Dude, it's kinda still ripping off Perfect Blue, he just kinda paid for the right to do it. I mean, you can't say that he didn't copy the exact same scene...
So we all have influences that's how the world works. And he bought the movie to use just one scene so he is truly committed into his work. I don't mind as long as you give credit to the original source.
Everyone is inspired by works they have seen and Aronofsky is not different, he bought the rights for Perfect Blue to be able to do this scene which is just a complement to Kon Satoshi. Not really hard for him to do since his father was so rich and so was he, but he still gave credit to Kon. Secondly if you want to talk about people ripping off other movies or anime just look at any big named director. He ripped off of someone along the way, George Lucas, Quentin Tarantino and many more.
@theDoomguy2011 I don't think so. Kon did it great. Leave it be. Besides, can you really picture those amazing visuals of the pop-star Mima hopping along weightlessly working in live-action?
@LikaLaruku I love how you implying that Naruto fans don't watch Kon's work. It's possible to watch campy anime and great anime at the same time, bubba.
@ThoughtDivisionMedia He acquired the rights to remake Perfect Blue just so he could use this one scene. He fully acknowledges Kon's work as the true source of this scene.
@hugovedovato Darren Aronofsky did acknowledge that he based this scene off of Perfect Blue, he even bought remake rights for the entire film to just shoot this one scene since he thought it was so perfect. He did nothing wrong, sometimes art is so perfect in one state that you must copy it, which is fine, you must do it with respect though, which was what was done here.
@Lolligaggerton I understand, but then he did the entire Black Swan without acknowleding it is exactly the same plot of PB. And as far as the buying the rights, he hasn't state it himself, it's sth rumored. When asked if BS was based on PB, he only said that they might have their similarities, but the first wasn't an inspiration for the latter. Even when a mobie is made from rights-bought material, the director will often - if not always - credit the creator of the original story. He did not.
@hugovedovato Black Swan clearly drew inspiration from Perfect Blue, but the two are quite different in their approach of the subject, and the paths the characters take.
@hugovedovato Black Swan and Perfect Blue are so wildly different that any notion of Swan being a rip-off of Blue is purely superficial at best and absurd observatory paranoia at worst.
@hugovedovato "Even when a mobie is made from rights-bought material, the director will often - if not always - credit the creator of the original story." That almost never happens, 'cus they can get sued. IANAL. When they remade the Ring, for example, they credited Koji Suzuki. But no one really knows the details about the contract Aronofsky and Kon signed, other than their lawyers, so...
@Zerudah I understand what you said, and it's possible it went like that, but: 1) if he bought the rights, why not have the right to say he did so? How could he get sued over that? IANAL either, though...
@Pato88888 except in that case, the context of that is completely different in both cases.
in Swan, it's a part of Nina's freakout about 15-20 minutes near the end and happens when she returns home to her now estranged mother.
in Blue, it's part of a creepier sequence of Mi-Mania doing one of the Mima's Home blogs and her has no fuckin' problem imagining the Mima photos talking in his own personal whacked out mental wonderland from hell.
0:11 Subtle facial movement like she's about to cry, depicting frustration
0:38 Anybody seeing any facial changes? Anyone? No? The scene's been going on for 10 seconds since it cut to her face.
0:42 Oh, there we go, she was like a freaking rock before screaming. Was Jennifer Connelly told not to show any frustration even though she just gave a blowjob to get some drug?
Aronofsky got permission from the creators of perfect blue to use this scene in requiem and swan. Swan doesn't include the scream underwater. The permission also included the scene where Nina's paintings are talking (alike Me-Mania's stalking cave).
@HotdogsRuleForever actually aronofsky bought the american rights to the film just so he could do this one scene and draw inspiration from another scene in the film, talk about determination
Wow, so it's the first time something made by americans is similar to something made by Japanese, and not the other way around and all of a sudden all weaboos start a shitstorm. Requiem for a Dream is a masterpiece, deal with it.
