More evidence/ impacts of climate change news, for those interested..
.
Biggest polluters hold up deal at UN global warming talks
.
China, the U.S. and India, the three biggest polluters, maintained their resistance to a time line leading to a legally-binding climate treaty, threatening efforts to keep up the fight on global warming this year.
when alex jones and fox news are saying the same thing what does that tell you? climategate is a cia mossad deception. how obvious does it have to be that the common thread is OIL and imperialism.
why is alex jones against avatar when the movie points directly to 911 truth
climate gate is a cia mossad deception designed to protect the military industrial complex
Climategate 2.0 has started TODAY!!! Thousands of emails leaked by a whistleblower and they are JUICY and SPICEY! Marc Morano has some great links to the emails.
@Strange0ne climatedepot com is Morano's website. In the new emails, many alarmist scientists concede that Michael Mann's research is embarassing and they want no part of it. They even admit they went on a campaign to delete McIntyre's comments from realclimate com. And they discuss strategies to avoid FOIA... And lots more. These new emails are more damaging than the first set...
Hahaha!!! What are you? What are you? Who pays you? Who pays you?!!!! According to the WHO (thats the World health organisation, not The WHO are you? WHO pays you? boom-boom katching!), theres been Malaria throughout Russian history and the last outbreak was just after WW2....
The apparent "falling temperatures" are from tree ring proxies only in northern Russia.
Proxies were made by constructing a mathematical relationship between measured temperatures from 13 weather stations and tree ring growth in Russia. Since the 1960s, rising temperatures in 13 weather stations in Russia no longer reflected by tree rings.
However, the claim that trees in Russia show a cooling trend is based on only 13 weather stations, 6 of which were closed down in 1990!
This was a funny debate but the Russian fellow is totally blagging it - even *I* know Russia has Malaria and always has. If he is mistaken/lying here, then what about the Global Warming issue? Pollution IS a problem, no doubt, and needs to be sorted out but Global Warming is a somewhat seperate issue to these "localised" environmental problems. I wonder about the idea of the West trying to hold the rest of the World back, this strikes me as a bit silly but there IS a potential catastrophe there.
I bet if we somehow doubled the amount of CO2 in the air, we could probably turn deserts into jungles. Then we could chop them down and turn them into farm land and support 10 times as many people on the planet. So I say LETS PRODUCE MORE CO2 FOR THE GOOD OF HUMANITY!!
If CO2 was such a problem, why is it that indoor and outdoor garden aficionados use dry ice and CO2 generators to double or triple the amount of CO2 for their plants in order to make them grow bigger? The fact that gardeners do this tells me that there’s probably not enough CO2 in atmosphere for plants to reach their full potential. And any additional CO2 created by our little activities, is quickly being absorbed.
@CokeSupply - She's half right and half wrong. Plants can thrive on it to a degree. After a certain point if plants get too much CO2 they "sweat" less and can eventually succumb to acidosis. Even if they don't make it to the acidosis phase they become less nutritious as they "sweat" less and their acidic and sugar composition changes. Herbivores can start dying out as they can't eat enough plants to sustain themselves. There's a reason why plants from previous eras died out...
@A86 And yet indoor gardeners and industrial indoor framers usually maintain a CO2 concentrate two to five times that in our natural atmosphere throughout the entire lifecycle of their plants with out them "eventually succumbing to acidosis".
@CokeSupply - The Earth's climate is significantly different today and most plants from back then would not be able to tolerate today's climate (not enough CO2 for them today). If CO2 levels increase too high eventually most modern plants and animals could end up going extinct as we're not adapted for climates from Earth's past.
However, we should be far more worried about dying from extreme weather from greenhouse buildup and the havoc it can wreak on the ecosystem.
@CokeSupply - Much higher than the CO2 concentration now. Above 600-700 ppm. At the current rate of pollution it would take more than a century to reach that concentration, unless our pollution rates increase and/or deforestation increases faster (which it very well could, unfortunately).
The more immediate danger is flooding due to polar ice caps melting from the excess heat and the excess heat affecting pressure cells and causing more intense storms across the planet.
@A86 Hmm that's interesting... because there's videos on YouTube of plants growing in 1200ppm and they are thriving and growing larger and heavier and producing more fruit. I will find one and put it on my channel homepage for you to see :)
What's a "pressure cell"? I've never heard that phrase before
@CokeSupply - It depends on the type of plant. Some plants can grow well at that CO2 concentration (particularly more ancient plants) and some turn yellow instead of green at that concentration.
That concentration would make humans and many animals sick over a prolonged period though. Being exposed to that much CO2 for months and years on end would make humans have a headache and increase carbon sicknesses. The Earth would be several degrees warmer and the ocean level hundreds of feet higher.
@CokeSupply - I was referring to weather, weather has cells.
"where did you read...getting sickness from breathing 1200ppm carbon dioxide"
Sorry, but this just lets me know you have little knowledge about this subject:
en (.) wikipedia (.) org / wiki/ Carbon _ dioxide # Toxicity
There's a reason you breathe OUT carbon dioxide instead of in. There's a reason why spacecraft and submarines have CO2 scrubbers and why your mother would sometimes suggest you go outside and get fresh air.
@richiemagnet90210 - No one said they don't or won't. The fact you even said that shows you truly do not understand this scientific issue.
The problem is that less and less of the water re-solidifies into ice because it's too warm for more of it to freeze. More water freezes the colder it is (sea salinity causes some water to be effectively "supercooled").
"Increase in hurricanes in the USA in the last 100 years?".... Until now... Hurricanes in Boston and New York are not normal. And 2011 is the most expensive year in terms of natural disasters (already)..
The call from hundreds of scientist from all over the globe to stop the increase in CO2
concentration in the atmosphere was the result of overwhelming evidence. Science is based on evidence not rhetoric. The Russian scientist is therefore correct!
All around the world governments are imposing a carbon tax. But Star Scientific's Muon Catalysed Fusion produces NO CO2 so therefore NO CARBON TAX. Also NO Nuclear Fission waste, it is completely safe, NO Fukushima here.
If you care about the cost of your energy you will want this: "..could cost as little as 0.9c per kilowatt" see blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath" July 01 post
OK, climate sceptics: here's the raw data you wanted
' dispel the myths that the data has been inappropriately manipulated, and that we are being secretive," says the university's pro-vice-chancellor for research. "Some sceptics argue we must have something to hide... released the data to pull the rug out from those who say there isn't evidence that the global temperature is increasing'
w w w.newscientist.c o m/article/dn20739-ok-climate-sceptics-heres-the-raw-data-you-wanted.html
Five independent inquiries cleared the scientists involved of any wrongdoing. Sadly, these findings were hardly reported at all in comparison to the original scandal. Consequently many, including me, thought something sneaky had gone on. Today I actually went and checked for myself. I was wrong.
The short version is that phrases taken out of context looked damning. If you read the sentences the phrases came from, and take the time to find out what their terms mean, the scandal disappears.
The claim of greenhouse gas theory as the cause of global warming is a fraud created to make huge amount of money. The Powers That Be are the ones behind this fraud and also many other problems.
Check out my website which can be accessed through my channel for a big picture of what is going on in the world.
It's not easy to catch a scientist lying because they possess expert knowledge. In the rare case they are caught out jump on it! This is bad scientists giving bad advice to our politicians, look at the de-sal plant being built at Wonthaggi that's going to cause Melbourne to pay five times as much for water! Wake up to these snake-oil salesman they're about to fleece you!!!!
this is so daft you got a news anchor that is bias towards global warming you got a greenpeace globalwarming CO2 junkie going all out with the lies and the weatherman is the joke making it that global warming is fact anything else is lies yes if you talk about global warming at work or with friends and you say to them "I dont believe humans can contribute so much to globalwarming in the last 150 years or so they look at you as if you are crazy or you just one of those conspiracy people.
Whenever a scientist says something you should look at 2 things. First is the actual facts presented, of course. But second, is who is paying this guy. It is in governments interest to increase their power, and for the people to willingly go along with it.
Mars is also undergoing climate change. I don't see too many people driving 4X4's there or any industrial activity for that matter :D Who would think climate change is due to the sun lol. They even changed the name from global warming to climate change due to the fact the earth is actually cooler now than in times when humans had no industry or technology.
the REASON it is impossible to argue AGIANST global warming, is because EVERYONE that believes it, knows nothing more than: a bunch of scientists believe it and they say it is proven.(then the scientists present a graph with an upward line.)
I believed in global warming 110%. i thought i had it all figured out. oil companies deny global warming cause its bad for business.
I WAS WRONG! as i researched global warming in detail, it made me sick how biased i could be.
