It looks like you run arma 2 good can i get some help,i have arma 2 and i have freeze lag my specs are: AMD Phenom II X2 521 3.50GHz Nvidia GTX 560ti
I have about 60fps but when often i get 5 secends to play then it freezes for 10 secends please help sorry about bad englash and ill sub if you help me out
@TheXGamingChicken I'm pretty sure it's your CPU. Arma 2 is meant to run on a quad core CPU not a dual core. I had the same problems when I had my Athlon x2 250. Now i have i5 2500k and no problems whatsoever.
It looks like you run arma 2 good can i get some help,i have arma 2 and i have freeze lag my specs are: AMD Phenom II X2 521 3.50GHz Nvidia GTX 560ti
I have about 60fps but when often i get 5 secends to play then it freezes for 10 secends please help sorry about bad englash and ill sub if you help me out
hum just to be sure, it means even with a SLI of 580 GTX you couldn't max this 2009 game visual settings out? Woa that's even more massive demands than GTA4 then
@LordTakahashi Probably very high, Ive played arma for 3 years now with 4GB ram the GeForece 310 and an i4 with windows 7 home premium on medium graphics and no lag at all.
Is this empty map in mission editor? Try it with a little war on the ground;] How about 20troops vs 40troops and maybe some t72s vs abrams? Mission at night? Empty map is nothing my friend.
@Maxuskrachus I know this from title but showing this in options is like two kids arguing and one of it says: "I bet you dont belive me! Ill proove you this" Its kinda sad.
Well, setting your visual prefs in ArmA is kinda twitchy thing, one time you got it all right just get Aliasing like crazy, other time you get a smooth picture but 5fps, etc...
with a recording program , it always takes away some frame rate's. but in real time without one you would imagine it has more framerates. Great video. what do you think about i5 2500k 3.3 ghz with a gtx560 ?
AMAZING framerate man.. i just ordered a new mobo and cpu like 3.6 ghz to play take on helicopters and arma 2. hope it works good. still running a gtx 260
@booommmful Sure, but is their custom mission making? How about a map like in the video? There's only one map that big in BF3. This game was made in 2009 and I think it's better than BF3. And don't say I'm an Arma fanboy, because I've only played it for 20 minutes, and I have around 3 days total spent in BF3.
@hellawag3 I agree. If BF3 had ANY modding at all then it would completely dominate. But sadly, DICE feels the need to make the game as difficult to even slightly change as possible.
@zekeWN 460 v2's they are factory over clocked... but i MAY bump thim up a little more time to time voiding the warranty.. but hey the stay at 53 Celsius so its alright
got mine up and running at everything maxed out at 1920x1200 resolution. its not really graphically demanding its requires more cpu n only takes about 1gb memory in task manager so 2gb system with half decent gpu will work fine as long as your cpu is good.. its like the oposite of bf3 i got a hdd failing on me after so many years and it runs smooth to me on a gtx480 and a cheap amd 945cpu 2gb ram.. its a good game :D
i dunno why everyone thinks arma 2 needs a beast of a video card i find the game benefits more from cpu power and as long as your video card is not a budget one or from an old series does fine.
i say this because my 4850 ran the game looking nice... upgraded to 6950 and frames are more or less the same (heavy cpu bottleneck) and this misconception that Arma 2 needs a super computer is silly... a 4850 with the cheapest quad AMD is not a super computer!
given that the HD 6320 is a laptop chip i wouldn't want to tell you yes, and i cannot provide you any benchmarks, also dont know your RAM amount of the CPU.
i don't recommend serious gaming on any laptop as usually they aren't the best for gaming and you get considerably less bang for the buck, paired with a solid cpu it might be able to handle it but definitely not with many effects on.
your best bet would be to download the free version of the game and see for yourself.
- Graphics card with 256 MiB VRAM and Shader Model 3.0
your video is 512mb SM 5.0 and dx11 based, so it would appear that it could run the game but like i said i don't put much faith in laptops for gaming.
it would be quite the stretch, like i said try the free version out and see how it runs and if it runs ok you may want to pick up the full game + expansion, then you can run mods etc
no harm in trying the free version! i would think you would get pretty low performance but maybe on lower settings with low visibility (its not as bad as it sounds, rarely do you need to see super far in the game world) it would be over 24 fps and playable enough for casual gaming.
