@brndnlnd I know, right? I love coming to songs like this and reading the arguments/discussions people have over history, where they're actually passionate and informed about it, instead of just reciting names they don't understand out of a textbook. I learn so much! :)
@tjfats2 I actually don't know who would win that... Trolls are huge and incredibly strong, goblins are sneaky and warlike, and leprechauns can escape from anything...
@DestroyerOfSense000 I think it'd be a draw between the goblins and the leprechauns. Goblins kill trollls but leprechauns would escape to their trippy fuckin rainbows
sinners! crist is the only way, this is very good musica, i'd never say it's noise, but the pagan/black lyrics and the voices grinds my ears, this is shit!!
@spartancripto I prefer paganism over Christianity. Christians preach that only good Christians get to be happy in the afterlife, whereas all good people regardless of creed recieve a place in the Summerland.
not attacking you, just stating the reasons for my preference
@spartancripto The vocals are an intense and beautiful sound in the context, intensifying the emotion. Pagans were just trying to live their lives. Christianity is fine by itself but why is it a kind man who doesn't accept Christ as his savior is doomed to hell but some guy who worships Jesus can be kind of a douche and go to heaven? It doesn't make sense to me. Gauls gave both sexes equal rights and were enlightened way before Rome had become Christian and still used women as political property
@evolooshion You must realize that tribal societies could not become "enlightened." Either they were already awake or they weren't. To enlighten a tribal society means to change it, and most noblemen in Gaul resisted it before Rome became a major influence. And Celts, Insular or Continental, used women as political property all the time. The point I'm trying to put across is that The War with Gaul was really a power struggle, neither a fight for freedom nor a fight for civilization.
@DestroyerOfSense000 The Romans didn't have enlightenment. "Enlightenment" didn't come to the Western world until centuries later. I've studied the Celtic peoples and have several sources that said they didn't use woman as badly, but I'm always open to your sources that say otherwise :). Despite normal belief, the Gauls were also quite technologically advanced as pretty new research has uncovered, so it is possible for them to "evolve" in ways a typical tribal society could not.
@evolooshion There was a very huge rift between the Gauls adjacent to the Roman Province and the Gauls closest to Britain. For example, the Aedui, a powerful confederacy, as well as the Helvetii, to which "Eluveitie" refers to, had some form of elections by Caesar's time. They were renowned almost universally as metalworkers, but you're right, the southern half of Gaul at least was had some form of "civilization." They were not like the Germans were then, who had almost no contact with Rome.
@DestroyerOfSense000 And I don't think even peoples such as the Germans had a lesser culture than the Romans or southern Gauls. It didn't have the same technological prowess that the latter might have had, but there were less tangible, more philosophical aspects that made it quite interesting and respectable
@evolooshion Trust me, I am not one to look down upon Germanic civilization. It was the greatest warrior culture to ever live. I put "civilization" in quotes for a reason, for the Germans' civilization was not inferior. It was different. Tacitus's Germania actually favors Germanic civilization over the current state of affairs in Rome.
@evolooshion On this point however I agree. A good exemple of powerful women in celtic world is the Queen Boudicca who led revolts against the Romans.
@DestroyerOfSense000 No. I When I said "Feel free to respond. I'm interested in what you would have to say. But if you don't want to, no biggie :)", I was referring to the other two comments I had made in response to your argument. I guess you didn't see those, which is understandable as Youtube has a pointless tendency to only alert people of last the reply someone made to you, even if they made several. So no, it's not a mindgame, just a misunderstanding :)
You must also remember, all of you who believe that Gauls were noble savages, that Gauls fought each other all the time and they were far from their "honorable" ideals of warfare. If raids and ambushes are honorable, then what is dishonorable? Even some of the wealthier Gauls, such as Diviciacus, openly helped Caesar, even against their own kin. Diviciacus ratted out his own brother, Dumnorix, to appease Caesar.
@DestroyerOfSense000 Raids and ambushes aren't dishonorable. It doesn't have to be pitched battles. Not only did men and women have equal rights like I said below, but they had welfare for the handicapped, lust-children and sick when Romans were leaving unwanted babies in the dumpster. And even if the Celts did engage in wartime atrocities, they weren't as horrible as Romans whose type of slavery was also unmatched in size and cruelty. A raid is okay, enslaving an entire populous is not.
@evolooshion There is no definition of honor that is universal, and there probably never will be. I am speaking of the ideals of the Celts themselves. They were known to seek glory above all else, and if they found it in raids, they'd take it as it came. Single combat, pitched battles, they were all obviously more glorious to a warrior culture such as the Gauls. And if they did have equal rights, it is not apparent. Celts were known to have multiple wives. If you can prove that wrong, do so.
Well, Gauls as everybody liked gold and since ceaser payed very well they helped him, and since they were divided it was more easy, ambush isn't deshonorable, it helps alot, since most of gallia was a huge forest and most of the gauls were hunters they used that trick. Gaul didn't use women in a politic, actually Gauls thought that the women were just good to make babies, if a father had to much daughter she gave them as sacrifice to the gods.
@NasriTheNewKing Yes, both Celts and Germans of the time were forest-dwellers. They prized hunting more than any other civilizations of their time. And yes, ambushes and raids were the natural style of warfare by a hunting society. But even to them, war was more glorious than hunting. In war you may fight in single combat, at least in their society. You cannot duel a deer, obviously. War was much more personal to them than the "civilized" societies, who only sought overall victory.
Well not really most o time Gaul fought Romans and Germans , Gauls made many raid in roman lands but had to defend themself against Germanic tirbs , the last time that Gauls officialy declared war was aginst Greece in 290 BC , Gauls weren't as aggressive as you think , german were , of course they made war against each other to fix problem but it was tthe case of every nation during the last 2000 years .
@NasriTheNewKing According to Tacitus the Gauls were known to be more powerful than the Germans before 300 BC. After that the Germans were universally renowned as the better fighters. Yes, you are correct. The Gauls invaded Greece around that time and successfully settled Galatia, but Greece was victorious. That loss of manpower and the increase of contact with 'civilized' states made Gauls more "hedonistic" than before.
Greece were victorious , well except the defeat from the macedonians , the gaul left Greece by themself , and Gaul were still more powerull then Germans even after 300 BC the belgea always pushed back the germans and even invaded them many times , only the Helvetii had lost to Germans .
Well they thought it was more powerfull because gauls weren't divided as in 52 BC , they used to have kings during that time , such as Brennos , even Alexander the great discribed them as the bravest warriors he had met , he even asked to them to be his bodyguards .
