Fascinating. These 3D shapes, derived from 102 unique wave functions, allow for modular constructs of larger forms (molecules), through harmonics of goodness of fit (variably pliable Legos). Personally, I view them as "Not Knot Knots" of spacetime. It's the curvature that gives us, in part, the E/C^2.
@IX0o0XI I'm a bit late, but they are showing you how the different shapes relate to one another by showing the changes that can be made to get from one shape to another. It's related to how they are going to organize them all. Also, they are 2-D Representations of 3-D Sections of 4-D objects, specifically the animation of the transition between the shapes. The important thing is the 3-D objects really. I'd like to see where you get 5-D from. :/
@113Doctor hi, double-one. I'm just trying2get a handle on this stuff. I used to, as an artist, imagine form to be infinite, but now here's this table of forms and people have been working on this concept since the thirties... so I tried to take a look at it, but with New Scientist, one has2have a subscription first. all I got was they boiled this down to over 100 basic forms. but here comes the possibility of a "Los Alamos" "Dr. Frankenstein" scenario of the dark side of human nature in it ...
@paulhallart "but now here's this table of forms " I don't think they mean 'shape' the same way most people use it. I think maybe it's like topology, where something like a coffee cup is equivalent to a donut because you can distort (a stretchy) one into the other without cutting it, since it has the same number of holes and seams.
@ImMichaelTaylor -- so then the form atom is therefore the last morph-able entity before inmorphability and that may just afford the student with a certain utilitarian frame of reference i.e. this kind of periodic table which can then be used in such fields as perhaps architecture or engineering. or are they arriving at an understanding that these form atoms comprise some aspect of existence itself. otherwise lacking utility it still is valid as some sort of complex exercise in solid geomitry
@paulhallart "the last morph-able entity " That how it seems to me.
"are they arriving at an understanding that these form atoms comprise some aspect of existence itself. " I think they're hoping it is, but they haven't actually said as much.
I think each "shape" is a set of solutions to a polynomial, so I suppose any field of study which uses such equations could use the "table" to discover the most fundamental properties of a particular mathematical model.
@ImMichaelTaylor P.S. there's more detail on Coates' blog at imperial college, which is (replace spaces with dots) coates ma ic ac uk , then you scroll down to the link for "fano". When that page comes up you can put "press release" in the search box to see some pages with more examples.
Also, there's a more detailed article than the NS summary on internetchemie (dot) info, just search for "shapes".
@ImMichaelTaylor so then by the distillation of the morphistic shape into these minimizations described as their "atoms" one must assume they might be able to take things a bit further into the less imaginative aspect of functionality towards practicality and be able to form of them sort of "molecules" as it were in which they might be taken through their more complex aspects to achieve uses in such things as architecture, metallurgy, re-entry vehicles and so on.
@paulhallart I'm not sure results would be much use for ordinary 3d design at the human scale. I got the impression they were aiming more at the dimensions that are too small for us to see, such as some areas of theoretical physics deal with.
@ImMichaelTaylor indeed. that therefore means that there must be more things taking shape than meet the eye! not only are these shape atoms minimal in forms but also it seems mere nanometers in girth. perhaps such things a string theory and such.
atom is actually a Greek word for "smallest", kind of. so these guys are exploring the smallest shapes that can be gotten using certain criterion of as many dimensions that can b presently known, both tactile and hidden. They hang out at the Imperial College. By categorizing properties in a periodic table, they will open a way2understand form, never b4 realized. The concept's been around since the 1930's but this is a real step forward&can b computerized. so we'll see where they go with that.
is it just me or this audience on this channal is more ignorant than expected? i mean its a science and technology channel, one would expect some mature people.
@outlawkelb hi outie. may I contrib a observation: it appears as though the synthetic environment has had a denigrating effect on genetics. what we may be looking at is xtreme mutation. another thing might b that the internet isn't working as we thought it might've done. some new scientific data reveals a profound shift in the way people think because of the advent of the 'net. as trip six points out it's a real co cap d. The last shift was at the advent of printing a few hundred yrs ago...
