This sounds a bit like Corelli, but without the lame factor. Imho Locatelli was a far greater genius than Corelli, Albinoni and Vivaldi combined. Hard to understand how he could have been so dearly forgotten. It probably proves that the most talented ones don't necessarily become the big names. Locatelli's music is beyond description.
@voxhunden I agree on all except Vivaldi. True Locatelli might have been a superior violinist (I would say they were equals, as Vivaldi was called "The Madman" by his students for his intense and complicated solo's), but Vivaldi captures something more with his music, La Tempesta di Mare - A storm at sea, the Four Seasons - obvious, Il gardellino - a gold finch, Il Cucu - a cuckoo bird, and the list goes on. I like Locatelli, but I do not think he is a greater genius than Vivaldi. Equals at best
@Mercer1012 You're right, Locatelli and Vivaldi are as much the same as Van Gogh and Renoir - very different. To me personally, all of Vivaldi's music sounds like a dance, but also (or: and therefore) as more of the same, while Locatelli sounds like a Russian storyteller - always very different, and never failing to drag me in. A matter of taste I guess. I probably like stories more than dance:)
@voxhunden I never said they were the same, far from it. Vivaldi's have often been compared to dances, or as "playful" but I like his nearly incessant use of the descending sequence. :) Vivaldi's concerti are very different as well, while he uses similar cadences and other musical schemes, that is because it is his trademark. Locatelli has a trademark if you listen carefully enough as does Mozart and Haydn. Vivaldi also wrote for FAR more combinations of instruments than Locatelli.
@Mercer1012 Of course, Vivaldi was VASTLY more productive than Locatelli, and of bigger stature in his time as well. And every artist works within the framework of (a) the achievements of their time, (b) their own imagination and (c) what their audience are willing to accept, so each has their trademark. Still, within his limited production and framework, to me personally Locatelli has a lot more to say than Vivaldi. Art either touches you or it doesn't. Locatelli does for me. Very much:)
@voxhunden I never downed Locatelli I think he is one of the masters, but it is impossible to say who is superior. If we went by who was most popular during the time, then Corelli would have blown all of the Italians, Locatelli, Vivaldi, Geminani, Albinoni, Tartini, etc, out of the water. His music was of "unparalleled influence". I, for one, do not care for Corelli particularly, so I do agree that it is your own personal opinion, I was just surprised you dismissed so many masters so casually.
For some reason, often times, for me the basso continuo really makes the piece or breaks it. I love the continuo in this concerto. Interesting that they use an organ instead of a harpsichord (at least that's what is sounds like).
Many Baroque pieces do indeed use the pipe organ instead of the harpsichord, sometimes both. It depends on the time a place the piece will be performed... most of the time.
POUR TOI :)
sENoZ93 2 months ago
My hunger for great music is satisfied for a while :D
Max0Inq 1 year ago
This sounds a bit like Corelli, but without the lame factor. Imho Locatelli was a far greater genius than Corelli, Albinoni and Vivaldi combined. Hard to understand how he could have been so dearly forgotten. It probably proves that the most talented ones don't necessarily become the big names. Locatelli's music is beyond description.
voxhunden 1 year ago
@voxhunden I agree on all except Vivaldi. True Locatelli might have been a superior violinist (I would say they were equals, as Vivaldi was called "The Madman" by his students for his intense and complicated solo's), but Vivaldi captures something more with his music, La Tempesta di Mare - A storm at sea, the Four Seasons - obvious, Il gardellino - a gold finch, Il Cucu - a cuckoo bird, and the list goes on. I like Locatelli, but I do not think he is a greater genius than Vivaldi. Equals at best
Mercer1012 7 months ago
@Mercer1012 You're right, Locatelli and Vivaldi are as much the same as Van Gogh and Renoir - very different. To me personally, all of Vivaldi's music sounds like a dance, but also (or: and therefore) as more of the same, while Locatelli sounds like a Russian storyteller - always very different, and never failing to drag me in. A matter of taste I guess. I probably like stories more than dance:)
voxhunden 7 months ago
@voxhunden I never said they were the same, far from it. Vivaldi's have often been compared to dances, or as "playful" but I like his nearly incessant use of the descending sequence. :) Vivaldi's concerti are very different as well, while he uses similar cadences and other musical schemes, that is because it is his trademark. Locatelli has a trademark if you listen carefully enough as does Mozart and Haydn. Vivaldi also wrote for FAR more combinations of instruments than Locatelli.
Mercer1012 7 months ago
@Mercer1012 Of course, Vivaldi was VASTLY more productive than Locatelli, and of bigger stature in his time as well. And every artist works within the framework of (a) the achievements of their time, (b) their own imagination and (c) what their audience are willing to accept, so each has their trademark. Still, within his limited production and framework, to me personally Locatelli has a lot more to say than Vivaldi. Art either touches you or it doesn't. Locatelli does for me. Very much:)
voxhunden 7 months ago
@voxhunden I never downed Locatelli I think he is one of the masters, but it is impossible to say who is superior. If we went by who was most popular during the time, then Corelli would have blown all of the Italians, Locatelli, Vivaldi, Geminani, Albinoni, Tartini, etc, out of the water. His music was of "unparalleled influence". I, for one, do not care for Corelli particularly, so I do agree that it is your own personal opinion, I was just surprised you dismissed so many masters so casually.
Mercer1012 7 months ago
@Mercer1012 Yes, mea culpa:)
voxhunden 7 months ago
Fantástico !!
arquivosevideos 2 years ago
For some reason, often times, for me the basso continuo really makes the piece or breaks it. I love the continuo in this concerto. Interesting that they use an organ instead of a harpsichord (at least that's what is sounds like).
requiemaeturnum 2 years ago
Many Baroque pieces do indeed use the pipe organ instead of the harpsichord, sometimes both. It depends on the time a place the piece will be performed... most of the time.
CminorMaxG 1 year ago
sublime... this piece has beautiful violin
urbanguerrillamao 2 years ago
Does anyone knows how to get the music score of this piece?
:) Gracias !!!
roxutube 3 years ago
Simply Beautiful! Thank you for posting
RobotHank1 3 years ago
Thank you! This is a beautiful set of music!
Is the painting the composer himself? ..Looks like he is interested in various things!
sweetviolet1000 3 years ago
Actually the man in the background is a self-portrait of the painter Edwart Collier. Painted in 1684, so about a generation or so before Locatelli.
HARMONICO101 3 years ago