flame thrower? it's an mobile rocket launcher with "optional" thermobaric warheads..but among the russians everything falls apart, so it's no danger for us xD
u don't get it. afghanistan is a populous nation. without using area-wide-nukes nothing that is done with bombs and bullets has a lasting effect. humans breed and reproduce very fast and when they are threatened, it increases breeding rate. without resorting to Biblical methods that are Beyond Nanking.... war changes nothing and only enriches the Merchants of Death.. the arms dealers...
And the Afghans kicked your ass with all these weapons? Lol and the same Afghans who were called the freedom fighters AKA mujahideen by the US when they were fighting russians are now called terorists because they are fighting the US? Politics is interesting!
@HENZEK1 Yes you are quite right, but many mujahideen also fought alongside taliban, In fact their supream leader Mullah Omar fought against russian, in case you didnt know he changed his Surname to Mujahid (Freedom fighter). Mullah Rockete is another famous Mujahid amongst taliban, Mullah Dadullah, borjan, Turabi. The fact of the matter is, 90 percent senior talibans were former Mujaheedins fighting the russians. During the 80s these so called badies were called freedom fighters.
I am astounded by the ability of killing of a human being .... is a true strategist of destruction ... I wonder why there is so much study arms to new wars, and there is instead the study of methods of pacification between peoples .. the man is a child unconscious with toys too dangerous for its maturity.
On December 24 at 8:00 in the morning, a young 14 year old boy by the name of Scott Johnson was found dead. Doctors couldn't come up with the cause of his death. His mother checked his emails to see if she could figure out what happened. Turns out he was still signed into myspace. She found he had gone to sleep after he read and didn't repost a chain letter. If you don't repost this to six videos a girl with no face will kill you tonight. Sorry don't want to die..
Been there done that. United States MLRS baby - Steel Rain! And they aren't "running away". It's called "shoot and scoot". You have to get away because the counter-fire will be on the way to your position.
Actually it's the same story with american MLRS or any other rocket artillery- all shells exposed and they can be destroyed with an intermediate or rifle bullet.
@ThePoorShogun If only we had some type of simulator of some sort to operate on a console, and widely distribute that simulator to the world for further feedback....hmm..
@Deathtogreece2 A single incendiary bullet any where the shells would cause them to explode and it would be a bad day for the other vehicles next to them...
@Deathtogreece2 Deathtoyourmotherwhosucks why you hatin Greece so much..Come oooonn..Its ok,we will get fucked in the ass by many more in the future..Dont go hating nations cause they fucked your ass hard...Next time we will be gentle..:)))
@MrShaqiiii It's not the main MLRS in Russian arsenal, it's a very specific weapon that serves it's specific purpose. It's not even a part of artillery units, RCBP (Radioactive/Chemical/Biologocal Protection) Troops are using it instead.
@dareapa1 You can't hit with it directly into cave entrance. There wasn't much "standard" fighting, more often it was ambushes. And such "Buratinos" wasn't as common as AK. Need to say more? Of course such weapon is not much help in Afghan war. Vacuum bombs and such RPG's on other hand... leaving nothin' alive%) What about USA? Satellite guided weapons is much of help?))) Like shooting a sparrows with a cannon, idiot))
So basically, not a flame thrower, and it's redundant technology. It blankets nearby friendly forces in thick smoke, projectile technology is at least 30 years old and has practically no armour?
@Galayman2 It would be a rocket launcher. The things the Buratino fires are unguided, AFAIK. It's called a flamethrower because it projects temperature-based ammo, such as thermobaric rockets, to clear structures instead of destroying them. All that fire? just fireworks. TOS-1 and TOS-1A were intended to combat infantry and lightly armored vehicles, not Abrams or Merkavas.
@Iggysolus It is better to remember as you attacked iraq, vietnam, putting on the war in the East under the guise of democracy, who's next? Iran? and the bus just old and useless, but you want to see the Russian aggressors, but it's not true. Aggressors the 21st century is the USA!
