I'm not fully convinced by Marx's theory that surplus capital leads to the need for capital exports leading to the need for War. It's true in part, except that any elites wanting to rule over another group would benefit from enslaving the third world (regardless of whether it was based on a profit/capital system) & would lead to War. Just as War existed, long before Capital.
I agree that once you've fully exploited your own workforce, to get richer you've then got to exploit others countries...
...& the rich elites will be able to profit with less risk from an unsaturated market by channeling investment into a country that is forced to give their investment top priority, but I don't see how that negates the possibility of a state ran economy from doing the same thing.
Just as - in a similar fashion - military keynesianism would be just as effective at stimulating the economy in a Communist country.
wow.. what a comment section..make arguments about the ideas, not the person. ad hominen arguments are logically invalid..great word play below..thx for comments..!!!
Listen though, in national-anarchy you could have a tribe based on your values and identity, and I could have mine. Sure eventually there would be conflicts, but we wouldn't face repression our entire lives.
I actually read a bit about national anarchism years ago (in case you haven't noticed i am a bit of an ideological junkie). I just fear violence being done against me or someone like me, thats why i was on the offensive. You have to realize though that if the urge for me wasn't so strong to be this way I wouldn't do what I do in the face of such fear. I don't care if you think I am nasty, I just want to be left to live peacefully... Just try not to hate someone based on their basic identitys all
Well I am naturally repulsed, like I have said before, and repulsion can lead to hate very easily in the face of conflict, such as when you called me a 'Nazi' and wished my death. However, I respect that you have the courage to exhibit yourself. I just feel that we are very different, and although we can communicate, it is best if we do not blend. I will not act with violence if there is no threat to me. You do not seem very threatening, but I didn't appreciate you starting the insults.
And 'god' didn't make them, men and women did. This is not the paradise, this is not a utopia. This is earth. Just because a being was created, doesn't mean it is beautiful or right. This is why communism will never work. We will forever be enemies. I embrace that.
wtf happened to the first part of that, well, i said yes, tribal societies did have territories but the purpose wasn't to decimate the opponent and steal their land for cultivate - ie as a platform for the extraction of labor - war was ritual - war did not take on this form because when humans lived as hunter gatherers their was a super abundance of land... and thier was this because their was no conception of using territory for the purpose of extracting labor from corvees
"You don't think there is more personal freedom in the United States and the West under even High Neo-Con Imperialism than Putin-Stalinism? It is because of our national character..."
I think there is more personal freedom 'neo-con imperialism' than there was in Stalin's Russia, that is true. I'd sure as hell rather live in a corporate-run land than a dictatorship, even though I oppose both.
And there is nothing wrong with surplus, it allows the advancement of mankind. If there wasn't surplus, you wouldn't be connected to the internet right now.
OK, you misquoted me a few times, so lets call even on that.
Listen, I don't care how communism was 90,000 years ago. I know that communism promotes uniformity, equality, and even distribution of wealth. I oppose all of this. I will never support communism, no matter what year or state its in.
you are wrong though. what you think you know is wrong. What you think of as Communism: Stalinism promotes pretended evenness and calls itself "Communist" but in reality is closer a kin to capitalism. We have to go back to the paleolithic to see what communism really looked like because all social formations for the past 11,000 years or so have been tainted by the state apparatus. communism in the future based on technology would use science and resources to create a super abundance of wealth
I agree with this, but from my understanding, old tribal cultures were more similar to national-anarchism. Either way, "national-anarchism" is the way. Communism is a poisoned word.
I'm not a nazi, I'm a national-anarchist. You didn't see me bashing you because you are a faggot transvestite, but since you brought it down to that level, I guess I have to.
There we go. You fell into the trap. While I do hate Nazis (i.e. people who conspicuously promote Nazism i.e. YOU) you did just proved yourself to be the completely backwards reactionary you are. Thank you. So go join your heroes.
