Sweden is stupid if Sweden asked the U.S to "borrow" a b-2 stealth bomber to learn how to detect it and defend against it America would laugh but Sweden gives them this sub real smart ...
@cksteele The US hasn't borrowed anything, they leased a submarine and the crew. This is nothing strange at all, it was basically just a very long military exercise and training with other nations is very useful. And it's not like our Gotland class submarines are brand new and top secret or anything, we'll have a newer class of submarines operational in a few years from now.
We are Allies with USA but we are not in NATO and Sweden is an Neutral nation. And we are only 10 million in population..-.- so then WHY give USA our security away like this..??
The USS Kitty Hawk battle group did some war games with the Aussies and got its ass handed to it. Australia's old Collins-class boats were able to approach, attack, "sink" the carrier with dummy torpedoes AND get away. It proves that a smart submarine skipper can make up for lack of the latest technology and still get one over on the Yanks.
Very recently, a Chinese submarine deliberately surfaced at close range inside a U.S. carrier battle group just to let them know not to fuck with China.
@Bullen934 Dom ska byta ut Södermanland klassen, De har beställt tror det var 4 nya ubåtar av kockums. och ska sälja södermanlandsklassen till tror det var singapore. Det är sant. Gotland har fortfarande några år kvar.
Sweden is the only country that could sneak up any other nation's coast - and totally annihilate it.
We don't need the NATO (Sweden is not a member) to be the most successful nation on Earth, just like Volvo, H&M and IKEA don't need Tony Soprano to make it big time in New Jersey.
Ofc thay wanna know how to destroy them, tho if we wanted, there whouldnt be a power block with a navy in the world we whould make quick work of them in 6 months xD safest way to accualy protect there ship is to dry dock them 24/7-
gotland class submarines use stirling engine AIP, not fuel cell AIP. thats a big difference. it produces more heat and, whats even worse for stealth, has a lot of moveable parts. no doubt the gotland is a quiet an efficient warmachine, but the german fuel cell technology IS state of the art.
FAN VAD JAG HATAR NÄR ÄCKLIGA AMERIKANARE KOMMENTERAR ATT SVERIGE ALDRIG HAR GJORT NÅGOT I VÄRLDS KRIGEN. NÄ VI GJORDE INTE LIKA MYCKET MEN DET KAN BERO PÅ ATT VI ÄR 9/10MILJONER MÄNNISKOR VI ÄR ETT LITET LAND MEN FAN VET INTE OM DET ÄNDÅ ÄR DET BÄSTA. VI UTNYTTJAR INTE ANDRA VÄRLDS KRIGET FÖR ATT KÄRNA FUCKING PENGAR DET HÄR ÄR EN ANLEDNING TILL VARFÖR JAG HATAR USA DERAS LIV GÅR UT PÅ ATT KÄRNA PENGAR!!!
@1Nsky ja sverige var neutrala men vi hade ändå svenska soldater i kriget och om folk säger att vi var neutrala enda anledningen till att vi klarade oss så bra var för att vi hjälpte tyskarna
@95system Anledningen till att Hitler inte anföll Sverige var att om han skulle göra det så var han rädd att Britterna skulle bomba våra malmgruvor i norr. Sverige som stat var "neutrala". Vi tog inte parti för någons sida, även om Tyskarna fick åka lite tåg igenom Sverige osv. Men dom som sted för någon part var enskilda soldater som var frivilliga.
Nja, Gotland vettitusan. Men det fanns planer att invadera Sverige ifrån Norge. Nu blev det aldrig aktuellt, men viss planering inför en eventuell invasion var framtagna.
Finnarna stred aldrig emot Tyskarna, Finland stred mot Sovjet och blev på så vis "allierade" med Tyskland.
@GlobalGamingSociety Därför att våra politiker är knähundar som skakar av fasa var gång USA höjer tonläget, vi har ju dessutom en försvarsminister som inte gjort lumpen (vapenfri tjänst) så man ska nog inte förvänta sig några skarpa taktiska förmågor där.
And it all started when the Gotland snuck up against a U.S. aircraft carrier, took a picture and took off again. When the Navy saw the picture they said "WFT" !
@gamer5274 This submarine was studied by the US navy for a year in a loan program, it;s detectable now. The worlds quietest sub is the Astute class now anyway.
@zfxcvgbhnjmk Pretty much yes becuse of the end of the war we did get our hands on a XXI class sub by the german navy ^^ whit that we did create some nice prototypes :D
@zfxcvgbhnjmk Pretty much yes because of the end of the war we did get our hands on a XXI class sub by the German navy ^^ whit that we did create some nice prototypes :D
I dont worry about Russia. Its America thats verry triggerhappy. They smile one day and say "freedom". The next day theyre bombing your family looking for oil.
Där har ni en äkta svensk viking pojkar och flickor. inget nuclear eller not weird som japanerna kanske kommer bygga ihop med toyota delar. En ubåt för alla uppdrag :D älskar den här videon tack fö UL
Vi har som bekant inte bara dom mest avancerade ubåtarna i världen. Det gäller även stridsvagnar, infanteri, utrustning o.d samt motvärn. Men det har ju ryktats om att USA utvecklar en ny prototyp av stridsvagn som bräcker våran Leopard 122. Men den kommer inte långt med tanke på den avancerade teknologi och kunskap vi Svenskar besitter idag inom Fysik, Förnybar energi, Plasmat, Ultralätta & unikt starka material och mycket mer. En mångfald av erfarenhet vi är ensamma om i världen idag.