@Cerberus221 the comment about the armor relates to the launcher not the tank beneath. I suppose the launcher can be replaced quickly and inexpensively. This is the successor to the early Katyusha BM-13.
Nah, it's OK strategy, especially if you are located from your foe 8 kilometers away and if you can unleash on your foe bunch of highly combustible and explosive shells.
This particular rocket artillery system is not supposed to have any defense. Because it is still considered artillery, i mean it supports regular artillery with it's rocket technology. And the whole STRATEGY in artillery is to bomb your foe, then relocate and get more ammo 2 bomb again ;)
LOL. It also provides a lot of cover for the firing vehicle, effectively covering it in dust and smoke :) I guess smokeless technology is still not in Russia :) LOL
Did... did that guy just say that the entire thing can be disabled or destroyed by a GUN? That it's armour is horribly weak? And that if hit in the wrong spot, it can trigger the entire payload to launch randomly? Oh man, that's frightening. Makes it sound like if it hits a bump on the road that it wipes out a nearby village for no reason.
@plplplplomg See, that's what they blame on 'insurgents' these days. Don't exactly want the world to know one of your own defense weapons screws up that badly. Think about that next time you hear about 'rebels wiping out a town' somewhere in lower russia or whatever. *chuckles*
As he describes at the end, it has a major weakness. Sounds like there is no armor on the missile section. Couple of rounds hit that and the whole thing blows up. Not good engineering. Like one of the early Soviet armored personnel carriers... They designed it to be low slung so it wasn't an easy target. But that meant the rear door was the fuel tank. Which meant that if an enemy could wait for it to pass and hit the rear, the tank exploded and the troops inside were cooked .
@SouthernCross33 Well, I could say they sucked... it it makes you feel better, but who knows, poor leadership or bad politics... I just never seen Russia as a power house country that can dominate anything since the cold war ended.
@oknatora Why would that make me feel better? I just want to know why and how the Russians lost in Afghanistan. They could've used all sorts of weapons systems there, anything from nukes,standard military and even bio weapons,or a combination of all, yet they didn't. This is what i'd like to know
@SouthernCross33 It was sarcasm, cause you wouldn't feel better. Why doesn't every country use nukes and bio weapons? It devastates countries and they are to powerful. If a country uses it, that would end the world since everyone would use it in retaliation. Main reason we keep them is to make sure no one else uses them and in case another force, I.E. Aliens come. Russia has been useless since the Cold War, that's the side effects of what it did to them.
@SouthernCross33 again have you search about charlie nesbitt wilson? that is relating to your big question of why the russian lost in Afghanistan rather than your ego about your own nickname.
The mountain range of Afghanistan requires heli-gunship support which was neutralized by stinger missiles. How can the mujaheed gets stingers? GO and READ about charles wilson.
@deestilo I know about stingers etc and who gave them to them but still that doesn't answer the question. Ego about my own nickname???? It's not my nickname it's the star constellation on our flag
@oknatora Just like IE M2 Bradley. So, Bradley is useless, you say? M1A1 once was destroyed after frendly fire from other M1A1 M2 Browning-it hit the secondary power source and tank was set up on fire. Does that make M1A1 useless?
@SouthernCross33 seriously? you bore the name of southern cross. Well if you indeed do not know why, go ahead and browse the name of Texan "charlie nesbitt wilson" and you'll see why Russian lost the war in Afghanistan.
@deestilo "i bore the name of southern cross" wtf does this mean? Do you know what the Southern Cross is and why i use it as a username? Explain what you mean with this comment of yours, it seems a bit strange, even out of context
@kawsihen With 1 aircraft carrier. 3 Su Pak stealth fighters. 26 KA50/52 attack helicopters. 1 Typhoon ballistic missile submarine.The Russian people will prove they are a "super power" when they reject Vladimir Putin's attempt to be re-elected President (for life) of Russia. Приятного дня!
