@BLLAARRRGG seems all you care about is kissing the ass of those controling us..... the government is there to protect us from each other not from ourselves, if one wants to smoke pot well FUCKING A he should be allowed to do it.
He will in the end get fired and if some how he keeps his job they will then help him quit. He has to follow orders is the bottom line. If he keeps his job 10 to 1 says they stick him on the night shifts and all the dead end details.Or no one will respond as back up when he calls for it. He seems like a hot headed person who always has to be right and wants things his way. Wake me up at 1am and I'll kick the shit out of you cop or no cop.
This officer like many pro freedom advocates never miss an opportunity to plug "democracy" So he swore to uphold the constitution but seems he has failed to read it.
How are people so blind. Even withing the department, if anyone attempts to expose the truth or question authority they jump on you quicker than a G20 summit. All worship the state!
Sorry I am not sorry. But this is such a petty childish joke. Does anyone take him seriously as the suit reads off that paper. This things are petty and reak of "I'm gonna tell mama on you".
Listen, as a loyal Ridley Report viewer for the last two years I feel as if I have invested enough time watching these reports to know when I see a bad one. And this docu-drama mini series is bad.
Doesn't Ridley have a right to know how his viewers feel about the content? A little feedback and constructive criticism will only make the Report better.
I'm just trying to make this thing better. If you don't like that then you go away!
So the "free state" movement is your ark of the covenant? Or maybe you were referring to the Ridley Report as your ark?
I'm not big believer in the "free state" movement. If it were to fall and crash to the ground I wouldn't be too upset about it. I have no desire or interest in steadying that "ark."
I enjoy the discussions here on the Report and I want to see the quality and content of the videos improve. You call that "ark steadying."
We all have our own views on how best to achieve liberty in our lifetime. I'm sure as time goes by, the more effective methods will pick up steam and less effective means will fall by the wayside. Even if at that point people still pick up and attempt less effective methodologies, I will be gracious to them as that is doing far, far more than the vast majority of 'liberty activists'.
The current chief is a policy wonk, a large piggy who is terrified of losing his job due to his own ineptitude and inability to prove any real case against Jardis, instead releying on a droll, rote expurgation of Jardis's service record only showing means-based entries. This is usually attributed to persons suffering from a syphylitic acumen, and such a personality is not user-freindly to the public for which he is entrusted to serve rightly and fairly.
i tottaly agree, the police chief is an idiot and the police officer defending himself should be the police chief and run that shit. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORk
Wow, seems the police officer in this video should be the police chief, the chief himself doesn't seem intelligent enough to clean toilets. Get that group out of there. Make this police officer chief.
while i understand your sentiment, why you gotta bring environmental techs down? i clean toilets [among other things] for a living and it does not mean i'm in any way uneducated or destitute.
I mainly meant the Chief and his boy in this video are clearly idiots. I had to fix cars for substandard wages for years, I understand, the positions we take in life are not deserved, backwards upside down country. This chief and his blind minions need removed form their positions.
I was thinking the other day that this chief ought to be the one fired.
If poor judgment is such a serious offense, such that the chief is using it to demonstrate just how vital it is that Jardis' employment be terminated now, why did the chief allow Jardis' poor judgment to continue all these years without doing anything about it? Poor judgment on the chief's part?
Given that the chief has exercised poor judgment for the same length of time as Jardis, the chief ought to be fired, as well.
he has the right to join any group he likes, just as officer jardis does. the question is, does it mean anything if he were a member of the free masons? no. it doesn't. and it seems a huge waste of time to try and conjure up ideas to make it meaningful. what matters are actions and policies in this instance. you're clouding the issue and that is a detriment to this cause.
Its a common trick to say someone is a detriment to the cause. The truth is never a detriment. You are a suspicious character.
Yes, it does matter if he is a freemason. The masons are a government entity in that their members, who are in every level of government, swear an oath to their lodges above their oath to the constitution.
