Hidden in Our Inspirations and Hidden all over this planet in the Landscaping- God Hid Watermarks and in them He tells things about the past, present and future. I found them and made videos out of some of them. I found the Garden of Eden and I found what happened right before that and it shows pictures of God in them. Please come look and see something really fascinating. God's real and I can prove it. Please help me share this.
I am barely 18 and I am the only person in my school obsessed with Metaphysics and reading Aristotle and watching these kinds of videos. I LOVE this video.
Also, can't objective experience be the experience of the world through the objective mind? I don't mean the physical organ (the brain) but I mean looking through the mind with an objective point of view?
but at the same time, all of this makes me think about how the indian tribes used all of the animals part respectively and cared about each life they took. They had a respective spiritual way of looking at the lives they took. Did they not have the conciousness to understand this theory? Because, weren't (and aren't--because I'm pretty sure that in some places they still exist) they also people? I respect vegetarianism, but I also really respect this as well. Anyone want to help me out?
Thank you Mr. Campbell for your introduction, but I do have a question. And if anyone else can help me answer this that would be great too. Respectfully I am a vegetarian not only because I follow eastern Philosophy (Buddhism) but also because it helps the environment and because I believe that as a human being, I have the conciousness of empathy and understanding that other things can suffer the same amount of pain as I can. Continued...
All creatures feed on other creatures if u had any basic knowledge of the food chain u would understand that it is neither evil nor non-evil but essential to avoid overpopulation famine disease etc. If u think humans kill in cruel ways, watch a bear rip the head off a salmon. I don't believe to be cruel, just behaving in a manner to optimize survival. A very prominent theory suggests that when humans switched to high protein food sources, the size of our brains expanded dramatically. So u might
What I said is that I have no problem with killing and eating other critters for survival. I am against killing other critters for fun and pleasure -- when survival is not an issue.
@mpspreier Your logic is flawed. The reason many species on this planet give birth to scores of young is to make up for the amount of young that get taken by predators. So, if there weren't so many predators then the amount of young that they give birth to would lessen, resolving the overpopulation problem. We have evolved higher intelligence, and the more intelligence you have, the more you realize that living off other creatures will never bring peace. The future will bring more of this.
Does electron have consciousness ? Molecular biology and molecular evolution Cosmology and cosmic evolution If Universe evolves can electron evolve too? Does evolution of life begin on electron’s level? Origin of life is a result of physical laws that govern Universe. Electron takes important part in this work Question Why does the simplest particle - electron have six formulas: E=h*f, e = +ah*c , e = -ah*c, +E=Mc^2, -E=Mc^2, E= ∞ ? Electron is not as simple as we think
@MatrixReality2011 Sorry I don't understand what you are trying to say to me. How does what you say relate to my comment? Do you mean that we are manipulated into finding it ok to kill for gains? If so then I agree.
If our goal is to lower our entropy, and lower entropy means love, should we all be working towards becoming vegetarian? And will predation, parasitism, and the like, slowly disappear? Because I can't see a system reaching love as long as creatures live off other creatures, since there will always be suffering this way.
@twcjr44 No offense to you Tom, but how can more people like this comment than mine above? It makes no sense to me. "Killing sentient beings unnecessarily is not on the path toward love". So, if there was a shortage of beef and other meat, by your own logic, killing another human would still be on the path toward love because it would be necessary for your survival. I'm sorry, but this logic is just wrong. I'm sure if you were the intended meal, you'd think differently.
@1simonmatthews Does it occur to you that there's a reason for it? If we removed ourselves from the equation, and just watched, what could we learn from the animal's suffering? I don't claim to understand why creature must feed on creature, but I can't imagine that it doesn't affect some sort of balance in the Universe. The natural order of this planet seems like the correct order for the planet, and it would completely change what (for example) a "lion" is if that lion no longer ate meat.
@jigaboon That's your view and your entitled to it. It's pretty much the mainstream view. My view is just more radical. I believe that it must be possible for the universe to evolve to a point where predation is nonexistent, and I'll do my bit to head it in that direction. It doesn't help that man helps save predators from extinction. Maybe they were meant to become extinct. There's less predators now than during the dinosaurs, so the direction is evident. That's my view. You don't have to agree
@1simonmatthews but WHY is it "better" to achieve a point where there are no longer predators? Is it Evil in itself to feed on other creatures, as in the way we were designed? I'm not saying I disagree necessarily, or that I agree, either, I would just like to hear more opinions. Who's to say a perfect system couldn't be achieved on the opposite side of the spectrum, a system where EVERY creature was a predator?
@jigaboon It all depends on what YOU think is evil I suppose. It's subjective. I think it's evil, or wrong at least, to feed on other creatures. You can think what you want, but it'll never change my view. Even if there was a God and he said it wasn't wrong, I'd disagree with him too. If I was in charge I'd design it differently. If a lion ate your child I would think you may see things differently. Or if superior aliens landed and saw us as food. I simply choose to aim for the other spectrum.
@1simonmatthews Humans are designed that way buddy. We may have the option of going vegetarian but we still have the instinct to kill and hunt. and there will always be suffering anyway. Maybe with smaller communities, lower population (Just use condoms people. Look at africa?)
@knifecollector93 Are you saying that humans are a design? If so, who do you think may have designed them? I myself don't have the instinct to kill and hunt, but I do have the instinct to protect the meek from those who do, and dying for that isn't a problem at all for me. I have no fear. How do you know there will always be suffering buddy? "Always" is a long time. Have you projected evolution trillions of years into the future? I like to think more radically. You can do what you want.
You DO have those instincts, You've forgotten how to use them.
A high population will result in suffering. more people -life at a basic level
A low(er?) population - more wealth spread out among the populations, better housing/care/etc.
btw- I'm not sure what you meant with that "I myself don't have the instinct to kill and hunt, but I do have the instinct to protect the meek from those who do" line..I'm a volunteer EMT.
@knifecollector93 How can you say you don't have the answers and then preach facts to me? I haven't forgotten how to use the instinct to kill and hunt, I've made a conscious decision not to and as a result the instinct has gone. Even if I was starving I would not kill to survive, I would allow myself to die. I wouldn't even be tempted. High/low population, yes that's logical. As I said, I'm thinking radically. I think there must be a way for the universe to work without predation. (Continued.)
@knifecollector93 (Cont) There is a fathomless amount of time to achieve this goal, so we might as well try. I'm thinking vastly into the future. I never used to think this way. I used to eat meat. But I believe I'm thinking more clearly now, not less clearly. There is a vast and demonstrable improvement in my academic abilities, which I could go into. So it's logical to conclude that my changed views are a direct result of my improved cognitive abilities. This is what I believe to be the case.
@knifecollector93 About my comment "I myself don't have the instinct to kill and hunt, but I do have the instinct to protect the meek from those who do". It is what it is. Don't try to read anything personal in it. There was nothing personal in it. If you thought that it was directed at you personally then that's an issue that you have with yourself. I was just telling you what my instincts were. It's more about bullying than hunting really - I want to protect the bullied. Nothing aimed at you.
@1simonmatthews I thought it was like that, hard to find any emotion when dealing with this text based stuff. No worries, I've got that same mindset...to a point lol
@1simonmatthews vegetarian would be a good start, but being vegan removes using animals for their resources in any way (as far as possible at least in this society). dont cause harm is the only rule we need. buying products that experiment on animals or still use their resources just not their meat(dairy cows are used for their meat once they dont produce enough milk anyway) is still supporting that industry.
@peoplemadeofcats Agreed. Well I've stopped eating meat after being brought up in a meat-eating family, so it's a step in the right direction. I tried soya milk but it's too vile. I wish I could go all the way but I need milk in my diet. I don't eat much as it is, I'm a naturally thin person. I hope they come up with a more palatable alternative to milk soon. I started writing a veggie/anti-predation speech today. It's radical and will probably attract lots of haters, but what the hey...
Something I've been thinking about. In the double-slit experiment, why doesn't the wave function collapse when we observe it hitting the back screen? And do you think that if someone fired single tennis balls toward two slits inside a sealed chamber of equal proportion, they would behave the same way as single electrons? It's just that we wouldn't be able to know? And what if there were more slits in the chamber? Would the electron go through them all?
It does, yes, yes. To answer these questions in detail and learn more about the double slit experiment google "bottomlayer" by Ross Rhodes -- particularly look at the "Reality Program" -- results are given on last half of chapter two.
