all you have to do is look up in your personal time and say hey if there is a God show yourself to me. even ask is the bible the truth. he will respond to you 100%. he can respond in dreams, a vision, maybe an audible voice. depending how God wants to respond. so this is the way to get the evidence. its really basic and simple. God revealing himself to you. you can ask as many times as you want to so you can get confirmation that the bible is the facts of life. thus this debate is put to rest
funny his argument about the arms races and the designer having a conflict of interest - seems to mirror nicely the way that different countries, as George Carlin says, all mistakenly pray for god to help them win against their enemies. Someone's going to be disappointed! Which country is god siding with?!
I myself am an atheist and am proud to be one because of people like Richard Dawkins. Some atheists who comment on his video to ridicule theologians make me feel sick; take note of how RD addresses the person at the end of this video, this is the kind of respect we should show each other.
@ASH18YEARS It is an absolute necessity to ridicule theologians. Otherwise people might actually belief in the bullshit theologians peddle. Humanity did once. It was called the Dark Ages.
@TomFynn Absolutely, of course, what a brilliant thesis - what a fool I was... I'll be leaving now...
Oh, sorry Tom, can I call you Tom? Before I leave I just want to ask you one more thing. How do you intend to get people interested in knowledge and education when the people who claim to be some across as sanctimonious, arrogant, cruel cunts? These people haven't got the same credence as Christopher Hitchens, just to let you know.
Poor Dawkins has to take questions from a group of morons here. I feel that we as Americans have been robbed of a proper education. He was like, I got to catch a plane, I'm outta here!
@Diosukekun asap someone speaks negativity about jews, they are anti semites as well, this is a practise all religions does, to deter others from question they`re doings.
effectivily negating facts and such.
christianity does this al lto well in UK and the U.S. wah wah we are under attack wah wah we are a minority this is bullshit.
once we speak towards religion as it are, a scam and fraud, we get called anti-whatever.
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
I am a devolutionist. I believe in reverse evolution. I believe that all humans are going to devolve back into apes and chimps before the end of 2020. Take a closer look at this guy at 18:41 and you'll agree that I'm dead right.
theres an all knowing all powerful being who created everything for a very special branch of primate and who directly helps some, ignores others and casts most into eternal fire, i dont get whats so hard to understand about that.
@PhillipChristoph JUBBISM SAYS... your name means"lover of horses joshua boy" its up to you, however and other "toobers" to decide on an opinion for themselves. When science wins and we invent time travel, then the first thing it will do is get rid of all the followers of joshua, therefore removing your posts ALL OF THEM. your life -if you even end up existing!?- will have changed and you would never, ever really know. . JUBBISM says everyone is always right just never true anyhow.
PhillipChristoph SAYS, "Atheists... You are equally angry with God for creating a world in which you're too fucking dumb to understand."
>Classic, I love it. I have read this three times now, and each time i get the most pleasurable chuckle from it. Thanks!
BTW Folks, The Jesuit Evolution Myth and jesuit Heliocentricity Hoax and the jesuit Big Bang Scam were all invented to help fulfill papal Rome's Council of Trent agenda to destroy the Bible once & 4 all, Dawkins dim-wits.
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papacy cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM til Bible's destroyed folks
1. If there is morality in religion, how do you feel comfortable referring to people as "You fucks"? Just wondering.
2. Driving people who disagree with you into the sea has been a hallmark of Christianity for centuries. Thankfully, you no longer have that political power. Presumably, that is where your anger comes from.
3. Atheism does not hold as a principle the fact that there is no god, it merely asks for proof of his/her/it's existence.
@PhillipChristoph also, there is no hatred of god because it does not exist. There is only hatred of religiosity and those who self righteously perpetuate the myth commensurate with demonizing nonbelievers.
@PhillipChristoph you debase Atheists based on their hate yet you clearly express your hate for atheists. Now you know why we hate stupid religiosity; we hate the failure of reason and childlike ignorance.
Nietzsche already said all of this; this argument is centuries old. Dawkins isn't progressing anything. We already know that God is dead-- the Abrahamic God, that is. Now we need to find a replacement for this God. Dawkins repeats the line "God is dead", and then doesn't provide us with any replacement. What? Science? Science is the end in itself; it can't provide us with transcendental values. Dawkins' philosophy is empty; it will lead to Nihilism. Read Beyond Good and Evil; put Dawkins down.
@LowleyUK It's our university you should call it as we do. Also you should pronounce "Los Angeles," properly. Some different pronunciations are understandable, but mispronouncing the name of a city is not.
What i took offense to was that you portrayed a specific method that you abided by as superior. In that situation, i falsely assumed you to be arrogant and only nominally "open for discussion" as so many scientists i have met are today.
Can you see why if i assumed such that i would see no issue in reciprocating arrogance?
@aznbacon321 Yes i can. As someone who enjoys science as much as philosophy, I must be open to all discussion as opinion is formulated through information gathered. My personal bias towards science is because it is a technique that when proven wrong puts its hands up and admits it. If we don't we can never move forward with a comprehensive world.
If you compare it to crime and punishment then evidence based 'Theory' is like the modern criminal justice system and religion with its 'belifs' is comparable to the burning of witches based on personal feeling.Which sounds the most ill informed,dangerous and downright wrong?I don't see an inch for moment or even understanding of people who chose to live their lives this way and who infect other with their irrational 'belif'
@logicallunatic1 idk... I think it's natural for humans to have leaders. So we're all going to have leaders in our society no matter what... I'd much rather have an athiest and a man such as Dawkins as a leader, rather than a raging religious lunatic. Who unfortunately consist of too many of the world leaders today.
Well yea... I'd choose Dawkins over a religious nut anyday... my point is that he is not needed to lead any atheist group. Atheists are naturally free and independent thinkers -- no leaders required.
@logicallunatic1 Yea I see where you're coming from. Though I still believe it's possible to have a leader and be a free and independant thinker. Lol, It's not like he would become our king and deny us our rights to be free and independant thinkers...
