At one point the Federation calls B5 traitors. Are they in league with President Clark or something? Also, why didn't the defense grid go online before the Federation got so close? But anyways, B5 had one distinct advantage over Star Trek. ST does not have defensive weaponry. Besides shields, it's all offensive. B5 uses not only defensive, but offensive weaponry as well.
No way that a galaxy ship as even a slighted chance against a white star. The white star has a much better fighting capability, faster manoeuvres. The Galaxy might be faster with warp 10, but close combat the White Star has the clear advantage.
Works good if you totally ignore scale of the two different sides.
White Stars are not fighters, they are the same size as the Galaxy Class. No way a single photon torpedo would finish an undamaged White Star considering they have shields as well.
B5 tech > Startrek tech. B5 can't teleport, but when it comes to firepower and weapons they ROFLSTOMP Trek. Jump point insta-kill too. B5 beat a race with shields, so the shield argument is getting old.
Vorlon and Shadow tech? Adaptive armor and molecular slicer beams. This wouldn't even be a fight.
@bldude2 It doesn't not matter. Trek can't defeat the Shadows, or the Vorlons, or the 3rd space aliens, or the "Hand," or the 1st Ones. All those races are superior to the federation, and even the Borg. In an all out battle Babylon 5's universe would win. People aren't doing the crossovers correctly that's all it is.
You know the 3rd aliens destroyed an entire universe. Not a galaxy, a universe. They have shields and hypnosis mind control too. Let's see trek do that.
@QuantumNova But will all the races of the babylon 5 universe unite just to destroy 24th century Starfleet? If it was Earthforce vs Starfleet, I'm fairly sure that Starfleet will win,
You know, the Daleks developed a weapon that (if not for the Doctor) would have destroyed every Universe, not just the one they were in. They have crazy shields and time travel. they have not, to my knowledge, attempted mind control, but thats mostly because their guns get them what they want. I'm sorry, I'm a Whovian, and all of Doctor Who's races are overpowered :P
@Idazmi7 It doesn't matter, you are still wrong. 31.7 gigatons is not canon data. There for it's invalid. You can state it all day it will still be invalid. Strangely out of the 12 years I studied trek you are 1st person ever to state "photon torpedoes are 31.7 Gigatons." If they were every ship on trek would be killed with one hit, even with shields up.
Learn canon data dude. Google: photon torpedo maximum yield.
@Idazmi7 SD net use mainly ICS data aka C-canon. SD net is an extremely bias site, it does do what ever to make starwars look strongest, even Lie and back it up with false data & useless numbers. G-canon data overrides just about everything stated on SD net. G-canon is the original Starwars movies or novels. G > C. SD net did list trek's official stats based on the show, novels and the creator.
Fans site do estimates based on what they see. That doesn't mean their numbers are Official.
@Idazmi7 Great, but the ones in Babylon 5 are more powerful. I can list only one ship that survived a Shadow Death-Ray (aka molecular slicer beam). The "Vorlon drednaught." It still took heavy damage, and it had Shields/Adaptive bio armor.
The minimum output of a shadow Death-Ray is 64 megatons a second, the maximum has to be above 900 gigatons a second according to screen evidence. It did level an entire Narn colony in 2.1 seconds. The maximum fire output was never stated. (no one knows.)
U are fool. in this video i so firstly about 4 cruisers from babylon 5 vs 10+++ i think it was battle 10 vs 30 ships... also u telling Star trek is more high tech than Babylon 5
come one. Vorlons race are milion year old. Shadow race even older. Shadow vessel cut Star trek ships without any problems. Star trek tech is at least 100. While babylon 5 races have bilion year old tech. Also planet killers in B5... Sorry but babylon is far better then Star Trek.
To be accurate star fleet vessels are faster then that.and their weapons would do more damage and where is their shields. The excalibur looses power for one minute from memory after their main cannons fire. I love Sci fi but please be accurate. but I did love it never the less.
@therapists Borg can over come shadows, Star trek is more high tech than Babylon 5. The only thing Star trek can't match are the psychic mind readers.
This is from Star Wreck - In The Pirkinning ... do a search on that title for the trailer ... a Finnish film parody made by ST fans ... amazing SPFX considering it was all done for this film w/o any connection to the ST or B5.
At one point the Federation calls B5 traitors. Are they in league with President Clark or something? Also, why didn't the defense grid go online before the Federation got so close? But anyways, B5 had one distinct advantage over Star Trek. ST does not have defensive weaponry. Besides shields, it's all offensive. B5 uses not only defensive, but offensive weaponry as well.
