A Look at Ron Paul

[Quex01]

Ron Paul just agreed again, that this fictional Al Quiada (CIA front group in Afghanistan) was responsible for 9/11 attacks.

[cineasta71]

"We cant maintain our empire" Well said man...

[bkayganich]

Of course hes controlled opposition. Thats why hes still talking.

[maze311]

I believe he is controlled oppositions, like Alex Jones. However, I do respect his ideas presenting here. A man always do something for two reason: a good reason, and the REAL reason....

[xoxgodofgodsgodxx]

Schell, thank you for the video.

And the "I Got Five on it"motif put a smile on my face.

[HolidayFortnight]

@xoxgodofgodsgodxx It doesn't get much better than old school hip hop and free markets

[johnbisaac93]

He is the one who should have been president. We will never know, because the people don't think of the Lord when they vote. It's not as if He didn't give us a good choice.

[delyshBB]

I'd like to know why is sovereignty relevant if I can just move to the US and become American and vote. This means I'm exercising political power over Americans. Sovereignty is an irrelevant concept in a world where you can be citizenship by any other means, but birth.

[roobadoob1984]

our last and only hope

[barrycw1]

Ron Paul is an incredibly smart guy with some great ideas that sometimes even sound wacky at first - they arent

He's far the best of an incredibly bad lot of national type politicians. However, he does not pledge undying support for Israell.

Oops, since the news media is totally run by 'chosenites' I guess he'll never even be heard

Well, we sure found out that fact last year!

[Realiteit01]

I believe he is controlled opposition also, but time will tell.

[user13467]

Ron Paul, another Man-God for the sheeple. He's a freemason too, fucktards.

HAIL LUCIFER!

[Nuker1337]

@user13467 He's a member of John Birch Society, and probably council for national policy too, but his ideas still seem sound.

[mattandpatti222]

@Nuker1337 He is a pro-CATHOLIC! the NEW World ORDER is the ROMAN CATHOLIC ROME! wake up! Jesuits/NWO

[Nuker1337]

@mattandpatti222 Well, there are those who believe jesuits are behind everything, but most of them seem to have really strange ideas (eg. Eric Phelps, who runs vaticanassassins).

[lvsoad22]

@mattandpatti222 Some people say the NWo is jewish. Some say its roman catholic. Some say its atheist. Nobody really knows.

[TheVikingNinja]

who, nice video, i normally don't like ron paul, but i never heard him say some of the things he said in this video.

[johnnyblazze911]

does not matter how many times he runs he will never get proper air time thus most voters wont know much about him. most americans perfer to do the what tv tells them to do or the cool think like vote for obama. even by some miricle he gets voted in he will be shot no other way for an honest man.

[sadface0]

I hope he runs again in 2012. He is a genius.

[soccom8341576]

Intellect and moral courage are very powerful tools yet rare.

[starlight1946]

Is he saying 911 was not an Inside Job or could it be he scared to admit it? Alex Jones never got Ron Paul to admit that.

[espo359]

Ron Paul is my Homeboy.

[Amy31415]

It is simply disgusting that this man was smeared during his campaign and that his ideas were ridiculed.

There is no other politician that I have half as much respect for as him.

[DAWAXXX]

American are stupid instead voting this man they vote good actor.

[napalmcoffee]

OBhaamhaa , will fix every thing because every one knows Will Smith wins in the end

[sidious76]

Ha! Classic line mate, i'm gonna use that on the Obama worshippers...

[LimblePwns]

my faith in humanity would have been restored... shame...

[gaggOLF]

If the president has any power to change whatsoever, Ron Paul was the best choice.

I feel sorry for you America :/

[big27bread]

He is the only one that truly makes sense with all the policies.

[FriscoRider]

god bless ron paul

[Person009]

Are you an anarchist?

[tnichols321]

Ron Paul has 5 on it!

[RenneDanjoule]

Yea, but unfortunatley I think lots of people might vote for McCain because they dont want socialism.

