Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,150)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The only reason Dont Ask Dont Tell is "disrupting unit morale" is because there are so many intolerant assholes in the service as it is.

  • RON PAUL 2012!!!

  • sarah palin 2003!

  • ugh. I'm a republican and it's people like this who make us all look bad. I really hope Romney doesn't choose her as his running mate.

  • @GARDNERVALLENTINE I am glad to see that moderate republicans still exist. I am a liberal, but I think that a nation needs two healthy, strong parties with different views.

  • Pompous bitch is pompous.

  • @mynaimizmatt13 "If someone wants to be it, let them." lol. No.

  • 63 people are in unhappy marriages

  • The majority of them are bible thumping bigots. Cain, Romney, Perry, and Bachmann fore sure. I didn't know Huntsman's policies. I'm not convinced that Ron Paul is as idiotic as the rest. Santorum is simply racist and homophobic.

  • @Keusfrench You are a Christian, so do you beleive that as per the bible you should not eat shellfish? Ps I am gay.

  • @bazinga1964 No I don't believe that... what verse is that, if you don't mind?

  • Old people.... they can't get anything right...... = )

  • I hate this woman's guts.

  • Bachmann is a close minded woman. End of story

  • wtf? Doesn't the bible also say that divorce is against marriage as well? This woman is a hypocrite.

  • So sad that the most bigoted,backward looking people get so far in politics.

    Hopefully none of these clowns will progress any further.

    And for a guy who the media likes to say is "out there" Ron Paul again is the only candidate with a respectable,common sense answer.

  • Bachman is full of shit!

  • Unbelievable. A disgrace.

  • She should adopt at risk gay kids as her foster children. She can then start touting everywhere she goes that she has 1000s of foster children.

  • I'm confused how she would even know that having a mother and a father is the bets way to raise a child, since she was raised by a "single mother".

  • @Hairsprayxoxoful Because studies have shown that having both a father and mother is far more beneficial to a child then having 2 mothers or 2 fathers, or 1 father only/1 mother only.

  • @KeusFrench I call RETARD on your statement..O_O..Where and when has thier been studies done on this subject concerning the developement of children from adolescence to adulthood. Thier havn't been any studies done that have a base of long term results like the ones needed to have a conclusive outcome like the ignorant claim you are making. Wow..There is a lot of uneducated people out there..O_o"

  • @disposablefreedom Are you kidding me? Studies have shown that having a mother and father to raise and teach their children is far better than having 'other' combinations of parents. Want to know why?

    Because a father teaches specific qualities that a mother cannot, and vice versa. A single mother cannot substitute for a father, and neither can a father substitute for a mother. This is why homosexual parenting is not as effective/beneficial for children.

  • @KeusFrench, the problem with your contentions is that they are simply not true. The studies do NOT show that gay parents are not effective or beneficial to children. In fact, just the opposite. The problem with so many conservative/religious/anti-ga­y types is that when the facts don't support their agenda, they just make stuff up and lie through their teeth. Those who check out the facts know better, however.

  • @GodCreatesGays2 The problem with YOUR view is that you're clearly biased.

    As well, studies definitely do NOT show that gay parents are more effective/beneficial. I am taking courses in this, and if your claim is true then I guess educations wrong?

    I think the problem with your view is that you're clearly angry at my sense of logic and cannot create a sensible rebuttal and therefore choose to employ false tactics.

    Then you win, sir.

  • @KeusFrench I know Gay parents....I can say without question...They are cared for just as much if not more by thier loving parents.

  • @GodCreatesGays2 Thank you.The issue I have..The studies are "NOW" being conducted.So far they are in favor of the alternative.So far the children are productive.Also children and people in general are what they are either they are gay or straight..It is not an enviromental thing as most ignorant people want to believe.Just as the twins in a documentary I watched.One boy was feminine and one was masculine and no difference in upbringing was involved.One was inherently Gay the other straight.

  • @disposablefreedom Well I can tell you that there have been NO studies for your side. That is purely made up biased propaganda to strengthen your argument.

    And yeah I know people are gay or straight, and they choose to be what they want - I never once argued that being gay is wrong or that I hate homosexuals. They're people, I understand.

    And my argument was NOT that gay parents couldn't love their child. I would never dispute a parent's love for their child.