True, I understand that, however the only thing an atheist may share with Dawkins is a disbelief in god/gods, everything else is off the table i.e. politics, economics etc. So, I would be careful putting leaders up on pedestals to respesent the atheist movement.
RICHARD DAWKINS - "OUR COLLECTIVE FREE TIME NEEDS TO SHIFT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE TO EDUCATION. WHETHER YOU'RE A YOUNG STUDENT OR FINISHED SCHOOL LONG AGO, GET OUT TO THE LIBRARY WHENEVER YOU CAN AND WORK HARD TO LEARN EVERYTHING YOU CAN ABOUT THIS WORLD. EACH INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIETY WILL BENEFIT FROM BEING ABLE TO SOLVE MORE PROBLEMS AND MAKE BETTER DECISIONS. EDUCATION IS AN AMAZING DISCOVERY PROCESS THAT REPAYS YOU ENDLESSLY."
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuits completely altered the education system to suit their evolution agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
The problem with buddhism is that you claim it's non-religious, and then you say "he settled under a tree and meditated for 6 years only drinking water ". NO HE DID NOT. This is a common trick of old-world religions, positing easy-to-understand miracles. The human body is not capable of this. You would die of bedsores and malnutrition very early on. Such a belief is the exact same religious nonsense as the Christians and all the rest.
@7j8i9m haha, so true.. but, from an atheist to another, don't just fuck off to all buddhist and eastern religious thought.. There's actually some pretty good things to be gleamed from Eastern religious philosophy
@7j8i9m Have you ever heard of symbolism, mythology, metaphor? If the fundamentalists are making the literalist fallacy, and the atheists are arguing against their literalist model, and not the fallacy itself, then you are both two idiots arguing about a misconception.
Reading a symbolic text literally is no less futile if you do it scientifically. It is fatuous and silly to disprove factually that which is not stated as fact.
@blackmichael75 Now it's symbolic? WTF? It used to be the be all and end all, the true Word Of God. Now it's only symbolic? Ah yes, of course. Science has shown us how all these miracles are so much bunkum, so that no one can still believe them to be fact and still be respected by any thinking person.
So now it's "symbolic". Bah, still humbug. Symbolic or not.
@TomFynn Nah. Symbols can represent something true, some idea which might be otherwise hard to express. Something about the cycle of the seasons, or the universal human yearning for meaning. It is to literalise them which is to render them absurd. And to be a crude reductionist in the name of science is to make yourself just as bad as the religious literalist.
@TomFynn How is it waffle? Do humans not universally yearns for meaning? Do we not have a cycle of seasons? Can you not see that, by being this reductionist, you're just mirroring the approach of the religious people?
@blackmichael75 The "universal yearning for meaning" is an interesting human feat based on a highly evolved simulation software. It might be of historical interest to see how that software misfired with the semi-illiterate goat herders from 2000 years ago who had to work on extremely limited information about the world, but that's about it. Nothing symbolic about it.
@TomFynn "simulation software", now who's waffling? It IS symbolic, obviously. The creation myth, the flood myth, the dying and rising god myth, just as symbolic as the stories about the Olympian gods of ancient Greece.
@TomFynn That's your daft interpretation of what our brain is. As for the Monty Python quote, I'm not sure how that's relevant or what it's meant to prove.
@TomFynn "Simulation software running on a neural network" is a fact, is it? Maybe the neural network,bit, but what constitutes the "simulation software" business?
And no, symbols aren't just interpreted arbitrarily. They can be multi-layered but they sometimes symbolise specific things. Their ambiguous nature is part of their richness, because the universe itself is ambiguous.
@TomFynn What's waffly about that statement? It is ambiguous in that we don't know have certainty and don't know everything about it. And you never explained the simulation software thing, which is not so much a fact as a metaphor, ie, a symbol.
@TomFynn I mis-typed, what I meant was "ambiguous in that we don't have certainty". You software simulation thing is an analogy, a metaphor, a symbol. And also, waffle.
@7j8i9m Most definitely, the problem is there are so many different breeds of Buddhism It's pretty misunderstood in our part of the world. But let's be honest most atheists, secularists and intellectuals would sooner stomach soft beliefs like that as opposed to beliefs like blowing yourself up in a train station will get you fast tracked to a heavenly whore house with exactly 72 virgins.
1) Lunchtime discussion on Oxford on the 'Oxford Debate'
2) "Is God a Delusion?" lecture with panel response (unless Dawkins shows up to debate!)
Run, Dawkins, run!! Keep running from Dr. Craig, from debate, from truth. That's the best thing you can do to keep your followers!!!!!!!!
In case you followers don't know, he's been avoiding Dr. Craig, for he... is afraid to death of debating him!!! LOL... Even an atheist publicly accused him of cowardice!!!
If there is a God, I will be going to hell because I don't believe in him. Period. I can't fake faith in something so incredibly nonsensical. Surely your omnipotent God would tell the difference between actual belief and just plain insurance?
@Surtak You are discussing the paradoxes of Pascal's Wager. "even if the existence of God could not be determined through reason, a rational person should wager as though God exists, because living life accordingly has everything to gain, and nothing to lose. "
How do you take out this insurance policy when you can't TRULY believe? Can an omnipotent god not see through such a charade? I could go to church every day, take the sacrament, but would I really believe it, or be deluding myself?
@Surtak I wasn't repeating it. I was giving a name to the concept of the insurance argument. I wasn't arguing with you, more arguing for what you were saying.
Ah, a bit of confusion there obviously. I'm well aware of Pascal's Wager, but it seemed to me like you misread my post somehow and were trying to argue.
@MrArpas123 That is the coward's way out. "I'm going to believe in God so I don't go to Hell." I don't need to fear a God to do the right thing, and I don't need the promise of presents if I believe in Santa and fulfill his requirements of being nice to my parents; I'll be nice to my parents because it's the right thing.
The contentment of the simple childish answers which religion has created to explain the unkown deprives them of the resolve to learn about the beautiful naturalistic mechanisms beneath; what an object represents in terms of the harmony of science. It is the insatiably questioning mind which drives humanity forward - not the contentment in erroneous simple answers for the sake of comfort.