@gamer5274 The point Is that other nations can build these types of subs, aggresive nations. Its better to share this technology whit our "allies" so two USS air craft carriers dont end up at the bottom of the ocean.
@Frajdsson yeah a sub that is practicly invisible and can shot missiles at u while u can't see it or do shit about it... yep i would have been scared as fuck....
Sweden is the most technologichally advanced nation on Earth. Today, Stockholm beats Silicon Valley (and this is in many ways due to the prescence of American companies).
The Swedish population size is small, but I still claim Sweden, without difficulty, could produce over 500 extremely advanced tanks on a DAILY basis. A nation like Russia could not.
@scholion Yep, and who would drive those tanks? Even our military service is becoming optional now, I don't think we have the crew to operate even 400 tanks.
@OlderG0ds that JAS is nice is pure bullshit. Their start was horrible. the project was a disaster. They crashed several times, and never seemed to get it working. Their main concern was getting a CHEAP aircraft. so NO, it's not nice.
@henraisse Only 6 have crashed and that is not a high number, and they have not resulted in any casualties or serious damages. And it is in fact quite natural that such accidents happen, Eurofighters have crashed, Rafales have crashed, MiG's and Sukhoi's have crashed, American F-16's and F-18's crash, even their new advanced and really expensive F-22 Raptor has crashed several times. The fact is that the JAS 39 Gripen is a very good and a very safe aircraft.
@henraisse To develope a unique aircraft sutch as the Gripen takes losses. You could easily continue with old techniques and traditional productions, but then it would have been an old aircraft even though it just left the line. To breake new barriers and spearpoint techniques has never been easy, nor free of incidents, it´s a price that has to be payed in order to stay at the top.
@henraisse Well then youre a total idiot. The J39 Gripen crashed twice during development. And if you do your homework youd find that its much less than most fighterplanes, even the J37 Viggen.
The only reason the J39 caught so much attention was because it crashed during an airshow.
@Lillie1986 JESUS CAN YOU PEOPLE JUST LEAVE ME ALONE I DONT CARE ABOUT HOW MUCH YOU'VE BEEN DOING YOUR COLLEGE RESEARCH ABOUT THIS DARN MACHINES, JUST STOP FREAKING HARRASS ME, IS THAT SO FUCKING HARD TO GRASP???????
@henraisse 5 months ago actualy. Your reply 5 months ago was to a post that was posted a 1 year ago. That makes it a 7 month time difference, where as mine was only a 5 month time difference. So right back at you.
It´s a fine balance between US and Sweden in military strategy. US got good stuff in quantity, and Sweden got exellent stuff but in very limited quantity.
The Swedish Gotland-class shows, that biggest, most armed and biggest group, wouldn´t always be the most powerful.
Gotland is also a diesel electric sub suited for coastal defense, the advantage is they are much quieter but lack things that our nuclear subs do, such as ability to stay out to sea and underwater indefinitely, and operate in deep ocean which is what they're meant to do.
But yes of course Gotland can find a carrier it shouldn't be very hard
@kulmedfarbrorful It has an air independent propulsion (AIP) , I believe as an auxiliary source of power. Which allows it to stay underwater longer so yeah but it's still primary power is diesel-electric engines
Somehow, any and I mean any video relating to military whatsoever will inevitably end with idiots arguing over WW2 and who was most powerful and yada yada yada.
During the coldwar Sweden had lots of spare parts and repair equipment for american planes such as F-14 tomcat etc. hidden on our military airfields. So US fighters could land, get fuel, repairs etc and then take of for operations in Russia. So yes Sweden has always been true allies to the west.
lol not allies with the west? because of "the pirate bay site" that even our own media corporations are battling against in court. You must be one of those conspiracy loonies here on youtube. Wake up ! :D
Haha ok. I didn't know they made vhs's anymore of something so recent, put it up so you can ram them 'dowm' my throat. As for the other comments...um...off topic a little? I want to know about your original comment.
yeah.. good to see that your big egos over there can be blown to pieces.. now: FIX YOUR FUCKING ECONOMY SO THE REST OF THE WORLD CAN EAT... just lost my job here.. and i know that i dont know all the facts in the crisis, but youre budget is stretched to the limits because "you guys THINK theres nuclear missiles in Iraq" and that shit.. stop being so damn naive and stop being a fucking world police and let the rest of the world be alone.. capitalist-assholes
Iraq is an expensive success story, freedom prevailed and instead of a antii-western tyrant we now have one of the richests democratic allies in the mid-east. Not a bad deal.
Withouth capitalism the world would be a dark pit.
Swedish military dont spend the budget on the number of soliders, instead swedish military spend it on technology, now Sweden have the worlds most best military to the number of soliders.
Swedish submarines, jetfighters, tanks. Is all in top 10 best.
Is a guy with an anti tank missile a tank? No, and neither is a vehicle, tracked or otherwise. And no, the 40mm L/70 wont kill a tank, it'll barely dent it.