JoeHooker11 2 days ago
No way that a galaxy ship as even a slighted chance against a white star. The white star has a much better fighting capability, faster manoeuvres. The Galaxy might be faster with warp 10, but close combat the White Star has the clear advantage.
Nicely done..I like the music, who is it?
Nonvaio01 3 days ago
Interesting interpretation.
Works good if you totally ignore scale of the two different sides.
White Stars are not fighters, they are the same size as the Galaxy Class. No way a single photon torpedo would finish an undamaged White Star considering they have shields as well.
Video looks good though. Nice work.
Razorwing67 3 days ago
It´s more of "Starfleet VS Earth alliance" battle with the unclusion of some white star ships.
JAGTHEGEMINI 1 month ago
Destroy WhiteStar with single shot? Hah!
Muxaull 1 month ago
that's what happend when you make a video of star trek VS babylon 5 without seeng ST
Wesyan1999 1 month ago
@Wesyan1999 To be honest they didn't see Babylon 5 either.
QuantumNova 1 month ago
This is from the finish movie Star Wreck!
B5 would be at a terrible disadvantage without shields!
Except White Star class ships offcourse!
TheShadowwolf88 2 months ago
I thought only starwars fans were dense and blinded by false data...
QuantumNova 2 months ago
DONT COPY STAR WRECK U IDIOT!
kristiankultakristi 2 months ago
You just CANNOT own Starfleet!
8sdbv 2 months ago
I would team up Shadow + Borg (or dommies only one race though) VS Vorlons + Star Fleet (and their allies)
pimpjuice739 3 months ago
B5 tech > Startrek tech. B5 can't teleport, but when it comes to firepower and weapons they ROFLSTOMP Trek. Jump point insta-kill too. B5 beat a race with shields, so the shield argument is getting old.
Vorlon and Shadow tech? Adaptive armor and molecular slicer beams. This wouldn't even be a fight.
QuantumNova 3 months ago
@QuantumNova Hilariously, every fiction crossover I've read between the two have Star Trek tech being firmly superior. :\
bldude2 3 months ago
@bldude2 It doesn't not matter. Trek can't defeat the Shadows, or the Vorlons, or the 3rd space aliens, or the "Hand," or the 1st Ones. All those races are superior to the federation, and even the Borg. In an all out battle Babylon 5's universe would win. People aren't doing the crossovers correctly that's all it is.
You know the 3rd aliens destroyed an entire universe. Not a galaxy, a universe. They have shields and hypnosis mind control too. Let's see trek do that.
QuantumNova 2 months ago
@QuantumNova But will all the races of the babylon 5 universe unite just to destroy 24th century Starfleet? If it was Earthforce vs Starfleet, I'm fairly sure that Starfleet will win,
bldude2 2 months ago
You know, the Daleks developed a weapon that (if not for the Doctor) would have destroyed every Universe, not just the one they were in. They have crazy shields and time travel. they have not, to my knowledge, attempted mind control, but thats mostly because their guns get them what they want. I'm sorry, I'm a Whovian, and all of Doctor Who's races are overpowered :P
notablegoat 2 months ago
@notablegoat LOL Got that right! the Daleks look like Artoo Detoo with a ray gun attached, and ONE can take on a planet!
Idazmi7 2 months ago
@Idazmi7 Dang straight! Allon-sy!
notablegoat 1 month ago
@notablegoat What's Allon-sy?
Idazmi7 1 month ago
@notablegoat What's Allon-sy?
Idazmi7 1 month ago
@notablegoat One question: what's Allon-sy?
Idazmi7 1 month ago
@Idazmi7 The 10th Doctor's catch phrase! You stictly an Classic-Who fan, then?
notablegoat 3 weeks ago
@notablegoat Oh. I emjoy Dr. Who, but I don't watch it that often.
Idazmi7 3 weeks ago
@QuantumNova Reconsider your numbers: Photon Torpedos are 31.4 gigaton each, and the Enterprise D has rapid fire capability.
Idazmi7 2 months ago
@Idazmi7 The official canon numbers are no higher than 63.9 megatons for photon torpedoes. Says so in any official Star Trek book, database, or site.
QuantumNova 2 months ago
@QuantumNova Actually, it's 31.7 Gigatons, andthe Borg have Molecular cutter beams (Shadow Death-Ray) annd "Megatons" don't cut.
Learn science, dude.