I've thought sometimes of the geometric periodic table, but watching this bolws my mind, there must be an infinite number of this shapes. I wonder which rules are they using to classify
@unluckylion Um... No, actually videogames are like that because that's how 3D models are made, because computers can't calculate too many particles at once, so they just made surfaces flat.
Apparently these shapes get reduced to differential equations, and if the equation can't be broken down further - it gets called an 'atom' if it can, it gets called a 'molecule'.... the article links it to string theory... so... warning flag.
Ok, I think I understand what is being said. The last object (the one that looks like two river stones pushed together) has a ring going through it. As the ring changes position, the object to the right mutates, hinting that the ring is marking a cross-section. My understanding is that this is kindof like conics where a hyperbola, parabola, line, circle, point, and ellipse can be represented as a plane intersecting a cone. Am I close?
Shapes that can't be broken down to simpler shapes huh? I wish you told me more about the concept behind it, because any shape can be made smaller or be cut in half or downsized, sliced, diced, or otherwise be broken down into simpler shapes. Like balls or cubes or whatever... So what's the big idea about this? The shapes presented still look pretty darn complex.
@myshoescramp Well, for one, it's about shapes and has nothing to do with the periodic table of elements. It's a table of shapes... And there my knowledge ends as well. I wish they made the concept around it more clear too. But that's what you get from a 37 second video...
I've seen shapes of the electron probability cloud and also seen cymatic patterns. They are very similar except the clouds are around a sphere and the cymatics are on flat plates. I've learnt something from this lol
These shapes have been talked about in New Age spirituality for decades now. They are called "Sacred Geometry". It was also said that some people see them while tripping on DMT. There is also an artist named Alex Grey who tries to paint it
@djsuperstar717 Erm, mathematicians have always known about these shapes:
"In the 1930s, Gino Fano discovered nine two-dimensional atomic shapes, while research in the 1980s revealed 102 shapes in three dimensions. But these discoveries came in the form of lists, not organised groups, and never progressed to higher dimensions."
Whatever silly New Age Spirituality squacks have to say is irrelevant, the point of the video was that these shapes are now being organised by the properties.
People come to these videos and complain due to short sightedness. Clearly they are not the kinds of people who should be allowed within reach of any science video. [["Science is interesting... If you don't like it, fuck off"]]
@McPrfctday People are more likely to complaint about shortcomings of the content than shortsightedness. This could have been explained in more detail, actually teaching people about these shapes, yet they only give news about them being compiled... I can make compilations too, but why it this science? They fail there.
We have used geometry as a tool to calculate complicated problems relating to the normal periodic table of elements but we have never taken the step to show how the shapes them selfs are fundamental to nature. I love this, and it means third grade geometry just got a lot cooler. Instead of a triangle being an abstract idea it can now be seen as fundamental part of how the the universe works. I wish the video was longer!
@IronChefWannabe I am from england but where I am from has nothing to do with what I said. If there is a point to it, why not just tell me? Because there isn't one...
oh god, does this mean my kids will have this as their homework and ask me how the hell to do it and i'll say, "you're on your own, in my day all we had to do was memorize a few elements, you're screwed"
Ok? This video explains this horribly, and there's no new info in the full article. Are these 3d? and if so why are they changing shape? Can you explain anything to us, at least if you're reading the comments? Thanks.
I saw a full hour program about these shapes and I did'nt understand it sadly. In such a short video I don't think many ppl will get it either. However, I liked that the doughnut was one of these shapes!!
@Orion688 It is so very upsetting to see these people on scientific videos, it reminds me how the most of Earth's population is structured: ignorant and proud of it.
It is not unreasonable that most prefer to delude themselves into grasping the absolute truth by a non coherent, simplistically sluggish thought like "god did it" instead to actually read, search and learn something.
This sounds more like topology than string theory. The article links to almost no useful information so I have no idea what this little clip is referring to.
they don't know s&%t. hey newscientist...report on how all the elements are becoming unstable. report on the elements that we aren't taught.....come on....something NEW pls.
i admit this went over my head but i wont stoop low enough to blame the mathematicians for the that fact, i will go and study. shame everyone wants everything spoon fed to them...
your videos were getting good at one point but not anymore, that was kool but i wish you included which atoms were which! im a little lost, i thought you were meant to teach ppl not just leave them wondering.
