Added: 2 years ago
From: ntfh
Views: 2,957
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • MORE COFFEE YA

  • MORE COFFE YA

  • CREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED!

  • ... I didn't know this=D I was convinced that you were now forced to use the minimum range for the basilisk now... Yay! My basilisks are useful again^^

  • It's a rule for vehicles that I did not makea point to tell eeryone in the past, because, in tournament, I would catch people feeling secure by getting all there units under 36". Then I would direct fire thier faces :P But yes, it's in the rulebook. This is why it specifically stated that the griffon and colossus can not fire direct. Funny thing is, the bassie still didn't have min direct fire range in 4th ed either. Keep on gaming!

  • "it burns when i pee" :D

  • go see the medic.

  • lol it burns when i pee

  • I love the vid, I think that the basilisk firing direct or indirect has a minimum range of 36.

  • I could be wrong or right :) but anyway keep up the good videos its nice to see another keen guard player out in the world. Smiting Xeno's where ever possible :)

  • Well, you thought wrong, but thanks for watching and commenting. other replied comment is the rules reference.

    Which is why there is notes on the griffon and colossus entires saying they MUST fire indirect only.

  • 40K Rulebook 5th Ed.

    Page 58. Second Column.

    Ordnance Barrage Weapons

    -"If fired Directly at the target, they are treated exactly like normal ordance weapons (ignoring the minimum range in the weapon's profile)."

  • Thanks alot :) you have just made my day :) I wish you the best ntfh :) and please keep making the videos :)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more