@jafabian37 Everything has weaknesses. One missile will take out nearly any device or piece of equipment in the world. If you listen to the guy he says they are supported by tanks and move positions after firing.
@F4Wildcat damn that was supposed to be funny not serius your comment was the SHITTIEST ever because you werent able to understand an ironic joke -.-...
flame thrower? it's an mobile rocket launcher with "optional" thermobaric warheads..but among the russians everything falls apart, so it's no danger for us xD
LegionCWAM 1 hour ago
Rocket artillery, aww yeah.
wolfy9005 2 hours ago
Every time you help a group gain political power, there's always the chance they will turn bad.
Check out Egypt, for example. Happy 1 year's anniversary, fellas.
Sweet rocket launcher car :)
mrkazman 1 day ago
You know the us has something like that. but wait heres the best part... Its way better The MLRS take the time to check that one out.
TheBowendonald 2 days ago
Those r badass
Bigmatt7771 3 days ago
Comes in every russian happy meal!
6mmTVDeutschland 3 days ago
well thats it, we are going to lose ww3
AndersonFamily12 4 days ago
Незаменимая вещь в походе!
YppolitKorrektny 5 days ago
@YppolitKorrektny Ага! Прикурить, или костерок развести...
vovanprim 2 days ago
Can be destroyed by a GUN?!
frimodig 5 days ago
@frimodig nope
TheAleks1859 5 days ago
Dear Santa.
Aceheroic 6 days ago 5
TOS-1 Burrito
TOOHOOAH 1 week ago 5
Flame thrower ???
Russians love multi barrelled systems btw
vakasim 1 week ago
The system has weak armor and be destroyed by a gun? Hmmm?
Lamegameful 1 week ago
So was this thing based of the Geonosis Hellfire tanks in Star Wars? Or were they based on this? Because I can' tell. o
mastermalpass 1 week ago
u don't get it. afghanistan is a populous nation. without using area-wide-nukes nothing that is done with bombs and bullets has a lasting effect. humans breed and reproduce very fast and when they are threatened, it increases breeding rate. without resorting to Biblical methods that are Beyond Nanking.... war changes nothing and only enriches the Merchants of Death.. the arms dealers...
BoudicaSlade 1 week ago
mother God!!!
boosturtalent 1 week ago
And the Afghans kicked your ass with all these weapons? Lol and the same Afghans who were called the freedom fighters AKA mujahideen by the US when they were fighting russians are now called terorists because they are fighting the US? Politics is interesting!
AF6H4N1ST4N 1 week ago 53
@AF6H4N1ST4N mujahideen and taliban are two different things many old mujahideen figth againt taliban in in the afgan national army.
HENZEK1 5 days ago
@HENZEK1 Yes you are quite right, but many mujahideen also fought alongside taliban, In fact their supream leader Mullah Omar fought against russian, in case you didnt know he changed his Surname to Mujahid (Freedom fighter). Mullah Rockete is another famous Mujahid amongst taliban, Mullah Dadullah, borjan, Turabi. The fact of the matter is, 90 percent senior talibans were former Mujaheedins fighting the russians. During the 80s these so called badies were called freedom fighters.
AF6H4N1ST4N 2 days ago
I am astounded by the ability of killing of a human being .... is a true strategist of destruction ... I wonder why there is so much study arms to new wars, and there is instead the study of methods of pacification between peoples .. the man is a child unconscious with toys too dangerous for its maturity.
seby90ful 1 week ago
@seby90ful
If you don't like weapons, don't watch videos about weapons.
TheSonorama21 1 week ago
@TheSonorama21 you're right, it does not look a lot, beyond this, I just wanted to give my opinion, that's all, bye.
seby90ful 1 week ago
dear santa
clsteele 1 week ago
The ground version of an AC-130=D
SuperFriik 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dear santa.......
rhombai 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dear santa.......
rhombai 1 week ago
Aaaaand that's why there are A-10s... Now go the fuck to sleep.
