Don't see how this is fake! The kits of the players are from that era and that's how turf moor looked back then and they can't just rebuild the turf and everything around it..... Love this old footage, just something about it makes you love it :)
@FGaribay7 Thank you - that's a great compliment to the BFI National Archive's restoration team! The reason why the quality is surprisingly good is that the original camera negative still exists. Most early films only survive in badly damaged screening copies - but if the negative survives in reasonably good shape (this one has some chemical decay), the image quality of newly-struck prints will be excellent. After all, 35mm film offers a higher resolution image than high-definition video.
@FGaribay7 You're right, it's fake. Me and some friends carefully reconstructed a turn-of-the-century football ground, researched design, advertising billboards etc, but the hardest part was the costumes. We had to commission 500 period costumes for the crowd along with the repro cotton football kits and boots. We added the smoke towers etc in the background post-production. The budget was huge, but we feel it was worthwhile for this low key re-enactment.
@FGaribay7 not a fake, theres a photo of that old turf moor stadium in the burnley museum. have a look at some of the other films BFI have restored that are of even better quality and try telling me they`re fakes too! its great to watch these old films, how the world we live in has changed in such a short time.
pretty sure that the UTD goalkeeper at the end is Harry Moger, pretty noticeable due to being 6'3" tall as players were generally a bit shorter then. he only joined Utd in 1903 yep i think its the date on the video is wrong; still over 100 years though, amazing
This is fantastic! Just wish it was earler as my Great Grandfather William Tait played for Newton Heath back in 1887. I have a cup he won for a dribbling contest.
Well maybe there's alot of money going on today. But I prefer the football of today than this one. Today football is more populair, with better players and more speed in the game itself.
It sounded to me like 'Burt' Utd or 'Dirt' Utd! I don't think either is right, especially the second one. I'll have a check in one of my railway books at a later date, maybe I'll find something there. Also refers to them being called Newton Heath, which was the Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway workshops, where Man U originated from.
@decorativeedison I've decided in light of new evidence that the date of 1902 is right after all. Apparently Burnley adopted thier green kit earlier than thought, in 1900. Also, a team photo of United from 1902 shows them wearing shirts with white collars and socks with light bands, just like they are wearing in the clip. They do not wear that kit in any other season. The man stood to the side as the players emerge is James West.
Does that not look like Sandy Turnbull as the United Players come out onto the pitch? And Ernest Mangnall leading them out? Neither of those two were at United in 1902.
Also the pitch markings are post 1902 and the golakeeper appears to be wearing a different shirt to the outfield players (this only started to happen around 1909). United seem to be wearing black socks, which they did not do until around 1908...?
That's a brief explanation why people say they hate United, it's because they haven't got a fucking clue what they're talking about, and deep down they wish they were United. now you know why we call little city supporters the LIARS, why we call Liverpool supporters Filth and Leeds SCUM. and now you now why every trophy we win feels extra special knowing the whole ABU nation is squirming inside and want to scream.
Another reason why people say they hate United is because they blame them for football becoming too commercial, Now try explaining to these people that Liverpool were the first to have sponsors on there shirts and opened the door to all this commecialisation and they will look at you like they're Mentally challenged and put their fingers in their ears so they don't have to listen to the truth, because that's not what they want to hear. So they're you go marvy118, cont-
But the real reason alot of clubs hate United is because during the late 60's, 70's and 80's they had the largest away following in Britain, known as the Red Army, and it wasn't uncommon for these supporters to tear towns apart when they played there, and they would also give other supporters a good kicking in the process. now im not saying they didn't get a dose of their own medicine at times because they did, but on a whole they made other supporters look like twats. cont-
and the world as well and you can start to see the jealousy that they have to put up with. teams like City, Liverpool and Leeds have also spent decades mocking the deaths of the Busby Babes who died in a plane crash in 1958, because they are so jealous that they will never be as famous as Man Utd, even before the disaster United had the largest crowds in the country, but City being so bitter tried to make people believe the only reason people loved United was because of the tragedy. cont-
marvy1118, United aren't hated by people in Manchester, they're hated by manchester city supporters because United cast a shadow over them so big that nobody knows who they're. they're outnumbered by United supporters in every part of Manchester and try to lie to people about this, a recent survey done by a university showed that United had the largest number of local season ticket holders in the premiership, add to that United also have a huge support from all over the British Isles. cont-
The late great Billy meredith would of played in this game as he switched allegiance from Manchester City for a small fee ( i think it was for a few pints of ale and some tobacco).