I did not fall into a trap. Although I find Nazism interesting, and quite humorous for being overtly politically incorrect in this modern day and age, I do not want a dictatorship. Therefore, I am not a Nazi. Just because I find transvestites and faggots degenerative does not make me a supporter of dictatorships.
LOL, ok, so you disagree with the political superstructure... but you agree that anyone who is not straight and white is degenerate... i hope you are swallowed up by a gorge in the earth when the Elohim him return... Because they aren't blond aryan super people.
I do not agree that anyone who is not white and straight is a degenerate. I believe that anyone who is not white and straight is different than me, and therefore should be treated differently. Not all faggots are degenerative, only the ones who openly promote it, such as you. I never said anything about 'blonde Aryan super people'.
Well, we've gotten to the root of the matter your psychosis, and my being a degenerative tranny faggot. you're just digging yourself deeper in a hole. so i guess i should just quietly hide, or at best repress who i am for your greater sexual-racialist good, huh? Oh, differently? How should we be treated differently? Ghettos? Concentration camps? What is it? And what do you consider open promotion? Being openly gay or transsexual? You would be best suited living in Iran.
I think it would be best if faggots didn't openly promote their degenerative sexuality. You don't see urophiles marching in the streets holding signs saying 'drinking your piss is great', nor will I ever want to see that. I don't hate homosexuals because they're homosexual, I hate homosexuals who promote it and feel the need to show everyone.
So I guess you really hate people who are transgender, since they are biologically men but are mentally female. So essentially you hate people living the way God made them. I rest my case.
Possibly, because it has close ties with the homosexual culture. Either way it is degenerative and I don't want to see it. Is this unfair? Too fucking bad, it is my nature. I naturally find transvestites repulsive. You find me repulsive? That's your nature. There is nothing wrong with natural hate, we are human.
And we get closer to the core "there is nothing wrong with natural hate". We are spiritual beings. I suppose you believe humans are incapable of enlightenment and defeating hate? By the way - the physical reality is a simulation of the spiritual one - anything and everything here is possible. I really don't care if you are repulsed by me, but I see people like you as violently dangerous to the existance of people like me.
I too believe that we are spiritual beings, and I too believe that we are capable of enlightenment and defeating hate... but not forever. There will always be hate because there will always be problems and conflicts. After all, this is earth.
I also understand that you find me dangerous to your existence. You must understand that I do not hate you for your preferences, but I am naturally repulsed by your nature. There is no way of changing that.
And in the future don't restrain your hate out of political correctness or politeness. Come out with it openly so your totally evil ideas can be smashed in this Greater War...
what a great video man. and yeah, i don't think marxism is overrated - if anything it is way underrated because the surplus labor theory of value is the most well kept scheming secret in society - a bigger scheme and cheat than taxes ever will be and if people knew how the system actually operated on a day to day basis to perpetuate itself i doubt they would stand for it ... 'marxism is the opium of the intellectuals', lol, awesome.
Karl Marx failed not confronting Proudhon and Bakunin. Marxism and Freudianism contributed in certain ways to the human knowledge but are so fucking over rated today!
It is funny the way Freud describes the lust of a son by his mother, I myself have felt lust for my aunt (sister of my mother) and her daughter (19 years old) BUT FUCKING NEVER BY MY MOTHER MAN! Karl Marx also talks about solidarity to construct a better world, how come if the world is filled with a bunch of greedy assholes?!
Great video! It would be ideal if anyone could learn how things really are - instead of what media and school books tell us, explore the planet freely - without any burecracy or filling papers, experience sadomasochism, drugs, etc, instead of safe family entertainment. Nobody would need leaders anymore, because all the information, power, food, etc, would be accessable to all, not just a few. Amusement park for explorers, free-thinkers and artists.
Actually, now that I think about it, I'd rather live in a capitalist state, like the US, than a communist state, like China. So I think capitalism might be better, even though they're both bad.
China clearly is not a communist state, in fact, as an anarchist you should know the term "communist state" is completely contradictory - for communism to exist there can be no state apparatus. Under even Mao it was a state-capitalist regime leeching towards modernity under millenia of asiatic despotism... the same holds true for the USSR.