@topologyrob global warming is a hoax you idiot. look into it, and yes- i know better then the "experts" because the majority of them are lying idiots.
@UrSoMeanBoss Actually global warming is a very strong scientific consensus - try reading science rather than blogs (either that or stop using computers - they rely on science, along with medicine, transport...).
You don't know better than the experts, and I hope it's not long before you start being part of the solution.
@topologyrob thumbed up to make yo feel better- because the temperature has actually been dropping since 2001~, and why is the surface temperature of other planets heating when the earth was also heating and they were blaming CO2? why does CO2 FOLLOW (not lead before) temperature rise?
do please answer, because even Einstein would be interested how my car's CO2 is reaching mars..
@UrSoMeanBoss The trouble with your arguments is that none of them (apart from the snow where you are - local weather, not particularly relevant) have survived the scientific process, and have thereby not made a dint in the overwhelming consensus amongst climatologists. Unless you can cite scientific publications where these points are supported with evidence?
@UrSoMeanBoss what "science" is hiding is that the solar cycles since around 1940 have been the highest in recorded history, and while they had tapered off since their highest, they are still higher until 2000 than the mean average throughout history. Thus it is a fallacy to assume as they often do that the earth should have dipped into a near immediate cooling cycle around 1980. Sun output was still higher than normal. AND the increased output saw massive melting of polar ice releasing methane.
"i know whats wrong with their theories, and Climate change is real- they just seem to keep forgetting about the giant ball of nuclear fire in the sky, and instead they focus on the flames in your engine" -me.
@topologyrob concensus, huh? How many people make a career of something they believe is a hoax?
So why should we fall at the feet of scientists who pursue their preexisting beliefs as if it's a religion? They have NO objectivity on the matter, and the day a group of "climate change researchers" publish a paper declaring it's not a problem, the next they will be cleaning out their desks looking for a new job.
God you people are suckers. If it's been warming it's solar variation.
@batvette It's a consensus of evidence. No beliefs are required.
I think you could do with some genuine scepticism. Where is the evidence for your claims? Reliable, reproducible evidence?
If a scientific paper demonstrated solid evidence that human-induced climate change was not a problem, a Nobel prize would be the very likely result. Not being sacked.
@batvette It would not end their career. It's just that no one has been able to provide evidence. If they did, they'd be a hero in science. Scientists change their minds all the time when the evidence changes - that's what science is. It's true that emissions have risen since Kyoto. Some of this is because China and India are lifting their people out of poverty, with plans to peak in 2020. China's also investing heavily in alternative energies for the future. Your point?
@topologyrob It wouldn't end their career? SURE. Governments and institutions would continue to fund them with grants indefinately to study something they just disproved!
Oh, and China and India are lifting their people out of poverty! Of course they are, it's called INDUSTRIALIZATION.
Now what did they say causes global warming? Human Industrial Activity. To fix it, they sell us a plan which results in the industrialization of hundreds of millions of 3rd world people. Questions?
@batvette I am very sceptical about your claims that evidence produced to change the consensus on anthropogenic climate change would not be lauded by the scientific community. Produce some evidence or pipe down.
What would be your solution to rapidly solve poverty in China? Would you deny Chinese people the right to prosper? The fossil-fuel solution is temporary.
How many climate change scientists are there who pursued this as a career but thought from the beginning that it wasn't happening?
And I'm sorry but wasn't Kyoto all about addressing global warming? What are you doing talking about solving poverty or making people prosper in China? I'll tell you why: You like many liberal environmentalism as religion ideologues also have global socialist agenda, and feel self loathing for being born in a "have" ctd
@topologyrob nation- as well as hate the environmental damage due to prosperity and consumption. So like Kyoto's architects your agenda is to restrain the industrialized nations as much as possible, transfer their wealth to third world nations, and turn a complete blind eye to blatant environmental abuses by their corrupt governments and offer our corporations incentives to help industrialize people who would not have been. The two agendas are contradictory, and you don't see that.
@topologyrob Catholic Priests are experts on God and the Bible. But would you go to a church and rely on them for an objective view on the existence of God? Stop hiding behind a false authority with "science". These researchers pursued this like it was a religion all their careers, dissenters never made a career of it. Climategate merely showed the fascist nature of their "science".
@batvette Your comparison is unpersuasive as Catholicism is not based on evidence, but faith. Science deals in evidence. What evidence do you have that Climategate shows anything "fascist" about science?
With such an attitude towards science, don't you worry when you use a computer?
@topologyrob LOL, promoting "science" as pure, as if it cannot be severely tainted by the humans engaged in it.
Climategate showed they kept info away from skeptical review, sought to marginalize any dissenters, conspired to rig the peer review process. Didn't you know?
@batvette Climategate showed none of those things. The propaganda tried to say that, but the evidence is not there. Only lots of cherrypicking and misrepresentation, as several independent inquiries have shown so clearly. Even those are disputed by the desperate believers of propaganda. Where are the real sceptics?
@topologyrob Your ignorance of the facts on that is not a credible position.
Emails showed they conspired to marginalize staff of a peer review publication for potential for dissent. Emails showed they withheld data from other scientists who were seeking to replicate their results because they expected skepticism. Inquiries showed no CRIMINAL behaviour but if there was nothing to it we wouldn't be discussing it.
@batvette I am vastly sceptical about the claims made about "climategate" by right-wing propagandists. They have spread misinformation, out-of-context nonsense, and confusion. the only reason we're discussing it is because the media made such a mess by believing the shysters that a lot of people seem to think the stolen emails have some negative effect on the science. They make no difference in the slightest to the validity of the science. Don't be so gullible.
@topologyrob no it shows he conspired with his peers to ensure news reporters would not have access to information which, if reported, could harm his chances to get that siemens grant.
@topologyrob You're standing behind this "evidence" as pure scientific fact as if it were produced with objectivity and following the scientific method. The emails contain numerous examples of these researchers willfully tainting that scientific method by obstructing other reseachers from duplicating their results, rigging the peer review process, etc.
I'm sorry that the concept of manipulating statistics to gain results favorable to an agenda is so foreign to you.
@topologyrob The scientific method involves repeatability and peer review.
The emails repeatedly display examples of the CRU witholding data from outside review . CRU director Phil Jones told Australian scientist Warwick Hughes in a 2005 email: "Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it."
@MikeFromTheUK1 but, how would independent scientists benefit from carbon taxes? I mean honestly, why the hell would carbon taxes make a difference what independent scientist say?
climate change has nothing to do with HUMANS it is global and the sun....so dont tax me for something that has nothing to do with HUMANS......Climate change has to do with the sun and space......what do you think that humans can fix the sun and space really now....tell this people that want to tax the hell out of working people to go and tax there own mothers........
Just wanted to say that I checked on the Professor's assertion that malaria had appeared in Russia before and he's correct, it has appeared as far back as 1824, in Siberia, Ukraine and the shores of the Black Sea.
The world has been cooling for the past 7 years. Not saying which direction Mother Nature is gonna go, but it's a fact.
And he's right about the first world wanting to keep the rest of the world behind.
So true. There are real "green issues" like pollution, depletion and erosion of soil, pesticides, GMO, resource depletion etc... THe "green" movement has some very corporate mnded membership and AGW is a coporate, for profit, scam.
Much respect to Piers Corbyn he tells it how it is the Elites run this world & will contitinue to decieve many & at the same time blame us for current elite masterminded agendas which is all about control he also knows the elite triggered global economy hoax which will make the rich get richer and the poorer worst off people really need to start waking up to this NWO extremism
CLIMATE CRIMINAL Exxon was caught funding a huge disinformation campaign about global warming. This is one of the reasons so many people don't understand the realities of global warming, or they are complicit or participating in the criminal disinformation scam. Read the report: Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco’s Tactics to Manufacture Uncertainty on Climate Science -- ucsusa . org/publications/catalyst/exxon-exposed . html
They are going to claim they have been spraying berium and it cooled off the planet and saved the day! no one is thinking ahead, they will make this claim, just watch!
3:47 "how do you explain that here i am in moscow and there is no snow when there should be....bla bla bla"
now that they are covered in snow and the USA is covered in it, and despite them saying that future generations might not know what snow is....they claim that its due to climate change.
is there any weather condition that isnt directly linked to climate change? hot, cold, wet, dry its essentially unfalsifiable nonsense.
It is a political ideology foisted on us by the green enviro -nazis
increasing world population affects resources availability therefore increasing carbon dioxide production, but that has no impact, right?
The scientific community is not to be trusted. They're all biased all around the world except for the small minority who deny the climate change, specially in USA. It's a world-wide conspiracy! I'm sure that emails taken out of context are more important than evidence and the scientific consensus. I guess HIV is a conspiracy too to buy antiretrovirals
So he gets someone from Russia barely coherent in English to present the pro-climate change view and a "weather forecast" to speak against. Who would you believe?-a Russian, probably former Communist, or you friendly English weather forecaster?
