Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
in other words, did the SOTU mean anything?
davisfleetwood 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
scary parent companies. too much power for too few people
ohiogrown1 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You rock!
Smokin3215 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Masked Analyst is a hero in the pantheon of Anonymous.
azjeff1971 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thank you for making these videos and doing your part to help get Mark's account re-instated. You are a hero! And you even wear a mask like a super hero!
dedalb 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Even 9000 lawyers could not beat the analysis from the great analyst the user themaskedanalyst
gurutruth 3 years ago
Oops! Sorry gurutruth, I accidentally hit the remove button to your other comment instead of reply! Oops! In any case, I wanted to say thank you for the nice comment. I learned a lot about the DMCA because I was suspended for four months because of a false DMCA. I'm glad that my experience has given me the knowledge to help Mark. Mark is a good man who has an important message. The more people who can hear his voice, the better.
themaskedanalyst 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Again a well done, thoughtful series. 5star
AnonOutreach 3 years ago
Thanks, Youtube can change their rules at the drop of a hat. They are the gods of this site and they can make any decision they want, no matter how capricious and arbitrary it may be. There are no checks and balances. But they do pay for the server, so this is another form of the Golden Rule. He with the gold, rules.
themaskedanalyst 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Agreed.
YT changed their rules due to public pressure, however.
Once a public institution sets a "policy" and "procedure" they are subject to public exposure if they do not *follow* those rules.
YouTube does not have accountable "procedure" to follow their policy. They usually send form emails etc. and do not personally answer anything.
Consequently, the question becomes, "What is the most effective pressure to apply ensuring that YouTube will follow their own policies."
AnonOutreach 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The other factor is that YouTube has changed their own rules.
Since their OWN rules are muting for two weeks now, why not just count Mark's two weeks gone and put him back on? They can back down on the fact that Mark did not receive the original notices.
AnonOutreach 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love your disclaimers. All Hail The EFF! They are the preeminent ass kickers when it comes to freedom of expression on the Net. Everyone interested in these issues should have their site bookmarked.
cehbeach 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I suppose the scilons could have a plant at Viacom. They have many people in entertainment. The timing was curious. Scilons took credit right before it happened.
TheSpiderMind 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow, you are a genius.
If you aren't a lawyer, you should be.
I love the idea about deposing the person at Viacom who sent the DMCA notice, and deposing Youtube to find out who filed the complaint, and whether that person was affiliated with Scientology. It's brilliant.
SP999999 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SP999999 I think it's a good idea too.
AnonOutreach 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Isn't there a way that mark can BUY a distribution license of some kind for the individual clips? If it's anything less than five grand, Anon will likely be able to foot the bill. With so MANY of us, it'd be loose change for each.
Stonehawk 3 years ago