I think all that sex you had with goats and camels in Pakistan has warped what was left of your brain...tell us again how the RN sunk the Japanese fleet in the Indian Ocean in 1942..tellus again
No, he really said that, and how the UK "saved the US West coast" from japan..you know his usual crap..he was some other vid..if i find it I'll send it to you
The last non-nuclear carrier just retired you fucking idiot. And yes, they visit ports around the world, but in time of war they sure as hell don't have to. U R so retarded it's unbelievable.
And, how the Gotland took out the carrier hasn't been released. Show me proof. Your theory that it was under the carrier is idiotic.
Problem with a sub launching cruise missiles is that it gives away its position. And carriers have many defensive weapons to defeat them. Get a brain retard.
Actually, Britain still has three of the Invincible class carriers in commission and they are working on the Queen Elizabeth class. Both are diesel powered.
Also, I agree with you on the Kilo, but all of it doesn't apply to the Gotland or the German type 212. AIP technology eliminates quite a few of the factors.
Also, so far, all their countermeasures are based on active sweeps.
They are. The AIP system is virtually vibration free.And just to point fingers at the rest of the world, they're already working on a successor to the Gotland, the A26
I just read that S. Korea is buying 6 more 212's. W/ their Aegis ships and these subs they are develping a damn good navy.
Thanks again for your info and not being so arrogant about it like so many other posters here. It's nice to see some civilized people have a discussion rather than the in-your-face junk. Take care.
Sorry, but carriers don't need to go to shore. If they wanted to they could stay at sea for years. They don't need refueled and supplies are brought to them at sea on a regular basis.
The US did figure a way to defeat the Goland, thanks to the Swedes for letting us lease their ship. Only problem is the environmentalists that don't want the USN to use the sonor due to fear of harming wildlife. Supreme Court backed the Navy first time around.
There's an entire ring of defences. It's not easy.
:)
vinterv 3 days ago
Sweden is stupid if Sweden asked the U.S to "borrow" a b-2 stealth bomber to learn how to detect it and defend against it America would laugh but Sweden gives them this sub real smart ...
cksteele 1 week ago
@cksteele The US hasn't borrowed anything, they leased a submarine and the crew. This is nothing strange at all, it was basically just a very long military exercise and training with other nations is very useful. And it's not like our Gotland class submarines are brand new and top secret or anything, we'll have a newer class of submarines operational in a few years from now.
jimmyn89SWE 1 week ago
sverige hjälper en kompis så att denne inte ska bli sparkad i pungen:)
wtfffs1 2 weeks ago
We are Allies with USA but we are not in NATO and Sweden is an Neutral nation. And we are only 10 million in population..-.- so then WHY give USA our security away like this..??
xRemRooodx 1 month ago
Btw why does USA want to know how to destroy our submarine? hm? let me think perhaps to get back the advantage on water?
DarkTemptation51 1 month ago
Why the fuck should we tell USA how to beat our technology?
carolus84 1 month ago 7
varför vill dom lära sig ätt spränga vår ubåt för? nåt i kikarn? hehe
SwedishLeo 1 month ago
and how to kill them...wtf
MrShinywill 2 months ago
US whant to know how to detekt and how to sink it!! Stupid americans.
pellenyberg 2 months ago
proud to be swedish! , Sverige!
fssapparti 2 months ago
nice submarine :)
012332154 2 months ago
@012332154
Malmgruvorna var minerade, hade tyskarna närmat sig hade vi själva sprängt dom..
stofesexpandylenxx 2 months ago
@stofesexpandylenxx Haha nej det var dom inte. Dom var ju tyskägda nästan alla och malmen gick till tyskland. Tro mig jag vet.
bazookatim 1 month ago
The USS Kitty Hawk battle group did some war games with the Aussies and got its ass handed to it. Australia's old Collins-class boats were able to approach, attack, "sink" the carrier with dummy torpedoes AND get away. It proves that a smart submarine skipper can make up for lack of the latest technology and still get one over on the Yanks.
Very recently, a Chinese submarine deliberately surfaced at close range inside a U.S. carrier battle group just to let them know not to fuck with China.
InfiniteMushroom 3 months ago 2
This is and old submarine now, Sweden have new one coming up in 2018, so beware..
ceasar112233 3 months ago 23
@ceasar112233 Source? And it's not old Gotland was built 1995. Our other uboats Södermanland is built 1987-1990 and is still in use today
Bullen934 3 months ago
@Bullen934 Dom ska byta ut Södermanland klassen, De har beställt tror det var 4 nya ubåtar av kockums. och ska sälja södermanlandsklassen till tror det var singapore. Det är sant. Gotland har fortfarande några år kvar.
187nydala 2 months ago
@Bullen934 i think the newer sub is called A26. not certain but its going to be better and one of the most advanced in the world.
JORDHOLMEN 2 weeks ago
@JORDHOLMEN Yeah I saw a video when they talked about te new submarine. It will be awesome!
Bullen934 2 weeks ago
When Sweden is mentioned in a american tv-studio, it just makes me proud.
(weird?!)
