bunch of bullshit being spewed that will just confuse most christians who don't know shit about biology, and will just say "THIS SMART GUYS KNOWS HIS SHIT OMG!"
If he does understand the science, then he's purposefully misrepresenting the science to promote his views through deception.
He's either a fake, or a liar.
I'm not impressed by either one.
He expresses a complete lack of understanding of what he's describing... faking that lack of understanding to confuse others is certainly no better than not knowing it.
Great point, which is anothe way of saying matter can't produce intelligent information. The information has to already be there. Sense of humor can't evolve, it has to be there from the get go. If not, then the rest of the people could not laugh. Sense of humor has to exist in all humans at the same time. Fuck evolution, it's pure crap.
Is this guy seriously going to compare helicopters dropping down a message above a stadium to the very beggining of the universe? He really thinks those 2 events are comparable?
What he is basicaly saying is he as a human cant get his head around the complexity of DNA, like all ppl because of the youth of its discovery, doesnt mean that a mind or power similar to a human in thought process arranged it. This all is even further from proving christianity as well, it more promotes agnosticism.
@DWC3rmcm It's the word we use for what you said and what I'm saying, you just proved your self wrong with your own comment. "Information" is everywhere.
The critical problem Dr. Meyer keeps running into, I think, is the unfortunate fact that there is at least as much commitment to the atheistic implications of Darwinism as there is, in a purely scientific sense, to the theory itself. Pope Dawkins himself is actually pretty frank about that. Whatever the reason for it, if that often mindless commitment to atheism wasn't so strong, the science and sheer commonsense of ID would be be winning support everywhere.
Many theologians, many religious people are simply too intimidated by scientists, too afraid of 'invading their turf'' ...or at least what scientists define and aggressively defend as their own turf. So there's a natural, personal tendency to want pull back, to settle for peace and harmony and smiles all around.
Unfortunately, if there was ever an issue irrelevant to personal preferences and to harmony at any cost, this is it.
1) You're *limiting* God NOT to be like a pool player and NOT know exactly where the balls will randomly go? How about "The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the LORD" (Proverbs 16:33); 2) Nature NOT generating new information? How about biologists (even DI's Richard Sternberg) observing pseudogenes producing new functions and seeing developmental gene duplication throughout evolutionary history (e.g., flounders & sea horses).
@dogboygb Because they are unwilling to face the truth that most people realize how fallacious and full of it the DI is.
Since the Dover Trial, their lies have been exposed for everyone to see.
These fools know they are lying to everyone because of their own religious insecurities, and just like the cowards they are, they want to continue to hide it from everyone as best they can.
They should disable the comments as well, but that might be far too telling.
@CamW30 YOU STILL TROLLING? HEHE I SAID I WOULD BE GONE A WEEK; SORRY, I WAS GONE OVERSEAS FOR ABOUT A MONTH OR SO; I GAVE YOU TIME TO STOP TROLLING WITH YOUR EMPTY SELF; PEOPLE WILL NOT STAND FOR EVOLUTIONARY LIES ANYMORE; SCIENTISTS WILL BE ABLE TO TALK ON ALL THE IT'S FALLACIES; WHAT IS MORE BOTHERING IS THE PEOPLE WHO KEEP PROMOTING/TROLLING EVOLUTION; YOUR NEED TO TROLL I MEAN AND TROLL AND TROLL
@tumordick - Overseas, huh; so sad to hear that you were in the locked wing of the hospital. Have they adjusted your medication satisfactorily? Your last outburst was particularly frightening.
Actually there are forces of attraction that DO determine the order of the bases of DNA (or RNA) - hydrogen bonding. The rambling about "information" makes about as much sense as when Newman (on Seinfeld) says "When you control the mail, you control...information". Jerry asks, "What does that mean?" and Newman shrugs and walks away. Meyers is Newman, with an illusion of relevance.
Funny how creationist can rant all they want and try to produce so-called "intellectual" to counter evolution but still can't come up with a piece of paper to counter it in the arena of science. All this empty talks is very likely to fool the general public.