Relax people. AGW isn't a hoax and there's no conspiracy, but it has indeed been overly politicized. Climatology needs higher standards of validation so that we can make good public policy decisions. If you'll excuse me, I have a general circulation model to compute.
Russian Scientist is LIER, I have the same Question: Who Pays Him? How Much M. F**! Few of these ILLuminati, Zionist Free-Masons + world leaders PLAYing with the LIVES of 6,800,000,000 of Us - WE- People are Powerfull when we say it loud "WE"..will...FUCK....Them. Lets get the fuckers and Destroy them and their 300 years old So Called "Impire" built on lies, srewing common people like WE. 6,800,000,000 people!!!!
Russian Scientist is LIER, I have the same Question: Who Pays Him? How Much M. F**! Few of these ILLuminati, Zionist Free-Masons + world leaders PLAYing with the LIVES of 6,800,000,000 of Us - WE- People are Powerfull when we say it loud "WE"..will...FUCK....Them. Lets get the fuckers and Destroy them and their 300 years old So Called "Impire" built on lies, srewing common people like WE. 6,800,000,000 people!!!!
its no wonder the worlds in this state. when a lowly inbreed uneducated mutant like me can research corobarate and disprove even Emeritus Scientist in 5 mins of utter fraudulant and smoothed lies. when most of the internet denzien cant be bothered or are not even aware of whats happening in the world around them
Global goverment leaders scientists financiers and all associated with this global FRAUD in the next year as AGW is proven a complete lie should be criminalized and executed for war crimes against humanity there are 6,800,000,000 of us people power lets get the fuckers
Criminals rule this world and also all the biggest media. Cant you see that?? The solution of ''global warming'' is to put TAXES ON EVERYTHING THAT PRODUCES CO2!! WHAT!! They will not stop using oil or coal or let us use something else. HELLLO! WAKE UP PEOPLE! THIS IS A MONEY FRAUD FROM HELL.. Check out THE ILLUMINATI agenda...
eh he is telling the truth :) he predicted heatwave in russia, the cold in europe and USA - that guy is spot on. Dont buy into corporate media bs about climate change
Also, the food shortage in Africa, for example, is NOT caused by a lack of radiant energy, at all. It's caused by a lack of rain. But even more significantly, by a set of militarized and/or fascist local governments and the community of 1st world countries being unwilling to help.
Let's consider an analogy, to better understand how dependent and independent variables work. I call relatives more during the holidays, and so I buy more minutes from the phone company in those months. If someone dies or has a birthday, I know exactly how many more I need to buy. However this year, I cancel my internet and refuse to use mail. This is an event which has never happened, meaning I have no empirical data with which to predict it. I don't know how many minutes to buy,
Dr. Who Astrophysicist owned illuminati front World Wildlife Foundation Draago from Russia. Climate Gate is nothing more than a way to control the progress of the worlds energy and keep back the developing nations or "useless eaters" as they like to call us.
Global warming is a load of lies, the English man is very right, I would trust him, the Russian guy looks like he depends on his salary from these climate change people.
Hopefully it all comes out in the wash and the paid for shills (Warmy's) will face criminal charges , thats a long list . "Hang on" there's a desperate homeless polar bear dressed in an Al Gore suit begging for money at my front door ....
To Russia with love! I'm a great fan of your programme it cheers me up everyday to think I exist on a planet of morans. The russian accent is far more hotter than the english accent. The sexed up labour propaganda spin of words last term of elections really is great example of global warming of the mans lack of sexual stamina. He needs some viagra to get him going. The pharm - farm- slip of tongue there. indus-tree- oxygen. Has to look into algae for proof of global warming.
@johnnyshamma - I agree with the charlatans in the scientific community. Because after all they are pulling the strings. I wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of them. I take offence with the word cunt. Being a woman this might be offensive to some women. If you look at your psychology of the undertones of this remark greedy cunts, do you see that you think subconsciously about women as the threat. If you had said bastards or tossers then that might have been a little more accurate.
@Blodwen0404 No..unlike you I speak my words freely and dismiss remarks aimed at making me feel guilty for expressing my freedom of speech, I am not a Politically Correct slave, if I say cunt it is not meant to be offensive to women but if any woman, like Hillary Clinton for example, acts against the good of humanity then yes I will say she is a cunt...and she is...so how I choose and when I choose to use this word is my right as a loving soul, If offended just do not digest the words.
@johnnyshamma - Thanks for getting back to my comment I'm honoured by your honesty and intelligence. Long live freedom of speech.... hopefully without the condemnation and drawing of blood..... I see you have good taste in music.... Howard Jones....... What is love.......... One of my favourites... :-) .... Many issues are there to ponder on though actions speak louder than words... Love to you........
@johnnyshamma If there was ever a false scientist, it's Piers Corbyn. Fortunately, his disinformation is not interfering with the consensus, and we are getting on with the job. Hope you don't end up on the wrong end of history.
@timetochilli Weather forecasting is science, you moron. Science predicts something. Weather forecasting predicts with a moderate accuracy rain, downpour and cloud coverage. A "scientist" with a spreadsheet predicts nothing, I can assure you. Even though I know statistics and regression and simplex.
@timetochilli Nice to see someone from the UK speaking with an American slang, pull your jeans up and be yourself, If you have moved from the U.S I guess...only a guess...that you are not missed.
@CelticReject - Fellow Celt speaking here lets see why you think chap "on top" has suffered a stroke for the 1st minute. I know he sat on his arse & proclaimed his masculine superior authority over the Russian guy below who had a heart attack of emotional response enlarging his ego.
@AbitaVets wow calm down. I am not saying that the global warming or cooling is wrong or anything. I am just saying that the lower in temperature does not prove that global warming is faults. why do you have to get so CAPITALIZED.
I am not saying anyone is right or wrong. I am ONLY saying that people SHOULD NOT just yell at others who have different kinda voice, that UK guy for example.
calm down!!! GEE
what is the point to argue? we all want to protect this world.
@lovepeaceniuniu - I'm on the side of Mother nature... She has a way of speaking in a language that man can't understand - a bit like the relationship of a man & woman.
Kokorin:"malaria never happened in Russia before but now it is"
This is a lie.
Professor Paul Reiter of Institut Pasteur said:
"malaria was once an important cause of morbidity and mortality throughout most of the US and Europe,Nevertheless, the most catastrophic epidemic on record anywhere in the world occurred in the Soviet Union in the 1920s, with a peak incidence of 13 million cases per year, and 600,000 deaths"
"1564-1730 malaria was an important cause of death in several parts of England"
Global Warming is probably a con... but GENOCIDES are committed on a daily basis by Zionist Globalists. The world is becoming a sickening, disgusting place because of the corrupt scumfucks at the very top. The very people that expect US to pay the price for their infinate evil.
@NANDO218 Yeah, but we're talking about the impact of rapidly introducing more carbon dioxide along with other emissions into the Earth's atmosphere. The Sun obviously plays a role in our climate, but it's not driving a car or running a factory. He may be useful for predicting climate based on current weather and solar activity, but he's not qualified to analyze the chemical and thermodynamic effects of the dramatic increase of carbon emissions by Earth's inhabitants.
@JoeJoeTater no he's not but listen to what they say. the russian guy talks about some book that is written by mainstream scientists and calls it the truth. its well known that people are running things behind the scenes for their own agenda. the british guy says that all that is crap and the planet is not really heating up. unless he came out of thin air with that, he must've seen some data showing the opposite. like he asks, who's paying that russian guy?
If his scientific methods for long term forecasting are much more accurate than the computer generated models used by people like the Met Office then this would suggest that he is using variables and parameters in his forecasting which can only produce the correct results as often as he attains them if he has the right formula
& anyway like PC says the more CO2 there is the better crops grow as it acts as accelerator.The more CO2 there is the more crops can grow and so more food
The current hysteria re: global warming BEGAN WITH AL GORE AND HIS POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.
It was shown worldwide in schools (indoctrination?), hotels, movie festivals, later on even regular theatres.
Could it be mass programming? I don't know... Gore himself makes LOTS of money, lives very eco-UN-friendly himself, and has got a rather suspicious background which doesn't make him fit for green politics anyway.
Nevermind the religion that is being established around him and his film, LMAO.
@JSAautomotive...Piers Corbyn is not an idiot....you are the uneducated ass...Piers has studied physics at Imperial College London and went on to study astrophysics (published as an undergraduate, in the Royal Meteorological Society's magazine "Weather" discussing his brine-filled barometer). I'm a qualified geological scientist who has spent a lot of time studying global warming and can tell you, it is physically impossible! what knowledge do you have of climatic systems?....
