either you're making a joke or *you* are stupid. o_O
lead only blocks radiation if it's in the way between the radiation and the detector, which it is not in this case. that's why they put a lead apron ON you when you're having an x-ray exam, instead of leaving it just in the corner or on the table next to you... it's only useful if it's between YOU and the BEAM, same as it'd only block rays if it was between the SOURCE and the GEIGER MUELLER TUBE in this video...
hottest reading? hmm, 3000 uSv/h in a nuclear medicine operating room (brachytherapy) watch?v=xJaJUtHO4bI - and about 5,000,000 uSv/h (5 Sv/h) from an x-ray device.
background radiation in my apartment is not increased with proper shielding in place. i got a HUGE amount of diver's lead (lead bricks; very handy, you can just duct-tape them together and put them around stuff) for that, plus a steel safe for the smaller sources, like these disc sources etc.
that's not a bad idea actually! gamma rays are very penetrating, so really most of them will move THROUGH the mirror instead of being deflected - but there were experiments for gamma deflection with a very special kind of mirror, i remember reading about... cant remember what it was exactly off the top of my head, but yeah.
What is the orientation of the magnets? I am guessing they are opposing N N or S S arrangement or else the lead clip would deform violently and the magnets snap together. Electrons enhancing the counter are like a microwave oven using HV pulsed DC current to oscillate through a tuned chamber to cook the food. Like blowing air across the neck of a bottle to make a sound only at the GHz range. The magnets are the 'air pressure' and the DC follows the right-hand rule.
Nice! 5/5! Do you have any B+ (Positron) emitters, Like Sodium-22 i.e.? Have you ever thought of taking a B- & a B+ source, & using magnets to bend them in the right direction to cause Electron-Positron Annihilation? I was wondering, if you set up a magnetic tube made of something magnetic like Iron, and encase the tube in strong Nd ring magnets around the tube, similar to a particle accelerator, & put a small hole in the tube and put the sources into the tube. It's just an idea I want to try.
@KarbineKyle Positron-electron annihilation happens immediately the moment a positron appears. You don't need magnets for that. A PET scanner detects the annihilation quants generated by for instance 18 Fluor-glucose positrons combining with electrons that are abundantly present. This annihilation result in 0,55 MeV gamma radiation.
can I please have this video for my page and videos on gamma rays,particle accelerators,cosmic rays etc, and for my theory/explanation on how E=MC^2 being incorrect
true, i have more than enough gamma-rays around that i should worry about already. ;-)
thats another thing i want to do a video on - bremsstrahlung. i've tried it with caesium 137 and got no noticeable result; but maybe Sr-90 will work better, as there are no gammas initially that could interfere with the measured bremsstrahlung quantums.
Next thing: correct me if I am wrong but a good way to get a large amounts of electrons/betas is obtaining a high voltage vacuum tube of some sort - like the first models of Roentgen tube (Crookes tube), but without the plate emitting X-rays. If its true, does it makes an X-ray tube a simple linear accelerator of some sort?
BTW: when I read that you plan doing that I tried do do it too, but I had only alfa emiter so ofcourse I failed (maybe a vacuum chamber would help ;) .
well, considering an x-ray tube is the same thing as a TV (crt, not flatscreen, of course), i guess it could possibly be called a linear accelerator; but i'm not sure, as no acceleration actually happens within the tube, but only deflection; the electrons have their speed (energy) due to the 25 kV supplied by the flyback transformer.
the only difference in an x-ray tube is that it is not shielded (TVs use graphite and lead glass), AND the emitted radiation is much harder due to higher energy; x-ray tubes are supplied with 40-80 kV for typical applications. of course, a normal rectifier-diode cannot handle the voltage an x-ray tube can, but from the basic architecture, they're the same.
disclaimer: i am relatively new to this and do not guarantee the accuracy of the information supplied. ;-)
Could you please draw the next time lines of magnetic filed and polarisation of the magnets? That would help to demonstrate the Lorentz force.