@evolooshion I guess that since 1 month you have been responded. But since it's in the highest rated comments I wanted to clarify one thing: When Rome conquered Gaul, Rome was pagan. They didn't have the same paganic religion, but they were pagan, and they used women as political property LONG before the empire accepted christianity.
@DestroyerOfSense000 I might sound like I'm being aggressive in my response. I'm just mentioning now that any negativity is not intended. As you said that we haven't reached that yet, it's because Western society is actually one of the less enlightened societies of the ancient world. In fact, it may be the bottom of the barrel. Of course, it's the one whose influence was everlasting so people might seem otherwise. The enlightenment revolution was simply putting another layer on corruption
@DestroyerOfSense000 (comment number 2) The Celts were rather enlightened from everything I've read. Their political system had a ton of it. I could list it but it would take a lot of characters. Also, I attempted putting a response about women not being used as political property, but all four times I tried to post it Youtube wouldn't let it pass. So I gave up. I'll try again :). Most of the women with evident power seemed to be in areas farther away from Rome and less "civilized"
@DestroyerOfSense000 (Comment number 3). Boudica was a queen/leader in the British isles. It is true that polygamy was a reality. However, women were quite promiscuous as well. One Celtic woman was quoted "We fulfill the necessity of nature much better than Roman women do, for we have intercourse openly with the best, whereas you are abused secretly by the least," The flaxen haired maidens of the north are trained in sports and war while our gentle ladies are content to do their womanly duties"
To wrap up the idea of ancient societies Nonwstrn being rather enlightened, I would like to point out the Alans, a nomadic people whose love of freedom caused them to have a society without slavery; something that many would say, "we're not even that enlightened," about simply a couple hundred years ago (in contrast to millenniums ago with the Alans)
Sorry I responded so much. I figured it's best to make your case completely
@evolooshion Well, by your definition of enlightenment I'll have to agree with you. The Celts, Germans, Scythians and Alans had great personal freedom and a very happy population, with much leisure time. I would love that kind of lifestyle myself. But they were hellbent on war and conquest. I am in no way a pacifist, in fact I'm quite the opposite, but the tribal wars fought were not rebellions or wars of defense against an evil empire. *continued in next section*
@DestroyerOfSense000 But there were many tribal peoples that were very restricted and despotic. The Dacians (Getae), Huns, and Mongols were ruled by warlords who could kill any disobedient subject almost at will, and the Dacians in particular were ruled by the priests and a body of feudal lords, so they were not enlightened in my opinion.
@DestroyerOfSense000 First off I have to say, I can't believe the best discussion I've had about history in years is on the internet (most of my friends aren't as interested) :P. Yeah, the constant war is could be kind of brutal, but I do think that in some of societies, the majority of inhabitants were at least competent with their weapons, so there was less "civilian" casualties, although you can't say the same about all societies, often with women *Continued on next comment*
@evolooshion (although sometimes women held high status as has been said), and tribal peoples still raided areas of defenseless populations--there's sadly no way around it. As for slavery, although it was practiced by most cultures, it was sometimes less accepted (I read somewhere that non-southern Gauls frowned upon slavery, although further research would need to confirm this). By contrast, slavery was sometimes a norm. So although the severely brutal treatment in war did happen, *continued*
@evolooshion The nature and severity of the ferocity wasn't necessarily a worst case scenario :).
And as for the corruption, your statement made me reconsider how much of their morality (towards their fellow tribesmen/women) was enlightenment or just simple morality, as "enlightened" people might not be so easily influenced/corrupted
@evolooshion Most of my friends don't even know what I'm talking about when I talk about history so I'm glad too. I must admit I've read most of my information of Gaul and Germania from Caesar and Tacitus, who for obvious reasons were extremely biased. Most of the unbiased historical information I receive is synthesized in my own mind. I read various snippets and try to imagine how that society or person, etc. would feel. These various deductions have led me to believe... *continued*
@evolooshion That we are just beyond the zenith of an age where material possessions and outward success are the ways people judge others. Tribal societies, before they learned to write, were very much moral and just, but they could only maintain justice by their laws, and when more "civilized" societies introduced their laws and advanced technology the tribesmen saw advantage in them and adopted them, not knowing that these advances came with the end of their freedom. *continued*
@evolooshion Now we are in a "civilized" age where we are extremely intelligent but not very wise. Our scientific advances are beautiful but are prone to being used wrongly. The zenith, to the best of my knowledge, ended in the 1960's with the counterculture movements popular at the time. Of course, those movements lost most of their momentum within little more than a decade, but the spirit of freedom, made stronger by the Internet, will eventually enlighten us. :)
@evolooshion They were meant to preserve honor or win glory or simply for plunder and loot. Pirates did the same thing, and they were personally free to a great extent, but we consider them to be mere brigands and often desperate men. I am not saying that all the native European tribes did was fight wars, but they fought almost constantly in one form or another. It was not seen as a curse, rather a blessing. I cannot pass judgement on that, *continued in next reply*
@evolooshion but I can say that these wars often involved enslavement or outright massacre of certain groups of people, if not the whole tribe. But if you consider the happiness and general camaraderie in those tribes and nations, which I consider to be the greatest measure of goodness, they were better off than any other civilizations, before or after. In that sense of enlightenment they were far above most other civilizations. *continued in next reply*
@evolooshion But those societies were easily corrupted. The Romans and the colonial British were masters of manipulative and corruptive techniques. The southern Gauls had already adopted much of Roman civilization before Caesar conquered them, and they then became more effeminate and weak in the eyes of their neighbors. The Germans and Britons, along with the peoples of the steppe, were not corrupted until much later. *continued in next reply*
@GrenMoyo I wouldn't be surprised if that was true. At least in certain Celtic areas. After all the Celts were a collection of different societies. For instance the people of the British isles and Northern Gaul had more rights for women than Southern Gaul (which was more influenced by their Western neighbors). Does Aristotle specify which Celtic people he's talking about?
@evolooshion no he wasn't specific he only used the term "belligerent nations" in Reference to the people in the area which wasn't limited to Gaul or Gaelic tribes, I believe he also referenced the peoples in Magna Germania.
@GrenMoyo As I've heard Magna Germania was inhabited by priestesses, that seems likely (though I must admit, my Germanic knowledge isn't my best arena). As for the Celts, I heard is that women often got away with more than they did in Roman Greek realms (hooray!)
@evolooshion romans werent christians when they conquered gauls, besides, just because sexes were treated more equal (but not completely equal at all) it doesnt mean that gaulish society was more "enlightened", greeks were chauvinistic as hell but tolerated homosexuals as well to give an example that is very hard to compare ancient people. Also, behind all that mystic and romantic imagery, druids were oligarchs who played with power.
@franvi77 1: I'm aware that Romans weren't Christians when they conquered Rome. They were still chauvinistic when they were Christians. Separate incidents, friend.