@FranksVoice "stop believing the lie of evolution"
Everyone knows it's kinda fun just blurting out baseless nonsense, but when your baseless statments contradict all the evdience for the subject in question, you don't come off well... It lumps you into the catorgory of " if we came from monkeys, then why are there still monkeys". The evolution of man is well documented and you can go look it up (you wont) We did not appear in present form!!! You DO know the church recanted the creation story??
"Although I was once sharply critical of the argument to DESIGN, I have since come to see that, when correctly formatted, this argument constitutes a persuasive case for the existence of God.” - Antony Flew (There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind 2007 )
Paul Davies: "[There] is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all…It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature’s numbers to make the Universe…The impression of design is overwhelming." Paul Davies is a physicist, cosmologist and astrobiologist working at Arizona State University...
@remieres TO LECTURE??? Paul Davies: "[There] is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all…It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature’s numbers to make the Universe…The impression of DESIGN is overwhelming." - Paul Davies is a physicist, cosmologist and astrobiologist working at Arizona State University...
@ledvonj - "Paul Davies is a physicist, cosmologist and astrobiologist working at Arizona State University"
And Dr. Davies accepts evolutionary theory. His perception of "design" is far different from yours. At least Davies has thought deeply on this; not just accepting what people tell him. Dr. Davies also doesn't appreciate being quoted out of context.
Besides, remieres IS an unthinking creationist, like you. Please, it is time to do the hard work & learn something.
@remieres - "thanks for the heads up because I was about to lecture him on things of evolution he does not seem to grasp."
Enlighten me, Oh Mighty One.
So, maybe you can help Mikey. You both say that micro-evolution (whatever that is) occurs, but macro-evolution doesn't. Where is the dividing line between the two?
People like you who regurgitate & spew creationist rhetoric, rather than take the time & energy needed to acquire real knowledge are being dishonest to themselves.
@remieres - "I was about to lecture him on things of evolution he does not seem to grasp."
I am still waiting for you to teach me about evolutionary theory. I'd like to know what are your scientific credentials in biology, so I will be able to tailor the discussion to your level of understanding.
I have 30+ years in science, with 27 years in neuropharmacology with a minor in genetics.
@imikewillrockyou - Just ran into me Mikey? I thought god didn't like liars.
You had better run off & learn something about science, because your pretending is getting stale.
"He's a troll that just tosses out pointless and baseless insults."
Hmm... I'm still waiting for your explanation on how nature "knows" how to stop mutations from progressing from "micro-" to "macro-" evolution. Also, explain how "nylonase" isn't increased information.
@CamW30 I am not so sure: Paul Davies: "[There] is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all…It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature’s numbers to make the Universe…The impression of DESIGN is overwhelming." - Paul Davies is a physicist, cosmologist and astrobiologist working at Arizona State University...
@CamW30 You claimed that you have a many years experience in science, and I think that background is enough for you to produced a single experiment that life originated from non living matter..Do you have any? I am very happy to see it....
HAHAHA.Really? I would be happy to point you to the 7568756754657846 peer reviewed articles on the fact that all organic lifeforms are made out of the dust from dead stars. You say God done it all hey. Evidence? Do YOU have any? I am very happy to see it....
@ScienceIsKnowledge What? no...I was referring Geneses 2:7, God formed man from the dust of the earth, "dust" maybe not stardust but i'm not sure what the difference is between earth dust and stardust
seems like you like to think that you are a "star" - pathetic.
and others who dance to this "Gavotte",
Hollywood stars are stars because the light shines on them, and they shine on people their light of inspiration. now if you see yourself inferior to this and jealous but can not achieve stardom , you can think that you are made of star dust so u are a star... he he he
But fact remains Carbon comes from Nitrogen + Cosmic rays from the sun - not from stars who died for U
brilliant video only god doesn't exist in evolution and Macro evolution doesn't happen though micro does (variations and breeds) god gave the world the information in the initial breeds of all animal mamal and plant life and everything was there at the beginning not as information ready to be used in future types of animals through Macro but rather for dogs they weren't dogs but rather a wolf kind of Canus lupus varient as has been confirmed to arise in Europe.
I recall that as a child I read a short story by the atheist Isaac Asimov that introduced concept of "pool room Darwinism." The only reason that an atheist of his convictions would introduce such a concept is because it would invalidate the literal translation of Genesis, something that Jesus Himself believed, and thus throw all of Christianity into question.