Mike.... Man... You are vibrantly rabid towards inanimate theories. Fact?
Second Law of thermos-dynamics says you're wrong, so does mr Chuck Missler,
And Tom Horn. So does the flagellum. If we evolved why do Freemasons ( like you) want to introduce the holy grail of evil 'the triple helix. Wouldn't we just evolve that? Man, enjoy your tenure for researching cartoons.
@noodlesmealey A theory in your lay mind is more or less a suspicion or a guess. A scientific theory is defined as an explanation of facts and is the highest regarded acceptance of the consensus. The flagellum was debunked long long ago. The second law of therm-dynomics apparently, do not comprehend because it doesn't apply.
There is no god, that is clear regardless of what else you believe, i know some atheist who do not believe in the story as pitched by evolution either.
I myself do believe evolution to be the truth but that is do to the mass amount of evidence.
31 people still believe that this is all staged by almighty Satan himself. I don't feel pity for these people anymore.. I proudly laugh at them as owner of stable, healthy and non delusional brain! Some people think that I'm gifted, other that I'm a foolish servant of devil.. I rather call it being rationalist.
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
No, the anthropic principle is not circular reasoning, clearly we are here to think about it and clearly we were not always here to think about it, so there must have been a beginning to life on Earth and whatever that beginning may be it clearly worked!
It's a fact that we are here. Many speculations exists why we are here. Dawkins said "Our ancestors were only a couple of individuals, so it's hard to imagine that there children survived because of incest, but we are here so it must have worked.". You can't say that because we are here, therefore it happened. This is like saying that the Genesis account is true because we are here. This is circular reasoning.
@eagleeye2102 "You can't say that because we are here, therefore it happened"
he didn't, you said it yourself, what he actually said was
"it's hard to imagine that there children survived because of incest, but we are here so it must have worked."
He wasn't using that as reason for his assertion that "Our ancestors were only a couple of individuals", he was using it as reason for the fact that "that there children survived because of incest".
Those that have faith in a God of intervention are just look for a pat on the back and told that in the end it will all be OK. Life after death is nothing but chemical transference, entropy. Consciousness is Energy\Matter observing entropy taking place.
@Lingerminator Yet you cannot define "individual" consciousness and what properties that defines it. If you can relate to solipsism, you will understand that "nothing exists", unless there is an observer, and how this observer comes into being (you, in your case), is a mystery of life, that cannot be explained with technical theory. It is something that would tie into the existence of a "soul", or fate, or a definition of universal consciousness that is consistent, and always present.
@dujl entropy dictates "individuality". Everything erodes on its own, ending in in a singular. Thus the illusion of forever is born. The self is egotistical which forms a need to 'be forever'. No prove, for or against a soul, can be formed. If theoretically there is a soul attach to "individuality" it belongs to the ego through observation, part of the self, which is slave to entropy, meaning no 'forever'. Atomically we have forever. Resurrection. But no continual observation.
@dujl We were stardust and will be again. Knowing we will end means an enjoyment of observation through the magic of knowledge. Giving yourself, 'forever' is just simply boring. Acceptance of end makes memory precious and observation an adventure.
@dujl I state opinion on "technical theory" yes. That is were i'm at in building my world view. Which is a lifelong project. In a philosophical sense, my opinion, which i formulated before delving into reason, is that life is the universe observing its self, and life returns to the universe with a change because of observation. Which still gives ME the 'idea' that the self is not constant with its individuality. I would like to hear your opinion on why you think there is a constant individualty
@Lingerminator No, I agree and do believe that is true. But I believe that any individual consciousness is a universal experience, in a sense that it is experienced from different perspectives, but is always constant. Therefore it would be impossible to retain the same individuality twice, but also impossible not to experience consciousness in some way, as we become part of the whole.
@aznbacon321 ?. I did not mean to sound arrogant. You state no "definitive prove" and as science is driven by prove it is a more comprehensive world view. Maybe i should not have use the term "grown up" and i apologize...... But to be insulting is to show an arrogance towards discussion. Blah blah...etc is arrogant. I see it to often in those that require belief and it makes me sad towards our progression as a society. That when it is challenged, those that challenge are ridiculed to discredit.
@aznbacon321 My use of the term"grown up", however misplaced, is a comment on the fact that most of these 'MANY' opinions were formed in the infancy of or time as intelligent beings, and as we all do in our own life, the explanations we form as children evolve or are discarded. But as i have just experienced the techniques of the playground in retort are still in full effect. :)
the funny thing is that no1 rly gives a F** if god exists or not, it all comes down to whether theres life after death or not, and thats the force that drives it, had the god theory not provided that no1 would care whether you believed in it or not, but the god theory goes 1 step ahead and in addition to eternal life after death if u believe in it, also punishes with eternal damnation if you do not. Very convenient isnt it.
@MovieFusionist "but the god theory goes 1 step ahead and in addition to eternal life after death if u believe in it, also punishes with eternal damnation if you do not. Very convenient isnt it."
Excellent point!!! Religion promotes the ultimate MLM scam.
This has been flagged as spam show
all you have to do is look up in your personal time and say hey if there is a God show yourself to me. even ask is the bible the truth. he will respond to you 100%. he can respond in dreams, a vision, maybe an audible voice. depending how God wants to respond. so this is the way to get the evidence. its really basic and simple. God revealing himself to you. you can ask as many times as you want to so you can get confirmation that the bible is the facts of life. thus this debate is put to rest
udoherkommer 2 days ago
funny his argument about the arms races and the designer having a conflict of interest - seems to mirror nicely the way that different countries, as George Carlin says, all mistakenly pray for god to help them win against their enemies. Someone's going to be disappointed! Which country is god siding with?!
daveeeed 3 days ago
I myself am an atheist and am proud to be one because of people like Richard Dawkins. Some atheists who comment on his video to ridicule theologians make me feel sick; take note of how RD addresses the person at the end of this video, this is the kind of respect we should show each other.