Carbide195 1 week ago
Ready for some BBQ?
Madowstone 2 weeks ago
72 senators were watching this video
IceZeneo 2 weeks ago 2
lol the modern Katjuscha
icedlive 2 weeks ago
72 terrorist virgins have watched the video
NITECOREPD 2 weeks ago
24 charges were not hot enough, so they used 30, and now it it finally cool.
icecage001 2 weeks ago
In Russia the gun firing from you
sergeant5027 2 weeks ago
i only hear Burrito
Streuselsturm 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
On December 24 at 8:00 in the morning, a young 14 year old boy by the name of Scott Johnson was found dead. Doctors couldn't come up with the cause of his death. His mother checked his emails to see if she could figure out what happened. Turns out he was still signed into myspace. She found he had gone to sleep after he read and didn't repost a chain letter. If you don't repost this to six videos a girl with no face will kill you tonight. Sorry don't want to die..
tabbysawesome 2 weeks ago
in soviet russia thats how we turn on a lightbulb
MrChriss820 2 weeks ago
BTW "Buratino" is the name for the russian equivalent of "Pinocchio", fyi.
TheStraightThinker 2 weeks ago
Been there done that. United States MLRS baby - Steel Rain! And they aren't "running away". It's called "shoot and scoot". You have to get away because the counter-fire will be on the way to your position.
Steinbacker4001 2 weeks ago
Head of "Foreign Economic Activity". Developing Syria Iran and Chechnya today!
mcleanartists 2 weeks ago
This thing is mean man. Too bad they can't reload on the spot.
pathell234 2 weeks ago
In Soviet Russia, fire lights you.
runpatrickrunxc 2 weeks ago
In Russia there's a cartoon character that has the same name actually.
69IceFlame69 2 weeks ago
Red Allert :D
YeretiKk 2 weeks ago
Russia fuck
groznyize 2 weeks ago
Ну че вы тут спорите?скоро вашей Америке кирдык придет!
ZOkopeek 2 weeks ago 3
So they run away right after they attack?
TheVoiceTalk 2 weeks ago
@TheVoiceTalk Yes, like any other mobile artillery system in existance.
shivanphoenix 2 weeks ago
look like katyosha
usukker 3 weeks ago
Actually it's the same story with american MLRS or any other rocket artillery- all shells exposed and they can be destroyed with an intermediate or rifle bullet.
EsuDalyvis 3 weeks ago
war >.>
why dont governments just pick their best counter strike teams and let them play a competetive game against each other to determinate who wins
ThePoorShogun 3 weeks ago
@ThePoorShogun If only we had some type of simulator of some sort to operate on a console, and widely distribute that simulator to the world for further feedback....hmm..
jhalo113 3 weeks ago
Hate to be camping in that field...
BmccaMusic 3 weeks ago
Did he just say it might start shooting itself?!?!
iHaaZaRdz 3 weeks ago
Buratino from the root word "burat" lol
neodelphi 3 weeks ago
"Soviet troops in iraq" stupid shit commentator!!!
TheSpliffKing 3 weeks ago
@TheSpliffKing Afghanistan he said, And the soviet was in afghanistan.
Geatest 3 weeks ago
нашли как назвать "тяжёлый огнемёт":)
Вакуумные напалмовые боеприпасы и все...
Aleksandrashaylov 3 weeks ago
so if you got a sniper rifle and shoot one of the shells basically they are fucked
Deathtogreece2 3 weeks ago 34
@Deathtogreece2 A single incendiary bullet any where the shells would cause them to explode and it would be a bad day for the other vehicles next to them...
redfirekla 1 week ago
@Deathtogreece2 Not if they fuck you from 20 Kilometres when your ass is wet in bed first.
