Added: 2 years ago
From: tree0fmight
Views: 1,941
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • IT'S A SHAME THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ALLOW THOSE SHEEP MINDED NAZI TROOPS TO SAY YOU HAVE NO FIRST ADMENDMENT. FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS. VOTE RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012!!

  • @smoke360ful Can't click like enough..

  • fucking hippies -_-

    they can be happy that they were born in america and not in iraq or africa

    BUT NO

    take a taste of tear gass you tree fucking idiot!

  • @123456789Anarchy This is a public service announcement. Would you please go strangle yourself. This has been a public service announcement.

  • @IDontWantYourCereal

    xD wow go hug some trees you damn hippe but plz make it quiet cuz no one cares about you :)

  • God damn hippies.

  • guys our founding fathers gave us the right to bear arms cause they knew that the government would do this to protesters and ppl next time when you protest bring guns

  • @altoids79762 Bad advice. Are you trying to get people killed? Bringing guns is illegal and a perfect excuse for the gov't to declare a state of emergency. It's our right to bare arms but it isn't our right to shoot cops. Peaceful protests are more effective than violence.

  • Comment removed

  • @Undebunked not when they attack us for doing so there comes a time when you have to fight back even if it's with non leathal tazers.That time has come as american police have gone to far they staged event's at g20 summits so they can use harmful force as the lrad can make people deft man & they now that so it's leathal to that degree.Also they intentionally corner people attack them then when that said person fights because they brutally attack him/her they claim they were justified.

  • Dont Take the Swine Flu Shot it has Mercury in it!

  • Why the fuck does that fake president even show up to anything? Putin runs russia like a damn dictator.

  • "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it," Evelyn Beatrice Hall

  • sweet quote!

  • "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

  • *sigh*....Your title is wrong. They are not silencing free speech. These are the ones who were not issued a permit to protest. They were told to move, and they refused. The supreme court ruled that issuing permits to protest is constitutional. So whats the problem here?

  • *sigh* I guess you don't understand Free Speech.

    People shouldn't need a permit to speak freely......

  • Well agrue that with the Supreme Court. They are the ones who ruled it. The City can issue permits to those who protest peacefully. The Anarchists are just nuts....

  • You're double-thinking....

    People do not need Permission to use Free Speech.

  • lol.... the Supreme Court said it is Constitutional to issue permits to protest. This is a protest.....They did not have a permit......They were told to leave......They refused......They were removed...... = ......Perfectly Legal... I dont see how I am double thinking.

  • Are you trying to miss the point?

  • No I understand what your saying....they shouldnt need a permit to protest. What I am saying is.....They have to have a permit in order to protest which is perfectly constitutional. Thats what I am saying.....

  • and that's where you are double-thinking...

  • Ok my fine Socialist friend to the north explain it to me? Where am I wrong? The Supreme Court said issuing permits is constitutional....This group was not issued one, and thats why they were removed. Please.... coming from someone who doesnt even live here....Please explain to me how our laws work?

  • I like how you judged me by my Youtube Location...

    lol you do realize you can set that yourself, right??

    My location in the World doesn't change the facts....

    It isn't Freedom of Speech if you need Permission.

    This is how you're double-thinking: they shouldnt need a permit to protest. What I am saying is.....They have to have a permit in order to protest which is perfectly constitutional.

    How is taking away your First Amendment Constitutional??

  • "they shouldnt need a permit to protest." Where did I say that? The supreme court ruled that it is constitutional to issue permits to people to assemble but can with hold that to groups who are known to cause trouble ie: The Anarchists....Which is ALL they know how to do. No one is taking away their 1st Amendment Right. Also why would you put Canada if you don't live there? ...lol

  • Do you even know what you are typing...?

    that was a direct quote, I copied from you.

    Although you may have deleted it since...

    Which I must say, looks poorly on you, sir.

    They have taken away their First Amendment Right,

    by requiring the need to have permission to use it..

    How is that FACT slipping your grasp??

    Again it doesn't matter where I live, but the facts I state.

  • If i deleted it my name would still be here with "Removed by Author" soooo I didnt remove anything. The law is the law..They made it so groups that are there to only cause trouble could be weeded out, and not violate the rights of the ones who are there to assemble peacefully. You and I both know the history of Anarchists, and you know full well that these guys dressed in all black are Anarchists. They are nothing but trouble makers. How is that fair to everyone elses Rights?

  • google denied protest permits and you will get 3,200,000 hits. They can deny you a permit just because they feel like it and don't have to give a reason. only 2 out of 13 permits were granted. Atlanta denied a tea party protest earlier this year just because they didn't feel like they needed one. Its unconstitutional no matter what the supreme court ruled.

  • Damn Skippy!!

  • regretfully yes it can and does get abused, but imagine the streets of this country if they didnt? We wouldn't have one.... The Nutty fringe ie: Anarchists would have burned everything.

  • They would be just fine. It would be just like it was when we didn't need permits to protest. Look permits don't stop anarchists they will show up werever they want. This only hurts law abiding citizens. We managed just fine in the 70's and protests back then makes the protests of today look like childs play.

  • Well i do have to agree with you now about the protests in the 60's. I understand where you and vera are coming from but the law is the law. Small groups of Anarchists are not going to help change that fact only make people think that its right. I like to consider myself a Gadsden I have the flag outside the house. I consider it more important a symbol of American Liberty, and Freedom than the Countries Flag but I mean seriously.....Anarchists? If we want real change then we need real action.

  • cont....

    ,and not action from a fringe group like anarchists. No one is willing to make the sacrifice for their Rights anymore Im afraid. This country is full of apathetic over weight lazy leeches. That does not include you....Just in case you get offended by that. I guess its easy for me to criticize since Im not in the street with them I guess.

  • @brickly77 no the protests now are fucking stupid, i guarntee 80% of these kids know what their protesting... they don't know shit its actually ridiculous...."this money's should be kept inside the country" ya ok then all the countries that aren't super rich will perish... these kids are talking out of their asses they just wanna start up shit..

  • Not only that but you have to buy insurance in order to obtain a permit and it is actually very expensive.

  • @Dt0x75 the supreme court is full of shit you idiot they work for the elite's not you or the united state's any longer all they care about is protecting the wealthy & their hired police to silence anyone whose oppsed to the new world order/police state which means you have no right's according to them sir.They don't care about our constitution & never did they only played along long enough to get to this point of making us their slave's.If you research the elite you'd know this.I've met them.

  • @bkeener86 besides sitting behind a computer whining about it....How do you expect to change anything? Remember the Pen is Mightier than the Sword.

  • @Dt0x75 i already do but unfortnately i cannot do it myself sir i need you & everyone to help bring true change so that we & our future generations may live free & not live in a world ruled by tyrants.I do my best but there's only so much one man can do.

  • Pitsburg wasn't even going to allow any permits they had to be taken to court just to get permits. What if the Supreme Court ruled against gun ownership. What if the supreme court ruled that the UN constitution over ruled our own. If the supreme court goes against the constitution the law is void.

  • The Supreme Courts duty is to interpret the Constitution to the Law. So I doubt that would ever happen. If they did say the UN Constitution over ruled our own we wouldnt have a Supreme Court any longer would we? Also they weren't going to issue them a permit to use the park not one to protest. Why because the Police are using it so simply put they just couldnt.

  • The people aren't protesting because times are hard; they are protesting Globalism (one World Currency, UN, WHO, WTO having authority OVER soveriegn contries' own laws)

  • Power does not equate to authority. Hitler had power, Einstein had authority, Jesus has power AND authority.

  • They used the Goddamned LRAD sound cannon on the American people.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more