@twcjr44 Thanks, I'll take a look at that. What about the first question though? Shouldn't the back screen in the double-slit experiment only show the pattern of hits by a particle instead of showing an interference pattern, because we are observing this too?
The answer to your first question above was: "It does". But it is not measuring descrete particles, only an accumulation of energy as one would expect from a wave. Ross Rhodes will explain the details. at the measurement, that energy is brought into this reality
@UnifiedPerfection Yeah that's weird! Nature seems like some sort of design to me. And if there is one consciousness that creates all the living creatures, then this consciousness seems to be paranoid of itself. Just look at the way people speak to each other on here. Perhaps it's in its youth : )
Questions on Cambell's "Big TOE": According to Cambell, when we die we go to the non-physical reality, where we can choose to "jump right back in" to the physical reality. My question is, if we can choose whatever creature we come back as, who in their right mind would ever choose to come back as something like a rectal worm?
One comes back with a form (species) and condition that optimize the probability of positively evolving one's consciousness. If you are a rectal worm, coming back as a worm is about right for you:-). Actually species with very small decision space have more of a "group soul" rather than an individual soul. Their evolutionary potential is not great enough to warrant individual attention.
@twcjr44 So does this mean "once a worm, always a worm", or can they get gradual promotion, if you like? And also, can you get demoted down the chain if you don't show much potential? I worry about this :)
I like Cambell's "Big TOE", it rings true with me, and thoughts I've had correlate exactly with some of the things he said, but I have questions. How did the system as a whole begin? Where did it come from? Where is the information coming from?
Hello, Thomas Campbell. :) Since I've discovered your videos, I've really been interested in your findings. I tend to be very light on "acquiring" knowledge through books and other's teachings. As much as I can, I try to let my experience dictate who I am, where I am, what I am. **Sigh** I am sure this thought of mine is not an original thought. That thought consists of the FUNDAMENTAL aspect of the universe. That aspect is information exchange. From the sub atomic realm, to you speakin
due to the relative nature of the physical senses and entropy...of said senses due to the laws of physics, all sense perceptions are therefore relative therefore all observation is subjective? Intuition can only hint at a possible objective reality but can't "prove" it. We are an open system according to ilya prigogine's theory of open systems, open means open to new information, which is infinite?
See comment below. Evolving systems are open systems because they are continuingly reinventing themselves as they process experience. Evolution continues as long as there are possibilities to explore -- an open process -- but depending on the degrees of freedom, size, and complexity of the system, it is not necessarily infinite. "Apparently unending" and "no end imaginable" is not the same thing as infinite. One must live with uncertainty -- infinite is an absolute.
@twcjr44 "freedom, size, and complexity of the system, it is not necessarily infinite" if something has a "size" then this is finite, not an open system?
@twcjr44 I disagree again, this negates the origin of metaphysics in the first place, eg Kabbalah has a "process" or "pathway" to the infinite, through the ain, ain soph, ain soph ur, known as the "veil". if it didn't have this in its doctrine then it wouldn't be possible, The ain, ain soph, ain soph ur, translates no thing, no limit, boundless light. This is a veil from the relative to the absolute. many sites seem to invert ain and ain soph ur for some reason....perhaps to obfuscate research?
@twcjr44 Tom, Shamans transcend this veil regularly, so your statement is relative and subjective, that it can "never be obtained". It can be obtained IMO for only those who go "all the way", this is the hero's journey and root of shamanism, to transcend life and death and then bring back knowledge from sources unseen my most. We are a finite system yes, but we also have an "infinite" capability, this has been lost for millennia by charlatans for control. read Moody's work on death...
@twcjr44 These sources also reside in relativity in the spirit world, of which goes all the way to the God head, that being so vast an incompressible it is said some mystics go mad when seeing it, gibbering and ranting in confused dialogue. Buddhism also talks of an absolute, after passing through the bardos to be confronted with the "ground of all being", "vast illumination" beyond comprehension, where do they get their source material?. they didn't make it up? metaphysics needs an overhaul..
@twcjr44 I'm also not being polemic for the sake of it, I just feel that the "approximation" to infinity can be "intuited" yes, as you said, but the statement "never be attained" is erroneous as many have died for the record, and come back? more research will prove this. We are bound by the three resonant fields (of negativity) I've mentioned via Kabbalistic doctrine. those fields weren't added to expand philosophical debate? rather as a yogi's pathway to the absolute?
There is really no metaphysical disagreement except one of semantics. I use the word infinity like a mathematician uses it -- a number which is, by definition, impossible to achieve. You are using it to describe the concept/metaphor of boundlessness, beyond limitation, and such -- it denotes a relationship (unlimited vastness and capability) -- a descriptive functional definition more that a precise number describing an actual quanty.
@twcjr44 I'm aiming at getting beyond the semantic yes, and seeing it rather as a relationship yes, but for different reasons. I'm coming from a panentheists view of immanent and transcendental aspect of consciousness. We at any given point (in relativity) are mirroring our own consciousness to a given point of "depletion of ideas, thoughts ect" like a finite boundary, this takes time, and then there is a gap, after that a breakthrough to a new wave envelope....
@twcjr44 I think on an intuitive level the "gap" or "space" to the next great envelope is what the LHC is looking for, a substrate or particle (boson higgs) that underpins the other parts we see. Complex discussion, hard to discuss here, but the micro/macro is definitely involved onto a new level with the LHC/human mind relationship.
@twcjr44 what "evolution" are we talking about, "vertical" or "linear" as both have completely different outcomes, this is evident in say, literalist creationist theory vs scientific evolution? both have blind spots, Jung himself thought UFO phenomena part of the collective archetypal experience of humanity and yet now the phenomena has evolved including crop circle phenomena (which is measurable in science), a good example of an "open system" evolving with "possibilities to explore"?
@twcjr44 maybe yes, the limits of our size, freedom and complexity of the system has reached a "seeming" impasse, but if the quantum statement comes to the fore, "the prover proves what the thinker thinks" then if we aren't primed consciously into an open system of thought, (meaning infinity as a possibility) then our own mind becomes a closed system influencing the outcome of possibilities? we just won't see the possibilities even if they are there? all good thought.
I disagree with a point at 8:00 "science can only deal with the "objective"? remember science is made up of a subjective/collective, that doesn't give it "objectivity"? paradigm shifts prove me right.
group consensus doesn't prove anything as we have seen with fundamental religions and beliefs. In fact I don't think anybody is objective with anything, mainly as this would constitute absolutism? absolutes don't exist? we form absolutes as"belief" withCurrentKnowledgeBase. change is the constant
I agree. by "science can only deal with the "objective", I was refering to what the traditional hard sciences believe, not what is in fact true. The science of My Big TOE is all about a reality that is probabalistic and subjective rather than objective.
@twcjr44 OK, thanks for the clarification, I suppose quantum reality is still part of the paradigm shift in its infancy. LHC is also part of the unfoldment of what "reality" is or isn't from a "hard" sciences back ground. traditional hard science will, like any other science, fall on its sword eventually. thanks.
@twcjr44 also.. I might add that quantum can become completely irregular and absurd until one "subjectively" experiences it in its fullest (if possible). hence the "100 thumbs up as experience" comment. later :)
Restrictions are anathema and exploration is encouraged. Relating perceptions and inter-relating perspectives allows for the necessary extension to a TOE.
No matter where you jump in, a start for you is the beginning that you need, specifically. The more you share, the better your ability to care about what you have uncovered and what others can discover, based on the exchange.
Together, we are not just stronger, we are smarter than when we stand alone.
@LikeItDeep conversely, someone with different opinions may say that the listeners of Thomas Campbell are the insane ones. After all, it's consciousness that tells us black from white, good from bad, right from wrong. The metaphysical world should have been enough to tell you this, back to the drawing board for you.
@MattMillwardSongs A cat is conscious but has no moral sense. So how can it be consciousness that tells right from wrong? I do not understand what you mean by "The metaphysical world should have been enough to tell you this, back to the drawing board for you". David Icke is mad. He hallucinates lizard people. That is why he is know as Dotty Dave.
@LikeItDeep David Icke's Lizards come from Shamanistic roots. He sources material from many sources. If you talk to Indigenous elders (Aust.) they too see (add "people" to each animal_ "lizard, bird, insect, reptiles of all types, bats, apes etc, these explanations science dubs as "totemic" but they access the causal plane which exposes the "trait" of said animal which "piggy backs" onto the human, so Icke isn't wrong, he's just using a foreign semantic construct.
