Added: 1 year ago
From: youpolitics
Views: 1,001
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The OATH to the Sovereign is widely misunderstood. The Sovereign is PERSONALLY LIABLE for the exercise of the Executive powers, even though exercised by others upon due election. The oath of the elected members or of Cabinet to the Sovereign is an implied promise NOT to abuse the powers; meaning not to use the powers for an alien purpose, but only according to law under the Constitution.

  • @crazyforcanada - The Queen by her Coronation Oath promises to govern only according TO LAW; therefore, her Executive, who exercise HER powers, those for which she is personally responsible, must do likewise and thus they swear an oath to the Queen, the person ultimately responsible to CONTROL the Executive in order to prevent abuse of HER powers exercised by them.

  • @crazyforcanada - Did you hear those words, "ACCORDING TO LAW". This is the Executive ECHOING the Queen's own Coronation Oath. That's the link. There are TWO OATHS operative here, to protect the nation and the people. The Queen's oath, and the oath of her Executive to her. They are interlocking oaths to respect the RULE OF LAW. If the people understood this, they might learn to control their governments more effectively.

  • Did Clegg 'declare and affirm' rather than swear? What is the constitutional basis for this?

  • @baresolid: It came from some people not wanting to swear by God.

  • Hello youpolitics.

    Thank you providing the Oath. Did anyone catch the fact that not one of those persons that were declaring and making affirmations of true allegiance to Her Majesty according to Law were able to do so without reading the Script?

    Coming complete circle I guess.

    US has 300m in the hands of 500 or so. What would happen if the 300m realized that they are actually freemasons or desendents of freemasons...

    Here in Canada, we just realized that We are a Constituional Monarchy.

  • @MultiMindra - "reading the script" would be a precaution in view of the issue of illegality of an oath that is not word-for-word according the statute prescribing the oath. If the affiant tried to memorize the oath and flubbed a word, or changed the order of the words, or left words out, it would NOT be the oath prescribed by LAW, and it would not be a lawful swearing-in ceremony; and the person would not be lawfully sworn & could not assume their functions.

  • @crazyforcanada - we saw an example of a "slip" on the oath when President Obama was sworn in. He slipped more than once: in the public ceremony, and again when he was re-sworn privately, so he had to be re-sworn again until he got it right. Otherwise, all other things being in order, he would not lawfully be in office.

  • It is because the PRIVATE OATH of FREEMASONRY takes precedence to the PUBLIC OATH of POLITICIANS & JUDGES - therefore: BANKING, POLITICS, LAW, CENTRAL Government, LOCAL Govt, BUSINESS, MEDIA, ACADEMIA etc protect their "Brethren" - yet this fact is NEVER admitted Publicly...

    The Media NEVER refer to issues of FREEMASONRY... if they do, the Presenters refer in terms of "CONSPIRATOLOGY"; "MARGINALISATION" and "RIDICULE" - the Viewers tend to just "accept" what the "trusted" Presenter asserts

  • @youpolitics - what is the wording of the oath taken in freemasonry? Do you know? Thanks.

  • Did John Bercow just give David Cameron the most blatant masonic handshake I've ever seen? Extraordinary slip.

  • Are you aware that the CABINET as members of the PRIVY COUNCIL are ALL obliged to swear another Oath?

    BUT the reason JamesPipper to your EXCELLENT observation - does it NOT lie in the fact that they swear another PRIVATE Oath to FREEMASONRY - the Cult - Religion - to LUCIFER!!! [The "Light" = Light of "LUCIFER" - look up p. 321 of "MORALS & DOGMA" by Albert PIKE [SGIG (33) - where the Great Secret of FREEMASONRY is exposed for ALL to read - but how many carefully read his authoritative text?]

  • God save the Queen. If only these members of cabinet actually followed the oaths they have taken.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more