@3dwardXP I ran the game on very low settings, with a 800x600 screen resolution, and got an average 10-20 FPS. That's honestly not too shabby, considering this laptop cost $300
I run it near max with 2x6870s in crossfire but I need more VRAM to put textures and that at Very High, but I will prob still be playing this game by the time I get a new video card.
@ghos7bear BF3 is also running a lot less behind the scenes. With ARMA it has to run all the sim aspect, and then run all the dynamic ai for the entire 200km map. Not to mention the graphical aspect.
bf3 45 fps on ultra, 60+ fps on low.... arma 2 28-50 fps on highest settings, with 5k view distance (depending heavily on the mission and situation)
bf3 is very well optimized and more eye candy then anything else, arma 2 is a behemoth of a game with much scripting / AI / view distance. BF3 likes to have a very nice video card and can deal with a weaker cpu. Arma 2 likes a good video card but only to a certain point and benefits more from a very fast cpu.
@davedavito Yeah, and one thing why it's more demanding, because the engine of Battlefield 3 (Frostbite) is much more better optimized than ArmA 2s one. I really hope that ArmA 3 is going to have better optimization in it's engine. Then I would play it. :D
Don't get me wrong though, ArmA 2 is an awesome game but I cannot play it on high settings without choppy FPS, and I don't accept anything under high-setting. Maybe I'm just a perfectionist. xD
@Maxuskrachus hey stupid do u think ur cool now? ever played bf2? u can bearely bealive it the same game sarie as bf3. idon´t like bf3 but it is really good grafics. i like games whit mods i played projekt realiyt really often but i don´t like how u get kicked before somebody warns you. BUY BF2 CHECK OUT BF2 MODS ATT MODDB AND U UNDERSTAND Y I LOVE BF
@davedavito Damn, thats some fine grammar you got going on there kid. I hope to hell your not British... As, no English man should be that bad at his own language.
@Gazjohnful no i´m not english i´m from sweden and i was kind of angry. where does it stand that i am from great brittian (don´t give a shit how u spell britain
@davedavito You spelt it right the second time... And I was only pointing out that your butchery of the English language made me hope you were not English that's all... with your first comment you put, you cant fault my reasoning... anyway, good day.
Nothing compares to ArmA, NOTHING, okay, APB is well underway but still cannot compete, it's good though, and BF sucks donkeyballs, modded or not.
My opinion, if you like BF2 thats your personal preference, it's a kiddogame though (my opinion again) where ArmA is "As close to war as you ever want to get".
No prejudice at all, i had BF2 on my PC, with all addons, BF is a game in which your only objective is to capture a flag and hold it until you get overrun by the enemy (totally unrealistic). In OFP and ArmA the amount of possible objectives: infinite, the amount of scenarios: infinite, user generated mods addons and missions: infinite (check ArmADB), the size of AO: to large to cover, realism: at every corner, the price: 1/4 of what EA wants for a game 5 years old now.
@BrutalGamez But Crysis with graphical mods beats the living daylight out of BF3 when it comes to vegetation and landscape. Truly. BF3 looks so nice cause it has over-exposure and a ton of contrast.
Damn, watching that beautiful baby with all those missiles unused is like watching a woman with a big ass bending over towards you and saying, "not today honey."
@sputnikrobert His point is that he can maxed out Arma 2 without his pc exploding. Arma 2 is a very demanding game specially this map which is about 220 km. Very massive.
The reason why Arma 2 takes alot isn't so much becuase of the graphics it's the CPU. It has to process alot of information on what your doing, the AI are doing, etc etc it's really not like Crysis in this aspect.