  • @KeusFrench Hey that's what I been sayinO_O.NO STUDIES have been done.How is the Fact that no studies have been done Propaganda"? Or better yet "your words" "Made up"Also You say "They choose to be what they want"When did you choose to be straight?There is no choice in the matter.You are either Gay or Straight O_o"Why can't people get that through thier heads.Gosh!!Also you are the 1 that said thier were studies..I call you out on it and you flip flop. Biased? huh?made up?hmm?

  • @disposablefreedom No I still know there were studies for my side...

    And yeah being gay is a choice.

  • @KeusFrench

    And how exactly do u know that being gay is a choice? R u gay? Were u gay and chose NOT to be? R u str8 by choice? Could u wake up one day and choose to be gay? Why is it that people like u can NOT get something that is so simple? Being gay is like being str8, u can't choose or change what u r.

  • @primexevolution Okay, then how do you explain the fact that homosexuality was not even nearly as 'popular' as it is today?

    Did people in the 21st all of the sudden just grow up to be homosexual when in previous centuries that was just not the case?

  • @KeusFrench Again, u know that homosexuality was not popular in previous centuries cause there was a study that said that back then? Actually, homosexuality is steady since the day they started mesuring it in societies...It is just that now it is more APPARENT than it was even 10 years ago...

  • @KeusFrench Studies for your side? Makes no sense..What are the studies on "your side" even used for if thier is no basis to compare them too?Like I said.."Makes NO sense. :/ Question:Are you Gay? If not then where do you get your knowledge on the subject? How are you gonna sit there and say it's a choice when you have no idea what you are talking about?If you say you do know what you are talking about then you would have to be Gay..??

  • @disposablefreedom It makes sense because teachers and prof's have told me that and I think that their information is reliable... wouldn't you agree?

    Answer: No I am not gay. And I get my knowledge from reading the news, magazines, opinions, etc. I am also a Christian and I have a set of morals that I follow. I think homosexuality is wrong.

    And just because I know a ton about something doesn't mean I am that 'thing'. Hitchens knows religion well, but he is not religious.

  • @KeusFrench Deal with matters that u do understand and leave matters u r NOT able to understand to others.

    PS The problem I have with people like u is NOT the fact that u say homosexuality is wrong etc BUT that u -like most religious people- want to enforce their morals on other people who r different. I DON'T CARE IF U THINK THAT GAYS R IMMORAL,BUT I GET OUTRAGED WHEN U TRY TO ENFORCE YR WAY OF THINKIΝG ONTO OTHERS.

    BE WHAT U WANT AND LET OTHERS BE WHAT THEY WANT! MIND YR BUSINESS

  • @primexevolution Okay now you're pissing me off.

    First. I understand this matter well enough. Probably more than you do.

    Second. I NEVER EVER tried to force my religion or beliefs on you. You are completely WRONG in saying that.

    Third. I never said that gay's were immoral through their actions, but rather that, technically, 'being' gay is immoral. Just living it.

    Fourth. I think you should mind YOUR own business. You commented on MY comment.

    Frickin retarded ignoramus.

  • @KeusFrench

    4. When u state an opinion like these u write in here about homosexuals u make it my business to argue with u, cause I AM A HOMOSEXUAL, what's yr excuse?

    Who is the ignorant now?

  • @KeusFrench

    1. To understand the matter of homosexuality u have to be either gay or do a research on the matter. U r NEITHER gay NOR have done any research, OBVIOUSLY.

    2. When u pass judgement on someone and u say that homosexuality is immoral, then YES u r forcing yr beliefs on others.Just say u do not agree and we will not have any problem.

    3.Who told u that yr "christian" or whatever morals r irrefutable or what u think about homosexuality is undoubtebly true

  • @primexevolution I have done research and read up about it as I've already mentioned.

    And I am not judging anyone nor pressing any sort of religious belief on them. I'm just saying that in my opinion it is wrong, just like you'd say that in your opinion, it's right.

    Yet I never once claimed that you were pushing your beliefs on me. Weird...

    As for your "#3", the wording made no sense, so please rephrase it.

    And NO, you're wrong again. I never asked for a debate. YOU commented.