[bbburton]

I can understand differences of opinion, but I cannot agree to ignore facts. Those who blindly disagree with Ron Paul simply choose to ignore the facts. McCain and Obama choose to ignore the most important and crucial facts at home and abroad. To ignore these facts is to leave ourselves vulnerable an susceptible to repeated and more directed attack upon our troops and our citizens. There is no honor in pursuing a failed domestic or foreign policy that leads to endless war at home and abroad.

[sidrosteel]

That sounds like Ron Paul.

[slammah2012]

There is no Stopping Ron Paul...

WRITE HIM IN AND PHOTOGRAPH YOUR BALLOT AS RECEIPT

[greatbroad]

The republic has been overthrown for decades; we just haven't been told. Don't want people to panic. This is one giant soap opera, and the super-rich laugh about it at their exclusive parties.

JFK's autopsy photographs have been proven to be fakes. His brother's death in the kitchen had a recorded 13 gunshots.

--Yet the public is told nothing about these things, outright. Slowly, we have our prosperity drained away by the fascist vampires. When it is all gone, we will become the NAU.

[MuhammadVonRaven]

Ron Paul is a brave man for speaking such views few other American politicians dare to speak. But, because of what he said about Israel, he'll never be allowed to attain a position of power!

[DecentralizedTommy]

"We cannot tell the arabs to get lost, they have a lot of oil, and we have to protect our oil without offending Israel" -Ron Paul

[RPFS2008]

Wow. Not only do you take the quote out of context, you change the quote to better fit your agenda.

The full quote is :  "With the Arabs, we cannot tell the Arabs to get lost. The Arabs are important. They have a lot of oil under their control. We cannot flaunt the Arabs and say, get lost. We must protect our oil. It is called ``our oil.'' At the same time, there is a strong constituency for never offending Israel."

[DecentralizedTommy]

I went by memory. I have no agenda. That is what paul said, and he is wrong.

It's not our oil, and we absolutely have no business protecting anyone else's oil. in fact we dont need any foreign oil whatsoever, it is the corporations that you worship, that sell you cars, and fossil fuel, and keep you addicted to big oil.

[RPFS2008]

"It's not our oil, and we absolutely have no business protecting anyone else's oil"

That is exactly what he is saying.

You either have an agenda, or you have trouble interpreting plain English.

And I don't worship corporations. I just know that the Government we have is like sh1t attracting flies. Don't twist my words aswell, please.

[DecentralizedTommy]

that's not what he is saying. He is saying we cant tell the Arbas to get lost, they have a lot of oil, and we have to protect that oil, and hopefully we can protect the oil without offending Israel.

You learn how to read!

My only agenda is to get you people that worship politicians to stop! no politician is going to save you. The agenda for true liberty is the Ni4D

trusting politicians is not working

[RPFS2008]

He is commenting on the policy in place at the moment!

Jeeez, give it up. You are making yourself look foolish.

PS. I dont worship Ron Paul, or any politician. You are right, they arnt gonna save you. However, they,however rare they are, can educate you and get you interested in fighting for freedom.

Again, I ask you to admit you have misunderstood the quote/speech.

[DecentralizedTommy]

...and says we still have to protect the oil. and he is wrong about that.

[RPFS2008]

Still waiting...

[DecentralizedTommy]

you're wrong

happy now?

[RPFS2008]

Are you 13 years old ?

Tip: Come back to politics when you have grasped how to interpret English or, when V for Vendetta isn't your main political motivator.

Enjoy your last word, since I won't waste my time on pseudo-Freedom Fighters, like you.

[DecentralizedTommy]

I'm 42 yrs old.

I've been at this longer than you.

I understand how exciting hearing libertarian views are for the first time. Put you have think look at that long term goal, and understand that no country using Austrian economics, because it is a fallacy. It's pure unrestrained capitalism, cooperate geed, globalism.

I stand for nationalism. I say buy USA made products only, and to rid ourselves of being dependents on china's slave labor for basic needs.

[RPFS2008]

Save your patronizing. I certainly havent just been exposed to libertarian views. Ive understood real freedom for years and have been educated in economics.

