I've seen in my life a few collapsing buildings (caused by many different factors). I'm not physicist, just trying to find explanation. Steel (or aluminium) wreckage will be visible and sticky out of the collapse. Concrete pieces? Some of them should be much bigger (parts of the structure-reinforced concrete). Just take a look to buildings crushed by earthquakes, bombs, any other factor and compare the effects. I'm not guru, I don't tell You what caused the WTC effect, but instead of insult, co
well obviously that huge crater(with what appears to be dry molten rock) was not there when the tower was built, because no one would built a building on top of an empty huge crater...lol.
this is such a stupid video. Are we supposed to call our local geologists and nuclear physicists and ask them about striations? The electronic music in the background did make me want to coat the inside of my trousers with some gas station condiments and do a little jiggy though. Thank you!!!!
It is very difficult to believe untill everyone whatch the entire interview with Dimitri, no way to disprove him, this man leave no question unanswered, man, watch his interview with british reporter on some TV.Very impressive he is so acurate , wow
this sounds like misinformation.. the mossad did have everything to do with it, but they didnt use nuclear weapons.. be wary of what u come across.. everyone needs critical thinking..
@adamrosemead1 Because your coming from the understanding of a Nuclear Bomb meant to kill large amounts of people over a vast area which would require a long atmosphere time-span. What you have to understand is that an radioactive isotope has a half-life (how long it will exist that can be quite short). Isotopes can last into the Nanoseconds, but that would be enough to create an explosion. How did virtually everything get 'dustified'? Berylllium 59, some experts are claiming is involved.
@adamrosemead1 Tens of thousands have been experiencing radiation exposure symptoms...cancers, heart attacks (which most die of, heart disease and stroke). That has happened with scientists at, Chernobyl. They think they're fine, then they die within a few years. Sadly, all those exposed on 911, who have died of heart related illnesses, have not been justified. They simply don't see the association or don't understand the deadly effects of radiation during an extended period in time.
@stephen2152002 Perhaps the Waterfalls as memorials on the site will help if their is radiation. Both presidents complicit in 911 funding from the estate of me "deceased" and my co. of Zenadev were attendees at the site on 911 ten years later in 2011. The connection to Obamas lawfirm by the real mastermind of 911 is on my Website. Insilco 8K InNet Technologies to deceive the people, controlling the narrative on mainstream media. I think Rupert is an actor front like Obama hired by him. HRSiegal
@adamrosemead1 Radiation was detected, but MSM tried to chalk it up to "Medical equipment". This was not Uranium, as Plutonium can be detonated w/ much less fall out. These devices are also ten times heaver, hence not portable. That means they don't make good WEAPONS as u keep trying to define them in ur ignorance.
@adamrosemead1 The radiation detected by the Plutonium 238 (see Hiroshima for an example, 2% of it potential energy was released) was chalked up as "medical equipment". So u believe no advancements in nuke tech have been made in the past 60yrs??
I was looking for baby suffocation porn.. I guess this is "more prohibited" I like how Dimitri Khalezov is a self professed "eye-witness to the actual 9/11 conspiracy" but seems to live in Thailand and comes across as totally fake to boot!
Is this trying to say that a nuke was set off in tne basement, made "lava" like granite ( cause the granite suggests it was melted slowy) and the towers blew up from point of impact down?? Would a nuclear device actually make a melted core (same as a nuclear power plant)? Also would the rescue service and clear teams be dropping down dead in weeks if not days being exposed to so much radiation? Years after its been reported that thousands are dying and suffering from asbestosis.
ive looked at many theories and the nuke one is "far out there"! to say the least.But.......to not buid upon the twin tower site, have concrete tomb, and a constant flow of water reminds me of fukushima and attempts to keep core cool. wheres the steam though? Just thiniking out loud.
Conclusions /WTC/ - the collapse building should stop after 79 meters of fall, or- t with altered parameters/ it could fall more meters, but in this case the fall of it would last 103 secinds, not 11 seconds.
One University professor from Brno /Czech republic / Ivan Nemec with his student calculated WTC "collapse" in her diploma work. They proved the collapse should be much slower, and the pile of debris would be much higher. He is a member of AE911ForTruth. Here is an interwiew with him /in Czech/:
New investigation - with all the vidence from videos /FEMA photographer has 22hours of them in Argentina/, with Rodrigues and 14 more which witnessed the undergroud explosion... just seconds before the plane hit the building... I am not sure it was nuclear, but it was an explosion... I don´t remember how much time it takes - ?Dimitri - from the explosion to pulverize the WTC to dust... minutes? an hour? Maybe It doesn´t fit the evidence .. but I wasn´t studying hard all the videos and his book
It DID NOT "vaporize" AFTER the so call collapses.
Is everyone blind.
Start looking and thinking for yourselves.
It's obvious, the towers "vaporized" from top to bottom.
This, actually takes the weight OFF from the structure below.
What happened is obvious (200,000 tons of welded and bolted 2000 degrees certifiate steel.... "collapsed" about an hour after impacts with black smoke fires on about 6 floors ... YEAH, SURE ! BEAM ME UP SCOTTY, there is no ...)
So where is the volcanic glass formed by the high nuke temps? Where are the large fractures? All I see is normal Manhattan geology. Also video ststes "is there proof of....in the hard granite bottom of the WTC" There is NO GRANITE in ANY part of NYC's bedrock, in any borough.. It's mistakes like this, which show lack of basic research that make me doubt this theory.
Does anyone here actually know anything about the effects of a suggested 150 kt warhead? Look up the sedan crater. It was a 104 kt device placed at 100 meters (320 feet). It created a crater 390 meters across (1280 feet)!
The Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty requires that devices of less than 150 kT be declared and that none be larger than 150 kT yield. It does not require that the actual kTonnage be revealed, so long as it is less.
@TitusSviatoslav Maybe, but no one follows it. The Minuteman ICBMs carry typically three to five 400kt MIRVs on their warhead bus. Multiple small warheads do more damage than a single large one of the same total yield. (I wonder who the sicko is who developed THAT model of efficiency?)
Construction of the new WTC7 began in March 2002 - 6 Months post 911.
That means the WTC 7 site was not hot.
It's very possible that WTC 7 was a "cover -up" event designed to draw attention from the demolition of the 2 towers by nuclear demolition AND, most importantly, LAY A FRESH LAYER OF CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION DUST over the top of the largely settled tower 1&2 dust 5 hours later!
WTC 7 was the "Alibi" for the nuclear demolition of buildings 1&2. It was a brilliant ploy to distract!
The BORONATED water flowing into the Memorial Pool void hole is a perfect inverse of what happened on 911, according to Dimitri Khalezov, former Soviet Nuclear Special Services officer, who witnessed document of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty that declared "special underground nuclear demolition devices of less than 150 kT yield 50 meters below both towers and the Sears Tower.
Nuclear Crush Pyroclastic Vapor exploding out on 911 / boronated water flowing into the same void today!
@TitusSviatoslav Boron is commonly used for hardening structural elements. There were no "Pyroclastic" vapor, as it would have incinerated combustible materials in it's wake. To my knowledge, there has been NO cases of acute radiation poisoning in NY, even in those who were covered in dust from WTC 1&2.
If you want to search for trace elements from nuclear weapons, you would look for cesium-137 an isotope that does not occur naturally.
Nukes are not required for this and also too expensive.
TrueNYC sorry for disappoint you but you are totally blinded. Nuclear demolition is no theory, it is the only truth. Physics are real, you cannot close your eyes from physics.
Obvious fake story with weak theory. Targeted for uneducated people. Dimitri is not what he says he is. He is the product of "interested" group. Rigorous and thorough researchers already know what is what, who is who. This theory is not even close to for consideration. I can't believe that people fall into this without doing mere research on the subject. Tired of listening hoax fairy tale stories. A&E for 9/11 truth is the serious and only reliable source of any kind into this matter. Good Luck!