Idazmi7 2 months ago
@Idazmi7 It doesn't matter, you are still wrong. 31.7 gigatons is not canon data. There for it's invalid. You can state it all day it will still be invalid. Strangely out of the 12 years I studied trek you are 1st person ever to state "photon torpedoes are 31.7 Gigatons." If they were every ship on trek would be killed with one hit, even with shields up.
Learn canon data dude. Google: photon torpedo maximum yield.
QuantumNova 2 months ago
@QuantumNova
picard578.hostoi.com/startrek-vs-starwars/star_trek/index[dot]html
Try again.
Idazmi7 2 months ago
@Idazmi7 your link is broken. I know [dot] = . Most likely it's non canon anyway.
Here you go. Just read it.
[Double U Double U Double U] [dot]stardestroyer[dot]net/Empire/Tech/Torpedoes/Torpedo1[dot]html
It's canon data with proof.
QuantumNova 2 months ago
@QuantumNova Stardestroyer net is about Star Wars kicking Star Trek. Their Star Wars info is legit, their Star Trek "evidence" is not.
Idazmi7 2 months ago
@Idazmi7 SD net use mainly ICS data aka C-canon. SD net is an extremely bias site, it does do what ever to make starwars look strongest, even Lie and back it up with false data & useless numbers. G-canon data overrides just about everything stated on SD net. G-canon is the original Starwars movies or novels. G > C. SD net did list trek's official stats based on the show, novels and the creator.
Fans site do estimates based on what they see. That doesn't mean their numbers are Official.
QuantumNova 2 months ago
@QuantumNova I know. What little work they show is legit, except turbolasers, from which they base ALL of their overstated crap.
I'm pro Star Trek as far as THAT argument goes, but I like Star Wars' G-canon.
/watch?v=0SQl4B5411k
/watch?v=KYNWRqaevpI
/watch?v=8kFG2otp2YI - My references for why SD [dot] net is overpowered fanwank
(And for why my argument is totally valid)
Idazmi7 2 months ago
@QuantumNova "Adaptive armor and molecular slicer beams. This wouldn't even be a fight."
Star Trek has both.
Idazmi7 2 months ago
@Idazmi7 Great, but the ones in Babylon 5 are more powerful. I can list only one ship that survived a Shadow Death-Ray (aka molecular slicer beam). The "Vorlon drednaught." It still took heavy damage, and it had Shields/Adaptive bio armor.
The minimum output of a shadow Death-Ray is 64 megatons a second, the maximum has to be above 900 gigatons a second according to screen evidence. It did level an entire Narn colony in 2.1 seconds. The maximum fire output was never stated. (no one knows.)
QuantumNova 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Babylon 5 Millions of years of tech vs. a few centuries of cyber
shoplifting... In Star Trek.
ForgotenPhoenix 3 months ago
U are fool. in this video i so firstly about 4 cruisers from babylon 5 vs 10+++ i think it was battle 10 vs 30 ships... also u telling Star trek is more high tech than Babylon 5
come one. Vorlons race are milion year old. Shadow race even older. Shadow vessel cut Star trek ships without any problems. Star trek tech is at least 100. While babylon 5 races have bilion year old tech. Also planet killers in B5... Sorry but babylon is far better then Star Trek.
ForgotenPhoenix 3 months ago
@ForgotenPhoenix Ignoring all but the B5 planet killers, not exactly a valid argument since Star Trek races have planet destroying weapons as well...
bldude2 2 months ago
did u make it
borgCube100 4 months ago
great !!!!
can i have some parts for a music video ? please call me !!!!
voltago68 4 months ago
To be accurate star fleet vessels are faster then that.and their weapons would do more damage and where is their shields. The excalibur looses power for one minute from memory after their main cannons fire. I love Sci fi but please be accurate. but I did love it never the less.
Hades2000 4 months ago
Whats with the silly ship names and subtitles <.<
zmaj54 4 months ago
@zmaj54 it's a finish movie.
Watch Star Wreck in the Pirinning
Soldierlozer 4 months ago
How about the Borg verses the Shadows? that seems to be a better fight
crytapusta 5 months ago
@therapists Borg can over come shadows, Star trek is more high tech than Babylon 5. The only thing Star trek can't match are the psychic mind readers.
makemap 4 months ago
Sovereing hade to die? -.-
fio366 10 months ago
This is from Star Wreck - In The Pirkinning ... do a search on that title for the trailer ... a Finnish film parody made by ST fans ... amazing SPFX considering it was all done for this film w/o any connection to the ST or B5.
tend2it 11 months ago
This really is quite amazing. How did you do it? Was listening to music while watching this so had the audio muted. Sound effects would be nice.
TheFluxMachine 1 year ago