Seems you are rather naive when it comes to isolating the US from the world. That is a one way trip to the downfall of the US. The rest of the world, who have some kind of freetrade between them , would quickly overtake the US.. if the US exists for any great length of time isolating itself.

[DecentralizedTommy]

when you call people 13, and say come back when bla bla bla

fine

dont act so surprised when someone treats you how you want to be treated

I said over and over fair trade. that these free trade agreements are killing our economy.

Your solution is to trust politicians, have open borders and a free trade frenzy super NAFTA

you fail

[RPFS2008]

I'm not surprised. Infact I care little about it.

You misrepresent my solution. My solution isnt trusting politicians. That is exactly not what I am about, and you know it.

Im past arguing about free trades and NAFTA's etc with you. All I want is for you to accept the reality in the speech Ron Paul made, with which you have taken out of context. Surely you can admit when you are wrong cant you?

[DecentralizedTommy]

We're not helping china's labor workers, we're enabling them, we have to boycott china until their treat people with human decency, or at the very least have fair trade- you buy x amount from us, and we'll do the same, that's being fair, but we wont do that if it undermines one single american industry. Tariffs are a must, our forefathers demanded tariffs, and they were right! Equally of foreigners should boycott american products, until she ends all wars, and occupations.

[DecentralizedTommy]

Throwing insults based on your guess work, only makes you out to be the fool.

enjoy being so naive to how corprotism works.

I'll continue to push for democracy and real liberty via the Ni4D

you can continue on the same path we have now- trusting politicians, and the failed republic

[RPFS2008]

I didnt mean it as an insult for insult's sake. I dont respect you twisting reality - in this case a quote - to fit your argument. Infact it is quite disgusting.

YOu act as tho "corporatism" is somekind of self sufficient devil. Well, it isnt. It can only be fed by large centralized government with no respect for the Consitution. A cure is to throw out every single person in office who has violated the Constitution.

Another one could well be the Ni4D. I havent yet looked into it, but I will.

[RPFS2008]

But when I do, make no mistake, I wont try and twist its aims and processes to paint a different picture.

I have as much respect for, for twisting the truth, as I do for the media when they do the same. If you really are fighting for freedom, then you must also hate the likes of Fox, CNN etc.

[RPFS2008]

"as much respect for you* , for twisting the truth...."

[DecentralizedTommy]

I'm not twisting anything.

I point out to the ronbots how he is not what he claims to be. Ron Paul is for open borders, and the majority of his worshipers are not.

I can go on and on and point out many things that ron paul says he is, but really isnt.

[RPFS2008]

"Ronbots", "worshippers". Yea, mature.

Open Borders is a little more complicated. I am for both. In the short term, with the threat of terrorism and the fact we have rampant welfare, it is not advisable to have open borders. In the long term, open borders are a must for a free society.

[DecentralizedTommy]

yes we know. ronbots flip position once they fond out their leader ron paul is actually for open borders. so of course, you have to switch position and continue to follow your leader, that is going NO WHERE

[thedemoboy]

Actually RP is not for a "fence" or "wall" he's all for getting rid of welfare for illegal immigrants. If you stop feeding the parasite, the parasite leaves - or starves. You're either a McCain fan who sees RP as a threat, or you're part of the Obama-nation that thinks there should be hand outs for everyone.

[DecentralizedTommy]

actually ron paul is for open borders. and I'm not.

I dont support any politicians, especially AIPAC whores like obama and McCain

[thedemoboy]

if you dont want open borders, thats fine. but illegals will still find a way into the country as long as there is incentive to do so.

[DecentralizedTommy]

no kidding. That's why the law should be enforced, for anyone that gives them any job, no mater what it is. Stiff penalties and jail time.

[RPFS2008]

Again, you speak to me as if you know me. I've believed in freedom along time before I even knew of Ron Paul. I don't agree with him on everything, but I voted for him because he is a man with a voting record that is consistent with his views. Him and Gravel were the only decent candidates.

[DecentralizedTommy]

He's not consistent, and has his followers fooled.

He preaches against amnesty, but voted for a pathway to amnesty 3 times.