As a group, that is hard to determine. Most atheists who contact me are in strong agreement, a few are on the fence and frightened (afraid that a clever "hook" is hidden somewhere), very few assume that MBT is another belief system because they predisposed to jump to that conclusion. I suspect it mostly depends on whether they are open-minded or true believers. Yes, one can believe in atheism just as resolutely and irrationally as one can believe in any religion.
@twcjr44 I was referring to the comments I've been reading on these videos. They all sound like they're disagreeing with this man as if they don't believe in any metaphysical possibilities.
Sad but true. Atheists and theists alike, as well as those whose minds are captured by cultural, scientific or personal beliefs tend to jump to erroneous conclusions because of their beliefs. Fear, ignorance, ego, and belief cause people to limit themselves to an existence that contains no path to becoming all that they could be. The good news is that many individuals are in the process of breaking out of this self-imposed imprisonment.
@twcjr44 well stated. As a Christian I found myself accepting doctrine just because I've been taught it. The same can be true of any philosophy. Ask the tough questions, probe into everything, accept nothing unless you've studied it--accept only what is unquestionable the truth today. Tomorrow everything can change.
@barryfike ....."Tomorrow everything can change".............ya got that right! my discovery of Serapis Christus has flipped a few of my theological notions! wow, the whole deal based on a created Greek-Egyptian diety!
@twcjr44 So true! "Bits" of information have been passed between "entities" forever. From the sub-atomic realm, up to humans, the passage of information exceeds our understanding of what it means. This is why I respect your work so much. Teaching what it means to exchange this information in wise ways. So crucial.
@boorens18 Instantly skeptical is good - that's what he's asking you to be. And rather than forcing you to read the charts... 'don't feel obligated'... they are available on the website to read if you do wish to take a look in more detail. Enjoy x
Look Closely.. 0:23 seconds into his warm welcome ritual, he flashes a pentagram and shares a brotherly handshake with his call-el-leage... JORDAN MAXWELL, might be more informative on these matters. Just watch the craft at work at 23 seconds into this seminar
@sunnymars11 I see what u mean by the star, but I'm quite sure that's just an example of how our minds like to play tricks on us. It's only an illusion cast to your eye by the angle of your view as he picked up the paper. It doesn't mean anything subliminal and is quite certainly not intentional.
We are on a frequency or dimension we can decode with the five senses our brain and body (which is merely a vessel for conciousness) can decode. Other expressions of conciousness (or realities) can exist parallel to others on different frequencies.
After deeper contemplation I realise you do state that a digital understanding of reality is more functional and never implied it was complete. Forgive my overly dismissive response. I anticipate the work you are doing will help discourage blind empiricism. If you have written any literature on the relationship between monism and pluralism encompassed through consciousness, I would be most grateful.
Subjectivity is not missing, it is omnipresent – Many, if not most, individuals in every civilization have married democracy and justice. Perception and interpretation is personal and individual as is the awareness of each individuated unit of consciousness.
@twcjr44 If this is true, subjectivity is objective. The fact that individuals marry democracy and justice is very different from reflecting a solid blueprint of this balance. Hailing noosphere, as more innate than geosphere is dangerous. Data we process is affected by environment and soft evolution. The dynamic between mind body and soul flows with an interconnected ebb. Mind is only a component of nature not the other way round. 'Science is blind without religion' Albert Einstein
@gulliverfridge Democracy can never be married to justice. Democracy is literally 'ruled by the mob', and I think anyone can agree that a mob knows no justice. Second, civility isn't necessarily a 'good' thing, I'd challenge that a rule by a government to push upon people order through complaisant citizens isn't a very evolutionary concept for humanity. Consider too that government is a means of mind control. So, what I believe you'd be looking for is a Republic of Sovereigns to find justice.
@thedoginthefog Agree that civility and democracy are flawed concepts but your use of evolution to describe human endeavour is even more concerning. In order for human governance to nurture equilibrium, it must represent the diverse factions within human culture as well as the dynamic vitality of global community as a whole. Terms like 'Republic' and 'Sovereign' might better be replaced with 'Monopanthesis' and 'Prosperitician'. Thank you for your response
How to Improve The Higher State in co-herance with the Brain.... Increase The Amount of Active Cells within the Mind... How... The Body and Mind Rely On Energy, And How that Energy Is t\ransfered.... when a new Connection is Formed in the Frontal Lobes it allows More Universal Awareness Into the Mind.... The full State need the Whole Mind and More. Yet the whole Mind can Not attain the Due to Eg.. Ego in this Reality Removes the Hearts Consious Connection to Divine Light.. The Soul is The Heart
We Can achieve the Higher Consiosness Through removing the Etheric Mind.... Consiousness needs to Grow and stand Outside the Human Ego...... The Frontal Lobes and the whole Brain is Unawakened and Wont Allow Consiousness Fullfil its Goal.... Enlighhtenment Happens when Mind Displaced the Awareness Of this state Of Reality... The Universal Consiousness can Be Formed By the Unity Of The Subconsious and Consious Mind.... Balance the two states and you Bring Full Consious Awakening.... Im Learning..
( Diracs sea ) T=0K. According to Quantum theory the Vacuum gives birth to virtual/ energy particles who can change into real particles. And from these real particles were created everything in the World.
We are logical and conscious humans. Doesnt
it mean what the virtual/ energy particles and Vacuum also must be some kind of consciousness ?
@socratus1 of course for if we are enternal infinate consciousness, like all the drops in the ocean we are all one, different kinds granted but all from the same making. the LAWS cannot be altered. Not to say we cant run cars on water ect this is only because we do not know all there is. Once we do then we can say we do understand the LAWS, and wee maybe able to do things we now consider to be impossible.
In order to understand what Mr. Campbell tries to explain in 18 videos with lots of contradictions, I suggest you better see Chuck Hillig, THE MEANING OF LIFE, in youtube, and with that you will understand everything in just 13 minutes. Save your time.
If anyone is familiar with Kabbalah, (authentic Kabbalah) which I have been studying for the past 4 months (a pathetic amount of time) it is remarkable how toms alleged experience in the whole of reality spookily parallels that of kabbalah.
Consider its astounding inferences and implications.
The single, underlying law ... of nature! Not merely of physics, chemistry, psychology, biology, etc., but of all fields of inquiry known to humankind. The law we can all relate to, identify, understand and apply.
Ask yourself. What is the underlying law of nature?
Delight in the question. Have fun in the process of finding the answer firsthand for yourself.
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA IM ME THE ONES I LOVE ARE ME I MADE EVERYTHING IN MY LIFE HAPPEN SO IT DOSENT MATTER ANYMORE HAHAHAHAHAA NOW WHAT? WHAT DO I DO? TALK TO YOU ALL? YOUR NOT EVEN HERE!!!!!! ANYTHING YOU SAY WILL BE WORDS REFLECTED OFF OF MY INTERPETATION!!! WHERE ARE YOU??? IM CRYING!!!!! WAAAH WAAAH WAAAH! IS THERE ANYBODY OUT THERE? IS THERE ANYBODY? ANYBODY? If I want you to be :) Love You All. <3's and :-)'s
Consciousness is just tricking you and creating a 3d illusion and manifesting other people, which are you. You are looking into a mirror, consciousness is creating itself in a physical human so it can experience itself. When your physical experience is over the universe no longer exists and you return to infinite all knowing consciousness which can never be destroyed.
We are all part of the eternal beautiful ocean of consciousness thats all around us right now, WE are gods, people look externally for a godhead and are scared to label themself god as people will think they're nuts. WE ARE GOD/INFINATE CONSCIOUSNESS/ENERGY, connecting and experiencing itself through a 3D illusion, we are all in our own separate reality, you are not the skin you're in, you are the lifeforce driving that vessel, and nothing exists outside of you, everyone in your life is energy
y is everyone's reality the same?ok my friends they have a different life but if this life is an illusion , y is it that they all are experiencing the same 3d illusion...its not like they say that they witness objects rising to the sky instead of falling on the ground .
so let me me tell you what i think..
consciousness exists..its got to do something with the human soul(some sort of an energy body probably made of dark matter..
so when you die ...the soul or the energy body or in other words consciousness if you want to call it goes into the higher dimensions...
consciousness cant trick everyone's consciousness to create the same reality..i mean same physical matter world around everyone else unless ofcourse this physical world exists in reality...