Bah ! jk
But true
SZ9000 12 hours ago
All that fire power and still the russians got their asses handed to them in Afghanistan and Chechenia Twice heee
Deathtogreece2 3 weeks ago
@Deathtogreece2 Deathtoyourmotherwhosucks why you hatin Greece so much..Come oooonn..Its ok,we will get fucked in the ass by many more in the future..Dont go hating nations cause they fucked your ass hard...Next time we will be gentle..:)))
Deathunder 6 hours ago
Range 8 KM ?? WTF every artillerie eat this to breakfast.
I think its russian Propaganda
MrShaqiiii 3 weeks ago
@MrShaqiiii It's not the main MLRS in Russian arsenal, it's a very specific weapon that serves it's specific purpose. It's not even a part of artillery units, RCBP (Radioactive/Chemical/Biologocal Protection) Troops are using it instead.
Kniazz 3 weeks ago
M1 Abrams
vdubkingvincent 3 weeks ago
Америкосы пидары конченые
DohtorYori 4 weeks ago
Russian Weapon, FUCK YEAH =D
Steam1aLgears 4 weeks ago
Where can i buy that thing?
nicopetra1 4 weeks ago
@nicopetra1
umm...u cant
lotoflol1 4 weeks ago
wtf.they got such advanced weapons still they cant scratch taliban's ass
TheEquinox007 4 weeks ago
"it was used by soviet troops in Afghanistan" yeah, didn't help them much...
dareapa1 4 weeks ago
@dareapa1 You can't hit with it directly into cave entrance. There wasn't much "standard" fighting, more often it was ambushes. And such "Buratinos" wasn't as common as AK. Need to say more? Of course such weapon is not much help in Afghan war. Vacuum bombs and such RPG's on other hand... leaving nothin' alive%) What about USA? Satellite guided weapons is much of help?))) Like shooting a sparrows with a cannon, idiot))
KurtfonKoh 4 weeks ago
I hope the US Army has a counter for that.
isukaman 1 month ago
@isukaman "It can be destroyed by a grenade, gun, or anti-tank rocket."
dpenn89 4 weeks ago
@dpenn89 Hopefully before it can fire.
isukaman 4 weeks ago
Buratino is famous fairy tale character. Familiar to Pinokio.
olologka 1 month ago
Its a goddamn rocket launcher not a flame thrower.
sirbrutal 1 month ago
Guerilla Tactic (modern version)
OpticChaos101 1 month ago
So basically, not a flame thrower, and it's redundant technology. It blankets nearby friendly forces in thick smoke, projectile technology is at least 30 years old and has practically no armour?
Wow....
TheLordSod 1 month ago
@TheLordSod yeah, except it's a 9-inch thermobaric bomb launcher. Read up on thermobaric/fuel-air munitions.
ayebraine 2 weeks ago
WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?
Bombreaker3 1 month ago
definately not a good bbq grill
SpicyHam 1 month ago
In Russia theres a lemonade that has the same name
KotatkoVonDrapek 1 month ago 101
@KotatkoVonDrapek
Buratino is a kind of russian counterpart (or copy if you will) of Pinoccio.
Kind of strange to name a flame thrower "Pinoccio", isn't it?
SEThatered 3 weeks ago
@SEThatered Yeah, kindda strange name for weapon. Maybe it's because of missiles it's fires? You know, like the nose of wood kid... ))
KurtfonKoh 3 weeks ago
@KotatkoVonDrapek COMBUSTIBLE LEMON
FpRiAlNiK 2 weeks ago
@KotatkoVonDrapek and cartoon for children and fairy tale the same name
SvgShooteR 2 weeks ago 2
@KotatkoVonDrapek Buratino = Pinoccio, the story tale about wooden boy called Buratino. Dont know who can call the artillery system by this name =\
kernelMriN 1 week ago
:)
NUKEDISM 1 month ago
glad to know everybody is happy with the new happy meal toy!
ThePresD 1 month ago
Comment removed
CTsebas 1 month ago
burito!!!!!
biome8 1 month ago
que lindo que esta este videoo....
