The MYTEngine

[mikelo303]

Yeah. Russians already stole it. Why I am not surprised? They copy everything and claim their own.

[mikelo303]

What is the website?

[imgoddlike]

too good to be true? for now at least?

[socrates0ne]

Great! Wake me when it cost less than $35k

[mimi1girl2dempsey3]

So let's see, 1700HP on a 1/2 inch shaft.

Hmmmm, what's wrong with this picture?

[NizzBomb69]

wuts an "inch"

[The4LA2Baker0]

LoL... when he started it up it sounded just like a bong rip.

They have an in-depth website. They have updates. It seems this is for real and will hit markets soon.

[br8d1]

Dont be fooled. This is a WWII invention. Look up "Swing-piston engine" on wikipedia.

[SheWhoPlays]

Maybe with two of them, we can fly

[vege22o]

two things, one @ that torque the crank would shatter.

2 this was originaly realeased in 06....what happened of it?

[juggernautxtr]

@vege22o

no it wouldn't rotary engines do it all the time. your not pounding on the crank like a piston engine.

[Flinty88]

@vege22o gas companies probably had him killed

[torthetramp1]

i'd fuck it.

[Somesmuck]

Rubbish!! why not run all the 32? why just three with comprest air.

[silverbird58]

firing pulses are 24 times (closer together) . at every 12 deg. instead of every 720 i said that one two but given one 2 ltr cola bottle and 3 oz. of dry ice /add a cup and a half of water quickly add the cap and toss the explosionis atleast a 13 of a stick of dynamite with WITH NO FLASH OR HEAT OF ANY KIND now redefine power for me . .. all the noise in the world for 4th of july and fire safe however ya gotta be carefull..

[m4lvolio]

Added: 19 May 2006

Wohoo, we're living the revolution, baby!

Yeah.

[smileychirk]

Yeah right.

I guess you can run it on water as well.

[kallikusta]

the suckers who say its fake u think bunch of stupid ppl will let him conduct this shit and later he will disappear ?

losers!

[Evilempire13JZGTE]

This is Fake

1.) the mechanics and complex thin levers cant handle the torque of 800HP look at how thick the crank of a 1200hp 2JZGTE is!

2.) The turbine is way more efficeint powered by 2 fans that move the drive shaft.

look up the Y2K sport bike a small tiny 150lb alison rols royce 250 produces 400HP and runs on bio or diesel fuels Turbine is the only way to go from their its hydrogen fuel cell being cleaner and more efficient.

[juggernautxtr]

@Evilempire13JZGTE

your talking about a piston engine with connecting rods, beating on the crank. this is torsional to torsional force.

mazda wankel engines do this almost everyday with a smaller crank shaft than what's in a 1.3 liter piston engine.

[TommeyLeeReed]

My patented rotary piston engine is powerful too.

[mtzLEXUS]

Omfg this is so fucking awesome.

[mickeymoose76]

it doesnt work, its fake.

[schauswitz]

imagine what this could do to airplanes

[TRUPHSuperman]

definitely

[locouk]

This theory has been around for years, if it worked it would have been in mass production by now with major backing form the automotive giants.

[frekjabacon]

or squashed by the automotive giants so he can't be competitive

[locouk]

So at the time Mazda's rotary Wankel engine was this good too, why was this also not squashed by the giants? I still belive IF this MYT engine was to prove it worked, (Which no video I've seen shows it running on fuel) it would have had major backing since 2006 when this video was put on here. It's fizzled out like every other scam.

[frekjabacon]

for the same reason GM and the other oil investors dont give any or minimal funding for hydrogen fuel cell powered cars- its all about the money

[locouk]

So why has this MYT engine not been further developed if it's so great? If it is being trodden on, the MYT developers would make a noise about it, Prob on here amongst other places too. I'll let you invest, my money stays exactly where it belongs, in my pocket.

[mickeymoose76]

its fake, why doesnt he show it working?

[locouk]

Because it don't work.. If it did it would be rigged up to a dynamometer to show actual real time power and torque output readings.