Swedguy211 3 months ago 6
Sweden is the only country that could sneak up any other nation's coast - and totally annihilate it.
We don't need the NATO (Sweden is not a member) to be the most successful nation on Earth, just like Volvo, H&M and IKEA don't need Tony Soprano to make it big time in New Jersey.
scholion 3 months ago
Ofc thay wanna know how to destroy them, tho if we wanted, there whouldnt be a power block with a navy in the world we whould make quick work of them in 6 months xD safest way to accualy protect there ship is to dry dock them 24/7-
Geredan89 4 months ago
So sweden gone just bend over and give this system to US Navy ???
thats od
evomasterryan 5 months ago
@federyko00 The Neitherlands as well, they have also build classes of AIP subs, and Spain the same.
kuluku 5 months ago
@Bullen934 Gotland is built by the same german owned company that also builds the U 212 class.
FrancisJoa 5 months ago
Det är toppen att man tar mina skattepengar till en tyst ubåt!!
Sedan visar man Usa hur den funkar.
Nu är den värdelös, vad ska vi med ett försvar till då?
honda750750 6 months ago
I must say this: the Swedish naval jack looks great on a ship, especially a submarine. Oh yes, and I am Swedish. :)
MowgliX 6 months ago
@Bullen934 Är det inte Gotland klass?
PixelOfDeath 7 months ago
@PixelOfDeath Gotland Klassen och Båten heter Gotland Förutom denna så finns även HMS Uppland och HMS Halland i klassen.
Bullen934 7 months ago
@Bullen934 Ok, jag är inte så bra på båtar
PixelOfDeath 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
gotland class submarines use stirling engine AIP, not fuel cell AIP. thats a big difference. it produces more heat and, whats even worse for stealth, has a lot of moveable parts. no doubt the gotland is a quiet an efficient warmachine, but the german fuel cell technology IS state of the art.
CalderaXII 8 months ago
sverige ge fan i USA dom har fan hur jävla mkt pengar som helst dom kan
95system 8 months ago
där fick ni U.S.A in you'r face
1bizang 8 months ago 2
@gamer5274 vi säljer massor med vapen till staterna så dem vill inte gå mot oss
ThereIsNothingToFear 8 months ago 2
@federyko00
True but the HMS Gotland class was the first. ;)
Ander01SE 9 months ago
@Bullen934 where did you read, that we´ve told them "how" ?
wedajm 9 months ago
was that the us president (yeah i know hes black irl) in the end and he was like... "FU*K!" ? x)
SergeantJK 9 months ago
Ha ha Sweden rules!!!
ombud74 10 months ago 36
great country!
Ticonio 8 months ago
@ombud74 hahaha any former soviet state kick sweden's ass.
so2murad 3 months ago
They will never kill us, RUN!
jjonis5555 11 months ago
Haha, gf USA.
Sverige för vinningen!
TheCandlejacker 11 months ago
FAN VAD JAG HATAR NÄR ÄCKLIGA AMERIKANARE KOMMENTERAR ATT SVERIGE ALDRIG HAR GJORT NÅGOT I VÄRLDS KRIGEN. NÄ VI GJORDE INTE LIKA MYCKET MEN DET KAN BERO PÅ ATT VI ÄR 9/10MILJONER MÄNNISKOR VI ÄR ETT LITET LAND MEN FAN VET INTE OM DET ÄNDÅ ÄR DET BÄSTA. VI UTNYTTJAR INTE ANDRA VÄRLDS KRIGET FÖR ATT KÄRNA FUCKING PENGAR DET HÄR ÄR EN ANLEDNING TILL VARFÖR JAG HATAR USA DERAS LIV GÅR UT PÅ ATT KÄRNA PENGAR!!!
95system 1 year ago 2
@95system jävla kapitalister
MrPwnedyourmom 1 year ago
@95system Amerikaner är självgoda svin i många lägen, ja, men vad får dig att bry dig? för mycket hormoner? och lär dig stava :p
henraisse 11 months ago
@henraisse tack för att du ska klaga på min deslexi
95system 11 months ago
@95system Pga att Sverige var neutrala hela 2VK så blev Sverige ett utav dom rikaste länderna i världen efter -45. Så undra vilka som tjänade pengar.
1Nsky 3 months ago
@1Nsky ja sverige var neutrala men vi hade ändå svenska soldater i kriget och om folk säger att vi var neutrala enda anledningen till att vi klarade oss så bra var för att vi hjälpte tyskarna
95system 3 months ago
@95system Anledningen till att Hitler inte anföll Sverige var att om han skulle göra det så var han rädd att Britterna skulle bomba våra malmgruvor i norr. Sverige som stat var "neutrala". Vi tog inte parti för någons sida, även om Tyskarna fick åka lite tåg igenom Sverige osv. Men dom som sted för någon part var enskilda soldater som var frivilliga.
1Nsky 2 months ago
@1Nsky 90 % av den svenska officerskåren var Tysk vänlig. Men de visste väl inte bättre vid krigets början?
Melchersson 2 months ago
Comment removed
TheEmsann 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1Nsky
Det är sant.
Men Hitler tänkte bomba eller attackera Gotland.
Många svenskar tyckte inte alls om det sverige gjorde.
