Added: 2 years ago
From: Faulisalive
Views: 7,734
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (62)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I swear the doorknob behind McCartney moved a tenth of a millimeter....poltergeist?

  • I don't get it. One is in HD and the other one in TV screen very bad resolution (so that logically appear slow-down.

    Are you saying these are two different takes ?

  • Firts? My seven year old is more intelligent than this idiot.

  • His voice is still the same as before 1966. So that's how we know Paul is not dead!

  • Hello.

    See,it is kinda impossible to make of that poor-quality ,blurried and deformed video,a high quality ,natural and almost HD one,so,what comes on me mind it's this:They (whoever they are) had the 'original' video,they ruined it with some techniques,and then,claimed that the altered one was the original,and finally they showed up the real original video claiming is the edited one.

    There is nothing more obvious than it.

    Paul is alive.

  • Umm... I always trust the clearer image as the original...

    IT MAKES MORE SENSE THAT WAY

    Besides, the "tampered" (clearer) video looks more natural. Like a human being could actually look like that.

  • @funkimonki360 His point was that the clearer image was produced after the technology got better, so really trusting the clearer image doesn't really make all that much sense if it isn't the original, but as to whether or not Paul is dead, probably not.

  • The're too alike to be different. When stretching the image (a rubber soul effect) they look different of course. It's the same voice anyway, and it can't be recorded at 2 different times anyway.

  • the word JACKTARD comes to mind. Hey, Faullisalive, come with me to circuit city and I'll show you how the same program can look different on 25 different television...BECAUSE THEY ALL HAVE VARYING QUALITY... Please stop making a fool of yourself. ENOUGH.

  • Firts?

  • @darling67 Paul is live, doesnt exist documents of "Paul's accident". Is impossible find a Paul's double.

  • @Faulisalive You are the stupid's kings. Paul is live, he lives with his brother MIKE MCCARTNEY, you are succker, jaja!

  • ... Whats this suppose to show? How to enhance quality on a video clip?

  • sigh... i hate you.

    and not even because you say hes dead.

  • No seaa mamon we o quiere q lo mate klaro q no sea muerto tarado Hahahahahaahah

    :$

  • wow ....what kind of moron are we dealing with here?!?

  • Not sure what this even supposed to be talking about. There is lots more interesting Faul stuff to go around than this.

  • Our bas-player is cross-eyed, does that mean he's a faul to?

  • This video is pointless.

    The footage at 1:00 is how it's supposed to appear. Yes, it's cropped from its original aspect ratio, but it hasn't been "doctored to make Bill look more like Paul", the story that iditos like Faulconpoop claim.

  • Look, a cleft chin is not hard to reproduce dude! I purchased one from one Dr.William Heddan 3 years ago for $1,300 he simply carved a notch in the exsiting implant. I wanted to resemble my father more so I know this is possible.

  • If Paul is dead then who married Linda Eastman and started Wings in the 70s? They can't explain that, can they?

  • @DerekBayRoberts1 it would have been the stand-in they used as paul. a "look-a-like"

  • I never heard biggest stupidity and how you explain he has the same gesture,manners,smile,laugh,et­c,etc huh you idiots

  • The blurry video is tampered by PID conspirators, obviously...and whoever made this video has to learn how to spell....

  • @darling67 totally agree with you...just look at the types of people who believe in the PID rumor/hoax...total Nerds/idiots!!! Paul is alive and well, and almost 70!! What do these dicks gain with this conspiracy anyway??

  • Ok. So, if Paul is really dead:

    1. Linda Eastman's marriage certificate must have read "Linda Eastman Campbell!"

    2. It was "Bill Campbell and Wings!"

    3. Stevie Wonder and Micheal Jackson had no problem collaborating with "William Campbell."

  • 4. We are now, still witnessing the biggest, longest-lasting fraud, the entertainment industry has EVER perpetrated on the public. & If there is even ONE CREDIBLE WHISTLE BLOWER, can you even begin to imagine the lawsuits that would stretch from on end of the industry to the other and stand half of the entertainment industry (and the entire pop MUSIC industry) ON ITS HEAD!?

    Just think, people!!!

  • 5. James Paul McCartney was knighted by the Queen of England. There, people get knighted under their BIRTH name. So, if this is an imposter, one of 2 situations exist:

    - The royal family has been DUPED just like the rest of us.

    - The royal family is actually IN ON the fraud.

    Either way, if the truth were to come out, can you imagine the world-wide HUMILIATION to the royal family and the ensuing FURY among the British people, who practically WORSHIP their royal family!?!??

  • Besides, there are several variations in the "actual events" that took place, the night he allegedly died.

    One last point of note: A lot has been made of Paul's and Faul's physical features. There is ONE feature that would be EXTREMELY difficult to reproduce, surgically and is unique to EVERYONE who has it -- a CLEFT, DOUBLE CHIN!!! Just look at his CHIN from his early days and look at his chin, even NOW! THEY ARE STILL IDENTICAL!!!

  • Some idiot made this video... someone who can't even spell "FIRST"...

  • Poor quality and streching of the old video can explain the different look. The example I noticed of the streching in the old video was the eyebrows. they don't even look alike a normal person's eyebrows.

  • @darling67 you lack intelligence and attention span darling. Explain the 2inch hight of growth from 66 to 67? Explain when Faul got arrested in Japan, he got finger printed and the prints did not match his pre 66 records darling?

  • (Cont'd) which are coming out from 2010 through 2012. It includes material from the once-lost suitcase of murdered Mal Evans, plus much else. It is called "The Winged Beatle: Beatle with an A, Magic with a K" at vimeo. com /16353230 and is by iamaphoney the insider who made Rotten Apple series here on Youtube from 2006-present. It's no joke and if you use your critical faculties carefully, it shows it's no joke. Best wishes. P.S. The "George Harrison tapes" movie is a fraud & filled w/ mistakes.