How does any of this has anything to do with atoms?
First they start talking about atoms, and shapes, and I think that these are shapes from which atoms are made, but then they mess up everything even more and I have no idea wtf this is seposed to be.
how can you not break a shape into anything smaller ><
"these are the basic building blocks of all shapes"
Well they dont look basic. And if you handed me any of the shapes they had here i dont think i would be able to build anything with them..... Nothing i can think off. Nope
bueno...
EltBerserker 1 day ago
Fascinating. These 3D shapes, derived from 102 unique wave functions, allow for modular constructs of larger forms (molecules), through harmonics of goodness of fit (variably pliable Legos). Personally, I view them as "Not Knot Knots" of spacetime. It's the curvature that gives us, in part, the E/C^2.
ohwhererehwho 2 months ago
Right... 3D shapes...
These are 4 and 5D shapes.. -_-
IX0o0XI 11 months ago
@IX0o0XI I'm a bit late, but they are showing you how the different shapes relate to one another by showing the changes that can be made to get from one shape to another. It's related to how they are going to organize them all. Also, they are 2-D Representations of 3-D Sections of 4-D objects, specifically the animation of the transition between the shapes. The important thing is the 3-D objects really. I'd like to see where you get 5-D from. :/
Ryat51 5 months ago
COOOOOOOLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:3
SpaceMasterRahel 11 months ago
I dont understand how the smalles building blocks has a smooth surface if pi goes on forever :S
Reuben961 11 months ago
woa!
this is really cool
i like the idea of a periodic table of geometry
roidroid 1 year ago
I swear they're just making stuff up now! :)
mackat4ck 1 year ago
What the fuck
EclecticSceptic 1 year ago
@113Doctor hi, double-one. I'm just trying2get a handle on this stuff. I used to, as an artist, imagine form to be infinite, but now here's this table of forms and people have been working on this concept since the thirties... so I tried to take a look at it, but with New Scientist, one has2have a subscription first. all I got was they boiled this down to over 100 basic forms. but here comes the possibility of a "Los Alamos" "Dr. Frankenstein" scenario of the dark side of human nature in it ...
paulhallart 1 year ago
@paulhallart "but now here's this table of forms " I don't think they mean 'shape' the same way most people use it. I think maybe it's like topology, where something like a coffee cup is equivalent to a donut because you can distort (a stretchy) one into the other without cutting it, since it has the same number of holes and seams.
ImMichaelTaylor 11 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor -- so then the form atom is therefore the last morph-able entity before inmorphability and that may just afford the student with a certain utilitarian frame of reference i.e. this kind of periodic table which can then be used in such fields as perhaps architecture or engineering. or are they arriving at an understanding that these form atoms comprise some aspect of existence itself. otherwise lacking utility it still is valid as some sort of complex exercise in solid geomitry
paulhallart 11 months ago
@paulhallart "the last morph-able entity " That how it seems to me.
"are they arriving at an understanding that these form atoms comprise some aspect of existence itself. " I think they're hoping it is, but they haven't actually said as much.
I think each "shape" is a set of solutions to a polynomial, so I suppose any field of study which uses such equations could use the "table" to discover the most fundamental properties of a particular mathematical model.
ImMichaelTaylor 11 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor P.S. there's more detail on Coates' blog at imperial college, which is (replace spaces with dots) coates ma ic ac uk , then you scroll down to the link for "fano". When that page comes up you can put "press release" in the search box to see some pages with more examples.
Also, there's a more detailed article than the NS summary on internetchemie (dot) info, just search for "shapes".
ImMichaelTaylor 11 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor so then by the distillation of the morphistic shape into these minimizations described as their "atoms" one must assume they might be able to take things a bit further into the less imaginative aspect of functionality towards practicality and be able to form of them sort of "molecules" as it were in which they might be taken through their more complex aspects to achieve uses in such things as architecture, metallurgy, re-entry vehicles and so on.
paulhallart 11 months ago
@paulhallart I'm not sure results would be much use for ordinary 3d design at the human scale. I got the impression they were aiming more at the dimensions that are too small for us to see, such as some areas of theoretical physics deal with.