2: Secondly, several ancient cultures were cool with homosexuality. It's not until later they were scorned...
3: Maybe they weren't completely equal, but don't downplay the significat equality achieved. Women were warriors, rulers, ambassadors, and could divorce for just about any reason.
4: Romans threw their unwanted babies in a dumpster. Celts had a social welfare for children. I'm not going to say the Celtic countries had achieved full enlightenment but there's a gap between the two (Celts and Romans), all things considered.at least in my opinion.
Disclaimer, I do not claim to know everything. Everything I have said is the result of what my research has made me believe--I am open to other information, as long as it is delivered respectfully :)
@evolooshion Celts made human sacrifices and beheading was considered a sport...
What Im trying to say is that you are not judging the customs of people from the XXI century, you cant blame romans for chauvinism or celts for "savages" (very wrong term to me) from the perspective of modern society, it is unfair.
@franvi77 It is true what you say, I think after being on the top comments list my original comment was thrust out of context. The Celts had practices modern society would be appalled by, no doubt. But I was replying to a religious Christian who was scorning Eluveitie for their "pagan" and thus "evil" lyrics. I was just trying to say that it wasn't such a simple matter. I see how it may seem like I was glorifying the Gauls and demonizing the Romans, but I know it's not that simple \m/
@evolooshion You know gauls didn't give rights to women , in fact when they had to much daughters , they often gave the last one in sacrifice to the gods to have more sons , that's why they could build an anrmy of 300 000 - 400 000 warrors easily , Ceaser even captured hundred thousands gauls , most of them were sold has slave or sent in the arena as gladiators , around 300 000 gauls died during the Gallic war , and they were still enough to invade britain later .
The gaulish population was around 3-4 millions , knowin that at the age of 12 - 13 years your were considered as adult , they could build an army of 800 000 men , imagine that unleashed against Rome lol . To bad Vercingetorix took the power to late . And you're right Romans were the real barbarians , actually they stole countless idea from the Celts , during centuries they used gaulish weapons before the famous gladius .
@NasriTheNewKing Part 1: I've never heard that first bit about the Gauls before. That's surprising to me. I must admit Celtic cultures aren't my main arena, though I read from a lot of sources that the Celts gave women several rights (ambassadors, rulers and even warriors), and also a piece about the relatively recent uncovering of a massive tomb of a seemingly wealthy Gaulish woman. That being said most of the support I later found for gender equality
@evolooshion was from the peoples of the British isles (Boudica, for instance), who needless to say were culturally different. I'd be interested to see your sources on the matter if you would be so kind as to give me a reference, fellow history fan :)
I have a link about their sacrifices , it is in french , if you find a good translator , type sacrifice gaulois in google and normally it is the first link , but i also have a book who talk about France and his past , it starts around 600 BC to napoleon , they are something like 3-4 pages about the gauls .
Do you also know that some celtic tribs used to eat the hearts of their enemies , i think it was in scotland , i've saw it in a documentary at the Tv long time ago , celt were also special , maybe some tribs gave more rights to women , but for the gauls i'm sure they didn't , maybe later under roman rules or in Asterix lol
@NasriTheNewKing Thanks for the link man! Personally I don't have anything against cultural cannibalism as fucked up as that may sound rofl. I doubt gaulish women had too much under the Roman rule though...their women weren't too fortunate either :(. And Aterix is fucking boss
Well just a small part of celtic tribs practiced cannibalism , human sacrifice was more popular if i can say it lol , gauls even had different way to honor a god , some of them were put in a wooden box and then burnt , other were decapitated ( this one was for Toutatis ) and other were dismembered ( this was for the god of darkness ) , but around the 100 BC they started to make sacrifice with criminals . Posidonius wrote somethigna about that .
@NasriTheNewKing That would make more sense to use criminals. After all sacrificing respected tribal members would result in...grudges to say the least. At least that's what I'd imagine
@spartancripto Haha fuck all those people "not attacking" you; you should learn your place. For starters, you cannot even spell the name of your own god correctly. For another thing, to lump pagan and black metal lyrics into the same category is frankly offensive. I'm a pagan and I don't worship your Satan; learn the difference. And you can claim that something that is pagan is wrong when you stop celebrating all your major holidays, which were all stolen from the pagan peoples you "converted."
@jadedhero1331 Most Christians who post on here haven't even read the Bible. If they did they'd see that it was a holy book, not a warrior's speech. And many old Christian stories are based off pagan mythology, the tales about Satan included. Of course, many Christians think that God is all-powerful and yet he can't prevent Satan from doing what he does. There is no religion to me, it is all what we believe. I personally think two people believing the exact same thing is folly, but we are free.
@DestroyerOfSense000 I completely agree with you, but I'm pretty sure most Christians in general haven't read the Bible. I tried to be Christian for awhile, but I got tired of trying to be something that I was not. Every time a Christian tries to tell me something, I counter by explaining things that were explicitly stated in the Bible, because I actually read it while they did not. I love Christmas time, because I enjoy laughing when people complain about it "not being about Jesus anymore."
@DestroyerOfSense000 A friend of mine tried to explain the not-stopping-Satan part to me once as God has the power to stop Satan but he chooses not to. I feel like that's hardly a better thing to believe...why would you want to believe in a god who actively chooses to allow evil to be visited upon his believers? I always thought the Satan story was kind of funny; it more or less states that if you disobey God in a big enough way, you get your own kingdom. It seems fairly counterproductive...
@jadedhero1331 I personally think that the whole story was a half-hearted attempt to reconcile Christian beliefs with pagan beliefs, especially in Greece. The apostles traveled so much in Greece and Greek Asia Minor that they probably found a story like that extremely useful. It might be genuine Christian mythology, I honestly don't know. But, in either case, before some zealot goes around talking about it they should consider its historical background.
This is real music.... most US music suxs, this is real men music. Amon Amarth, Korpiklanni, Sabaton, Turisas, Hammerfall, Rammstien, Etc Hail from the US of A
@antkowiak666 O yes! American Metal and Rock in the 80s i love, Metallica, Rush, Pantera, ManOwar, Fear Factory, Slayer, etc... just some bands i like but i have way more favorites from Europe
I had a bad case of testicular torsion because the veins in my balls were head banging so badly that they cut off the blood flow to my balls, but the 5 minutes 11 seconds of this song allowed me to come to terms with the fact that my balls were probably going to get chopped off so I took a Blacktooth Grin that Dimebag recommended and kept the spirit going.