@KINKYmustache Well, it's *not* the first time. [See the Matrix and the Lion King.] And if it's such a masterpiece, why did Darren need to go to Japan to use someone else's scene for it?
wow ppl are freaking idiots. Just because Darren Aronofsky bought the rights to use that one scene everyone hates him for being a "copier". He obviously admired the scene and if anything y'all should be happy that great work was appreciated to be recreated. If he was a copier and disrespectful he would have just taken to scene without buying the rights. grow up. its pathetic
@JackInTheBox1616 Except he's making millions of bucks on Swan, while Kon's family has to fucking practically give away Perfect Blue in Japan, because of how niche he was in that country.
@JackInTheBox1616 Agreed, strictly speaking the whole idea of buying rights to use a scene in this way is silly... he was obviously paying a tribute. I wonder how these same haters feel about sampling in music.
@Schniddo Um, people *do* get sued for sampling without authorization. And if it was a tribute, then why hasn't Darren said so recently? Same bullshit argument they've been using for Quentin until the guy started doing official remakes.
@majinshenmue Just because she doesn't scream 'bastards' doesn't mean the whole exact scene was used. Regardless if the director had brought the rights for just that scene. It's actually identical.
@jedichris5 there is no proof he even bought the rights, this is hearsay. and he himself never acknowledged the influence, going as far as to say : "no, they are completely unrelated"
@jedichris5 re-create hahaha bullshit, this is the perfect excuse for the lack of imagination and creativity, he's just a fucking copycat. He rips of frame by frame alots of sequences of perfect blue it requiem for a dream, and for sure he rip off the argument of perfect blue in black swan, he may called "perfect blue ballet version"
@parasiteve He didn't rip anyone off my friend. Darren was originally a huge fan of Satoshi's work in the past. Same thing with Nolan (Paprika/Inception). Their not simulating his achievements. It's simply just a respectful tribute to their early influence. Just like what Thomas Anderson did with Martin Scorsese. And what Spielberg did with Kubrick. And what David Lynch did with Salvador Dali etc. etc. etc....Without inspirations, where would the magic of excellent film-making be?
@massivecrown The Nolan thing's been debunked. But I do believe his brother is the anime fan in the family. As for Darren, if he's such a fan, why did he not give PB its due when the Kon family needed it most?
@parasiteve And Black Swan was just a foreshadow of Perfect Blue with a dash of Darren's dark stroytelling. He originally had it planned for the early 90's...But Portman was caught in the knot with her on-going schedule. So he dropped all plans for shooting, up until 2010. If you ask me I thought it was a brilliant movie. As a matter of fact, Perfect Blue didn't even pop through my mind while watching the first half. I was just so hooked man.
aronofsky tried to film a live-action remake of perfect blue, or at least that was his first approach before engaging to making requiem for a dream,, actually perfect blue quite drove aronofsky when writing the script and making the film thereof, as some kind of "tribute" to the movie which his stemmed from he included the bath tub scene, and yeah the black swan is the ultimate approach on perfect blue, requiem for a dream, quite overrated; the black swan, close to master-work a film
requiem for a dream is better just because she is so anguished she doesnt have the words there. Both are good though as the scene wouldnt be there if it wasnt for Blue.
@McRaims it's because the director of "requiem for a dream" darren aronofsky bought the scene from perfect blue precisely for this movie. that's why they are the same :)
The overhead shot of Nina in the bathtub is an exact replica of a shot in the Japanese anime thriller Perfect Blue (1998). Prior to Requiem for a Dream (2000), Darren Aronofsky bought the remake rights to the film just to use that one sequence.
i think that black swan and perfect blue have simple similarities about their fundamental plot lines but i dont think that they would bare any resemblance to any ordinairy viewer.
I saw Perfect Blue before seeing Black Swan and at no point did Black Swan remind me of Perfect Blue. I don't consider the films to be similar at all.
@HGLatinBoy Same here :/ I specifically watched PB before BS just to make comparisons, but there weren't any. Some of the themes were the same, but meh.
To say that Black Swan has no humanity is just ridiculous. Black Swan really makes you feel for the Nina character, especially if you can relate to how controlled she has to live her life and the pressures that are put upon her. It's one thing to be a PB fan, it's another thing to be unable to recognize a film inspired by it on its own merits.
