India Travel - India Population

[superking445]

@fabergeMarks If that is the case then how come at every till in supermarkets such as Tesco, Asda etc there are Indians working. Trust me, most of the Indians in the UK do shit jobs!!!!!!1

[gumri5000]

Nice

[Mrsansonic]

" India is 2nd to China with the highest population in the world" Complete rubbish, it is simply a lie. What stats are there to back this claim up? The ministers responsible for this estimates are lying to give their country greater importance.

[pimezon]

@Mrsansonic:you are a fucking moron. go check all reliable demographic source and you will learn for yourself bonehead. people like you is the reason india stands with it's head hung in shame. understand the situation before it is too late.

[TheIxtlan]

God said, Be fruitful and multiply.

[cool2bhigh]

india and china are not thinkin of whats gonna happen in the next 50 years? if anything they'll be the first to be affected because there wont be enough food to sustain all of them, china is already eating magots and grass hoppers and all the other gross creature's that were'nt supposed to be cunsumed by humans , my question is Why do you need so much people if a third of you guys live in poverty?

[pronatalist]

To cool2bhigh:

India and China don't need to think so much about what will happen in the next 50 years, because who can know that?

I call tell you already. World population should have grown larger, and denser. By a few more billions, say the demographers. Maybe India or China may each have 2 billion people, maybe somewhat less. It's their right to grow to so many, and all the while, humans are figuring out better and better ways to ENLARGE our populations everywhere, whatever need be.

[pronatalist]

To 250mxrider:

No, India doesn't need to attack its people with some barbaric 1-child policy. India has every right, a universal human right, to be populous, and for so many parents to naturally enjoy having their children.

1-child policy probably wasn't even China's idea, but Western contraceptive imperilists leaning upon China, for fear of "as goes China so goes the world." To make "slaves" of the people, and to set precendent for anti-pop global tyranny.

Let human race grow and progress!

[SickOneBro]

That's nothing but uneducated paranoia talking. The entire world is over populated and is being destroyed.

[pronatalist]

To SickOneBro:

How do you call my statement "uneducated paranois talking?" Commie Chairman Mao claimed a large and growing population would make China strong. Doesn't China still honor Mao? So why don't they still encourage naturally large families?

I know "as goes China so goes the world" may seem to apply, that's a reason why I advocate "traditionally very large" families in China as well. As I am pronatalist, and advocate a more heavily, densely populated world, for freedom and children.

[oEDLIo]

@pronatalist

a universal human right? Ok let's let India have as many kids as it wants since it's her right but with one condition. No indian should go and live outside India. I choose to make 2 childrens so they can heredity more land and resources. If India wants to not control it's overpopulation it shouldn't be my problem.

[pronatalist]

To oEDLIo:

Sorry, it doesn't work that way. It's not just India that is multiplying population, but Muslims, the entire world. Migration is a valid population accomodation tool, among others. India has 3 people per 2 acres of land, average, way above the 125 people per square mile, 5 acres per person, of the world average. The whole world is growing ever denser with people. And only the globe offers any "real" boundary.

People's own countries should 1st accomodate them and kids, but also world

[oEDLIo]

No, it does work like that. The west is controlling the population. The one that doesn't are the ignorant and the poor. I don't want emigration in my state. If you can't make your state a better place for your kids then don't breed like a rabbit and occupy the land of others who manage it properly.

[pronatalist]

To oEDLIo:

The only population "control" I see as necessary, is just the very lax controls I see in the Bible. Get married first, and love and spend time with and provide for all your children. No arbitrary restriction on how many, other than maybe natural fertility fecundity.

"Birth control" is unnatural, anti-life

A world with so many people should expect at least some population "leakage" into other countries. Perhaps we agree that it increasingly may take the entire planet to hold us all?

[oEDLIo]

"Birth control" is unnatural, anti-life? families have always did birth control. It's called logic. If I have 20 kids (if I want I can) I'm pretty sure they will leave in poverty, no education. They'll probably end up being criminals. We all make birth control because we can't feed a large number of kids. That's what is birth control. Is natural.

[pronatalist]

To oEDLIo

I don't support any arbitrary "cap" on world population size, for the obvious reason that we may exceed it. Who really wants draconian anti-family, anti-child restrictions upon births, other than educated morons?

I do expect countries to take the first responsibility in absorbing their own natural increase. However, people are not plants, and migration is a valid accomodation tool. With all this corrupt talk of tyrannical globalization, why not let people spread and flow more freely?