  • @KeusFrench

    Yeah right, u have done a research on homosexuality yet u claim it is wrong...Hm I wonder how u come up with such a conclusion,when every respected scientist,the APA and many others state just the opposite...? As for #3 I was simply trying to tell u that what u think about what is moral and what is not, isn't absolute and it is not irrefutable. And if u don't believe me then search:"O tempora, o mores"(latin) or "Ω καιροί, ω ήθη" (greek).U commented, I just answered

  • @primexevolution ...just what exactly are you saying!? That if I research something, I must agree with it? I can tell you right now that not even close to "every" respected scientist thinks homosexuality is right. That's an extremely deluded claim.

    And no, I never said that my moral standards were to be taken absolutely or universally. How and why would I say that when each person has different morals?

    Wow...you seem to like twisting my words around quite often it seems.

  • @KeusFrench

    Ok then, do not agree with what all medical associations and doctors say about homosexuality, have yr own opinion on the matter...after all what do they know,right? FYI EVERY RESPECTED SCIENTIST AND DOCTOR actually agree that there is nothing wrong with homosexuality...and again I am backing up my statement with facts, unlike u, so search what the American Physocoligal Association and other similar associations have to say about homosexuality and u'll see who is deluded

  • @primexevolution Umm they know tons about medical sciences. And besides, you CAN'T make the assumption that doctors don't know anything about homosexuality. And you also CAN'T make the assumption that every single one AGREES with it.

    If they know nothing then their agreement on the matter means absolutely nothing!

    And seriously? I'm not wasting my time going on a random goose chase to seek facts against my argument. I already know there are two sides to everything.

  • @KeusFrench

    Maybe u need to educate yrself more... Only religious people believe that homosexuality is wrong! Find me one serious doctor or scientist that says homosexuality is wrong and I will "choose" to be str8. Until then, bye bye

  • @primexevolution Actually I've seen some people who claim to be atheists, attack gays as well. Though as far as I know, none of them are doctors or scientists.

  • @BoredomCorner

    Well u know, even stupid people claim that they read Milan Koundera, that doesn't mean that they understand him...

  • @KeusFrench Teachers and professors have told you that Gays were not prevalent in ancient society?That is just pure stupidity..What about ancient Greece and Rome?It was actually viewed no different than heterosexual activity.Also your knowledge is based on news,magazines and opinions?You entirely missed the point of not being able to understand something you can never understand,you being heterosexual.As far as religion,that's your business not mine.Imorality is a point of view nothing more. :/

  • @disposablefreedom Nope never said that! Though I will say it now; history teachers have. And yeah prevalent as in majority or a large number. You cannot openly tell me that there were LOTS of gay's back then. As in 30-40% of the population.

    And no I cannot understand homosexuality 100% as I am not gay. But even though they might know more, that does not discredit the fact that I DO have some knowledge on the topic.

    As for the whole 'thing' subject, you misunderstood me.

  • @KeusFrench You are very misinformed if you have been told that 30-40% of the population is Gay. O_O. As far as thier being lots"Define lots" And don't make up a percentage this time :/ As I stated b4 "Ancient Greece&Rome. Look it up.As far as a misunderstanding with your statement "THING".. I'm not as dumb as you think. I know what Thing captured in this manner means.."THING" ..I wasn't born yesterday.So you r stating a retraction? "Knowledge doesn't necessarily mean wisdom"

  • @disposablefreedom Do you never read my comment before replying? I said that there is NO WAY that gays made up 30-40% of the population. How about you read my comment slowly and carefully before accusing me of that?

    As for the thing, I said THIS: "And just because I know a ton about something doesn't mean I am that 'thing'." ... this simply means that, for example, if I know a ton about Hinduism, that I'm NOT necessarily Hindu.

    I was never calling gays 'things', ever.

  • @KeusFrench Oh come on..You stated in the context that there is 30-40% now..You are no different that Bauchman and all the rest of these simple minded people out there.You get caught up in some random made up percentage or propaganda and then you flip-flop and make a rebuttal...People like you never change.You think you know what you are talking about when it truth you are completely blind. Funny you used the actual word Hindu in your description of Hinduism...Hmmm? :/

  • @disposablefreedom No I didn't! I said this: "You cannot openly tell me that there were LOTS of gay's back then. As in 30-40% of the population". That means that I did NOT think there were 30-40%. This also negates the rest of your comment as it was presupposed from my "belief" in 30-40% ... LOL.