@Kostly There is 'active' energy in those things. They aren't at absolute zero so there is heat energy. There's nothing special about the energy or matter that you are composed of. It's the way that the energy and matter is organized that makes you conscious and 'you'
Scientists will never figure out the universe if they keep searching externally for the truth, they think they are separate from the external and the external is all alien. To figure out the nature of reality they need to look internally! And realize nothing exists, consciousness is just decoding itself through a human brain and creates the 3d world in order to realize it exists. This 3D world is an absolute illusion, by consciousness perceiving through a human body it creates matter.
Perception creates matter, when consciousness leaves your body when the body "dies" the universe effectively dies with you, as consciousness isn't perceiving through a single experience matter is no longer being manifested, you are god, you create this 3D Matrix through the left hemisphere of the brain decoding it as solid. Consciousness decodes it like this because if it didnt and everything is just energy how will it know it exists? It needs to experience itself. Ask a physicist, whats an atom
Yeah....It was religion that turned me off to religion. Actually it was my Dad, who was the most "Religious" person I ever knew. EVERYTHING was centered around Jesus. Praying 7x a day is Ok for some, but not for me. When he forced me to pray like that when I was a kid, it was the perfect way to turn me off.
Also, after praying, he would go back to judging, cussing, and sinning just as must as anyone else. The majority of people in the church are the same way I found.
@unshutoptic1 I think most atheists are this way. I could be totally wrong. But, it seems to me that they've been subjected to a sort of crash course in "religion". I agree with your thought, though, that religion is troublesome. In order for the experience to be the most real, free will, open mind, heart and exploration must be fully engaged. It may sound like "hocus pocus", but, that is what I see as the most beneficial "way".
@Kostly ...Absolutely. Also, I have somewhat of a love-hate relationship with atheists. The fact that they think for themselves is to be commended. But the problem I have with them is they seem to believe that "God" in the religious sense, does not display enough evidence to prove his existence. For me, existence itself is proof enough...
@unshutoptic1 Nice job man. Sounds just like my dad, except I never got a chance to make ammends, he died faithfully. It's taken me 7 years to have accepted atheism. Now, I'm not so sure, as I left beliefs behind when I left my church, having an open mind took me to meditation, however, I am still unable and will never trust religion ever again. If possible, meditation might help.
@leovraiel .....Man is the one who tell you that those words in the holy texts are the words of God...How can you trust Man? There's some very intelligent people in the world, but not even someone with 25% brain capacity can understand the concept of God, not completely.
Religion has been a ruse for Man to control one another, and I won't have any part of it...Who says you have to go to church to be a good and spiritual person? Man, that's who..
You have just proved what a low intelect dipshit you really are. You can't tell the differecnce between a persons right to state their opinion and forcing someone to believe as they do. Crawl back under your rock and stop commenting when yo have NO CLUE what you're talking about. Live in a Communist country where you are told what to think and believe and see the difference. So, once again, no one is forcing anything upon you ...STUPID!!!! Try not to use expletives if you can, loser.
@IxKnow: I know what you're saying but my point is this, they can TRY to force us but we don't have to do anything we don't want to do. In dictatorials countries where they tell you what to think and do they can only have policies and try to enforce them, the decision to heed or reject thiose policies is the personal freedom we all have regardless of the consequences. IE: Islam may terrorize us but we all still have a choice as to what we want to do and believe in the end. We all have freewill.
This has been flagged as spam show
Hidden in Our Inspirations and Hidden all over this planet in the Landscaping- God Hid Watermarks and in them He tells things about the past, present and future. I found them and made videos out of some of them. I found the Garden of Eden and I found what happened right before that and it shows pictures of God in them. Please come look and see something really fascinating. God's real and I can prove it. Please help me share this.
downyourtube 2 weeks ago
I am barely 18 and I am the only person in my school obsessed with Metaphysics and reading Aristotle and watching these kinds of videos. I LOVE this video.
raikou6 2 weeks ago
@raikou6 lead the pack out of darkness ;-)
earthacademy 2 days ago
Good information
BronzeEmpress 4 weeks ago
Look at all the women in the front row seats. That's apropriate because metaphysics is a feminine subject.
shamelessfootfucker 1 month ago
Great video, added to my favs, thank you.
My5tuff4u 1 month ago
Comment removed
richobenard 1 month ago
Also, can't objective experience be the experience of the world through the objective mind? I don't mean the physical organ (the brain) but I mean looking through the mind with an objective point of view?
avataratg12 2 months ago
@avataratg12
All points of view are personal, that is, subjective.
twcjr44 2 months ago
but at the same time, all of this makes me think about how the indian tribes used all of the animals part respectively and cared about each life they took. They had a respective spiritual way of looking at the lives they took. Did they not have the conciousness to understand this theory? Because, weren't (and aren't--because I'm pretty sure that in some places they still exist) they also people? I respect vegetarianism, but I also really respect this as well. Anyone want to help me out?
avataratg12 2 months ago
@avataratg12
No problem with the indians you describe. The moral problem arises when one kills unecessarily for fun or pleasure rather than for survival.
twcjr44 2 months ago 2
Thank you Mr. Campbell for your introduction, but I do have a question. And if anyone else can help me answer this that would be great too. Respectfully I am a vegetarian not only because I follow eastern Philosophy (Buddhism) but also because it helps the environment and because I believe that as a human being, I have the conciousness of empathy and understanding that other things can suffer the same amount of pain as I can. Continued...
avataratg12 2 months ago
All creatures feed on other creatures if u had any basic knowledge of the food chain u would understand that it is neither evil nor non-evil but essential to avoid overpopulation famine disease etc. If u think humans kill in cruel ways, watch a bear rip the head off a salmon. I don't believe to be cruel, just behaving in a manner to optimize survival. A very prominent theory suggests that when humans switched to high protein food sources, the size of our brains expanded dramatically. So u might
mpspreier 4 months ago
@mpspreier,
What I said is that I have no problem with killing and eating other critters for survival. I am against killing other critters for fun and pleasure -- when survival is not an issue.
twcjr44 3 months ago
@mpspreier Your logic is flawed. The reason many species on this planet give birth to scores of young is to make up for the amount of young that get taken by predators. So, if there weren't so many predators then the amount of young that they give birth to would lessen, resolving the overpopulation problem. We have evolved higher intelligence, and the more intelligence you have, the more you realize that living off other creatures will never bring peace. The future will bring more of this.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
socratus1 4 months ago
This guy is on point.
tatsumakisempyukaku 6 months ago
@1simonmatthews Did I mention that you are a whorecock niggerpig?
Ewochable 6 months ago
evolution is so slow that it doesn't even happen.
cwross1976 7 months ago
One that has a decision space greater than zero -- i.e., an entity that purposely (by exercizing individual intent) can make choices.
twcjr44 8 months ago
Its Santa!! I always believed in you! Jk.. i never believed!!! Hahahahaha
MrKerplumpskee 8 months ago
@MatrixReality2011 Sorry I don't understand what you are trying to say to me. How does what you say relate to my comment? Do you mean that we are manipulated into finding it ok to kill for gains? If so then I agree.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
If any body likes ideas like Toms and has some ideas laying around jot them down at SNUFF.FORUMOTION
jmoneylee 9 months ago
If our goal is to lower our entropy, and lower entropy means love, should we all be working towards becoming vegetarian? And will predation, parasitism, and the like, slowly disappear? Because I can't see a system reaching love as long as creatures live off other creatures, since there will always be suffering this way.
1simonmatthews 9 months ago 2
@1simonmatthews
Evolution is a very slow process. Killing sentient beings (other animals) for pleasure (unnecessarily) is not on the path toward love.
twcjr44 9 months ago 7
@twcjr44 I can't see how killing sentient beings for any reason is on the path toward love. Unless it's the love of meat :)
1simonmatthews 9 months ago
@twcjr44
Define a sentient being.
knifecollector93 8 months ago
@twcjr44 No offense to you Tom, but how can more people like this comment than mine above? It makes no sense to me. "Killing sentient beings unnecessarily is not on the path toward love". So, if there was a shortage of beef and other meat, by your own logic, killing another human would still be on the path toward love because it would be necessary for your survival. I'm sorry, but this logic is just wrong. I'm sure if you were the intended meal, you'd think differently.