Många svenskar gick över till Norge och Finland och stred med finnarna och norrmännen mot tyskarna eller rättare sagt nazisterna.
Det var tusentals svenskar som dog av nazisterna när svenskarna stred mot tyskarna.
Tusentals svenskar är mycket för att vara ett neutralt land.
Jag kan nog säga att väldigt många svenskar var i mott nazismen!
TheEmsann 1 month ago
@TheEmsann
Nja, Gotland vettitusan. Men det fanns planer att invadera Sverige ifrån Norge. Nu blev det aldrig aktuellt, men viss planering inför en eventuell invasion var framtagna.
Finnarna stred aldrig emot Tyskarna, Finland stred mot Sovjet och blev på så vis "allierade" med Tyskland.
1Nsky 1 month ago
@1Nsky Finnarna stred visst mot tyskarna. Efter att de slutit fred med Sovjet 1944 drev de ut de tyska trupper som fanns kvar i Finland.
blubbson 3 weeks ago
@blubbson Så efter att tyskarna ofrade resurser och soldater för finland backstabade finnarna dem... trevliga typer! =.=
Osiwaw 3 weeks ago
@Osiwaw Dock var ett av villkoren för vapenstilleståndet att Finnarna skulle avväpna eller köra ut Tyskarna.
jimmyn89SWE 2 weeks ago
I think its very clear Submersible vessels > Surface vessels
gearbox011 1 year ago
u realize sweden did fight in WW2?
zfxcvgbhnjmk 1 year ago
@zfxcvgbhnjmk where?
arveduilastking 1 year ago
Undrar hur mycket usa var villiga att betala för att avslöja hemligheten med våran ubåt.
Alexanderstuve 1 year ago
I thought the Germans had a new super quiet submarine.
iluvdx60 1 year ago
@Bullen934 ryssland vågar inte göra ngt pga bodens fästning. inte en chans
TheSwekebab 1 year ago
Varför avslöjar vi vår teknologi för USA??
GlobalGamingSociety 1 year ago
@GlobalGamingSociety Därför att våra politiker är knähundar som skakar av fasa var gång USA höjer tonläget, vi har ju dessutom en försvarsminister som inte gjort lumpen (vapenfri tjänst) så man ska nog inte förvänta sig några skarpa taktiska förmågor där.
Beast4Hire 1 year ago
@Beast4Hire Ja det är ju helt åt helvetet.
pellenyberg 2 months ago
sell it to Iran and watch the U.S navy take a shit
ericssson 1 year ago
And it all started when the Gotland snuck up against a U.S. aircraft carrier, took a picture and took off again. When the Navy saw the picture they said "WFT" !
siemenstraffic 1 year ago 2
I wonder why the US navy did not borrow a German sub... mouuuhahahhaha... Gotland is excellent!
SgtDrDeath 1 year ago 2
@gamer5274 This submarine was studied by the US navy for a year in a loan program, it;s detectable now. The worlds quietest sub is the Astute class now anyway.
mrgeorgeallison 1 year ago
How do you know these are detectable now?
iluvdx60 1 year ago
@iluvdx60 they do indeed. And the techonology in Gotland and the german sub are very similar neither is detectable by current standards btw.
zfxcvgbhnjmk 1 year ago
@zfxcvgbhnjmk Pretty much yes becuse of the end of the war we did get our hands on a XXI class sub by the german navy ^^ whit that we did create some nice prototypes :D
theunknownunit 1 year ago
@zfxcvgbhnjmk Pretty much yes because of the end of the war we did get our hands on a XXI class sub by the German navy ^^ whit that we did create some nice prototypes :D
theunknownunit 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iluvdx60 they do indeed. And the technology in Gotland and the german sub are very similar neither is detectable by current standards btw.
zfxcvgbhnjmk 1 year ago
Dem vill veta hur man upptäcker och slår ut denna ubåt -.-'
Ska svenskar komma till USA och säga det över en kopp kaffe? =S
Linus286 1 year ago
@Linus286 Nej. DOM eller DE inte DEM
Repsej 1 year ago
vi ska väl inte visa hur vi har byggt våra militära grejor det ska vi hålla hemligt tycker jag
rikthallen 1 year ago
hahah, min polare sitter i den båten :p
yallo2345 1 year ago
I dont worry about Russia. Its America thats verry triggerhappy. They smile one day and say "freedom". The next day theyre bombing your family looking for oil.
folkfrontensmarsch 1 year ago 3
Ha HAA yanks beware! the swedish are coming to GET YOU !
Darusdei 1 year ago
Där har ni en äkta svensk viking pojkar och flickor. inget nuclear eller not weird som japanerna kanske kommer bygga ihop med toyota delar. En ubåt för alla uppdrag :D älskar den här videon tack fö UL
SuperAnime4life 1 year ago 2
Vi har som bekant inte bara dom mest avancerade ubåtarna i världen. Det gäller även stridsvagnar, infanteri, utrustning o.d samt motvärn. Men det har ju ryktats om att USA utvecklar en ny prototyp av stridsvagn som bräcker våran Leopard 122. Men den kommer inte långt med tanke på den avancerade teknologi och kunskap vi Svenskar besitter idag inom Fysik, Förnybar energi, Plasmat, Ultralätta & unikt starka material och mycket mer. En mångfald av erfarenhet vi är ensamma om i världen idag.