THANK YOU for being one of those realizing that Corbyn is somewhat valid, unlike most twats that gets to pose as "climate experts" (a term wh ich is used in a very sweeping way these days, thanks to the mainstream media becoming more and more desperate with keeping up the status quo) lol
@aerobique.....in the carboniferous around 75 million years ago carbon levels where 12 times higher than today, but temperature was expected to have been the same if maybe at most 2-3 degrees higher (this has been recorded from geological rock samples). the carbon we burn today was taken out of the atmosphere in carboniferous so how can we possibly change the global temp? EDUCATE YOUR SELF BEFORE EDUCATING OTHERS!!!
@aerobique i dont get it, you just repeated what i said!? r u so dumb you cant come up with your own argument? do you know how a conversation works?.....or r u one of those special cases?....
@aerobique you cant come up with a reasonable argument...if your that passionate about it, go to your basement, take some rope and hang yourself...its the only way to get rid of your carbon foot print...you fucking idiot.
This is like a monty python sketch, rofl.
rivercarper01 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
More evidence/ impacts of climate change news, for those interested..
.
Biggest polluters hold up deal at UN global warming talks
.
China, the U.S. and India, the three biggest polluters, maintained their resistance to a time line leading to a legally-binding climate treaty, threatening efforts to keep up the fight on global warming this year.
.
Bloomberg News
9 December 2011
Nightversionn 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
when alex jones and fox news are saying the same thing what does that tell you? climategate is a cia mossad deception. how obvious does it have to be that the common thread is OIL and imperialism.
why is alex jones against avatar when the movie points directly to 911 truth
climate gate is a cia mossad deception designed to protect the military industrial complex
MrTranscend1 1 month ago
I WATCHED THIS IN SCHOOL. LOOOOOOL
heliman5434 1 month ago
Climategate 2.0 has started TODAY!!! Thousands of emails leaked by a whistleblower and they are JUICY and SPICEY! Marc Morano has some great links to the emails.
nlpjohn 2 months ago
@nlpjohn links?
Strange0ne 2 months ago
@Strange0ne climatedepot com is Morano's website. In the new emails, many alarmist scientists concede that Michael Mann's research is embarassing and they want no part of it. They even admit they went on a campaign to delete McIntyre's comments from realclimate com. And they discuss strategies to avoid FOIA... And lots more. These new emails are more damaging than the first set...
nlpjohn 2 months ago
Hahaha!!! What are you? What are you? Who pays you? Who pays you?!!!! According to the WHO (thats the World health organisation, not The WHO are you? WHO pays you? boom-boom katching!), theres been Malaria throughout Russian history and the last outbreak was just after WW2....
ChrisMeerkat 2 months ago
Hahaha!!! What are you? What are you? Who pays you? Who pays you?!!!!
ChrisMeerkat 2 months ago
Yes, that's right. Ask a weather forecaster. They may as well have asked a lorry driver.
Webofscience 2 months ago
Dmitriyev, Sergey. "Malaria Threat." The Moscow News. 24 Jul 2008.
Diamonddavej 3 months ago
Briffa, K.R., Schweingruber, F.H., Jones, P.D., Osborn, T.J., Shiyatov, S.G. & Vaganov, E.A. 1998. Reduced sensitivity of recent tree-growth to temperature at high northern latitudes. Nature 391(6668), 678-682.
Diamonddavej 3 months ago
The apparent "falling temperatures" are from tree ring proxies only in northern Russia.
Proxies were made by constructing a mathematical relationship between measured temperatures from 13 weather stations and tree ring growth in Russia. Since the 1960s, rising temperatures in 13 weather stations in Russia no longer reflected by tree rings.
However, the claim that trees in Russia show a cooling trend is based on only 13 weather stations, 6 of which were closed down in 1990!
Diamonddavej 3 months ago
This was a funny debate but the Russian fellow is totally blagging it - even *I* know Russia has Malaria and always has. If he is mistaken/lying here, then what about the Global Warming issue? Pollution IS a problem, no doubt, and needs to be sorted out but Global Warming is a somewhat seperate issue to these "localised" environmental problems. I wonder about the idea of the West trying to hold the rest of the World back, this strikes me as a bit silly but there IS a potential catastrophe there.
andy7666 3 months ago
I bet if we somehow doubled the amount of CO2 in the air, we could probably turn deserts into jungles. Then we could chop them down and turn them into farm land and support 10 times as many people on the planet. So I say LETS PRODUCE MORE CO2 FOR THE GOOD OF HUMANITY!!
Ladykofnyc2 4 months ago
If CO2 was such a problem, why is it that indoor and outdoor garden aficionados use dry ice and CO2 generators to double or triple the amount of CO2 for their plants in order to make them grow bigger? The fact that gardeners do this tells me that there’s probably not enough CO2 in atmosphere for plants to reach their full potential. And any additional CO2 created by our little activities, is quickly being absorbed.
Ladykofnyc2 4 months ago
@Ladykofnyc2 - Protip: Humans are not plants.
Hold your breath f0r a while and see why CO2 is a problem for humans. There's a reason you breathe it OUT instead of breathe it in.
A86 4 months ago
@A86 I think you misunderstood Ladykofnyc2 - she was talking about plants thriving on increased levels of CO2, not humans
CokeSupply 4 months ago
@CokeSupply - She's half right and half wrong. Plants can thrive on it to a degree. After a certain point if plants get too much CO2 they "sweat" less and can eventually succumb to acidosis. Even if they don't make it to the acidosis phase they become less nutritious as they "sweat" less and their acidic and sugar composition changes. Herbivores can start dying out as they can't eat enough plants to sustain themselves. There's a reason why plants from previous eras died out...
A86 4 months ago
@A86 And yet indoor gardeners and industrial indoor framers usually maintain a CO2 concentrate two to five times that in our natural atmosphere throughout the entire lifecycle of their plants with out them "eventually succumbing to acidosis".
Ladykofnyc2 4 months ago
@CokeSupply - The Earth's climate is significantly different today and most plants from back then would not be able to tolerate today's climate (not enough CO2 for them today). If CO2 levels increase too high eventually most modern plants and animals could end up going extinct as we're not adapted for climates from Earth's past.
However, we should be far more worried about dying from extreme weather from greenhouse buildup and the havoc it can wreak on the ecosystem.
A86 4 months ago
@A86 What level of CO2 concentration would be considered "too high" for "most modern plants"?
CokeSupply 4 months ago
@CokeSupply - Much higher than the CO2 concentration now. Above 600-700 ppm. At the current rate of pollution it would take more than a century to reach that concentration, unless our pollution rates increase and/or deforestation increases faster (which it very well could, unfortunately).
The more immediate danger is flooding due to polar ice caps melting from the excess heat and the excess heat affecting pressure cells and causing more intense storms across the planet.
A86 4 months ago
@A86 Hmm that's interesting... because there's videos on YouTube of plants growing in 1200ppm and they are thriving and growing larger and heavier and producing more fruit. I will find one and put it on my channel homepage for you to see :)
What's a "pressure cell"? I've never heard that phrase before
CokeSupply 4 months ago
@CokeSupply - It depends on the type of plant. Some plants can grow well at that CO2 concentration (particularly more ancient plants) and some turn yellow instead of green at that concentration.
That concentration would make humans and many animals sick over a prolonged period though. Being exposed to that much CO2 for months and years on end would make humans have a headache and increase carbon sicknesses. The Earth would be several degrees warmer and the ocean level hundreds of feet higher.
A86 4 months ago
@A86 What's a "pressure cell"? And where did you read about people getting sickness from breathing 1200ppm carbon dioxide?
CokeSupply 4 months ago
@CokeSupply - I was referring to weather, weather has cells.
"where did you read...getting sickness from breathing 1200ppm carbon dioxide"
Sorry, but this just lets me know you have little knowledge about this subject:
en (.) wikipedia (.) org / wiki/ Carbon _ dioxide # Toxicity
There's a reason you breathe OUT carbon dioxide instead of in. There's a reason why spacecraft and submarines have CO2 scrubbers and why your mother would sometimes suggest you go outside and get fresh air.
A86 4 months ago
@A86 And where did you read that the ocean will rise "hundreds" of feet? Water takes up LESS space than ice
CokeSupply 4 months ago
@CokeSupply - "Water takes up LESS space than ice"
Ice FLOATS in water. If the polar ice caps melt the extra water flows into the oceans. It wasn't there before because it was floating as a solid:
science (.) howstuffworks (.) com / environmental / earth / geophysics / question473 (.) htm
Put some ice cubes in a cup of water. Let it melt. You'll notice the water level rises when the ice cubes melt.