ImMichaelTaylor 11 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor indeed. that therefore means that there must be more things taking shape than meet the eye! not only are these shape atoms minimal in forms but also it seems mere nanometers in girth. perhaps such things a string theory and such.
paulhallart 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hеỵ soṙṙy foṙ ᑲеiոɡ οƒf ṭοpⅰϲ, ხսṭ I'm sрṙeaⅾⅰnց mỵ еҳ ցіṙɭfriеnd'ѕ seх tаре аṙound. Wȟỵ? Weǀɭ, ხeⅽаuse ѕȟе'ѕ а ᑲiṭᴄհ. Sȟe deseṙⅴеd ⅰṭ, sο ցο аհeaⅾ anⅾ ᴡаtⅽհ iṭ. Thе ǀіnḱ iѕ ᴏո my ρroḟiǀе (ᴢip pаssᴡοṙⅾ iѕ 123)
xdddddddxdxddxxxdxxx 1 year ago
beticanmakeyousaywhat?!
sorry8140 1 year ago
atom is actually a Greek word for "smallest", kind of. so these guys are exploring the smallest shapes that can be gotten using certain criterion of as many dimensions that can b presently known, both tactile and hidden. They hang out at the Imperial College. By categorizing properties in a periodic table, they will open a way2understand form, never b4 realized. The concept's been around since the 1930's but this is a real step forward&can b computerized. so we'll see where they go with that.
paulhallart 1 year ago
I like these random 3d shapes
pchackal 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
poor children
RooTerKyberian 1 year ago
poor children
RooTerKyberian 1 year ago
is it just me or this audience on this channal is more ignorant than expected? i mean its a science and technology channel, one would expect some mature people.
outlawkelb 1 year ago 20
@outlawkelb you're on the planet of the apes. expect stupidity to infiltrate every aspect of your life for the rest of your life :(
djancak 1 year ago
@outlawkelb ya, welcome to the internet! :D
666norton420 1 year ago
@outlawkelb hi outie. may I contrib a observation: it appears as though the synthetic environment has had a denigrating effect on genetics. what we may be looking at is xtreme mutation. another thing might b that the internet isn't working as we thought it might've done. some new scientific data reveals a profound shift in the way people think because of the advent of the 'net. as trip six points out it's a real co cap d. The last shift was at the advent of printing a few hundred yrs ago...
paulhallart 1 year ago
@outlawkelb I have a big pernis
squeehunter 6 months ago
@outlawkelb you're looking for ted.com. YouTube is a soapbox for orangutans.
mrdavetail 1 month ago
What are the formulas for these geometric atoms ?
Steaphany 1 year ago
I've thought sometimes of the geometric periodic table, but watching this bolws my mind, there must be an infinite number of this shapes. I wonder which rules are they using to classify
painfield 1 year ago
thats so awesome
z3253304 1 year ago
that explains everything! clearly they had found a gap in space-time continuum!
Shketri 1 year ago
the basic 3D bilding block is a polygon! Play more computergames, than you will notice... do i get a article in nature or science now?
unluckylion 1 year ago
@unluckylion do you even know the shape of a polygon?
outlawkelb 1 year ago
@unluckylion Um... No, actually videogames are like that because that's how 3D models are made, because computers can't calculate too many particles at once, so they just made surfaces flat.
FutureInventions 1 year ago
but will they run crysis?
PaXx 1 year ago
I'll show YOU a multidimentional form..
kravenraze 1 year ago 3
Might be useful data to use in protein folding?
Paxmax 1 year ago
But will they blend?
RDJim 1 year ago
Comment removed
RDJim 1 year ago
uhhhhh...
GuppyPal 1 year ago
Now that is cool.
437thx1138 1 year ago
This is a freekin weird idea, i love it.