"U.S. military personnel, dedicated to protecting the United States, its people and the United States Constitution have intercepted CIA/MOSSAD nukes that were in transit from the CIA’s underground Denver base to Washington DC on August 23, 2011. The CIA/MOSSAD were transporting the nukes underground in tunnels built by the United States Air Force that connects secret underground bases throughout the United States." IS IT POSSIBLE? turbos-entertainmentDOTicDOTczSLASHseismic.htm
@Massaricossudo Mine is from Brooklyn Polytech. A colloquialism is not the same thing as a synonym. You should have stayed awake in English class. What they call it is irrelevant. Go look at the evidence for thermite before you jump on the kiddie-nuke bandwagon.
If you're really a physicist you can prove it was explosives just by the energy it took to expand the dust cloud. It is greater than the gravitational PE by a good order of magnitude. Ditto for pulverizing all the concrete.
Do u mean termite the insect did all that shit? Or r u confusing DUSTIFICATION with melting. Did u see any building MELTING on 911. R u aware that there was MOLTEN ROCK (granite) in the WTC bedrock, like PLASMA? Or r u a desinfo agent?
R u aware that the USG had to edit all dictionaries because of the Ground Zero blunder?
R u into comics?
My goodness where do people like u come from? You just LOVE war right?
@Massaricossudo That's thermite, not termite, as in Al + Fe2O3
Moltyen granite? Sorry the Manhattan bedrock is schist, there is no igneous bedrock in NYC.
Who cares if they put the term in the dictionary? Plenty of colloquialisms and slang are in it. Comics? Not since 4th grade. And who says I love war? Have you been smoking WTC dust? The demolition of those buildings was the govt's EXCUSE to go to war, and eliminate all our rights with the "patriot" act. All responsible should hang.
@Massaricossudo So, just calling it "ground zero" makes it a nuke? If they called it a pile of shit, would the wreckage be definitively made of feces too? Jeeeez.....
Ok... u r a nice guy, or gal... It really doesn't matter if it was thermite, termite, nanothermite, or NUKES, which IN MY OPINION is the ONLY plausible explanation for the 911 events... It's 100% sure that the Official Conspiracy Theory is the BIGGEST BS I hv ever heard in my life. So I agree with you.... HANG ALL RESPONSIBLE starting with PHILIP ZELICOW who had the nerve to direct the infamous 911 Commission....
@Massaricossudo I agree, and they should be hung with barbed wire, all the way up to G.Bush. Funny too how they prohibited pilots from carrying guns just ~2mos before 9/11. Seriously, check out all the independently-verified EVIDENCE at ae911truth(dot)org and 911research(dot)com
It was also "funny" how quickly all the evidence was destroyed, which is ILLEGAL for any building over 7 stories by national fire codes. Esp. since this was 1st time EVER "fire" brought down a steel building.
When it took place, I was so traumatized with 911 that I tried not to think about... but when I visited Hawaii in 2006 I met this young girl that showed me Zeitgeist, my head went through a 360 degree spin since then.... I didn't know what to believe in... I showed it to my brother, and he want to beet me up just for considering that something else took place on 911... So I started doing my homework, and the most shocking book I ever read about 911 was the 911 Widows. I recommend.
After reading the 911 Widows book, I realized that the Official Conspiracy Theory was the biggest BS I hv ever heard of. And I got depressed for over 3 months. I didn't even wanna get out of bed, I just couldn't believe that the world could be so ugly... And when I first watched Dimitri Khalezov explanation... it sounded like music to my ears... Actually my dad is the one with a PHD in Spacial Physics, I only have a masters in Linguistics, and that is why love the GROUND ZERO proof.
@Massaricossudo I'll check out the book, thanks. My education is in physics, chemistry and geology, which is why the expansion of the dust cloud & pulverization of concrete mid-air didn't sit right. The only place for real evidence is the architects, engineers and physicists at ae911truth(dot)org, and 911research(dot)com. They make a compelling case esp. with reacted and unreacted nano-thermite in ALL the dust samples, plus the EPA's finding of the binder, 1,3-diphenylpropane.
What about the cancer dying first responders.... well... all videos of the explosions, and the dust clouds shows A LOT of energy for that magic.... I am with Colonel K all the way... sorry.... just way too much energy for nanothermite... The videos r the shocking evidence.... corroborated by the definition given by the USG itself.... GROUND ZERO....
@Massaricossudo NO! Thermite just cuts the steel into sell-able sizes. The BOOM!s are HE getting the collapse process in motion (blowing the cut beams out of the way) and pulverizing the concrete during the fall. That's why it fell at free-fall speed, no resistance by energy used up "pancaking" (LOL) floors.
@TheMaggsy1 I'm not talking about ordinary welding thermite. Look up Lawrence Livermore Laboratories original research on nano-thermite, as well as the US patents on it. It works like a shaped charge to blast a high-speed jet of white hot steel and gases out the business end of the casing. Cuts steel beams in well under a second.
@Snoep76239 In April 2009, Steven E. Jones, along with Niels Harrit and 7 other authors published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, titled, 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'. [10] NIST then said that there was no "clear chain of custody" to prove that the four samples of dust came from the WTC site
@TheMaggsy1 Yeah ,but they were all from different people & locations. Too bad I didn't think to go scoop up a few pounds right after it happened. I only lived 30 min away.
@TheMaggsy1 Of course. Unless samples are bagged,tagged sealed & notarized upon collection, OcC is always a contested point. NYS just had to dismiss 1000s of DWI cases for same reason. The point is the Gov't destroyed the evidence, and we have to work with what little we have to prove they lied, well enough to get a real investigation, which will be nearly impossible to prove with all the evidence gone/metled down. The dust citizens collected is a starting point, & was from 4 different people.
@Snoep76239 The Gov't didn't destroy the evidence,some of the TT still exist, you can't expect them to keep all the rubble and steel,when a car is involved in a crime,do you think the police keep the car for ever, no they keep the relevant evidence for a set period of time.But like I say you can't prove where these dust samples came from?so it's not evidence and why won't they let others test for Nano thermite?
@Massaricossudo of course it's a public forum,what are you on about, i have never said otherwise.concerned about what?no again you are misrepresenting my position ,i do not think that Jet Fuel Blows Up steel framed concrete buildings,you are making things up.i do think though that jumbo jets crashing into the TT followed by uncontrolled fire is enough to bring down the TT.
@TheMaggsy1 Yeah, but they destroyed most of it very quickly. Also, the car analogy is apples and oranges, there are national fire investigation laws regarding buildings over 7 stories (which were broken w/the TTs), that have nothing to do with how long cops keep a car. There's plenty of storage space on the Staten Is. landfills. Who says Jones, et.al. won't let others test the dust? Plus, why so much concern for its chain of custody? Where's the physical evidence (any)of nukes?
@Snoep76239 there was no need to keep most of it.the car analogy is not apples+oranges, is the same thing only the twin towers was a much larger scale.how were the national fire investigation laws broken?well who has tested it apart from Jones?you're not bothered about chain of custody,its not hard 2 c why juries make bad decisions with ppl like you about.why are you asking me about nukes, thats not my position.
@TheMaggsy1 I do worry about CoC if it's going to trial, but the 9/11 events never will because most physical evidence is gone. There are nat'l fire invest. laws concerning bldgs over a certain size that demand a certain level of investigation in case of partial structural failure, and as WTC was the only steel bldgs to ever (supposedly) come down due to fire, the exact mechanism needed 2B determined from the evidence, not after-the fact computer. modeling. I can look up the exact law if U like
@Snoep76239 it's gone because there was no need to keep it.please look up this law,the WT7 collapse was thoroughly investigated after the report into the TT collapse, they concentrated on the TT first.
@TheMaggsy1 I will look it up. Funnt though how they came up with some "explanation" for WTC7 coming down due to some small fires. Taller steel buildings have burned out of control for 12+ hours w/o collapse, and even the other WTC buildings, 1/2 destroyed by tower debris, did not collapse. No conventionally-constructed steel building has ever in history come down due to fire. You'd think they'd want to do a serious study of the exact failure mode with evidence, not computer models.
