That is one damn sweet computer. No wonder it costs a ton nowadays, I'd pay good money for that. There's just something about these japanese gaming computers of late 80's, how they played almost perfect ports of arcade games, with fast and fluid controls. Konami MSX, NEC PC-Engine/Turbografx-16 (that was closer to a console though, but still, kicked NES's ass while still being an 8-bit machine at least partially).
I love looking at all these classic machines. The design for this is beautiful. I must say, I would use that case even today. Sure im an Amiga lover, however there is no denying that Sharp did something special with this. Had it been released else where, at its time, this would have been the winner!
(damnit, i need to stop hitting send by accident. damn mobile browsers...)
Anyway, While the Amiga was my favorite of the gaming-oriented computers sold in the US/UK at the time, i'm still surprised that Sharp never released the x68000 in the US. The quality of it's arcade ports would have given it a good edge over the competition...
I am currently thinking of getting into classic computer, would a Sharp X68000 be a good option with someone on a budget or a Amiga. Does the sharp X6800 work on TV's or monitors only. How hard are they to find and the games.
Back in those days, I had Sharp X68000 XVI Compact ... (3.5" Floppy edition). Auto-eject floppy drive ! I installed 6MB RAM, and MC68881 co-processor, and YES, the best 16 bit Personal Workstation I ever had :), that time . :) Eventhough it had 16MHz MC68000 CPU, but it has graphic accelerator, similar to the modern GPU these days.
X68k is very close to Arcade hardware but construction concept is the same like Atari/Amiga (custom chips idea).
Atari never win in battle with Amiga.
We must remember one thing... All this computers are big tresure now, we must preserve everything. This is history, this history still give us a lot of fun! Much more than new overclocked PC crap!
Is it possible to copy this floppies? or do they have some kind of copy protection? I would be scared to loose my games as Floppy disks are not very reliable... I would like to get one of this machines but that would be really something important to decide if I buy it or not.
@EricTucson The Sharp x68000 was a great gaming computer thanks to Konami making games for it and was a big upgrade in video and MIDI sound over the MSX and MSX2 with games like Akumajo Dracula (a reimagining of the 1st Castlevania) that was ported to Playstation and PS3 PSN as Castlevania Chronicles. Did your x68000 come with a controller? I hear it uses two buttons like MSX and MSX2 did, I never found a joystick for it or seen what one looks like and you don't show one in this video.
@loomp I don't think a controller was ever bundled with any of the PCs. I've had fully boxed versions and didn't see a controller included. You can use a variety of controllers like ones from the FM Towns, Sega, or the X-1.
@EricTucson Yes I kind of figured Sharp x68000 used the Atari 2600 universal controller connector used by companies like Sega with the Master System, Sega Genesis/Mega Drive and ColecoVision also a few computers like the Commodore 64 had this input too. When the NES came out companies started making there own connectors what I want to know is how many controller buttons the x68000 uses and I think you had to buy a x68000 controller separately since it did not come in your x68000 box.
Ahh!!! They were good times... Good games and good machines (exept awful block scrolling with MSX I and II). Good memories... Thank You for this clip x)
X68000 was the absolute BEST 16-bit home computer for gaming. Better than IBM PCs, better than Mac, better than Atari ST, better than Amiga. The X68000 was host to many arcade ports that were either identical to the original arcade or very close.
It might have had better "ports" due to unlimited access to original artwork/binary files and identical Arcade hardware, but that is the ONLY advantage I see it having. What about it's
OS?Can it Multitask?CAn it emulate PC/MAC/ATari and 20 other machines?The machine had potential but was just a shrunk down Acrcade machine, while the Amiga was 'created' from the ground up HW & SW....Atari was an Amiga wanna-be, Macs had no color/sound,PCs...ha......
I don't have much to say about the difference in operating systems, but for games, these machines were vastly superior to any of the contemporary Amiga models. The hardware is just light years ahead, and as for the actual games, they were usually more polished than Amiga games.
the hardware was very simular about 2MHz apart in the speed department im convinced the high end amiga could handle outrun perfectly rather then the current clone made in amos basic heh and thats another thing that seperates them the amiga was based on wimp development although not as piss easy as windows so would need to know computers and not think you know about them before getting one heh but yeah way ahead of its time
The world at the time was saturated with machines such as the Atari ST, Apple Macintosh, Commodore Amiga and the Acorn Archimedes. Sharp would not have been competitive enough, especially when it came to pricing the product in order to gain substantial market share. The existing manufacturers were already very well established and provided the public with machines that were very affordable.
It was a general purpose computer as well, for word processing and computer graphics. Western computers didn't deal with Japanese well, or at all, but native Japanese systems like the PC-98, FM Towns, and the X68000 series did.