    And what is so funny about using Hindu in my description? If you believe in Hinduism, then you are Hindu. If you believe in Atheism, you are Atheist. What's your point?

  • @KeusFrench You know what..I really don't care. People are people and if someone wants to be with the person they love..Then I say love and let love.It's not my business or your business who some one wants too be with. Tell you what when you change your sexual desire then you have the right to protest that it is possible. Until then.. Ovua!

  • @disposablefreedom Okay I see that when you realize you made no sense from the beginning, you say you don't care anymore. Typical strategy of someone who is losing.

    Anyways, I didn't really care to debate in the first place, but I have just been replying to your comments.

    I don't hate gay people, and I never said that. I actually love everyone, and I am accepting of the fact that there are gay people.

    Just because I disagree with homosexuality does not mean I dislike gays.

  • @KeusFrench I'm telling you that I don't care....It's not about losing or winning..I'm just done with this subject..After a while circles get aggravating... O_O

  • @disposablefreedom Yes I agree. And what I was saying before was just that if you did not want to get into a debate, then you shouldn't have commented, or simply stated that you preferred not to argue. I would have complied.

  • @KeusFrench I commented because it matters too me..I did want to debate the issue but not with someone that can't view the subject from different perspectives..Arguing isn''t the issue..I love a good argument sometimes. I just don't like having to research made up figures or statistics that have no meret. Understanding the issue from a Gay persons point of view isn't an ability that a Heterosexual can lay claim too. That is my main point when debating this issue. :/

  • @KeusFrench It's kinda like me saying I know what a butterfly feels like.Or I understand what it feels like to be discriminated against because a person is black..That is something I can never understand."Ever"Further more for me to attack an individuals rights because they are who they are and me not knowing what it's like to be who they are,is unethical and bias.I have no right to do so because I have no "true" experience to make that paticular judgement."Nothing to base my decision on" "?"

  • @KeusFrench Well you clearly have some problem with them, especially if you want to block or rescind some of their rights.

  • @KeusFrench Also I noticed you emphasized "THING" as a description of a specific type of person. I rest my case on morality right there. Maybe you should take an ethics class and learn how to have a logical and "Ethical" conversation with a person. You are the one that brought up teachers and professors, maybe you should learn how to engage in an educated discussion before having one..Especially one you have no intigrated knowledge about..

  • Comment removed

  • @GodCreatesGays2 Also..They were twin boys..One was Gay and the other straight.. :/

  • @KeusFrench Thier have been NO long term studies to base your so called logic on..Need I say more!!!????

  • This is fucking sick.

  • Bunch of muppets.

  • I'm just glad she dropped out.

  • Incredible answers! Simply embarrassing.

  • go ron!!

  • And here some people may have thought that it was only Santorum who had santorum--look it up on Google--come out of his mouth every time he opened it.

    If you want to see some parents and children who show just how stupid all this bigotry against gays and their children is, look at the YouTube video:

    "Tinseltown's Proud Gay Parents" by Alist

  • Military Punishment sounds kind of fun...

  • It is going to be so hilarious when, not if, her husband is caught with a gay hooker.

  • @1:22 presidency of the "UNINEN STATES" Haha

  • i'm so sick of the gay hate. it's getting really old. I'm ashamed to call myself an american when such a large portion of our voting population is a bunch of old school bigots and haters. So much hate and religion slung into politics. What a mess.

  • I think her own kids would of been at risk! risk of becoming narrow minded homophobic,foolish,absurd,idio­ts!

    Not gay couples!

  • Consistency on marriage? The government isnt based on marriage, pretty sure government is way more important than the choice of who you get to marry.

  • The kids are at risk? At risk for what? Becoming overall kinder, more accepting people? Appreciating people for who they are? When you are raised by gay parents, you learn from the beginning important life lessons that no kid from a fundamentalist Christian home ever will.

  • The Bible supports homosexual marriage!! Look it up people, They can argue these couples did not have sex but they were same sex lifelong partners who had covenants before God, and God APPROVED. Ruth and Neomi and David and Jonathan. The two real love stories in the bible and they were same sex, they also use part of gay covenant of one of them to wed hetero couples nowa days, hypocrites. If only people actually read the bible they would know how wrong these republicans an religious are.