@Snoep76239 small fires,where did u get that from?not this old chest nut again,what happened on 9/11 was unique,so its pointless trying to compare it to any other tall building fire, all the others were tackled by the fire brigade and sprinkler systems, WT7 was not.because of lack of water.big difference.the other WTC buildings were crushed ,have you seen the pics.they did a serious study, read the report.
@TheMaggsy1 I've read the lengthy official report. My point is it said WTC 7 came down because of a failure due to fire of a key structural beam, but the fact is traditional lattice-frame steel buildingds are no wholly supported by a single beam or two. If it were so thec rushed other buildings should have come down too.Look at some of the very long burning high-rise fires that have occurred, water or not when a dozen or more stories burned out of control for hours, no major structural damage.
@Snoep76239 Do you have a source for this failure of a single beam or two,thats not how I read it,more that the fire weakened the steel frame and once one part failed it brought it all down like a pack of cards or domino effect.like i keep saying you are comparing apples + oranges with other fires in buildings, they were tackled with water by the fire brigade and sprinkler systems,WT7 was not.the other buildings did not burn out of control they were tackled by the fire brigade.
@TheMaggsy1 I say "one beam" you say "one part". Fact is steel buildings don't fall like cards. Crushed other WTC buildings no fall like cards. OK so fire weakened WTC7 so it can fall like cards? Look up videos of the Shanghai CCTV building fire. No sprinklers No fire brigade inside building (maybe hosing lower floors) ENTIRE building gutted after all-night fully-involved fire. Tons of fireworks exploding inside building too. No collapse or even partial. Bldgs don't fall after failure of 1 part
@TheMaggsy1 I say "one beam" you say "one part". Fact is steel buildings don't fall like cards. Crushed other WTC buildings no fall like cards. OK so fire weakened WTC7 so it can fall like cards? Look up videos of the Shanghai CCTV building fire. No sprinklers No fire brigade inside building (maybe hosing lower floors) ENTIRE building gutted after all-night fully-involved fire. Tons of fireworks exploding inside building too. No collapse or even partial. Bldgs don't fall after failure of 1 part
@TheMaggsy1 hi Maggsy1, can you give me your opinion on why MOLTEN steel was being pulled from the twin towers THREE MONTHS LATER, keeping in mind you say that fires only "weakened" the steel. because as we all know av gas cannot turn steel to molten metal. What intense energy could do keep steel so hot for so long, your thoughts? :-)
@TheMaggsy1 "It could have been something else", YA next u will be saying sheet aluminum is a great material to shear structural steel w/. What a DU6B @SS.!.
@TheMaggsy1 Here is the point: When a B-25 hit the empire state building, it fell into the street not even penetrating the exterior wall. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR A PLANE TO FULLY PENETRATE STRUCTURAL STEEL.
@cheerdiver haha do realise how stupid u sound? i guess not.a B-25 is a smaller plan that a boeing 767.you mean like this? ye no hole there,lol.type b-25 into google images and look at the picture.u guys use double standards,the hole at the pentagon is not as big as you think should be and you think at the TT the plane should just fall to the floor, you've been watching too many cartoons dude.then u say there was no planes,lol.you really should be a comedian you are wasted on here.
@cheerdiver Talk about comparing apples to oranges. Do you have any idea how much slower and lighter a B-25 mitchell is than a 767? We're talking jet propulsion versus a prop plane. Come on. There was an airshow here in Detroit this summer and my son wondered if this B-17 that was flying over the freeway was going to crash because it was going so slow. I tried to tell him that in 1944 that wasn't slow but he found that impossible to elieve. You're comparing planes from 2 different eras.
@mima572001 Do u realize jetliners were designed to be flown ABOVE 22,000ft. It is not only harder to fly through the denser air, the turbine will cavitate preventing the power needed to reach the 500mph the brainwashed believe they can reach. When flying below 20K, turbo PROPS are used. These are modern PROP driven aircraft. U should brush up on what is possible and not, as jets are out of their element at sea level.
Speed is NOT a factor where metal strength is concerned, IT'S PHYSICS!
Besides.. there were no planes on 911. Dimitri Khalezov proved it..... using official images.... How much more stupid could by the people that believe in the OCT?
@cheerdiver HI cheerdiver, yeah i know all about bellows, actually used them in winter to help the crank the fireplace up in winter down south :-) I doubt a bellows effect would've kept steel in a molten state underground for over 3 months. I'm unsure if your comment was going down that track or not but if it is i would argue that if the bellows effect can last for 3 months then it can last for years. peace out :-)
Respond to this video... Also , maybe I confused you with someone else, but it seems that everyone on DK's "side" shoots down any non-nuke theory supporter, whereas I feel that as long as we all agree the "official" story is a load of steaming BS, we are on the same "side" and should not be flaming or arguing over which exact explosive or methods were used. If enough Americans can c inconsistencies in the Gov't story , we can demand full investigation, and worry about details and CoC later
Respond to this video... Also , maybe I confused you with someone else, but it seems that everyone on DK's "side" shoots down any non-nuke theory supporter, whereas I feel that as long as we all agree the "official" story is a load of steaming BS, we are on the same "side" and should not be flaming or arguing over which exact explosive or methods were used. If enough Americans can c inconsistencies in the Gov't story , we can demand full investigation, and worry about details and CoC later
Respond to this video... Also in this video what's so special about the rock? That it's folded and deformed? That there are smooth quartz rocks there? All it shows is ordinary Manhattan schist and some glacial till, exactly what you find in Manhattan geology.
PS There was a stream of molten iron flowing out of the corner of the north tower on one of the burning floors. Firefighters also reported molten steel in the wreckage. And there's a clip of an excavator pulling out a yellow-hot steel hunk. Even the "official" report initially mentioned sulfide-corroded steel.(a result of sulfur in a thermite mix) ae911truth(dot)org has the FACTS, not the BS, including a plausible scenario using conventional (non-nuclear) devices.
Did U hear about April Gallop? about her lawsuit against Rumsfeld, Cheyney and Myers? The judge was Bush´cousin...
She was in the Pentagon, she escaped through the debris, she says she heard two loud explosions, and does not believe that a Boeing 757 hit the building. Her son sustained a serious brain injury, and Gallop herself was knocked unconscious after the roof collapsed onto her office.
They are doing this in other areas world wide where they built Twin Towers.
They were rigging underwater near the US Bank in downtown Los Angeles. In 2005, then president Bush said the US Bank building was a terrorist target.
They must've planned to drop the US Bank onto the Los Angeles public library below the US Bank because the same satanic symbolism seen in 9/11 videos can be seen inside the LA library. They mark their targets with satanic symbols.
The "evidence" of nukes is somewhat lacking (I see *none* that support the use of nukes on 9-11)
No melted glass. No substrate turned to glass. No radiation burns on survivors
The most amazing part is that Dimitri SAYS that every President since JBL has known of Nukes under NYC -including Nixon who couldn't keep Watergate quiet but *was* able to maintain secrecy over 3 x 150 Kiloton nukes under WTC 1,2 & 7
Khalezov provides no evidence at all, that is even LESS evidence than the US administration has put out. But i have to admit that he is a stunning storyteller.
9/11 was OBVIOUSLY an inside job, but please don't fall for ridiculous theories.
"Khalezov provides no evidence at all, that is even LESS evidence than the US administration has put out. But i have to admit that he is a stunning storyteller"
I agree, maybe he has missed his vocation -he could have made a fortune penning this as a Hollywood blockbuster ;-)
"9/11 was OBVIOUSLY an inside job, but please don't fall for ridiculous theories. "
Bangkok is pretty much the scam capital of the world, right up there with shanghai and the vancouver stock exchange. Ad homenum attacks are the main part of the debate. Thermite alone just doesn't seem to answer the question. The concrete had to be instantly heated to the point where entrained moisture was turned to vapour and thus pulverizing it. Mini-nukes or dew are the only answer since conventional explosives would not do this. Thermite used along with unconventional means.
