lol. too many haters. Both amazing cars. Does anyone know that Honda actually helped to develop the BMW vanos system, which is similar to VTEC? Judging by the comments thats a no. lol
So funny the comments by some people. Like the guy who said "LOL! Honda vs. BMW there not even in the same league!". Thats why in Scca auto-x S2000 is A-stock car and E36 M is in slower B-Stock class. Both awesome cars but some people are just idiots.
For those who dont even have a car dont Bother talking.. Own one and u will understand that Honda Make good cars too.. Because something is more EXpensive doesnt mean ITs always the best.
for every person.
When u own an s2000 u will understand how fun it is to drive.. ITs not always about pulling faster than someone else in a straight line.
That S2000 was supercharged. An M3 is a full second faster in a straight line than the S2000. Check out Japanese Best Motoring videos and the S2000 cannot even put up a fight around Tsukuba circuit with the M3 in every video. M3 > S2000 any day.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
yeah and m3 is stock, i wana see u run my m3 lightwheight(clutch, carbon fibre hood&trunk, racing seats, no spare tire.), straight pipes, headers, hks cold air, chipped. and some more.
@SpeedKlz that was the CSL version of the m3. the s2k actually manages faster times at the tsukuba track, but in your defense the s2000 is a full second slower in the 1/4 mile race against an e46 M3. That i can agree with.
syupid fuck look up there what the video ownere wrote (its yellow color if u didnt know in comments) "the only thing the S2000 has is an exhaust and intake no super charge. """ who ever says something stupid fuck dont have a real car, maybe not even a car, a bike.
when you little kids have enough money to buy both toys and know the specs in side out, then talk. other wise go back to school, learn your english grammer and how to spell right. s2000 at mid range would of pulled that m3 easy, at 3-4k rpm the m3 would of pulled up but by then the speed of the s2k has already pummled to its peak, vtek smoked the m3 at that short dash. now had they done the long dash, the ///m would of took it. S2k is not a piece of shit. No your cars brokeass's.
These cars have almost identical performance specs (0-60 & 1/4 mile). But let's not forget the M3 at least 9 years old now, probably more. The fact that a car BMW released here in the mid 90's still has the performance to hang with the latest/best performing car Honda has to offer is impressive. Both of these are great cars. I drive an Integra GSR BTW, not an M3 (yet ;) ).
Fiveightandten you say you own a GSR and you say that the s2000 is there best car? Are you sure you know anything about honda? Since there best car is the Nsx.
I'm in the states, where the NSX is tagged as an Acura. The S2000 is the best performing car with a Honda badge on it here. The NSX is a fantastic car. But it's outdated, and outperformed by cars costing well under half the price now.
shut the fuck up!!! you're complaining about peoples grammar look at you, saying "would of" instead of would have so you go back to school you dumb piece of shit
First: M3's are slow? Yet they are under 5 seconds 0-60, run 12.. second 1/4m, and still have insane top end?
2nd: Too heavy yet they weigh 3300-3400lbs and with a few easy mods u can get them to 3000? Coupe even 3,400 is light
3rd: Loads of torque? WTF are u talkin about they have 333hp and only 240+ of torque. Yet they beat 400hp & 400 torque GTO's, and more. I love s2k's but when somebody is talkin out of their a** they need to be corrected
if there faster then why does the s2000 win in this case, modified or not it depends on the driver, go and skate you little skater boy, fucking keyboard warrior!
im not being a dick, but the e36 isnt under 5 seconds 0-60. and the euro spec has the 320bhp, but all american e36's which destroy the 42 model, but the american e36 has only 250 bhp and 236 tq and yea its 3400, and im a car guy i love the m3 and s2k, im just throwen out some info. the euro e36 is the same engine powoer as the american e42 just lighter and better handling. but the m3 is a fuycking champ hands down
lol. too many haters. Both amazing cars. Does anyone know that Honda actually helped to develop the BMW vanos system, which is similar to VTEC? Judging by the comments thats a no. lol
KS8730 1 year ago
S2k wins.... VTEC all day
h3avyduty84 1 year ago
yo vtec just kicked in ;-)
brentwood06 1 year ago 2
nice!!!!
twistedlekyam 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
s2000 is a girls car
ryondface 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yeah man s2000 is just for girls like Barbie or gays like Ken. Barbie in s2000 ist ok but Ken... ;)
BaxBmw 2 years ago
still beats an m3.
dc52002 2 years ago
The honda hasnt got any supercharger and eats the BMW alive...
Fightingfalcon85 3 years ago
So funny the comments by some people. Like the guy who said "LOL! Honda vs. BMW there not even in the same league!". Thats why in Scca auto-x S2000 is A-stock car and E36 M is in slower B-Stock class. Both awesome cars but some people are just idiots.
listedryan 4 years ago
u meant bmw is awesome car, i walk over s2000 like theyre not racing in my m3
cherniybumer16 3 years ago
For those who dont even have a car dont Bother talking.. Own one and u will understand that Honda Make good cars too.. Because something is more EXpensive doesnt mean ITs always the best.
for every person.
When u own an s2000 u will understand how fun it is to drive.. ITs not always about pulling faster than someone else in a straight line.
licksuck 4 years ago 17
I agree, it's quite immature to be overly obsessed with straight line speed. You're never going to have the fastest car.
andreiscv 3 years ago 7
supercharger +1
tamatama14 4 years ago
That S2000 was supercharged. An M3 is a full second faster in a straight line than the S2000. Check out Japanese Best Motoring videos and the S2000 cannot even put up a fight around Tsukuba circuit with the M3 in every video. M3 > S2000 any day.