And now theoretical question: if I had a sort of coilgun closed in a form of torus, could I make a simple particle accelerator for the beta particles/electrons? Can magnetic field give them kinetic energy or only deflect them? I know ofcourse about syncrotrons but they use electric fields. Is this achievable with magnetic field too?
bedenke auch, dass DU es jeden tag mit giftigen stoffen zu tun hast... und das im schlimmsten fall, ohne es zu wissen. bedenke auch, dass dein leben irgendwann einen toedlichen ausgang haben wird. ueber die strasse gehen ist gefaehrlich! wenn du vor lauter angst lieber ein langes, aber langweiliges leben haben willst, okay - ich auf jeden fall trinke heute abend 2-3 bier und verkuerze mein leben durch das gift ethanol um weitere 4 minuten. vielleicht krieg ich ja leberkrebs...
QIf I had my mouth and stomach full of iron, and in the ceiling full of neodymium magnets, wud I by floating, if the gravitational pull from the earth and the magnets would be equal?
uh, i guess that'd be very hard to archive. assuming you weight 60 kilos or more and the magnetic field is strong enough to pull you up, it is very likely that either the iron would tear you to bits or, if it's not sharp enough, would at least squish your inner organs (the stomach is close to the heart, for example), so you'd be hanging like a meat puppet, dying from internal bleeding. ^_^
okay...In our school there is an small earth model(dun remember how its called:D), It has two electromagnets- one on top, and one in the bottom. The earth model floats in the air :D, the thing is amazing, since its veryhard to achive this 0 gravity thing x0
OMG! Now if you back-calculate the intensity of the magnetic field by determining the larmor radius of the curved beta particles, I will shit on the floor!
I bet you get lots of marriage proposals.
glasstronic 5 months ago
Fascinating
peppeddu 7 months ago
Well done experiment.
electrodacus 9 months ago
Ehmm... i guess you are just doing a joke or you are stupid.... lead or plumb is blocking radiation as everybordy knows.
Madowstone 10 months ago
@Madowstone
either you're making a joke or *you* are stupid. o_O
lead only blocks radiation if it's in the way between the radiation and the detector, which it is not in this case. that's why they put a lead apron ON you when you're having an x-ray exam, instead of leaving it just in the corner or on the table next to you... it's only useful if it's between YOU and the BEAM, same as it'd only block rays if it was between the SOURCE and the GEIGER MUELLER TUBE in this video...
bionerd23 9 months ago
@bionerd23 You think that particels move in straight lines, but they do not move in straight lines, that your error.
Madowstone 9 months ago
what is the hottest reading youve ever gotten? and have you noticed BR of your apartment raised?
carpetmonk 10 months ago
@carpetmonk
hottest reading? hmm, 3000 uSv/h in a nuclear medicine operating room (brachytherapy) watch?v=xJaJUtHO4bI - and about 5,000,000 uSv/h (5 Sv/h) from an x-ray device.
background radiation in my apartment is not increased with proper shielding in place. i got a HUGE amount of diver's lead (lead bricks; very handy, you can just duct-tape them together and put them around stuff) for that, plus a steel safe for the smaller sources, like these disc sources etc.
bionerd23 10 months ago
If Gama is a photon, (light) use a makeup mirror as a deflector!
mythhealer 10 months ago
@mythhealer
that's not a bad idea actually! gamma rays are very penetrating, so really most of them will move THROUGH the mirror instead of being deflected - but there were experiments for gamma deflection with a very special kind of mirror, i remember reading about... cant remember what it was exactly off the top of my head, but yeah.
bionerd23 9 months ago
how can you touch those things without getting radiation sickness?
TrappeTrinn 10 months ago
If I used that dosimeter, it would be in my school to check that radiation is not getting me depressed.
jjovereats 1 year ago
What is the orientation of the magnets? I am guessing they are opposing N N or S S arrangement or else the lead clip would deform violently and the magnets snap together. Electrons enhancing the counter are like a microwave oven using HV pulsed DC current to oscillate through a tuned chamber to cook the food. Like blowing air across the neck of a bottle to make a sound only at the GHz range. The magnets are the 'air pressure' and the DC follows the right-hand rule.
sovageek 1 year ago
Thanks for all the interesting videos.
I was just looking at the CCD experiment vid and it reminded me of some Chernobyl videos where you can see flashes on the recording aswell.
zs6djm 1 year ago
Ema576, I think you ate thinking of gravity...
graymalkin1234 1 year ago
acualy light has mass and is a=effected by magnetic fields, thats why there are stars we can see all year.
ema576 1 year ago
light is not a charged particle, therefore the lorentz force has no influence on it.