@VideoRoom207 My old GT 240 could play ArmA 2 decently, it cant max the graphics out, but it can run it at Medium graphics which still looks nice on ArmA 2. And plus its only $50 ;)
I tried to play it on the lowest settings but my computer still couldn't handle it =/ . It looked terrible as well. Original OFP looks better at Arma 2's lowest settings. Hope to be able to play it decently one day.
ok so i have the same settings you do.. no lag.. and a gtx 460.. how come my arma looks like total shit and yours doesnt??? even with out the 10000 visibility?
How much did your computer cost?
SilentWalk18 22 hours ago
You really don't need a GTX 580 for Arma 2...
Jewifer333x2 5 days ago 2
how big is the island?
TheMrUnztopable 6 days ago
i was looking for a damage on vehicles mod...nothing so far
TheBByamashiro 1 week ago
Yee, 10.0000 visibility distance, but 20 fps...
o0Lvxian0o 1 week ago
It looks like you run arma 2 good can i get some help,i have arma 2 and i have freeze lag my specs are: AMD Phenom II X2 521 3.50GHz Nvidia GTX 560ti
I have about 60fps but when often i get 5 secends to play then it freezes for 10 secends please help sorry about bad englash and ill sub if you help me out
TheXGamingChicken 1 week ago
@TheXGamingChicken I'm pretty sure it's your CPU. Arma 2 is meant to run on a quad core CPU not a dual core. I had the same problems when I had my Athlon x2 250. Now i have i5 2500k and no problems whatsoever.
THEWHlTEGUY 6 days ago
@THEWHlTEGUY same here
barepola 2 days ago
It looks like you run arma 2 good can i get some help,i have arma 2 and i have freeze lag my specs are: AMD Phenom II X2 521 3.50GHz Nvidia GTX 560ti
I have about 60fps but when often i get 5 secends to play then it freezes for 10 secends please help sorry about bad englash and ill sub if you help me out
TheXGamingChicken 1 week ago
SHOOT THE FUCKING A-10 ASSHOLE!!!
pancho7800 1 week ago
1:01 Headphones rape...
LucasB4dm4n 1 week ago
so thats why nasa needs those supercomputers
raviool 1 week ago
Super AI lol
gunhugger16 1 week ago
WHOO great eye site u got there what 100/100 vision
SuperSabio111 1 week ago
The Nasa has just called, they want their computer back.
onimischa 2 weeks ago
Wooohhooo
CzechTerminator 2 weeks ago
visibility rate OVER 9000!!!!!!!!!!!!
ZiggyMan934 2 weeks ago
This looks awesome!!
shawn2007g 2 weeks ago
CRASH IT
THEGAMEMASTER9991 2 weeks ago
TURN INTO A JET!!!!
BOMB THE RUSSIA!!!
CRASH INTO A TANK!!!!
NOW IM DEAD!!!!
LIKABOSS!!!
EliteDeltaTeam 2 weeks ago 2
hum just to be sure, it means even with a SLI of 580 GTX you couldn't max this 2009 game visual settings out? Woa that's even more massive demands than GTA4 then
freeedom22 2 weeks ago
Hey, isn't ArmA 3 coming out? It'll be my first ArmA, should I wait for it?
Sonypony458 3 weeks ago
@Sonypony458
You can pick Operation Arrowhead up for about a tenner off Steam, get that while you wait and get used to the controls :)
mayhem380 2 weeks ago
i called and i want my computer back.
metagunify 3 weeks ago
The nasa want their PC back !
GamingAtGermany 3 weeks ago
My computer lags like crazy on lowest settings. Damn you. >.>
SlimySnail44 3 weeks ago
ArmA is such a fuckin sweet game, no other like it
BucketBoi420 3 weeks ago
So Quick Question. My Build is:
i7-2600k
16GB RAM
Windows 7 pro
GTX 580 (Just one)
750W PSU
What settings could i run this game at with no lag like this video?
LordTakahashi 3 weeks ago
@LordTakahashi Probably very high, Ive played arma for 3 years now with 4GB ram the GeForece 310 and an i4 with windows 7 home premium on medium graphics and no lag at all.