MaBuSt 1 year ago 2
Apparently these shapes get reduced to differential equations, and if the equation can't be broken down further - it gets called an 'atom' if it can, it gets called a 'molecule'.... the article links it to string theory... so... warning flag.
quietthomas 1 year ago 3
Ok, I think I understand what is being said. The last object (the one that looks like two river stones pushed together) has a ring going through it. As the ring changes position, the object to the right mutates, hinting that the ring is marking a cross-section. My understanding is that this is kindof like conics where a hyperbola, parabola, line, circle, point, and ellipse can be represented as a plane intersecting a cone. Am I close?
thepeff 1 year ago
I cant understand you over the sound of all this SCIENCE going on.
TigerSlashX 1 year ago
Comment removed
EdouardDubois 1 year ago
@TigerSlashX
The correct technical term has an exclamation point at the end (SCIENCE!).
Also, I don't understand this video, what about the sphere and the cube, aren't those pretty basic 3D shapes?
EdouardDubois 1 year ago
thats so weird.. i wont be able to ever understand this.
geico1212 1 year ago
This is awesome...
caseygtr 1 year ago
wait, what?
Spoonergasm 1 year ago 38
@Spoonergasm X) u didn't read ur book at your Chemistry class didn't you?
GMdark11 1 year ago
@GMdark11 lmao I'm actually a chemistry major XD
Spoonergasm 1 year ago
@Spoonergasm XD READ UR BOOK!!!!
GMdark11 1 year ago
@GMdark11 but this is a math thing! these are the smallest components of shapes... it doesn't even involve chemistry! haha
Spoonergasm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Spoonergasm Can you teach me everything I need to know about REDOX equations?
Enlight3nd 1 year ago
Shapes that can't be broken down to simpler shapes huh? I wish you told me more about the concept behind it, because any shape can be made smaller or be cut in half or downsized, sliced, diced, or otherwise be broken down into simpler shapes. Like balls or cubes or whatever... So what's the big idea about this? The shapes presented still look pretty darn complex.
Alphasys 1 year ago
you more you know... DADADA
sharpezor 1 year ago
How are they going to teach you this? Magnesium looks like this. . . Got it? Good because that's on your test.
myshoescramp 1 year ago 2
@myshoescramp Well, for one, it's about shapes and has nothing to do with the periodic table of elements. It's a table of shapes... And there my knowledge ends as well. I wish they made the concept around it more clear too. But that's what you get from a 37 second video...
Alphasys 1 year ago
Awh. I was really hoping for a new model of the shape of an atom.
johnsdevid 1 year ago 3
I've seen shapes of the electron probability cloud and also seen cymatic patterns. They are very similar except the clouds are around a sphere and the cymatics are on flat plates. I've learnt something from this lol
derman077 1 year ago
These shapes have been talked about in New Age spirituality for decades now. They are called "Sacred Geometry". It was also said that some people see them while tripping on DMT. There is also an artist named Alex Grey who tries to paint it
djsuperstar717 1 year ago
@djsuperstar717 Erm, mathematicians have always known about these shapes:
"In the 1930s, Gino Fano discovered nine two-dimensional atomic shapes, while research in the 1980s revealed 102 shapes in three dimensions. But these discoveries came in the form of lists, not organised groups, and never progressed to higher dimensions."
Whatever silly New Age Spirituality squacks have to say is irrelevant, the point of the video was that these shapes are now being organised by the properties.
giansideros 1 year ago
People come to these videos and complain due to short sightedness. Clearly they are not the kinds of people who should be allowed within reach of any science video. [["Science is interesting... If you don't like it, fuck off"]]
McPrfctday 1 year ago
@McPrfctday People are more likely to complaint about shortcomings of the content than shortsightedness. This could have been explained in more detail, actually teaching people about these shapes, yet they only give news about them being compiled... I can make compilations too, but why it this science? They fail there.
Alphasys 1 year ago 2
They could have given more info :/
FlumenSanctiViti 1 year ago
Might as well stare into a kaleidoscope. . .
ErostheEpic 1 year ago
they're all round
larry89 1 year ago
why?
SCARREDMIND 1 year ago
damn it! the foreign lady is narrating again
AVerbene 1 year ago 3
@AVerbene She does it in comprehensible English though. Not giving much information to go on, but still...