And what do stars around the north pole have to do with magnetic fields?
sciencoking 1 year ago 2
Nice! 5/5! Do you have any B+ (Positron) emitters, Like Sodium-22 i.e.? Have you ever thought of taking a B- & a B+ source, & using magnets to bend them in the right direction to cause Electron-Positron Annihilation? I was wondering, if you set up a magnetic tube made of something magnetic like Iron, and encase the tube in strong Nd ring magnets around the tube, similar to a particle accelerator, & put a small hole in the tube and put the sources into the tube. It's just an idea I want to try.
KarbineKyle 2 years ago
i think magnets strong enough for a particle accelerator would just kill my computer and stuff, lol. ;)
i do not currently have a positron emitter, nope, but i'll surely do a video if i ever get my hands on one!
bionerd23 2 years ago 2
@KarbineKyle Positron-electron annihilation happens immediately the moment a positron appears. You don't need magnets for that. A PET scanner detects the annihilation quants generated by for instance 18 Fluor-glucose positrons combining with electrons that are abundantly present. This annihilation result in 0,55 MeV gamma radiation.
AJApper 10 months ago
barium or the other element radioactive? :?
vitorix24 2 years ago
barium 133 is a radioisotope of barium, so yes, it is radioactive. same as strontium 90 and caesium 137.
bionerd23 2 years ago
yes i know! lol. but... ceasium radioactive... hum... its react with water, air( oxigen an nitrogen) :D
vitorix24 2 years ago
they will continue their lives as helium atoms, and refuse to participate in my little experiment LOL
pioneerz450 2 years ago 5
Thank you for your very interesting videos! ;-)
Gheven1 2 years ago
can I please have this video?
sn1pe352 2 years ago
go to keepvid dottt comm, and you can have ANY youtube video. =)
bionerd23 2 years ago
@bionerd23 hi,where can i find these discs of radioisotopes?
BOROPHRYNUS 10 months ago
maby you should of put the gamma scout pointed to one of the polles
clony101 2 years ago
omg you have never fliped the disk sourse before
clony101 2 years ago
I think I'm in love with you
sn1pe352 2 years ago 8
Which way are the poles of the magnets aligned in the video? Also, is that your radium watch on your wrist?
amethyst8teen 2 years ago
i think the one facing away from the camera while the deflection is picked up by the gamma scout SHOULD be the northpole.
i am not wearing my radium watch at random; it's too fragile, e.g. not water resistant. the watch i am always wearing is a binary watch. :-)
bionerd23 2 years ago
will the gamma scout measure radiation in counts per minute?
jrbpyro101 2 years ago
yup, it is capable of doing that... and counts per five minutes, or counts per hour, or whatever you want to set it to.
bionerd23 2 years ago
can I please have this video for my page and videos on gamma rays,particle accelerators,cosmic rays etc, and for my theory/explanation on how E=MC^2 being incorrect
sn1pe352 2 years ago
sure, embedding is enabled.
bionerd23 2 years ago
Be careful placing beta emitters near lead. You don't wanna create too many x-rays.
Ch3mG33k 2 years ago
true, i have more than enough gamma-rays around that i should worry about already. ;-)
thats another thing i want to do a video on - bremsstrahlung. i've tried it with caesium 137 and got no noticeable result; but maybe Sr-90 will work better, as there are no gammas initially that could interfere with the measured bremsstrahlung quantums.
bionerd23 2 years ago
hey, ich hab dir schon ne nachricht geschrieben, doch ich wollte lieber 2ma fragen:
Wo kriegst du denn eigentlich deine isotope her; auch die "ungefährlichen", wie quecksilber oder zinn usw.
Blinkwing 2 years ago
die seite heißt WE-WE-WE-PUNKT-unitednuclear-PUNKT-KOMM
sciencoking 2 years ago
ja so dumm bin ich auch net, sry, aber die liefern nur innerhalb amerika xD
Blinkwing 2 years ago
hmmm.... das könnte unter umständen schwierig sein... :S
sciencoking 2 years ago
ja, wo kriegst du dei denn her?
Blinkwing 2 years ago
ich hab ja gar keine :P
sciencoking 2 years ago
Next thing: correct me if I am wrong but a good way to get a large amounts of electrons/betas is obtaining a high voltage vacuum tube of some sort - like the first models of Roentgen tube (Crookes tube), but without the plate emitting X-rays. If its true, does it makes an X-ray tube a simple linear accelerator of some sort?