Valkryie1337 3 weeks ago
Holy fuck
IAmTheStig320 3 weeks ago
and what now -.-
pR05t0 3 weeks ago
I remember that...We beat the hell outa those security guards to get this computer XD
XBrokenwingsX98 3 weeks ago
by far one of the best looking DX9 games imo
MrGeforcerFX 3 weeks ago
Ok, new video will be posted tonight, this one using my updated computer with 580s in SLI and some combat action.
johnlnichols79 3 weeks ago 8
@johnlnichols79 This game heavily relies on CPU and RAM so your 580's in SLI ain't doing all that much.
SLYDFX05 4 hours ago
great... now I want 20000 visibility.
d3boy2002 4 weeks ago 49
@d3boy2002
Take on Helicopters has 20,000
jblackrupert 3 weeks ago 17
Is this empty map in mission editor? Try it with a little war on the ground;] How about 20troops vs 40troops and maybe some t72s vs abrams? Mission at night? Empty map is nothing my friend.
hudsonHwk02 4 weeks ago
Well actually NASA called, they're asking where you got this computer and they want to buy it
Mac0Phisto 4 weeks ago
Flight simulator x ? o.O
TheNickynugroho 4 weeks ago
I Think this game need a Computer Desktop Wich has Highpowered Speed Processor and etc,
like i5 or i7 processor for gaming, With Asus EN8400GS 1GB DDR2 64BIT, and a New Fan.
maybe that will do it.. MAX SETTINGS
ancheta90 4 weeks ago
I dont get why is everyone showing graphics options in this kind of movies O_o
Porabany 1 month ago
@Porabany
So you know what settings were used to achive the shown result.
Maxuskrachus 4 weeks ago
@Maxuskrachus I know this from title but showing this in options is like two kids arguing and one of it says: "I bet you dont belive me! Ill proove you this" Its kinda sad.
Porabany 4 weeks ago
@Porabany
Well, setting your visual prefs in ArmA is kinda twitchy thing, one time you got it all right just get Aliasing like crazy, other time you get a smooth picture but 5fps, etc...
So some advise on the topic is always welcome.
Maxuskrachus 3 weeks ago
@Porabany S.Z.P.A.N. comprendes?
hudsonHwk02 4 weeks ago
can you play multiplayer with jet
plz answer
thanks
Labatsports 1 month ago
The way to get this game with no stutter is a RAM disk that can hold all the games files.
f16madlion 1 month ago
i have laptop 486SX with 20MB of RAM
can i play game on low-lower modes?
i can get more video rams if i put the chip on the board.
surrenderforce 1 month ago
*Insert Battlefield 3 Comparison Here*
Spyyko 1 month ago
why does it sound like as if it has propellers
gabrielhuanosto 1 month ago
@gabrielhuanosto The A-10 has turbines in the air intake
4eHussars 1 month ago
THIS IS EPIC GAME FUCK OFP2
WtfUpload 1 month ago
DCS A-10C warthog
deathman0111 1 month ago
Is there use of a sound mod here? Because that engine sounds SEXY!!!
tarkinfish 1 month ago
When I was a kid, I wanted to grow up and fly A10s forever. That's all.
jmfalcon1 1 month ago
so you can just drop anywhere and explore the area? the map is like 50 times bigger than any map even seen on a game... WOW
Arma 3 is coming out soon
514Productions 1 month ago
It's like Flight Simulator X with guns.
MrHaxman123 1 month ago
holy shit
BATTLEFIELDvett 1 month ago
R.I.P headphones users or speaker users
MyThePooP 1 month ago
with a recording program , it always takes away some frame rate's. but in real time without one you would imagine it has more framerates. Great video. what do you think about i5 2500k 3.3 ghz with a gtx560 ?
fastone32 1 month ago
hey that sorry saved you from shitt
raheelperviz 1 month ago
AMAZING framerate man.. i just ordered a new mobo and cpu like 3.6 ghz to play take on helicopters and arma 2. hope it works good. still running a gtx 260
jacey1977 1 month ago
this game is more CPU demanding than GPU demanding. a better processor will help you more than a good graphics card in this situation
TheMightyPandas 1 month ago
You could've shoot something.
just saying...