  • Get those children out of her home!

  • So being gay is "bad behavoir"? This is just one example of why we can't let the Republicans win in November!

  • PURE HOMOPHOBIA WRAPPED IN A BLANKET CALLED THE BIBLE AND RELIGION, THE BIBLE WAS CREATED TO SEGREGATE PEOPLE AND CREATE HATRED IN THE WORLD AROUND US, THE BIBLE IS THE SATANIC DOING OF THE 20TH CENTURY!

  • ever see that episode of south park where they shove food up their ass and crap out their mouth?

    yeah. that's what i think of every time this fundamentalist retard opens her pie hole.

  • Let people do what they want in their life. fuck man. i wouldn't be gay but if someone wants to be it, let them.

  • @mynaimizmatt13| Wants to be gay? What a strange wording.

  • @mynaimizmatt13 um nobody decides to be gay just randomly. that's impossible. why would someone choose a life of discrimination, that's just stupid on their part. homosexuality isn't a choice.

  • "until conflict is over" ? when is that ever likely to be ?!!

  • She wouldn't be permitted to foster any children in Europe with her beliefs.

  • She needs to get back to shutting the fuck up and cooking for her Nazi "doctor" husband like it says is her place in the fucking BIBLE.

  • Even the kitchen rejected her

  • Children of Republican Couples are "at risk" Children

  • Only in the USA...

  • wow what a hateful bunch in here

  • Michelle Bachmann fighting for Christin values! President Bachmann!!

  • @CARMELO23041 Michele Bachmann is a bigot. You can't be Christian and a bigot at the same time.

  • @CARMELO23041 Troll harder.

  • hahahahaha Newt is a moron... haha forward commanders at risk.. hahahahhahaha yea of coffee stains!

  • Personally if i choose to get married.. it will have nothing to do with a fucking church

  • Her man is Gay but married to her Proof of that is that she never had her own kids with this Pendejo Marcus Bachman who runs a pray the gay away clinic but is as gay as can be. Give me one night with Michelle and we would have kids BET ON IT! She is married to a gay sounding Gay acting dude BIG TIME!!!

  • B-I-G-O-T-S-!!! Seriously, are these people ever going to get it!?!

  • What a bunch of retarded, bigoted dickwads.

  • she didnt say anything about gay children being at risk children, I honestly dont think thats what she meant.

    She said that children of single parents and neglected children are at RISK children, not children of gay parents and risk meaning not forfilling their potential

  • A family is best with a man and woman. Surely she must think her mother cant look after children properly by her self?

  • I really want to punch most of them.

  • The real issue here is to pretend like people should have certain rights based on what kind of sex they like/what turns them on sexually. What about people who have a foot fetish? Should they have special rights, because they get turned on by feet? It’s the same thing really keep your sex in the bedroom, stop going around demanding to be a special class of citizen based on certain desires that you have.

  • She never said children of gay parents are are "at risk", but she implied that single family homes would tend to have children at risk. The "critical thinking" that is missing here is from the lefties. I think it's more of a darkend mind that doesn't traffic in the truth.

  • Bachmann MUST NOT BECOME PRESIDENT

  • Federal Government should NOT be involved.

  • I AM RUNNING FOR THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES. that is her line, and she sounds more and more like an idiot when she says......

  • Man, the entire panel is nothing but anti gay bigots. God's love is seen in all of them!

  • @ultim4t32 Not all of them. Although Ron Paul doesn't believe in gay marriage, personally, he says it's not up to him and his beliefs. It should be decided on the state level. And he does not have a problem with gay people. He's just old-fashioned about marriage like many people his age are. At least he's not gonna try to shut it down and write the definition of marriage being between a man and a woman into the constitution. That is huge, considering no one else is saying that.

  • Thank Mithra, Horus and Jesus that she has ZERO chance of winning.

  • I wonder, can straight parents raise gay children?

  • Agree with her lgbt should kill themselves I don't give a shiiiit

  • ughh a presidential candidate really?

  • Homosexual activists know the importance of words.

    Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which famous atheist Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".

