I find it very interesting that everyone is so obsessed over Anita. The software aspect is far more intriguing but all most of us can see is the world through the prism of our circumstance. So we can only look at the people and not the larger point the software makes about evolution.
A brilliant example. A pair that would manage to cooperate, will eventually be able to get 6 per iteration, while the other - 4-5. IRL the price of cooperation is even greater.
In this game, crime doesn't pay, all programmes are equal. That isn't the same in nature where some programmes are extroidinary and only expect the extroidinary from themselves, as healthy human beings should.
She is such a fucking idiot, like i was actually enraged at how stupid she is/was shouting at my screen lol.. to me to solution couldnt be more obvious ... but i guess some people are either to sceptical or are just to dumb
when they went c/d the next round should have been d/c then its would have gone c/c c/c c/c as they would be on the same page,, or so i would have thought.
when they went c/d the next round should have been d/c then its would have gone c/c c/c c/c as they would be on the same page,, so so i would have thought.
If theres no real prize why would you ever be so selfish? I would of happily sat there and got the admiration of Dawkins for writing a C everytime. Anita would have 4 pound but she'd also be a cunt.
I know the optimal strategy for the game! First, find someone to play who you know will always cooperate (perhaps not so easy). Then you must also choose to cooperate, every time. At the end of the game, however much reward has been won, the TOTAL amount will always be more than if any defects had been played, because it's 6 rewards for a double cooperation and 5 for coop & a defect... Now (this is the best bit) you just steal all the reward for yourself and go have some fun spending it! Haha.
What a stupid fucking bitch. If he does C and she D, the next round should be the opposite both to communicate your willingness to cooperate, and to even out the previous unintended thievery. After both have taken the unfair advantage, the playing field is level and both have signaled their willingness to cooperate, and this is the only logical time to start continuously "c"ing.
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
Adrian did it wrong. He knows that D is the "safe" answer. If you want the other person to switch, you have to give them three Cs in a row after a D. One to say "I don't just pick D every time." One more to say "really, I'm trying to work with you here, this isn't a dumb trick." And a final one because you have to give them a chance to respond with C now that you've set up a pattern. Only giving one C and then backing away can sting the other person if they try to cooperate immediately.
@TheRichardHinckley Not according to the computer simulation where the "Tit for Tat" strategy came out on top by copying the other player's last move. Three C's in a row is going way overboard.
@imok4545 I understand how the program worked, but I'm talking about trying to communicate with another human being. Imagine a program called "Tat For Tit" that is exactly the same as Tit For Tat, but it starts with D instead of C. Faced with Tit For Tat, it would still do OK. They'd each get 5 points every 2 rounds (cheat followed by sucker, over and over). If one of them just put two Cs in a row, they'd each get 6 points every 2 rounds. The idea is to alter Anita's behavior with communication.
She expected him to get screwed over twice before she would think about working together. Then she has the nerve to say she was the one to take the lead lol.
He shouldn't have stopped the game at that moment! He missed a great opportunity to observe what would have happend after Anita finally chose "C". At least Adrian admitted that he would have chosen "C" next to cooperate, but still poor showing from the teacher. I'm pretty sure Dawkins was like WTF at that moment.
Anita's logic is very weird. If Adrian goes C and Anita goes D then she should pay back with C and Adrian takes 4 as he should go D. In next round they should both go for C and win together with equal score.
Isn't that experiment setup kind of flawed considering that while they are not supposed to communicate the pens make clearly audible sounds (e.g. one stroke for C, two for D)?
this experiment has been conducted at least 2 other times before that i can think of (ok i didnt state it that way.....i got that out of my psych book) so the fact that this one experiment is flawed, means nothing, the others were not, they were using computers in diffrent rooms
@Zryuken Is pretty natural that some one would like have a strategy of deceit and cunning to win against someone he shall never deal with again, a stranger. if they were related or were classmates i am sure they would have co-operated more. Thats exactly what Dawkins is trying to explain and you are failing to understand.
@sushanalone How could you possibly claim to know what I understand...? She's deceptive yes, but cunning, I disagree. She was merely being stubborn because she is uncooperative which is not usually a favorable trait in this society. Rather than be cooperative from the start she was skeptical of Adrian's cooperative intention, and while this may have played favorably to her in the short term, I again stress this is not a useful strategy in this society.
This is such a perfect, logical, mathematically sound explanation of how forgiveness and courtesy is the best strategy in life, regardless of your predisposition or religious beliefs. It almost makes me sick to see people suggesting atheism is amoral.
I didn't know Dawkin's subscribed to intelligent design, what's this garbage about a "preplanned cooperative strategy" being necesary to avoid extinction. Get back in our camp Dawson and toe Darwin's line!