That is one damn sweet computer. No wonder it costs a ton nowadays, I'd pay good money for that. There's just something about these japanese gaming computers of late 80's, how they played almost perfect ports of arcade games, with fast and fluid controls. Konami MSX, NEC PC-Engine/Turbografx-16 (that was closer to a console though, but still, kicked NES's ass while still being an 8-bit machine at least partially).
Samoutuomas 1 week ago
How clever of Konami, put a background music while the game is being loaded from the floppy disk :)
mruppel2 3 weeks ago
Wiah i had this in the late 80s and not my IBM ps/2 model 30...
nym56789 2 months ago
oh, wow! I've never even seen a pic of the 68K, but wow, it's beautiful!
figaro589 3 months ago
This machine was ahead of it's time.
xan1242 4 months ago
I love looking at all these classic machines. The design for this is beautiful. I must say, I would use that case even today. Sure im an Amiga lover, however there is no denying that Sharp did something special with this. Had it been released else where, at its time, this would have been the winner!
nutellajunkie 4 months ago
(damnit, i need to stop hitting send by accident. damn mobile browsers...)
Anyway, While the Amiga was my favorite of the gaming-oriented computers sold in the US/UK at the time, i'm still surprised that Sharp never released the x68000 in the US. The quality of it's arcade ports would have given it a good edge over the competition...
poopskinTheLiar 5 months ago
Comment removed
poopskinTheLiar 5 months ago
NERDS!
hayato1ful 6 months ago
I am currently thinking of getting into classic computer, would a Sharp X68000 be a good option with someone on a budget or a Amiga. Does the sharp X6800 work on TV's or monitors only. How hard are they to find and the games.
ATARI800XLfan 8 months ago
@ATARI800XLfan Amiga all the way. Sharps need monitors and a good knowledge of Japanese. Not for the faint hearted at all.
doritostheking 8 months ago
It's pretty awesome that these came with the YM2151 sound chip in them - light years ahead of the adlib garbage most american pcs came with.
illDiology 1 year ago
the boot music is just awesome... and... seriously, this machine was really powerful!
somahiru 1 year ago
Back in those days, I had Sharp X68000 XVI Compact ... (3.5" Floppy edition). Auto-eject floppy drive ! I installed 6MB RAM, and MC68881 co-processor, and YES, the best 16 bit Personal Workstation I ever had :), that time . :) Eventhough it had 16MHz MC68000 CPU, but it has graphic accelerator, similar to the modern GPU these days.
Gradius 2 is my favorite shooting game ever ! :)
bahathir 1 year ago
was a amazing pc played so many arcade titles
basshuter2007 1 year ago
if only we could go back to those days when games were made for real gamers.
RickRudesMustache 1 year ago
Looks very modern
rapper1918 1 year ago
I still got mine but it is white i have salamander street fighter 2 and mr do pack
nibelung34343 1 year ago
oh man, that music kicks the crap out of that soundblaster shit I was rocking around that time.
shorty1k 1 year ago
X68k is very close to Arcade hardware but construction concept is the same like Atari/Amiga (custom chips idea).
Atari never win in battle with Amiga.
We must remember one thing... All this computers are big tresure now, we must preserve everything. This is history, this history still give us a lot of fun! Much more than new overclocked PC crap!
mariodivine 2 years ago
awesome,all games works in XVI sharp x68000?i think old old games dont work"gemini wing,granada x etc etc???"
gillianx68000 2 years ago
That computer looks a lot like modern ones.... Is it really from the 80's?
hylianarmy0 2 years ago
Yeah this was back when Japan was kicking our asses at everything
michiyoyoshiku 2 years ago
Is it possible to copy this floppies? or do they have some kind of copy protection? I would be scared to loose my games as Floppy disks are not very reliable... I would like to get one of this machines but that would be really something important to decide if I buy it or not.
Ryoga2K 2 years ago
Yep, you can copy them. How do you think gamers my age got our collection 20 years ago? ;)
EricTucson 2 years ago
@EricTucson The Sharp x68000 was a great gaming computer thanks to Konami making games for it and was a big upgrade in video and MIDI sound over the MSX and MSX2 with games like Akumajo Dracula (a reimagining of the 1st Castlevania) that was ported to Playstation and PS3 PSN as Castlevania Chronicles. Did your x68000 come with a controller? I hear it uses two buttons like MSX and MSX2 did, I never found a joystick for it or seen what one looks like and you don't show one in this video.
loomp 1 year ago
@loomp I don't think a controller was ever bundled with any of the PCs. I've had fully boxed versions and didn't see a controller included. You can use a variety of controllers like ones from the FM Towns, Sega, or the X-1.