He knows his supporters are against open borders, so he is very careful as where and who he talks about his long term goal of open borders at. He is a deceiver, like all politicians are

[RPFS2008]

You have blatantly twisted, or misunderstood, the quote.

There are 3 possibilities here.

1. You still dont understand what he was saying

2. You know exactly what he was saying, but twist it to fit your "exposing of Paul".

3. Your Pride wont allow you to admit you made a mistake

Of course you can come back with "4. I am right" , but to anyone with an ounce of intellect can see that is not the case.

[RPFS2008]

We could argue all day long about Government, policies, regulations etc etc , but this is something that is not up for debate once you read the whole speech.

[DecentralizedTommy]

read the whole speech? LMAO

I told you about it, I made two videos about it.

get a clue!

he is wrong to protect oil in the ME

He is wrong on the Israeli Palestine conflict, ron paul is n old man, who is not running for president, get over him. move on

[DecentralizedTommy]

wrong

you have the fragile ego problem

ron paul is wrong to say we have to protect the oil in the middle east. again sir. we don't need that oil. we have the technology now to get rid of our foreign oil dependency, but big oil in bed with politicians and automobile corps like GM dont want to risk a new avenue when they're making billions now.

Ron Paul voted against initiatives for alternative energy.

[RPFS2008]

Fragile ego problem? Where do you get these things from?

"ron paul is wrong to say we have to protect the oil in the middle east. again sir. "

Are you freaking insane? Read the God damned speech again. You have got to be kidding me. Is this a wind-up? You seriously need an education if you still cannot see how stupid you are looking by continuing to reject the reality of the speech. Jesus Christ

[DecentralizedTommy]

okay smart ass.

show me where in the speech do you see ron paul saying we do not have to protect the oil in the middle east without offending Israel?

show me!

[DecentralizedTommy]

keep pushing the global agenda. whilst having paranoid delusion that I twist things bec i must have some secret agenda LMAO That fact of the mater is your idol worship of a politician as left you blind, wake the hell up kid!

[RPFS2008]

Where in the hell did I say you had a "Secret agenda"? Idol worship? wtf? You speak to me as if you know me. Kid? I am not the one who has a kid's reading, and interpreting, capacity.

[DecentralizedTommy]

You said I must have some agenda. You're delusional.

You deny the fact that ron paul said we have to protect the oil in the ME. I dont. you think I must have misunderstood, no. you have. and you refuse to acknowledge that you F-ed up. Ron Paul said that, HE SAID IT.

It is what it is. the end of that one, because you are wrong, ron paul is wrong top have ever said that. WE DO NOT NEED FORIEGHN OPIL NOR SHOULD WE PROTECT FORIEGHN OIL

[RPFS2008]

Yes, but not some conspiratorial secret agenda like you made it out to be.

Yes those words came out of his mouth. But you cant just take a quote and put it in a vacuum and say "look at this!". It is as plain as daylight he was talking about the friggin modern zeitgeist surrounded the ME, Oil and the Pal. Conflict.

Just read the next line in the speech . Look at how he emphasised "its our oil" as if to mock those that say it, an indirect general quote.

What school did you go to? damn....

[DecentralizedTommy]

Look, I don't like the idea of the US having top protect foreign oil interest. Ron Paul does. we will never agree that the US should protect foreign oil interest- doing that has caused so many wars. what school did you go to?????

not the school of peace

[RPFS2008]

"Look, I don't like the idea of the US having top protect foreign oil interest. Ron Paul does."

Complete outright lie.

Keep diggin...

[DecentralizedTommy]

that is not lie. read the whole speech. try actually listening to the politicians you worship like a sheep.

I have to go. you're lying, making up shit, totally naive, an uneducated fool.

enjoy your cult worshipping of a politician.

I will continue to laugh at retards like you. C ya!

[RPFS2008]

That, my friends, is an example of a guy who doesn't have a leg to stand on.

[AHM1776]

"my friends" ???

What are you ... McCain?

As if HE has a leg to stand on.

