockMeat 9 months ago
America will benefit more in the pursuit of space exploration rather than bailing out banks and related institutions that failed. Space Exploration is an endeavor that will generate employment. The leadership of this once proud nation is being dragged down by the folly of greedy individuals in the finance business sector. Furthermore those people behind these failures have nothing to offer but shame and misery to the majority of the populace of this once great country that I admire.
MrNoeboy 9 months ago
@MrNoeboy most of those jobs in the space industry would go to high tech engineering companies in the USA. having a full order book with Nasa would allow them to develop commercial products which would bring in foreign currency. Now the USA would struggle to build an Apollo program; its engineering base has been out-sourced to Asia. current policy dictates that the free market should build the next generation of rockets. Curious that the same rules don't apply to bank subsidy or farm aid
hexicola 6 months ago
@hexicola in a nutshell, even if the US continued the space program, still its citizen will benefit less because of international trade policies is that it? in my opinion which ever the case I would still like the americans to lead the role in space exploration. they deserve it..i grew up reading the glorious era of apollo missions. and never did appreciated a three decades of LEO missions. i love the americans for their boldness in this endeavors but i hate their foreign policies.
MrNoeboy 4 months ago
@hexicola by the way I'm from southeast asia.
MrNoeboy 4 months ago
How did i get here..
thaprohaxord 9 months ago
@thaprohaxord Haha, same. I was watching the newest ferrari or something xD
xxxDjFreddyxxx 9 months ago
You know, we could have been in space by now. We could be mining the asteroid belt, maybe even have a colony on the moon. Everybody's financial and economic wellbeing would have increased dramatically.
But nope! We blew the cash to fund space exploration on wellfare, because fuck sucess! It doesn't matter that the booming industry would have brought more wealth to everyone than the welfare ever would have, what is important TRYING to solv the problem NOW, even if it fucks everyone in the ass!
rinnix1 9 months ago 2
I don't see what the problem is. Russia will happily take our space junk with them when they explore the universe.
davitodude 9 months ago
I wish Obama and Democrats would realize the importance of NASA. He wants a Sputnick moment but doesn't want to fund it. Not only that NASA pushes technological envelopes which brings about new Technologies which create new industeries. NASA is the best investment the USA can make. How ever I do think NASA should commit to fewer projets and actually complete them then try to accomplish so much at one time.
DorkVader26 9 months ago
Comment removed
egli002 9 months ago 38
@egli002 Awesome man, keep it up. I hope you will become a very successfull scientist. Never give your dreams up. The world needs more of people like you.
Drcrazy93 9 months ago
@egli002 I wish you the best of luck friend, the world needs people that follow their dreams and won't quit...remember, dreams are a guide, let your dreams guide you to your destination and make it part of your reality...because nothing is impossible, and everything is possible.
graywolf87 9 months ago
@egli002 we need more people like you in science :)
jimsac2000 9 months ago
@egli002 You sir, are a win.
ta666ak666 9 months ago
@egli002 well it's time to grow up.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@hardstyle905 None of my business- but why does he have to 'grow up'? As I understand it he said he wants to work towards developing advanced propulsion technology that will allow humans to travel at close to (if not at) light speed so that we can navigate and travel the Universe easier.
GrandScheme14 8 months ago
@GrandScheme14 I know I'm being a killjoy here but sadly, I believe Einstein.
hardstyle905 8 months ago
@egli002 You do realise that it at the speed of light would take about 4 years to get to the nearest star right? And that one doesn't even have planets.
The closest one with planets (theory) is 10 years away at the speed of light.
To be honest you should go for NASA. But if you seriously expect to achieve your goal of making speed of light travel possible. You will face a major let-down.
Then again, the accepted theory about what would happen if we reached those speeds is pretty damn weird.
Ze3g0 8 months ago
@Ze3g0 the speed of light is : 299 792 458 m / s. it mean i can travel 299 792 458 miles for one sec... now calculate for how much long can i travel for 2 sec , for 3 sec , for 60 sec , for 5 minutes ... with this speed we can go anywere... But the problem is can we make an engine that have as propulsion : ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES... OR EVEN LIGHT PROPULSION
egli002 8 months ago
@egli002 I know. But if you check the distance to our nearest star it still takes around 4 years to go there even at the speed of light...
Ze3g0 8 months ago
@Ze3g0 You have not captured the essence ... Suppose that we have created the engine that has magnetic wave propulsion ... Suppose if we find a galaxy, where the planets of which are "vital" (with life) ... But the problem is that the galaxy is far away, just as you say ... it will take 4 years to go in that galaxy. Then what will we do? The spaceship would not be equip with one engine ... but with 6 ... 299 000 000 x 6 =? ... Do you get it bro.The distance it does not matter, but speed.
egli002 8 months ago
@Ze3g0 Well if you have speed ... then you can go wherever you want. But the problem is when you realize these things and who ... But that madeall this must have courage, confidence, wit ... I do not know if I will be able to create such a thing ...But I will try ...I also have 60 years of life before ... All my life I will pay attention to these things ... But I fear to the economy (money) for these things ... And my dream can easily burn. I wish so much that someone else had the same dream
egli002 8 months ago
@egli002 Work on getting your dick sucked champ
SkInHoUnD 8 months ago
@SkInHoUnD
Learn to stop being a fagot and get a life bro.
FrostbitexP 8 months ago
@FrostbitexP Sure, son. Come back when you hit puberty.
SkInHoUnD 8 months ago
@SkInHoUnD
Lame unoriginal come back, your obviously no fun to piss off.
Cya.
FrostbitexP 8 months ago
@FrostbitexP Run along now skippy, Hannah Montanna must be on.
SkInHoUnD 8 months ago
@SkInHoUnD Skippy?...is that some term you old people used to use?
FrostbitexP 8 months ago
@FrostbitexP Its a term of endearment for those whose testes have not descended. Sorry if its difficult to explain in written words, perhaps a picture book would work?
SkInHoUnD 8 months ago
@egli002 Crazy but not impossible!
MarsMoonEuropa 8 months ago
@egli002 I know bro i want to someday try and help people invent terraforming.Terraforming means to change a lifeless planet into a liveable one. I know it sounds crazy but Mars might be like Earth someday with what my dream is. Terraforming. I even think it will be possible to have a NAVY in space. I will try my best to dedicate my life to Space Technology. And someday our paths will meet. :)
SuperColonel77 8 months ago
@SuperColonel77 Yeah ... I love your idea ... Make dead planets come alive ... In this way we can colonize any planet that we want ... Man i never have think about this project before ... Its very very HELPFUL ! So im not the only one who want to do something for this humanity ... You dont know how happy i am. It look ridiculous : It look like the history is going to be repeated. The USA BOOM Technology(1920-1970) ... ---->2020 - 2070 ...
egli002 8 months ago