You probably missed it, but he explained exactly how preplanned cooperative strategy arises gradually through natural selection. Preplanned strategy devised by survival of the fittest (Darwinian evolution) is very different from invented strategy (intelligently designed strategy).
What a Bitch.
Cdawg3x 3 days ago
Anita tries to screw the other girl then now Adrian, wow what an asshole !
cr4yv3n 1 week ago
Ahahaha!! Floppy discs!
rossplendent 3 weeks ago
Anita is a bitch
meadowsirl 3 weeks ago 2
I find it very interesting that everyone is so obsessed over Anita. The software aspect is far more intriguing but all most of us can see is the world through the prism of our circumstance. So we can only look at the people and not the larger point the software makes about evolution.
robotpanda77 1 month ago
A brilliant example. A pair that would manage to cooperate, will eventually be able to get 6 per iteration, while the other - 4-5. IRL the price of cooperation is even greater.
timfidotru 2 months ago in playlist Другие видео от пользователя dawkinschannel
In this game, crime doesn't pay, all programmes are equal. That isn't the same in nature where some programmes are extroidinary and only expect the extroidinary from themselves, as healthy human beings should.
fredbloggs02 2 months ago
lol the funny thing is, tit for tat was my strategy! open with a C, if they do D, keep doing D, if they ever do C, do a C the next time...
PaladinswordSaurfang 2 months ago
Comment removed
PaladinswordSaurfang 2 months ago
She is such a fucking idiot, like i was actually enraged at how stupid she is/was shouting at my screen lol.. to me to solution couldnt be more obvious ... but i guess some people are either to sceptical or are just to dumb
Breezer1391 2 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
damn this is interesting as shit
Linkmaster4611 3 months ago
There is a pretty obvious flaw in this experimental set-up. You can hear what the other person is writing because of the number of pen strokes.
legshakermaker1968 4 months ago
@legshakermaker1968 It is part of it. The other can outsmart the other part if the part listens closely.
eatbeavers 4 months ago
@legshakermaker1968 right. as a reviewer i would not recommend publication of this study in a journal :)
pimpmypimples 3 months ago
@legshakermaker1968 They're writing them at the same time.
TheSobek 2 months ago
so this is why i suck at spore. I wonder if Dawkins has ever played that.
Piccadillyo 4 months ago
Wow...Anita's strategy is strange indeed.
TeeGeeFan 4 months ago
what do you expect from anita, she's indian
llethaface11 5 months ago
when they went c/d the next round should have been d/c then its would have gone c/c c/c c/c as they would be on the same page,, or so i would have thought.
1rken1nfantry 5 months ago
when they went c/d the next round should have been d/c then its would have gone c/c c/c c/c as they would be on the same page,, so so i would have thought.
1rken1nfantry 5 months ago
i like the fact that anita says she is taking the lead..lol
mikey60264 6 months ago
@mikey60264 how much do you like it?
TheHolyphantom 3 months ago
Paper wastage.
drbuk96 6 months ago
oh, man, floppy disks! :)
astroclast 6 months ago
If theres no real prize why would you ever be so selfish? I would of happily sat there and got the admiration of Dawkins for writing a C everytime. Anita would have 4 pound but she'd also be a cunt.
jp23able 6 months ago
Comment removed
jp23able 6 months ago
I know the optimal strategy for the game! First, find someone to play who you know will always cooperate (perhaps not so easy). Then you must also choose to cooperate, every time. At the end of the game, however much reward has been won, the TOTAL amount will always be more than if any defects had been played, because it's 6 rewards for a double cooperation and 5 for coop & a defect... Now (this is the best bit) you just steal all the reward for yourself and go have some fun spending it! Haha.
Biozene 6 months ago
The markers in the study make the number of strokes audible and thus which letter apparent.
88tongued 6 months ago
@88tongued I thought so too but its not like they could of changed there answer after drawing a curve or a line.
jp23able 6 months ago
What a stupid fucking bitch. If he does C and she D, the next round should be the opposite both to communicate your willingness to cooperate, and to even out the previous unintended thievery. After both have taken the unfair advantage, the playing field is level and both have signaled their willingness to cooperate, and this is the only logical time to start continuously "c"ing.
fuduzan5562 6 months ago
@fuduzan5562
She's a girl, logic doesn't apply to her.
They're biologically prone to be a selfish, life-sucking succubus without regards to any others but herself.
HwarangOfFaith 6 months ago
anita is a paki wtf else do you expect from a paki?
yahoopig 6 months ago
My strategy for the game would have been simple and flawless - listen to the sound of the other person's pen and respond accordingly.
selfhelpguy 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
or
figure4etc3.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So here we have scientific evidence that shows us how greedy bitches are!
pinito25 7 months ago
Anita is a bitch in deed!
zarolhovski 7 months ago
I envy his wife, he's such an intelligent gentleman and quite good looking to boot.