I know China isn't true to the communist ideology, and I know that Soviet Russia wasn't either. This is because communism is a flawed utopian ideology that ultimately corrupts in practice.
I also oppose anarchist communism because it is not true anarchy. Plus, not everyone is equal. If everyone was equal then natural selection would not exist and evolution would never happen. Communism is simply against the nature of mankind.
But no. Thats not why it failed. The idea of concentrating wealth and the forces of production to create a super production of goods is not utopian at all, and is already even happening under global state capitalism. whatever the "ism" that uses it for the populus will be doesn't matter, but either that scenario or total destruction are the only two. Russia and China are asiatic states with absolutely no experience with anything remotely democratic - the recent invasion of Georgia proves
Russia's totalitarian national character transcends "Marxism" and "Democracy". You do not really believe humans evolved unaided from apes do you? The "course of nature" when sentient beings begin to appear and gain a high enough level of illumination of things eventually becomes subject to the understanding and will of those sentient beings. The very existance of humans and the sudden appearance of the state apparatus from the neolithic era proves this...
I know that they are totalitarian, but that is what a communist government becomes. Even if there is no government, I oppose communism because it opposes human nature. I think those '90,000 years of tribal society' you speak of were not communist, but national anarchist.
I am not sure if you know what the true definition of "communism" is, but rather are thinking of capital "C" "Communism". Small "c" communism is when a group of people know no such things as property, the state, organized religion, the division of labor or classes based on the division of labor. Do some real sociological research. Even bourgeois theoreticians agree the paleolithic was primitive communism...
Thus, truly, this kind of condition, a condition of staelessness and the non-division of labor is the true life blood of human nature. state and class society has made human nature violent, paranoid and autocratic... when there is an abundance of the necessities of life hording becomes an act of conspicuous mental illness.
Look up 'national-anarchism' on wikipedia for informal reading. I'd post the link but YouTube filters links. It is essentially tribal anarchism. I find it more likely that early tribes were separatist, based on natural instinct, and did not follow a system of equality, because that is not the natural order. I believe they also had territory, but it just wasn't formal.
of integrating the territory into the political elite which based its power on extraction enmasse of labor. Instead the pre-state tribal wars were little more than ritual.
"The idea of concentrating wealth and the forces of production to create a super production of goods is not utopian at all" I know, I never said it was...
I did not speak of the modern Russia, I spoke of Soviet Russia. That is true that they aren't democratic, but even nation-wide democracy fails. The only democracy that works is on a tribal level.
You don't think there is more personal freedom in the United States and the West under even High Neo-Con Imperialism than Putin-Stalinism? It is because of our national character...
funny, if it never worked humans wouldn't have existed for 90,000 years in tribal society before the nephilim told them about the state, religion and the pick-axe and spade...
There is a difference between anarchy and communism. In communism, the government runs the economy and gives all workers equal pay. Because of this enormous power that the government has, it easily corrupts and steals wealth. Look at China or Soviet Russia. The leaders are wealthy and the workers are poor, even though they are all supposed to get equal pay.
I have nothing against anarchy, and in fact, I'm beginning to identify as a national anarchist.
have you even read any bakunin or maybe even a little kropotkin ... national anarchist? wouldn't that just be what we have now - "a future of never ending enslaved civil disorder" to quote Slayer i.e. Controlled Chaos. Because that is the only non-stateless, or communist version of anarchism i can think of.
i know i left out alot..but the class struggle is about who controls the economic surplus in society...ever since the beginning of history..*correction 'the current war against Iraq*, not Iran..editors note..slacker614 must be opiated..
yeah, weed, mushrooms and LSD is a better choice. i have a high tolerance for opiates..i have taken a fatal dose and survived ......it just feels so damn good....i mix them w/ alcohol, which is a very bad idea, but SLACKER614 is not a role model...lol..peace, my friend.