SweCommander 1 year ago 3
@gamer5274 The point Is that other nations can build these types of subs, aggresive nations. Its better to share this technology whit our "allies" so two USS air craft carriers dont end up at the bottom of the ocean.
tyskbulle 1 year ago
Att avskaffa värnplikten var en dålig idé.
Andrekky 1 year ago 17
we are few but good!
daniel931016 1 year ago
hahah are they scared of a SUBMARINE? dude americans ARE paranoied XD sry by the english ey, im a swed u know ;)
Frajdsson 1 year ago
@Frajdsson yeah a sub that is practicly invisible and can shot missiles at u while u can't see it or do shit about it... yep i would have been scared as fuck....
thatdude034 1 year ago
@thatdude034 what, do you really think that this submarine just gonna attack the US just like that? hmm no!
Frajdsson 1 year ago
@Bullen934 japp det kan jag hålla med om dem fule jäv**rna
gamer5274 1 year ago 2
@gamer5274 haha
Bullen934 1 year ago
Don't mess with the Swedes!
Piercetp 1 year ago
im from gotland :)
aggbala 1 year ago
Swedish warfare FTW we have the best subs, tanks and fighter-aircrafts in the world.
yezz933 1 year ago
@yezz933 yes....but way to few to be of any importance :(
Skalmans750 1 year ago
Sweden is the most technologichally advanced nation on Earth. Today, Stockholm beats Silicon Valley (and this is in many ways due to the prescence of American companies).
The Swedish population size is small, but I still claim Sweden, without difficulty, could produce over 500 extremely advanced tanks on a DAILY basis. A nation like Russia could not.
scholion 1 year ago
@scholion Yep, and who would drive those tanks? Even our military service is becoming optional now, I don't think we have the crew to operate even 400 tanks.
ladulaser 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Had Sweden fought anywhere during WW2 it would have been in Finland against the Soviet Red Army."
- Perhaps that is so.
But We aren't Finland and you aren't exactly Einstein.
scholion 1 year ago
Goo Sweden!! (lol i'm from Sweden)
roahir 1 year ago
@LOSVOLA2 Did it have a Swedish crew?
SNUGGIPWNSLOL 1 year ago
The world should be happy that we swedes are such nice people :)
stony911 1 year ago 4
kick ass boat haha ;D
MisterFigge 1 year ago
Jas 39 Gripen is the biggest world wide nation selling aircraft during the 21th century.
Visby Corvette Class boats are undetectable on radar until 9 miles away.
Sweden is underestimated.
anttonoo 1 year ago 3
@anttonoo
?? Jas Gripen is a nice jet but only South Africa has bought 26 of them, Hungary has lease-and-buy 14 of them.
F-16 easily outsells any other plane sorry.
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds He said during the 21:Th century, and we have sold more of those than you list.
Red0100 1 year ago
@Red0100
It's wrong no matter what. Jas Gripen is not some best selling jet, sorry. Hardly anyone has bought them.
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds Can you read? Yet again, he said of the 21:Th century.
Red0100 1 year ago
@Red0100
I know he said 21st century. It's still fucking wrong.
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds that JAS is nice is pure bullshit. Their start was horrible. the project was a disaster. They crashed several times, and never seemed to get it working. Their main concern was getting a CHEAP aircraft. so NO, it's not nice.
henraisse 11 months ago
@henraisse You describe the development and testing phase, do you say it's a flying disaster right now too?
OlderG0ds 11 months ago
@henraisse Only 6 have crashed and that is not a high number, and they have not resulted in any casualties or serious damages. And it is in fact quite natural that such accidents happen, Eurofighters have crashed, Rafales have crashed, MiG's and Sukhoi's have crashed, American F-16's and F-18's crash, even their new advanced and really expensive F-22 Raptor has crashed several times. The fact is that the JAS 39 Gripen is a very good and a very safe aircraft.
jimmyn89SWE 11 months ago 2
@henraisse To develope a unique aircraft sutch as the Gripen takes losses. You could easily continue with old techniques and traditional productions, but then it would have been an old aircraft even though it just left the line. To breake new barriers and spearpoint techniques has never been easy, nor free of incidents, it´s a price that has to be payed in order to stay at the top.
Skalmans750 7 months ago
@henraisse Well then youre a total idiot. The J39 Gripen crashed twice during development. And if you do your homework youd find that its much less than most fighterplanes, even the J37 Viggen.
The only reason the J39 caught so much attention was because it crashed during an airshow.
Lillie1986 6 months ago
@Lillie1986 JESUS CAN YOU PEOPLE JUST LEAVE ME ALONE I DONT CARE ABOUT HOW MUCH YOU'VE BEEN DOING YOUR COLLEGE RESEARCH ABOUT THIS DARN MACHINES, JUST STOP FREAKING HARRASS ME, IS THAT SO FUCKING HARD TO GRASP???????
henraisse 6 months ago
@henraisse Well you should stop posting shit on youtube then. Do your research first.