A86 4 months ago
@A86 Cool, then when summer ends, the ice caps begin to solidify again, like they always do.
richiemagnet90210 1 month ago
@richiemagnet90210 - No one said they don't or won't. The fact you even said that shows you truly do not understand this scientific issue.
The problem is that less and less of the water re-solidifies into ice because it's too warm for more of it to freeze. More water freezes the colder it is (sea salinity causes some water to be effectively "supercooled").
A86 1 month ago
@CokeSupply - From the site, "If all of the Antarctic ice melted, sea levels around the world would rise about 61 meters (200 feet)"
If the ocean levels rose 200 feet cities like New York City, New Orleans, Tokyo, Boston, etc. would be underwater.
A86 4 months ago
@A86
What happens during photosynthesis, genius?
Ladykofnyc2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ladykofnyc2 - "What happens during photosynthesis"
I'm quite sure you don't know but part of the photosynthesis process involves plants perspiring:
(.) scidev (.) net / en/ news / global - warming - makes - plants - sweat - less - 1 (.) html
Gardeners keep the CO2 concentrate in greenhouses between 400 to 550 ppm.
Try reading science before making an ass of yourself.
A86 4 months ago 2
I like the headline:
"Leaked files reveal low standards in climate change moral high ground" LOL!!
Why is it that we have to turn to Russian T.V. for the truth? How the hell did that happen?
Ladykofnyc2 4 months ago
Dude top right looks dead.
acepowers 4 months ago
"Increase in hurricanes in the USA in the last 100 years?".... Until now... Hurricanes in Boston and New York are not normal. And 2011 is the most expensive year in terms of natural disasters (already)..
7wrmv 4 months ago
9:15 "10.000.000 malaria cases in Russia" New York Times, February 20, 1921
Priceless.
joakeimmcgrath 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"UFO Disclosure A Global Deception Conspiracy " On YOUTUBE is a
compilation of evidence revealed by former military personnel,
astronauts, politicians & American presidents. This contains credible
aired UFO news footage. The compilation contains knowledge of life
beyond Earth + the current ongoing presence and initiated contact
which has being hidden from the public for over 50 years + more.
Freedomloveandtruth 5 months ago
The call from hundreds of scientist from all over the globe to stop the increase in CO2
concentration in the atmosphere was the result of overwhelming evidence. Science is based on evidence not rhetoric. The Russian scientist is therefore correct!
blanketofpurple 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All around the world governments are imposing a carbon tax. But Star Scientific's Muon Catalysed Fusion produces NO CO2 so therefore NO CARBON TAX. Also NO Nuclear Fission waste, it is completely safe, NO Fukushima here.
If you care about the cost of your energy you will want this: "..could cost as little as 0.9c per kilowatt" see blog "The Big Picture by Andrew Horvath" July 01 post
website "Star Scientific Limited"
2110kop 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OK, climate sceptics: here's the raw data you wanted
' dispel the myths that the data has been inappropriately manipulated, and that we are being secretive," says the university's pro-vice-chancellor for research. "Some sceptics argue we must have something to hide... released the data to pull the rug out from those who say there isn't evidence that the global temperature is increasing'
w w w.newscientist.c o m/article/dn20739-ok-climate-sceptics-heres-the-raw-data-you-wanted.html
blackadderthe4 6 months ago
Comment removed
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
I get my weather information from chicken little. Far less allarmist than the Global Warming religion advocates.
ChrisPCrunchy 6 months ago
9:14 and on is HILARIOUS
Vote - Best news station
Rememberthename8 6 months ago
Nothing like a bit of science-bashing from RT
TheGamanic 6 months ago
Five independent inquiries cleared the scientists involved of any wrongdoing. Sadly, these findings were hardly reported at all in comparison to the original scandal. Consequently many, including me, thought something sneaky had gone on. Today I actually went and checked for myself. I was wrong.
The short version is that phrases taken out of context looked damning. If you read the sentences the phrases came from, and take the time to find out what their terms mean, the scandal disappears.
toomuchluggage 6 months ago 2
HAARP helps selling the climate change to the sheeple.....
joggler66 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The claim of greenhouse gas theory as the cause of global warming is a fraud created to make huge amount of money. The Powers That Be are the ones behind this fraud and also many other problems.
Check out my website which can be accessed through my channel for a big picture of what is going on in the world.
NewAgeofAquarius 7 months ago
It's not easy to catch a scientist lying because they possess expert knowledge. In the rare case they are caught out jump on it! This is bad scientists giving bad advice to our politicians, look at the de-sal plant being built at Wonthaggi that's going to cause Melbourne to pay five times as much for water! Wake up to these snake-oil salesman they're about to fleece you!!!!
SIM2402 7 months ago
this is so daft you got a news anchor that is bias towards global warming you got a greenpeace globalwarming CO2 junkie going all out with the lies and the weatherman is the joke making it that global warming is fact anything else is lies yes if you talk about global warming at work or with friends and you say to them "I dont believe humans can contribute so much to globalwarming in the last 150 years or so they look at you as if you are crazy or you just one of those conspiracy people.
Znaz21 8 months ago
Listen to 6:55 onwards. He is 100% correct
TheBelligerentPanda 8 months ago
Whenever a scientist says something you should look at 2 things. First is the actual facts presented, of course. But second, is who is paying this guy. It is in governments interest to increase their power, and for the people to willingly go along with it.
dyne313 8 months ago
Mars is also undergoing climate change. I don't see too many people driving 4X4's there or any industrial activity for that matter :D Who would think climate change is due to the sun lol. They even changed the name from global warming to climate change due to the fact the earth is actually cooler now than in times when humans had no industry or technology.
galaxything 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the REASON it is impossible to argue AGIANST global warming, is because EVERYONE that believes it, knows nothing more than: a bunch of scientists believe it and they say it is proven.(then the scientists present a graph with an upward line.)
I believed in global warming 110%. i thought i had it all figured out. oil companies deny global warming cause its bad for business.
I WAS WRONG! as i researched global warming in detail, it made me sick how biased i could be.
PLEASE, do better research.
Bullpuma 8 months ago
Well obviously nuclear power is the answer. No CO2 emissions and just look at the impeccable safety record!
Truther858 9 months ago
Carbon dioxide is a toxic and poisonous gas right?
id love to go along with this global dictatorship to prevent this horrid gas from reeking havoc with our atmosphere.
shesh im so glad -they- are taking care of it- id hate for some type of toxin or poison to end up in my; food, water, air, or vaccines ^_^
...oh wait -.-'
on second thought... KILL THE FUCKERS!
UrSoMeanBoss 9 months ago
@UrSoMeanBoss Get help mate - the science is clear. You don't know better than the experts.
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob global warming is a hoax you idiot. look into it, and yes- i know better then the "experts" because the majority of them are lying idiots.
UrSoMeanBoss 9 months ago
@UrSoMeanBoss Actually global warming is a very strong scientific consensus - try reading science rather than blogs (either that or stop using computers - they rely on science, along with medicine, transport...).
You don't know better than the experts, and I hope it's not long before you start being part of the solution.
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob thumbed up to make yo feel better- because the temperature has actually been dropping since 2001~, and why is the surface temperature of other planets heating when the earth was also heating and they were blaming CO2? why does CO2 FOLLOW (not lead before) temperature rise?
do please answer, because even Einstein would be interested how my car's CO2 is reaching mars..
also its snowing where i am :P odd for the month.
UrSoMeanBoss 9 months ago
@UrSoMeanBoss The trouble with your arguments is that none of them (apart from the snow where you are - local weather, not particularly relevant) have survived the scientific process, and have thereby not made a dint in the overwhelming consensus amongst climatologists. Unless you can cite scientific publications where these points are supported with evidence?
topologyrob 9 months ago
@UrSoMeanBoss what "science" is hiding is that the solar cycles since around 1940 have been the highest in recorded history, and while they had tapered off since their highest, they are still higher until 2000 than the mean average throughout history. Thus it is a fallacy to assume as they often do that the earth should have dipped into a near immediate cooling cycle around 1980. Sun output was still higher than normal. AND the increased output saw massive melting of polar ice releasing methane.
batvette 9 months ago
@batvette yep =)
"i know whats wrong with their theories, and Climate change is real- they just seem to keep forgetting about the giant ball of nuclear fire in the sky, and instead they focus on the flames in your engine" -me.
UrSoMeanBoss 9 months ago
@topologyrob concensus, huh? How many people make a career of something they believe is a hoax?
So why should we fall at the feet of scientists who pursue their preexisting beliefs as if it's a religion? They have NO objectivity on the matter, and the day a group of "climate change researchers" publish a paper declaring it's not a problem, the next they will be cleaning out their desks looking for a new job.