P.S. I still have my balls but I'd sacrifice them for the pleasure of everyone's ears.
this song needs more credit + views, comon a half boy half girl sing baby all over again and gets 500 milion vieuws and a awesome song like this only 641 thousand?? something isnt write/
I am a celtic druid, my big plan is creating a world full of green beer and celtic warriors! If you agree, give me your hands! We need blood for sacrifice!!!
@bitcheslikemahtankin Sometimes, Peace can only be achieve through war (Nas once made a wonderful song called 'War is necessary'). But personnaly, I only believe in war as a final solution, so in a way you are right. Peace! from a Belgian apprentice-Druid.
music only? lol
xKnutte95x 1 day ago in playlist YouTube Mix for Eluveitie
Nowadays there aren't halfmoons, are they?
No, there are only twelve stars.
THEIR BEST SONG
akatanomasty 2 weeks ago
Wow... sounds just like Dark Tranquillity.... with flutes.... LMAO!!!
CLWarunki 3 weeks ago
what tuning do they use for the mandolin?
metalhealth1980 1 month ago
@metalhealth1980 it's a mandola, no?
RenaAngel 1 month ago
Przejmujemy ?!
romananarhia 1 month ago
Listen to this band and play Skyrim.... EPIC!
Manaheeissweet 1 month ago 9
@Manaheeissweet i wanted to try this, but i tooked an arrow in the knee.
bulangicul 17 hours ago
This is I want to live for !!
Awesome song from awesome band.
bachforelle11 3 months ago
i learn more history reading the comments of eluveitie songs than i do in my history class at school!
brndnlnd 3 months ago
@brndnlnd I know, right? I love coming to songs like this and reading the arguments/discussions people have over history, where they're actually passionate and informed about it, instead of just reciting names they don't understand out of a textbook. I learn so much! :)
MorganBonny 3 months ago
who says norway has all the good metal?
DueIistGio 4 months ago
Love this song
Celtic metal = new genre?
I can picture trolls, goblins, and leprechauns fighting an epic battle
lol
tjfats2 4 months ago 14
@tjfats2 You should check out "Finntroll" then. :-D
KongoXIIV 3 months ago
@KongoXIIV Way ahead of you there lol
tjfats2 3 months ago
@tjfats2 This is called folk metal along with other bands like tyr and ensiferum.
DeathMetal6907 2 months ago
@tjfats2 I actually don't know who would win that... Trolls are huge and incredibly strong, goblins are sneaky and warlike, and leprechauns can escape from anything...
DestroyerOfSense000 6 days ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 I think it'd be a draw between the goblins and the leprechauns. Goblins kill trollls but leprechauns would escape to their trippy fuckin rainbows
evolooshion 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sinners! crist is the only way, this is very good musica, i'd never say it's noise, but the pagan/black lyrics and the voices grinds my ears, this is shit!!
spartancripto 5 months ago
@spartancripto religion = WAR. i do not attac you. i am only telling the truth about .
MsMultiMiauuu 5 months ago 3
@spartancripto I prefer paganism over Christianity. Christians preach that only good Christians get to be happy in the afterlife, whereas all good people regardless of creed recieve a place in the Summerland.
not attacking you, just stating the reasons for my preference
emilieautumnFAN13 5 months ago 2
@spartancripto This is not Pegan lyrics , it's about Caesar conquering Galia :D :D
panjista 5 months ago
@panjista Yes it is. For the Gauls, exemplified by Dumnorix, had very strong feelings about it XD
DestroyerOfSense000 5 months ago
@spartancripto The vocals are an intense and beautiful sound in the context, intensifying the emotion. Pagans were just trying to live their lives. Christianity is fine by itself but why is it a kind man who doesn't accept Christ as his savior is doomed to hell but some guy who worships Jesus can be kind of a douche and go to heaven? It doesn't make sense to me. Gauls gave both sexes equal rights and were enlightened way before Rome had become Christian and still used women as political property
evolooshion 4 months ago 18
@evolooshion You must realize that tribal societies could not become "enlightened." Either they were already awake or they weren't. To enlighten a tribal society means to change it, and most noblemen in Gaul resisted it before Rome became a major influence. And Celts, Insular or Continental, used women as political property all the time. The point I'm trying to put across is that The War with Gaul was really a power struggle, neither a fight for freedom nor a fight for civilization.
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 The Romans didn't have enlightenment. "Enlightenment" didn't come to the Western world until centuries later. I've studied the Celtic peoples and have several sources that said they didn't use woman as badly, but I'm always open to your sources that say otherwise :). Despite normal belief, the Gauls were also quite technologically advanced as pretty new research has uncovered, so it is possible for them to "evolve" in ways a typical tribal society could not.
evolooshion 3 months ago
@evolooshion There was a very huge rift between the Gauls adjacent to the Roman Province and the Gauls closest to Britain. For example, the Aedui, a powerful confederacy, as well as the Helvetii, to which "Eluveitie" refers to, had some form of elections by Caesar's time. They were renowned almost universally as metalworkers, but you're right, the southern half of Gaul at least was had some form of "civilization." They were not like the Germans were then, who had almost no contact with Rome.
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 And I don't think even peoples such as the Germans had a lesser culture than the Romans or southern Gauls. It didn't have the same technological prowess that the latter might have had, but there were less tangible, more philosophical aspects that made it quite interesting and respectable
evolooshion 3 months ago
@evolooshion Trust me, I am not one to look down upon Germanic civilization. It was the greatest warrior culture to ever live. I put "civilization" in quotes for a reason, for the Germans' civilization was not inferior. It was different. Tacitus's Germania actually favors Germanic civilization over the current state of affairs in Rome.
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
@evolooshion On this point however I agree. A good exemple of powerful women in celtic world is the Queen Boudicca who led revolts against the Romans.
maaderllin 2 months ago
@maaderllin and Cartimandua of the Brigantes. now THAT was a woman with some force behind her words
emilieautumnFAN13 2 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 Feel free to respond. I'm interested in what you would have to say. But if you don't want to, no biggie :)
evolooshion 3 months ago
@evolooshion I just did respond O.o
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 Whoa. Heavy O.o
evolooshion 3 months ago
@evolooshion Is this some kind of mind game? If so, I will not waste my time with my arguments any more....
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 No. I When I said "Feel free to respond. I'm interested in what you would have to say. But if you don't want to, no biggie :)", I was referring to the other two comments I had made in response to your argument. I guess you didn't see those, which is understandable as Youtube has a pointless tendency to only alert people of last the reply someone made to you, even if they made several. So no, it's not a mindgame, just a misunderstanding :)
evolooshion 3 months ago
@evolooshion Apologies. I will now reply. :)
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
You must also remember, all of you who believe that Gauls were noble savages, that Gauls fought each other all the time and they were far from their "honorable" ideals of warfare. If raids and ambushes are honorable, then what is dishonorable? Even some of the wealthier Gauls, such as Diviciacus, openly helped Caesar, even against their own kin. Diviciacus ratted out his own brother, Dumnorix, to appease Caesar.