Lillie1986 6 months ago
@Lillie1986 THANK YOU, IVE REALIZED THAT A YEAR AGO WHEN I WROTE IT. USE A TIME MACHINE OR BE UP TO DATE WITH YOUR REPLIES IDIOT
henraisse 6 months ago
@henraisse 5 months ago actualy. Your reply 5 months ago was to a post that was posted a 1 year ago. That makes it a 7 month time difference, where as mine was only a 5 month time difference. So right back at you.
Lillie1986 6 months ago
It´s a fine balance between US and Sweden in military strategy. US got good stuff in quantity, and Sweden got exellent stuff but in very limited quantity.
The Swedish Gotland-class shows, that biggest, most armed and biggest group, wouldn´t always be the most powerful.
Odqvist89 2 years ago 7
Gotland is also a diesel electric sub suited for coastal defense, the advantage is they are much quieter but lack things that our nuclear subs do, such as ability to stay out to sea and underwater indefinitely, and operate in deep ocean which is what they're meant to do.
But yes of course Gotland can find a carrier it shouldn't be very hard
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
I Thought it runs on compressed gasses, like oxygen and maybe N..... I know for fact it has compressed oxygen in tanks....
kulmedfarbrorful 1 year ago
@kulmedfarbrorful It has an air independent propulsion (AIP) , I believe as an auxiliary source of power. Which allows it to stay underwater longer so yeah but it's still primary power is diesel-electric engines
OlderG0ds 1 year ago
@OlderG0ds
I can just say that two months is max, maybe three or SIX months if you want soldieers thats fatigued.... Sweden win. Stop sell guns! :(
kulmedfarbrorful 1 year ago
a nice submarine but some really weird commentary here...
granskare 2 years ago 4
Somehow, any and I mean any video relating to military whatsoever will inevitably end with idiots arguing over WW2 and who was most powerful and yada yada yada.
OlderG0ds 2 years ago
these guys have nothing to do...:)
granskare 2 years ago
The vikings had the best ships.. today we still got the best ships.. im proud :)
333plus333 2 years ago
During the coldwar Sweden had lots of spare parts and repair equipment for american planes such as F-14 tomcat etc. hidden on our military airfields. So US fighters could land, get fuel, repairs etc and then take of for operations in Russia. So yes Sweden has always been true allies to the west.
Sweden80Here 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
FilipH86 2 years ago
lol not allies with the west? because of "the pirate bay site" that even our own media corporations are battling against in court. You must be one of those conspiracy loonies here on youtube. Wake up ! :D
Sweden80Here 2 years ago
vi har inte stor militär längre men nig fan e den vi har bra! ^_^
MasterOfFlash92 2 years ago
Well i you yanks promise to open a KFC in stockholm then will tell ya !
Sweden80Here 2 years ago
you couldn't even beat the IRA ass hole
ericssson 2 years ago
truefagbrit2008 your a douchebag and you don't know shit
the Gotland is second to none with the U212
ericssson 2 years ago
OMG, tänk om Piratpartiet skulle kapa den och gömma den i The Pirate Bay, det skulle vara ett hot mot upphovsrättslagen :O
Jag måste berätta för Pirate Ponten....
jajabom1234 2 years ago
Haha ok. I didn't know they made vhs's anymore of something so recent, put it up so you can ram them 'dowm' my throat. As for the other comments...um...off topic a little? I want to know about your original comment.
agore308 2 years ago
I'm calling bullshit. The US never uses even close to 12 subs in wargames. Where is your source?
agore308 2 years ago
"the threat is real" american fear mongering, there like Stalin everything is out to destroy you
FilipH86 2 years ago
hehe... :) touché, my friend.
ExON00 2 years ago
woohoo, sweden will rule the world!!!
MRmajorna95 2 years ago
Heil Sweden, long live scandinavia.
Best regards, Limukone.
Keep your flag high!
Limukone 2 years ago 26
Sweden own ;)
zrbubah 2 years ago 4
impressive!
hope the Royal Norwegian Navy will buy some of those.
Our submarines aren't bad either. during exercise Joint Winter, KNM Utvær sunk so many ships that it was banned for 72hours.
The exercise halted because no landing craft could get to shore.
BTW, why are they leasing away their sub, helping the development of a countermeasure? ?
Guess they have forgotten what war is all about? (they haven't been to war for 200yrs)
ExON00 2 years ago 4
Iam werry sure if Norway wants to buy some subs of this class from us, we would be happy to sell or build new ones to export them to norway
but I dont think we would sell them to USA, i just cant see it happed
Arodon3x0 2 years ago 2
yeah.. good to see that your big egos over there can be blown to pieces.. now: FIX YOUR FUCKING ECONOMY SO THE REST OF THE WORLD CAN EAT... just lost my job here.. and i know that i dont know all the facts in the crisis, but youre budget is stretched to the limits because "you guys THINK theres nuclear missiles in Iraq" and that shit.. stop being so damn naive and stop being a fucking world police and let the rest of the world be alone.. capitalist-assholes
paronsoda2000 2 years ago 8
Iraq is an expensive success story, freedom prevailed and instead of a antii-western tyrant we now have one of the richests democratic allies in the mid-east. Not a bad deal.