1simonmatthews 3 months ago
@1simonmatthews Does it occur to you that there's a reason for it? If we removed ourselves from the equation, and just watched, what could we learn from the animal's suffering? I don't claim to understand why creature must feed on creature, but I can't imagine that it doesn't affect some sort of balance in the Universe. The natural order of this planet seems like the correct order for the planet, and it would completely change what (for example) a "lion" is if that lion no longer ate meat.
jigaboon 8 months ago
@jigaboon That's your view and your entitled to it. It's pretty much the mainstream view. My view is just more radical. I believe that it must be possible for the universe to evolve to a point where predation is nonexistent, and I'll do my bit to head it in that direction. It doesn't help that man helps save predators from extinction. Maybe they were meant to become extinct. There's less predators now than during the dinosaurs, so the direction is evident. That's my view. You don't have to agree
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews but WHY is it "better" to achieve a point where there are no longer predators? Is it Evil in itself to feed on other creatures, as in the way we were designed? I'm not saying I disagree necessarily, or that I agree, either, I would just like to hear more opinions. Who's to say a perfect system couldn't be achieved on the opposite side of the spectrum, a system where EVERY creature was a predator?
jigaboon 8 months ago
@jigaboon It all depends on what YOU think is evil I suppose. It's subjective. I think it's evil, or wrong at least, to feed on other creatures. You can think what you want, but it'll never change my view. Even if there was a God and he said it wasn't wrong, I'd disagree with him too. If I was in charge I'd design it differently. If a lion ate your child I would think you may see things differently. Or if superior aliens landed and saw us as food. I simply choose to aim for the other spectrum.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews Humans are designed that way buddy. We may have the option of going vegetarian but we still have the instinct to kill and hunt. and there will always be suffering anyway. Maybe with smaller communities, lower population (Just use condoms people. Look at africa?)
knifecollector93 8 months ago
@knifecollector93 Are you saying that humans are a design? If so, who do you think may have designed them? I myself don't have the instinct to kill and hunt, but I do have the instinct to protect the meek from those who do, and dying for that isn't a problem at all for me. I have no fear. How do you know there will always be suffering buddy? "Always" is a long time. Have you projected evolution trillions of years into the future? I like to think more radically. You can do what you want.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews
I never pretended to have the answers.
You DO have those instincts, You've forgotten how to use them.
A high population will result in suffering. more people -life at a basic level
A low(er?) population - more wealth spread out among the populations, better housing/care/etc.
btw- I'm not sure what you meant with that "I myself don't have the instinct to kill and hunt, but I do have the instinct to protect the meek from those who do" line..I'm a volunteer EMT.
knifecollector93 8 months ago
@knifecollector93 How can you say you don't have the answers and then preach facts to me? I haven't forgotten how to use the instinct to kill and hunt, I've made a conscious decision not to and as a result the instinct has gone. Even if I was starving I would not kill to survive, I would allow myself to die. I wouldn't even be tempted. High/low population, yes that's logical. As I said, I'm thinking radically. I think there must be a way for the universe to work without predation. (Continued.)
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@knifecollector93 (Cont) There is a fathomless amount of time to achieve this goal, so we might as well try. I'm thinking vastly into the future. I never used to think this way. I used to eat meat. But I believe I'm thinking more clearly now, not less clearly. There is a vast and demonstrable improvement in my academic abilities, which I could go into. So it's logical to conclude that my changed views are a direct result of my improved cognitive abilities. This is what I believe to be the case.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@knifecollector93 About my comment "I myself don't have the instinct to kill and hunt, but I do have the instinct to protect the meek from those who do". It is what it is. Don't try to read anything personal in it. There was nothing personal in it. If you thought that it was directed at you personally then that's an issue that you have with yourself. I was just telling you what my instincts were. It's more about bullying than hunting really - I want to protect the bullied. Nothing aimed at you.
1simonmatthews 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews I thought it was like that, hard to find any emotion when dealing with this text based stuff. No worries, I've got that same mindset...to a point lol
knifecollector93 8 months ago
@1simonmatthews vegetarian would be a good start, but being vegan removes using animals for their resources in any way (as far as possible at least in this society). dont cause harm is the only rule we need. buying products that experiment on animals or still use their resources just not their meat(dairy cows are used for their meat once they dont produce enough milk anyway) is still supporting that industry.
peoplemadeofcats 4 months ago
@peoplemadeofcats Agreed. Well I've stopped eating meat after being brought up in a meat-eating family, so it's a step in the right direction. I tried soya milk but it's too vile. I wish I could go all the way but I need milk in my diet. I don't eat much as it is, I'm a naturally thin person. I hope they come up with a more palatable alternative to milk soon. I started writing a veggie/anti-predation speech today. It's radical and will probably attract lots of haters, but what the hey...
1simonmatthews 4 months ago
@1simonmatthews This comment being in the top comment gives me a cold shiver down my spine.
vennish11 5 days ago
@vennish11 Which comment?
1simonmatthews 5 days ago
Something I've been thinking about. In the double-slit experiment, why doesn't the wave function collapse when we observe it hitting the back screen? And do you think that if someone fired single tennis balls toward two slits inside a sealed chamber of equal proportion, they would behave the same way as single electrons? It's just that we wouldn't be able to know? And what if there were more slits in the chamber? Would the electron go through them all?
1simonmatthews 9 months ago
@1simonmatthews,
It does, yes, yes. To answer these questions in detail and learn more about the double slit experiment google "bottomlayer" by Ross Rhodes -- particularly look at the "Reality Program" -- results are given on last half of chapter two.
twcjr44 9 months ago
@twcjr44 Thanks, I'll take a look at that. What about the first question though? Shouldn't the back screen in the double-slit experiment only show the pattern of hits by a particle instead of showing an interference pattern, because we are observing this too?
1simonmatthews 9 months ago
@1simonmatthews
The answer to your first question above was: "It does". But it is not measuring descrete particles, only an accumulation of energy as one would expect from a wave. Ross Rhodes will explain the details. at the measurement, that energy is brought into this reality
twcjr44 9 months ago
@twcjr44 Ok, thank you. I've started reading the Reality Program now. Love this kind of stuff.
1simonmatthews 9 months ago
@1simonmatthews Superposition - Theelectron does everything at the same time! weird huh. It only equates a definate path when you observe it.
UnifiedPerfection 7 months ago
@UnifiedPerfection Yeah that's weird! Nature seems like some sort of design to me. And if there is one consciousness that creates all the living creatures, then this consciousness seems to be paranoid of itself. Just look at the way people speak to each other on here. Perhaps it's in its youth : )
1simonmatthews 7 months ago
Questions on Cambell's "Big TOE": According to Cambell, when we die we go to the non-physical reality, where we can choose to "jump right back in" to the physical reality. My question is, if we can choose whatever creature we come back as, who in their right mind would ever choose to come back as something like a rectal worm?
1simonmatthews 9 months ago
@1simonmatthews.
One comes back with a form (species) and condition that optimize the probability of positively evolving one's consciousness. If you are a rectal worm, coming back as a worm is about right for you:-). Actually species with very small decision space have more of a "group soul" rather than an individual soul. Their evolutionary potential is not great enough to warrant individual attention.
twcjr44 9 months ago
@twcjr44 So does this mean "once a worm, always a worm", or can they get gradual promotion, if you like? And also, can you get demoted down the chain if you don't show much potential? I worry about this :)
1simonmatthews 9 months ago
@1simonmatthews,
Gradual promotions and demotions are earned according to the quality of the decisions made.
twcjr44 9 months ago
I like Cambell's "Big TOE", it rings true with me, and thoughts I've had correlate exactly with some of the things he said, but I have questions. How did the system as a whole begin? Where did it come from? Where is the information coming from?
1simonmatthews 9 months ago
@1simonmatthews,
The answer to this question in in Book 1 -- find them free on Google Books
twcjr44 9 months ago
@twcjr44 Thanks very much.
1simonmatthews 9 months ago
Hello, Thomas Campbell. :) Since I've discovered your videos, I've really been interested in your findings. I tend to be very light on "acquiring" knowledge through books and other's teachings. As much as I can, I try to let my experience dictate who I am, where I am, what I am. **Sigh** I am sure this thought of mine is not an original thought. That thought consists of the FUNDAMENTAL aspect of the universe. That aspect is information exchange. From the sub atomic realm, to you speakin
Kostly 9 months ago
hèy_añyøÑÈ_wÀnñÃ_chat_wìth_mE_I_féÊl_sØ_lóÑÊlý_tôdÂY♪
LoveaaSharaau179 10 months ago
due to the relative nature of the physical senses and entropy...of said senses due to the laws of physics, all sense perceptions are therefore relative therefore all observation is subjective? Intuition can only hint at a possible objective reality but can't "prove" it. We are an open system according to ilya prigogine's theory of open systems, open means open to new information, which is infinite?