The wrestler was a good movie but black swan is just an exploitation film with no real thought or humanity when compared to perfect blue. PB is truly about identity and finding who you are when you step away from the people who force and connive you into doing things. I think he bought the rights to PB mainly cuz of his newest film not really for requiem.
@bpophantom You are simply ignorant or uninformed then. Arronofsky has acknowledged similarities between Perfect Blue and Black Swan. He didn't buy the rights to the movie, he simply bought the right to remake this one scene. He met with Satoshi Kon about this. And, while Perfect Blue and Black Swan have a similar style they are VERY different. Perfect Blue deals with issues of fame while Black Swan is more about artistic performance.
@videosarefun69 Whether or not he bought the whole movie rights or just one scene doesn't take away from the fact that PB (more than a couple of similarities) inspired Black Swan ALOT. Black Swan isn't a bad movie but when people hype up the film to be deeper than what it is that's disturbing and it's def. not as emotional or striking as Perfect Blue. And the hype around Natalie's performance is sad. And issues with fame and artistic performance shouldn't be what makes the 2 films different.
@bpophantom Okay lets calm down now. Not going to argue with you but he bought the rights for Requiem not Black Swan. He acknowledged the similarities but he insists it was not an influence.
@videosarefun69 I was calm while I was typing and I didn't feel an argument. I'm just saying that even though he insists it's wasn't an influence it was very obvious what was there.
The RFAD sequence seemed too melodramatic and forced with the music. Plus, i know its animation but the ever so subtle facial movements in Perfect Blue add a little intensity. Like she is really cracking up. RFAD is just some woman screaming in a bath.
And I love how Aronofsky refuses to give influence from Satoshi Kon. Pay some respect towards anime. Its at scenes like these that make Hollywood sick.
Why not at least promote Perfect Blue in the English-speaking world at the same time? Western directors have presented foreign movies before, like Tarantino with Hero.
Need to see Perfect Blue. Seen Requiem. Love the replication. The Requiem one was just...CREEPY. It's like Marion lost everything (well she did just give a pimp a blowjob for drugs).
You need to see Perfect Blue as soon as possible. They're different movies sort of (since Requiem is about people losing their dreams from drugs, and Perfect Blue is about stalkers, killers, delusions, and losing your mind to show business), but they are both disturbing. Perfect Blue is amazing.
esa pelicula tiene una direccion arrechisima, every escene is the shit man and i didnt know bout the perfect blue recreation scene, i read he actually owns the copyrights so he could do it exactly as the original dat is PB
I somehow saved his first feature for last, saw Perfect Blue last night and have now watched everything Satoshi Kon directed. I thought I had seen this scene before....
@ravingrabidpugTICTAC Hey, mind giving me a short list of anime films that aren't about robot cults? Googling elsewhere, too, but I got the impression that you know your shit so I figured I'd ask.
YESSSSS!!!11!!!! I noticed this immediately when watching Perfect Blue and I'm so glad this video is on here to show me exactly how similar they are! COOL! SUPER!
From watching the side-by-side comparison I can say this: The animation quality is amazing.
bin1127 1 week ago
Even more so after watching both kon is further along. Even after death. He skips the lesser thoughts and focuses on the epiphany.
What he has done makes it easy to understand blackswan. Perfect blue is a thought or two beyond Such comprehension.
duckflorist 4 weeks ago
It still shows me a medium that's ten years ahead of another.
duckflorist 4 weeks ago
Dude, it's kinda still ripping off Perfect Blue, he just kinda paid for the right to do it. I mean, you can't say that he didn't copy the exact same scene...
bloodmuch 1 month ago
So we all have influences that's how the world works. And he bought the movie to use just one scene so he is truly committed into his work. I don't mind as long as you give credit to the original source.
sayonarasuicide 2 months ago
@sayonarasuicide Too bad he didn't give credit on Swan...
Zerudah 1 month ago
Everyone is inspired by works they have seen and Aronofsky is not different, he bought the rights for Perfect Blue to be able to do this scene which is just a complement to Kon Satoshi. Not really hard for him to do since his father was so rich and so was he, but he still gave credit to Kon. Secondly if you want to talk about people ripping off other movies or anime just look at any big named director. He ripped off of someone along the way, George Lucas, Quentin Tarantino and many more.