5:17 There are no connections between the bases? For an "easy" to understand explanation of the connection between the bases, please read Chapter 2 of Nick Lane's," Life Ascending".
Maybe you should have run this video by a geneticist first. All you are doing is making your side look foolish ... again!
I am really beginning to feel sorry for you guys. Even I have thought of some better, harder to refute, technical evidence for design than this.
bunch of bullshit being spewed that will just confuse most christians who don't know shit about biology, and will just say "THIS SMART GUYS KNOWS HIS SHIT OMG!"
phreaknite 2 weeks ago
why don't we ask stephen hawking oh! we have and what did he say
lwvok 1 month ago
Ratings disabled or course. Typical.
wowamonn 1 month ago
@ReturnOfTheJam
If he does understand the science, then he's purposefully misrepresenting the science to promote his views through deception.
He's either a fake, or a liar.
I'm not impressed by either one.
He expresses a complete lack of understanding of what he's describing... faking that lack of understanding to confuse others is certainly no better than not knowing it.
Ryakki 2 months ago
Meh, he doesn't understand science. Sure fakes it pretty decent though. He'd sound pretty smart if I was scientifically illiterate.
Ryakki 2 months ago
I'm waiting for Dawkins to accept Dr. Stephen's challenge for a debate.
hisham031170 4 months ago
Great point, which is anothe way of saying matter can't produce intelligent information. The information has to already be there. Sense of humor can't evolve, it has to be there from the get go. If not, then the rest of the people could not laugh. Sense of humor has to exist in all humans at the same time. Fuck evolution, it's pure crap.
cmpresents 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wedge Strategy shills.....
odinata 5 months ago
Very nice video indeed
algadykhalifa 5 months ago
Is this guy seriously going to compare helicopters dropping down a message above a stadium to the very beggining of the universe? He really thinks those 2 events are comparable?
What he is basicaly saying is he as a human cant get his head around the complexity of DNA, like all ppl because of the youth of its discovery, doesnt mean that a mind or power similar to a human in thought process arranged it. This all is even further from proving christianity as well, it more promotes agnosticism.
OnlinePokerCowboy 5 months ago
JDownloader FTW!
Dr. Stephen C. Meyer FTW!
:D
randomuseronthenet 7 months ago
Leave the "ad homs" home next time, bring a half an argument next time....
I am made out of material form stars, now fuck off.
"Carbon comes from Nitrogen + Cosmic rays from the sun"
Im pretty sure i just said that , kid.
ScienceIsKnowledge 8 months ago
@ScienceIsKnowledge
"I am made out of material form stars, now fuck off"
Not exactly.
2nd you are not a star .... LooooOl seem u insit that if stars r UR mom & dad or ur god, then u r a star worshipper.
and I can perfectly understand the psychology behind this
poor " Klaus " trying to enchant u with his mumbo jumbo
wake up , u are not a star, nor came from a star information comes from the creator. Stars are dumb
you are
billytistrak 7 months ago
@billytistrak
I am made of stardust, again, fuck off.
"Stars are dumb"
Yeah, ok buddy.
ScienceIsKnowledge 7 months ago
@ScienceIsKnowledge
One thing for sure your head is made of shit
billytistrak 7 months ago
well said... only one can understand the depth of information in its simplicity.
pacificrules 8 months ago
No different, both came from remnants of supernovas.
ScienceIsKnowledge 8 months ago
@FranksVoice
Fuck off, you douche bag.
ScienceIsKnowledge 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is no such thing as information
DWC3rmcm 9 months ago
@DWC3rmcm What? I don't understand what you're saying...
bogan182 8 months ago
@bogan182 , "information" is merely an attempt to encapsulate one partial set of properties bound instead to experience.
DWC3rmcm 7 months ago
@DWC3rmcm It's the word we use for what you said and what I'm saying, you just proved your self wrong with your own comment. "Information" is everywhere.
bogan182 7 months ago
The critical problem Dr. Meyer keeps running into, I think, is the unfortunate fact that there is at least as much commitment to the atheistic implications of Darwinism as there is, in a purely scientific sense, to the theory itself. Pope Dawkins himself is actually pretty frank about that. Whatever the reason for it, if that often mindless commitment to atheism wasn't so strong, the science and sheer commonsense of ID would be be winning support everywhere.