Did this "police chief" ever graduate the 8th grade?
Coffeeandasmoke 6 months ago
Are you sure he didn't say he was going to "Epping" kill you? LOL J/K
Love you guys -- keep up the good work!
1GodOnlyOne 10 months ago
Officer Jardis is a fucking HERO.... a new generation of younger americans coming to take shit over!!! with intellectuality, strength, courage, .....
JARDIS FOR PRESIDENT!
jbudd 1 year ago 2
just comes to show that the majority of cops are fucking power hungry idiots. we need more cops like jardis
themen99 1 year ago 2
seems like all your care about is legalizing pot............
BLLAARRRGG 1 year ago
@BLLAARRRGG seems all you care about is kissing the ass of those controling us..... the government is there to protect us from each other not from ourselves, if one wants to smoke pot well FUCKING A he should be allowed to do it.
jbudd 1 year ago
He wanted to be on the night shift.
rscalzo40 2 years ago
Taxation without Representation = Tyranny
STOP CONSUMPTION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!
On the 11th and now 10th of every month DO NOT SPEND A DIME and PLEASE pass the word.
The family/country you save WILL be your own.
Thx!
UnoRaza 2 years ago
cannabis will be victorious
giantgreenbuddy 2 years ago
"to protect and serve"
They protect the corporation, and serve the special interest.
EastCoastOp 2 years ago 4
He will in the end get fired and if some how he keeps his job they will then help him quit. He has to follow orders is the bottom line. If he keeps his job 10 to 1 says they stick him on the night shifts and all the dead end details.Or no one will respond as back up when he calls for it. He seems like a hot headed person who always has to be right and wants things his way. Wake me up at 1am and I'll kick the shit out of you cop or no cop.
militarysims 2 years ago
I'm lost. Is this cop with us or against us?
SexySex50 2 years ago
This officer like many pro freedom advocates never miss an opportunity to plug "democracy" So he swore to uphold the constitution but seems he has failed to read it.
cdimmm 2 years ago
How are people so blind. Even withing the department, if anyone attempts to expose the truth or question authority they jump on you quicker than a G20 summit. All worship the state!
Anothercoilgun 2 years ago 5
Sorry I am not sorry. But this is such a petty childish joke. Does anyone take him seriously as the suit reads off that paper. This things are petty and reak of "I'm gonna tell mama on you".
Anothercoilgun 2 years ago 2
This "Officer Jardis" documentary series of videos...is not clear to me about it's point.
Once a human goes to work for the govt. their morals will be compromised.
mcgrawtim123 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
With this kind of journalistic integrity, Ridley belongs right at home with Fox News.
p00lman 2 years ago
Ridley is asleep at the "effing" wheel here. Seriously Ridley!!! What the "eff?"
This video is 8 minutes of "blah blah blah... he was going to effing kill me and then he apologized."
This whole mini-series about the anarchist hero cop is turning into the most boring docu-dram I have ever witnessed.
This segment could have been condensed into 30 seconds. I'd rather listen to you editorialize for a few minutes, than this.
Throw your viewers a bone Ridley!
fczwartek 2 years ago
"This whole mini-series about the anarchist hero cop is turning into the most boring docu-dram I have ever witnessed."
Then go away.
"This segment could have been condensed into 30 seconds. I'd rather listen to you editorialize for a few minutes, than this."
Sounds like you are fond of ark-steadying. Make your own "thrilling" docu-drama if you think you could do better.
ed2276 2 years ago
"then go away"
Listen, as a loyal Ridley Report viewer for the last two years I feel as if I have invested enough time watching these reports to know when I see a bad one. And this docu-drama mini series is bad.
Doesn't Ridley have a right to know how his viewers feel about the content? A little feedback and constructive criticism will only make the Report better.