SpeakSoftly117 3 months ago 2
I don't remember that moment in the film. Is that a deleted scene or something?
gghice1 3 months ago
I think that Darren Aronofsky should try doing a full remake of Perfect Blue.
theDoomguy2011 4 months ago
@theDoomguy2011 I don't think so. Kon did it great. Leave it be. Besides, can you really picture those amazing visuals of the pop-star Mima hopping along weightlessly working in live-action?
BalmungSama0 4 months ago
HOLY SHIT!
tbirdit086 4 months ago
Perfect Blue is the anime I lend to anyone who tells me cartoons are for kids. I also give it to like Naruto fans & tell them "this is REAL anime."
LikaLaruku 5 months ago 4
@LikaLaruku I love how you implying that Naruto fans don't watch Kon's work. It's possible to watch campy anime and great anime at the same time, bubba.
TheMarkSasuke64 3 months ago
Mind = blown! Seen both, absolutely LOVED both!
Asylum86 5 months ago
lost so much respect for aronofsky. could he at least have changed 1 shot? slightly?
ThoughtDivisionMedia 5 months ago
@ThoughtDivisionMedia He acquired the rights to remake Perfect Blue just so he could use this one scene. He fully acknowledges Kon's work as the true source of this scene.
BalmungSama0 4 months ago
connelly is so hot.... jesus, aronofsky paid copyrights for the scene, chill out fanboys
ideoteqa 5 months ago
Wow, u r so original u artsy douche!
GabeHellFire 5 months ago
Man, FUCK ARONOFSKY! HE SHOULD AT LEAST ACKNOLEDGE THAT!!!
hugovedovato 5 months ago
@hugovedovato Darren Aronofsky did acknowledge that he based this scene off of Perfect Blue, he even bought remake rights for the entire film to just shoot this one scene since he thought it was so perfect. He did nothing wrong, sometimes art is so perfect in one state that you must copy it, which is fine, you must do it with respect though, which was what was done here.
Lolligaggerton 5 months ago
@Lolligaggerton I understand, but then he did the entire Black Swan without acknowleding it is exactly the same plot of PB. And as far as the buying the rights, he hasn't state it himself, it's sth rumored. When asked if BS was based on PB, he only said that they might have their similarities, but the first wasn't an inspiration for the latter. Even when a mobie is made from rights-bought material, the director will often - if not always - credit the creator of the original story. He did not.
hugovedovato 5 months ago
@hugovedovato Black Swan clearly drew inspiration from Perfect Blue, but the two are quite different in their approach of the subject, and the paths the characters take.
BalmungSama0 4 months ago
@hugovedovato You're kidding ?! Exactly the same plot ! The only similarity I can see is that both leads project fantasies and have a dark side.
Toshidetoshi 3 months ago
Comment removed
hugovedovato 3 months ago
@hugovedovato Black Swan and Perfect Blue are so wildly different that any notion of Swan being a rip-off of Blue is purely superficial at best and absurd observatory paranoia at worst.
GasmaskAvenger 2 months ago
@hugovedovato "Even when a mobie is made from rights-bought material, the director will often - if not always - credit the creator of the original story." That almost never happens, 'cus they can get sued. IANAL. When they remade the Ring, for example, they credited Koji Suzuki. But no one really knows the details about the contract Aronofsky and Kon signed, other than their lawyers, so...
Zerudah 2 months ago
@Zerudah I understand what you said, and it's possible it went like that, but: 1) if he bought the rights, why not have the right to say he did so? How could he get sued over that? IANAL either, though...
hugovedovato 2 months ago
@hugovedovato Well, he'd be taking credit for someone's work...
Zerudah 2 months ago
aronofsky also used the talking photos scene in perfect blue for the talking portraits scene in black swan
Pato88888 5 months ago in playlist Budha For Mary
@Pato88888 except in that case, the context of that is completely different in both cases.
in Swan, it's a part of Nina's freakout about 15-20 minutes near the end and happens when she returns home to her now estranged mother.
in Blue, it's part of a creepier sequence of Mi-Mania doing one of the Mima's Home blogs and her has no fuckin' problem imagining the Mima photos talking in his own personal whacked out mental wonderland from hell.