This has been flagged as spam show
I'd like to know what you think of G.K. Chesterton's Distributism.
xxdiogenescynicxx 2 years ago
I'm not fully convinced by Marx's theory that surplus capital leads to the need for capital exports leading to the need for War. It's true in part, except that any elites wanting to rule over another group would benefit from enslaving the third world (regardless of whether it was based on a profit/capital system) & would lead to War. Just as War existed, long before Capital.
I agree that once you've fully exploited your own workforce, to get richer you've then got to exploit others countries...
CapitalistHolocaust 3 years ago 2
...& the rich elites will be able to profit with less risk from an unsaturated market by channeling investment into a country that is forced to give their investment top priority, but I don't see how that negates the possibility of a state ran economy from doing the same thing.
Just as - in a similar fashion - military keynesianism would be just as effective at stimulating the economy in a Communist country.
CapitalistHolocaust 3 years ago 2
wow.. what a comment section..make arguments about the ideas, not the person. ad hominen arguments are logically invalid..great word play below..thx for comments..!!!
SLACKER614 3 years ago
Listen though, in national-anarchy you could have a tribe based on your values and identity, and I could have mine. Sure eventually there would be conflicts, but we wouldn't face repression our entire lives.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago 2
I actually read a bit about national anarchism years ago (in case you haven't noticed i am a bit of an ideological junkie). I just fear violence being done against me or someone like me, thats why i was on the offensive. You have to realize though that if the urge for me wasn't so strong to be this way I wouldn't do what I do in the face of such fear. I don't care if you think I am nasty, I just want to be left to live peacefully... Just try not to hate someone based on their basic identitys all
catalineas 3 years ago
Well I am naturally repulsed, like I have said before, and repulsion can lead to hate very easily in the face of conflict, such as when you called me a 'Nazi' and wished my death. However, I respect that you have the courage to exhibit yourself. I just feel that we are very different, and although we can communicate, it is best if we do not blend. I will not act with violence if there is no threat to me. You do not seem very threatening, but I didn't appreciate you starting the insults.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago 3
my only weapon is my charm/beauty ;)
catalineas 3 years ago 3
Erm....... hahahahah!
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago 2
hey, you laugh but i have men lining up from my door to the other side of the town... i am pretty secure with myself.
(PS Sorry Slacker614 for using your video for this).
catalineas 3 years ago 2
And 'god' didn't make them, men and women did. This is not the paradise, this is not a utopia. This is earth. Just because a being was created, doesn't mean it is beautiful or right. This is why communism will never work. We will forever be enemies. I embrace that.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
wtf happened to the first part of that, well, i said yes, tribal societies did have territories but the purpose wasn't to decimate the opponent and steal their land for cultivate - ie as a platform for the extraction of labor - war was ritual - war did not take on this form because when humans lived as hunter gatherers their was a super abundance of land... and thier was this because their was no conception of using territory for the purpose of extracting labor from corvees
catalineas 3 years ago
"You don't think there is more personal freedom in the United States and the West under even High Neo-Con Imperialism than Putin-Stalinism? It is because of our national character..."
I think there is more personal freedom 'neo-con imperialism' than there was in Stalin's Russia, that is true. I'd sure as hell rather live in a corporate-run land than a dictatorship, even though I oppose both.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
And there is nothing wrong with surplus, it allows the advancement of mankind. If there wasn't surplus, you wouldn't be connected to the internet right now.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
OK - i never said there wasa problem with surplus - IN FACT I said a super-abundance of goods is the way forward.
catalineas 3 years ago
OK, you misquoted me a few times, so lets call even on that.
