Added: 1 year ago
From: GunOwnersofAmerica
Views: 2,848
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I live in PRNY, I gave my wife my SKS with the 20rd tapco jungle taped-mags so she has the best chance of staying alive when predatorS come, yes more than one. Hey Carolyn, I oppose the law of man. I CANNOT serve two masters. I will love GOD and despise the state. So do us here in PRNY a favor if/when you read this carolyn: understand in life you can't always get what you want. If you choose to attack my family, I hope you bring hell with you, because you will need it. Deuteronomy 20:1

  • "can somebody answer this question! does anybody think all this gun control stuff is a false flag just to take away guns from citizen to make it easier for when this country is invaded by NATO troops"- Good, looking forward to that, light blue helments are easy to see through a scope!

  • This hi-cap mag ban measure has as much chance of passing the Republican controlled house as jihadists handing out bibles at a mosque. Surely McCarthy can find more important issues facing the state of NY. Voters in NY take note and remember how your tax dollars were spent on futile pursuits next election. Sorry Mrs. McCarthy, I have 12 20 rd., and 6 30 rd. AR-15 mags and I WON'T BE TURNING THEM IN!

  • can somebody answer this question! does anybody think all this gun control stuff is a false flag just to take away guns from citizen to make it easier for when this country is invaded by NATO troops, Americans wont be able to protect them selves. kind of what they are doing in Libya? I'm a dummy, can yall answer that question for me?

  • 2:36 "Shoulder thing that goes up"

    2:53 Hickok45 with a 1911

  • ....i remember the early nineties well....the shooting on the LIE train that took the Honorable Representative McCarthy's Husbands Life WAS A DIRECT RESULT of the Gun-Control restrictions enacted in NY State & ESPECIALLY NYC....now her Vendetta only serves the same evil to prevent good people from being able to protect themselves and other good people. Shame on her....may G~D have mercy on her misdeeds & the anguish her endeavors will & have caused.

  • Lautenberg is an Israeli dual citizen, Google it and while your at it Google U.S.S Liberty.

  • Every time I see McCarthy's shriveled up ugly face I go buy some more ammo just cause I know it will piss her off. Now I'm gonna go buy some more magazines. A LOT MORE!!

  • This has nothing to do with this video, but it's imporant to me, so I'm posting a comment about it here.

    If you live in the state of Louisiana, please bombard Congressman STEVE SCALISE with emails & phone calls expressing your feelings on the fact that he VOTED FOR AN EXTENTION OF THE PATRIOT ACT THIS WEEK.

    If you live somewhere else you can visit this site and see how your reps voted

    and hold them accountable for this injustice! pass this on!

    clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/roll0­26.xml

  • It would be nice... if Rep. McCarthy and Sen. Lautenberg would put those pee-brains to work and come up with a plan to secure the border. Thank you, for posting.

  • Sigmund Freud: "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."

    =

    V4Victory ` TLC

  • high capacity clips are great for target shooting...

  • Lautenbullshit yt channel has all comments and rating disabled. What's wrong Frank, can't handle real comments from real gun-owners. Wish this asshole would just retire. GOD I hope he doesn't get reelected.

  • Who needs a large (regular) capacity magazine??

    ALL OF US

    When we get swat-teamed for refusing to surrender our rights.

    LIVE FREE OR DIE. MOLON LABE

  • The right to bear arms doesn't mean you get to have whatever kind of gun you want. Right to bear arms should be a crossbow, if you're lucky. I wonder if you guys think the guns would help you in a revolution. Like if you think there could be another civil war. The government wouldn't even need to fight people on a field, they have too much tech that they can just break us down with. In a revolution, guns would only be used to kill each other, not the oppressors. All the dominoes falling in place

  • @fleckx yea, because there isn't any infantry deployed in Iraq, dumb fuck.