ASH18YEARS 1 week ago 2
@ASH18YEARS It is an absolute necessity to ridicule theologians. Otherwise people might actually belief in the bullshit theologians peddle. Humanity did once. It was called the Dark Ages.
TomFynn 1 week ago
@TomFynn Absolutely, of course, what a brilliant thesis - what a fool I was... I'll be leaving now...
Oh, sorry Tom, can I call you Tom? Before I leave I just want to ask you one more thing. How do you intend to get people interested in knowledge and education when the people who claim to be some across as sanctimonious, arrogant, cruel cunts? These people haven't got the same credence as Christopher Hitchens, just to let you know.
ASH18YEARS 6 days ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@ASH18YEARS "I'll be leaving now..." Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
TomFynn 6 days ago
these questions are dumb
TheCycadsAreAudible 1 week ago
Poor Dawkins has to take questions from a group of morons here. I feel that we as Americans have been robbed of a proper education. He was like, I got to catch a plane, I'm outta here!
TheRainingInk 2 weeks ago
Mind porn.
MrYorkshireFella 2 weeks ago
"I respect you as a person too much to respect your ridiculous beliefs". Thats a good one!
ClydePaquinYT 2 weeks ago
1:12:15 WTF? WHY IS HE TALKING ABOUT THAT?
awesomeskier12345 2 weeks ago
@awesomeskier12345 Because he's answering a question in an honest way
TheCycadsAreAudible 1 week ago
Loved the speech, was let down by the public's questions.
Very nice upload.
minotarr 2 weeks ago
Richard Dawkins is a living treasure.
huwrj 2 weeks ago 3
excellent story teller.
halflifeproductionz 3 weeks ago 2
@halflifeproductionz Im willing to bet big money that you didnt finish the video. You just troll, thats all youl ever be.
BringinglT 1 week ago
You can always tell how smart someone is by how ugly their tie is. Damn it Richard, that is one ugly tie.
classISsick 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice clip .. i like it .. thanks for sharing
fivequotes 1 month ago
74:40 wow, i had no idea he was a closet anti-semite as well
Diosukekun 1 month ago
@Diosukekun asap someone speaks negativity about jews, they are anti semites as well, this is a practise all religions does, to deter others from question they`re doings.
effectivily negating facts and such.
christianity does this al lto well in UK and the U.S. wah wah we are under attack wah wah we are a minority this is bullshit.
once we speak towards religion as it are, a scam and fraud, we get called anti-whatever.
Debiiru 1 week ago
37 people went to UNC
TheDrewManXD 1 month ago
Have you seen the moonhoax?
fettkatt87 1 month ago
I have such a small penis:-(
any suggestions?
Clifton100 1 month ago
@PhillipChristoph "I hope all the Christians drive you into the sea you fucks!" How very Christian of you.
TomFynn 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
GET READY FOR THE GREAT WARNING NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am a devolutionist. I believe in reverse evolution. I believe that all humans are going to devolve back into apes and chimps before the end of 2020. Take a closer look at this guy at 18:41 and you'll agree that I'm dead right.
eltopus4747 2 months ago
im making it snow on Richard Dawkins :D
3xAmigosProductions 2 months ago
131313 views =)
krissmith1986 2 months ago
Go to 9:30 to skip the introduction.
Lleanlleawrg 2 months ago 78
@Lleanlleawrg Thank you :D
HiredForLife24 1 month ago
@Lleanlleawrg hey, thanks for the heads up about where to skip to get to the start of dawkins' lecture.
8bobthebuilder 2 weeks ago
@Lleanlleawrg thanks
spockck 4 days ago
His voice doesn't fit him.. it's totally throwing me off o.O
HelloCaille 2 months ago
Did anyone else just skip the introduction?
IBlack04 2 months ago 9
@phillipchristoph lol. you are stupid
CheezzusChrist 2 months ago
theres an all knowing all powerful being who created everything for a very special branch of primate and who directly helps some, ignores others and casts most into eternal fire, i dont get whats so hard to understand about that.
CheezzusChrist 2 months ago 5
@PhillipChristoph JUBBISM SAYS... your name means"lover of horses joshua boy" its up to you, however and other "toobers" to decide on an opinion for themselves. When science wins and we invent time travel, then the first thing it will do is get rid of all the followers of joshua, therefore removing your posts ALL OF THEM. your life -if you even end up existing!?- will have changed and you would never, ever really know. . JUBBISM says everyone is always right just never true anyhow.
macutchi 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PhillipChristoph
PhillipChristoph SAYS, "Atheists... You are equally angry with God for creating a world in which you're too fucking dumb to understand."
>Classic, I love it. I have read this three times now, and each time i get the most pleasurable chuckle from it. Thanks!
BTW Folks, The Jesuit Evolution Myth and jesuit Heliocentricity Hoax and the jesuit Big Bang Scam were all invented to help fulfill papal Rome's Council of Trent agenda to destroy the Bible once & 4 all, Dawkins dim-wits.
SpencerBenedict2nd 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given 2 the profane masses is another useful idiot 4 Jesuit machinations
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papacy cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age DESPOTISM til Bible's destroyed folks
SpencerBenedict2nd 2 months ago
@PhillipChristoph
1. If there is morality in religion, how do you feel comfortable referring to people as "You fucks"? Just wondering.
2. Driving people who disagree with you into the sea has been a hallmark of Christianity for centuries. Thankfully, you no longer have that political power. Presumably, that is where your anger comes from.
3. Atheism does not hold as a principle the fact that there is no god, it merely asks for proof of his/her/it's existence.
pomincanada 2 months ago
@PhillipChristoph also, there is no hatred of god because it does not exist. There is only hatred of religiosity and those who self righteously perpetuate the myth commensurate with demonizing nonbelievers.
donluchitti 3 months ago
@PhillipChristoph you debase Atheists based on their hate yet you clearly express your hate for atheists. Now you know why we hate stupid religiosity; we hate the failure of reason and childlike ignorance.
donluchitti 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nietzsche already said all of this; this argument is centuries old. Dawkins isn't progressing anything. We already know that God is dead-- the Abrahamic God, that is. Now we need to find a replacement for this God. Dawkins repeats the line "God is dead", and then doesn't provide us with any replacement. What? Science? Science is the end in itself; it can't provide us with transcendental values. Dawkins' philosophy is empty; it will lead to Nihilism. Read Beyond Good and Evil; put Dawkins down.