[silverbird58]

maybe your correct here and it don't work at all . show me something you made in the last three years or so . that is at least this fastinating and DOES WORK!! i would love to see all your hard effort..

[commandersprocket]

Not so. This engine might do everything it says it does but require steel alloys and precision machining that cost 10x as much as existing engines. Engine tests have not been done long term (if you have an engine that works great 99.9% of the time, it's worthless). Think of the CVT, invented in 1400's, patented in 1935, and started being used in cars in the 1990's.

[inthahizzy]

When he enters the automotive x-prize with a working prototype I'll believe it.

[analogics]

Speaking of x-prize: 2 years ago another man, a physicist proposed "Gun engine", with fuel detonation, instead of combustion, to transfer more fuel to mech energy, and less to heat. And also 12 stroke cycle, to improve efficiency. Looks like he won the x-prize, and some fair in Germany. Since then - no more news. Where has it gone?

Source at peswiki . com / index . php / Directory:Gun_Engine

[xXDLF420Xx]

The damn oil or car companies probably bought it, locked it away. Think how much money the will lose.

[TRUPHSuperman]

actually he is not letting that happen, he actually wants to help ppl not just make big bucks

[ptairco]

I would feel like a total fool standing there proclaiming all kinds of wonders without having a prototype that actually does what it's supposed to. That is how you can tell a marketer from an engineer.

[ptairco]

Just one point among many - how the hell is this little thing going to get rid of the waste heat of 800 hp?? These snake-oil men give real inventors a bad name. There are tons of better IC engine designs out there than the current crank-and-piston types we use now, but this is not one of them. Reminds me of the Aussie "inventor" of the split cycle engine who managed to get 100 million in investors' money and after 8 years has an engine that can barely be coaxed into life at all.

[omygoodnessiluvit]

an engine the size of a coffee can with that performance..id put it in my Dart..shitt..new top speed records could be set with that..less engine..more room to be aero dynamic...sweet..does seem a bit wild tho

[bluefoxicy]

Remove 800 pounds from vehicle? Put 5 150 pound people in a Sedan and it doesn't go from 35 to 1mpg, it goes to like 33. It works the same the opposite way. Also 14 deep, 14 across, 14*pi*14 = 615, 850 cubic inches yeah right. And he's handwaving; he keeps talking about other stuff and going for sympathy (industrial revolution, new jobs, farmers, etc). It's BS.

[bertilxo]

volume of a cylinder measuring 14 deep, 14 across: phi x radius x radius x depth =

phi x 7 x 7 x 14 = 2154 cubic inches, not 615 as you writes...

[mageac]

the 14 across and 14 deep is the outside demention of the engine. and for the cubic inches of displacement the 2154 would be one piston... x by 32 would be 68964.4032... by my calulations... or 1131 liters... :s

[bertilxo]

well, as you can see, the engines outside is shaped as a cylinder. wich means its total inner volume would be around 2154, if it had no round courves/edges. The point is "bluefoxicy" didnt seem to believe that 850 cubic could fit in a Cylinder shaped box measuring 14 x 14..!! well, it can! and, by the way: 68964 cibic inches would be 1129630 liters, by my calculations... :D

[mageac]

a cubic inch is way smaller then a liter... just picture it in your head... a ford 5.0 liter engine is 302 cubic inches... and it kid of is 850 cid, it kinda reuses the same area over and over again so in a way it is other vids made it make more sense :)

[bertilxo]

yes, I wrote wrong..

yes, excactly, the engine is 850 cid, but the whole sylinders (engines) inner volume is a total of 2154:)

[bertilxo]

know, I wrote wrong.

Yes, excactly, the engine volume is 850 cid, but the total sylinder/engine volume is 2154:)

[bikemech121]

Could be someone just scamming for funding. The engineering flaw seems to be the complete lack of any cooling system, there are more cooling fins on a chainsaw engine. This engine could never run using petrol or any other combustible fuel, well perhaps 10 seconds at full bore but any more and it would melt. I also agree with comments about the output shaft, it would be a massive solid steel thing but I did not see one. Maybe it is just an air tool.