[Nostro200]

1000000000 people

20 atomic bombs help to equilibrating the number

But doing that we would kill animals ther are in nearly extinction

so 500000, 50 cal. machine guns would help

XD

If they dont act with ther numbers Hitler will rize LOL

[pronatalist]

To Nostro200:

Why did you write such a morbid comment?

It's okay for India to have a billion people. So many people like living and they have to live somewhere. Actually, it was a billion officially in 1999. Now it's more like 1.1 billion.

Let the human population size rise naturally, so people may have freedom, and so more children can come alive. There's no need to "control" numbers, because humans are supposedly intelligent, and there's so much we can do to ADAPT to our growing numbers.

[Nostro200]

To pronatalist:

ok I tell you

If this continius at this way human race will be extint by it self

[pronatalist]

To Nostro200

There are alternative ideas to consider

On some TV episode of Twilight Zone, or was it The Outer Limits, the world is about to end due to some major crisis, so all the world's leaders, and the best and the brightest people, all load onto some spacecraft and blast off into outer space, leaving the rest of us all to perish! Then, surprise! surprise!, the world doesn't end after all. It was the world leaders ruining the world apparently. Then the crisis is - how to stop their return!

[backatchalol]

u fail

[pronatalist]

To oEDLIo:

You don't want emigration in your state? Why? Emigration is people leaving, which means other outside lands then are presumably helping to support the natural increase of all the people in your state. You then are on the benefiting side of the overspill of growing population, aren't you?

I believe the planet actually is big enough for all the people there ever will be. But national boundaries were usually drawn by violent war, and aren't fair. Can't change them. So help and share.

[oEDLIo]

No, I don't want emigration. This is my land and that is your land. If you overpopulate your land is not my problem. Why you want to come in my land? Because you didn't manage it properly. Your land is over flooded. My land is not empty. I just choose to manage it properly. Now your problem becomes my problem too. This will surely brings conflicts.

[pronatalist]

To oEDLIo:

Like it or not, the planet is globalizing. Due to the now "huge" human numbers, and easier mobility and rising wealth of people. I oppose the cabal conspiratory merging of political power with unaccountable politicians, but I like the "natural globalism" of most nations growing denser in population and populating into each other.

So a foreign college student travels to another country and meets somebody, and marries. What's wrong with that? There's plenty of land to go around/share.

[pronatalist]

To oEDLIo:

If many immigrants come into my U.S., that shouldn't in any way diminish how many children I may have. We now have 306 million, but to be on par with average world population density, we should already have 500 million.

My old home Church supported a missionary to Bangladesh. He said something in his newsletter about how huge/dense the population is there. When he visited us, I told him my reasons for urging large families worldwide. He and his wife soon had a baby in Bangladesh.

[pronatalist]

To oEDLIo

We should end all this runaway government welfare that is drawing in immigrants to the U.S. That doesn't mean to shut the door, just that immigrants need to have their own money, or get a sponsor, or seek gainful employment. They need to learn English, behave themselves well, to be welcome to stay. I believe in "breeding like rabbits," and I welcome them to do so also. I don't believe in this "environmental" scarcity religion. There's plenty to go around if we develop what God gave us

[oEDLIo]

God gave us? I didn't realize you were a religious person. That explains a lot about your comments. Peoples like you are not responsible about the earth because you think that this life is temporary. God somehow knows how to deal with it. For me that doesn't believe in these medieval fairytales this is a problem because the only one who is responsible for the future of this planet therefore the future of our kids are the humans. This is our only planet and our only life.

[pronatalist]

To oEDLIo:

I am very conservative Protestant Christian. However, I often don't "religious preach" a lot around here, because everybody can find a Church, TV church, or Bible, and I have to consider my (secular?) audience. Besides, I have so many philosophical, natural, practical reasons for large families.

I am very responsible, frugal, don't litter.

But the greater good of the many demands we welcome as many children as come, natural flow of human life, keep door to life open, compassion.

[pronatalist]

To oEDLIo:

Did you get what I meant about the missionary? It's still very possible for humans to procreate many children, in the midst of a "crowded" land. Perhaps he thought so as well. Maybe a little of that "when in Rome ..." nonsense? But I think he had better reasons. Did he have only 1 child? I seriously doubt it, could be 7 by now? Just lost track of him since then.

I don't fear the U.S. might someday grow as dense as India, as it would come very gradually, and we would be used to it.

[250mxrider]

India need to implicate a 1 child policy like China. Pass it on.

[rishi083]

I wish that happens ASAP..... M afraid