GasmaskAvenger 2 months ago
0:11 Subtle facial movement like she's about to cry, depicting frustration
0:38 Anybody seeing any facial changes? Anyone? No? The scene's been going on for 10 seconds since it cut to her face.
0:42 Oh, there we go, she was like a freaking rock before screaming. Was Jennifer Connelly told not to show any frustration even though she just gave a blowjob to get some drug?
aquapendulum 6 months ago 3
Aronofsky got permission from the creators of perfect blue to use this scene in requiem and swan. Swan doesn't include the scream underwater. The permission also included the scene where Nina's paintings are talking (alike Me-Mania's stalking cave).
HotdogsRuleForever 9 months ago
@HotdogsRuleForever actually aronofsky bought the american rights to the film just so he could do this one scene and draw inspiration from another scene in the film, talk about determination
Foxhat134 8 months ago 19
Also in Black Swan when you see the mother's paintings talk, it's exactly like the talking pictures in Mr. Memania's room
TheNEWfilmfanatic99 9 months ago
It seems to be an homage to a great movie.
headphonic8 9 months ago
Wow, so it's the first time something made by americans is similar to something made by Japanese, and not the other way around and all of a sudden all weaboos start a shitstorm. Requiem for a Dream is a masterpiece, deal with it.
KINKYmustache 9 months ago 6
@KINKYmustache Well, it's *not* the first time. [See the Matrix and the Lion King.] And if it's such a masterpiece, why did Darren need to go to Japan to use someone else's scene for it?
Zerudah 9 months ago
@Zerudah Sorry, can't be arsed to follow the comment trail, but it's Satoshi who licensed 'Requiem;' not the other way around.
Mattjblythe111 8 months ago
@Mattjblythe111 Not sure how that makes sense, since PB predated Requiem...
Zerudah 8 months ago 2
@Mattjblythe111 LLO where do u get that idea! Perfect Blue 1997, Requiem for a Dream,,,2000!!!!!!!
jalusbrian 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KINKYmustache Sorry, can't be arsed to follow the comment trail, but it's Satoshi who licensed 'Requiem;' not the other way around.
Mattjblythe111 8 months ago
wow ppl are freaking idiots. Just because Darren Aronofsky bought the rights to use that one scene everyone hates him for being a "copier". He obviously admired the scene and if anything y'all should be happy that great work was appreciated to be recreated. If he was a copier and disrespectful he would have just taken to scene without buying the rights. grow up. its pathetic
JackInTheBox1616 9 months ago
@JackInTheBox1616 Except he's making millions of bucks on Swan, while Kon's family has to fucking practically give away Perfect Blue in Japan, because of how niche he was in that country.
Zerudah 9 months ago
@JackInTheBox1616 Agreed, strictly speaking the whole idea of buying rights to use a scene in this way is silly... he was obviously paying a tribute. I wonder how these same haters feel about sampling in music.
Schniddo 9 months ago
@Schniddo Um, people *do* get sued for sampling without authorization. And if it was a tribute, then why hasn't Darren said so recently? Same bullshit argument they've been using for Quentin until the guy started doing official remakes.
Zerudah 9 months ago
@Zerudah Sure they do, all I'm saying is ethically I don't see a problem with that.
Schniddo 9 months ago
@Zerudah I never seen Requiem for a dream, but I read somewhere That he bought the rights for "Perfect Blue" just for this scene.
sugahrockz 7 months ago 4
Perfect Blue, Perfect Blue, Perfect Blue. MY GOD PERFECT BLUE. <3
SOOLTV 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
does anyone have the scene in black swan?
shahoney 10 months ago
how is this a remake? isn't this EXACTLY how it happened in the film?
majinshenmue 11 months ago
@majinshenmue Just because she doesn't scream 'bastards' doesn't mean the whole exact scene was used. Regardless if the director had brought the rights for just that scene. It's actually identical.