  • @IsaacKarjala What does that have to do with it, idiot? War is a different thing. The police and military here have DIRECTED-ENERGY WEAPONS for crowd control. Basically, all the guns in the world won't mean shit.

  • @fleckx uhm..... the Ancient Romans and Greeks both had the technological know how to defeat so called "directed energy weapons"...... it's called a mirror..... and even then, those super high tech weapons you're referring to still have human operators who are still very much vulnerable to bullets...... and yea, the right to bear arms does mean that you can have whatever type of firearm you want, that's what the words "shall not be infringed" mean.......

  • @IsaacKarjala MIRRORS? DA FOKK? Oh yeah and LRADS and Microwave guns are attached to TANKS.

  • @fleckx ... yea, Al and Cr mirrors both reflect mircrowaves...... Ag mirrors I am not so sure about, but most mirrors aren't Ag.... and you are talking about weapons that are largely still in development and even then it's likely that modern US tank armor won't stand up against modern Russian and Iranian shoulder fired artillery (Israeli tanks are more heavily armored than US ones and Hezoballa picked them apart with Iranian weapons.... Iraqis are using antique Russian weapons.... )

  • @fleckx It is far more than that, It is about the ability to protect yourself against criminals.

  • @fleckx In a true civil war, parts of the military would turn against the government just like they did long ago. If gun confiscation went into effect there would be civil war. Also, a .50cal sniper rifle can hit targets 1.5mi. away, therefore destroying directed energy weapons before they even fire. While I'm at it, our tanks have the best armor in the world, you clearly haven't a clue, or are a troll. I know all of this because I was an infantry TOW gunner (anti-tank) in the Marines.

  • @ReaverVex That's a cute fantasy. Marines aren't privy to the parts of the US Military that have high end weapons that are far more advanced than anything the public will see for years. 200 million red necks with guns will mean nothing to this oppressive regime we've had in power for several decades now.

  • @fleckx I'll take my knowledge of the subject over yours. The things you've said proves how ignorant you are of our equipment and attitudes. The Marine Corps will not disarm the public, we talked about this very subject. If the Marine Corps turns against the government, they will have problems. If you think I'm a stupid redneck, I'm in college for mechanical engineering and plan on designing weapons with my knowledge. BTW The Abrams tank is the toughest in the world.

  • @ReaverVex I never said stupid. But yeah if you think there would be some kinda civil war where the people would fight the government that's funny. Still a cute fantasy. The directed energy weapons they've already done the testing with will make everybody scurry on home, and that's just tier 1.

  • @fleckx So may I ask, what are Your plans? Just sit and let them fry you with their ray guns? The Marines are not Privy to these systems. Oh yea, Only the Super Secret Armed Forces or perhaps the U.N. And if what you say is entirely true, WHY do they want to take away our little pop can shooting guns so bad. Yes, why would they even want our little 22s, or 45s for that matter. Did you hear how the Swiss just voted Down Gun Control! Let's see, what is their violent crime rate again. Oh yea, Zip.

  • @hotheadedjoelhaha The Swiss are also socialists who collect massive taxes from everyone but provide all sorts of subsidies and cushy aid programs. That is the reason they have less crime, people aren't left poor and desolate and they don't feel the crushing boot of cold capitalism on their neck.

  • the problem is well-meaning libtards are under the idiotic assumption that gun control = crime control when all the studies show the exact opposite is true. Gun control = crime endorsement!

  • wow that is not cool

  • McCarthy should get a job she's more suited for like an Old Retired House Maid Cunt and let Lautenberg drive her ass around town every day and stop stealing our MONEY!....

  • Don't tell the weaponphobes about belt-fed guns!

    If those morons can ban magazines then someone should buy a truckload of those magazines and hand them out for free. It would be a great photo opportunity.

  • Why do people need large capacity magazines? For the same reason cops do.

    "The only powers the government has are the powers we give it. And the only powers we give it are the powers WE have to give it." - Judge Napolitano

  • "Shall not be infringed," what does it take for them to understand this!?

