Added: 2 years ago
From: moeezS
Views: 10,032
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Haha I would never feel sorry for any officer, you commit to the job that is your call. Criminals commit to a crime, can't feel sorry for them either.

  • You're goin back

  • They didn't killed him because they needed him alive, those are the risks of looking for a prime suspect

  • This is why i keep my Mossberg 500 Loaded with 3mm BeanBag's.

    So you dont have to hesitate to pump and pull. shoot first, ask questions later.

    Less Lethal, No blood.

    Just call 911 while your attacker and or home invader lies on the ground groaning in agony.

  • This shit is stupid. He shoots at an officer so she just stands there and lets him run away? And then he drops the gun and she holsters hers? Seriously? "OH HE JUST SHOT AT ME BUT HE DROPPED HIS GUN SO EVERYTHING IS OK NOW." No. I'm glad I don't watch this retarded ass show.

  • Comment removed

  • @hewster1

    Deleting your comment when you realize how stupid you are. Priceless.

  • Sorry I will repost it and make you look like an idiot.

    You can't shoot a fleeing suspect unless you think they are an immediate threat. learn the law before you speak.

    Trolls on youtube? Priceless.

  • @hewster1

    You must have some sort of mental handicap or something kid. If you think firing a gun at police isn't an "immediate threat" then you need to stop talking. Also, how is stating facts "trolling"?

  • Comment removed

  • @CoChicken1337

    Tennessee Vs. Garner.

    Fleeing suspect, gun on ground. The end. Would I have shot him? Absolutely. I am just playing devils advocate and what his lawyer would say, and depending on the state, he would win. (Cali, Mass, MD, NJ, etc)

  • @CoChicken1337 Maybe you should read up on some law, kid.

  • @hewster1

    Police have shot people for a lot less than that. If you haven't noticed, even when police are wrong they're right. The actual "law" has nothing to do with it.

  • He refused to drop the knife and had already shot an officer. They used less than lethal force when they could have legally put three rounds into his chest.

  • LAPD...feel bad for them...shitty pay and go through hell everyday

  • shitty pay? are you fucken serious? its a fact that the lapd is the highest payed cops in the country! look it up man!! its amazing pay with great benefits!! only the lapd!!!

  • Good TV, but bad shoot. A bean bag shot to the chest from that distance could tear someone's aorta. In that situation you'd want to go with the forearm of the knife hand. Pretty good representation of the bruising afterward, though.

  • that's why it is considered LESS than lethal.

  • Well, the forearms a rather small area to shoot at for a moving target. I'd aim for the thigh. You're right though, I wouldn't shoot a guy in the chest with a beanbag at that range.

  • You would think so, but unless someone is sprinting, it can be done - especially from this distance. I'm a municipal police officer, and to carry beanbag rounds we had to qualify on a rubber cutout from distances up to, if I recall correctly, about 50 feet, hitting both thigh and forearm on demand. Looks daunting, especially with the cutout moving from your last round, but if you're any shot at all it's not too difficult.

  • He had a knife, how was he supposed to get close enough to hit him with the back of a knife? [long time ago you commented I know.]

  • He could've thrown the knife.

  • And possibly killed him?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more