SOOLTV 9 months ago
Wow... Darren Aronofsky is a fucking copier.
ivanclaysburgh 11 months ago 5
@ivanclaysburgh Read more, he bought the rights from the creators of Perfect Blue, go to IMDb or Wiki , retard
And he never Barged about it ether.
gulagga371 11 months ago
He didn't rip off Perfect Blue, folks. He actually bought the rights to the film just so he could re-create this scene.
jedichris5 11 months ago 42
@jedichris5 yeah but he denies even that perfect blue was a inspiration for black swan.
khosrow 10 months ago 3
@jedichris5 there is no proof he even bought the rights, this is hearsay. and he himself never acknowledged the influence, going as far as to say : "no, they are completely unrelated"
hugovedovato 3 months ago
@hugovedovato There's proof that he at least visited Japan, since Kon blogged about it.
Zerudah 2 months ago
@jedichris5 re-create hahaha bullshit, this is the perfect excuse for the lack of imagination and creativity, he's just a fucking copycat. He rips of frame by frame alots of sequences of perfect blue it requiem for a dream, and for sure he rip off the argument of perfect blue in black swan, he may called "perfect blue ballet version"
parasiteve 3 weeks ago
@parasiteve He didn't rip anyone off my friend. Darren was originally a huge fan of Satoshi's work in the past. Same thing with Nolan (Paprika/Inception). Their not simulating his achievements. It's simply just a respectful tribute to their early influence. Just like what Thomas Anderson did with Martin Scorsese. And what Spielberg did with Kubrick. And what David Lynch did with Salvador Dali etc. etc. etc....Without inspirations, where would the magic of excellent film-making be?
massivecrown 2 weeks ago
@massivecrown The Nolan thing's been debunked. But I do believe his brother is the anime fan in the family. As for Darren, if he's such a fan, why did he not give PB its due when the Kon family needed it most?
Zerudah 1 week ago
@parasiteve And Black Swan was just a foreshadow of Perfect Blue with a dash of Darren's dark stroytelling. He originally had it planned for the early 90's...But Portman was caught in the knot with her on-going schedule. So he dropped all plans for shooting, up until 2010. If you ask me I thought it was a brilliant movie. As a matter of fact, Perfect Blue didn't even pop through my mind while watching the first half. I was just so hooked man.
massivecrown 2 weeks ago
@massivecrown Actually, he planned it for the early 2000s when he got the remake rights to PB.
Zerudah 1 week ago
aronovski i don't like you anymore, i love satoshi kon rip
dzpixel 11 months ago
lol it was ripped off
Karami 11 months ago
aronofsky tried to film a live-action remake of perfect blue, or at least that was his first approach before engaging to making requiem for a dream,, actually perfect blue quite drove aronofsky when writing the script and making the film thereof, as some kind of "tribute" to the movie which his stemmed from he included the bath tub scene, and yeah the black swan is the ultimate approach on perfect blue, requiem for a dream, quite overrated; the black swan, close to master-work a film
alexoalez 11 months ago 3
Epic scene for two perfect movies. 'Nuff said
zmario1994 11 months ago 4
i looooove requiem for a dream. never seen perfect blue though. the bath scene in requiem left such a haunting impression on me
zmdiscovery 11 months ago
requiem for a dream is better just because she is so anguished she doesnt have the words there. Both are good though as the scene wouldnt be there if it wasnt for Blue.
MalonsMilk 11 months ago
Comment removed
smokethevidence 1 year ago
I just saw Requiem and knew that this shot looked familiar.
AvatarYoda 1 year ago
is the fucking same!!
McRaims 1 year ago
@McRaims it's because the director of "requiem for a dream" darren aronofsky bought the scene from perfect blue precisely for this movie. that's why they are the same :)
a17morseth 1 year ago
@a17morseth
No they are the same because he did it the same. He just coppied Perfect Blue , like he did with his new movie.