Listen, I don't care how communism was 90,000 years ago. I know that communism promotes uniformity, equality, and even distribution of wealth. I oppose all of this. I will never support communism, no matter what year or state its in.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
you are wrong though. what you think you know is wrong. What you think of as Communism: Stalinism promotes pretended evenness and calls itself "Communist" but in reality is closer a kin to capitalism. We have to go back to the paleolithic to see what communism really looked like because all social formations for the past 11,000 years or so have been tainted by the state apparatus. communism in the future based on technology would use science and resources to create a super abundance of wealth
catalineas 3 years ago
I agree with this, but from my understanding, old tribal cultures were more similar to national-anarchism. Either way, "national-anarchism" is the way. Communism is a poisoned word.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
Either way I just realized you are a Nazi. Speaking of Poison ... Why don't you go poison yourself like your heroes?
catalineas 3 years ago
I'm not a nazi, I'm a national-anarchist. You didn't see me bashing you because you are a faggot transvestite, but since you brought it down to that level, I guess I have to.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
There we go. You fell into the trap. While I do hate Nazis (i.e. people who conspicuously promote Nazism i.e. YOU) you did just proved yourself to be the completely backwards reactionary you are. Thank you. So go join your heroes.
catalineas 3 years ago
I did not fall into a trap. Although I find Nazism interesting, and quite humorous for being overtly politically incorrect in this modern day and age, I do not want a dictatorship. Therefore, I am not a Nazi. Just because I find transvestites and faggots degenerative does not make me a supporter of dictatorships.
Have a nice day.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
LOL, ok, so you disagree with the political superstructure... but you agree that anyone who is not straight and white is degenerate... i hope you are swallowed up by a gorge in the earth when the Elohim him return... Because they aren't blond aryan super people.
catalineas 3 years ago
I do not agree that anyone who is not white and straight is a degenerate. I believe that anyone who is not white and straight is different than me, and therefore should be treated differently. Not all faggots are degenerative, only the ones who openly promote it, such as you. I never said anything about 'blonde Aryan super people'.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
Well, we've gotten to the root of the matter your psychosis, and my being a degenerative tranny faggot. you're just digging yourself deeper in a hole. so i guess i should just quietly hide, or at best repress who i am for your greater sexual-racialist good, huh? Oh, differently? How should we be treated differently? Ghettos? Concentration camps? What is it? And what do you consider open promotion? Being openly gay or transsexual? You would be best suited living in Iran.
catalineas 3 years ago
oops, sorry, they're not white.
catalineas 3 years ago
I think it would be best if faggots didn't openly promote their degenerative sexuality. You don't see urophiles marching in the streets holding signs saying 'drinking your piss is great', nor will I ever want to see that. I don't hate homosexuals because they're homosexual, I hate homosexuals who promote it and feel the need to show everyone.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
So I guess you really hate people who are transgender, since they are biologically men but are mentally female. So essentially you hate people living the way God made them. I rest my case.
catalineas 3 years ago
I never said that I hate them.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
Would you consider me going out dressed as a female like I do regularly promoting homosexuality? You just said you hated that.
catalineas 3 years ago
Possibly, because it has close ties with the homosexual culture. Either way it is degenerative and I don't want to see it. Is this unfair? Too fucking bad, it is my nature. I naturally find transvestites repulsive. You find me repulsive? That's your nature. There is nothing wrong with natural hate, we are human.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
And we get closer to the core "there is nothing wrong with natural hate". We are spiritual beings. I suppose you believe humans are incapable of enlightenment and defeating hate? By the way - the physical reality is a simulation of the spiritual one - anything and everything here is possible. I really don't care if you are repulsed by me, but I see people like you as violently dangerous to the existance of people like me.
catalineas 3 years ago 2
I too believe that we are spiritual beings, and I too believe that we are capable of enlightenment and defeating hate... but not forever. There will always be hate because there will always be problems and conflicts. After all, this is earth.