983215ljhlkadbspig6y 3 months ago
I really hate the way Americans pronounce Duke, as in Dook. It's pronounced Dyook!!
LowleyUK 3 months ago
@LowleyUK It's our university you should call it as we do. Also you should pronounce "Los Angeles," properly. Some different pronunciations are understandable, but mispronouncing the name of a city is not.
penisfuckeye 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@penisfuckeye
penisfuckeye SAYS, " It's our university you should call it..."
>You should call it what it is, . . . a jesuit indoctrination institution.
Jesuitical; pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuit Order completely altered the education system 2 suit their Evo-Hoax Agenda to discredit the Bible
Papal Rome cant have their Counter Reformation 2nd Dark Age one world tyranny DESPOTISM until Bible is destroyed, dim-wits.
SpencerBenedict2nd 2 months ago
@Lingerminator
What i took offense to was that you portrayed a specific method that you abided by as superior. In that situation, i falsely assumed you to be arrogant and only nominally "open for discussion" as so many scientists i have met are today.
Can you see why if i assumed such that i would see no issue in reciprocating arrogance?
aznbacon321 3 months ago
@aznbacon321 Yes i can. As someone who enjoys science as much as philosophy, I must be open to all discussion as opinion is formulated through information gathered. My personal bias towards science is because it is a technique that when proven wrong puts its hands up and admits it. If we don't we can never move forward with a comprehensive world.
Lingerminator 3 months ago
@aznbacon321 ..view.
Lingerminator 3 months ago
Stiefel Free Thought Foundation @ 1:13 ......how ironic
SanchezAfricano 3 months ago
Comment removed
TheManInBlack2003 4 months ago
If you compare it to crime and punishment then evidence based 'Theory' is like the modern criminal justice system and religion with its 'belifs' is comparable to the burning of witches based on personal feeling.Which sounds the most ill informed,dangerous and downright wrong?I don't see an inch for moment or even understanding of people who chose to live their lives this way and who infect other with their irrational 'belif'
YMB9Shinzou 4 months ago
Dawkins as a leader? No no and no! I am an atheist and I don't need to follow anyone.
logicallunatic1 4 months ago
@logicallunatic1 idk... I think it's natural for humans to have leaders. So we're all going to have leaders in our society no matter what... I'd much rather have an athiest and a man such as Dawkins as a leader, rather than a raging religious lunatic. Who unfortunately consist of too many of the world leaders today.
TheManInBlack2003 3 months ago
@TheManInBlack2003
Well yea... I'd choose Dawkins over a religious nut anyday... my point is that he is not needed to lead any atheist group. Atheists are naturally free and independent thinkers -- no leaders required.
logicallunatic1 3 months ago
@logicallunatic1 Yea I see where you're coming from. Though I still believe it's possible to have a leader and be a free and independant thinker. Lol, It's not like he would become our king and deny us our rights to be free and independant thinkers...
TheManInBlack2003 3 months ago
@logicallunatic1 Dawkins is more of a figurehead. An Icon or rolemodel for us.
Pr0pagandaFilms 3 months ago
@Pr0pagandaFilms
True, I understand that, however the only thing an atheist may share with Dawkins is a disbelief in god/gods, everything else is off the table i.e. politics, economics etc. So, I would be careful putting leaders up on pedestals to respesent the atheist movement.
logicallunatic1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RICHARD DAWKINS - "OUR COLLECTIVE FREE TIME NEEDS TO SHIFT AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE TO EDUCATION. WHETHER YOU'RE A YOUNG STUDENT OR FINISHED SCHOOL LONG AGO, GET OUT TO THE LIBRARY WHENEVER YOU CAN AND WORK HARD TO LEARN EVERYTHING YOU CAN ABOUT THIS WORLD. EACH INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIETY WILL BENEFIT FROM BEING ABLE TO SOLVE MORE PROBLEMS AND MAKE BETTER DECISIONS. EDUCATION IS AN AMAZING DISCOVERY PROCESS THAT REPAYS YOU ENDLESSLY."
TheLogicalBrain 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please visit my channel for the unpopular truth about homosexuality.
A person does not need hatred or any kind of phobia in order to acknowledge important differences between heterosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption and homosexual attraction / behavior / marriage / adoption. Even non-religious people know this.
Homosexual activists, with support from the media, have succeeded at framing themselves as noble victims; it's an effective way to push a social agenda.
lightandbeautiful 4 months ago
Genius at work.
philbyerm 4 months ago
Great speech!
Jotto999 4 months ago
goddamn good book, i based my senior research paper off this book a while back.
Deshwat90210 4 months ago
@Deshwat90210 wait... what's the book called again?
TheManInBlack2003 4 months ago
Stiefel is German and means "Boot" or "Boots"'
Tod means "dead"
Spirifiume 4 months ago
i am also against abusing women wether they are from religious groups such as christians muslims or atheists
talons2112 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Dead-to-the-spirit deluded "God Delusion" author & blithering fool scientist goon Richard Dawkins another "leader" given to the profane masses is another useful idiot for Jesuit machinations"-C.O.
Jesuitical: pertaining to the Jesuits or their principals; designing; cunning; deceitful; prevaricating
The Jesuits completely altered the education system to suit their evolution agenda to discredit the Bible. They cant have a Satanic society of 'Do as Thou Wilt' if people still follow the Bible
SpencerBenedict2nd 5 months ago
The problem with buddhism is that you claim it's non-religious, and then you say "he settled under a tree and meditated for 6 years only drinking water ". NO HE DID NOT. This is a common trick of old-world religions, positing easy-to-understand miracles. The human body is not capable of this. You would die of bedsores and malnutrition very early on. Such a belief is the exact same religious nonsense as the Christians and all the rest.