@Uncle5cary I'm sorry, but I have to reluctantly agree with you about the nuclear thingy. Did some research and found out that the Sears Tower and the World Trade Center had nuclear demolition features built into them as part of the construction. watch?v=SqSO3OeYNoA
This is where they got the stupid idea from. Project Plowshare. How novel.
@h1wayman Hard to prove, but if it were true, it would constitute what is called a "fallback position." In which case it would be just another layer of the onion to be peeled back.
@Massaricossudo It's a metaphor. Metaphors do not normally show up in the dictionary, unless they are overused to excess, like the term "floundered around." They do not constitute a new meaning of a word. They simply make an analogy without using the word "like," which would make it a simile. If I said, "The site looked like ground zero of a nuclear blast," would you not be able to wrap your brain around the fact that it isn't a new definition of the term?
@LordBalto This is why it is so difficult for the general public to take you guys seriously. There is just so much misinformation and misinterpretation that any available signal is smothered with noise, which is exactly what the bastards want.
It doesn't only LOOK like...., it actually was... Mr. Dimitri Khalezov's testimony EXPLAINS it ALL, I am starting to believe that your brain has been wrapped up with shit....
@Massaricossudo And calling me names doesn't change this equation one single iota. Dmitri's scenario rises or falls on the strength of the supposed prior demolition plan. Show me the evidence.
He is the evidence.... talk to him... Actually a VERY reliable evidence, way much more reliable than the pancake guys who certainly don't any evidence of "Pancakes", nor any Syrup around the WTC....
@Massaricossudo No. The evidence is the existence or nonexistence of a New York City or New York State regulation, and that is what it would have to be, requiring a demolition plan. Where is the regulation? When was it enacted? What department enacted it? What is the procedure for submitting the plan? And don't forget, if nuclear material were really involved, there would have to be federal oversight. Where did this material come from? Who built the device? Where?
Go figure.... I wouldn't go to NY anymore, and get sad with radioactivity up the ass.... Maybe in a Haz-Mat suit just like some of the FBI agents who knew what was REALLY going on....
Marketed muzak hype.
moongbeans 2 weeks ago
can somebody start to drill there please
kiawase 2 weeks ago
Incredibly fascinating series of videos that may actually explain 9/11. "All the world's a stage" - M
JacqueFrescoTVP 1 month ago
scray thought.US using nukes on its own population.
OPEN YOUR EYES!!!!
igivesalt 1 month ago 4
Oh people what kind of items God used to make you in the world
Nabibhr1 1 month ago
Directed Free Energy weapon. Dr. Judy Wood.
LuminosityEntangled 1 month ago in playlist Related Important Videos
LOOK AT THE FACTS PEOPLE
brizcarrillo 1 month ago
the song rocks
onthegrezinn 2 months ago
I've seen in my life a few collapsing buildings (caused by many different factors). I'm not physicist, just trying to find explanation. Steel (or aluminium) wreckage will be visible and sticky out of the collapse. Concrete pieces? Some of them should be much bigger (parts of the structure-reinforced concrete). Just take a look to buildings crushed by earthquakes, bombs, any other factor and compare the effects. I'm not guru, I don't tell You what caused the WTC effect, but instead of insult, co
TheSUPERSTASIO 2 months ago
And there are people that still believe in Santa....
Massaricossudo 2 months ago
well atleast there is some of these.
wwwdotgoogledotcom/search=hiidenkirnu
yrpajaillu 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
well obviously that huge crater(with what appears to be dry molten rock) was not there when the tower was built, because no one would built a building on top of an empty huge crater...lol.
stonebrownalien 3 months ago 4
LOL @ :40 - THAT'S a gravity driven collapse!!?! Anyone truly believing that is hopeless & helpless in this life.
CRschralper 3 months ago
this is such a stupid video. Are we supposed to call our local geologists and nuclear physicists and ask them about striations? The electronic music in the background did make me want to coat the inside of my trousers with some gas station condiments and do a little jiggy though. Thank you!!!!
davidwebly 4 months ago
It is very difficult to believe untill everyone whatch the entire interview with Dimitri, no way to disprove him, this man leave no question unanswered, man, watch his interview with british reporter on some TV.Very impressive he is so acurate , wow
Arianiuss 4 months ago
this sounds like misinformation.. the mossad did have everything to do with it, but they didnt use nuclear weapons.. be wary of what u come across.. everyone needs critical thinking..
PS: te music sounds israeli too..
wailonkok 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
911 was inside job
user17v 4 months ago
WHAT TOTAL NONSENSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
adamrosemead1 5 months ago
Really?
A nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center Towers?
Why aren't the workmen glowing and screaming in pain?
Why wasn't the intense radiation detected by any sensors?
What total CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
adamrosemead1 5 months ago
@adamrosemead1 Because your coming from the understanding of a Nuclear Bomb meant to kill large amounts of people over a vast area which would require a long atmosphere time-span. What you have to understand is that an radioactive isotope has a half-life (how long it will exist that can be quite short). Isotopes can last into the Nanoseconds, but that would be enough to create an explosion. How did virtually everything get 'dustified'? Berylllium 59, some experts are claiming is involved.
greg12145 4 months ago
@adamrosemead1 Tens of thousands have been experiencing radiation exposure symptoms...cancers, heart attacks (which most die of, heart disease and stroke). That has happened with scientists at, Chernobyl. They think they're fine, then they die within a few years. Sadly, all those exposed on 911, who have died of heart related illnesses, have not been justified. They simply don't see the association or don't understand the deadly effects of radiation during an extended period in time.
stephen2152002 4 months ago
@stephen2152002 Perhaps the Waterfalls as memorials on the site will help if their is radiation. Both presidents complicit in 911 funding from the estate of me "deceased" and my co. of Zenadev were attendees at the site on 911 ten years later in 2011. The connection to Obamas lawfirm by the real mastermind of 911 is on my Website. Insilco 8K InNet Technologies to deceive the people, controlling the narrative on mainstream media. I think Rupert is an actor front like Obama hired by him. HRSiegal
HoneySiegalSurvivor 4 months ago
@adamrosemead1 Radiation was detected, but MSM tried to chalk it up to "Medical equipment". This was not Uranium, as Plutonium can be detonated w/ much less fall out. These devices are also ten times heaver, hence not portable. That means they don't make good WEAPONS as u keep trying to define them in ur ignorance.
cheerdiver 3 months ago
@adamrosemead1 The radiation detected by the Plutonium 238 (see Hiroshima for an example, 2% of it potential energy was released) was chalked up as "medical equipment". So u believe no advancements in nuke tech have been made in the past 60yrs??
cheerdiver 2 weeks ago
Only made it to 1:30 before the stupidity alert went off. Almost 2 minutes of my life wasted.
SIGH!
LindaStevensBZ 5 months ago
I was looking for baby suffocation porn.. I guess this is "more prohibited" I like how Dimitri Khalezov is a self professed "eye-witness to the actual 9/11 conspiracy" but seems to live in Thailand and comes across as totally fake to boot!
spencexxx 5 months ago
@spencexxx Mabey you should go look up nuclear demolition. It's very real, and the concept has actually been around since the 70's.
rage1331 5 months ago
Is this trying to say that a nuke was set off in tne basement, made "lava" like granite ( cause the granite suggests it was melted slowy) and the towers blew up from point of impact down?? Would a nuclear device actually make a melted core (same as a nuclear power plant)? Also would the rescue service and clear teams be dropping down dead in weeks if not days being exposed to so much radiation? Years after its been reported that thousands are dying and suffering from asbestosis.
TRIPCITY44 5 months ago
ive looked at many theories and the nuke one is "far out there"! to say the least.But.......to not buid upon the twin tower site, have concrete tomb, and a constant flow of water reminds me of fukushima and attempts to keep core cool. wheres the steam though? Just thiniking out loud.
TRIPCITY44 5 months ago
@TRIPCITY44
Don't too much you exhale bad smell......