Obama and the Democratic Party are going to BURY McCain if the GOP is stupid enough to choose him as the nominee.

w w w .  DVDs4Delegates . c o m

[RPFS2008]

Ha, wondered how long it would take for someone to say that.

Obama is just as bad as McCain, albeit for different reasons.

[RPFS2008]

He was commentating on the illogical actions of funding both sides of the conflict. Which is obvious with the full quote, and even moreso with the full speech.

You clearly have an agenda, that is not "exposing corruption"

[DecentralizedTommy]

and he is wrong on that to. we never have funded, or treated, the Palestinians as equal to the Israelis, never.

For him to think that doing nothing (from now on, since we have already armed Israel to the teeth) is the way to get to a two state solution is so moronic it's not even funny.

[DecentralizedTommy]

Israel must abide to all UN resolutions. But of course ron paul would never agree to peace. Nor will ron paul feed, and bring medical supplies that the UN (who voted against the Iraq war) does to thousands of people, daily.

[DecentralizedTommy]

Ron Paul doesn't believe in globalism? are you kidding me, Mr ron paul?

"Once we have string economy, we'll want open borders, because we'll need those workers" -Ron Paul

He's not for NAFTA/CAFTA, but only because of special interest, he is for open free trade, and some how thinks magically the corporations that run this country and all politicians will magically disappear because greed will no longer exist in ron paul free trade frenzy la la land

[DecentralizedTommy]

whereas americans are expected to compete for wages with communist china/mexico and anyone else that wants to undermine american industry via slave labor. Television tells america what they want to buy at walmart, dumb america buys foreign products and wonders where all the jobs went and the economy is poor. Some people have to stop worshipping these corporatism globalist libertarian ideals, and start getting with a real viable solution,

[DecentralizedTommy]

the republic has failed, we must have a true democracy, trusting in politicians is not working. Enact the Ni4D and bring the power to the we the people, so we can have an actual venue to make our voices count, and hold these corporatism globalist warmongering politicians accountable.

[DecentralizedTommy]

strong* economy, not 'string' oops lols

[RPFS2008]

There is a difference between greed and control.

Greed is an over-used term, which people only use about other people. Greed isnt the problem, it can not be "fixed", its the venues that allow illogical greed(greed that serves to benefit oneself at the behest of everyone,and the economy, as a whole) to flourish and take control of all aspects of society.

Supposed "anti-corporatist" legislation infact serves only the large corporations , treading on the small up and coming businessman.

[RPFS2008]

*of all aspects of society that is the problem

[DecentralizedTommy]

That's my point, greed does exist and is not going away. I'm fighting for small business, and ron paul is fighting for NAFTA on steroids with open borders a super corporitism world, wheres all cooperation's go unchecked and unregulated. You live in america, stop thinking competing for wages with china is some sort of solution, its not. Free trade is not a cure, it's the problem.

[RPFS2008]

How can Free Trade be the problem. We dont have Free Trade.

What you say about RP is a slap in the face to logic. YOu cannot be fighting for the small business man when you you want regulation. Regulation is what has killed the small businessman and benefited the corporations and helped create Monopolies.

[DecentralizedTommy]

The free trade we have now is killing our economy. Having a true open free trade frenzy super NAFTA on steroids is not a cure, it doesn't stop the free trade we have now, it only allows for it to be even bigger, you want to force Americans to compete for wages with communist china, countries with poor economies, so dumb americans can buy the cheapest products, but at the expense of american industry and our own economy.

[DecentralizedTommy]

You're slap in the face of logic is you confusing tariffs and equal fair trade, which are the regulations I'm talking about, remember the free trade bs of a like that ronbots and libertarian market super NAFTA worshippers push for, with regulations for outrageous health cost thanks to the very same corporations that have a monopolies that free trade promotes. You're fighting for globalism, and dont even know it.

[RPFS2008]

And of course, the venue I speak of is big centralized government. Is it any wonder why large corporations spend all their time in Washington? If Government was small and local - as the Founders set up the US to be - then you couldn't have corporations making the rules for the whole country.