  • What a joke. This crap will never pass. It wouldn't accomplish anything if it did either. It takes less than 3 seconds to change a mag and put one in the chamber. lol Stupid liberals...so clueless.

  • "Who needs a high capacity magazine?" Any family who's home is under attack by SWAT teams attempting to evict them for unpaid back property taxes, that's who!

  • BOTH extremes (total gun legalization and total gun bans) are bad. Legality but with sensible regulation only makes sense, does it not? And I'm not so sure it's conclusively proven that "all gun control doesn't work." The effects of good gun control are surely a lot more subtle than that. And besides, it's not like it's proven that concealed carry lowers gun crime all that much. The states with the highest rates of gun ownership also tend ot have higher crime rates :/

  • @whoo689 Not true at all - The higher rate of gun ownership the lower the GUN crime rate. And as stated in the video no gun control laws have EVER lowered crime rates.

  • Why is it unreasonable to ban high-capacity magazines?? Is it THAT necessary to have a gun with 30 bullets instead of, say, 10? Isn't 10 more than enough? It takes only one bullet, fired properly at the target, to stop an attacker, for instance.

    I'm all for gun rights, but you guys really go all out on the fringes with this crap. Focus on battles that are WORTH it, not bullshitting us with, "Oh, we need to oppose this reasonable measure because if they get their way they'll ban guns next."

  • The idea that every single American, or at least one that qualifies, NEEDS unrestricted access to ANY firearm imaginable is just kooky. Let's keep it in the confines of reality.

  • @whoo689 "Shall not be infringed" Americans have the right defend themselves against a tyrannical government.  Also, "The states with the highest rates of gun ownership also tend to have higher crime rates" = BS.

  • @whoo689 It's no coincidence that the US is considered the most free country on the planet and also the most well armed.

  • @whoo689

    High capacity mags are designed for suppressive fire in a military application. Since the Second Amendment was written to ensure civilians would have access to arms equal to that carried by the common infantryman then we not only need high cap mags but we need to repeal GCA '68, to end de facto gun registration, and repeal the NFA, to make military weapon affordable to the common man again.

    Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first.

  • Frank Lautenberg can Go F#*K himself.

    Get it thru your fat stupid head, we are NEVER giving up our guns. And never means never.

    Just like " being necesary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" means SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED !

    Read the Founding Documents, Senator. Remember the ones you swore to uphold?

    Barry Goldwater

  • I've got magazines that will be "illegal" if these idiots get what they want. I want to see the brave SOB that will come take them from me. I hope for his sake he doesn't have a family.

  • The US government has shot and bombed over one million Iraq’s! Including children!!! Tell them you will put your weapon down when they drop there’s… fucking hypocrites!

  • "weapons of mass destruction" is a buzz phrase commonly used in the UN when dicussing their small arms treaties. They (IANSA etc) see civilians as the cause of crime and firearms related deaths, not governments and armies.

    Making high cap mags illegal will simply mess over law abiding citizens. It takes 2 seconds to switch them back to high cap and as much as id like to im no criminal, so im stuck with 5/30 round mags.

    30/30 round mags are for gov and psychopaths only it seems.

  • Come and fucking take it.

  • @JaysThoughts

    You better be preparing to go take theirs instead of sitting at home waiting to get picked off one by one as they hope you will.

    It will take more than a few election cycles to fix this mess if can be fixed. It's time to stop hunkering down for he apocalypse and start thinking Normandy.

    Don't understand? Follow my links. Read the quotes page first.

  • and who gets the A+ rating from GunOwnersofAmerica... the one and only president Ron Paul. Legalize the constitution simple as that.

  • Fuck these politicians,the way I see it they are the enemy.

  • Did not the father of that poor child say"Do NOT let our daughter's death be used to take away more freedoms"?Saved for later distribution,thanks.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more