I also understand that you find me dangerous to your existence. You must understand that I do not hate you for your preferences, but I am naturally repulsed by your nature. There is no way of changing that.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
And in the future don't restrain your hate out of political correctness or politeness. Come out with it openly so your totally evil ideas can be smashed in this Greater War...
catalineas 3 years ago
I wasn't restraining my hate out of political correctness and politeness. We were discussing communism, not you being a degenerative faggot.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
awesome video man, I don't know if you watch my videos ( I know your subbed) but I defiantly agree.
napalmtube 3 years ago
what a great video man. and yeah, i don't think marxism is overrated - if anything it is way underrated because the surplus labor theory of value is the most well kept scheming secret in society - a bigger scheme and cheat than taxes ever will be and if people knew how the system actually operated on a day to day basis to perpetuate itself i doubt they would stand for it ... 'marxism is the opium of the intellectuals', lol, awesome.
catalineas 3 years ago
Karl Marx failed not confronting Proudhon and Bakunin. Marxism and Freudianism contributed in certain ways to the human knowledge but are so fucking over rated today!
It is funny the way Freud describes the lust of a son by his mother, I myself have felt lust for my aunt (sister of my mother) and her daughter (19 years old) BUT FUCKING NEVER BY MY MOTHER MAN! Karl Marx also talks about solidarity to construct a better world, how come if the world is filled with a bunch of greedy assholes?!
DoktorTakashiro 3 years ago 2
under capitalism, man exploits man, under socialism , its the other way around..
SLACKER614 3 years ago
love the distorted on many levels.
...and some what agree.
Peace Out
czarwright 3 years ago
keep the good vids coming!
Untouchable0ne 3 years ago
Communism is utopian.
thewolf32 3 years ago
Humans = Idiots. Therefore, Communism as we know it = worthless.
MistakenGodliness 3 years ago
"Nazi" ... "Fascist." Sorry, I thought I'd reply to my own comment before somebody else did.
MistakenGodliness 3 years ago
You damn Jew.
thewolf32 3 years ago
"Heil, mein Führer!"
MistakenGodliness 3 years ago
hahahahahahaahah
SLACKER614 3 years ago
Great video! It would be ideal if anyone could learn how things really are - instead of what media and school books tell us, explore the planet freely - without any burecracy or filling papers, experience sadomasochism, drugs, etc, instead of safe family entertainment. Nobody would need leaders anymore, because all the information, power, food, etc, would be accessable to all, not just a few. Amusement park for explorers, free-thinkers and artists.
DOPEPHILE 3 years ago
i like that idea of amusement park for explorers..very good idea..
SLACKER614 3 years ago
i thought we already experienced sado-masochism on a day to day basis.......
catalineas 3 years ago
Communism is good on paper, but it is against nature... just like Christianity. That's why it corrupts... just like Christianity.
Look at any communist state in history and there has been major corruption.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
Capitalism is even worse, based on exploitation and greed.
DOPEPHILE 3 years ago 2
Very true.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
Actually, now that I think about it, I'd rather live in a capitalist state, like the US, than a communist state, like China. So I think capitalism might be better, even though they're both bad.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
China clearly is not a communist state, in fact, as an anarchist you should know the term "communist state" is completely contradictory - for communism to exist there can be no state apparatus. Under even Mao it was a state-capitalist regime leeching towards modernity under millenia of asiatic despotism... the same holds true for the USSR.
catalineas 3 years ago
I know China isn't true to the communist ideology, and I know that Soviet Russia wasn't either. This is because communism is a flawed utopian ideology that ultimately corrupts in practice.
I also oppose anarchist communism because it is not true anarchy. Plus, not everyone is equal. If everyone was equal then natural selection would not exist and evolution would never happen. Communism is simply against the nature of mankind.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
But no. Thats not why it failed. The idea of concentrating wealth and the forces of production to create a super production of goods is not utopian at all, and is already even happening under global state capitalism. whatever the "ism" that uses it for the populus will be doesn't matter, but either that scenario or total destruction are the only two. Russia and China are asiatic states with absolutely no experience with anything remotely democratic - the recent invasion of Georgia proves
catalineas 3 years ago
Russia's totalitarian national character transcends "Marxism" and "Democracy". You do not really believe humans evolved unaided from apes do you? The "course of nature" when sentient beings begin to appear and gain a high enough level of illumination of things eventually becomes subject to the understanding and will of those sentient beings. The very existance of humans and the sudden appearance of the state apparatus from the neolithic era proves this...