Let Dimitri Khlezov explain to you what happened on 911, and WHY, even after confessing the crime, is that Larry Silverstein never got arrested.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
9/11 Truth Rally - 10 Year Anniversary - New York - September 11th 2011
youtube:
watch?v=RI_yAbttINg&feature=player_embedded
9/9/11 We Are Change at the Israeli Consulate NYC
/watch?v=7OMT7TdmZ9w&feature=related
Janikaraskova 5 months ago
I don´t know if Benjamin Fulford and David Wilcock - supposed to be Edgar Cayce´s reincarnation :) are misleading/ deceiving or not.
I would like to know what do you tkink about this:
divinecosmosDOTcom/start-here/davids-blog/975-undergroundbases
Granits from Kursk are also mentioned there.
Janikaraskova 5 months ago
Conclusions /WTC/ - the collapse building should stop after 79 meters of fall, or- t with altered parameters/ it could fall more meters, but in this case the fall of it would last 103 secinds, not 11 seconds.
English abstract of diploma work:
wwwDOTreformyDOTcz/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Nemec_I_2DOTpdf
Janikaraskova 5 months ago
One University professor from Brno /Czech republic / Ivan Nemec with his student calculated WTC "collapse" in her diploma work. They proved the collapse should be much slower, and the pile of debris would be much higher. He is a member of AE911ForTruth. Here is an interwiew with him /in Czech/:
wwwDOTreformyDOTcz/zpravy/rozhovor-s-doc-ing-ivanem-nemcem-o-prvni-ceske-studii-padu-wtc-911/
They used computer simulation programmes, and differenciat equations...
Janikaraskova 5 months ago
mistakes - evidence .. underground...
Janikaraskova 5 months ago
mistakes - underground...
Janikaraskova 5 months ago
New investigation - with all the vidence from videos /FEMA photographer has 22hours of them in Argentina/, with Rodrigues and 14 more which witnessed the undergroud explosion... just seconds before the plane hit the building... I am not sure it was nuclear, but it was an explosion... I don´t remember how much time it takes - ?Dimitri - from the explosion to pulverize the WTC to dust... minutes? an hour? Maybe It doesn´t fit the evidence .. but I wasn´t studying hard all the videos and his book
Janikaraskova 5 months ago
this is the truth.period
144000V 5 months ago
It DID NOT "vaporize" AFTER the so call collapses.
Is everyone blind.
Start looking and thinking for yourselves.
It's obvious, the towers "vaporized" from top to bottom.
This, actually takes the weight OFF from the structure below.
What happened is obvious (200,000 tons of welded and bolted 2000 degrees certifiate steel.... "collapsed" about an hour after impacts with black smoke fires on about 6 floors ... YEAH, SURE ! BEAM ME UP SCOTTY, there is no ...)
911 myth is purely GROTESQUE.
MrPierrePhilippe 5 months ago
So where is the volcanic glass formed by the high nuke temps? Where are the large fractures? All I see is normal Manhattan geology. Also video ststes "is there proof of....in the hard granite bottom of the WTC" There is NO GRANITE in ANY part of NYC's bedrock, in any borough.. It's mistakes like this, which show lack of basic research that make me doubt this theory.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
most censored video on the web? but it's here for all to see, you couldn't make it up.lol
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
hmmm so was there any proof of radiation after collapse? Did anyone tested it?
Greenjah81 5 months ago
please- I NEED TO KNOW WHAT THAT SONG IS- MY LIFE IS INCOMPLETE OTHERWISE---
eduardoobregon 5 months ago 2
@eduardoobregon
watch?v=bCprxJZy-dM
checkThrice 5 months ago
@checkThrice you are an angel! this vid is the shit, thanks and keep the truth up!
eduardoobregon 5 months ago
Ponder if you must.....
SnakemanisJeff 5 months ago
Worst audio track ever?
igykalen 5 months ago
Dimitri Khalezov speaks the truth about 9/11. Watch his documentary interview and learn exactly what happened.
anthonyc31 6 months ago in playlist More videos from checkThrice
From this tragedy, GW Bush got his war! :(
star4evr9 6 months ago in playlist 911
The music really distracts from the message. I stopped listening less than a minute into it.
klforrey 6 months ago
what is the name of the track?
Riddin4Pac 6 months ago
Does anyone here actually know anything about the effects of a suggested 150 kt warhead? Look up the sedan crater. It was a 104 kt device placed at 100 meters (320 feet). It created a crater 390 meters across (1280 feet)!
ZBRMusic 6 months ago
@ZBRMusic
The Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty requires that devices of less than 150 kT be declared and that none be larger than 150 kT yield. It does not require that the actual kTonnage be revealed, so long as it is less.
The devices were far less than 150 kT yield.
TitusSviatoslav 5 months ago
@TitusSviatoslav Maybe, but no one follows it. The Minuteman ICBMs carry typically three to five 400kt MIRVs on their warhead bus. Multiple small warheads do more damage than a single large one of the same total yield. (I wonder who the sicko is who developed THAT model of efficiency?)
Snoep76239 5 months ago
wake up 2 planes and 3 buildings in freefall. just like the movies. mossad job.
Undebunkable 6 months ago
Construction of the new WTC7 began in March 2002 - 6 Months post 911.
That means the WTC 7 site was not hot.
It's very possible that WTC 7 was a "cover -up" event designed to draw attention from the demolition of the 2 towers by nuclear demolition AND, most importantly, LAY A FRESH LAYER OF CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION DUST over the top of the largely settled tower 1&2 dust 5 hours later!
WTC 7 was the "Alibi" for the nuclear demolition of buildings 1&2. It was a brilliant ploy to distract!
TitusSviatoslav 6 months ago
The BORONATED water flowing into the Memorial Pool void hole is a perfect inverse of what happened on 911, according to Dimitri Khalezov, former Soviet Nuclear Special Services officer, who witnessed document of the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty that declared "special underground nuclear demolition devices of less than 150 kT yield 50 meters below both towers and the Sears Tower.
Nuclear Crush Pyroclastic Vapor exploding out on 911 / boronated water flowing into the same void today!
TitusSviatoslav 6 months ago
@TitusSviatoslav Boron is commonly used for hardening structural elements. There were no "Pyroclastic" vapor, as it would have incinerated combustible materials in it's wake. To my knowledge, there has been NO cases of acute radiation poisoning in NY, even in those who were covered in dust from WTC 1&2.
If you want to search for trace elements from nuclear weapons, you would look for cesium-137 an isotope that does not occur naturally.
Nukes are not required for this and also too expensive.
ZBRMusic 5 months ago
@TrueNYC :
What about more than thousand people "vaporized?" No DNA found until today..
Dr. Hirsh told it to relatives... "It seems they were vaporised.."
Nanotermit doesn´t do that, does it?
So who is right? Dimiti? Judy Wood? Who?
Janikaraskova 6 months ago
TrueNYC sorry for disappoint you but you are totally blinded. Nuclear demolition is no theory, it is the only truth. Physics are real, you cannot close your eyes from physics.
greedygreedy 6 months ago
Yupp! good ole A&E, they are gonna get to the bottom of this.
Thanks for the tip !!
bbbbbzzzzz 6 months ago
Obvious fake story with weak theory. Targeted for uneducated people. Dimitri is not what he says he is. He is the product of "interested" group. Rigorous and thorough researchers already know what is what, who is who. This theory is not even close to for consideration. I can't believe that people fall into this without doing mere research on the subject. Tired of listening hoax fairy tale stories. A&E for 9/11 truth is the serious and only reliable source of any kind into this matter. Good Luck!
TrueNYC 6 months ago
what do You think about this?
It is now here /IP od this website is said to be CIA HQ/
whatdoesitmeanDOTcom
watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aVlhOAiJZ5U
Notice what it is wriiten in subtitles in the end of teh video.
Janikaraskova 6 months ago
"U.S. military personnel, dedicated to protecting the United States, its people and the United States Constitution have intercepted CIA/MOSSAD nukes that were in transit from the CIA’s underground Denver base to Washington DC on August 23, 2011. The CIA/MOSSAD were transporting the nukes underground in tunnels built by the United States Air Force that connects secret underground bases throughout the United States." IS IT POSSIBLE? turbos-entertainmentDOTicDOTczSLASHseismic.htm
Janikaraskova 6 months ago 2
@Janikaraskova
These MF just wont stop...