7j8i9m 5 months ago 48
@7j8i9m haha, so true.. but, from an atheist to another, don't just fuck off to all buddhist and eastern religious thought.. There's actually some pretty good things to be gleamed from Eastern religious philosophy
SHIBBYiPANDA 1 month ago
@7j8i9m Have you ever heard of symbolism, mythology, metaphor? If the fundamentalists are making the literalist fallacy, and the atheists are arguing against their literalist model, and not the fallacy itself, then you are both two idiots arguing about a misconception.
Reading a symbolic text literally is no less futile if you do it scientifically. It is fatuous and silly to disprove factually that which is not stated as fact.
blackmichael75 1 month ago
@blackmichael75 Now it's symbolic? WTF? It used to be the be all and end all, the true Word Of God. Now it's only symbolic? Ah yes, of course. Science has shown us how all these miracles are so much bunkum, so that no one can still believe them to be fact and still be respected by any thinking person.
So now it's "symbolic". Bah, still humbug. Symbolic or not.
TomFynn 1 month ago in playlist Liked videos
@TomFynn Nah. Symbols can represent something true, some idea which might be otherwise hard to express. Something about the cycle of the seasons, or the universal human yearning for meaning. It is to literalise them which is to render them absurd. And to be a crude reductionist in the name of science is to make yourself just as bad as the religious literalist.
blackmichael75 1 month ago
@blackmichael75 "Something about the cycle of the seasons, or the universal human yearning for meaning" You want some syrup with that waffle?
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn How is it waffle? Do humans not universally yearns for meaning? Do we not have a cycle of seasons? Can you not see that, by being this reductionist, you're just mirroring the approach of the religious people?
blackmichael75 1 month ago
@blackmichael75 The "universal yearning for meaning" is an interesting human feat based on a highly evolved simulation software. It might be of historical interest to see how that software misfired with the semi-illiterate goat herders from 2000 years ago who had to work on extremely limited information about the world, but that's about it. Nothing symbolic about it.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn "simulation software", now who's waffling? It IS symbolic, obviously. The creation myth, the flood myth, the dying and rising god myth, just as symbolic as the stories about the Olympian gods of ancient Greece.
blackmichael75 1 month ago
@blackmichael75 Sorry, but *do* have a simulation software running on a neural network, That's not waffling. That's what our brain *is*
As for "symbolic":
Francis: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.
Reg: It's symbolic of his struggle against reality. .
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn That's your daft interpretation of what our brain is. As for the Monty Python quote, I'm not sure how that's relevant or what it's meant to prove.
blackmichael75 1 month ago
@blackmichael75 That's not an interpretation. It's a fact. Like it or leave it.
The point of the quote is that anything is/and/or can be symbolic of anything. That's why this symbolic talk is all waffle.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn "Simulation software running on a neural network" is a fact, is it? Maybe the neural network,bit, but what constitutes the "simulation software" business?
And no, symbols aren't just interpreted arbitrarily. They can be multi-layered but they sometimes symbolise specific things. Their ambiguous nature is part of their richness, because the universe itself is ambiguous.
blackmichael75 1 month ago
@blackmichael75 "the universe itself is ambiguous. " I'm running out of syrup here.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn What's waffly about that statement? It is ambiguous in that we don't know have certainty and don't know everything about it. And you never explained the simulation software thing, which is not so much a fact as a metaphor, ie, a symbol.
blackmichael75 1 month ago
@blackmichael75 "ambiguous in that we don't know have certainty" Yes, known in the real world as waffle.
Software: The sum of thresholds levels for the firing imprinted in the neurons of our brains over time.
Simulation: The mapping of complex, multi-variate data onto a simple model.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn I mis-typed, what I meant was "ambiguous in that we don't have certainty". You software simulation thing is an analogy, a metaphor, a symbol. And also, waffle.
blackmichael75 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@blackmichael75 "an analogy, a metaphor, a symbol. And also, waffle. " Make up your mind.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@7j8i9m Most definitely, the problem is there are so many different breeds of Buddhism It's pretty misunderstood in our part of the world. But let's be honest most atheists, secularists and intellectuals would sooner stomach soft beliefs like that as opposed to beliefs like blowing yourself up in a train station will get you fast tracked to a heavenly whore house with exactly 72 virgins.
mrgejwaites 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
England - Tue Oct 25, 2011
1) Lunchtime discussion on Oxford on the 'Oxford Debate'
2) "Is God a Delusion?" lecture with panel response (unless Dawkins shows up to debate!)
Run, Dawkins, run!! Keep running from Dr. Craig, from debate, from truth. That's the best thing you can do to keep your followers!!!!!!!!
In case you followers don't know, he's been avoiding Dr. Craig, for he... is afraid to death of debating him!!! LOL... Even an atheist publicly accused him of cowardice!!!
feanando 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard Dawkins has gone off the rails:
search for Richard Dawkins and male privilege on Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy blog.
Participating in flaming a woman because she dares to say 'don't objectify me at a conference'? Poorly done, Dawkins.
8yankee 5 months ago
Fantastic, really enjoyed that.
jasondcone 5 months ago
@MrArpas123
If there is a God, I will be going to hell because I don't believe in him. Period. I can't fake faith in something so incredibly nonsensical. Surely your omnipotent God would tell the difference between actual belief and just plain insurance?
...I just realised I'm wasting time here.
Surtak 5 months ago
@Surtak You are discussing the paradoxes of Pascal's Wager. "even if the existence of God could not be determined through reason, a rational person should wager as though God exists, because living life accordingly has everything to gain, and nothing to lose. "
How do you take out this insurance policy when you can't TRULY believe? Can an omnipotent god not see through such a charade? I could go to church every day, take the sacrament, but would I really believe it, or be deluding myself?
wgfcrafty 5 months ago
@wgfcrafty
I'm sorry, but why are you repeating what I said? I think you need to read my post over again.