Alphasys 1 year ago
It's breaking my mind!!! >_<
TMNWG 1 year ago
Periodic Table of Videos, brought it up a week ago... :)
ricande 1 year ago
Can you make napkins look like that?
GreatGungHolio 1 year ago
finally something good from this channel.
BFX9000 1 year ago
cool story bro
Chaowdur 1 year ago 3
If this carries on I'm going to have to unsubscribe. When I woke up this morning I didn't have self esteem issues. A different guy is going to bed.
Infidelerious 1 year ago
Worry not.. they'll fix them splittable with next patch.
gosucoaching 1 year ago
I always thought shapes are self explanatory.
madjimms 1 year ago
but will it blend?
tommylodz2004 1 year ago
@tommylodz2004 i never got that joke. What's it from?
OfficialHollow 1 year ago
@OfficialHollow Search "will it blend" on youtube.
Unnamed0909 1 year ago
I thought my head hurt BEFORE I watched this?!
azayles 1 year ago
"I know this makes no sense to you whatsoever but all shapes are made of these. Seriously."
Pretty much what I got from this.
scoopapa 1 year ago
We have used geometry as a tool to calculate complicated problems relating to the normal periodic table of elements but we have never taken the step to show how the shapes them selfs are fundamental to nature. I love this, and it means third grade geometry just got a lot cooler. Instead of a triangle being an abstract idea it can now be seen as fundamental part of how the the universe works. I wish the video was longer!
techhungry1 1 year ago 3
Is there any point to this shit?
fatalist6o9 1 year ago
@fatalist6o9
you must be from alabama
IronChefWannabe 1 year ago
@IronChefWannabe I am from england but where I am from has nothing to do with what I said. If there is a point to it, why not just tell me? Because there isn't one...
fatalist6o9 1 year ago
oh god, does this mean my kids will have this as their homework and ask me how the hell to do it and i'll say, "you're on your own, in my day all we had to do was memorize a few elements, you're screwed"
WhatIfShow 1 year ago
bullshit
Ramsez 1 year ago
ummm. . . . HUH?
GabrielKnightz 1 year ago
Ok? This video explains this horribly, and there's no new info in the full article. Are these 3d? and if so why are they changing shape? Can you explain anything to us, at least if you're reading the comments? Thanks.
FutureInventions 1 year ago
Um...... whatt?
ScottishAtheist 1 year ago
cant be broken down nay further? of coure you can!!!. especially the testicle looking one
kralalrulz 1 year ago
@kralalrulz I hope thats not what you think testicles are suppose to look like. lol Go to the doctor man.
techhungry1 1 year ago
whatttttt
residentevil808 1 year ago
wow. that's interesting.
RealKeenan 1 year ago
Take that science you're not the only one with a periodic table now.
Metroidzard 1 year ago
I saw a full hour program about these shapes and I did'nt understand it sadly. In such a short video I don't think many ppl will get it either. However, I liked that the doughnut was one of these shapes!!
holsson85 1 year ago
a lot of idiot commenters on these newscientist vids.
a lot of closed minds and arrogance.
Destro7000 1 year ago
Uh?
Infidelerious 1 year ago
Stop complaining that you haven't learned anything. Click the damn links to the full articles.
Orion688 1 year ago 53
@Orion688 It is so very upsetting to see these people on scientific videos, it reminds me how the most of Earth's population is structured: ignorant and proud of it.
It is not unreasonable that most prefer to delude themselves into grasping the absolute truth by a non coherent, simplistically sluggish thought like "god did it" instead to actually read, search and learn something.
minotarr 1 year ago 5
Comment removed
JassiusJay 1 year ago
This sounds more like topology than string theory. The article links to almost no useful information so I have no idea what this little clip is referring to.
Ormaaj 1 year ago
i think most of Newscientists subscribers only subbed because they're such an easy target for troll comments. I'm not saying I didnt.