God you people are suckers. If it's been warming it's solar variation.
batvette 9 months ago
@batvette It's a consensus of evidence. No beliefs are required.
I think you could do with some genuine scepticism. Where is the evidence for your claims? Reliable, reproducible evidence?
If a scientific paper demonstrated solid evidence that human-induced climate change was not a problem, a Nobel prize would be the very likely result. Not being sacked.
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob "If a scientific paper demonstrated solid evidence that human-induced climate change was not a problem"
Who would produce such a paper and why since it ends their career?
Who pursues a career studying something they don't believe in?
Why do you assume "science" does not have potential for flaws based upon human bias?
What has been the result of Kyoto? Did you know global GGE has risen dramatically in the years since its inception?
batvette 9 months ago
@batvette It would not end their career. It's just that no one has been able to provide evidence. If they did, they'd be a hero in science. Scientists change their minds all the time when the evidence changes - that's what science is. It's true that emissions have risen since Kyoto. Some of this is because China and India are lifting their people out of poverty, with plans to peak in 2020. China's also investing heavily in alternative energies for the future. Your point?
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob It wouldn't end their career? SURE. Governments and institutions would continue to fund them with grants indefinately to study something they just disproved!
Oh, and China and India are lifting their people out of poverty! Of course they are, it's called INDUSTRIALIZATION.
Now what did they say causes global warming? Human Industrial Activity. To fix it, they sell us a plan which results in the industrialization of hundreds of millions of 3rd world people. Questions?
batvette 9 months ago
@batvette I am very sceptical about your claims that evidence produced to change the consensus on anthropogenic climate change would not be lauded by the scientific community. Produce some evidence or pipe down.
What would be your solution to rapidly solve poverty in China? Would you deny Chinese people the right to prosper? The fossil-fuel solution is temporary.
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob "Pipe down"? Excuse me?
How many climate change scientists are there who pursued this as a career but thought from the beginning that it wasn't happening?
And I'm sorry but wasn't Kyoto all about addressing global warming? What are you doing talking about solving poverty or making people prosper in China? I'll tell you why: You like many liberal environmentalism as religion ideologues also have global socialist agenda, and feel self loathing for being born in a "have" ctd
batvette 9 months ago
@topologyrob nation- as well as hate the environmental damage due to prosperity and consumption. So like Kyoto's architects your agenda is to restrain the industrialized nations as much as possible, transfer their wealth to third world nations, and turn a complete blind eye to blatant environmental abuses by their corrupt governments and offer our corporations incentives to help industrialize people who would not have been. The two agendas are contradictory, and you don't see that.
batvette 9 months ago
@topologyrob Catholic Priests are experts on God and the Bible. But would you go to a church and rely on them for an objective view on the existence of God? Stop hiding behind a false authority with "science". These researchers pursued this like it was a religion all their careers, dissenters never made a career of it. Climategate merely showed the fascist nature of their "science".
batvette 9 months ago
@batvette Your comparison is unpersuasive as Catholicism is not based on evidence, but faith. Science deals in evidence. What evidence do you have that Climategate shows anything "fascist" about science?
With such an attitude towards science, don't you worry when you use a computer?
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob LOL, promoting "science" as pure, as if it cannot be severely tainted by the humans engaged in it.
Climategate showed they kept info away from skeptical review, sought to marginalize any dissenters, conspired to rig the peer review process. Didn't you know?
batvette 9 months ago
@batvette Climategate showed none of those things. The propaganda tried to say that, but the evidence is not there. Only lots of cherrypicking and misrepresentation, as several independent inquiries have shown so clearly. Even those are disputed by the desperate believers of propaganda. Where are the real sceptics?
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob Your ignorance of the facts on that is not a credible position.
Emails showed they conspired to marginalize staff of a peer review publication for potential for dissent. Emails showed they withheld data from other scientists who were seeking to replicate their results because they expected skepticism. Inquiries showed no CRIMINAL behaviour but if there was nothing to it we wouldn't be discussing it.
batvette 9 months ago
@batvette I am vastly sceptical about the claims made about "climategate" by right-wing propagandists. They have spread misinformation, out-of-context nonsense, and confusion. the only reason we're discussing it is because the media made such a mess by believing the shysters that a lot of people seem to think the stolen emails have some negative effect on the science. They make no difference in the slightest to the validity of the science. Don't be so gullible.
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob Andrew Manning: (I'm
in the process of trying to persuade Siemens Corp. (a company with half a million
employees in 190 countries!) to donate me a little cash to do some CO2 measurments here
in the UK - looking promising, so the last thing I need is news articles calling into
question (again) observed temperature increases -
batvette 9 months ago
@batvette Interesting anecdote. SFA to have with the actual science. Some bloke's lighthearted banter most likely.
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob no it shows he conspired with his peers to ensure news reporters would not have access to information which, if reported, could harm his chances to get that siemens grant.
batvette 9 months ago
@batvette It has no effect on the evidence whatsoever.
topologyrob 9 months ago
@topologyrob You're standing behind this "evidence" as pure scientific fact as if it were produced with objectivity and following the scientific method. The emails contain numerous examples of these researchers willfully tainting that scientific method by obstructing other reseachers from duplicating their results, rigging the peer review process, etc.
I'm sorry that the concept of manipulating statistics to gain results favorable to an agenda is so foreign to you.
batvette 9 months ago
@topologyrob The scientific method involves repeatability and peer review.
The emails repeatedly display examples of the CRU witholding data from outside review . CRU director Phil Jones told Australian scientist Warwick Hughes in a 2005 email: "Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it."
batvette 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@batvette It shows understandable annoyance at repeated, sustained harassment (from people like the serial liar Steve McIntyre)
topologyrob 9 months ago
@MikeFromTheUK1 but, how would independent scientists benefit from carbon taxes? I mean honestly, why the hell would carbon taxes make a difference what independent scientist say?
hempartist420 9 months ago
climate change has nothing to do with HUMANS it is global and the sun....so dont tax me for something that has nothing to do with HUMANS......Climate change has to do with the sun and space......what do you think that humans can fix the sun and space really now....tell this people that want to tax the hell out of working people to go and tax there own mothers........
duchesseagle404 10 months ago
I knew it IKNEW it . DAMN !!! thank GOD this man proved this
JohnAntonyFortune 10 months ago
The Russian had his but kicked!
iborrada 10 months ago
Just wanted to say that I checked on the Professor's assertion that malaria had appeared in Russia before and he's correct, it has appeared as far back as 1824, in Siberia, Ukraine and the shores of the Black Sea.
The world has been cooling for the past 7 years. Not saying which direction Mother Nature is gonna go, but it's a fact.
And he's right about the first world wanting to keep the rest of the world behind.
sealbeater 11 months ago 2
So true. There are real "green issues" like pollution, depletion and erosion of soil, pesticides, GMO, resource depletion etc... THe "green" movement has some very corporate mnded membership and AGW is a coporate, for profit, scam.
donttellmethetime 11 months ago
Much respect to Piers Corbyn he tells it how it is the Elites run this world & will contitinue to decieve many & at the same time blame us for current elite masterminded agendas which is all about control he also knows the elite triggered global economy hoax which will make the rich get richer and the poorer worst off people really need to start waking up to this NWO extremism
realtimes1980 11 months ago
CLIMATE CRIMINAL Exxon was caught funding a huge disinformation campaign about global warming. This is one of the reasons so many people don't understand the realities of global warming, or they are complicit or participating in the criminal disinformation scam. Read the report: Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco’s Tactics to Manufacture Uncertainty on Climate Science -- ucsusa . org/publications/catalyst/exxon-exposed . html
gregjalbert 11 months ago
big up Piers!
RankingRobert 11 months ago
They are going to claim they have been spraying berium and it cooled off the planet and saved the day! no one is thinking ahead, they will make this claim, just watch!
1x8twist 11 months ago
No malaria in Russia????
The truth: "In fact, the most catastrophic epidemic on record anywhere in the
world occurred in the Soviet Union in the 1920s, with a peak
incidence
of 13 million cases per year, and 600,000 deaths. Transmission was
high in many parts of Siberia, and there were 30,000 cases and 10,000
deaths due to falciparum infection (the most deadly malaria parasite)
in Archangel, close to the Arctic circle. Malaria persisted in many
parts of Europe until the advent of DDT.
arsjth 11 months ago 4
@arsjth Yep, Russia has plenty of swamps and marsh, its not all frozen tundra as people may expect.
andy7666 3 months ago
3:47 "how do you explain that here i am in moscow and there is no snow when there should be....bla bla bla"
now that they are covered in snow and the USA is covered in it, and despite them saying that future generations might not know what snow is....they claim that its due to climate change.
is there any weather condition that isnt directly linked to climate change? hot, cold, wet, dry its essentially unfalsifiable nonsense.