Surtak 5 months ago
@Surtak I wasn't repeating it. I was giving a name to the concept of the insurance argument. I wasn't arguing with you, more arguing for what you were saying.
wgfcrafty 5 months ago
@wgfcrafty
Ah, a bit of confusion there obviously. I'm well aware of Pascal's Wager, but it seemed to me like you misread my post somehow and were trying to argue.
No worries then :)
Surtak 5 months ago
@Surtak Nope. Can't argue with good logic.
wgfcrafty 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wgfcrafty
You say that, but a lot of people think they can.
Surtak 5 months ago
@MrArpas123 That is the coward's way out. "I'm going to believe in God so I don't go to Hell." I don't need to fear a God to do the right thing, and I don't need the promise of presents if I believe in Santa and fulfill his requirements of being nice to my parents; I'll be nice to my parents because it's the right thing.
Same thing, no?
Livilulu44 5 months ago
@MrArpas123 A wonderful example how religion encourages tribal thinking. BTW: Nice True Scotsman fallacy there.
TomFynn 5 months ago
@MrArpas123 Ur? Your. you don't capatalize every word.
It is not a title.
You are a theist, by definition religious.
By definition of your religion you can't know you are a true christian.
ONLY GOD CAN KNOW.
How do you know?
Maybe only Mormons get into heaven?
wgfcrafty 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The contentment of the simple childish answers which religion has created to explain the unkown deprives them of the resolve to learn about the beautiful naturalistic mechanisms beneath; what an object represents in terms of the harmony of science. It is the insatiably questioning mind which drives humanity forward - not the contentment in erroneous simple answers for the sake of comfort.
shinshoshine 5 months ago
The introducer is such a fucking dork.
dujl 6 months ago
32 people believe in the great Juju
PylonOvBlack 6 months ago
@MrArpas123 I can tell you're religious because you can't spell very well.
beatonm198 6 months ago
Dawkins is a rfeal scientist... FULL RESPECT
lionsingh18 6 months ago
Richard begins speaking at 9:27
funnyfacerful 6 months ago 47
@funnyfacerful 9:44 actually....
Pr0pagandaFilms 3 months ago
another god .?shucks haven,t we had enough of old men exploiting young girls.?
mickwillie1 6 months ago
Rick...
Mike.... Man... You are vibrantly rabid towards inanimate theories. Fact?
Second Law of thermos-dynamics says you're wrong, so does mr Chuck Missler,
And Tom Horn. So does the flagellum. If we evolved why do Freemasons ( like you) want to introduce the holy grail of evil 'the triple helix. Wouldn't we just evolve that? Man, enjoy your tenure for researching cartoons.
noodlesmealey 6 months ago
@noodlesmealey A theory in your lay mind is more or less a suspicion or a guess. A scientific theory is defined as an explanation of facts and is the highest regarded acceptance of the consensus. The flagellum was debunked long long ago. The second law of therm-dynomics apparently, do not comprehend because it doesn't apply.
splicedenergy 6 months ago
There is no god, that is clear regardless of what else you believe, i know some atheist who do not believe in the story as pitched by evolution either.
I myself do believe evolution to be the truth but that is do to the mass amount of evidence.
CondorDMaDnD2ed 6 months ago
31 people still believe that this is all staged by almighty Satan himself. I don't feel pity for these people anymore.. I proudly laugh at them as owner of stable, healthy and non delusional brain! Some people think that I'm gifted, other that I'm a foolish servant of devil.. I rather call it being rationalist.
BabaShtrumf 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: DEADLY ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
Save time and jump directly to 9:20 :))
MultiBrados 6 months ago
dawkins needs to have his head examined
mrtadreamer 6 months ago
@mrtadreamer He does need to get his head examined so we can all know how the mind of a genius works
bucketheadkfc 6 months ago 2
Dawkins, the question is to consist of a single protein by chance ??????replies to the question if there shall call evolution.
dede1212asd 7 months ago
@dede1212asd
Would you like another go at that comment, it made no sense whatsoever.
seansalvador1 6 months ago
Dawkins, the question is to consist of a single protein by chance ??????
dede1212asd 7 months ago
Why does he say at 0:11:7 on one planet we had life? I thought he believed in aliens.
lotr450 7 months ago
There is no evidence of aliens at the moment. Nobody can say for sure there are beings out there besides us.
87RongShao 7 months ago
@87RongShao Yeah, but extraterrestrial life is almost certainly real considering the scale of the Universe.
lotr450 7 months ago
@lotr450
No, he says it is very probable, as does anyone with even a perfunctory education in the subject.
seansalvador1 6 months ago
@seansalvador1 Yeah but he said"on one planet, possibly the ONLY planet" referring to earth.
lotr450 6 months ago
@lotr450
...and this refutes what i said how exactly?
seansalvador1 6 months ago
@seansalvador1 Forget it.
lotr450 6 months ago
58:32 - 59:09
"It worked because we are here". Isn't that Circular reasoning? Just like this:
"Why do you snip with your fingers?"
"to keep the elephants away."
"But there aren't any elephants here!"
"Pretty effective, isn't it?"
eagleeye2102 7 months ago
@eagleeye2102 "Isn't that Circular reasoning?"
No, the anthropic principle is not circular reasoning, clearly we are here to think about it and clearly we were not always here to think about it, so there must have been a beginning to life on Earth and whatever that beginning may be it clearly worked!
seansalvador1 6 months ago
@seansalvador1
It's a fact that we are here. Many speculations exists why we are here. Dawkins said "Our ancestors were only a couple of individuals, so it's hard to imagine that there children survived because of incest, but we are here so it must have worked.". You can't say that because we are here, therefore it happened. This is like saying that the Genesis account is true because we are here. This is circular reasoning.
eagleeye2102 6 months ago
@eagleeye2102 "You can't say that because we are here, therefore it happened"
he didn't, you said it yourself, what he actually said was
"it's hard to imagine that there children survived because of incest, but we are here so it must have worked."
He wasn't using that as reason for his assertion that "Our ancestors were only a couple of individuals", he was using it as reason for the fact that "that there children survived because of incest".