[flabbadango]

I'm a mechanical engineer.. I know for a fact that this cant be done! Most clearly shown in 'docthebiker's' response! Very perceptive. "doc"

[bobbypil]

your opinions mean precisely dick, what facts are they based upon? bunch of uneducated mindless sheep.

[fatdougie]

sounds like BS to me

[msdnvp]

i think the oil companies are already here

[CodeMercenary]

I don't think the motor vehicle companies give a shit what the oil companies think. If this engine could really do what its inventors claim, US auto manufacturers would give the oil companies the finger and go forward with it anyway. US auto companies aren't doing so hot right now, just in case you didn't notice.

[aviationist]

What? Why would you not put it in an actual vehicle? Through this whole video I get this really skeptical feeling. The only way I'm going to believe this is if I can see it providing physical power to an everyday car or truck with the real numbers and data to go along with it. It kind of seems like all that effort and time goes to waste if you didn't put it in a vehicle. I'm usually a very optimistic person but based on my knowledge of physics and mechanics, the MYT just can't produce.

[docthebiker]

Even if that engin works you could not transmit the HP and tourqe he claims for it down that tiny shaft.

The mechanical theory night be there but the pure physics of power transfere would require larger componants.

[SIP100]

This is a video of a con-artist nothing more.

[xander450]

People... that's a rotary air tool. Notice the distinct lack of exhaust. Damn, people are gullible.

[Twhupfold]

He specifically said he was running it only on compressed air for that demonstration... Damn, people don't listen. : P

[mungoesmad]

This concept does not work and will never work, anyone who knows anything about internal combustion engines will fall about laughing when they see this, leave the doughnuts to Homer!

[kscrosson]

This guy really undercuts his own credibility by playing the circus ringer. I wish he could just be honest. Its really cool, I just wish I didn't get that slimy feeling.

He says that the one port can drive three, but at zero pressure diff. so wtf.

[AvenaQuaker]

Don't believe the hype, this engine has never run on fuel. They have never dyno'ed its real performance to back up their claims.

[abram730]

the idea seen in the engine is great.. It clearly has some areas to fix... Like temperature dissipation and material strengths... A round wheel who would of thunk it.

[abram730]

As of now the answer is almost zero.. give us a way to make billions and we will consider rewarding your next invention... see the problem? If invention is Americas strength then how does a system without reward continue?

As to those that say dino it first... consider the first gas engine and note that it took 100 years to get here.. this is a better idea, a round wheel in a way.

[theAV8R]

Absolutely amazing! Please be sure to hide from the oil companies, dont let anyone trash this work!

[maxanova]

if this is legit, where is the functional demonstration?

show me it in action, moving a car, and I'll believe it.

[nuniyabidness]

Did he say the engine can run on air?

[icjinu]

I believe that governments is always trying make the public not to be skeptical about well established systems that have been around for ages; therefor many people find it hard to believe that this MYT Engine is the real deal. Also the well established old conventional engine is well protected by the car manufactures of today because they are profiting on it, and in short terms they would loose a huge amount of profit changing to a brand new engine configuration.

[petebc]

only now these engines can be seen and heard of by mass public because there are the tools to get the word out, and the major companies do actually supress the technology by buying it out and destroying it. stan meyers hydrolosis cell almost fell victim to it. look up the streetcar buyouts from Mack and GM in the 50's (i think thats when it happened) they bought up the streetcar systems in many cities and destroyed them, wanting to get more vehicles sold

[mechanisma22]

How come there are just now more efficient gas engines coming out, and I'm still paying for unnecessary heat and fuel waste with my current car.

[abram730]

The rich need to figure out how new ideas can have reward.. We know how much money they make on an idea like a piston engine. Yet how much money is their for an entire new type of thing.. How much reward in the genesis of knowledge?

[alkolex]

Where do i get one good god thats awesome

[bixlerscott]

Here is another video I found when Googling the subject. The sound of this engine is incredible!!!http://videogoogl­ecom/videoplay?docid=-54335530­47018998659