Withouth capitalism the world would be a dark pit.
richter75 2 years ago
haha this was so awesome! USA being owned by little Sweden ? haha just awesome!
rugbyanden 2 years ago 7
this is like 3-4 years old news :P
we have been over ther working with USA for some yeras now and shiping new soldiers to practise with them every year..
xx3z 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
ThaSweKillah 2 years ago
that is trrue !
fearmyaim112 2 years ago
we own the americka you see swedish for life brother sverige fosterland )
bondfredda 2 years ago
sweden rules!
OMD4ever 2 years ago 2
The best submarine in the world today.
arnmagnusson22 2 years ago
Swedish military dont spend the budget on the number of soliders, instead swedish military spend it on technology, now Sweden have the worlds most best military to the number of soliders.
Swedish submarines, jetfighters, tanks. Is all in top 10 best.
beginmaster 3 years ago
Correct, very good, you win a cookie!
truffyt 3 years ago
Wait, what Swedish tank? They use the German Leopard II now. The CV90 is an IFV not a tank.
chrthiel 2 years ago
The CV90 is a Swedish/Norwegian tank.
TheZenMachine 2 years ago
Again, the CV90 isn't a tank, its an Infantry Fighting Vehicle.
chrthiel 2 years ago 3
Its a fighting vehicle that can kill an tank, I call that a tank.
TheZenMachine 2 years ago
Is a guy with an anti tank missile a tank? No, and neither is a vehicle, tracked or otherwise. And no, the 40mm L/70 wont kill a tank, it'll barely dent it.
chrthiel 2 years ago 3
"Its a fighting vehicle that can kill an tank, I call that a tank."
Kill a tank? Since when does a tank has life? Did I miss that biology class?
rugbyanden 2 years ago
If u have been in the army you know wht i mean. That's how you say it:Kill, exterminate or w/e you prefer.
Tbh....why do you even post stupid comments like this? If u have a brain you understand and if u are retared you post comments liek this.
GL with your life.
TheZenMachine 2 years ago 3
and the Leopard II is german yes, but its been updated by the Swedes.
TheZenMachine 2 years ago
To A4 standard.
chrthiel 2 years ago
Sweden took the Leo2A5 and made it better.
The Leo2 in Sweden is called Strv122 or Leo2A5S.
The A5S became the base for all following Leo2 models.
Scurck 2 years ago 2
I think all that sex you had with goats and camels in Pakistan has warped what was left of your brain...tell us again how the RN sunk the Japanese fleet in the Indian Ocean in 1942..tellus again
hitide286 3 years ago
Please tell me you're joking. Did ms. coward really ay that? LOL It wouldn't surprise me.
I also wouldn't be surprised if we see her claim that GB invented water, air, land, etc. Ms. coward is such a bitch.
asusucks 3 years ago
No, he really said that, and how the UK "saved the US West coast" from japan..you know his usual crap..he was some other vid..if i find it I'll send it to you
hitide286 3 years ago
I kind of figured. I wonder how he feels on being known as one of the biggest liars on YT. I'll take a look at the vid. Thanks.
asusucks 3 years ago
The last non-nuclear carrier just retired you fucking idiot. And yes, they visit ports around the world, but in time of war they sure as hell don't have to. U R so retarded it's unbelievable.
And, how the Gotland took out the carrier hasn't been released. Show me proof. Your theory that it was under the carrier is idiotic.
Problem with a sub launching cruise missiles is that it gives away its position. And carriers have many defensive weapons to defeat them. Get a brain retard.
asusucks 3 years ago
Actually, Britain still has three of the Invincible class carriers in commission and they are working on the Queen Elizabeth class. Both are diesel powered.
Also, I agree with you on the Kilo, but all of it doesn't apply to the Gotland or the German type 212. AIP technology eliminates quite a few of the factors.
Also, so far, all their countermeasures are based on active sweeps.
chrthiel 3 years ago
Thanks for the info. From what I've read is that the Gotland and 212 are much more difficult to track than the Kilo.
asusucks 3 years ago 5
They are. The AIP system is virtually vibration free.And just to point fingers at the rest of the world, they're already working on a successor to the Gotland, the A26
chrthiel 3 years ago
I just read that S. Korea is buying 6 more 212's. W/ their Aegis ships and these subs they are develping a damn good navy.
Thanks again for your info and not being so arrogant about it like so many other posters here. It's nice to see some civilized people have a discussion rather than the in-your-face junk. Take care.
asusucks 3 years ago 2
Correction, 6 more Class 214's for South Korea. Go here to see more
defencetalk. com/news/publish/navy/Six_More_Submarines_of_Class_214_for_Korea120016871. php
asusucks 3 years ago
Yup, South Korea has to make due with the economy model.
chrthiel 3 years ago
I couldn't agree more
Karlaker 2 years ago
Sorry, but carriers don't need to go to shore. If they wanted to they could stay at sea for years. They don't need refueled and supplies are brought to them at sea on a regular basis.
The US did figure a way to defeat the Goland, thanks to the Swedes for letting us lease their ship. Only problem is the environmentalists that don't want the USN to use the sonor due to fear of harming wildlife. Supreme Court backed the Navy first time around.
There's an entire ring of defences. It's not easy.
asusucks 3 years ago