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@johnscottartist,
See comment below. Evolving systems are open systems because they are continuingly reinventing themselves as they process experience. Evolution continues as long as there are possibilities to explore -- an open process -- but depending on the degrees of freedom, size, and complexity of the system, it is not necessarily infinite. "Apparently unending" and "no end imaginable" is not the same thing as infinite. One must live with uncertainty -- infinite is an absolute.
twcjr44 11 months ago
@twcjr44 "freedom, size, and complexity of the system, it is not necessarily infinite" if something has a "size" then this is finite, not an open system?
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@johnscottartist,
Finite systems can be open. No real system can be infinite. By definition, Infinity can be approached/approximated but never attained.
Tom
twcjr44 11 months ago
@twcjr44 I disagree again, this negates the origin of metaphysics in the first place, eg Kabbalah has a "process" or "pathway" to the infinite, through the ain, ain soph, ain soph ur, known as the "veil". if it didn't have this in its doctrine then it wouldn't be possible, The ain, ain soph, ain soph ur, translates no thing, no limit, boundless light. This is a veil from the relative to the absolute. many sites seem to invert ain and ain soph ur for some reason....perhaps to obfuscate research?
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@twcjr44 Tom, Shamans transcend this veil regularly, so your statement is relative and subjective, that it can "never be obtained". It can be obtained IMO for only those who go "all the way", this is the hero's journey and root of shamanism, to transcend life and death and then bring back knowledge from sources unseen my most. We are a finite system yes, but we also have an "infinite" capability, this has been lost for millennia by charlatans for control. read Moody's work on death...
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@twcjr44 These sources also reside in relativity in the spirit world, of which goes all the way to the God head, that being so vast an incompressible it is said some mystics go mad when seeing it, gibbering and ranting in confused dialogue. Buddhism also talks of an absolute, after passing through the bardos to be confronted with the "ground of all being", "vast illumination" beyond comprehension, where do they get their source material?. they didn't make it up? metaphysics needs an overhaul..
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@twcjr44 I'm also not being polemic for the sake of it, I just feel that the "approximation" to infinity can be "intuited" yes, as you said, but the statement "never be attained" is erroneous as many have died for the record, and come back? more research will prove this. We are bound by the three resonant fields (of negativity) I've mentioned via Kabbalistic doctrine. those fields weren't added to expand philosophical debate? rather as a yogi's pathway to the absolute?
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@johnscottartist,
There is really no metaphysical disagreement except one of semantics. I use the word infinity like a mathematician uses it -- a number which is, by definition, impossible to achieve. You are using it to describe the concept/metaphor of boundlessness, beyond limitation, and such -- it denotes a relationship (unlimited vastness and capability) -- a descriptive functional definition more that a precise number describing an actual quanty.
Tom
twcjr44 11 months ago
@twcjr44 I'm aiming at getting beyond the semantic yes, and seeing it rather as a relationship yes, but for different reasons. I'm coming from a panentheists view of immanent and transcendental aspect of consciousness. We at any given point (in relativity) are mirroring our own consciousness to a given point of "depletion of ideas, thoughts ect" like a finite boundary, this takes time, and then there is a gap, after that a breakthrough to a new wave envelope....
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@twcjr44 I think on an intuitive level the "gap" or "space" to the next great envelope is what the LHC is looking for, a substrate or particle (boson higgs) that underpins the other parts we see. Complex discussion, hard to discuss here, but the micro/macro is definitely involved onto a new level with the LHC/human mind relationship.
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@twcjr44 what "evolution" are we talking about, "vertical" or "linear" as both have completely different outcomes, this is evident in say, literalist creationist theory vs scientific evolution? both have blind spots, Jung himself thought UFO phenomena part of the collective archetypal experience of humanity and yet now the phenomena has evolved including crop circle phenomena (which is measurable in science), a good example of an "open system" evolving with "possibilities to explore"?
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@twcjr44 maybe yes, the limits of our size, freedom and complexity of the system has reached a "seeming" impasse, but if the quantum statement comes to the fore, "the prover proves what the thinker thinks" then if we aren't primed consciously into an open system of thought, (meaning infinity as a possibility) then our own mind becomes a closed system influencing the outcome of possibilities? we just won't see the possibilities even if they are there? all good thought.
johnscottartist 11 months ago
I disagree with a point at 8:00 "science can only deal with the "objective"? remember science is made up of a subjective/collective, that doesn't give it "objectivity"? paradigm shifts prove me right.
group consensus doesn't prove anything as we have seen with fundamental religions and beliefs. In fact I don't think anybody is objective with anything, mainly as this would constitute absolutism? absolutes don't exist? we form absolutes as"belief" withCurrentKnowledgeBase. change is the constant
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@johnscottartist,
I agree. by "science can only deal with the "objective", I was refering to what the traditional hard sciences believe, not what is in fact true. The science of My Big TOE is all about a reality that is probabalistic and subjective rather than objective.
twcjr44 11 months ago
@twcjr44 OK, thanks for the clarification, I suppose quantum reality is still part of the paradigm shift in its infancy. LHC is also part of the unfoldment of what "reality" is or isn't from a "hard" sciences back ground. traditional hard science will, like any other science, fall on its sword eventually. thanks.
johnscottartist 11 months ago
@twcjr44 also.. I might add that quantum can become completely irregular and absurd until one "subjectively" experiences it in its fullest (if possible). hence the "100 thumbs up as experience" comment. later :)
johnscottartist 11 months ago
experience as teacher, 100 thumbs up
johnscottartist 11 months ago
A TOE starts with a theory of anything ;)
Restrictions are anathema and exploration is encouraged. Relating perceptions and inter-relating perspectives allows for the necessary extension to a TOE.
No matter where you jump in, a start for you is the beginning that you need, specifically. The more you share, the better your ability to care about what you have uncovered and what others can discover, based on the exchange.
Together, we are not just stronger, we are smarter than when we stand alone.
Sueezedtight 11 months ago
PISS!!!! PISS IN MY ASSSS!!!!!!!!!! Its everywhere, I need BRAWNY WIPES
FrankDaTank1218 1 year ago
@FrankDaTank1218 What the hell dude
hubbabubbamax000 11 months ago
The sane man's David Icke
LikeItDeep 1 year ago
@LikeItDeep conversely, someone with different opinions may say that the listeners of Thomas Campbell are the insane ones. After all, it's consciousness that tells us black from white, good from bad, right from wrong. The metaphysical world should have been enough to tell you this, back to the drawing board for you.
MattMillwardSongs 11 months ago
@MattMillwardSongs A cat is conscious but has no moral sense. So how can it be consciousness that tells right from wrong? I do not understand what you mean by "The metaphysical world should have been enough to tell you this, back to the drawing board for you". David Icke is mad. He hallucinates lizard people. That is why he is know as Dotty Dave.
LikeItDeep 11 months ago
@LikeItDeep David Icke's Lizards come from Shamanistic roots. He sources material from many sources. If you talk to Indigenous elders (Aust.) they too see (add "people" to each animal_ "lizard, bird, insect, reptiles of all types, bats, apes etc, these explanations science dubs as "totemic" but they access the causal plane which exposes the "trait" of said animal which "piggy backs" onto the human, so Icke isn't wrong, he's just using a foreign semantic construct.
johnscottartist 11 months ago
Are the Atheists in disagreement?
jshjamaar 1 year ago
@jshjamaar,
As a group, that is hard to determine. Most atheists who contact me are in strong agreement, a few are on the fence and frightened (afraid that a clever "hook" is hidden somewhere), very few assume that MBT is another belief system because they predisposed to jump to that conclusion. I suspect it mostly depends on whether they are open-minded or true believers. Yes, one can believe in atheism just as resolutely and irrationally as one can believe in any religion.
twcjr44 1 year ago 2
@twcjr44 I was referring to the comments I've been reading on these videos. They all sound like they're disagreeing with this man as if they don't believe in any metaphysical possibilities.
jshjamaar 1 year ago
@jshjamaar
Sad but true. Atheists and theists alike, as well as those whose minds are captured by cultural, scientific or personal beliefs tend to jump to erroneous conclusions because of their beliefs. Fear, ignorance, ego, and belief cause people to limit themselves to an existence that contains no path to becoming all that they could be. The good news is that many individuals are in the process of breaking out of this self-imposed imprisonment.
twcjr44 1 year ago 11
@twcjr44 well stated. As a Christian I found myself accepting doctrine just because I've been taught it. The same can be true of any philosophy. Ask the tough questions, probe into everything, accept nothing unless you've studied it--accept only what is unquestionable the truth today. Tomorrow everything can change.
barryfike 1 year ago
@barryfike ....."Tomorrow everything can change".............ya got that right! my discovery of Serapis Christus has flipped a few of my theological notions! wow, the whole deal based on a created Greek-Egyptian diety!
acerb45666555 11 months ago
@twcjr44 So true! "Bits" of information have been passed between "entities" forever. From the sub-atomic realm, up to humans, the passage of information exceeds our understanding of what it means. This is why I respect your work so much. Teaching what it means to exchange this information in wise ways. So crucial.