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 Raids and ambushes aren't dishonorable. It doesn't have to be pitched battles. Not only did men and women have equal rights like I said below, but they had welfare for the handicapped, lust-children and sick when Romans were leaving unwanted babies in the dumpster. And even if the Celts did engage in wartime atrocities, they weren't as horrible as Romans whose type of slavery was also unmatched in size and cruelty. A raid is okay, enslaving an entire populous is not.
evolooshion 3 months ago
@evolooshion There is no definition of honor that is universal, and there probably never will be. I am speaking of the ideals of the Celts themselves. They were known to seek glory above all else, and if they found it in raids, they'd take it as it came. Single combat, pitched battles, they were all obviously more glorious to a warrior culture such as the Gauls. And if they did have equal rights, it is not apparent. Celts were known to have multiple wives. If you can prove that wrong, do so.
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000
Well, Gauls as everybody liked gold and since ceaser payed very well they helped him, and since they were divided it was more easy, ambush isn't deshonorable, it helps alot, since most of gallia was a huge forest and most of the gauls were hunters they used that trick. Gaul didn't use women in a politic, actually Gauls thought that the women were just good to make babies, if a father had to much daughter she gave them as sacrifice to the gods.
NasriTheNewKing 3 months ago
@NasriTheNewKing Yes, both Celts and Germans of the time were forest-dwellers. They prized hunting more than any other civilizations of their time. And yes, ambushes and raids were the natural style of warfare by a hunting society. But even to them, war was more glorious than hunting. In war you may fight in single combat, at least in their society. You cannot duel a deer, obviously. War was much more personal to them than the "civilized" societies, who only sought overall victory.
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000
Well not really most o time Gaul fought Romans and Germans , Gauls made many raid in roman lands but had to defend themself against Germanic tirbs , the last time that Gauls officialy declared war was aginst Greece in 290 BC , Gauls weren't as aggressive as you think , german were , of course they made war against each other to fix problem but it was tthe case of every nation during the last 2000 years .
NasriTheNewKing 3 months ago
@NasriTheNewKing According to Tacitus the Gauls were known to be more powerful than the Germans before 300 BC. After that the Germans were universally renowned as the better fighters. Yes, you are correct. The Gauls invaded Greece around that time and successfully settled Galatia, but Greece was victorious. That loss of manpower and the increase of contact with 'civilized' states made Gauls more "hedonistic" than before.
DestroyerOfSense000 3 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000
Greece were victorious , well except the defeat from the macedonians , the gaul left Greece by themself , and Gaul were still more powerull then Germans even after 300 BC the belgea always pushed back the germans and even invaded them many times , only the Helvetii had lost to Germans .
NasriTheNewKing 3 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000
Well they thought it was more powerfull because gauls weren't divided as in 52 BC , they used to have kings during that time , such as Brennos , even Alexander the great discribed them as the bravest warriors he had met , he even asked to them to be his bodyguards .
NasriTheNewKing 3 months ago
@evolooshion I guess that since 1 month you have been responded. But since it's in the highest rated comments I wanted to clarify one thing: When Rome conquered Gaul, Rome was pagan. They didn't have the same paganic religion, but they were pagan, and they used women as political property LONG before the empire accepted christianity.
maaderllin 2 months ago
@evolooshion They were not enlightened, they just hadn't been corrupted as much yet...
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 Just to be sure we're talking about the same thing, what's your definition of enlightenment?
evolooshion 2 months ago
@evolooshion Making decisions based on logic, truth, and goodwill... not simply for power or otherwise... we haven't even reached that yet
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 I might sound like I'm being aggressive in my response. I'm just mentioning now that any negativity is not intended. As you said that we haven't reached that yet, it's because Western society is actually one of the less enlightened societies of the ancient world. In fact, it may be the bottom of the barrel. Of course, it's the one whose influence was everlasting so people might seem otherwise. The enlightenment revolution was simply putting another layer on corruption
evolooshion 2 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 (comment number 2) The Celts were rather enlightened from everything I've read. Their political system had a ton of it. I could list it but it would take a lot of characters. Also, I attempted putting a response about women not being used as political property, but all four times I tried to post it Youtube wouldn't let it pass. So I gave up. I'll try again :). Most of the women with evident power seemed to be in areas farther away from Rome and less "civilized"
evolooshion 2 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 (Comment number 3). Boudica was a queen/leader in the British isles. It is true that polygamy was a reality. However, women were quite promiscuous as well. One Celtic woman was quoted "We fulfill the necessity of nature much better than Roman women do, for we have intercourse openly with the best, whereas you are abused secretly by the least," The flaxen haired maidens of the north are trained in sports and war while our gentle ladies are content to do their womanly duties"
evolooshion 2 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 (Comment number 4),
Was said by Marcus Borealis.
To wrap up the idea of ancient societies Nonwstrn being rather enlightened, I would like to point out the Alans, a nomadic people whose love of freedom caused them to have a society without slavery; something that many would say, "we're not even that enlightened," about simply a couple hundred years ago (in contrast to millenniums ago with the Alans)
Sorry I responded so much. I figured it's best to make your case completely
evolooshion 2 months ago
@evolooshion Well, by your definition of enlightenment I'll have to agree with you. The Celts, Germans, Scythians and Alans had great personal freedom and a very happy population, with much leisure time. I would love that kind of lifestyle myself. But they were hellbent on war and conquest. I am in no way a pacifist, in fact I'm quite the opposite, but the tribal wars fought were not rebellions or wars of defense against an evil empire. *continued in next section*
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 But there were many tribal peoples that were very restricted and despotic. The Dacians (Getae), Huns, and Mongols were ruled by warlords who could kill any disobedient subject almost at will, and the Dacians in particular were ruled by the priests and a body of feudal lords, so they were not enlightened in my opinion.
PS: Don't worry, my responses are long too :P
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 First off I have to say, I can't believe the best discussion I've had about history in years is on the internet (most of my friends aren't as interested) :P. Yeah, the constant war is could be kind of brutal, but I do think that in some of societies, the majority of inhabitants were at least competent with their weapons, so there was less "civilian" casualties, although you can't say the same about all societies, often with women *Continued on next comment*
evolooshion 2 months ago
@evolooshion (although sometimes women held high status as has been said), and tribal peoples still raided areas of defenseless populations--there's sadly no way around it. As for slavery, although it was practiced by most cultures, it was sometimes less accepted (I read somewhere that non-southern Gauls frowned upon slavery, although further research would need to confirm this). By contrast, slavery was sometimes a norm. So although the severely brutal treatment in war did happen, *continued*
evolooshion 2 months ago
@evolooshion The nature and severity of the ferocity wasn't necessarily a worst case scenario :).