  • Nope. This one is misleading: there are tampered images, but not this one. You have been uncritical here: the 2nd video (the better one) could not be "derived" from the worse one. On the other hand, good comps are at xoomer. virgilio. it/ james_paul_mccartney/others. html for Willie Campbell (Sir PM) and xoomer. virgilio. it/ james_paul_mccartney/photo. html for PM, though 6 & 10 are wrongly attributed there as undoctored and original Paul. Best info now leaked is movie 1 of 3 (cont'd...)

  • Google Gabriella Carlesi. She is a forensic scientist with a long list of respectable credentials. Last year, she performed an analysis of photos taken before 1966 and after 1967, focusing on the shape of the skull, the breadth of the hard palate, teeth, and ear cartilage. Her hope was to put to an end the rumors that Paul had died, but to her surprise, her investigations showed that they very likely ARE two different people.

    Some conspiracies are rubbish, but not all. This is of the latter.

  • @phoenixshade3 I definitely see the differences in the paul from 65 to 67. I remember being a 5 year old kid looking at the sgt pepper album saying "There's something definitely different about Paul"

    Who knows if he's dead or not . But I'm certain that the guy , at the very least , on the Sgt Pepper album is different from the one on the Help album

  • @phoenixshade3 and how you know If he really made it,I think it is just make up of people,they said that Gabriella performed analyst,that their theory was truthfull,sorry but it is still the same Paul,the same manners,smile,laugh,gesture etc

  • when you take two different pics the same person they surely doesnt much,OMG this is so stupidity,I never heard biggest 

  • that's fucking bullshit!!! paul is not dead... the video is old with low quality and it doesn't mean that he's dead!!!! stop saying such a nonsense

  • Lemme get this straight: people decide to repair a very cool but very damaged interview with Paul using digital technology, and that proves beyond any reasonable doubt that he died, simply because the image is no longer flaky and stretched? My super 8 films from when I was a baby have been digitalized and repaired as well. My face no longer looks stretched and wavy and crackly... gee, it must mean I'm dead!! I mean, the man's fingerprints are the same! PID theorists REALLY need to get a grip.

  • Your giving us a bad name with this video. What's in your head?

  • Your mental, if you believe this, Seriously, you have no life so you use conspiracy theories to use as your excuse of a sad lonely life.

  • what moron made this video?

  • @HimMa14 your brother, triying to tell you the trhuth, but your a moron!

  • I think that Paul is dead. The Real Paul. But this is bullshit. It was taken from the original full frame and rebroadcsat in hd. I do this stuff a lot with full frame tv shows that are full frame and make them into wide screen. It makes the face look smaller. Plus the hair is cut off at the top and so is the bottom of the video. You guys know nothing about video editing and full and widescreen.

  • coincido con felipegcs el problema de la grabacion es q es muy vieja y se ve distorsionado nada mas es como las pelis q salian en vhs con el tiempo se gastaban pero con las remasterizacion se recupera eso es todo paul no murio desen cuenta q cuando empezo con the beatles solo tenia 18 y amigos con el paso de los años cambiamos bajamos de peso o subimos etc, y paul siempre tuvo ojos verdes se le veian marrones solo por el blanco y negro de la tv de esos años

  • the eyebrows!!

  • the first tape is a couple of generations old... that's the ONLY reason his head looks so strange + the aspect ratio has been changed from 4:3 to 5:4

  • Great work!

  • Acá tengo que discrepar, faulisalive. Piensa que el video original está en mala calidad, por lo que no muestra la imagen como era en realidad, sino que muestra la imagen distorsionada; y el remasterizar por lo que entiendo lo que hace es "recuperar" la imagen original, no trucarla. Como lo que pasa con la remasterización de los discos.

    O sea, es el ORIGINAL el que mostraría una imagen como NO era en realidad: mostraría a Paul con una cara diferente, con lo que parecería otra persona.

  • 2. Well... IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR THE OPTICALS LAWS AND FOR MATHEMATIC PARAMETERS TO OBTAIN TWO PEOPLE IN MOVING DOING EXACTLY THE SAME MOVEMENTS ... particularly in the time of this "two" videos... no way man!! except THE TRUTH NOW about FAUL (and unfortunately the other two fabs) IS AN EVIL PERSON.

  • I think Faul is evil, too :-(

  • i was alive at the time and have always been considered crazy, because I truely believe that Paul is dead. Paul, today, is an imposter! You can never convince me that the man that wrote Fool on the Hill wrote Silly Love Songs! Like John Lennon said, "The sound you make is muzak to my ears."

  • I think Paul has been dead since 1966.

  • Hmm...don't you think Fool On The Hill was written after 1967? I was published on Magical Mystery Tour which came AFTER Sgt Pepper...the album this guy named Faul first appears. Psst...the same person who wrote Silly Love Songs is the same person who wrote Fool On The Hill...in fact, he's the same person who wrote Love Me Do...HAHAHAHA.

  • @ProudCeltic Oh, baloney!

  • @faillblogkeyboardcat I may not be in your age group, but in my line of work (Photo Forensic Analysis) its easy stuff for me to see its CLEARLY 2 different people. I've studied this whole "Paul is Dead" thing and, I gotta tell ya, its someone else.

  • @SirBentley3000 You must be a really sucky photo forensic analysist cause those 2 are the same exact person

  • @faillblogkeyboardcat Paul is the same Paul, but he couldn't wrote songs like fool on the hill anymore becasue John Lennon was the sould of The Beatles, and without him, Paul McCartney is not The Beatles.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more