TheDanisa777 1 month ago
theres a sign on the hatch that says, "no smoking"
PyR0Star 1 month ago 60
One question: Shouldn't' that thing be called a missile thrower instead of a flame thrower?
Galayman2 1 month ago
@Galayman2 It would be a rocket launcher. The things the Buratino fires are unguided, AFAIK. It's called a flamethrower because it projects temperature-based ammo, such as thermobaric rockets, to clear structures instead of destroying them. All that fire? just fireworks. TOS-1 and TOS-1A were intended to combat infantry and lightly armored vehicles, not Abrams or Merkavas.
I hope that answers your question.
MrAzkhare 1 month ago
Only the Russians would test a thermobarric MLRS on a civilian bus.
Iggysolus 1 month ago
@Iggysolus It is better to remember as you attacked iraq, vietnam, putting on the war in the East under the guise of democracy, who's next? Iran? and the bus just old and useless, but you want to see the Russian aggressors, but it's not true. Aggressors the 21st century is the USA!
Gangstersev 1 month ago
@Iggysolus да на гражданских американских автобусах. ;)
xMotoKx 1 month ago
@xMotoKx I laughed, like, hard xD
Iggysolus 1 month ago
@Iggysolus Such a system is better to burn out the monkeys in Iraq, Afghanistan and Chechnya.
Такой системой лучше выжигать обезьян в Ираке, Афганистане, Чечне.
xMotoKx 1 month ago
Can be destroyed by a grenade launcher? OK fair enough. But a gun/pistol?! Soviets must have hoped the Yanks only had super soakers or slingshots....
Cerberus221 1 month ago
@Cerberus221 well, it also have a range of 8km.
Not many guns thats gonna hit their targets from that range, let alone shooters.
carazide 1 month ago
@Cerberus221 No for yanks we had nuclear submarines and nuclear missiles in space. Buratino probably should burn the Europe. :)
zelibober 1 month ago
@Cerberus221 the comment about the armor relates to the launcher not the tank beneath. I suppose the launcher can be replaced quickly and inexpensively. This is the successor to the early Katyusha BM-13.
0MoTheG 1 month ago
@0MoTheG
Smerch, Uragan and Grad is successors of Katyusha
TOS1 successor of German SdKfz 251 RAK with short range 320mm incendiary rocket launcher
thxLoLz 1 month ago
So much firepower, and shit defense, not a good strategy
darrennelson18 1 month ago
@darrennelson18
Nah, it's OK strategy, especially if you are located from your foe 8 kilometers away and if you can unleash on your foe bunch of highly combustible and explosive shells.
This particular rocket artillery system is not supposed to have any defense. Because it is still considered artillery, i mean it supports regular artillery with it's rocket technology. And the whole STRATEGY in artillery is to bomb your foe, then relocate and get more ammo 2 bomb again ;)
lexxx666777 1 month ago
RUSSIANS <3
ANGEL99638 1 month ago
I like how the film is sped-up when they go in reverse. The wind sure picked up on that grass
theekrusher 1 month ago
@theekrusher lol, yeah! :P
carazide 1 month ago
haha and people say we wouldnt survive a zombie apocalypse
9nnic5 1 month ago
DEAR SANTA...
jmullins1212 1 month ago
Burrito Launcher... mmmm
FlyingSujin67 1 month ago
Santa: what can i get you for christmas young lad?
Me: ohhh a Tos-1heavy flame thrower!
Santa: hahaha your funny!
Me: ...
Santa: haha
Me: im not laughing...
Santa: what do you want?
Me: i already told you!!!
Santa: what would you do with it...
Me: well if you dont get it for me and i have to find one...well i plane on blowing you up :D
TheChambr 1 month ago
@TheChambr FAG.
oAkimboDutchiesX 1 month ago
as well as fucking squander USA Vietnam as well and we lost to afghanistan! one and one
fucking assholes!!!!