KennyGJE 1 year ago
Universe is made out of shapes not atoms and whole information about the universe is contained in it's geometry.
infinummjb 1 year ago
PORN
GunitForLyfe 1 year ago
they don't know s&%t. hey newscientist...report on how all the elements are becoming unstable. report on the elements that we aren't taught.....come on....something NEW pls.
itstime4change13 1 year ago
My penis can make those shapes as well. (yes, I'm that mature)
TheRealSweedie 1 year ago
uuuuuuum i dont believe this
yairoka 1 year ago
i admit this went over my head but i wont stoop low enough to blame the mathematicians for the that fact, i will go and study. shame everyone wants everything spoon fed to them...
DjDedan 1 year ago 4
your videos were getting good at one point but not anymore, that was kool but i wish you included which atoms were which! im a little lost, i thought you were meant to teach ppl not just leave them wondering.
screamjackson 1 year ago
All multidimensions? them if i want to see an object for n dimension it would made of a group of those objects ?
DraskyVanderhoff 1 year ago
So THAT's how they make porn?
wait.. did i misunderstand the two-word explanation?
GronTheMighty 1 year ago
fake and gay...did he died... two camels in a tiny car... glitch in the matrix...
tahboobi 1 year ago 2
This changed my life...
kickit246 1 year ago
um arent they 4D not 3D..?
7171997007 1 year ago
I expect longer explanation.
MarkoKraguljac 1 year ago
ummmmm.....
TheNamesBettyNyahhh 1 year ago
What about string theory?
kazimann 1 year ago
@kazimann
Can't be proven
Yet....
Enjoy your bloatscience
SonarWavePulse 1 year ago
cant be broken down anymore? so what are they made from
refill1234567 1 year ago
I will tell my children, and my childrens children about this day!
SlashDotDash121 1 year ago
lol woot wait what, these are what atoms ar... whaaaaaaaat?
Smallest 3d shapes? Seriously wtf is that?
Ilamarea 1 year ago
@Ilamarea your subscribed to new scientist, and you don't know what an atom is?
JM12101 1 year ago
@JM12101
How does any of this has anything to do with atoms?
First they start talking about atoms, and shapes, and I think that these are shapes from which atoms are made, but then they mess up everything even more and I have no idea wtf this is seposed to be.
how can you not break a shape into anything smaller ><
Ilamarea 1 year ago
"these are the basic building blocks of all shapes"
Well they dont look basic. And if you handed me any of the shapes they had here i dont think i would be able to build anything with them..... Nothing i can think off. Nope
NicosMind 1 year ago
what... ok, have i learnt anything from this?
marcarmstrong88 1 year ago 50
@marcarmstrong88 if you listened yes :)
Shockszzbyyous 1 year ago
@marcarmstrong88 If you haven't then the joke's on you. Unsub or shut up.
Koujinkamu 1 year ago
@marcarmstrong88 possibly that you are a homosexual?
troglodyte3344 1 year ago
@marcarmstrong88 you've learnt there are smarter people than you
scullyy 1 year ago
@scullyy lol of course i already know that.
marcarmstrong88 1 year ago
@marcarmstrong88 You've learned that the shapes of the minutest building blocks of all matter are being catalogued for you convenience.
McPrfctday 1 year ago
@marcarmstrong88 no because your a fucking ignoramus like the rest of the populace.
if you knew physics and chemistry, this video is plain beautiful
fcdog555 1 year ago
Comment removed
marcarmstrong88 1 year ago
explain?
s23b 1 year ago
9th.
LOTR lol
Ilamarea 1 year ago
Dumb mathematicians!!! Hello!?! People have cancer!!!
coolman9999uk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@coolman9999uk
"Dumb mathematicians!!! Hello!?! People have cancer!!!"
You shouldn't 'count' on mathematicians to cure cancer anyways..
gilgameshismist 1 year ago
I came
gj75845 1 year ago
hmm....? i have to read more on this one
luckystrke 1 year ago
4th
AndrewlVl 1 year ago
well that's interesting...
Meninx87 1 year ago 61
elephant sex
IKNOWITSADUMBCOMMENT 1 year ago
third
IKNOWITSADUMBCOMMENT 1 year ago
interesting...
photoshopknight 1 year ago
first
IKNOWITSADUMBCOMMENT 1 year ago