ObeKanobe 9 months ago
this is so sad. now wonder the world hates us. were a bunch of fucking morons...
fairy tales in science class. its like they want japan and china and india to keep kicking our kids ass in every educational application.
WAKE UP AMERICA THIS IS BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This man and his flock gave us BUSH.!!!!!!!
chipatzuwa 9 months ago
Many theologians, many religious people are simply too intimidated by scientists, too afraid of 'invading their turf'' ...or at least what scientists define and aggressively defend as their own turf. So there's a natural, personal tendency to want pull back, to settle for peace and harmony and smiles all around.
Unfortunately, if there was ever an issue irrelevant to personal preferences and to harmony at any cost, this is it.
ObeKanobe 9 months ago
Guys a genius. ID is so obvious.
9pt9 10 months ago
He has a Phd??? How can someone with that level of education not understand basic number theory!!!
NEGATIONofP 10 months ago
@NEGATIONofP He'll kick your ass in a debate.
hisham031170 4 months ago
@hisham031170 I assumes he knows where to find me. LOL
NEGATIONofP 4 months ago
@hisham031170 While we wait would you like to open with a question and/or "proof" to supporting your ideas?
NEGATIONofP 4 months ago
This man Dr, Stephen Meyer is indeed brilliant.
piusvapor 11 months ago
BRAVO DR MEYER BRAVO
BEAUTIFULLY PUT
DR STEPHEN MEYER IS "WINNING"
tumordick 11 months ago
1) You're *limiting* God NOT to be like a pool player and NOT know exactly where the balls will randomly go? How about "The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the LORD" (Proverbs 16:33); 2) Nature NOT generating new information? How about biologists (even DI's Richard Sternberg) observing pseudogenes producing new functions and seeing developmental gene duplication throughout evolutionary history (e.g., flounders & sea horses).
schraughts 1 year ago
why have the ratings been disabled for this video.
dogboygb 1 year ago
@dogboygb Because they are unwilling to face the truth that most people realize how fallacious and full of it the DI is.
Since the Dover Trial, their lies have been exposed for everyone to see.
These fools know they are lying to everyone because of their own religious insecurities, and just like the cowards they are, they want to continue to hide it from everyone as best they can.
They should disable the comments as well, but that might be far too telling.
ThatOneQuestion 11 months ago
A very informative video that helps explain some important details. Certainly helps putting things into perspective.
sgprailfan 1 year ago
god is real cuz magic is real right mah niggaz
ApocalypseNow0I2 1 year ago
i submitted my video as a response and sent it to meyer through his site
doubt i'll get any kind of reply
qdragon1337 1 year ago
@qdragon1337 - I was a good video about this one qdragon.
For others:
watch?v=dSKJ7p8NZiU
CamW30 1 year ago
@CamW30 YOU STILL TROLLING? HEHE I SAID I WOULD BE GONE A WEEK; SORRY, I WAS GONE OVERSEAS FOR ABOUT A MONTH OR SO; I GAVE YOU TIME TO STOP TROLLING WITH YOUR EMPTY SELF; PEOPLE WILL NOT STAND FOR EVOLUTIONARY LIES ANYMORE; SCIENTISTS WILL BE ABLE TO TALK ON ALL THE IT'S FALLACIES; WHAT IS MORE BOTHERING IS THE PEOPLE WHO KEEP PROMOTING/TROLLING EVOLUTION; YOUR NEED TO TROLL I MEAN AND TROLL AND TROLL
tumordick 11 months ago
@tumordick - Overseas, huh; so sad to hear that you were in the locked wing of the hospital. Have they adjusted your medication satisfactorily? Your last outburst was particularly frightening.
CamW30 11 months ago
Yes it does work scientifically, and so does evolution in general...
Ecoi1 1 year ago
I enjoy a good fairy tale, but lets keep it out of the lab.