BTW: when I read that you plan doing that I tried do do it too, but I had only alfa emiter so ofcourse I failed (maybe a vacuum chamber would help ;) .
LechuCzechu 2 years ago
well, considering an x-ray tube is the same thing as a TV (crt, not flatscreen, of course), i guess it could possibly be called a linear accelerator; but i'm not sure, as no acceleration actually happens within the tube, but only deflection; the electrons have their speed (energy) due to the 25 kV supplied by the flyback transformer.
bionerd23 2 years ago
the only difference in an x-ray tube is that it is not shielded (TVs use graphite and lead glass), AND the emitted radiation is much harder due to higher energy; x-ray tubes are supplied with 40-80 kV for typical applications. of course, a normal rectifier-diode cannot handle the voltage an x-ray tube can, but from the basic architecture, they're the same.
disclaimer: i am relatively new to this and do not guarantee the accuracy of the information supplied. ;-)
bionerd23 2 years ago
Could you please draw the next time lines of magnetic filed and polarisation of the magnets? That would help to demonstrate the Lorentz force.
And now theoretical question: if I had a sort of coilgun closed in a form of torus, could I make a simple particle accelerator for the beta particles/electrons? Can magnetic field give them kinetic energy or only deflect them? I know ofcourse about syncrotrons but they use electric fields. Is this achievable with magnetic field too?
LechuCzechu 2 years ago
uhm, i can try - my drawing skills arent all that great, you see. but good idea.
well, you can accelerate electrons in a magentic field, yes - look up cyclotron, it has been done about a century ago already. :-)
bionerd23 2 years ago
bedenke nochmal, dass du jeden tag mit giftigen stoffen zu tun hast.
irgendwann artet das mal in hautkrebs oder anderen krankheiten aus !
wenn michael jackson schon nur wegen handcremes in jahrzehnten hautkrebs bekommt, was wird dann mit dir geschehen ?
irgendwann wirst du einsichtig sein, aber dann kann es schon zu spät sein !
dein hobby ist gefährlich !
bedenke es
Freeman101 2 years ago
bedenke auch, dass DU es jeden tag mit giftigen stoffen zu tun hast... und das im schlimmsten fall, ohne es zu wissen. bedenke auch, dass dein leben irgendwann einen toedlichen ausgang haben wird. ueber die strasse gehen ist gefaehrlich! wenn du vor lauter angst lieber ein langes, aber langweiliges leben haben willst, okay - ich auf jeden fall trinke heute abend 2-3 bier und verkuerze mein leben durch das gift ethanol um weitere 4 minuten. vielleicht krieg ich ja leberkrebs...
no offense. :-)
bionerd23 2 years ago
QIf I had my mouth and stomach full of iron, and in the ceiling full of neodymium magnets, wud I by floating, if the gravitational pull from the earth and the magnets would be equal?
JaksProductions 2 years ago
uh, i guess that'd be very hard to archive. assuming you weight 60 kilos or more and the magnetic field is strong enough to pull you up, it is very likely that either the iron would tear you to bits or, if it's not sharp enough, would at least squish your inner organs (the stomach is close to the heart, for example), so you'd be hanging like a meat puppet, dying from internal bleeding. ^_^
bionerd23 2 years ago
okay...In our school there is an small earth model(dun remember how its called:D), It has two electromagnets- one on top, and one in the bottom. The earth model floats in the air :D, the thing is amazing, since its veryhard to achive this 0 gravity thing x0
JaksProductions 2 years ago
a small not an sorry :(
JaksProductions 2 years ago
OMG! Now if you back-calculate the intensity of the magnetic field by determining the larmor radius of the curved beta particles, I will shit on the floor!
10mintwo 2 years ago
lol, i wont do that, dont worry... i'm pretty bad at maths. your floor will stay nice and clean. =)
bionerd23 2 years ago
Wow, I never imagined that the magnetic deflection would be so easily detectable like that, it made a huge difference! Awesome as always =P
AScannerClearly 2 years ago
2:45 RANDOMNESS FTW lol
i´d say this was a complete SUCCESS!!! :D amazing! 5*
sciencoking 2 years ago
interesting... i should try this but on a much smaller scale with americium
polonium9 2 years ago