Added: 5 years ago
From: oystalme
Views: 4,301
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 中共集團經常杜撰謊言,

    欺騙國際社會

    封鎖YouTube欺騙中國人

    封锁消息愚民政策

  • the investment from US government is worthwhile, now you tibetan separatists get TV broadcase, the radio. Impressive, very well organized and trained.

  • 和中国政府作对的广播当然要封掉了,About this video 写的一点政治常识都没有。

    难道台湾可以收到中央人民广播电台?

  • 原来是流亡政府的言论,也是不过一家之词啦。

    不知道这家电台当年有没有详细报道过奥母真理教造成的日本东京地­铁毒气事件。

  • kken5554: it seems you are awaw from China long time ago and you do not know what China is happening today. The economical and social changes is so fast which is beyong most westner's imagination. Please visit china and post your ocmments when you come back....

  • 中华民族万岁,俩牙山战胡儿咿呀,地动山摇!!!!!!!!!!­!

  • Observechina(摘录): 江澤民等六位中國官員在西班牙高級法院被提起訴訟,罪名是"反人­類罪"和"西藏屠殺"。  中国入侵西藏造成120多万藏民死亡,近6000座寺庙被人民解­放军毁坏,被抓捕关押者达数千人。 "我们都不要忘了中国共产党在历史上杀人最多,汉族、藏族和其他­民族都是受害者。"她总结道。

  • kken5554:

    你條大陸共匪土胞, 好心唔好亂吠, 所有華人俾你班垃圾影衰曬!

    學多兩年中文, 先好學人o地死出來吠好唔好?

  • 普通话都没说好,还反共宣传呢,印度的走狗.阿三走着瞧吧

  • So nobody checked on Tibet for 20 years and they somehow became a country? So they were independent 400 years ago, but 400 years ago most European countries didn't exist or were different, I don't see them going about declaring independence here and there.

    The idea of "Free Tibet" is one of the best examples of western brainwashing, they convinced their citizens to believe in something their own history books contradict.

  • It leave me speechless when I read comment such as jewgnem. I have no idea just because you are lazy or you been brainwashed...you must to know the true history to judge! Do you really think most of brainwash takes place outside the China? Give me a brake.

  • You don't see European nations declaring independence?! Maybe you should check those European history books yourself! In the past 100 years or so nations all over Europe re-achieved independence from foreign regimes. Examples:

    Norway - 1905, succeded from Sweden

    Finland - 1917, succeded from the Russian Empire

    Ireland - 1922, succeded from the United Kingdom

    Iceland - 1944, succeded from Denmark

    Malta - 1964, succeded from the United Kingdom

  • nations that declared independence from the Soviet Union: Bulgaria - 1989 Hungary - 1989 Poland - 1989 Romania - 1989 Belarus - 1990 Ukraine - 1990 Albania - 1991 Armenia - 1991 Azerbaijan - 1991 Estonia - 1991 Latvia - 1991 Lithuania - 1991 Moldova - 1991
  • nations that declared independence from Yugoslavia/Serbia:

    Croatia - 1991

    Macedonia - 1991

    Slovenia - 1991

    Bosnia - 1992

    Montenegro - 2006

    So, looks like Europe has set right it's past mistakes. Maybe its time for China to catch up?

  • china is a republic country, not a union.

    like, you can independence from your family, but you can't let your head independence from your body.

  • haha, how convenient. Unfortunately such pedantic arguments still does not counter the fact that the Tibetans constitute a distinct nation (in the sense of a seperate cultural/linguistic/religious/­ethnic entity) from the rest of that Chinese "republic" that has only recently been subsumed into that "body".

  • china has 54 other "distinct nations" as you said. manchu, mongol, ... and some small ethnic groupe with has less than 10000 peoples

    so, you want china divide to 56 countries?

  • In the fullness of time (it may take centuries), perhaps that will be the best solution for any group that is clearly not at home in your "republic", like the Tibetans or the Uyghurs or many other groups. Although the Mongols of course already have a nation state, so presumably they would simply join their compatriots in Mongolia.

  • And if we are going to descend to such pedantic sophistry, it might be relevent to point out that Yugoslavia described itself as a "republic". And we all know how well that turned out.

  • It's not their first choice to be independence but your NATO launched the war to "free" them, and the f*cking Yankees bombed china's embassy on purpose. So do you respect the human rights?

    Btw, if you like "break up", do it in your lovely UK: England, Scotland, Welsh, especially the N-Ireland. You even do not speak the same language!

  • yes, I fully advocate English, Scottish, and Welsh independence and the break up of the United Kingdom; and I am not alone in this belief - the Scottish National Party was last year elected to power in the Scottish parliament promising a referendum for independence. Northern Ireland is a slightly different issue of course; neither of the two main sides advocate full independence as a solution, although there are a minority who do.

  • ok, looks that you have many thing to do.

    so do hard to break up your UK, and keep the faith with you dream. i'll not blame your UK Gouvernment to stop your dream.

  • I never said it will be easy. But then again, real change seldom is. Like I said with the example of China, it may take centuries. But thankyou for you support ;)

  • the history told us we have do things together to make us stronger, even some dynasties which Han nation groups is not the leader like mongol/YUAN and manchu/QING.

    before reach the Freedom what you said, we want more of Strong and Rich.

  • yes, human beings must recognize their common bonds, but that is *not* the same thing as wanton imperialism and conquering of nations under one flag and ideology. The history of Europe, specifically the colonial period, tells us that that does not work either. We cannot set aside freedom for the immediate gratification of strength and wealth.

  • As for Yugoslavia, I think you should read about the situation in Yugoslava a little better before you blame NATO and the USA. This is hardly the place for such a discussion because it is a very big issue, but suffice it to say that the causes were very much internal and not just NATO launching a war arbitrarily. NATO are not the United States, and Yugoslavia was not Iraq!

  • i blame NATO because US bombed china's embassy with 3 100% accuricy missile and killed 4 people ON PURPOSE!!

    your medias are always blame china's human right but you never respect other people's living rights. that's why i blame you.

  • That was a regretable incident, yes; whether or not it was on purpose or whether those missiles are 100% accurate is debatable, but even in the unlikely event it was I still don't see how it disproves my point about Yugoslavia's breakup. Unless you really believe NATO entered Yugoslavia for the sole reason of bombing the Chinese Embassy?!

  • you can read related topic on globalresearch. it is not a incident, the reason what they said is: they think yugo's leader miloservic was hide in chinese embassy. just for their "THINK", we died 3.

  • I suppose...

    "Tibet: China's Great Wall of Censorship"(in Chinese langage)

    will be OK.

  • Can I copy and re-upload this video with Chinese Title in order to let more Chinese people know about Tibet and their government?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more