And to prevent any lawsuit he bought the right of the movie.
sampaio 1 year ago
also compare lain and pi. but the strange ting is that both where produced at the same time.
khosrow 1 year ago
The overhead shot of Nina in the bathtub is an exact replica of a shot in the Japanese anime thriller Perfect Blue (1998). Prior to Requiem for a Dream (2000), Darren Aronofsky bought the remake rights to the film just to use that one sequence.
ScaryManiac 1 year ago
WOW
anubis846 1 year ago
i think that black swan and perfect blue have simple similarities about their fundamental plot lines but i dont think that they would bare any resemblance to any ordinairy viewer.
treemonster123 1 year ago
Two utterly perfect films.
GayGeisha 1 year ago 2
Black Swan borrows so heavily from so many movies.
kevonmartini10 1 year ago
I saw Perfect Blue before seeing Black Swan and at no point did Black Swan remind me of Perfect Blue. I don't consider the films to be similar at all.
HGLatinBoy 1 year ago
@HGLatinBoy Same here :/ I specifically watched PB before BS just to make comparisons, but there weren't any. Some of the themes were the same, but meh.
strtthshw 1 year ago 2
To say that Black Swan has no humanity is just ridiculous. Black Swan really makes you feel for the Nina character, especially if you can relate to how controlled she has to live her life and the pressures that are put upon her. It's one thing to be a PB fan, it's another thing to be unable to recognize a film inspired by it on its own merits.
kiaseli 1 year ago 3
Aronofsky bought the rights to Perfect Blue
Wh0rse 1 year ago 4
@Wh0rse
He really cared about it, then.
I think he should oversee everything Satoshi Kon related.
cambaprecoz 1 year ago
The wrestler was a good movie but black swan is just an exploitation film with no real thought or humanity when compared to perfect blue. PB is truly about identity and finding who you are when you step away from the people who force and connive you into doing things. I think he bought the rights to PB mainly cuz of his newest film not really for requiem.
bpophantom 1 year ago 2
@bpophantom You are simply ignorant or uninformed then. Arronofsky has acknowledged similarities between Perfect Blue and Black Swan. He didn't buy the rights to the movie, he simply bought the right to remake this one scene. He met with Satoshi Kon about this. And, while Perfect Blue and Black Swan have a similar style they are VERY different. Perfect Blue deals with issues of fame while Black Swan is more about artistic performance.
videosarefun69 1 year ago
@videosarefun69 Whether or not he bought the whole movie rights or just one scene doesn't take away from the fact that PB (more than a couple of similarities) inspired Black Swan ALOT. Black Swan isn't a bad movie but when people hype up the film to be deeper than what it is that's disturbing and it's def. not as emotional or striking as Perfect Blue. And the hype around Natalie's performance is sad. And issues with fame and artistic performance shouldn't be what makes the 2 films different.
bpophantom 1 year ago
@bpophantom Okay lets calm down now. Not going to argue with you but he bought the rights for Requiem not Black Swan. He acknowledged the similarities but he insists it was not an influence.
videosarefun69 1 year ago
@videosarefun69 I was calm while I was typing and I didn't feel an argument. I'm just saying that even though he insists it's wasn't an influence it was very obvious what was there.
bpophantom 1 year ago
Harry was screaming because when he closed his eyes he saw chuck norris's face :)
deadlyponiezzzz 1 year ago
Wait why was she screaming underwater
hankwest988 1 year ago
The RFAD sequence seemed too melodramatic and forced with the music. Plus, i know its animation but the ever so subtle facial movements in Perfect Blue add a little intensity. Like she is really cracking up. RFAD is just some woman screaming in a bath.
DomIstKrieg 1 year ago 7
I like PB, but RFAD was better!
sibowittz6 1 year ago
I really don't like that dramatic music building up in requiem it feels very weak imo compared to perfect blue which doesn't force anything.
bpophantom 1 year ago
Comment removed
bpophantom 1 year ago
Whoa, 18,000 views!
facepuncher456 1 year ago
And I love how Aronofsky refuses to give influence from Satoshi Kon. Pay some respect towards anime. Its at scenes like these that make Hollywood sick.