It is a political ideology foisted on us by the green enviro -nazis
arsjth 11 months ago 21
This has been flagged as spam show
@arsjth,
increasing world population affects resources availability therefore increasing carbon dioxide production, but that has no impact, right?
The scientific community is not to be trusted. They're all biased all around the world except for the small minority who deny the climate change, specially in USA. It's a world-wide conspiracy! I'm sure that emails taken out of context are more important than evidence and the scientific consensus. I guess HIV is a conspiracy too to buy antiretrovirals
cperez1000 4 months ago
One scientist against thousands!!!
One stupid scientist, thousands of well informed scientists.
Those who don't believe climate change is happening should kill themselves - you're a burden on the earth and on human survival.
duncs21 1 year ago
@duncs21 One "stupid scientist" that has ACCURATELY predicted the weather, while all the other one's have been DEAD WRONG.
Maybe 'warmers' should kill themselves since they are so scared of CO2, you could help by not breathing anymore. Dipshit.
wReCktangle 1 year ago 3
So do you think we should treat the atmosphere like a giant experiement, which can't be changed if things go bad.
Do you think that if we continue to spew out CO2 and CH4 at an increasing rate then nothing will happen.
P.S I have a science degree and you obviously don't so you better provide some good evidence if you me to debate you.
beorhav 11 months ago
So he gets someone from Russia barely coherent in English to present the pro-climate change view and a "weather forecast" to speak against. Who would you believe?-a Russian, probably former Communist, or you friendly English weather forecaster?
nsecchi 1 year ago
Relax people. AGW isn't a hoax and there's no conspiracy, but it has indeed been overly politicized. Climatology needs higher standards of validation so that we can make good public policy decisions. If you'll excuse me, I have a general circulation model to compute.
GorterPoss 1 year ago
Ah geez... I feel ashamed to be Russian :(... That Russian guy here is just dumb, can't find any other word to describe him :/...
Spetsop 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Russian Scientist is LIER, I have the same Question: Who Pays Him? How Much M. F**! Few of these ILLuminati, Zionist Free-Masons + world leaders PLAYing with the LIVES of 6,800,000,000 of Us - WE- People are Powerfull when we say it loud "WE"..will...FUCK....Them. Lets get the fuckers and Destroy them and their 300 years old So Called "Impire" built on lies, srewing common people like WE. 6,800,000,000 people!!!!
neobulletproof 1 year ago
Russian Scientist is LIER, I have the same Question: Who Pays Him? How Much M. F**! Few of these ILLuminati, Zionist Free-Masons + world leaders PLAYing with the LIVES of 6,800,000,000 of Us - WE- People are Powerfull when we say it loud "WE"..will...FUCK....Them. Lets get the fuckers and Destroy them and their 300 years old So Called "Impire" built on lies, srewing common people like WE. 6,800,000,000 people!!!!
neobulletproof 1 year ago
@neobulletproof I mean, it is written there. WWF. Research about the history of that organization...
Shamanlame 1 year ago
I wouldnt trust anyone who represents Prince Phillips WWF world wildlife fund because philly is behind the global warming scam.
ilovemymum777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shit im on one :)
asifmatey123 1 year ago
shit im on on :)
asifmatey123 1 year ago
its no wonder the worlds in this state. when a lowly inbreed uneducated mutant like me can research corobarate and disprove even Emeritus Scientist in 5 mins of utter fraudulant and smoothed lies. when most of the internet denzien cant be bothered or are not even aware of whats happening in the world around them
asifmatey123 1 year ago
for those interested world wide web iceagenow dot c o m
asifmatey123 1 year ago
Global goverment leaders scientists financiers and all associated with this global FRAUD in the next year as AGW is proven a complete lie should be criminalized and executed for war crimes against humanity there are 6,800,000,000 of us people power lets get the fuckers
asifmatey123 1 year ago
world wide web who.int/library/collections/historical/en/index4.html
malaria in russia
that puts tthe russian scientist into the lying cataogory
asifmatey123 1 year ago
Criminals rule this world and also all the biggest media. Cant you see that?? The solution of ''global warming'' is to put TAXES ON EVERYTHING THAT PRODUCES CO2!! WHAT!! They will not stop using oil or coal or let us use something else. HELLLO! WAKE UP PEOPLE! THIS IS A MONEY FRAUD FROM HELL.. Check out THE ILLUMINATI agenda...
hestur01 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHO PAYS YOU? 10:08
mark32811 1 year ago
wtf is up with the guy in the upper right corner :-S
hellokitty122304 1 year ago
@hellokitty122304
eh he is telling the truth :) he predicted heatwave in russia, the cold in europe and USA - that guy is spot on. Dont buy into corporate media bs about climate change
Hahnsolo07 1 year ago
@freddie15uk
Also, the food shortage in Africa, for example, is NOT caused by a lack of radiant energy, at all. It's caused by a lack of rain. But even more significantly, by a set of militarized and/or fascist local governments and the community of 1st world countries being unwilling to help.
JoeJoeTater 1 year ago 2
@freddie15uk
Let's consider an analogy, to better understand how dependent and independent variables work. I call relatives more during the holidays, and so I buy more minutes from the phone company in those months. If someone dies or has a birthday, I know exactly how many more I need to buy. However this year, I cancel my internet and refuse to use mail. This is an event which has never happened, meaning I have no empirical data with which to predict it. I don't know how many minutes to buy,
JoeJoeTater 1 year ago
Dr. Who Astrophysicist owned illuminati front World Wildlife Foundation Draago from Russia. Climate Gate is nothing more than a way to control the progress of the worlds energy and keep back the developing nations or "useless eaters" as they like to call us.
paralentor 1 year ago 2
totally biased ignorant journalist. Prime example of puppet journalism..
TheInfoStorm 1 year ago
Global warming is a load of lies, the English man is very right, I would trust him, the Russian guy looks like he depends on his salary from these climate change people.
jjtruman 1 year ago 3
Hopefully it all comes out in the wash and the paid for shills (Warmy's) will face criminal charges , thats a long list . "Hang on" there's a desperate homeless polar bear dressed in an Al Gore suit begging for money at my front door ....
stoptheshearing 1 year ago
To Russia with love! I'm a great fan of your programme it cheers me up everyday to think I exist on a planet of morans. The russian accent is far more hotter than the english accent. The sexed up labour propaganda spin of words last term of elections really is great example of global warming of the mans lack of sexual stamina. He needs some viagra to get him going. The pharm - farm- slip of tongue there. indus-tree- oxygen. Has to look into algae for proof of global warming.
Blodwen0404 1 year ago
Piers Corbyn I salute you sir, the sooner these false scientists are revealed as the liars and greedy cunts they are...the better, follow the money.
johnnyshamma 1 year ago 32
@johnnyshamma - I agree with the charlatans in the scientific community. Because after all they are pulling the strings. I wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of them. I take offence with the word cunt. Being a woman this might be offensive to some women. If you look at your psychology of the undertones of this remark greedy cunts, do you see that you think subconsciously about women as the threat. If you had said bastards or tossers then that might have been a little more accurate.
Blodwen0404 1 year ago
@Blodwen0404 No..unlike you I speak my words freely and dismiss remarks aimed at making me feel guilty for expressing my freedom of speech, I am not a Politically Correct slave, if I say cunt it is not meant to be offensive to women but if any woman, like Hillary Clinton for example, acts against the good of humanity then yes I will say she is a cunt...and she is...so how I choose and when I choose to use this word is my right as a loving soul, If offended just do not digest the words.
johnnyshamma 11 months ago
@johnnyshamma - Thanks for getting back to my comment I'm honoured by your honesty and intelligence. Long live freedom of speech.... hopefully without the condemnation and drawing of blood..... I see you have good taste in music.... Howard Jones....... What is love.......... One of my favourites... :-) .... Many issues are there to ponder on though actions speak louder than words... Love to you........
Blodwen0404 11 months ago
@Blodwen0404 You are most welcome and I thank you from my soul, may you always be surrounded by protective love.Peace.
johnnyshamma 11 months ago
@johnnyshamma I like what you said and that is so true.
karr1111 11 months ago
@johnnyshamma If there was ever a false scientist, it's Piers Corbyn. Fortunately, his disinformation is not interfering with the consensus, and we are getting on with the job. Hope you don't end up on the wrong end of history.
topologyrob 9 months ago
@johnnyshamma u dumbass that guy is a weather forecaster not a scientist lol
timetochilli 8 months ago
@timetochilli Weather forecasting is science, you moron. Science predicts something. Weather forecasting predicts with a moderate accuracy rain, downpour and cloud coverage. A "scientist" with a spreadsheet predicts nothing, I can assure you. Even though I know statistics and regression and simplex.