I'm just trying to make this thing better. If you don't like that then you go away!
fczwartek 2 years ago 2
"you are fond of ark-steadying"
So the "free state" movement is your ark of the covenant? Or maybe you were referring to the Ridley Report as your ark?
I'm not big believer in the "free state" movement. If it were to fall and crash to the ground I wouldn't be too upset about it. I have no desire or interest in steadying that "ark."
I enjoy the discussions here on the Report and I want to see the quality and content of the videos improve. You call that "ark steadying."
fczwartek 2 years ago
I love the irony of a "pro-liberty" government enforcement agent......
landofthefreemyass 2 years ago
You're not kidding!
I'm surprised that so many people who hate the government show up at a hearing in support of a government agent.
But I shouldn't be surprised. As other people have pointed out, "free staters" apparently don't really know what they want.
fczwartek 2 years ago
We all have our own views on how best to achieve liberty in our lifetime. I'm sure as time goes by, the more effective methods will pick up steam and less effective means will fall by the wayside. Even if at that point people still pick up and attempt less effective methodologies, I will be gracious to them as that is doing far, far more than the vast majority of 'liberty activists'.
PaulOtt 2 years ago
The current chief is a policy wonk, a large piggy who is terrified of losing his job due to his own ineptitude and inability to prove any real case against Jardis, instead releying on a droll, rote expurgation of Jardis's service record only showing means-based entries. This is usually attributed to persons suffering from a syphylitic acumen, and such a personality is not user-freindly to the public for which he is entrusted to serve rightly and fairly.
In short, Jardis needs a promotion.
ThePresidentialTouch 2 years ago 2
YUP! Officer Jardis should be the police chief. The current Chief is obviously a brain dead moron!
freetarian 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The person who least identifies with the goals of the force should be its chief?
p00lman 2 years ago
i tottaly agree, the police chief is an idiot and the police officer defending himself should be the police chief and run that shit. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORk
itzzcj 2 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i got browsing to do... wtf is this about? plz put a summary.
DoctorBimbles 2 years ago
Wow, seems the police officer in this video should be the police chief, the chief himself doesn't seem intelligent enough to clean toilets. Get that group out of there. Make this police officer chief.
VeohBlows 2 years ago 15
while i understand your sentiment, why you gotta bring environmental techs down? i clean toilets [among other things] for a living and it does not mean i'm in any way uneducated or destitute.
intrepgun 2 years ago
I mainly meant the Chief and his boy in this video are clearly idiots. I had to fix cars for substandard wages for years, I understand, the positions we take in life are not deserved, backwards upside down country. This chief and his blind minions need removed form their positions.
VeohBlows 2 years ago
I was thinking the other day that this chief ought to be the one fired.
If poor judgment is such a serious offense, such that the chief is using it to demonstrate just how vital it is that Jardis' employment be terminated now, why did the chief allow Jardis' poor judgment to continue all these years without doing anything about it? Poor judgment on the chief's part?
Given that the chief has exercised poor judgment for the same length of time as Jardis, the chief ought to be fired, as well.
ed2276 2 years ago
I bet 40oz of fine silver that the police chief belongs to the local freemason lodge.
MoneyIsSilver 2 years ago 2
he has the right to join any group he likes, just as officer jardis does. the question is, does it mean anything if he were a member of the free masons? no. it doesn't. and it seems a huge waste of time to try and conjure up ideas to make it meaningful. what matters are actions and policies in this instance. you're clouding the issue and that is a detriment to this cause.
intrepgun 2 years ago
Its a common trick to say someone is a detriment to the cause. The truth is never a detriment. You are a suspicious character.
Yes, it does matter if he is a freemason. The masons are a government entity in that their members, who are in every level of government, swear an oath to their lodges above their oath to the constitution.
MoneyIsSilver 2 years ago 2
you really said that just like a mason would. Yeah, they pay for giant stone temples with money they collect in a hat right?
MoneyIsSilver 2 years ago
hang in there man!!
porterzcustomz 2 years ago 3