WDPizzle 1 year ago 3
@WDPizzle He bought the whole remake rights just to have this one scene in Requiem.
icybergie 1 year ago 5
@WDPizzle He refuses to give influence from Kon? Really? That's why he paid for the rights to Perfect Blue so he could film this scene?
ckyvick666 1 year ago 14
@ckyvick666 He refuses to give credit now. I heard he did on the Requiem commentary, though.
Zerudah 1 year ago
Comment removed
ckyvick666 1 year ago
Requiem for a scream.
Why not at least promote Perfect Blue in the English-speaking world at the same time? Western directors have presented foreign movies before, like Tarantino with Hero.
Conchobhar 1 year ago 3
Two masterworks.
RashHunt 1 year ago 5
I love both movies, but Satoshi Kon will always be the best. RIP.
taqu 1 year ago 6
Satoshi Kon died today. RIP. The master will be missed. :(
TheGoodGuysWearBlack 1 year ago 39
naw, requiem for a dream, ALL the way.
SocialButterflyxx 1 year ago
Can't wait for the PB/Black Swan/Princess Tutu mash-up.
Zerudah 1 year ago 7
@Zerudah I'm glad that there are two of us. :)
eahamilt 1 year ago
Need to see Perfect Blue. Seen Requiem. Love the replication. The Requiem one was just...CREEPY. It's like Marion lost everything (well she did just give a pimp a blowjob for drugs).
SithSymbiosis 1 year ago 3
@SithSymbiosis
You need to see Perfect Blue as soon as possible. They're different movies sort of (since Requiem is about people losing their dreams from drugs, and Perfect Blue is about stalkers, killers, delusions, and losing your mind to show business), but they are both disturbing. Perfect Blue is amazing.
michaeljacksonyall 1 year ago 6
god I love this!
RedMoonX42 1 year ago
The director of Requiem For A Dream bought the right of remake of Perfect Blue just because of that scene
VikkyRz 1 year ago 20
Both perfect films
StrugglingActorBlog 1 year ago 3
esa pelicula tiene una direccion arrechisima, every escene is the shit man and i didnt know bout the perfect blue recreation scene, i read he actually owns the copyrights so he could do it exactly as the original dat is PB
weedaol 1 year ago
thanks for this comparison!
marknesium 2 years ago
When I saw Perfect Blue I immediately knew I saw the scene before...and there it is ;) Both movies are awesome
fffreakhc 2 years ago
I love Perfect Blue.
latequilera22 2 years ago 81
@latequilera22
Me too ^_^
Pwnd80 2 years ago
Me too, awesome movie.
JordanMillward1 2 years ago
@latequilera22 perverted weirdo...
deadlyponiezzzz 1 year ago
I somehow saved his first feature for last, saw Perfect Blue last night and have now watched everything Satoshi Kon directed. I thought I had seen this scene before....
HowardFair 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
lol he paid $59,000 just so he could copy that one shot. just come up with something similar, dude!
OscarMaris 2 years ago
yep, darren bought the rights to perfect blue just for this shot.
yummymayo 2 years ago 11
@yummymayo
this is the type of thing one would have hoped the uploader would put in the video description
WLDFLD 1 year ago
perfect blue is better
ravingrabidpugTICTAC 2 years ago 134
@ravingrabidpugTICTAC Pervert...
deadlyponiezzzz 1 year ago
@ravingrabidpugTICTAC are you nuts?
WarriorPublic 1 year ago
@WarriorPublic how perfect blue is a masterpiece of film making anybody who doesn't watch it because it is anime is an idiot .
ravingrabidpugTICTAC 1 year ago 2
@ravingrabidpugTICTAC Hey, mind giving me a short list of anime films that aren't about robot cults? Googling elsewhere, too, but I got the impression that you know your shit so I figured I'd ask.
smokethevidence 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ravingrabidpugTICTAC You're an idiot, your comment was nonsensical.
Charliem1994 6 months ago
@ravingrabidpugTICTAC no its not. dont be rediculous
JackInTheBox1616 9 months ago
YESSSSS!!!11!!!! I noticed this immediately when watching Perfect Blue and I'm so glad this video is on here to show me exactly how similar they are! COOL! SUPER!
GerudoThief 2 years ago 5