SpeedKlz 4 years ago
the only thing the S2000 has is an exhaust and intake no super charge.
nekromanser 4 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah and m3 is stock, i wana see u run my m3 lightwheight(clutch, carbon fibre hood&trunk, racing seats, no spare tire.), straight pipes, headers, hks cold air, chipped. and some more.
cherniybumer16 3 years ago
@SpeedKlz that was the CSL version of the m3. the s2k actually manages faster times at the tsukuba track, but in your defense the s2000 is a full second slower in the 1/4 mile race against an e46 M3. That i can agree with.
tenjinnim 1 year ago
M3 > S2000
Nothing beats German Cars!
if you put a supercharger on the M3 im pretty sure it will burn the s2000 easily!
LOL! Honda vs. BMW there not even in the same league!
javdan23 4 years ago
yeah its a supercharger s2000 vs a turbo m3 LOL. m3 still lose!!!
licksuck 4 years ago
syupid fuck look up there what the video ownere wrote (its yellow color if u didnt know in comments) "the only thing the S2000 has is an exhaust and intake no super charge. """ who ever says something stupid fuck dont have a real car, maybe not even a car, a bike.
cherniybumer16 3 years ago
Yeah, thats a supercharger S2000..
cccp2007 4 years ago
Damn i was gona get an m3, after this video, s2000 is better looking and a better price, ALSO SUPER quicker too.. M3 = mshit
licksuck 4 years ago
you suck u cant afoord a geo metro, sorry but thats how it is nigga , (bmw=girls) i meant LOT OF GIRLS, MY EXPERIENCE) ni@@a
cherniybumer16 3 years ago
when you little kids have enough money to buy both toys and know the specs in side out, then talk. other wise go back to school, learn your english grammer and how to spell right. s2000 at mid range would of pulled that m3 easy, at 3-4k rpm the m3 would of pulled up but by then the speed of the s2k has already pummled to its peak, vtek smoked the m3 at that short dash. now had they done the long dash, the ///m would of took it. S2k is not a piece of shit. No your cars brokeass's.
ekaynine 5 years ago
These cars have almost identical performance specs (0-60 & 1/4 mile). But let's not forget the M3 at least 9 years old now, probably more. The fact that a car BMW released here in the mid 90's still has the performance to hang with the latest/best performing car Honda has to offer is impressive. Both of these are great cars. I drive an Integra GSR BTW, not an M3 (yet ;) ).
fiveightandten 5 years ago
Fiveightandten you say you own a GSR and you say that the s2000 is there best car? Are you sure you know anything about honda? Since there best car is the Nsx.
andydandy03 4 years ago
andydaandy03-
I'm in the states, where the NSX is tagged as an Acura. The S2000 is the best performing car with a Honda badge on it here. The NSX is a fantastic car. But it's outdated, and outperformed by cars costing well under half the price now.
fiveightandten 4 years ago
shut the fuck up!!! you're complaining about peoples grammar look at you, saying "would of" instead of would have so you go back to school you dumb piece of shit
smexxiiie 4 years ago
must be a supercharged S2000
berrada99 5 years ago
This video is crap ...the M3 is 343Hp the S2000 is a unuseless piece of shit with 240ch ( probably good for kid toys ) ///M3 best car ever
berrada99 5 years ago
money is nothing honda is everthing !!
ThUnDeRbErK 5 years ago
m3 should easily beat that cheap s2000
alaraburak 5 years ago
well in the video that cheap s2000 is better than that really expensive piece of shit that comes out of a dogs ass.
licksuck 4 years ago
Comment removed
jamiet16v 5 years ago
Wow your an idiot. Everything u said is wrong..
First: M3's are slow? Yet they are under 5 seconds 0-60, run 12.. second 1/4m, and still have insane top end?
2nd: Too heavy yet they weigh 3300-3400lbs and with a few easy mods u can get them to 3000? Coupe even 3,400 is light
3rd: Loads of torque? WTF are u talkin about they have 333hp and only 240+ of torque. Yet they beat 400hp & 400 torque GTO's, and more. I love s2k's but when somebody is talkin out of their a** they need to be corrected
ska8ter450 3 years ago
Performance
Acceleration (0-60 mph): 5 sec. Braking Distance (60-0 mph): 112 ft.
Base Number of Cylinders: 6 Base Engine Size: 3.2 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 6 Horsepower: 333 hp
Max Horsepower: 7900 rpm Torque: 262 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 4900 rpm Drive Type: RWD
Turning Circle: 36.1 ft.
talking out your ass mate
jamiet16v 3 years ago
looks you researched at and copy pasted from wikipedia hahahaha
dc52002 2 years ago
if there faster then why does the s2000 win in this case, modified or not it depends on the driver, go and skate you little skater boy, fucking keyboard warrior!
jamiet16v 3 years ago
jamie ur an idiot
my friend has an all white s2k with about 35K on it AP1 and he gets shit on by every M3 ive seen him race
i do agree it depends on the driver and in this case this M3 driver must have been horrible E36 or E46 M3 wins
pimp1021 2 years ago
im not being a dick, but the e36 isnt under 5 seconds 0-60. and the euro spec has the 320bhp, but all american e36's which destroy the 42 model, but the american e36 has only 250 bhp and 236 tq and yea its 3400, and im a car guy i love the m3 and s2k, im just throwen out some info. the euro e36 is the same engine powoer as the american e42 just lighter and better handling. but the m3 is a fuycking champ hands down
car2nr4d 2 years ago
fuck s2k fuck ya i will take 1 m3 over 2 s2000 well i will think about it a little tho maybe sell 1 s200
emadkkk 5 years ago
i kno da s2k is pretty fast, but i dont kno if it could have beaten an m3 without being modified.
liltiknartist 5 years ago