N84Skorpio 1 month ago
LOL. It also provides a lot of cover for the firing vehicle, effectively covering it in dust and smoke :) I guess smokeless technology is still not in Russia :) LOL
kint909 1 month ago
Did... did that guy just say that the entire thing can be disabled or destroyed by a GUN? That it's armour is horribly weak? And that if hit in the wrong spot, it can trigger the entire payload to launch randomly? Oh man, that's frightening. Makes it sound like if it hits a bump on the road that it wipes out a nearby village for no reason.
Kalebfenoir 1 month ago
@Kalebfenoir You are right, and make a step forward in the reasoning: can you spell JAVELIN ?
kint909 1 month ago
@Kalebfenoir lol :DDDDDD good one xD
Guitarnoob99 1 month ago
@Kalebfenoir if that would be the case there would be no russian villages by now
plplplplomg 1 month ago
@plplplplomg See, that's what they blame on 'insurgents' these days. Don't exactly want the world to know one of your own defense weapons screws up that badly. Think about that next time you hear about 'rebels wiping out a town' somewhere in lower russia or whatever. *chuckles*
Kalebfenoir 1 month ago
Chuck Norris called.....he wants his toys back....
TheMrTheee 1 month ago
@TheMrTheee your a fag
OwnYouAnyDay247 1 month ago
i have that in RUSE
zbriu 1 month ago
сунул, вынул, убежал
Shpiyon1 1 month ago
i read burrito when i glanced at it...
jimbo80982 1 month ago
My dad made this one but I made the abrams that is better
usnavysss 1 month ago
As he describes at the end, it has a major weakness. Sounds like there is no armor on the missile section. Couple of rounds hit that and the whole thing blows up. Not good engineering. Like one of the early Soviet armored personnel carriers... They designed it to be low slung so it wasn't an easy target. But that meant the rear door was the fuel tank. Which meant that if an enemy could wait for it to pass and hit the rear, the tank exploded and the troops inside were cooked .
goodtimebob 1 month ago
buratino - the same in russian like pinnocio !)))
ackarpov81 1 month ago
In Russia Flame throw you !!!
NewAnarchy88 1 month ago
1,177,717
azsxdc2029 1 month ago
I thought it said burrito at first :L
7411y 1 month ago
I got no idea how the Russians didn't win in Afghanistan
SouthernCross33 1 month ago
@SouthernCross33 Cause they just said, it can be easily destroyed or misfire when hit.. that's a pretty useless weapon.
oknatora 1 month ago
@oknatora What, thats the reason the Russians lost in Afghanistan? I doubt that very much, it wasn't the only weapons system the Russians had
SouthernCross33 1 month ago
@SouthernCross33 Well, I could say they sucked... it it makes you feel better, but who knows, poor leadership or bad politics... I just never seen Russia as a power house country that can dominate anything since the cold war ended.
oknatora 1 month ago
@oknatora Why would that make me feel better? I just want to know why and how the Russians lost in Afghanistan. They could've used all sorts of weapons systems there, anything from nukes,standard military and even bio weapons,or a combination of all, yet they didn't. This is what i'd like to know
SouthernCross33 1 month ago
@SouthernCross33 It was sarcasm, cause you wouldn't feel better. Why doesn't every country use nukes and bio weapons? It devastates countries and they are to powerful. If a country uses it, that would end the world since everyone would use it in retaliation. Main reason we keep them is to make sure no one else uses them and in case another force, I.E. Aliens come. Russia has been useless since the Cold War, that's the side effects of what it did to them.
oknatora 1 month ago
@SouthernCross33 again have you search about charlie nesbitt wilson? that is relating to your big question of why the russian lost in Afghanistan rather than your ego about your own nickname.