Kostly 9 months ago
"I'm gonna show you a lot of charts.......don't feel obligated to read them"
That was the sketchiest line ever....INSTANTLY skeptical.
boorens18 1 year ago
@boorens18 Instantly skeptical is good - that's what he's asking you to be. And rather than forcing you to read the charts... 'don't feel obligated'... they are available on the website to read if you do wish to take a look in more detail. Enjoy x
Moon296 1 year ago
satanism!!!
Brute4rce 1 year ago
@Brute4rce lol
ineedaname777777 1 year ago
Look Closely.. 0:23 seconds into his warm welcome ritual, he flashes a pentagram and shares a brotherly handshake with his call-el-leage... JORDAN MAXWELL, might be more informative on these matters. Just watch the craft at work at 23 seconds into this seminar
sunnymars11 1 year ago
Comment removed
radscorpion8 1 year ago
@sunnymars11 I see what u mean by the star, but I'm quite sure that's just an example of how our minds like to play tricks on us. It's only an illusion cast to your eye by the angle of your view as he picked up the paper. It doesn't mean anything subliminal and is quite certainly not intentional.
WanderingPsychonaut 1 year ago
BULLSHIT
Ahti0Maera 1 year ago
Comment removed
JimmyJazzzzzzz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You can watch the synthesized version of that video - 10mins on my channel. watch?v=XGWX1f48mv8
AmazingISI 1 year ago
ALL IS ONE.
thewinesmith 1 year ago
We are on a frequency or dimension we can decode with the five senses our brain and body (which is merely a vessel for conciousness) can decode. Other expressions of conciousness (or realities) can exist parallel to others on different frequencies.
UltraOwl 1 year ago
search 4 desirefirst - what i is
desirefirst 1 year ago
After deeper contemplation I realise you do state that a digital understanding of reality is more functional and never implied it was complete. Forgive my overly dismissive response. I anticipate the work you are doing will help discourage blind empiricism. If you have written any literature on the relationship between monism and pluralism encompassed through consciousness, I would be most grateful.
gulliverfridge 1 year ago
wow this is the dude that was the monkey in Waking Life, everythings coming full circle...
HexicNexus 1 year ago
To systematise universal ethos is to sit on the black hole fence. nature reflected as nature digested
gulliverfridge 1 year ago
Virtual is our touch till child is made from love....
gulliverfridge 1 year ago
We are subjective to truth
gulliverfridge 1 year ago
Physics weighted Transformation cowboy. If subjectivity is all that's missing, why has no civilisation effectively married democracy to justice?
gulliverfridge 1 year ago
@gulliverfridge,
Subjectivity is not missing, it is omnipresent – Many, if not most, individuals in every civilization have married democracy and justice. Perception and interpretation is personal and individual as is the awareness of each individuated unit of consciousness.
twcjr44 1 year ago 12
@twcjr44 If this is true, subjectivity is objective. The fact that individuals marry democracy and justice is very different from reflecting a solid blueprint of this balance. Hailing noosphere, as more innate than geosphere is dangerous. Data we process is affected by environment and soft evolution. The dynamic between mind body and soul flows with an interconnected ebb. Mind is only a component of nature not the other way round. 'Science is blind without religion' Albert Einstein
gulliverfridge 1 year ago 2
@gulliverfridge Democracy can never be married to justice. Democracy is literally 'ruled by the mob', and I think anyone can agree that a mob knows no justice. Second, civility isn't necessarily a 'good' thing, I'd challenge that a rule by a government to push upon people order through complaisant citizens isn't a very evolutionary concept for humanity. Consider too that government is a means of mind control. So, what I believe you'd be looking for is a Republic of Sovereigns to find justice.
thedoginthefog 1 year ago
@thedoginthefog Agree that civility and democracy are flawed concepts but your use of evolution to describe human endeavour is even more concerning. In order for human governance to nurture equilibrium, it must represent the diverse factions within human culture as well as the dynamic vitality of global community as a whole. Terms like 'Republic' and 'Sovereign' might better be replaced with 'Monopanthesis' and 'Prosperitician'. Thank you for your response
gulliverfridge 1 year ago
Bad ass beard
whirly360 1 year ago
How to Improve The Higher State in co-herance with the Brain.... Increase The Amount of Active Cells within the Mind... How... The Body and Mind Rely On Energy, And How that Energy Is t\ransfered.... when a new Connection is Formed in the Frontal Lobes it allows More Universal Awareness Into the Mind.... The full State need the Whole Mind and More. Yet the whole Mind can Not attain the Due to Eg.. Ego in this Reality Removes the Hearts Consious Connection to Divine Light.. The Soul is The Heart
Eilizsia 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We Can achieve the Higher Consiosness Through removing the Etheric Mind.... Consiousness needs to Grow and stand Outside the Human Ego...... The Frontal Lobes and the whole Brain is Unawakened and Wont Allow Consiousness Fullfil its Goal.... Enlighhtenment Happens when Mind Displaced the Awareness Of this state Of Reality... The Universal Consiousness can Be Formed By the Unity Of The Subconsious and Consious Mind.... Balance the two states and you Bring Full Consious Awakening.... Im Learning..
Eilizsia 1 year ago
Comment removed
Eilizsia 1 year ago
Comment removed
Eilizsia 1 year ago
I wish you would all shut the fuck up and watch the magic.
tayfungi 1 year ago
maybe 2012 is when we finally open the door to the larger System and everything changes forever
ImHeavyD 1 year ago
I am The Architect. I created The Matrix. LOL
wakeupfist 1 year ago
life is the most realistic game ever created....to bad its a demo :P
RASAlexander 1 year ago
lmfao he said mm'kay like the guy on south park.... right at 8:44
Iinspirel 1 year ago
glutton punishment lololol why did no one laugh
electronicchronic 1 year ago
The Conscious Universe
The Universe as whole is Infinite/Energy/Vacuum
( Diracs sea ) T=0K. According to Quantum theory the Vacuum gives birth to virtual/ energy particles who can change into real particles. And from these real particles were created everything in the World.
We are logical and conscious humans. Doesnt
it mean what the virtual/ energy particles and Vacuum also must be some kind of consciousness ?
Israel Sadovnik. Socratus
socratus1 1 year ago
@socratus1 of course for if we are enternal infinate consciousness, like all the drops in the ocean we are all one, different kinds granted but all from the same making. the LAWS cannot be altered. Not to say we cant run cars on water ect this is only because we do not know all there is. Once we do then we can say we do understand the LAWS, and wee maybe able to do things we now consider to be impossible.
apsert 1 year ago
anyone hear of entangled water?
junkiedeaddog 1 year ago
In order to understand what Mr. Campbell tries to explain in 18 videos with lots of contradictions, I suggest you better see Chuck Hillig, THE MEANING OF LIFE, in youtube, and with that you will understand everything in just 13 minutes. Save your time.
acuaman42 1 year ago
google Doe's Account, its mindblowing
Kingkalty 1 year ago
this guy is wearing a fake beard and wig btw.
WickedMo13 1 year ago
evil is the thought that thinks it.
Topgeneral3070 1 year ago
If anyone is familiar with Kabbalah, (authentic Kabbalah) which I have been studying for the past 4 months (a pathetic amount of time) it is remarkable how toms alleged experience in the whole of reality spookily parallels that of kabbalah.
w2aiq 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Think of the underlying law of nature.
Consider its astounding inferences and implications.
The single, underlying law ... of nature! Not merely of physics, chemistry, psychology, biology, etc., but of all fields of inquiry known to humankind. The law we can all relate to, identify, understand and apply.