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
What's so "nuke melted"? I can see the original metamorphic schistose structure in the rock
Snoep76239 6 months ago
And smooth pebbled/rocks? That's glacial till form the topsoil...
Snoep76239 6 months ago
"(Hardened) Molten rock? I see lots of unmolested Manhattan Schist. I'm a geologist, so I'm not fooled.
Snoep76239 6 months ago
I hate the Gov't and love a good conspiracy theory too, but this is just retarded. Learn some basic physics.
Snoep76239 6 months ago
@Snoep76239
What about learning some basic linguistics... Ground Zero = Place of an atomic bomb explosion...
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo Try graduating high school. Referring to the WTC site is a colloquialism (you can look it up)
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Yeah... I only hv a PHD in Physics.... So u r telling me that Ground Zero is colloquialism of PANCAKE COLLAPSE.. LOL!
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo Mine is from Brooklyn Polytech. A colloquialism is not the same thing as a synonym. You should have stayed awake in English class. What they call it is irrelevant. Go look at the evidence for thermite before you jump on the kiddie-nuke bandwagon.
If you're really a physicist you can prove it was explosives just by the energy it took to expand the dust cloud. It is greater than the gravitational PE by a good order of magnitude. Ditto for pulverizing all the concrete.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Do u mean termite the insect did all that shit? Or r u confusing DUSTIFICATION with melting. Did u see any building MELTING on 911. R u aware that there was MOLTEN ROCK (granite) in the WTC bedrock, like PLASMA? Or r u a desinfo agent?
R u aware that the USG had to edit all dictionaries because of the Ground Zero blunder?
R u into comics?
My goodness where do people like u come from? You just LOVE war right?
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo That's thermite, not termite, as in Al + Fe2O3
Moltyen granite? Sorry the Manhattan bedrock is schist, there is no igneous bedrock in NYC.
Who cares if they put the term in the dictionary? Plenty of colloquialisms and slang are in it. Comics? Not since 4th grade. And who says I love war? Have you been smoking WTC dust? The demolition of those buildings was the govt's EXCUSE to go to war, and eliminate all our rights with the "patriot" act. All responsible should hang.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Thank God I didn't get close to the radioactive vapors from GROUND ZERO (place of an atomic bomb explosion).
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo So, just calling it "ground zero" makes it a nuke? If they called it a pile of shit, would the wreckage be definitively made of feces too? Jeeeez.....
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Ok... u r a nice guy, or gal... It really doesn't matter if it was thermite, termite, nanothermite, or NUKES, which IN MY OPINION is the ONLY plausible explanation for the 911 events... It's 100% sure that the Official Conspiracy Theory is the BIGGEST BS I hv ever heard in my life. So I agree with you.... HANG ALL RESPONSIBLE starting with PHILIP ZELICOW who had the nerve to direct the infamous 911 Commission....
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo I agree, and they should be hung with barbed wire, all the way up to G.Bush. Funny too how they prohibited pilots from carrying guns just ~2mos before 9/11. Seriously, check out all the independently-verified EVIDENCE at ae911truth(dot)org and 911research(dot)com
It was also "funny" how quickly all the evidence was destroyed, which is ILLEGAL for any building over 7 stories by national fire codes. Esp. since this was 1st time EVER "fire" brought down a steel building.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
When it took place, I was so traumatized with 911 that I tried not to think about... but when I visited Hawaii in 2006 I met this young girl that showed me Zeitgeist, my head went through a 360 degree spin since then.... I didn't know what to believe in... I showed it to my brother, and he want to beet me up just for considering that something else took place on 911... So I started doing my homework, and the most shocking book I ever read about 911 was the 911 Widows. I recommend.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
After reading the 911 Widows book, I realized that the Official Conspiracy Theory was the biggest BS I hv ever heard of. And I got depressed for over 3 months. I didn't even wanna get out of bed, I just couldn't believe that the world could be so ugly... And when I first watched Dimitri Khalezov explanation... it sounded like music to my ears... Actually my dad is the one with a PHD in Spacial Physics, I only have a masters in Linguistics, and that is why love the GROUND ZERO proof.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo I'll check out the book, thanks. My education is in physics, chemistry and geology, which is why the expansion of the dust cloud & pulverization of concrete mid-air didn't sit right. The only place for real evidence is the architects, engineers and physicists at ae911truth(dot)org, and 911research(dot)com. They make a compelling case esp. with reacted and unreacted nano-thermite in ALL the dust samples, plus the EPA's finding of the binder, 1,3-diphenylpropane.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
What about the cancer dying first responders.... well... all videos of the explosions, and the dust clouds shows A LOT of energy for that magic.... I am with Colonel K all the way... sorry.... just way too much energy for nanothermite... The videos r the shocking evidence.... corroborated by the definition given by the USG itself.... GROUND ZERO....
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo Thermite only cuts through the beams. Conventional hi-tech HE does the central columns.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239
Is BOOM! BOOM ! BOOM the thermite cutting sound? Does it cut into DUST?
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo NO! Thermite just cuts the steel into sell-able sizes. The BOOM!s are HE getting the collapse process in motion (blowing the cut beams out of the way) and pulverizing the concrete during the fall. That's why it fell at free-fall speed, no resistance by energy used up "pancaking" (LOL) floors.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239 thermite does not cut through beams,this has been scientifically proven.
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 I'm not talking about ordinary welding thermite. Look up Lawrence Livermore Laboratories original research on nano-thermite, as well as the US patents on it. It works like a shaped charge to blast a high-speed jet of white hot steel and gases out the business end of the casing. Cuts steel beams in well under a second.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239 In April 2009, Steven E. Jones, along with Niels Harrit and 7 other authors published a paper in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, titled, 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe'. [10] NIST then said that there was no "clear chain of custody" to prove that the four samples of dust came from the WTC site
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@Snoep76239 all the dust samples, only 4 were taken.
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 Yeah ,but they were all from different people & locations. Too bad I didn't think to go scoop up a few pounds right after it happened. I only lived 30 min away.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239 who were these ppl? as NIST said there was no clear chain of custody, would never be accepted in a court of law.
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 Of course. Unless samples are bagged,tagged sealed & notarized upon collection, OcC is always a contested point. NYS just had to dismiss 1000s of DWI cases for same reason. The point is the Gov't destroyed the evidence, and we have to work with what little we have to prove they lied, well enough to get a real investigation, which will be nearly impossible to prove with all the evidence gone/metled down. The dust citizens collected is a starting point, & was from 4 different people.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239 The Gov't didn't destroy the evidence,some of the TT still exist, you can't expect them to keep all the rubble and steel,when a car is involved in a crime,do you think the police keep the car for ever, no they keep the relevant evidence for a set period of time.But like I say you can't prove where these dust samples came from?so it's not evidence and why won't they let others test for Nano thermite?
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1
Because they are going to find a nuke... 150 kiloton nuke.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo what are you on about? this is in no way relevant to what i said,why are you replying to me if you are talking to some one else?
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1
My friend we now FREE. Dimitri Khalezov explained 911.... The truth is out of the box! LMAO.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1
As far as I know this is a public forum. Why r u so concern? Do you still believe that Jet Fuel Blows Up steel framed concrete buildings? LMAO.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Massaricossudo of course it's a public forum,what are you on about, i have never said otherwise.concerned about what?no again you are misrepresenting my position ,i do not think that Jet Fuel Blows Up steel framed concrete buildings,you are making things up.i do think though that jumbo jets crashing into the TT followed by uncontrolled fire is enough to bring down the TT.
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 Yeah, but they destroyed most of it very quickly. Also, the car analogy is apples and oranges, there are national fire investigation laws regarding buildings over 7 stories (which were broken w/the TTs), that have nothing to do with how long cops keep a car. There's plenty of storage space on the Staten Is. landfills. Who says Jones, et.al. won't let others test the dust? Plus, why so much concern for its chain of custody? Where's the physical evidence (any)of nukes?