And as for the corruption, your statement made me reconsider how much of their morality (towards their fellow tribesmen/women) was enlightenment or just simple morality, as "enlightened" people might not be so easily influenced/corrupted
evolooshion 2 months ago
@evolooshion Most of my friends don't even know what I'm talking about when I talk about history so I'm glad too. I must admit I've read most of my information of Gaul and Germania from Caesar and Tacitus, who for obvious reasons were extremely biased. Most of the unbiased historical information I receive is synthesized in my own mind. I read various snippets and try to imagine how that society or person, etc. would feel. These various deductions have led me to believe... *continued*
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@evolooshion That we are just beyond the zenith of an age where material possessions and outward success are the ways people judge others. Tribal societies, before they learned to write, were very much moral and just, but they could only maintain justice by their laws, and when more "civilized" societies introduced their laws and advanced technology the tribesmen saw advantage in them and adopted them, not knowing that these advances came with the end of their freedom. *continued*
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@evolooshion Now we are in a "civilized" age where we are extremely intelligent but not very wise. Our scientific advances are beautiful but are prone to being used wrongly. The zenith, to the best of my knowledge, ended in the 1960's with the counterculture movements popular at the time. Of course, those movements lost most of their momentum within little more than a decade, but the spirit of freedom, made stronger by the Internet, will eventually enlighten us. :)
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@evolooshion They were meant to preserve honor or win glory or simply for plunder and loot. Pirates did the same thing, and they were personally free to a great extent, but we consider them to be mere brigands and often desperate men. I am not saying that all the native European tribes did was fight wars, but they fought almost constantly in one form or another. It was not seen as a curse, rather a blessing. I cannot pass judgement on that, *continued in next reply*
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@evolooshion but I can say that these wars often involved enslavement or outright massacre of certain groups of people, if not the whole tribe. But if you consider the happiness and general camaraderie in those tribes and nations, which I consider to be the greatest measure of goodness, they were better off than any other civilizations, before or after. In that sense of enlightenment they were far above most other civilizations. *continued in next reply*
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@evolooshion But those societies were easily corrupted. The Romans and the colonial British were masters of manipulative and corruptive techniques. The southern Gauls had already adopted much of Roman civilization before Caesar conquered them, and they then became more effeminate and weak in the eyes of their neighbors. The Germans and Britons, along with the peoples of the steppe, were not corrupted until much later. *continued in next reply*
DestroyerOfSense000 2 months ago
@evolooshion really i always thought the Celts viewed woman as the higher sex. At least that's what Aristotle said.
GrenMoyo 1 month ago
@GrenMoyo I wouldn't be surprised if that was true. At least in certain Celtic areas. After all the Celts were a collection of different societies. For instance the people of the British isles and Northern Gaul had more rights for women than Southern Gaul (which was more influenced by their Western neighbors). Does Aristotle specify which Celtic people he's talking about?
evolooshion 1 month ago
@evolooshion no he wasn't specific he only used the term "belligerent nations" in Reference to the people in the area which wasn't limited to Gaul or Gaelic tribes, I believe he also referenced the peoples in Magna Germania.
GrenMoyo 1 month ago
@GrenMoyo As I've heard Magna Germania was inhabited by priestesses, that seems likely (though I must admit, my Germanic knowledge isn't my best arena). As for the Celts, I heard is that women often got away with more than they did in Roman Greek realms (hooray!)
evolooshion 1 month ago
@evolooshion romans werent christians when they conquered gauls, besides, just because sexes were treated more equal (but not completely equal at all) it doesnt mean that gaulish society was more "enlightened", greeks were chauvinistic as hell but tolerated homosexuals as well to give an example that is very hard to compare ancient people. Also, behind all that mystic and romantic imagery, druids were oligarchs who played with power.
franvi77 1 month ago
@franvi77 1: I'm aware that Romans weren't Christians when they conquered Rome. They were still chauvinistic when they were Christians. Separate incidents, friend.
2: Secondly, several ancient cultures were cool with homosexuality. It's not until later they were scorned...
3: Maybe they weren't completely equal, but don't downplay the significat equality achieved. Women were warriors, rulers, ambassadors, and could divorce for just about any reason.
evolooshion 1 month ago
@franvi77 Part II:
4: Romans threw their unwanted babies in a dumpster. Celts had a social welfare for children. I'm not going to say the Celtic countries had achieved full enlightenment but there's a gap between the two (Celts and Romans), all things considered.at least in my opinion.
Disclaimer, I do not claim to know everything. Everything I have said is the result of what my research has made me believe--I am open to other information, as long as it is delivered respectfully :)
evolooshion 1 month ago
@evolooshion Celts made human sacrifices and beheading was considered a sport...
What Im trying to say is that you are not judging the customs of people from the XXI century, you cant blame romans for chauvinism or celts for "savages" (very wrong term to me) from the perspective of modern society, it is unfair.
franvi77 1 month ago
@franvi77 It is true what you say, I think after being on the top comments list my original comment was thrust out of context. The Celts had practices modern society would be appalled by, no doubt. But I was replying to a religious Christian who was scorning Eluveitie for their "pagan" and thus "evil" lyrics. I was just trying to say that it wasn't such a simple matter. I see how it may seem like I was glorifying the Gauls and demonizing the Romans, but I know it's not that simple \m/
evolooshion 1 month ago
@evolooshion Sorry, my bad...
franvi77 1 month ago
@franvi77 No worries bro!
evolooshion 1 month ago
@evolooshion You know gauls didn't give rights to women , in fact when they had to much daughters , they often gave the last one in sacrifice to the gods to have more sons , that's why they could build an anrmy of 300 000 - 400 000 warrors easily , Ceaser even captured hundred thousands gauls , most of them were sold has slave or sent in the arena as gladiators , around 300 000 gauls died during the Gallic war , and they were still enough to invade britain later .
NasriTheNewKing 4 days ago
@NasriTheNewKing
The gaulish population was around 3-4 millions , knowin that at the age of 12 - 13 years your were considered as adult , they could build an army of 800 000 men , imagine that unleashed against Rome lol . To bad Vercingetorix took the power to late . And you're right Romans were the real barbarians , actually they stole countless idea from the Celts , during centuries they used gaulish weapons before the famous gladius .
