Err, your description of the video is a little wrong. I think you'll find the Cornell vehicle started to pull away once MIT was alongside it (I believe the MIT vehicle successfully demonstrated its ability go around a stationary object). Therefore the Cornell was at fault... Its strange, but not entirely surprising, how the computer drivers make the same basic mistakes human drivers do!!
I have a hunch that they had interference with each other's LIDAR systems that close. Not sure who the fault is.. I guess one could argue they were both at fault. One should not have cut so close once passing, and the other should not have jammed in the gas. Thanks for the correction.
Hi Firefaxx, thanks for your reply. Its nice to find someone on YouTube that doesn't instantly take offence to a comment that they don't agree with. What a breath of fresh air! :-) All the best my friend!
HI VBTHING. I saw the video you linked to too. You can clearly see, after viewing both videos that the MIT car was a good cars width away and half a vehicles length in front of the Cornell car when Cornell started to pull away. Its effectively the same as a human parked at the side of the road pulling out without checking the mirror first. The "parked" car pulling into traffic would be at fault.
Sounds like a case of road rage to me.
djsufferthing 1 year ago
lol dumb cars
waddlerobloxxxx 1 year ago
Thanks for posting this!
nvsvictor 2 years ago
Interesting that you can apparently see the IR from the lidar systems in the image (vertical red stripes at 0:05)
hyretech 3 years ago
Yes, Many of the video's that were shot that day had the IR distortion, Even though the camera has an IR filter, those LIDAR's put out the juice.
Firefaxx 3 years ago
oh, so that's what that was! i thought it was a camera problem.
nvsvictor 2 years ago
Damn, thanks, I didn't even notice that at first, actually thought its a sunlight artifact
VBTHING 1 year ago
Err, your description of the video is a little wrong. I think you'll find the Cornell vehicle started to pull away once MIT was alongside it (I believe the MIT vehicle successfully demonstrated its ability go around a stationary object). Therefore the Cornell was at fault... Its strange, but not entirely surprising, how the computer drivers make the same basic mistakes human drivers do!!
DJShadesUK 3 years ago
I have a hunch that they had interference with each other's LIDAR systems that close. Not sure who the fault is.. I guess one could argue they were both at fault. One should not have cut so close once passing, and the other should not have jammed in the gas. Thanks for the correction.
Firefaxx 3 years ago
Hi Firefaxx, thanks for your reply. Its nice to find someone on YouTube that doesn't instantly take offence to a comment that they don't agree with. What a breath of fresh air! :-) All the best my friend!
DJShadesUK 3 years ago
it's odd, but i find it computers so cute to watch driving, with their funny mistakes.
nvsvictor 2 years ago
DJShadesUK You're right, dude, ppl watch this from another angle
watch?v=CIKxObvqskk&feature=related
MIT made way enough room to overtake.
VBTHING 1 year ago
HI VBTHING. I saw the video you linked to too. You can clearly see, after viewing both videos that the MIT car was a good cars width away and half a vehicles length in front of the Cornell car when Cornell started to pull away. Its effectively the same as a human parked at the side of the road pulling out without checking the mirror first. The "parked" car pulling into traffic would be at fault.
DJShadesUK 1 year ago