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239 there was no need to keep most of it.the car analogy is not apples+oranges, is the same thing only the twin towers was a much larger scale.how were the national fire investigation laws broken?well who has tested it apart from Jones?you're not bothered about chain of custody,its not hard 2 c why juries make bad decisions with ppl like you about.why are you asking me about nukes, thats not my position.
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 I do worry about CoC if it's going to trial, but the 9/11 events never will because most physical evidence is gone. There are nat'l fire invest. laws concerning bldgs over a certain size that demand a certain level of investigation in case of partial structural failure, and as WTC was the only steel bldgs to ever (supposedly) come down due to fire, the exact mechanism needed 2B determined from the evidence, not after-the fact computer. modeling. I can look up the exact law if U like
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239 it's gone because there was no need to keep it.please look up this law,the WT7 collapse was thoroughly investigated after the report into the TT collapse, they concentrated on the TT first.
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 I will look it up. Funnt though how they came up with some "explanation" for WTC7 coming down due to some small fires. Taller steel buildings have burned out of control for 12+ hours w/o collapse, and even the other WTC buildings, 1/2 destroyed by tower debris, did not collapse. No conventionally-constructed steel building has ever in history come down due to fire. You'd think they'd want to do a serious study of the exact failure mode with evidence, not computer models.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Snoep76239 small fires,where did u get that from?not this old chest nut again,what happened on 9/11 was unique,so its pointless trying to compare it to any other tall building fire, all the others were tackled by the fire brigade and sprinkler systems, WT7 was not.because of lack of water.big difference.the other WTC buildings were crushed ,have you seen the pics.they did a serious study, read the report.
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 I've read the lengthy official report. My point is it said WTC 7 came down because of a failure due to fire of a key structural beam, but the fact is traditional lattice-frame steel buildingds are no wholly supported by a single beam or two. If it were so thec rushed other buildings should have come down too.Look at some of the very long burning high-rise fires that have occurred, water or not when a dozen or more stories burned out of control for hours, no major structural damage.
Snoep76239 5 months ago 7
@Snoep76239 Do you have a source for this failure of a single beam or two,thats not how I read it,more that the fire weakened the steel frame and once one part failed it brought it all down like a pack of cards or domino effect.like i keep saying you are comparing apples + oranges with other fires in buildings, they were tackled with water by the fire brigade and sprinkler systems,WT7 was not.the other buildings did not burn out of control they were tackled by the fire brigade.
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 I say "one beam" you say "one part". Fact is steel buildings don't fall like cards. Crushed other WTC buildings no fall like cards. OK so fire weakened WTC7 so it can fall like cards? Look up videos of the Shanghai CCTV building fire. No sprinklers No fire brigade inside building (maybe hosing lower floors) ENTIRE building gutted after all-night fully-involved fire. Tons of fireworks exploding inside building too. No collapse or even partial. Bldgs don't fall after failure of 1 part
Snoep76239 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheMaggsy1 I say "one beam" you say "one part". Fact is steel buildings don't fall like cards. Crushed other WTC buildings no fall like cards. OK so fire weakened WTC7 so it can fall like cards? Look up videos of the Shanghai CCTV building fire. No sprinklers No fire brigade inside building (maybe hosing lower floors) ENTIRE building gutted after all-night fully-involved fire. Tons of fireworks exploding inside building too. No collapse or even partial. Bldgs don't fall after failure of 1 part
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 hi Maggsy1, can you give me your opinion on why MOLTEN steel was being pulled from the twin towers THREE MONTHS LATER, keeping in mind you say that fires only "weakened" the steel. because as we all know av gas cannot turn steel to molten metal. What intense energy could do keep steel so hot for so long, your thoughts? :-)
stelley08 4 months ago
@stelley08 u r begging the question ,it has never been proven it was molten steel,it could have been something else.
TheMaggsy1 4 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 sorry pal, that reply is not good enough. good luck with the "official" theory :-)
stelley08 4 months ago
@stelley08 right so u think its not good enough, but don't say why,thats says it all really.
TheMaggsy1 4 months ago
@stelley08 now u know how it feels, when your reply was, "it could have been something else". thanks for elaborating on that one
stelley08 4 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 "It could have been something else", YA next u will be saying sheet aluminum is a great material to shear structural steel w/. What a DU6B @SS.!.
cheerdiver 4 months ago
@cheerdiver do u have a point? or are you just going to insult ppl like the troll you are?
TheMaggsy1 4 months ago
@TheMaggsy1 Here is the point: When a B-25 hit the empire state building, it fell into the street not even penetrating the exterior wall. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR A PLANE TO FULLY PENETRATE STRUCTURAL STEEL.
THERE WERE NO PLANES, PERIOD.!.
Complete HOAX!!
cheerdiver 4 months ago 11
@cheerdiver haha do realise how stupid u sound? i guess not.a B-25 is a smaller plan that a boeing 767.you mean like this? ye no hole there,lol.type b-25 into google images and look at the picture.u guys use double standards,the hole at the pentagon is not as big as you think should be and you think at the TT the plane should just fall to the floor, you've been watching too many cartoons dude.then u say there was no planes,lol.you really should be a comedian you are wasted on here.
TheMaggsy1 4 months ago
@cheerdiver Talk about comparing apples to oranges. Do you have any idea how much slower and lighter a B-25 mitchell is than a 767? We're talking jet propulsion versus a prop plane. Come on. There was an airshow here in Detroit this summer and my son wondered if this B-17 that was flying over the freeway was going to crash because it was going so slow. I tried to tell him that in 1944 that wasn't slow but he found that impossible to elieve. You're comparing planes from 2 different eras.
mima572001 3 months ago
@mima572001 Do u realize jetliners were designed to be flown ABOVE 22,000ft. It is not only harder to fly through the denser air, the turbine will cavitate preventing the power needed to reach the 500mph the brainwashed believe they can reach. When flying below 20K, turbo PROPS are used. These are modern PROP driven aircraft. U should brush up on what is possible and not, as jets are out of their element at sea level.
Speed is NOT a factor where metal strength is concerned, IT'S PHYSICS!
cheerdiver 3 months ago
@cheerdiver
Besides.. there were no planes on 911. Dimitri Khalezov proved it..... using official images.... How much more stupid could by the people that believe in the OCT?
Massaricossudo 3 months ago
@Massaricossudo Yep, for other who believe in planes - "septemberclues" - that video will blow your mind/
donaldmctyre 2 months ago
@cheerdiver Every 30'' was nothing but glass. The strength of steel box columns isn't on it's sides.
MrSammo1 2 months ago
@cheerdiver Spot on! Take a dead fly and hurl it against fly screen. It doesn't go through.
mujaku 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mujaku LOL
TheLagunaSunrise 2 months ago
@cheerdiver wow... you are completely dumb...
ThExLeGeNdxv2 2 weeks ago
@ThExLeGeNdxv2 Are you completely NAIVE?
Do a little research and you will see for yourself what is possible and NOT POSSIBLE!
cheerdiver 2 weeks ago
@TheMaggsy1
Did we get to a point in which truth is an insult?
Are you registered in a LOONY BIN?
Massaricossudo 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Massaricossudo roughly translated you can't give any evidence to back up your position so you start insulting me,case closed.
TheMaggsy1 3 months ago
@cheerdiver great point!
JasonVladimir 4 months ago
@stelley08 The bellows were invented by blacksmiths to get hydrocarbon fires (coal which burns hotter than kerosene) hot enough to WORK steel.