NasriTheNewKing 4 days ago
@NasriTheNewKing Part 1: I've never heard that first bit about the Gauls before. That's surprising to me. I must admit Celtic cultures aren't my main arena, though I read from a lot of sources that the Celts gave women several rights (ambassadors, rulers and even warriors), and also a piece about the relatively recent uncovering of a massive tomb of a seemingly wealthy Gaulish woman. That being said most of the support I later found for gender equality
evolooshion 4 days ago
@evolooshion was from the peoples of the British isles (Boudica, for instance), who needless to say were culturally different. I'd be interested to see your sources on the matter if you would be so kind as to give me a reference, fellow history fan :)
evolooshion 4 days ago
@evolooshion
I have a link about their sacrifices , it is in french , if you find a good translator , type sacrifice gaulois in google and normally it is the first link , but i also have a book who talk about France and his past , it starts around 600 BC to napoleon , they are something like 3-4 pages about the gauls .
NasriTheNewKing 4 days ago
@evolooshion
Do you also know that some celtic tribs used to eat the hearts of their enemies , i think it was in scotland , i've saw it in a documentary at the Tv long time ago , celt were also special , maybe some tribs gave more rights to women , but for the gauls i'm sure they didn't , maybe later under roman rules or in Asterix lol
NasriTheNewKing 4 days ago
@NasriTheNewKing Thanks for the link man! Personally I don't have anything against cultural cannibalism as fucked up as that may sound rofl. I doubt gaulish women had too much under the Roman rule though...their women weren't too fortunate either :(. And Aterix is fucking boss
evolooshion 4 days ago
@evolooshion
Well just a small part of celtic tribs practiced cannibalism , human sacrifice was more popular if i can say it lol , gauls even had different way to honor a god , some of them were put in a wooden box and then burnt , other were decapitated ( this one was for Toutatis ) and other were dismembered ( this was for the god of darkness ) , but around the 100 BC they started to make sacrifice with criminals . Posidonius wrote somethigna about that .
NasriTheNewKing 3 days ago
@NasriTheNewKing That would make more sense to use criminals. After all sacrificing respected tribal members would result in...grudges to say the least. At least that's what I'd imagine
evolooshion 2 days ago
@evolooshion Praise the God and Godess
MrChancellor03 2 weeks ago in playlist YouTube Mix for Eluveitie
@MrChancellor03 And the cheese my friend. Don't forget the cheese
evolooshion 2 weeks ago
@spartancripto Haha fuck all those people "not attacking" you; you should learn your place. For starters, you cannot even spell the name of your own god correctly. For another thing, to lump pagan and black metal lyrics into the same category is frankly offensive. I'm a pagan and I don't worship your Satan; learn the difference. And you can claim that something that is pagan is wrong when you stop celebrating all your major holidays, which were all stolen from the pagan peoples you "converted."
jadedhero1331 2 months ago 3
@jadedhero1331 Most Christians who post on here haven't even read the Bible. If they did they'd see that it was a holy book, not a warrior's speech. And many old Christian stories are based off pagan mythology, the tales about Satan included. Of course, many Christians think that God is all-powerful and yet he can't prevent Satan from doing what he does. There is no religion to me, it is all what we believe. I personally think two people believing the exact same thing is folly, but we are free.
DestroyerOfSense000 1 month ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 I completely agree with you, but I'm pretty sure most Christians in general haven't read the Bible. I tried to be Christian for awhile, but I got tired of trying to be something that I was not. Every time a Christian tries to tell me something, I counter by explaining things that were explicitly stated in the Bible, because I actually read it while they did not. I love Christmas time, because I enjoy laughing when people complain about it "not being about Jesus anymore."
jadedhero1331 1 month ago
@DestroyerOfSense000 A friend of mine tried to explain the not-stopping-Satan part to me once as God has the power to stop Satan but he chooses not to. I feel like that's hardly a better thing to believe...why would you want to believe in a god who actively chooses to allow evil to be visited upon his believers? I always thought the Satan story was kind of funny; it more or less states that if you disobey God in a big enough way, you get your own kingdom. It seems fairly counterproductive...
jadedhero1331 1 month ago
@jadedhero1331 I personally think that the whole story was a half-hearted attempt to reconcile Christian beliefs with pagan beliefs, especially in Greece. The apostles traveled so much in Greece and Greek Asia Minor that they probably found a story like that extremely useful. It might be genuine Christian mythology, I honestly don't know. But, in either case, before some zealot goes around talking about it they should consider its historical background.
DestroyerOfSense000 1 month ago
Gaul rocks! It was in France long before the Latins!
TheYeomanDroid 5 months ago
Epic button missing .......... :'(
S1O9U9I4D 5 months ago
ELUVEITIE = EPIC 4 LIFE :D
S1O9U9I4D 5 months ago
This is real music.... most US music suxs, this is real men music. Amon Amarth, Korpiklanni, Sabaton, Turisas, Hammerfall, Rammstien, Etc Hail from the US of A
Norsegod127 5 months ago
@Norsegod127 i've said this for the last two decades.......EU has way more talented bands then the US.
but i'll say this....the 80's era of thrash,punk,hardcore and crossover fucking killed!!
antkowiak666 5 months ago
@antkowiak666 O yes! American Metal and Rock in the 80s i love, Metallica, Rush, Pantera, ManOwar, Fear Factory, Slayer, etc... just some bands i like but i have way more favorites from Europe
Metal 4 Life Brother
Norsegod127 5 months ago
@Norsegod127 Rush is Canadian, thank you. ;)
CraigTheMusicDude 5 months ago
Comment removed
Norsegod127 5 months ago
"Music only?" I clearly hear the lyrics. Is there really no instumental versions of this song? ='(
Kzar5678 6 months ago
@Kzar5678 he was implying that there is no video.
CraigTheMusicDude 5 months ago
Makes me want to retake Ireland from the Catholics.
Dyslexic17Cow 6 months ago
R.I.P from Turkey
akoc1990 6 months ago
Dude this is awesome.
sleepwalker658 6 months ago
respect from bosnia
bosniancristianorona 6 months ago
pour le meilleur des metal folk
et qui les a inventés??
ashibe1 6 months ago in playlist Eluveitie + Dragonforce
I had a bad case of testicular torsion because the veins in my balls were head banging so badly that they cut off the blood flow to my balls, but the 5 minutes 11 seconds of this song allowed me to come to terms with the fact that my balls were probably going to get chopped off so I took a Blacktooth Grin that Dimebag recommended and kept the spirit going.
P.S. I still have my balls but I'd sacrifice them for the pleasure of everyone's ears.
rellekc 7 months ago
@rellekc 0_° lolwut
IllisarArchives 6 months ago
BUEN VIDEO AMIGO, SALUDOS DESDE MEXICO
ESPERO QUE LOS MEXICANOS NO SEAN DISCRIMINADOS JEJEJEJEJ, SALUDOS
bobinoslipknot90 7 months ago 2
woah. This just blew my fucking mind 0.0
boosag 7 months ago
What we want more ?