AngryYoudoodlerNo69 1 month ago
Welcome.... to jurassic park.....
MrImtocoolforyou 1 month ago
Hi yes NASA called they want there Computer Back
letsmustang 1 month ago 90
@letsmustang
Hahaha
dzialkanr1 1 month ago
@letsmustang their**
Sovietskikh 3 weeks ago
Now THIS is benchmarking your pc.
CrispyTurtl3 1 month ago
Bf3 looks better
booommmful 1 month ago
@booommmful Sure, but is their custom mission making? How about a map like in the video? There's only one map that big in BF3. This game was made in 2009 and I think it's better than BF3. And don't say I'm an Arma fanboy, because I've only played it for 20 minutes, and I have around 3 days total spent in BF3.
hellawag3 1 month ago
@hellawag3 I agree. If BF3 had ANY modding at all then it would completely dominate. But sadly, DICE feels the need to make the game as difficult to even slightly change as possible.
rahi78 1 month ago
@rahi78 And the mods that are out make punkbuster freak out and ban you. atleast most of them.
hellawag3 1 month ago
@hellawag3 Some new hacks were released and PunkBuster banned legit players.
DICE and EA are considering dropping PunkBuster for good.
bf2lover42 1 month ago
@bf2lover42 They better, it sucks.
hellawag3 1 month ago
@hellawag3 I hear you. In BF2 it was a pain in the ass.
bf2lover42 1 month ago
@booommmful I mean anywhere close to that big, not that big.
hellawag3 1 month ago
@booommmful BF3 doesn't have a bicycle vehicle so Arma 2 Wins by default!
PMMillard 1 month ago
*Cries*
deadsearolls 1 month ago
consoles can't handle this
MrBratkenSolov 1 month ago
shoot the town or something what the fuck....
11xForces 1 month ago
i think my 9800gt shit himself
TheRapacci 1 month ago
i got 2 GTX 460 v2's in SLI and run those settings :D i <3 Arma :3
KakashiHatake209 1 month ago
@KakashiHatake209 460s or 560s?
zekeWN 1 month ago
@zekeWN 460 v2's they are factory over clocked... but i MAY bump thim up a little more time to time voiding the warranty.. but hey the stay at 53 Celsius so its alright
KakashiHatake209 1 month ago
so huge areas *_*
bzwMomobzw7 1 month ago
got mine up and running at everything maxed out at 1920x1200 resolution. its not really graphically demanding its requires more cpu n only takes about 1gb memory in task manager so 2gb system with half decent gpu will work fine as long as your cpu is good.. its like the oposite of bf3 i got a hdd failing on me after so many years and it runs smooth to me on a gtx480 and a cheap amd 945cpu 2gb ram.. its a good game :D
mopasaurus 1 month ago
580 GTX?
S3hz 1 month ago
@S3hz hence the title
decxtar2 1 month ago
@decxtar2 fail, but i was right on it without see the title lol
S3hz 1 month ago
Nasa called they want to know where you got your computer.
lunkheroofnuts 1 month ago
@lunkheroofnuts very bad joke
ThePowerOfX3m 1 month ago 2
i dunno why everyone thinks arma 2 needs a beast of a video card i find the game benefits more from cpu power and as long as your video card is not a budget one or from an old series does fine.
i say this because my 4850 ran the game looking nice... upgraded to 6950 and frames are more or less the same (heavy cpu bottleneck) and this misconception that Arma 2 needs a super computer is silly... a 4850 with the cheapest quad AMD is not a super computer!
3dwardXP 1 month ago 9
@3dwardXP So, could my AMD Radeon HD 6320 run this?
FPDood 1 month ago
@FPDood
given that the HD 6320 is a laptop chip i wouldn't want to tell you yes, and i cannot provide you any benchmarks, also dont know your RAM amount of the CPU.
i don't recommend serious gaming on any laptop as usually they aren't the best for gaming and you get considerably less bang for the buck, paired with a solid cpu it might be able to handle it but definitely not with many effects on.
your best bet would be to download the free version of the game and see for yourself.
