Just another example of the "Running scared christian" they can see the writing is on the wall. To sread such lies is just awful, with the only goal to poison the weak minded into faith without reason.
I didn't watch the video. But seeing the number of dislikes I would like to state one thing.
Examining DNA of the great apes has lead geneticists to actually see how and when our 24th pair of chromosomes merged and strayed from the Hominidae. A pretty obvious HINT.
we cant prove that fossils had offspring??? well seen as the only time i see new lives emergng in the biological world is through BIRTH! then i can safely assume that the fossil individual had parents, therefore i can safely assume that the species population is reproducing.
@haz020190 No, we can't prove they were different. Actually, if you really think about it, how do you really know that a certain creature wasn't barren? You don't. So don't act like I'm an idiot.
"therefore i can safely assume that the species population is reproducing." That's right. But the point in question is whether the 'reproductions' are changing.
@jesse8857 different ??? when did i mention different??
so you agree that we can safely assume that the species as whole was reproducing? it doesnt matter if the individual that died wasnt barren, as it can be assumed it wsnt the only one of its kind. thats a start i guess.
Theres relly nothing else to add, the populations are reproducing, we see grdual changes in the fossil record... whats more to argue??
@haz020190 "different ??? when did i mention different??" I did. That's where the argument comes from....
"we see grdual changes in the fossil record" Fossil record? Isn't that what we're arguing about? Fossils cannot prove anything since you can't tell if any are related! I suggest seeing this video if you are really open to the prospect of evolution being wrong: /watch?v=iNdhAYVtaDM
fine. here is the logic we use to assume that they are:
in living species we can look at say, different species of pig,deer, fish, ape, bird, dog or whatever. And assume that they are related due to similar morphologies.
when we do DNA testing this is confirmed. therefore we conclude tat animals that are clearly of the same group and have similar morphologies are, in the vast majority of cases. closely related.... (cont)
Creationists, so desperate, always grasping at pathetic little straws, but their arguments never hold up. Its so sad, these deluded people. They just can't get their minds into the 21st century, but are stuck instead back around 1800.
@jesse8857 How hairy we were isn't the question. Evolution happened, and is still happening. Every living thing evolves, generally the more complex the organism, the longer the process takes.
@8698gil "Evolution happened" Based on? ....hairy people etc? Isn't this begging the question?!
"and is still happening" The changes you observe do not require new information - which is what evolution is all about. Thus - not evolution (in the microbes to man sense)
I'm a christian and I believe in evolution. Honestly I can't deny it's happening and will happen in the future. The story of Adam and Eve are in a time line of evolution. Only the story was passed down and that was probably the way the written it. I love being a great ape. We have so many features and vestigial genes that convinces me. I was going to be the scientist to "disprove" it, but I ended up believing in it and loving it lol there is truly nothing wrong with it. It's beautiful.
@whitewolfwithblackSP Could you comment on my channel page giving a list of all the evidences that convince you? Like, you don't have to explain them - just 'elephant hurl'. I'll see if I can answer them. but watch this first watch?v=iNdhAYVtaDM
The bad thing about evolution is that 75% of christians lose their faith after one year of college because of evolution theory.
@whitewolfwithblackSP "We have so many features and vestigial genes that convinces me." Well, unfortunately for you, these have been disproven! check out our channel for more
"It's beautiful." What? God using death and misfits over millions of years to accomplish his goal?
if this is all liable, why is EVOLUTION A FACT? why has it been credited as a FACT and not a THEORY??? Many scientist suck but all the successful ones are evolutionists and many of these have become legends and have 'best seller' books because th evidence has become overwealming to the opint of absolute cernanty which is unfortunate for you FACT DENIERS
I am an evolutionist... but i am also christian, god and evolution go hand and hand believe it or not, i admire your beleifs as well as i do others.Evolution made us, but god made evolution, so yes in a way GOD DID MAKE US...
Just another example of the "Running scared christian" they can see the writing is on the wall. To sread such lies is just awful, with the only goal to poison the weak minded into faith without reason.
currie1967 1 month ago
@currie1967 Just another example of an evolutionist asserting without backing evidence
jesse8857 1 month ago
I didn't watch the video. But seeing the number of dislikes I would like to state one thing.
Examining DNA of the great apes has lead geneticists to actually see how and when our 24th pair of chromosomes merged and strayed from the Hominidae. A pretty obvious HINT.
MetalAnonym0us 2 months ago
@MetalAnonym0us I assume you are talking about the fusion. EvolutionDismantled has a great vid on it: /watch?v=GxYxGxx7AuI
jesse8857 2 months ago
we cant prove that fossils had offspring??? well seen as the only time i see new lives emergng in the biological world is through BIRTH! then i can safely assume that the fossil individual had parents, therefore i can safely assume that the species population is reproducing.
haz020190 2 months ago
@haz020190 No, we can't prove they were different. Actually, if you really think about it, how do you really know that a certain creature wasn't barren? You don't. So don't act like I'm an idiot.
"therefore i can safely assume that the species population is reproducing." That's right. But the point in question is whether the 'reproductions' are changing.
jesse8857 2 months ago
@jesse8857 different ??? when did i mention different??
so you agree that we can safely assume that the species as whole was reproducing? it doesnt matter if the individual that died wasnt barren, as it can be assumed it wsnt the only one of its kind. thats a start i guess.
Theres relly nothing else to add, the populations are reproducing, we see grdual changes in the fossil record... whats more to argue??
haz020190 2 months ago
@haz020190 "different ??? when did i mention different??" I did. That's where the argument comes from....