    The word "gay" has helped homosexual activists push their dishonest, immoral agenda on unsuspecting people.

    The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationsh­ip being discussed.

  • @lightandbeautiful It's half-brained hicks like yourself that need to be educated on the nature of the world. It changes! Nothing stays the same, unless you're growing a beard under your chin and churning butter for fun. The word gay was not selected by those that it is used against. No one really knows where it really started, but to most, it is a derogatory term, among a cadre of others. Get a life.

  • this woman is a fuckin crackpot. How can anyone even consider this whackjob as a world leader.

  • i read once that the devil is not a monster with horns, but a person who will come to you with a smile on their face. some people say that homosexuals are that devil, but these republicans here are openly supporting discrimination agaisnt an entire group of people. so maybe BOTH homosexuals and republicans are the devil... either way better the devil you know, and as a member of the gay community i can only do my best with what ive been given, and hope to God it'll be okay<3

  • every single one of those candidates are evil. yes, even ron paul. don't let him fool you. he is just as bad as all those other radical extremist right wingers on that stage.

  • "whose lives are at stake" because the US govt put their lives at stake.

  • THese people are barbarians

  • The only reason why they are at risk is because of the fact that people like her are so successful at supporting homophobia in varying degrees of directness.

  • Let me just say I am not religious at ALL, so it does not play into what I am saying. I honestly feel that it is a rule of nature, the natural law of the world that a child has a mother and a father. The child who is not raised as such is missing out greatly on many things, and is being raised unnaturally. I see nothing wrong with a couple being gay, and if it is what they want than so be it. Let me add though, I do not think it is right to bring up a child in this way. This is my opinion.

  • @TheMarijuana3000 for not being religious and saying you think its unnaturral for a kid not to have a mom and a dad let me just say that in nature there are gay animals in nature there are gay parents in nature some makes give birth in nature some females kill the males after sex, what is natural is that a kid is raised in a healthy nurturing environment weather that be be by 2moms 2dad one dad one mom or a mom and a dad so be it

  • @cloudvszell I don't care enough about this subject to comment any further than offering my opinion.

  • WOW! does she really think is a big deal for someone of the same sex to raise a fucking kid. okay yea, i believe in the 10 commandments too bitch. but i also believe if two people are happy THEY SHOULD BE HAPPY TOGETHER! and if they wanna get married and have kids then thats perfectly fine. A mom and a dad doesnt make a good kid. it's HOW their raised. its the HAPPINESS within the family. It doesnt have anything to do with it. -_-

  • Why doesn't she advocate banning divorce?

    I can't believe gay issues have this much coverage in a debate. If I were asked these questions in a debate I'd look at the moderator and say "Are you fucking kidding me?"

  • The children who are most at risk are the ones raised by fundamentalist Christians, and are indoctrinated to believe that the earth is 6,000 years old and we are all descendants of Adam and Eve. Their critical thinking skills are never developed, and instead are crushed by religious dogma and replaced with blind superstition.

  • @MetalMilitia5488 The way I look at the issue you should not teach you kids creationism which is what you have implied. You should let your kids think for themselves and it is your job as the parent to get your child to develop these thinking skills but later in their lives let them take their course of deciding on a false superstition or introduce themselves to reason. What those fundamentalist Christians are doing to their childeren is sick so I do agree with you.

  • @jakeharris2010 We raised our kids on Biblical Christianity. They both have had academic scholarships through college. Our kids rock. Your kids will probably be working for people like them…. Unless you are only into gay sex.. Then you won’t have any kids unless you take them from people who have normal sex.

  • @Notafraid01 Kids like yours?? What are you talking about. My parents are conservative Christians or at least thats what they use to be. I grew up strictly in a heterosexual household my entire life, my parents instilled in me everything a normal parent would raising a child. Not once was I introduced to a gay remodel growing yup yet I still am gay before the fact and after the fact so SHUT UP! Your kids are no better then those in a different household, simply "brainwashed".

  • @Notafraid01 I have a scholarship too & I graduated in the top 15% of my class, so I guess I'm less of a person because your kids are straight and I'm not?? My parents love me unconditionally but unlike you, you are so caught up in religion that its ruined your heart as a human being. My parents are immigrants with college degrees & they make well over $300K a year, they raised great kids & they contribute more to this country then some of American homophobes.