3dwardXP 1 month ago
@3dwardXP
i meant RAM amount or the CPU not of the cpu...
Minimum specs required:
- Windows XP/Vista
- Dual-core processor
- 512 MiByte RAM
- Graphics card with 256 MiB VRAM and Shader Model 3.0
your video is 512mb SM 5.0 and dx11 based, so it would appear that it could run the game but like i said i don't put much faith in laptops for gaming.
3dwardXP 1 month ago
@3dwardXP My RAM is the average 4GB and the processor is pretty bad. It's an AMD E-Series processor and it's only a measly 1.6 GHz.
FPDood 1 month ago
@FPDood
it would be quite the stretch, like i said try the free version out and see how it runs and if it runs ok you may want to pick up the full game + expansion, then you can run mods etc
no harm in trying the free version! i would think you would get pretty low performance but maybe on lower settings with low visibility (its not as bad as it sounds, rarely do you need to see super far in the game world) it would be over 24 fps and playable enough for casual gaming.
3dwardXP 1 month ago
@3dwardXP Alright I just finished downloading the game and I'm about to play :) I'm not much of a PC gamer and anything over 20 FPS is fine for me
FPDood 1 month ago
@FPDood
let me know how it goes, im curious what frame rate you'll actually get, hopefully its not unplayable, use fraps or something to check the frames.
3dwardXP 1 month ago
@FPDood Can you givme de link form were did you download it
dominikkralj 4 weeks ago
@dominikkralj I got the game on Steam. Download Steam at steampowered(dot)com
FPDood 4 weeks ago
@dominikkralj I got my latest version of the game off of STEAM
johnlnichols79 3 weeks ago
@dominikkralj
Don't buy Arma from Steam. Get it direct from Bohemia. Sprocketidea [dot] com
You just download and install, no waiting for Steam to release patchs days after everyone else got them.
jblackrupert 3 weeks ago
@3dwardXP Well, I reckon a GTX 580 with an Intel 2600k 3.4Ghz will do a fine job with the performance on Arma 2...
RyoMultiMedia 1 month ago
@3dwardXP I ran the game on very low settings, with a 800x600 screen resolution, and got an average 10-20 FPS. That's honestly not too shabby, considering this laptop cost $300
FPDood 1 month ago
@FPDood
UR DOIN IT WRONG ლ(ಠ益ಠლ
mayhem380 2 weeks ago
@mayhem380 Than I installed a program called "Game Booster" and I was able to play at medium settings with double the FPS :D
FPDood 2 weeks ago
@FPDood
UR KINDA DOIN IT RIGHT ლ(ಠ益ಠლ
MOAR GRAPHICS ლ(ಠ益ಠლ
mayhem380 2 weeks ago
That was just... wow.
majinken90 1 month ago
i got that plane in saints row 3
imsomeguy13 1 month ago
damn! you must have one of those 3500$ graphics cards
bwdwtw 1 month ago
@bwdwtw GTX 580 costs 400-500$
gmk120 1 month ago
@gmk120 wow 400-500$ oh thats like 400-500 hours of work, easy.
bwdwtw 1 month ago
@gmk120 you must shop at Rip-Offs because over here in canada i can buy one for 100-150...
roman7302o 1 month ago
@roman7302o a GTX 580¿?
gmk120 1 month ago
Needs moar anti-aliasing.
deheervanderwerf 1 month ago
so it is just a plane flying over country what so spe..... wait is that a video game?
ARMA 2 best game out there.
werlops 1 month ago
the a-10 looks and sounds the exact same in lockon gold
MJJProductions1724 1 month ago
i dont like a 10. I prefer a good typhoon or a sukhoi
TheVaynard13 1 month ago
@TheVaynard13 dude the A-10 is the best AG aircraft. those planes are shit compared to the A-10 at air to ground.
yoyoyoyoshua 1 month ago
@yoyoyoyoshua I said something about air to ground??? I just said that i like more others planes.........¬¬
TheVaynard13 1 month ago
i fuckin' love the sound of A10!!!
