Added: 3 years ago
From: aobloch
Views: 19,872
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thermography detects heat. Heat does not inherently equal cancer. It can not in any way replace mammography. Don't delude yourself into thinking otherwise.

  • There is substantial evidence that mammograms are not accurate in detecting cancer, AND the radiation exposure increases the risk of cancer even more. Furthermore, women with dense breast tissue face two problems: 1) Excruciatingly pain --why isn't anyone talking more about this-- and 2) Confusing tests results. Cancer Prevention Coalition Chairman Samuel S. Epstein, M.D. says annual screening over 10 yrs. exposes women to at least 8 times greater radiation than FDA's "cancer risk" level.

  • where i can buy thermography?

  • @GeoGroundHoggz Not sure what you mean. Do you want to purchase a camera or have someone take thermographic photos.

  • @aobloch

    buy the camera or machine.

  • We need to take control of our health now and thermal imaging is a great way to do it. You can use full body thermal image scans, too. Use them like a roadmap you can follow to healing yourself and making changes now to avoid future medical problems. If you are in the San Diego, CA area and looking to have breast thermal imaging or full body thermal imaging, I would recommend Linda Hayes, CCT from Total Thermal Imaging. She has a few different locations, too.

  • We need to take control of our health now and thermal imaging is a great way to do it. You can use full body thermal image scans, too. Use them like a roadmap you can follow to healing yourself and making changes now to avoid future medical problems. If you are in the San Diego, CA area and looking to have breast thermal imaging or full body thermal imaging, I would recommend Linda Hayes, CCT from Total Thermal Imaging. She has a few different locations, too.

  • Why shouldn't it replace mammograms? From all I just heard, it's superior. I think they had to say that or the corporate fascist media wouldn't let them run the piece. Sick, huh?

  • well why replace it? mammography can bring in great money- it causes problems thus the so called 'solvers' of those problems can make a big buck. By hittin the tissues w/ 1000x the normal x-rays, u inherently stimulate possible malignant cells & achieve a noticable cancerous state. And we all know how cancer is a huge profit potential for pharmaceuticals & western med.

    So really why change to somethin safe & not so profitable?

  • Wow! Answer to prayer.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more