"we see grdual changes in the fossil record" Fossil record? Isn't that what we're arguing about? Fossils cannot prove anything since you can't tell if any are related! I suggest seeing this video if you are really open to the prospect of evolution being wrong: /watch?v=iNdhAYVtaDM
jesse8857 1 month ago
@jesse8857 we cant prove that theyre related?
fine. here is the logic we use to assume that they are:
in living species we can look at say, different species of pig,deer, fish, ape, bird, dog or whatever. And assume that they are related due to similar morphologies.
when we do DNA testing this is confirmed. therefore we conclude tat animals that are clearly of the same group and have similar morphologies are, in the vast majority of cases. closely related.... (cont)
haz020190 1 month ago
@haz020190 Why aren't seals and sea lions related? Watch this video debunking the logic of similarities: watch?v=qlOdGG4BJnU
We can't DNA test any extinct fossils.
jesse8857 1 month ago
@jesse8857 (cont) now you tell me if you will. why we should assume that this same standard does not aply to animals that are now extinct??
If you can give me a reason then I may actually be open to evolution being wrong.
haz020190 1 month ago
@haz020190 Sorry, I'm lost in about 100 comment wars. What is the "standard" you are talking about?
jesse8857 1 month ago
@jesse8857 The fossil record clearly shows populations changing.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz That's completely true.
jesse8857 1 month ago
Creationists, so desperate, always grasping at pathetic little straws, but their arguments never hold up. Its so sad, these deluded people. They just can't get their minds into the 21st century, but are stuck instead back around 1800.
8698gil 3 months ago
@8698gil really? perhaps you ought to check out this /watch?v=iNdhAYVtaDM I'd hardly call it grasping at straws.
Rather, its the evolutionists that grasp at straws! For instance, the new "proof" that evolution happened - hairy people! baloney
jesse8857 3 months ago
@jesse8857 How hairy we were isn't the question. Evolution happened, and is still happening. Every living thing evolves, generally the more complex the organism, the longer the process takes.
8698gil 3 months ago
@8698gil "Evolution happened" Based on? ....hairy people etc? Isn't this begging the question?!
"and is still happening" The changes you observe do not require new information - which is what evolution is all about. Thus - not evolution (in the microbes to man sense)
jesse8857 3 months ago
@jesse8857 Whatever. I really don't care what you believe. But you're wrong.
8698gil 3 months ago
I'm a christian and I believe in evolution. Honestly I can't deny it's happening and will happen in the future. The story of Adam and Eve are in a time line of evolution. Only the story was passed down and that was probably the way the written it. I love being a great ape. We have so many features and vestigial genes that convinces me. I was going to be the scientist to "disprove" it, but I ended up believing in it and loving it lol there is truly nothing wrong with it. It's beautiful.
whitewolfwithblackSP 6 months ago 7
@whitewolfwithblackSP Could you comment on my channel page giving a list of all the evidences that convince you? Like, you don't have to explain them - just 'elephant hurl'. I'll see if I can answer them. but watch this first watch?v=iNdhAYVtaDM
The bad thing about evolution is that 75% of christians lose their faith after one year of college because of evolution theory.
jesse8857 5 months ago
@whitewolfwithblackSP "We have so many features and vestigial genes that convinces me." Well, unfortunately for you, these have been disproven! check out our channel for more
"It's beautiful." What? God using death and misfits over millions of years to accomplish his goal?
EvolutionDismantled 3 months ago
@EvolutionDismantled You haven't disproven anything. And yes it is beautiful.
whitewolfwithblackSP 3 months ago
if this is all liable, why is EVOLUTION A FACT? why has it been credited as a FACT and not a THEORY??? Many scientist suck but all the successful ones are evolutionists and many of these have become legends and have 'best seller' books because th evidence has become overwealming to the opint of absolute cernanty which is unfortunate for you FACT DENIERS
bluffr22 6 months ago
@bluffr22 Yes, why IS evolution a fact? According to the ACTUAL evidence, it is a hypothesis. watch?v=iNdhAYVtaDM
jesse8857 5 months ago
We are all apes dumb ASS that is kinda the point. Are going to be the last homo sapein religiousosis to evolve?
cadeere74 6 months ago
@cadeere74 "We are all apes dumb ASS" The only proof you have for this is your own evolutionary classification system. More circular reasoning
jesse8857 6 months ago
adad
davidstack1982 7 months ago
Why should there be any fossils at all? It's only luck that we have a few, and you don't need a single fossil to prove evolution occurred.
mikemcdonald113 7 months ago
Consider this. The bible is one huge parable. And nothing (but the moral tales) should be taken literarly.
I am atheist, however. And after watching this video, im appalled! Pure propeganda, bamboozaling the layman with nonsense!
HOMO ERECTUS they where human! PAH!!
If they where it means creation earth is much older you say.
It also means our anatomy changed significantly aswell over the years. ie......Evolution Baby!
davidstack1982 7 months ago 5
@davidstack1982 "The bible is one huge parable" And what has lead you to this conclusion?
"PAH!!" You obviously ignored the quotes from paleoanthropologists (who know what they're saying) then.
"creation earth is much older you say." Why? Radiometric dating has unprovable assumptions (all of which, have evidence against them).
"It also means our anatomy changed significantly aswell...Evolution Baby!" No, this is only micro-evolution. Which is not real evolution at all!
jesse8857 7 months ago
I am an evolutionist... but i am also christian, god and evolution go hand and hand believe it or not, i admire your beleifs as well as i do others.Evolution made us, but god made evolution, so yes in a way GOD DID MAKE US...
mrhmeister 8 months ago
@mrhmeister I really think evolution is not compatible with the bible, but I would like to see your reasons... And it's good your a Christian too
jesse8857 8 months ago