INatalkaI 8 months ago 2
Anita reminds me my ex-wife.
quitoguru 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please!
Know how shallow Dawkins is by knowing the criticism to his VERY, VERY FRAGIL book and arguments... Watch on Youtube:
Dr. William Lane Craig Responds to Dawkins Book
or
William Lane Craig Leaves a Chair Open for Richard Dawkins
or
Richard Dawkins Made The Worst Argument Against God In The History of Western Thought
No wonder why he is running from Craig as the devil from the Cross: this true philosopher could easily show what an unprepared liar he is!
Thanks!
feanando 9 months ago
he should have picked M for make me a sandwich
corzocl 9 months ago 3
Comment removed
corzocl 9 months ago
4:09 a woman take the lead? Ahahahahahahaha!
corzocl 9 months ago
tz fuck you anita ;-)
TheDaviboy86 9 months ago
THOSE PENS ARE SO LOUD. THEY'RE LIKE ALLCAPS EXCEPT LITTLE KIDS DON'T HUFF ALLCAPS.
esdjiraan 9 months ago 2
@ 5:40 are those 2 apple c's????
eugeniobb 10 months ago
Dumb bitch!
bbsonjohn 10 months ago 2
Just like a woman... you give two before I give one.
MrTruthAddict 11 months ago 22
dawkins was quite cute hahaha
atuoft 1 year ago 2
Anita is an idiot.
sportsportsport 1 year ago 4
This proves women are evil!!!
smegnose 1 year ago
Adrian did it wrong. He knows that D is the "safe" answer. If you want the other person to switch, you have to give them three Cs in a row after a D. One to say "I don't just pick D every time." One more to say "really, I'm trying to work with you here, this isn't a dumb trick." And a final one because you have to give them a chance to respond with C now that you've set up a pattern. Only giving one C and then backing away can sting the other person if they try to cooperate immediately.
TheRichardHinckley 1 year ago
@TheRichardHinckley Not according to the computer simulation where the "Tit for Tat" strategy came out on top by copying the other player's last move. Three C's in a row is going way overboard.
imok4545 1 year ago
@imok4545 I understand how the program worked, but I'm talking about trying to communicate with another human being. Imagine a program called "Tat For Tit" that is exactly the same as Tit For Tat, but it starts with D instead of C. Faced with Tit For Tat, it would still do OK. They'd each get 5 points every 2 rounds (cheat followed by sucker, over and over). If one of them just put two Cs in a row, they'd each get 6 points every 2 rounds. The idea is to alter Anita's behavior with communication.
TheRichardHinckley 1 year ago
Anita played it smart!
1fotcn 1 year ago
9:05
Friedman, the "interesting grudge program", is the worst of the nice programs.
shadyparadox 1 year ago
These programs are awesome.
So glad to be a programmer now :D
supergamwich 1 year ago
Holy crap that computers old!
EllyKayWasHere 1 year ago
WHY Y NO PICK C?!?!
dodisman 1 year ago 4
dem computars
C0DZ0R 1 year ago
She expected him to get screwed over twice before she would think about working together. Then she has the nerve to say she was the one to take the lead lol.
septic55 1 year ago 27
@septic55 This pissed me off about her, too!
SuiginChou 1 year ago 2
@septic55 that's how women reason!
OLBICHL 1 month ago
He shouldn't have stopped the game at that moment! He missed a great opportunity to observe what would have happend after Anita finally chose "C". At least Adrian admitted that he would have chosen "C" next to cooperate, but still poor showing from the teacher. I'm pretty sure Dawkins was like WTF at that moment.
xebek 1 year ago 3
Anita is smart; Adrian is dumb. Simple
uriituw 1 year ago
@uriituw no, then you did not understand the point of this test and the whole documentary
aakkoin 1 year ago
This is a great series that explains business economy.
rehndawg 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anita can suck my dick.
dycarbon1 1 year ago
Comment removed
0megaD 1 year ago
Anita isnt very intelligent
phenomballer666 1 year ago 4
@phenomballer666 I agree, what she said didn't make sense.
comanchio1976 1 year ago
I think women need more persuasion then men...
Princedemars 1 year ago
anita you are a twat!!
smutyhouse 1 year ago
stop hating on anita. she's not a complete bitch. She's just "slow".
hardinmichael1981 1 year ago
women.
pinoy426 1 year ago
Anita's offspring are going to destroy the planet. She's unapologetic and has no sense of justice. Burn her!