I'm and American and I've learned it seems that Man United is quite hated by Manchester, even though they are a winning team. Can someone tell me why?
because of manchester city which are another team in manchster.....united and city are rivals and there are fans in manchster that hate united because they are a winning team simple because they are jelous
suppose you love Spurs and Chelsea then Westhamlad123 ?!? people don't just dislike United because of their success bit more to it than that to be fair
should have put that better The Star Stand on the one side The Brunshaw Lane stand on the other...terraced house should look familiar as its still there!
Don't see how this is fake! The kits of the players are from that era and that's how turf moor looked back then and they can't just rebuild the turf and everything around it..... Love this old footage, just something about it makes you love it :)
adam4bfc 6 months ago
4p for a flake!
randygland 6 months ago
i see Sir Alex Ferguson in the bench
Ch1charitO14 7 months ago
wow,,not much has changed
nirvgardengod 8 months ago
fantastic footage.
314WESTERN 8 months ago
LOL Giggs's debut. Terrible reporter's voice. You'll go far on the BBC.
Kevin107ish 11 months ago
I think this is fake, the video quallity is too good for something recored over 100 years ago.
FGaribay7 11 months ago
@FGaribay7 Thank you - that's a great compliment to the BFI National Archive's restoration team! The reason why the quality is surprisingly good is that the original camera negative still exists. Most early films only survive in badly damaged screening copies - but if the negative survives in reasonably good shape (this one has some chemical decay), the image quality of newly-struck prints will be excellent. After all, 35mm film offers a higher resolution image than high-definition video.
BFIfilms 11 months ago 15
@BFIfilms Theres no need for thanks I was just stating my own personal opinion as to whether this is actual footage or a reenactment
FGaribay7 11 months ago
@FGaribay7 You're right, it's fake. Me and some friends carefully reconstructed a turn-of-the-century football ground, researched design, advertising billboards etc, but the hardest part was the costumes. We had to commission 500 period costumes for the crowd along with the repro cotton football kits and boots. We added the smoke towers etc in the background post-production. The budget was huge, but we feel it was worthwhile for this low key re-enactment.
yellowfolder 8 months ago
@FGaribay7 not a fake, theres a photo of that old turf moor stadium in the burnley museum. have a look at some of the other films BFI have restored that are of even better quality and try telling me they`re fakes too! its great to watch these old films, how the world we live in has changed in such a short time.
tokyohands 4 months ago
Simply stunning! thanks for posting.
sintitulo 1 year ago
Wonderfull to see Turfmoor I will always love it
burnley5960 1 year ago
Wonder if Alex Ferguson went to this game lol
AlbertzRfc72 1 year ago
MU got 7 minutes of injury time even back then? What a travesty!
CL6120 1 year ago
Ryan Giggs Making his debut
Kirranium 1 year ago 36
@Kirranium LMAOOOOOO!!!!!!
Stylus1997 1 year ago
@Kirranium XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
szmako 1 year ago
@Kirranium
Hahahahahahahaha.
You have a spirit. ;)
snowbeach1981 4 months ago
Ooh I remember this one, it was Giggs' first match!
MrXtremie 1 year ago
And for viewers in black & white, Burnley are wearing their famous green shirts!
AndrzejVillan 1 year ago
Ryan Giggs chyba już grał ;)
LisuPL 1 year ago
Long live Man-United!!!
49ERSiBleed 2 years ago 4
Never ever must Burnley leave Turfmoor,for me its the greatest ground ever no question
burnley5960 2 years ago
Has anybody noticed the people in the background they are really big compared to the other people in the film.
99corrigan 2 years ago
nice bit of history
claret1882uk 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Quality service from your channel, as always.
minutegongcoughs 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The truth about the Mitchell and Kenyon Film find is incorrect you can find the full facts at the Gregory Audio Visual Website under "News Tab"
magicmomentsvideo 2 years ago
pretty sure that the UTD goalkeeper at the end is Harry Moger, pretty noticeable due to being 6'3" tall as players were generally a bit shorter then. he only joined Utd in 1903 yep i think its the date on the video is wrong; still over 100 years though, amazing
PAD73 2 years ago
This is 1907 the second last player running out is Charlie Roberts and the fifth player is defiantly Billy Meredith why is this being said as 1902.