Pineconevolved 1 year ago
Actually there are forces of attraction that DO determine the order of the bases of DNA (or RNA) - hydrogen bonding. The rambling about "information" makes about as much sense as when Newman (on Seinfeld) says "When you control the mail, you control...information". Jerry asks, "What does that mean?" and Newman shrugs and walks away. Meyers is Newman, with an illusion of relevance.
popecoyote1st 1 year ago
Way to go Dr. Meyer!
carsongbaker 1 year ago
science cannot find the essence of the information, science as never found the origin of anything it is merely an observer.
aaugoaa 1 year ago
Funny how creationist can rant all they want and try to produce so-called "intellectual" to counter evolution but still can't come up with a piece of paper to counter it in the arena of science. All this empty talks is very likely to fool the general public.
mykegoh 1 year ago
@FranksVoice "stop believing the lie of evolution"
Everyone knows it's kinda fun just blurting out baseless nonsense, but when your baseless statments contradict all the evdience for the subject in question, you don't come off well... It lumps you into the catorgory of " if we came from monkeys, then why are there still monkeys". The evolution of man is well documented and you can go look it up (you wont) We did not appear in present form!!! You DO know the church recanted the creation story??
TheEVILutionist 1 year ago
I love how so many of you act like you know what your talking about when you honestly can't even grasp neither of the theories clearly. =P
valeriesbutterflys 1 year ago
there is no information in the dna, there is data. Misuse of the word information makes his points very strange.
TheLittleDonkey 1 year ago
"Although I was once sharply critical of the argument to DESIGN, I have since come to see that, when correctly formatted, this argument constitutes a persuasive case for the existence of God.” - Antony Flew (There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind 2007 )
ledvonj 1 year ago
Paul Davies: "[There] is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all…It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature’s numbers to make the Universe…The impression of design is overwhelming." Paul Davies is a physicist, cosmologist and astrobiologist working at Arizona State University...
ledvonj 1 year ago
@remieres I just ran into CamW30 at another video. He's a troll that just tosses out pointless and baseless insults.
imikewillrockyou 1 year ago
@imikewillrockyou thanks for the heads up because I was about to lecture him on things of evolution he does not seem to grasp.
remieres 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@remieres TO LECTURE??? Paul Davies: "[There] is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all…It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature’s numbers to make the Universe…The impression of DESIGN is overwhelming." - Paul Davies is a physicist, cosmologist and astrobiologist working at Arizona State University...
ledvonj 1 year ago
@ledvonj - "Paul Davies is a physicist, cosmologist and astrobiologist working at Arizona State University"
And Dr. Davies accepts evolutionary theory. His perception of "design" is far different from yours. At least Davies has thought deeply on this; not just accepting what people tell him. Dr. Davies also doesn't appreciate being quoted out of context.
Besides, remieres IS an unthinking creationist, like you. Please, it is time to do the hard work & learn something.
CamW30 1 year ago
@CamW30 I think you are the one who misqoute davies, I am very happy if you can provide any evidence that davies believe in evolution...
trasmonteharry 11 months ago
@remieres - "thanks for the heads up because I was about to lecture him on things of evolution he does not seem to grasp."
Enlighten me, Oh Mighty One.
So, maybe you can help Mikey. You both say that micro-evolution (whatever that is) occurs, but macro-evolution doesn't. Where is the dividing line between the two?
People like you who regurgitate & spew creationist rhetoric, rather than take the time & energy needed to acquire real knowledge are being dishonest to themselves.
CamW30 1 year ago
@remieres - "I was about to lecture him on things of evolution he does not seem to grasp."
I am still waiting for you to teach me about evolutionary theory. I'd like to know what are your scientific credentials in biology, so I will be able to tailor the discussion to your level of understanding.
I have 30+ years in science, with 27 years in neuropharmacology with a minor in genetics.
Please, let the lecture begin!
CamW30 1 year ago
@imikewillrockyou - Just ran into me Mikey? I thought god didn't like liars.
You had better run off & learn something about science, because your pretending is getting stale.
"He's a troll that just tosses out pointless and baseless insults."
Hmm... I'm still waiting for your explanation on how nature "knows" how to stop mutations from progressing from "micro-" to "macro-" evolution. Also, explain how "nylonase" isn't increased information.
Still waiting, dude!