Beer
sleeping
Metal Chicks..
and..
Eluveitie !
RobertFlynn1990 7 months ago
i just found out i want to strangel 45 people with there own guts :D
Yshelomov 7 months ago
i just found out i want to strangel 456 people with there own guts :D
Yshelomov 7 months ago
@raggaification where the hell is my ass?!!
teeneshverma 7 months ago
This is an EPIC LIKE BUTTON
Terrorista101 7 months ago
a swear this is the most inspirational music on the face of the earth... anything celtic is amazing
ThePorchHonkie 7 months ago 2
WHERE THE FUKC IS THE DISLIKE BAR..????
teeneshverma 7 months ago
this song needs more credit + views, comon a half boy half girl sing baby all over again and gets 500 milion vieuws and a awesome song like this only 641 thousand?? something isnt write/
Nordarock 7 months ago 2
I have that band picture as my background :D
shapaza 8 months ago
First 12 seconds sounded like diablo 2.
ityup36 8 months ago
how is this music only?
love it anywayzz
throughlifeagain 8 months ago
@throughlifeagain It means that it doesn't have video, just image and the song. =D
Hail from RS!
FelipeHermod 8 months ago
I like these guys n gals cuz im half swiss and half german. family was from Bern, Switz
Captainredneckdiesel 9 months ago
damn.... this is epic......... this is epic fight music
rvbsmcaboose 9 months ago
Caesar was an asshole.
ChaosIncarnate7 9 months ago 5
This song should be in Total War games
sandamn85 9 months ago 4
the bridge is just epic
SUBXero92 9 months ago
YeeaH(L) i love this music:D
ToniXTremo 10 months ago
40 weak minds and 80 blasphemous ears went def listening to the first 30 seconds of this epicness. Thou shall never vote again.
s1k0ne 10 months ago 17
it's suppose to say on the title
Eluveitie - Your Gaulish War[Perfection Only]
artiom1034 10 months ago
And my bow
ibidaxiuero 10 months ago
Angry hobbits lolz
Henners1991 10 months ago
Jesus dident die for us he died for FOLK METAL!!!
Giggymog123 11 months ago
@Drreviewman Mr. Crowley?
lovemagames 11 months ago
only 600,832 views? there should be billions!
tornbetween2worlds6 11 months ago
There is much history to Gaul you know.... it wasn't just an idyllic LOTR style Elvish forest
ChumAddictAnonymous 11 months ago
its like metal... with flutes!
evilresidence4 11 months ago
@evilresidence4 It is!ö
and it is awesome!
anahhiii 11 months ago
@evilresidence4 it is a genre of metal called folk metal ;)
GreekPiranha 11 months ago
@GreekPiranha Celtic/Folk Death Metal*
starwolfff 11 months ago 2
@evilresidence4 Sometimes they use violins too. But its rare to find folk metal with organ pipes, that would sound cool. Ozzy is not folk metal.
Drreviewman 11 months ago
@Drreviewman I never said Ozzy was folk metal lol
evilresidence4 11 months ago
@evilresidence4 I know I just thought it was worth stating. Because I heard an awsome song from him with organ pipes in it.
Drreviewman 11 months ago
@WTFmoronio not true at all. They were unable to conquer the area now know as Scotland. And they never set foot in Ireland.
CTUKeyes 11 months ago
trying to start a folk metal band in america...i play guitar, bodhran, and irish tin whistle
briwylde 11 months ago 4
@briwylde Best of luck. Love to join you but I'm in Switzerland...
syntheticskull 11 months ago
Love In love
Insanedemon100 1 year ago
I am a celtic druid, my big plan is creating a world full of green beer and celtic warriors! If you agree, give me your hands! We need blood for sacrifice!!!
BayKubidikTR 1 year ago 333
@BayKubidikTR Hehehe, Hail!
Vniveri25 1 year ago
@BayKubidikTR
You do know,,, there are better sources of power than blood..... Druids will be druids though :P
persainai 11 months ago
@BayKubidikTR you're a celtic druid?. all celtic druids got slaughtered by the romans. as what WTFmoronio said.
jaimeexd 11 months ago
@jaimeexd so, we need to resurrect them. someone call a necromancer!
BayKubidikTR 11 months ago
@jaimeexd Yup, rounded up in Anglesey and slain. Cymru am Byth.
mafoota 10 months ago
@mafoota thanks for your confirment
jaimeexd 10 months ago
@BayKubidikTR I'm with you on that one..Dunn Clan at you're service lol
MikeMcMikerson 11 months ago
@BayKubidikTR i dont belive in blood, only spirit
TheAmbiorixXx 10 months ago
@BayKubidikTR
Don't druids believe in peace and harmony?
bitcheslikemahtankin 10 months ago
@bitcheslikemahtankin Sometimes, Peace can only be achieve through war (Nas once made a wonderful song called 'War is necessary'). But personnaly, I only believe in war as a final solution, so in a way you are right. Peace! from a Belgian apprentice-Druid.
Manidebard 8 months ago
@BayKubidikTR You have my sword!
vinterfroest 10 months ago
@BayKubidikTR And My Axe
clockworkmike83 10 months ago
@BayKubidikTR hehe lets take the hoppers blood they will not miss it (muhahahahahahaha)
marvinbigus 10 months ago
@BayKubidikTR You have my axe...
cazzarox6653 9 months ago
@cazzarox6653 And my bow
DeadStriker12 9 months ago
@DeadStriker12 and my!...erm...Arrows!...to...erm...supply your bow...XD
TheBambiniGiant 9 months ago 8
@TheBambiniGiant
And my Intercontinental Ballistic Missile.
e1nherjar 9 months ago
@TheBambiniGiant and my sniper and mg-42 team!!
compound48mercs 8 months ago
@compound48mercs And my MORTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRR COMBAAAAT CANNOOONNN!!!!!
FelipeHermod 8 months ago
@BayKubidikTR i would give my heart, my blood and my undying soul to become such a world...
keithelstone 9 months ago
@BayKubidikTR Thats what babies are for. There my beards favorite anyway.
aeroangrymoose 8 months ago in playlist Eluveitie + Dragonforce
@BayKubidikTR the pagans are with you!
mRjAcKmAn95 8 months ago
@BayKubidikTR YESSIR!
Mephisto2913 8 months ago
@BayKubidikTR TAKE MINE TAKE MINE TAKE MINE.... Oh wait.... Will I die??...... TAKE MINE TAKE MINE TAKE MINE
Kachinawa 8 months ago