catalineas 3 years ago
I know that they are totalitarian, but that is what a communist government becomes. Even if there is no government, I oppose communism because it opposes human nature. I think those '90,000 years of tribal society' you speak of were not communist, but national anarchist.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
I am not sure if you know what the true definition of "communism" is, but rather are thinking of capital "C" "Communism". Small "c" communism is when a group of people know no such things as property, the state, organized religion, the division of labor or classes based on the division of labor. Do some real sociological research. Even bourgeois theoreticians agree the paleolithic was primitive communism...
catalineas 3 years ago
Thus, truly, this kind of condition, a condition of staelessness and the non-division of labor is the true life blood of human nature. state and class society has made human nature violent, paranoid and autocratic... when there is an abundance of the necessities of life hording becomes an act of conspicuous mental illness.
catalineas 3 years ago
Look up 'national-anarchism' on wikipedia for informal reading. I'd post the link but YouTube filters links. It is essentially tribal anarchism. I find it more likely that early tribes were separatist, based on natural instinct, and did not follow a system of equality, because that is not the natural order. I believe they also had territory, but it just wasn't formal.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
of integrating the territory into the political elite which based its power on extraction enmasse of labor. Instead the pre-state tribal wars were little more than ritual.
catalineas 3 years ago
"The idea of concentrating wealth and the forces of production to create a super production of goods is not utopian at all" I know, I never said it was...
I did not speak of the modern Russia, I spoke of Soviet Russia. That is true that they aren't democratic, but even nation-wide democracy fails. The only democracy that works is on a tribal level.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
You don't think there is more personal freedom in the United States and the West under even High Neo-Con Imperialism than Putin-Stalinism? It is because of our national character...
catalineas 3 years ago
Communism does not work. At all. Ever.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
funny, if it never worked humans wouldn't have existed for 90,000 years in tribal society before the nephilim told them about the state, religion and the pick-axe and spade...
catalineas 3 years ago
There is a difference between anarchy and communism. In communism, the government runs the economy and gives all workers equal pay. Because of this enormous power that the government has, it easily corrupts and steals wealth. Look at China or Soviet Russia. The leaders are wealthy and the workers are poor, even though they are all supposed to get equal pay.
I have nothing against anarchy, and in fact, I'm beginning to identify as a national anarchist.
AnarchyintheKKK 3 years ago
have you even read any bakunin or maybe even a little kropotkin ... national anarchist? wouldn't that just be what we have now - "a future of never ending enslaved civil disorder" to quote Slayer i.e. Controlled Chaos. Because that is the only non-stateless, or communist version of anarchism i can think of.
catalineas 3 years ago
the last drug-themed film i saw was Candy, with Heath Ledger. thougth it was quite good, if somewhat unsettling. you saw, slacker?
Suuper223Again 3 years ago 2
no actually.. i will see it tho, as i wanted to for some time.....
SLACKER614 3 years ago
please do. Heath was excellent, as usual.
Suuper223Again 3 years ago 2
i know i left out alot..but the class struggle is about who controls the economic surplus in society...ever since the beginning of history..*correction 'the current war against Iraq*, not Iran..editors note..slacker614 must be opiated..
SLACKER614 3 years ago
Opiates are too strong for me.
fucksatanism 3 years ago
yeah, weed, mushrooms and LSD is a better choice. i have a high tolerance for opiates..i have taken a fatal dose and survived ......it just feels so damn good....i mix them w/ alcohol, which is a very bad idea, but SLACKER614 is not a role model...lol..peace, my friend.
SLACKER614 3 years ago
Codeine + alcohol is very pleasant mix
DOPEPHILE 3 years ago
Nobama man please listen, slacker614 knows what he's missin
thegnarlynihilist 3 years ago
hahahahaahahahahahahhahaa!!!!!!
great comment..mcbush and nobama...represent the same capitalist system..
SLACKER614 3 years ago
nobama man, only stupid ass _______ are at your command!!!
SLACKER614 3 years ago