I totally agree, the "office fire", or as I like to call it "The $6 million man" theory holds no water that can be supported by physics.
cheerdiver 4 months ago
@cheerdiver HI cheerdiver, yeah i know all about bellows, actually used them in winter to help the crank the fireplace up in winter down south :-) I doubt a bellows effect would've kept steel in a molten state underground for over 3 months. I'm unsure if your comment was going down that track or not but if it is i would argue that if the bellows effect can last for 3 months then it can last for years. peace out :-)
stelley08 4 months ago
Respond to this video... Also , maybe I confused you with someone else, but it seems that everyone on DK's "side" shoots down any non-nuke theory supporter, whereas I feel that as long as we all agree the "official" story is a load of steaming BS, we are on the same "side" and should not be flaming or arguing over which exact explosive or methods were used. If enough Americans can c inconsistencies in the Gov't story , we can demand full investigation, and worry about details and CoC later
Snoep76239 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Respond to this video... Also , maybe I confused you with someone else, but it seems that everyone on DK's "side" shoots down any non-nuke theory supporter, whereas I feel that as long as we all agree the "official" story is a load of steaming BS, we are on the same "side" and should not be flaming or arguing over which exact explosive or methods were used. If enough Americans can c inconsistencies in the Gov't story , we can demand full investigation, and worry about details and CoC later
Snoep76239 5 months ago
Respond to this video... Also in this video what's so special about the rock? That it's folded and deformed? That there are smooth quartz rocks there? All it shows is ordinary Manhattan schist and some glacial till, exactly what you find in Manhattan geology.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
@Massaricossudo depressed? thats what happens when you end up believing crap.
TheMaggsy1 5 months ago
@TheMaggsy1
Or when the crap destroys the economy forcing humanity into slavery.
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
PS There was a stream of molten iron flowing out of the corner of the north tower on one of the burning floors. Firefighters also reported molten steel in the wreckage. And there's a clip of an excavator pulling out a yellow-hot steel hunk. Even the "official" report initially mentioned sulfide-corroded steel.(a result of sulfur in a thermite mix) ae911truth(dot)org has the FACTS, not the BS, including a plausible scenario using conventional (non-nuclear) devices.
Snoep76239 5 months ago
Did U hear about April Gallop? about her lawsuit against Rumsfeld, Cheyney and Myers? The judge was Bush´cousin...
She was in the Pentagon, she escaped through the debris, she says she heard two loud explosions, and does not believe that a Boeing 757 hit the building. Her son sustained a serious brain injury, and Gallop herself was knocked unconscious after the roof collapsed onto her office.
youtube watch?v=88JQL4esHFg
(This was shot for "911 Ripple Effect.")
Janikaraskova 7 months ago
@Janikaraskova
Hopefully she will appeal..
Massaricossudo 5 months ago
They are doing this in other areas world wide where they built Twin Towers.
They were rigging underwater near the US Bank in downtown Los Angeles. In 2005, then president Bush said the US Bank building was a terrorist target.
They must've planned to drop the US Bank onto the Los Angeles public library below the US Bank because the same satanic symbolism seen in 9/11 videos can be seen inside the LA library. They mark their targets with satanic symbols.
MostMagnificentOne 7 months ago
Dimitri is a delusional fantacist
The "evidence" of nukes is somewhat lacking (I see *none* that support the use of nukes on 9-11)
No melted glass. No substrate turned to glass. No radiation burns on survivors
The most amazing part is that Dimitri SAYS that every President since JBL has known of Nukes under NYC -including Nixon who couldn't keep Watergate quiet but *was* able to maintain secrecy over 3 x 150 Kiloton nukes under WTC 1,2 & 7
That is beyond the bounds of credibility IMO
bluesman979 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Khalezov provides no evidence at all, that is even LESS evidence than the US administration has put out. But i have to admit that he is a stunning storyteller.
9/11 was OBVIOUSLY an inside job, but please don't fall for ridiculous theories.
RummelsdorfLabs 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RummelsdorfLabs
"Khalezov provides no evidence at all, that is even LESS evidence than the US administration has put out. But i have to admit that he is a stunning storyteller"
I agree, maybe he has missed his vocation -he could have made a fortune penning this as a Hollywood blockbuster ;-)
"9/11 was OBVIOUSLY an inside job, but please don't fall for ridiculous theories. "
Wise words softly spoken ... (IMO of course ;-) )
Peace ...
bluesman979 7 months ago
which music track is this?
MKUltraGladio911 7 months ago
@checkThrice why was it prohibited
74pbg 7 months ago
what a bunch of BS
TimU2Cool 8 months ago
Bangkok is pretty much the scam capital of the world, right up there with shanghai and the vancouver stock exchange. Ad homenum attacks are the main part of the debate. Thermite alone just doesn't seem to answer the question. The concrete had to be instantly heated to the point where entrained moisture was turned to vapour and thus pulverizing it. Mini-nukes or dew are the only answer since conventional explosives would not do this. Thermite used along with unconventional means.
Uncle5cary 8 months ago
@Uncle5cary I'm sorry, but I have to reluctantly agree with you about the nuclear thingy. Did some research and found out that the Sears Tower and the World Trade Center had nuclear demolition features built into them as part of the construction. watch?v=SqSO3OeYNoA
This is where they got the stupid idea from. Project Plowshare. How novel.
Daddyo930 7 months ago
@h1wayman Hard to prove, but if it were true, it would constitute what is called a "fallback position." In which case it would be just another layer of the onion to be peeled back.
LordBalto 8 months ago
"Ground Zero" = The place of an ATOMIC EXPLOSION...
Massaricossudo 8 months ago
@Massaricossudo It's a metaphor.
LordBalto 8 months ago
@LordBalto
After THEY also victimized the English Language in their cover-up amending all English Dictionaries.....
Actual proof...
Massaricossudo 8 months ago
@Massaricossudo It's a metaphor. Metaphors do not normally show up in the dictionary, unless they are overused to excess, like the term "floundered around." They do not constitute a new meaning of a word. They simply make an analogy without using the word "like," which would make it a simile. If I said, "The site looked like ground zero of a nuclear blast," would you not be able to wrap your brain around the fact that it isn't a new definition of the term?
LordBalto 8 months ago
@LordBalto This is why it is so difficult for the general public to take you guys seriously. There is just so much misinformation and misinterpretation that any available signal is smothered with noise, which is exactly what the bastards want.
LordBalto 8 months ago
@LordBalto
It doesn't only LOOK like...., it actually was... Mr. Dimitri Khalezov's testimony EXPLAINS it ALL, I am starting to believe that your brain has been wrapped up with shit....
Massaricossudo 8 months ago
@Massaricossudo Look Einstein, there are 3 possibilities, 2 of which destroy Dmitri's argument and 1 of which supports it:
1) There is no such requirement that a demolition plan be in place=Dmitri wrong
2) There is such a requirement but it is available to the public and it isn't nuclear=Dmitri wrong
3) There is, but it is either secret or unavailable for another reason=Dmitri may be right
What is the evidence? Why hasn't Dmitri investigated this? Why haven't you?
LordBalto 8 months ago
@Massaricossudo And calling me names doesn't change this equation one single iota. Dmitri's scenario rises or falls on the strength of the supposed prior demolition plan. Show me the evidence.
LordBalto 8 months ago
@LordBalto
He is the evidence.... talk to him... Actually a VERY reliable evidence, way much more reliable than the pancake guys who certainly don't any evidence of "Pancakes", nor any Syrup around the WTC....
Massaricossudo 8 months ago
@Massaricossudo No. The evidence is the existence or nonexistence of a New York City or New York State regulation, and that is what it would have to be, requiring a demolition plan. Where is the regulation? When was it enacted? What department enacted it? What is the procedure for submitting the plan? And don't forget, if nuclear material were really involved, there would have to be federal oversight. Where did this material come from? Who built the device? Where?
LordBalto 8 months ago
@LordBalto
Go figure.... I wouldn't go to NY anymore, and get sad with radioactivity up the ass.... Maybe in a Haz-Mat suit just like some of the FBI agents who knew what was REALLY going on....
Massaricossudo 8 months ago
@LordBalto
After THEY also victimized the English Language in their cover-up amending all English Dictionaries.....
Actual proof...
Massaricossudo 8 months ago
What do pictures of the bedrock below and groundwater have to do with anything? Friggin dumbasses...
msova68 8 months ago
A nuclear device did the 911 inside job...
Massaricossudo 8 months ago