14SoulCube14 1 month ago
I run it near max with 2x6870s in crossfire but I need more VRAM to put textures and that at Very High, but I will prob still be playing this game by the time I get a new video card.
InAUGral 1 month ago
so this is more deamanding then bf3. i thougt so
davedavito 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos 73
@davedavito it is (though to be frank bf3 is optimized better than arma 2)
ghos7bear 1 month ago
@ghos7bear BF3 is also running a lot less behind the scenes. With ARMA it has to run all the sim aspect, and then run all the dynamic ai for the entire 200km map. Not to mention the graphical aspect.
killmachine234 1 month ago
@davedavito it is
14wasp 1 month ago
@davedavito
bf3 45 fps on ultra, 60+ fps on low.... arma 2 28-50 fps on highest settings, with 5k view distance (depending heavily on the mission and situation)
bf3 is very well optimized and more eye candy then anything else, arma 2 is a behemoth of a game with much scripting / AI / view distance. BF3 likes to have a very nice video card and can deal with a weaker cpu. Arma 2 likes a good video card but only to a certain point and benefits more from a very fast cpu.
3dwardXP 1 month ago
@3dwardXP yea i thought so
davedavito 1 month ago
@davedavito Of course it's more demanding than BF3, the map size and player count can easily be 10x that of BFs.
Darylw27 1 month ago
@davedavito bf3 is made to look good. Arma 2 goes beyond that sorry.
Tilyard123456 1 month ago
@davedavito considering the view distance is 10000, of course its going to be more demanding.
harvesthunter0707 1 month ago
@davedavito its also better
CKMLMA8 1 month ago
@davedavito This game is really deamanding on your CPU, BF3 is deamanding on your GPU, 2 very different things.
seroyer2 1 month ago
@seroyer2 yea i knew that allready. i warn´t sure but now i´m really sure.
davedavito 1 month ago
@davedavito Yeah, and one thing why it's more demanding, because the engine of Battlefield 3 (Frostbite) is much more better optimized than ArmA 2s one. I really hope that ArmA 3 is going to have better optimization in it's engine. Then I would play it. :D
Don't get me wrong though, ArmA 2 is an awesome game but I cannot play it on high settings without choppy FPS, and I don't accept anything under high-setting. Maybe I'm just a perfectionist. xD
FinnishGaming 1 month ago
@davedavito
Don't type the words "BF" or "Battlefield" below an ArmA vid dude...
Shit BF costs tons of cash and not even their latest release can keep up with Operation Flashpoint 1.
Maxuskrachus 1 month ago
@Maxuskrachus hey stupid do u think ur cool now? ever played bf2? u can bearely bealive it the same game sarie as bf3. idon´t like bf3 but it is really good grafics. i like games whit mods i played projekt realiyt really often but i don´t like how u get kicked before somebody warns you. BUY BF2 CHECK OUT BF2 MODS ATT MODDB AND U UNDERSTAND Y I LOVE BF
davedavito 1 month ago
@davedavito You need spell check. Badly.
RaverWhiteLight 1 month ago
@davedavito Damn, thats some fine grammar you got going on there kid. I hope to hell your not British... As, no English man should be that bad at his own language.
Gazjohnful 1 month ago
@Gazjohnful no i´m not english i´m from sweden and i was kind of angry. where does it stand that i am from great brittian (don´t give a shit how u spell britain
davedavito 1 month ago
@davedavito You spelt it right the second time... And I was only pointing out that your butchery of the English language made me hope you were not English that's all... with your first comment you put, you cant fault my reasoning... anyway, good day.
Gazjohnful 1 month ago
@davedavito
Nothing compares to ArmA, NOTHING, okay, APB is well underway but still cannot compete, it's good though, and BF sucks donkeyballs, modded or not.
My opinion, if you like BF2 thats your personal preference, it's a kiddogame though (my opinion again) where ArmA is "As close to war as you ever want to get".