CamW30 1 year ago
@FranksVoice - "you are a special created being."
Live the lie; or read a book on evolutionary theory. The choice is yours.
Evolution is a fact. Case closed.
CamW30 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CamW30 I am not so sure: Paul Davies: "[There] is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all…It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature’s numbers to make the Universe…The impression of DESIGN is overwhelming." - Paul Davies is a physicist, cosmologist and astrobiologist working at Arizona State University...
ledvonj 1 year ago
@CamW30 You claimed that you have a many years experience in science, and I think that background is enough for you to produced a single experiment that life originated from non living matter..Do you have any? I am very happy to see it....
trasmonteharry 11 months ago
@trasmonteharry - "I think that background is enough for you to produced a single experiment that life originated from non living matter."
[sigh]
CamW30 11 months ago
Comment removed
ScienceIsKnowledge 9 months ago
Comment removed
ScienceIsKnowledge 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trasmonteharry
HAHAHA.Really? I would be happy to point you to the 7568756754657846 peer reviewed articles on the fact that all organic lifeforms are made out of the dust from dead stars. You say God done it all hey. Evidence? Do YOU have any? I am very happy to see it....
ScienceIsKnowledge 9 months ago
@ScienceIsKnowledge organic life made from dust? sounds an awe-full lot like the genesis story to me
Law19157 9 months ago
@Law19157
Really?
So the bible supports evolution now, does it?
NOT.
pfffft, go away.....
ScienceIsKnowledge 9 months ago
@ScienceIsKnowledge What? no...I was referring Geneses 2:7, God formed man from the dust of the earth, "dust" maybe not stardust but i'm not sure what the difference is between earth dust and stardust
Law19157 8 months ago
@ScienceIsKnowledge
seems like you like to think that you are a "star" - pathetic.
and others who dance to this "Gavotte",
Hollywood stars are stars because the light shines on them, and they shine on people their light of inspiration. now if you see yourself inferior to this and jealous but can not achieve stardom , you can think that you are made of star dust so u are a star... he he he
But fact remains Carbon comes from Nitrogen + Cosmic rays from the sun - not from stars who died for U
billytistrak 8 months ago
brilliant video only god doesn't exist in evolution and Macro evolution doesn't happen though micro does (variations and breeds) god gave the world the information in the initial breeds of all animal mamal and plant life and everything was there at the beginning not as information ready to be used in future types of animals through Macro but rather for dogs they weren't dogs but rather a wolf kind of Canus lupus varient as has been confirmed to arise in Europe.
remieres 1 year ago
@remieres - "brilliant video"
What video were you watching? Your lack of knowledge of evolutionary theory is apparent from the rest of your post. So sad.
CamW30 1 year ago
I recall that as a child I read a short story by the atheist Isaac Asimov that introduced concept of "pool room Darwinism." The only reason that an atheist of his convictions would introduce such a concept is because it would invalidate the literal translation of Genesis, something that Jesus Himself believed, and thus throw all of Christianity into question.
RighteousPaladin 1 year ago
expect a response
qdragon1337 1 year ago
@qdragon1337 - "expect a response"
LOL qdragon
CamW30 1 year ago
@CamW30 the title will be "Meyer Misinformation - Abiogenesis"
qdragon1337 1 year ago
@qdragon1337 - "Meyer Misinformation - Abiogenesis"
Cool! Can't wait. I guess he should read Chapter 1 of Lane's book as well, then. Love your stuff, man!
CamW30 1 year ago
Sun up; sun down? That set up is just too easy.
5:17 There are no connections between the bases? For an "easy" to understand explanation of the connection between the bases, please read Chapter 2 of Nick Lane's," Life Ascending".
Maybe you should have run this video by a geneticist first. All you are doing is making your side look foolish ... again!
I am really beginning to feel sorry for you guys. Even I have thought of some better, harder to refute, technical evidence for design than this.
CamW30 1 year ago
Comment removed
CamW30 1 year ago
great video, love your book signature in the cell.
bteeuwen 1 year ago
Design is beyond obvious
9pt9 1 year ago
Meyer is a very intelligent man.
rancantrell 1 year ago
Great video
onceforgivennowfree 1 year ago