Lec 30 | MIT 18.01 Single Variable Calculus, Fall 2007

[ttttrigg3r]

I had to look up the word recalcitrant

[melisantika]

I am very happy to see the vidoe from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You Lecture 30: Integration by parts, reduction formulae Instructor: David Jerison

[Onepissite]

I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this Integration by parts, reduction formulae

[Ondelendo]

I Love The Video Lecture 30: Integration by parts, reduction formulae It Can Increase My Knowledge

[bebeheuy]

Steady I Really Like This Video Integration by parts, reduction formulae

[willamricard]

Nice Video Lecture 30: Integration by parts, reduction formulae That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You

[imegatrone]

I Really Like The Video Integration by parts, reduction formulae From Your

[anakmudajaman]

after i watched this video, my insight is very open because the video is very good to give information Lecture 30: Integration by parts, reduction formulae

[flowewritharoma]

last lecture . awesome lecture.

[agapitoflores001]

Malufet! This rocks!

[nomchews]

Also Sir made a mistake at 17:00, int dx / a^2 + x^2 = 1/a*tan^-1(x/a)+c

i.e. the answer in this case is, 1/root2*tan^-1(x+1/root2)+c

and also the fact he refers to it as complex is a joke. I bet he cringes while saying that.

[nomchews]

Lecture 30? Really? Please tell me this is some type of 'maths for dummies' course at MIT or else the America mathematical education system seriously lacks. I learnt this at 16 in Australia (And No I wasn't "accelerated").

[ohfcukchris]

@nomchews I don't think you're qualified to be taking shots at an MIT professor.

[Azuresong]

@nomchews yeah 'retarded' comes to mind

[patridix14]

Integration using the Reduction Formula starts at 27:45

[MikeDunn]

Single Variable Calculus? Multi-Variable Calculus? Can't we just say Calc 1, Calc 2, or Calc 3 instead of coming up with fancy names?

[markkerollos]

@MikeDunn The names aren't fancy, they're explanatory. Single variable calculus is just what the name says it is, calculus involving only one variable. I'm sure you can figure out the other one. Calc 1 or calc 2 don't tell you what the subject is actually about.

[MikeDunn]

@markkerollos I know that, chief. But the rest of the country calls it "Calc 1" or "Calc 2", and people pretty much know what it is.

[markkerollos]

@MikeDunn That's good and all for people in the US, but you must realise that as an online thing it will be accessed from people outside the US such as myself to who "calc 1" has no meaning.

[amaduddinwatto]

THIS PROFEESOR OF MATHEMATICS IS NICE

I WANT TO GIVE HIM TIPS BEING A STUDENT

PLEASE SIR ALWAYS ATTEMPT THOSE QUESTIONS WHICH YOU SOLVE ON BLACK BOARD

OTHERWISE DON'T ATTEMPT

I LIKED YOUR WAY OF TEACHING BUT YOU WILL GET SOME TIME TO BE PROFESSOR WALTER LEWIN

HE WAS LEGEND

YOU SHOULD SEE HIS LECTURES TO TEACH STUDENTS AS AN EXAMPLE

I LOVE TO BE AN AUSTRONAUT TO WATCH YOUR PROGRAMMES

[usayeed727]

@ 50:18

Now I see, guess I made the same mistake. It is -1.

[usayeed727]

@ 49:17 when he writes (-1) is actually correct. Why's it +1 when -e0 is -(1) seeing as e0 is 1? Great lecture though, seriously interesting. Makes me kind of want to do Mathematics in University, and I know this is just one lecture, but it doesn't seem to be as hard as I thought it would be. I guess it's just the fact that most people hate Math and find it super difficult, but I found this lecture enjoyable! Lol, sometimes can't believe I'm one to love Maths...

[robtef]

Integration by parts starts at around 18:40

[scbaldwin13]

damnit, he lost me at trig substitution...

[ACANOFSODA]

Lol.. I love advanced guessing. I shall pass that term to every known individual!

[Starrynova]

woohoo integration by parts...how exciting...reminds me of the lecture I had a week ago!

[Rejoyces]

but it only lasts for the first few minutes, its gets better

[mitfutstudent]

yes

[MathMikie]

the crackling in this video is annoying

[risti1209]

@MathMikie then turn on cc and mute it