Which is prima facie.
seansalvador1 6 months ago
@seansalvador1
58:48 - 59:00
"In some cases evidently there is because here we are"
This is circular reasoning at the finest, but he said "in some cases" so there must be some evidence to support his view.
eagleeye2102 6 months ago
@eagleeye2102
No, for the reasons i explained above it is not. Would you like to address what i said or simply repeat this tautology?
seansalvador1 6 months ago
@seansalvador1
Ok.
eagleeye2102 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 7 months ago
Die Evolutionstheorie, das Märchen des wissenschaflichen Zeitalters, ist ein sterbender Kadaver, das unseren Verstand vergiftet !
cybernautikon 7 months ago
"Fossil rabbits in the pre-Cambrian!" Hilarious!!
ns81 7 months ago
@1:12 sounds like: "the stifle free thought foundation"
bl8ant 7 months ago
Turn up the volume!!!
ytrogergt 7 months ago
Comment removed
xerox123321 7 months ago
Comment removed
xerox123321 7 months ago
Those that have faith in a God of intervention are just look for a pat on the back and told that in the end it will all be OK. Life after death is nothing but chemical transference, entropy. Consciousness is Energy\Matter observing entropy taking place.
Lingerminator 7 months ago
@Lingerminator
The reason why there are MANY explanations for consciousness is because none can be definitively proven.
aznbacon321 7 months ago
@aznbacon321
Needless to say though, that Cartesian dualism is long dead.
seansalvador1 6 months ago
@aznbacon321 Which is why science is the grown up way to define it.
Lingerminator 3 months ago
@Lingerminator Yet you cannot define "individual" consciousness and what properties that defines it. If you can relate to solipsism, you will understand that "nothing exists", unless there is an observer, and how this observer comes into being (you, in your case), is a mystery of life, that cannot be explained with technical theory. It is something that would tie into the existence of a "soul", or fate, or a definition of universal consciousness that is consistent, and always present.
dujl 6 months ago
@dujl entropy dictates "individuality". Everything erodes on its own, ending in in a singular. Thus the illusion of forever is born. The self is egotistical which forms a need to 'be forever'. No prove, for or against a soul, can be formed. If theoretically there is a soul attach to "individuality" it belongs to the ego through observation, part of the self, which is slave to entropy, meaning no 'forever'. Atomically we have forever. Resurrection. But no continual observation.
Lingerminator 3 months ago
@dujl We were stardust and will be again. Knowing we will end means an enjoyment of observation through the magic of knowledge. Giving yourself, 'forever' is just simply boring. Acceptance of end makes memory precious and observation an adventure.
Lingerminator 3 months ago 31
@Lingerminator You're entitled to your opinion.
dujl 3 months ago
@dujl I state opinion on "technical theory" yes. That is were i'm at in building my world view. Which is a lifelong project. In a philosophical sense, my opinion, which i formulated before delving into reason, is that life is the universe observing its self, and life returns to the universe with a change because of observation. Which still gives ME the 'idea' that the self is not constant with its individuality. I would like to hear your opinion on why you think there is a constant individualty
Lingerminator 3 months ago
@Lingerminator No, I agree and do believe that is true. But I believe that any individual consciousness is a universal experience, in a sense that it is experienced from different perspectives, but is always constant. Therefore it would be impossible to retain the same individuality twice, but also impossible not to experience consciousness in some way, as we become part of the whole.
dujl 3 months ago
@dujl Thank you for your thoughts!
Lingerminator 3 months ago
@Lingerminator
blah blah blah, blah blah blah blah. If you want to be the arrogant bastard of the conversation there is nothing to ever discuss.
aznbacon321 3 months ago
@aznbacon321 ?. I did not mean to sound arrogant. You state no "definitive prove" and as science is driven by prove it is a more comprehensive world view. Maybe i should not have use the term "grown up" and i apologize...... But to be insulting is to show an arrogance towards discussion. Blah blah...etc is arrogant. I see it to often in those that require belief and it makes me sad towards our progression as a society. That when it is challenged, those that challenge are ridiculed to discredit.
Lingerminator 3 months ago
@aznbacon321 My use of the term"grown up", however misplaced, is a comment on the fact that most of these 'MANY' opinions were formed in the infancy of or time as intelligent beings, and as we all do in our own life, the explanations we form as children evolve or are discarded. But as i have just experienced the techniques of the playground in retort are still in full effect. :)
Lingerminator 3 months ago
@Lingerminator That was oddly.. poetic O_O
Niemtol2 1 week ago
Dook.
MrBuch169169 7 months ago
how did dawkins know about the spagetti monster......did he tie the knots.???
who does he work for would be the most valid question.?
mickwillie1 7 months ago
@mickwillie1
He used to work for the university of Oxford, now he works for himself.
seansalvador1 6 months ago
@seansalvador1 Still works with Oxford, works for others not just himself
CondorDMaDnD2ed 6 months ago
the funny thing is that no1 rly gives a F** if god exists or not, it all comes down to whether theres life after death or not, and thats the force that drives it, had the god theory not provided that no1 would care whether you believed in it or not, but the god theory goes 1 step ahead and in addition to eternal life after death if u believe in it, also punishes with eternal damnation if you do not. Very convenient isnt it.
MovieFusionist 7 months ago 2
@MovieFusionist "but the god theory goes 1 step ahead and in addition to eternal life after death if u believe in it, also punishes with eternal damnation if you do not. Very convenient isnt it."
Excellent point!!! Religion promotes the ultimate MLM scam.
ptij0404 6 months ago
Dawkins 9:20
chaomonga 8 months ago 122
@chaomonga Thanks for that! [:
TheBiAtheist 7 months ago
@chaomonga lol when i pressed on your comment (time) i saw a blue screen with RD's name. i tot fuck is this audio only? fortunately it was not. lol
880330145789 4 months ago
@chaomonga well that was quite some ado there.. lol
boecxyec 4 months ago
What's a dook? *chortle* Dook University eh? Heh ha.
UnitedKingdomify 8 months ago
why was it in recommend videos for duke nukem forever trailer? ehh
badfatherjames