Greg2cool 2 years ago
@Greg2cool We never played Burnley in 1907
adz14000 1 year ago
This is fantastic! Just wish it was earler as my Great Grandfather William Tait played for Newton Heath back in 1887. I have a cup he won for a dribbling contest.
Darkness2168 2 years ago
Is this definately 1902?
The fifth player to run out looks very much like Billy Meredith,who didnt sign for United until 1906.
crystaltipps04 2 years ago
picture cristiano ronaldo playing in that time
Chaitat19 2 years ago
For ten bob a game?
BillDFC 2 years ago
wanna be football team? we have now beat all of the 'big 4' teams.
ashymacmahon 2 years ago
Burnley has always been better than Manchester United.
football0698 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
burnley is just a piss ant wanna-be "football team"
chriso1434 2 years ago
i just saw scholes and giggs in that video... pause it at 0:37
dezertpenguin 2 years ago
lol
init its definatly giigs not sure about schools thhough
liverPool1234565 2 years ago
united just lost to burnley this time!!!
metroarsenalman 2 years ago
United web site says: attendance 4000.
Scorers Pegg and OG.
Date: Dec 6 1902.
peterdcarter1 2 years ago
this is when football was a mans game and money had nothing to do with football.
Boysoldier94119 2 years ago 20
@Boysoldier94119 well said boy soldier
KaikeeKookie 1 year ago
@Boysoldier94119
Well maybe there's alot of money going on today. But I prefer the football of today than this one. Today football is more populair, with better players and more speed in the game itself.
MrXtremie 1 year ago
@Boysoldier94119
One thing you can't deny is that football is a much more addicting game to look at compared to that year.
MrXtremie 2 months ago
Nobodies wearing black shorts!
Eamonnceannt 2 years ago
Also, Burnley are in their green shirts with black shorts, which they only wore from around 1908-1910.
This match is more likely to be either United's 3-2 win on 10th March 1909 or Burnley's 2-0 win on 15th January 1910.
decorativeedison 2 years ago 2
Of course, I meant to type "Burnley are in their green shirts with black SOCKS"...
decorativeedison 2 years ago
The narrator said the commentaters often referred to them as ???? United.......could you please tell me what she said....thanks.
crystaltipps04 2 years ago
It sounded to me like 'Burt' Utd or 'Dirt' Utd! I don't think either is right, especially the second one. I'll have a check in one of my railway books at a later date, maybe I'll find something there. Also refers to them being called Newton Heath, which was the Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway workshops, where Man U originated from.
superjono2 2 years ago
She says "The" United.
decorativeedison 2 years ago 5
@decorativeedison After all there is only one.
BertAtkin 1 year ago
THE United? ..... I think !!
lancsy500 2 years ago
dirt! yes dirt thats what you are
anthonyc3po 2 years ago
Why are ppl arguing on here ??
Isnt their a video where you idiots can throw insults at each other elswhere?
crystaltipps04 2 years ago 2
'THE UNITED' as opposed to 'Manchester United'
Waxthumper 2 years ago
we wore Green between 1900 and 1910 plain Red shirts before that and Claret with Blue sleeves from September 1910 onwards
ralphtheclaret 2 years ago
@decorativeedison I've decided in light of new evidence that the date of 1902 is right after all. Apparently Burnley adopted thier green kit earlier than thought, in 1900. Also, a team photo of United from 1902 shows them wearing shirts with white collars and socks with light bands, just like they are wearing in the clip. They do not wear that kit in any other season. The man stood to the side as the players emerge is James West.
decorativeedison 1 year ago
The date dosn't seem right to me.
Does that not look like Sandy Turnbull as the United Players come out onto the pitch? And Ernest Mangnall leading them out? Neither of those two were at United in 1902.
Also the pitch markings are post 1902 and the golakeeper appears to be wearing a different shirt to the outfield players (this only started to happen around 1909). United seem to be wearing black socks, which they did not do until around 1908...?
decorativeedison 2 years ago
That's a brief explanation why people say they hate United, it's because they haven't got a fucking clue what they're talking about, and deep down they wish they were United. now you know why we call little city supporters the LIARS, why we call Liverpool supporters Filth and Leeds SCUM. and now you now why every trophy we win feels extra special knowing the whole ABU nation is squirming inside and want to scream.