Ask yourself. What is the underlying law of nature?
Delight in the question. Have fun in the process of finding the answer firsthand for yourself.
Google it, as a start.
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
Comment removed
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
Comment removed
TedDGPoulos 1 year ago
fuck this. people think too much.
kittygobark1 1 year ago
oh nose i'm creating 6d illusions now
CharlieMansonIsGod 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA IM ME THE ONES I LOVE ARE ME I MADE EVERYTHING IN MY LIFE HAPPEN SO IT DOSENT MATTER ANYMORE HAHAHAHAHAA NOW WHAT? WHAT DO I DO? TALK TO YOU ALL? YOUR NOT EVEN HERE!!!!!! ANYTHING YOU SAY WILL BE WORDS REFLECTED OFF OF MY INTERPETATION!!! WHERE ARE YOU??? IM CRYING!!!!! WAAAH WAAAH WAAAH! IS THERE ANYBODY OUT THERE? IS THERE ANYBODY? ANYBODY? If I want you to be :) Love You All. <3's and :-)'s
CharlieMansonIsGod 1 year ago
Consciousness is just tricking you and creating a 3d illusion and manifesting other people, which are you. You are looking into a mirror, consciousness is creating itself in a physical human so it can experience itself. When your physical experience is over the universe no longer exists and you return to infinite all knowing consciousness which can never be destroyed.
Schism2o12 1 year ago
We are all part of the eternal beautiful ocean of consciousness thats all around us right now, WE are gods, people look externally for a godhead and are scared to label themself god as people will think they're nuts. WE ARE GOD/INFINATE CONSCIOUSNESS/ENERGY, connecting and experiencing itself through a 3D illusion, we are all in our own separate reality, you are not the skin you're in, you are the lifeforce driving that vessel, and nothing exists outside of you, everyone in your life is energy
Schism2o12 1 year ago
i just want to know few things...
y is everyone's reality the same?ok my friends they have a different life but if this life is an illusion , y is it that they all are experiencing the same 3d illusion...its not like they say that they witness objects rising to the sky instead of falling on the ground .
so let me me tell you what i think..
consciousness exists..its got to do something with the human soul(some sort of an energy body probably made of dark matter..
wmcoach 1 year ago
so when you die ...the soul or the energy body or in other words consciousness if you want to call it goes into the higher dimensions...
consciousness cant trick everyone's consciousness to create the same reality..i mean same physical matter world around everyone else unless ofcourse this physical world exists in reality...
wmcoach 1 year ago
Just like any multi player virtual reality game -- a common set/universe is maintained for all according to the ruleset.
twcjr44 1 year ago 2
@wmcoach Actually when you die, it's all over. Sorry.
CambridgeHeights 1 year ago
@CambridgeHeights Yes it's all over for "you". IF "you" is your body and mind.
Kostly 1 year ago
@Kostly 'You' is your mind or consciousness. What else would it be?
CambridgeHeights 1 year ago
@CambridgeHeights Whatever you want to call the energy inside you, it's not the end for that aspect. I might call it the Greater Conciousness.
Kostly 1 year ago
@Kostly What about the energy inside a battery or a turd? There's energy in those things too.
CambridgeHeights 1 year ago
@CambridgeHeights potential energy is nothing like active energy....
Kostly 1 year ago
@Kostly There is 'active' energy in those things. They aren't at absolute zero so there is heat energy. There's nothing special about the energy or matter that you are composed of. It's the way that the energy and matter is organized that makes you conscious and 'you'
CambridgeHeights 1 year ago
Scientists will never figure out the universe if they keep searching externally for the truth, they think they are separate from the external and the external is all alien. To figure out the nature of reality they need to look internally! And realize nothing exists, consciousness is just decoding itself through a human brain and creates the 3d world in order to realize it exists. This 3D world is an absolute illusion, by consciousness perceiving through a human body it creates matter.
Schism2o12 1 year ago 2
Perception creates matter, when consciousness leaves your body when the body "dies" the universe effectively dies with you, as consciousness isn't perceiving through a single experience matter is no longer being manifested, you are god, you create this 3D Matrix through the left hemisphere of the brain decoding it as solid. Consciousness decodes it like this because if it didnt and everything is just energy how will it know it exists? It needs to experience itself. Ask a physicist, whats an atom
Schism2o12 1 year ago
Science made Weapon,Weapon made Relegion.
hagupachu 1 year ago
Okay, I'm agnostic and you seriously need to stop shoving religion down peoples' throats.
jasonextreme 2 years ago 3
Yeah....It was religion that turned me off to religion. Actually it was my Dad, who was the most "Religious" person I ever knew. EVERYTHING was centered around Jesus. Praying 7x a day is Ok for some, but not for me. When he forced me to pray like that when I was a kid, it was the perfect way to turn me off.
Also, after praying, he would go back to judging, cussing, and sinning just as must as anyone else. The majority of people in the church are the same way I found.
I'm not religious!!!!
unshutoptic1 2 years ago 24
But I am spiritual.....
unshutoptic1 2 years ago 4
@unshutoptic1 I think most atheists are this way. I could be totally wrong. But, it seems to me that they've been subjected to a sort of crash course in "religion". I agree with your thought, though, that religion is troublesome. In order for the experience to be the most real, free will, open mind, heart and exploration must be fully engaged. It may sound like "hocus pocus", but, that is what I see as the most beneficial "way".
Kostly 1 year ago
@Kostly ...Absolutely. Also, I have somewhat of a love-hate relationship with atheists. The fact that they think for themselves is to be commended. But the problem I have with them is they seem to believe that "God" in the religious sense, does not display enough evidence to prove his existence. For me, existence itself is proof enough...
What would we be without consciusness?
unshutoptic1 1 year ago
@unshutoptic1 If existence is evidence of his existence, then why does he not exist?
xXsoutheastbeastXx 1 year ago
@xXsoutheastbeastXx...Ok...you got me, I guess existence doesn't exist..
unshutoptic1 1 year ago
@unshutoptic1 Nice job man. Sounds just like my dad, except I never got a chance to make ammends, he died faithfully. It's taken me 7 years to have accepted atheism. Now, I'm not so sure, as I left beliefs behind when I left my church, having an open mind took me to meditation, however, I am still unable and will never trust religion ever again. If possible, meditation might help.
leovraiel 1 year ago
@leovraiel .....Man is the one who tell you that those words in the holy texts are the words of God...How can you trust Man? There's some very intelligent people in the world, but not even someone with 25% brain capacity can understand the concept of God, not completely.
Religion has been a ruse for Man to control one another, and I won't have any part of it...Who says you have to go to church to be a good and spiritual person? Man, that's who..
unshutoptic1 1 year ago
@unshutoptic1 I understand the concept of God. It's a complete and utter delusion that weak-minded people believe in.
mikeyo1234 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hey stupid who's shoving? If you don't agree, move on and let it go. NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO BELIEVE ANYTHING!
abbyguy 2 years ago
@abbyguy Actually, the only people who force me to believe are religious radicals. Now, I suggest you fuck off and stay out of peoples' business.
jasonextreme 2 years ago
You have just proved what a low intelect dipshit you really are. You can't tell the differecnce between a persons right to state their opinion and forcing someone to believe as they do. Crawl back under your rock and stop commenting when yo have NO CLUE what you're talking about. Live in a Communist country where you are told what to think and believe and see the difference. So, once again, no one is forcing anything upon you ...STUPID!!!! Try not to use expletives if you can, loser.
abbyguy 2 years ago
@abbyguy that dude has a point. Many people of religious backgrounds tend to force people. Just look at Islam and Christianity.
Now, this video is great. Metaphysics is the truth in itself.
IxKnow 2 years ago 8
@IxKnow: I know what you're saying but my point is this, they can TRY to force us but we don't have to do anything we don't want to do. In dictatorials countries where they tell you what to think and do they can only have policies and try to enforce them, the decision to heed or reject thiose policies is the personal freedom we all have regardless of the consequences. IE: Islam may terrorize us but we all still have a choice as to what we want to do and believe in the end. We all have freewill.
abbyguy 1 year ago
ery intersting, but that some sort of cult they have for the cientific methode is very limiting.
thetenet 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The Bible...John 3 :16"
Quote the christian bible on here one more time and I'll bitchslap your dumb ass.
Religion belongs on the fantasy shelf of your local bookstore, not in a physics forum.
GrowABrainstem 2 years ago