Maxuskrachus 1 month ago
@Maxuskrachus that´s ur opinion but i don´t agre and u seam like a stupid dumb ass that got prejudices about games. by the way how old are u?
davedavito 1 month ago
@davedavito
No prejudice at all, i had BF2 on my PC, with all addons, BF is a game in which your only objective is to capture a flag and hold it until you get overrun by the enemy (totally unrealistic). In OFP and ArmA the amount of possible objectives: infinite, the amount of scenarios: infinite, user generated mods addons and missions: infinite (check ArmADB), the size of AO: to large to cover, realism: at every corner, the price: 1/4 of what EA wants for a game 5 years old now.
Maxuskrachus 1 month ago
@Maxuskrachus i the graphic makes me kind of sick played for free and i got sick and puked maybe of another reason i don´t know
davedavito 1 month ago
@Maxuskrachus corection i think. and by the way bf2 has mods u know?
davedavito 1 month ago
@davedavito
My age is displayed on my profile btw.
Maxuskrachus 1 month ago
FAP FAP FAP i've got this game and its old.....
BUT IT STILL BEATS MW3 and BF3 xD
jvdj4912 1 month ago
@jvdj4912 lol 2009 for you old, i still play Delta Force on occasions :D 1998, THAT IS OLD :D
MonsterRage 1 month ago
@jvdj4912 Crysis is from 2007 and still has one of the best graphics after BF3...
TheBuzzlin 1 month ago 3
@TheBuzzlin bf3 has better graphic than crysis are you joking go very far out of the map by walking trees and other stuff become 2D :)
BrutalGamez 1 month ago
@BrutalGamez I said Crysis from 2007 has the best graphics AFTER!!! BF3 -.-
TheBuzzlin 1 month ago
@BrutalGamez But Crysis with graphical mods beats the living daylight out of BF3 when it comes to vegetation and landscape. Truly. BF3 looks so nice cause it has over-exposure and a ton of contrast.
Killery96 1 month ago
FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP. i want this game
Jakeoc2 1 month ago
@Jakeoc2 FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP i need 700 € to upgrade my rig :(
Gamer03121993 1 month ago
Damn, watching that beautiful baby with all those missiles unused is like watching a woman with a big ass bending over towards you and saying, "not today honey."
edwin11373 2 months ago
dont take me the wrong way but seriosly!
sputnikrobert 2 months ago
what is the point in the video
sputnikrobert 2 months ago
@sputnikrobert His point is that he can maxed out Arma 2 without his pc exploding. Arma 2 is a very demanding game specially this map which is about 220 km. Very massive.
edwin11373 2 months ago
Warthogs!!! HELL YEA
gmxgamer 2 months ago
FIRE THE CANON !
xambone 2 months ago
The reason why Arma 2 takes alot isn't so much becuase of the graphics it's the CPU. It has to process alot of information on what your doing, the AI are doing, etc etc it's really not like Crysis in this aspect.
Tilyard123456 2 months ago
@VideoRoom207 My old GT 240 could play ArmA 2 decently, it cant max the graphics out, but it can run it at Medium graphics which still looks nice on ArmA 2. And plus its only $50 ;)
ChiefSuckEmHard 2 months ago
Shit That A10 is fucking heavly armed
UknownSoldierS259 2 months ago
I tried to play it on the lowest settings but my computer still couldn't handle it =/ . It looked terrible as well. Original OFP looks better at Arma 2's lowest settings. Hope to be able to play it decently one day.
VideoRoom207 2 months ago
well, there is only one thing left to say... DO A BARREL ROLE!!!
krontor98 2 months ago
ok so i have the same settings you do.. no lag.. and a gtx 460.. how come my arma looks like total shit and yours doesnt??? even with out the 10000 visibility?
178thbattlegroup 2 months ago
@178thbattlegroup If you have the F2P version you won't be able to do this, but most likely he has graphics enhancement mods.
Jakerson76 2 months ago
@Jakerson76 i have f2p =/
178thbattlegroup 2 months ago
@Jakerson76 there is no graphic enhancement for arma
TheZero4life 2 months ago