Dogstar333 2 years ago 2
Fuckin hell, spot on mate
Ordsall66 2 years ago 3
Another reason why people say they hate United is because they blame them for football becoming too commercial, Now try explaining to these people that Liverpool were the first to have sponsors on there shirts and opened the door to all this commecialisation and they will look at you like they're Mentally challenged and put their fingers in their ears so they don't have to listen to the truth, because that's not what they want to hear. So they're you go marvy118, cont-
Dogstar333 2 years ago 3
But the real reason alot of clubs hate United is because during the late 60's, 70's and 80's they had the largest away following in Britain, known as the Red Army, and it wasn't uncommon for these supporters to tear towns apart when they played there, and they would also give other supporters a good kicking in the process. now im not saying they didn't get a dose of their own medicine at times because they did, but on a whole they made other supporters look like twats. cont-
Dogstar333 2 years ago 3
and the world as well and you can start to see the jealousy that they have to put up with. teams like City, Liverpool and Leeds have also spent decades mocking the deaths of the Busby Babes who died in a plane crash in 1958, because they are so jealous that they will never be as famous as Man Utd, even before the disaster United had the largest crowds in the country, but City being so bitter tried to make people believe the only reason people loved United was because of the tragedy. cont-
Dogstar333 2 years ago 3
marvy1118, United aren't hated by people in Manchester, they're hated by manchester city supporters because United cast a shadow over them so big that nobody knows who they're. they're outnumbered by United supporters in every part of Manchester and try to lie to people about this, a recent survey done by a university showed that United had the largest number of local season ticket holders in the premiership, add to that United also have a huge support from all over the British Isles. cont-
Dogstar333 2 years ago 5
The late great Billy meredith would of played in this game as he switched allegiance from Manchester City for a small fee ( i think it was for a few pints of ale and some tobacco).
crystaltipps04 2 years ago
I'm and American and I've learned it seems that Man United is quite hated by Manchester, even though they are a winning team. Can someone tell me why?
marvy1118 2 years ago
because of manchester city which are another team in manchster.....united and city are rivals and there are fans in manchster that hate united because they are a winning team simple because they are jelous
westhamlad123 2 years ago 3
suppose you love Spurs and Chelsea then Westhamlad123 ?!? people don't just dislike United because of their success bit more to it than that to be fair
ralphtheclaret 2 years ago
Is this the first video of Burnley too?
Nice to show Man United's younger fans the real history of their second tier football club.
FCAstonVilla 3 years ago
Comment removed
peterdcarter1 2 years ago
No Way is that turf moor. How different it looks now!
jojoe1878 3 years ago
1.04 'worlds most famous club' damn right!
davidsan01 3 years ago
U N I T E D
gravesrus 3 years ago 4
Why so sure, the stands mainley, and the fact the date Burnley couldnt have played Man Utd!
Bad gammer Swift60, i belive its at Plumbstead, where Arsenal played around the time.
claretmaduk 3 years ago
we did play United that day so I've no idea why you would suppose otherwise ? the stand is The Star Stand on Brunshaw Road formerly
owned by Burnley Union Star FC....I am 100%
sure of this !
ralphtheclaret 3 years ago 2
should have put that better The Star Stand on the one side The Brunshaw Lane stand on the other...terraced house should look familiar as its still there!
ralphtheclaret 3 years ago
I agree with you ralphtheclaret, this is Burnley v Manchester United at Burnley. Why is claretmaduk thinking otherwise?
sewitt60 3 years ago
if it was Arsenal which it isn't its Plumstead without a B!
ralphtheclaret 3 years ago
burnley wore green shirts, white shorts and black socks in 1902, united had a white collar so the strips look correct
nvb272 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Its not Burnley, its Plumbstead Arsenal, before they moved to Highbury.
Im 99% sure of this.
claretmaduk 3 years ago
Why so sure?
villa72 3 years ago
Plumbstead Arsenal? You're wrong there, they were called Woolwich Arsenal. And this isn't them.
sewitt60 3 years ago