EricTucson 1 year ago
@EricTucson Yes I kind of figured Sharp x68000 used the Atari 2600 universal controller connector used by companies like Sega with the Master System, Sega Genesis/Mega Drive and ColecoVision also a few computers like the Commodore 64 had this input too. When the NES came out companies started making there own connectors what I want to know is how many controller buttons the x68000 uses and I think you had to buy a x68000 controller separately since it did not come in your x68000 box.
loomp 1 year ago
@Ryoga2K DON'T COPY THAT FLOPPY! :P
atherrien95 9 months ago
@atherrien95 Damn you now I'm going to have to hear bad rap for 10 minutes xD
Ryoga2K 9 months ago
Comment removed
gillianx68000 2 years ago
Ahh!!! They were good times... Good games and good machines (exept awful block scrolling with MSX I and II). Good memories... Thank You for this clip x)
Full4mat 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow this sucks hardcore
kewlkill20 3 years ago
Very nice lookin for 87... slim design
kinmanyuen 3 years ago 6
I notice that the music started playing long before the game had actually completely loaded. What an amazing machine for its time.
Lachlant1984 3 years ago
Is that perhaps loading music?
WatMcWatley 3 years ago
X68000 was the absolute BEST 16-bit home computer for gaming. Better than IBM PCs, better than Mac, better than Atari ST, better than Amiga. The X68000 was host to many arcade ports that were either identical to the original arcade or very close.
airraideagle 3 years ago 13
What an awesome machine, if only it was marketed outside of Japan.
Commodorian 3 years ago 2
Thats because Capcom developed their games on these systems in the first place so it was easy to make home versions.
ojideagu 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How can this thing beat Amiga OS???
It might have had better "ports" due to unlimited access to original artwork/binary files and identical Arcade hardware, but that is the ONLY advantage I see it having. What about it's
OS?Can it Multitask?CAn it emulate PC/MAC/ATari and 20 other machines?The machine had potential but was just a shrunk down Acrcade machine, while the Amiga was 'created' from the ground up HW & SW....Atari was an Amiga wanna-be, Macs had no color/sound,PCs...ha......
surfitlive 2 years ago
I don't have much to say about the difference in operating systems, but for games, these machines were vastly superior to any of the contemporary Amiga models. The hardware is just light years ahead, and as for the actual games, they were usually more polished than Amiga games.
storerestore 2 years ago
the hardware was very simular about 2MHz apart in the speed department im convinced the high end amiga could handle outrun perfectly rather then the current clone made in amos basic heh and thats another thing that seperates them the amiga was based on wimp development although not as piss easy as windows so would need to know computers and not think you know about them before getting one heh but yeah way ahead of its time
xslowcorex 2 years ago
i think the games was better polished due to the developers being competent in the machines and being older then 7
xslowcorex 2 years ago
The BEST home computer! is a shadow for all retro computer systems. THE BEST!!
Jeknoid 3 years ago
Wow, that really looks like a neat home computer.
What a shame they were never released here.
Imagine how different the home computer business might have been if this was available next to the PC and the Amiga in the 80's/90's.
If it also had Metal Gear 1(MSX) and Metal Gear 2 Solid Snake I would have wanted one of these.
TheDutchGhost 3 years ago
The world at the time was saturated with machines such as the Atari ST, Apple Macintosh, Commodore Amiga and the Acorn Archimedes. Sharp would not have been competitive enough, especially when it came to pricing the product in order to gain substantial market share. The existing manufacturers were already very well established and provided the public with machines that were very affordable.
Commodorian 3 years ago
Yeah but a guy can still dream.
Its only years later that I have been able to play decent Arcade ports or roms after years of poor conversions.
TheDutchGhost 3 years ago
Some conversions were good but most were crap. I remember how dissapointed I was when I saw the Amiga version of Street Fighter II.
Commodorian 3 years ago
my japanese friend had one damn thing is so beast!
BiggMykexero 3 years ago
What else can that machine do besides play video games???
I'm just curious since I learned a little bit about it by playing the Akumajo Dracula remake on the Playstation AKA Castlevania Chronicles????
Xclibur2001 3 years ago
It was a general purpose computer as well, for word processing and computer graphics. Western computers didn't deal with Japanese well, or at all, but native Japanese systems like the PC-98, FM Towns, and the X68000 series did.
guyvf 3 years ago
Man, I wanna one!
juazha 3 years ago
What a beautiful machine.
It's looks like the arcade version !!!
Keep it in good condition ;-).
Sharp have made a really good job.
DannySNTV 3 years ago 3
yeah but loading arcade-quality games into memory off of a 5.25 floppy is nothing short of a miracle.
bigshrimpn 4 years ago 3
man that's sum long boot time there. i won't think harshly at all about my NeoGeo CD anymore :-P
aj0049 4 years ago