The mountain range of Afghanistan requires heli-gunship support which was neutralized by stinger missiles. How can the mujaheed gets stingers? GO and READ about charles wilson.
deestilo 1 month ago
@deestilo I know about stingers etc and who gave them to them but still that doesn't answer the question. Ego about my own nickname???? It's not my nickname it's the star constellation on our flag
SouthernCross33 1 month ago
@oknatora Just like IE M2 Bradley. So, Bradley is useless, you say? M1A1 once was destroyed after frendly fire from other M1A1 M2 Browning-it hit the secondary power source and tank was set up on fire. Does that make M1A1 useless?
TheVolDeMaRR 1 month ago
@TheVolDeMaRR Sure.
oknatora 1 month ago
@SouthernCross33 seriously? you bore the name of southern cross. Well if you indeed do not know why, go ahead and browse the name of Texan "charlie nesbitt wilson" and you'll see why Russian lost the war in Afghanistan.
deestilo 1 month ago
@deestilo "i bore the name of southern cross" wtf does this mean? Do you know what the Southern Cross is and why i use it as a username? Explain what you mean with this comment of yours, it seems a bit strange, even out of context
SouthernCross33 1 month ago
@SouthernCross33 You will see how when US will leave Afghanistan with same results like SU did. Wait 3-4 years max.
TheVolDeMaRR 1 month ago
@TheVolDeMaRR We've been there since 2001, I'll let you do the math.
BadBunnyRides 1 month ago
and the FPS Russia guy steps out...
iliketrains0pwned 1 month ago
Vladimir Putin's first car.
Boxanadu 1 month ago
Russia is a Supper power again
kawsihen 1 month ago
@kawsihen With 1 aircraft carrier. 3 Su Pak stealth fighters. 26 KA50/52 attack helicopters. 1 Typhoon ballistic missile submarine.The Russian people will prove they are a "super power" when they reject Vladimir Putin's attempt to be re-elected President (for life) of Russia. Приятного дня!
THEORIGINALEXSCAPER 1 month ago
lol 1 hit with a 50 cal and it's fucked
kensei85 1 month ago
@kensei85 yea cuz hiting at 6km with .50 its easy ,this aint made for direct combat you jsut shoot behind a hill then move
IWANAROCKYEEEAAAA 1 month ago
completed rusland tecnologie
Patlicankizartma 1 month ago
if hit with a grenade it will start shooting by itself? talk about a massive weakness!
jafabian37 1 month ago
@jafabian37 Everything has weaknesses. One missile will take out nearly any device or piece of equipment in the world. If you listen to the guy he says they are supported by tanks and move positions after firing.
frogjezz 1 month ago
Its like an MLRS on steroids!
Wingless117 1 month ago
@Wingless117
:)
ytonline33 1 month ago
he say.......And where Malvina Artemon, Pierre Duremar, Carabas, Papa Carlo? Disorder. URGENT invent and demonstrate.
????????
pogsboo 1 month ago
Dear santa ...
Kide21deki 1 month ago
NOW IN EVERY RUSSIAN HAPPY MEAL^^!!!
chicagokabel 1 month ago 120
@chicagokabel i found one in my cornflakes :O
LosAngeles234 1 month ago
@chicagokabel you know this is the SHITTIEST youtube comment ever........If you look at gun crazy america and very strict gun law Russia......
F4Wildcat 1 month ago
@F4Wildcat damn that was supposed to be funny not serius your comment was the SHITTIEST ever because you werent able to understand an ironic joke -.-...
chicagokabel 1 month ago
Better than in Massive Assault :D
lotto270 1 month ago
and i thought this was only in red alert o.O
0twinblade0 1 month ago
THATS NOT A FLAME THROWER!!!!!!
PulsereaperX 1 month ago
@PulsereaperX
This IS a flame thrower. As any morden flame thrower in any morden army. Forget about what you see in films about WW2.
ytonline33 1 month ago
Dear Santa...
sindaras 1 month ago
commander: you must destroy the base
*tank fires*
soilder: what base?
medkips1337 1 month ago
А где МАЛЬВИНА, АРТЕМОН, ПЬЕРО, ДУРЕМАР, КАРАБАС, ПАПА КАРЛО ? Н