  • @Notafraid01 Listen you bigoted dumbshit. I am 20 years old and have no kids at all and I have no intentions of having kids. Secondly I know a person who had lesbian mothers and he is straight went to university on scolarship and right now is advocating for gay rights in my state. Third with religious zelots like you no wonder when it comes to gay rights we are the laughing stock of any developed nation in the world. So if you don' mind take your comments to some right wing youtube page.

  • @MetalMilitia5488 You had to be a Metallica´s fan. Finally an American that is not brainswashed by the cult of your supremacy. the biggest threat to normal and balanced americans is from inside and not from China, Iran, Russia or North Korea. You Americans need to adopt a more European approach and mentality. God doesn´t exist and if he was real he would be a sadistic motherfucker...look at the world. 

  • One last thing - Fuck you Bachmann and your religion.

  • Children raised by homosexual couples are at risk? I'd like to the stats on that - comparing domestic violence, poverty, etc. between homosexual parented families and heterosexual - I'd bet just about anything that the hetero stats would show us that children are at far more risk being raised by heteros. Correct me if I'm wrong - but I've never seen a news item outlining a homosexual family being slaughtered by one of the dads or moms - and nary a homosexual family is shown on crackerTV shows.

  • OMG, is she Anita Bryants daughter or something

  • So why are any of these people being allowed to even have a chance at running for president? I thought it was about taking on a position where one can better influence the law makers in order to better serve the people. Not plan on making laws that will hinder the lives of millions of people. Oh well I guess I live in a fantasy world. Come 2020, there will be a candidate that will get more attention then any of these fools. Lets just stick it out and let them play. .

  • A series of fairytales written in a book thousands of years ago dictates how these people would ideally govern the US. This is why China will soon surpass us.

  • TRADITIONAL is not BEST. MODERN is BEST.

  • These people are the opposite of progress for our country. "well the bible says..." No, fuck the bible this is politics

  • My future seems so dim after watching this..... when the hell will this end! I want a life already, I'm tired of having to fight for it everyday waking day.

  • @Johncarson9113 Keep strong man.

  • @Johncarson9113 What goes on between 2 consenting adults in the privacy of their own bedrooms is between them. Stop wearing your sexual turn-ons like a badge! You are not special because your desires deviate from the normal order of life. Human beings aren’t essentially just a jumble of uncontrollable desires. We are a little better than that, because we CAN say NO to certain desires, and in fact SHOULD say no to certain desires…

  • @Notafraid01 And the fact that you think homosexual couples are only trying to defend their right to this so called "sexual desire" to be with the same sex simply for infatuation is beyond me. You have the intellect equivelant to that of a neanderthal. They are fighting for their right to marry, adopt, create the life they once dreamed they would have just the way your own life came together, who are you to deny someone that right?? Your just an ignorant person. worse, a Christan!!

  • Comment removed

  • If this dumb bitch (and the rest of them, excluding Ron Paul) believe that gay men and women are the evil in this country, then they seriously need to fucking get their priorities straight and take a look in the mirror.

  • Our world is corrupt with rude, selfish, ignorant people.

    If you can tell someone who is gay that their children are "at risk" because they like the same sex you're so heartless.

    Children out there are suffering, and being beaten by straight couples. Being raped and neglected by their fathers, and mothers. It can happen with anyone? So why are you putting gays under the bus? We're like everyone else you know. We HAVE feelings. We're HUMAN BEINGS TOO.

    It hurts to know people are heartless.

  • @neruallauren4991 I'm formally apologizing for her actions as a "Christian". We're not supposed to judge like this. I support gay rights, and you're right, you are human beings too. A sexuality doesn't define a person.

  • Expect for Ron Paul only other person i can see is Obama ,other are simply hopeless.

  • i think the worst part is that the question isn't even "are you for or against gay marriage"....it's "ok, we're all against it. now, what method are we going to use to get rid of it."

  • God im loving ron paul right now! He seems alot more logical and rational then the rest.

    RON PAUL 2012! :D

  • What a horrible, horrible person.

  • i love how she doesn't even bring up abusive parents... i guess its not as important as determining whether a kid's father likes penis or not

  • Comment removed