Racronus 8 months ago
@timetochilli Nice to see someone from the UK speaking with an American slang, pull your jeans up and be yourself, If you have moved from the U.S I guess...only a guess...that you are not missed.
johnnyshamma 8 months ago
I really shouldn't laugh but it looks as though the chap on the top has suffered a stroke for the 1st minute.
CelticReject 1 year ago
@CelticReject holy shit! it really does look like he's having a stroke lol.
ramp2tramp 1 year ago
@CelticReject - Fellow Celt speaking here lets see why you think chap "on top" has suffered a stroke for the 1st minute. I know he sat on his arse & proclaimed his masculine superior authority over the Russian guy below who had a heart attack of emotional response enlarging his ego.
Blodwen0404 1 year ago
people, go study science. global warming's effect actually cause the globe to cool.
that weather man is so unreasonable anyway. why would you people listen to him?!
he does not even make sense.
lovepeaceniuniu 1 year ago
@lovepeaceniuniu
GEE, THE SUN COOLING HAS NO EFFECT ON WORLD CLIMATE?
TRY TURNING DOW THE HEAT IN YOUR HOME.... THEN SPEAK OF HOME WARMING.
YOU LOGIC STATES THE LOWER YOU SET THE THERMOSTAT THE WARMER YOU WILL BE.
GOOD LUCK.....FOOL
THE U.K. METRO PREDICTED A WARM WET WINTER, PIERS CLEARLY STATED A TRAGIC WINTER WOULD COME.
WHO WAS RIGHT?..
AbitaVets 1 year ago 2
@AbitaVets wow calm down. I am not saying that the global warming or cooling is wrong or anything. I am just saying that the lower in temperature does not prove that global warming is faults. why do you have to get so CAPITALIZED.
I am not saying anyone is right or wrong. I am ONLY saying that people SHOULD NOT just yell at others who have different kinda voice, that UK guy for example.
calm down!!! GEE
what is the point to argue? we all want to protect this world.
lovepeaceniuniu 1 year ago
@lovepeaceniuniu @lovepeaceniuniu why do you have to get so CAPITALIZED
AS WITH YOUR COMMENT, I NORMALLY COMMENT ON SPECIFIC POINTS WITHIN POSTS.
IT DIFFERENTIATES MY IDEAS ROM THE IDEAS OF OTHERS.
I am not saying anyone is right or wrong
BUT SOME ONE IS RIGHT, AND AT LEAST ONE MUST BE WRONG.
I JUST HAVE NOT BEEN IMPRESSED WITH THE WAY IN WHICH CLEARLY WRONG FORECASTS ARE SWEPT UNDER THE POLITICAL/MEDIA RUG
AND I HAD ASKED A SIMPLE QUESTION
REFER TO MY POST AND ANSWER PLEASE.
AbitaVets 1 year ago
@lovepeaceniuniu Global warming comes with a large measure of Local cooling.
GRO5002 1 year ago
@GRO5002 exactly.
lovepeaceniuniu 1 year ago
@lovepeaceniuniu - I'm on the side of Mother nature... She has a way of speaking in a language that man can't understand - a bit like the relationship of a man & woman.
Blodwen0404 1 year ago
Screw the Carbon Tax!!!
Screw the NWO
Screw u capitalists!!
hatton1985 1 year ago
Dear Mr. Kokorin! Please do not read only the propaganda by the IPCC.
In fact, there was malaria in Russia before DDT!
johnDoeABCDXY 1 year ago
Nice one, Piers Corbyn - keep up the excellent work exposing these charlatans.
Bzakey3 1 year ago
Kokorin:"malaria never happened in Russia before but now it is"
This is a lie.
Professor Paul Reiter of Institut Pasteur said:
"malaria was once an important cause of morbidity and mortality throughout most of the US and Europe,Nevertheless, the most catastrophic epidemic on record anywhere in the world occurred in the Soviet Union in the 1920s, with a peak incidence of 13 million cases per year, and 600,000 deaths"
"1564-1730 malaria was an important cause of death in several parts of England"
freddie15uk 1 year ago 3
Global Warming is probably a con... but GENOCIDES are committed on a daily basis by Zionist Globalists. The world is becoming a sickening, disgusting place because of the corrupt scumfucks at the very top. The very people that expect US to pay the price for their infinate evil.
valkier 1 year ago
@valkier
spot on
asifmatey123 1 year ago
How is an astrophysicist qualified to asses a problem in which the independent variable is something happening on earth rather than in the sun?
JoeJoeTater 1 year ago
@JoeJoeTater the sun has a lot to do with what goes on here on earth. look up the effects of sunspots on earth.
NANDO218 1 year ago
@NANDO218 Yeah, but we're talking about the impact of rapidly introducing more carbon dioxide along with other emissions into the Earth's atmosphere. The Sun obviously plays a role in our climate, but it's not driving a car or running a factory. He may be useful for predicting climate based on current weather and solar activity, but he's not qualified to analyze the chemical and thermodynamic effects of the dramatic increase of carbon emissions by Earth's inhabitants.
JoeJoeTater 1 year ago
@JoeJoeTater no he's not but listen to what they say. the russian guy talks about some book that is written by mainstream scientists and calls it the truth. its well known that people are running things behind the scenes for their own agenda. the british guy says that all that is crap and the planet is not really heating up. unless he came out of thin air with that, he must've seen some data showing the opposite. like he asks, who's paying that russian guy?
NANDO218 1 year ago
@JoeJoeTater
If his scientific methods for long term forecasting are much more accurate than the computer generated models used by people like the Met Office then this would suggest that he is using variables and parameters in his forecasting which can only produce the correct results as often as he attains them if he has the right formula
& anyway like PC says the more CO2 there is the better crops grow as it acts as accelerator.The more CO2 there is the more crops can grow and so more food
freddie15uk 1 year ago
Wow this is such a joke.
blambowl 1 year ago
The current hysteria re: global warming BEGAN WITH AL GORE AND HIS POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.
It was shown worldwide in schools (indoctrination?), hotels, movie festivals, later on even regular theatres.
Could it be mass programming? I don't know... Gore himself makes LOTS of money, lives very eco-UN-friendly himself, and has got a rather suspicious background which doesn't make him fit for green politics anyway.
Nevermind the religion that is being established around him and his film, LMAO.
Guitarscreech06 1 year ago 2
and the word "trick" in the context of the emails had nothing to do with cheating lol...
Darusdei 1 year ago
They got a weather forecaster instead of a real climate scientist. This Piers Corbyn is an idiot.
JSAautomotive 1 year ago
@JSAautomotive...Piers Corbyn is not an idiot....you are the uneducated ass...Piers has studied physics at Imperial College London and went on to study astrophysics (published as an undergraduate, in the Royal Meteorological Society's magazine "Weather" discussing his brine-filled barometer). I'm a qualified geological scientist who has spent a lot of time studying global warming and can tell you, it is physically impossible! what knowledge do you have of climatic systems?....
0pocketpenis0 1 year ago
@0pocketpenis0
THANK YOU for being one of those realizing that Corbyn is somewhat valid, unlike most twats that gets to pose as "climate experts" (a term wh ich is used in a very sweeping way these days, thanks to the mainstream media becoming more and more desperate with keeping up the status quo) lol
Guitarscreech06 1 year ago
epic fail!!
shaneclone15 1 year ago
50-90 MILLION TONS of CO2 every 24 hours now
the trends are ALL increasing and that undeniable clear
climate . nasa . go v / keyIndicators /
aerobique 1 year ago
@aerobique.....in the carboniferous around 75 million years ago carbon levels where 12 times higher than today, but temperature was expected to have been the same if maybe at most 2-3 degrees higher (this has been recorded from geological rock samples). the carbon we burn today was taken out of the atmosphere in carboniferous so how can we possibly change the global temp? EDUCATE YOUR SELF BEFORE EDUCATING OTHERS!!!
0pocketpenis0 1 year ago
@0pocketpenis0
"EDUCATE YOUR SELF BEFORE EDUCATING OTHERS!!! "
muhaha! "burn the witches!"
aerobique 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aerobique i dont get it, you just repeated what i said!? r u so dumb you cant come up with your own argument? do you know how a conversation works?.....or r u one of those special cases?....
0pocketpenis0 1 year ago
@aerobique you cant come up with a reasonable argument...if your that passionate about it, go to your basement, take some rope and hang yourself...its the only way to get rid of your carbon foot print...you fucking idiot.
0pocketpenis0 1 year ago