MengoMango 1 year ago 3
I'm roped into this tit for tat stuff. I'm clicking 5/5 ...now
ashleylovesdaddy 1 year ago
I think Anita's a fucking bitch
I must be a grudger
MentalSentinel 1 year ago 4
Anita's logic is very weird. If Adrian goes C and Anita goes D then she should pay back with C and Adrian takes 4 as he should go D. In next round they should both go for C and win together with equal score.
Kozaack 1 year ago 2
So basically the best strategy is to do C then D and then C again and the D again and so on....
luarionte 2 years ago
ok maybe they should try a nice quiet pencil next time
jdpilotte 2 years ago 7
I think this game shows how people end up being arseholes.
If you do something nice and you get taken advantage of - you'll become an arsehole.
Like driving in London - I'm normally a C in the rest of the country. But in London, you have to be a D - because they're wankers; all of them.
jazzx251 2 years ago
I wish he would of trashed talked her during the game. Mutter, "bitch" or something.
TRUCKEEDOG666 2 years ago
Isn't that experiment setup kind of flawed considering that while they are not supposed to communicate the pens make clearly audible sounds (e.g. one stroke for C, two for D)?
KungPisstank 2 years ago 5
nah they dont pay enought attention maybe some do, but not all
sulthus 2 years ago
Yes indeed, but that still doesn't make it a good setup.
KungPisstank 2 years ago
well its like i said earlier in this comment
this experiment has been conducted at least 2 other times before that i can think of (ok i didnt state it that way.....i got that out of my psych book) so the fact that this one experiment is flawed, means nothing, the others were not, they were using computers in diffrent rooms
sulthus 2 years ago
Well I thought the sounds made it clear who wrote what as well.
But they both write it at the same time don't they? They are told to get the letter first, then told to write it down. So no cheating occurs.
Xirbtt 2 years ago
that is exactly what i thought
dixiebobber 2 years ago
Lol. Anita is a bitch.
Zryuken 2 years ago 100
Definitely.
I had expected her to write C in the round after Adrian's first C and Adrian to write a D.
Then, the following round I had expected both of them to write C.
But Anita never responded to Adrian's C until the very last round.
gagaplex 2 years ago 3
@Zryuken Is pretty natural that some one would like have a strategy of deceit and cunning to win against someone he shall never deal with again, a stranger. if they were related or were classmates i am sure they would have co-operated more. Thats exactly what Dawkins is trying to explain and you are failing to understand.
sushanalone 1 year ago
@sushanalone How could you possibly claim to know what I understand...? She's deceptive yes, but cunning, I disagree. She was merely being stubborn because she is uncooperative which is not usually a favorable trait in this society. Rather than be cooperative from the start she was skeptical of Adrian's cooperative intention, and while this may have played favorably to her in the short term, I again stress this is not a useful strategy in this society.
Even the simulation programs proves this...
Zryuken 1 year ago
but Adrian sucks too. he was inconsistent
davidmly08 2 years ago
I say we start a club, the "Anita Sucks" club.
davidmly08 2 years ago 9
anita sucks
MrWhiteX 2 years ago 4
...may be knowing how to spell ANITA will help :-)
bersa888 2 years ago
Axelrod as in Obamas campaign man?
RusselBertrand 2 years ago
Seems like the world of humans is overwhelmed with Aninitas
RusselBertrand 2 years ago 4
annita is a idiot
antonyneal 2 years ago
fuck annita
Fawkes676 2 years ago 2
No, you can draw a D with one line....but...yeah....flaw....
JonathanWKnight 2 years ago
anita is a greedy little bitch ;D
iouakick 3 years ago 91
thankyou dawkinschannel for posting this!
freeballs7 3 years ago
This is such a perfect, logical, mathematically sound explanation of how forgiveness and courtesy is the best strategy in life, regardless of your predisposition or religious beliefs. It almost makes me sick to see people suggesting atheism is amoral.
tohobbes 3 years ago 6
I didn't know Dawkin's subscribed to intelligent design, what's this garbage about a "preplanned cooperative strategy" being necesary to avoid extinction. Get back in our camp Dawson and toe Darwin's line!
andersonmmi 3 years ago
You probably missed it, but he explained exactly how preplanned cooperative strategy arises gradually through natural selection. Preplanned strategy devised by survival of the fittest (Darwinian evolution) is very different from invented strategy (intelligently designed strategy).
tohobbes 3 years ago 6
A and B would be better because both capital letters have three marks.
ComradeSephiroth 3 years ago
or even better, have a paper with C or D already written on it and have someone circle their choice.
tohobbes 3 years ago 5
The best strategy? Planned collusion with penalties for cheating. Just make sure the antitrust division doesn't catch you!
ComradeSephiroth 3 years ago
My thought exactly
livilla25 3 years ago
Typical women..... lol
ForzaInternazionale9 3 years ago