Sure they can run on the roads BUT if installed off road tracks they will damage roads and tracks. It is very expensive to use tanks as patrol support it it is used only when it extremely dangerous.
@FeelFree3 True, but the DAF truck is more than likely a 12Litre 6cyl (possibly v8), the tank is a diesel, possibly V12 20litre...with a top speed of 34mph, the truck is (at least in Europe) limited to 56mph
Why spend loads of money buying and maintaining tank transporters when you can pay a contractor as and when required. Did the tank go onto the back ok ... there you go then. no problem
@Taffnp yeah. A tank is about 60 tons, which can be easily hauled by tractor-trailers. A tank transporter is nothing more than a tractor-trailer anyway; change the paint scheme, and it's the same thing. The engines are almost always the same (a mack MP10 puts out more torque than a CAT or an Oshkosh), and it's a boost for the local economy, always a plus.
@mtunik hey whatever gets the job done..whether its a volvo or a HET (Which i drive) its still doing the same thing. Its getting the tank where it needs to go and with the terrain, HETs may not be cost effective to another military at the same time, it gives (and this is if its a civilian driving the tank hauler) it creates a job for that driver. Whatever works right?
the importent thing is that its can transport it good.
the IDF doesnt need to use useless tools that just cost more money, training and time for the IDF those 3 things are very importent since this army fight the real war and not showoff and do parades to show its power like other countries.
plus it will be not very smart to buy something your not gonna use dont you think?
@GTXMAN 1) it looks serious as long as it works. 2)many tank transporters in top notch armies are civilian types that received a coat of green camo: do you think that it makes a huge difference? YOU ARE A DUMBASS, DEFINITELY.
Sure they can run on the roads BUT if installed off road tracks they will damage roads and tracks. It is very expensive to use tanks as patrol support it it is used only when it extremely dangerous.
mtunik 3 weeks ago
А спорим на ЖД- платформу с боковой загрузкой задом сдать слабо.
Polykov1 2 months ago
I am not sure why a tank need transporter when it can be driven.
FeelFree3 2 months ago
@FeelFree3
Because it could only do about 1mile to a gallon, which is expensive if it needs to drive back to base!
(Hence a truck, which in this case is a DAF and not a Volvo, which probably uses less fuel pulling that tank!)
ImRatherTall 2 months ago
@ImRatherTall Even the truck have to carry more weight than the tank itself... Thank you.
FeelFree3 2 months ago
@FeelFree3 True, but the DAF truck is more than likely a 12Litre 6cyl (possibly v8), the tank is a diesel, possibly V12 20litre...with a top speed of 34mph, the truck is (at least in Europe) limited to 56mph
ImRatherTall 2 months ago
MAZELTOFF....period :)
BROCKLESNARFAN1980 10 months ago
Whatever the arguments are here on this vid.
I SAY " THIS TANK KICKS ASS" ;)
BROCKLESNARFAN1980 10 months ago
Seems to me mobilization with a common truck transporter is an advantage. Very nice engineering.
eggnogfrog 10 months ago
Why spend loads of money buying and maintaining tank transporters when you can pay a contractor as and when required. Did the tank go onto the back ok ... there you go then. no problem
Taffnp 11 months ago
@Taffnp yeah. A tank is about 60 tons, which can be easily hauled by tractor-trailers. A tank transporter is nothing more than a tractor-trailer anyway; change the paint scheme, and it's the same thing. The engines are almost always the same (a mack MP10 puts out more torque than a CAT or an Oshkosh), and it's a boost for the local economy, always a plus.
redreaper2020 10 months ago 3
Merkava is the best! (from israel)
slavka97 1 year ago 2
OK NOW SHOOT
the124Lscania 1 year ago
I was actualy waiting for the trailer tires to blow out !
1934rod 1 year ago
I came.
vef444 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thats not a tank transporter,its just a truck.Shame on Israel
GTXMAN 1 year ago
@GTXMAN
Shame on Israel that they do different thing?
Shame that do not use useless monsters?
Looks like you really don't know the subject that you commented!
Shame on You!
mtunik 1 year ago 17
@mtunik Whatever,for me it doesn't look serious,every respectable army has its Own REAL tank transporters and not some volvo truck .
GTXMAN 1 year ago
@GTXMAN
Did you drive REAL tank transporter? You know What is the REAL tank transporter?
Oshkosh was tested and found not suited for IDF needs...
Sometimes chipper and smaller options can do the JOB much better then monster truck that on pictures looks cool :)
mtunik 1 year ago 16
@mtunik Fine,I'll take your word If you say it suits IDF needs.
GTXMAN 1 year ago
@mtunik how is a oshkosh not 'suited' for IDF and a everyday truck with a everyday trailer is.......not be a smart but or genius just makeing a point
joegoestodanville 1 year ago
@joegoestodanville
You are professional driver? If Yes, you will understand what are limitations of Oshkosh and due to these limitations it is not suited for IDF.
mtunik 1 year ago 6
@mtunik hey whatever gets the job done..whether its a volvo or a HET (Which i drive) its still doing the same thing. Its getting the tank where it needs to go and with the terrain, HETs may not be cost effective to another military at the same time, it gives (and this is if its a civilian driving the tank hauler) it creates a job for that driver. Whatever works right?
jromig21 3 months ago
@mtunik
i dont understand why you fighting
its a truck that TRANSPORT a tank
the importent thing is that its can transport it good.
the IDF doesnt need to use useless tools that just cost more money, training and time for the IDF those 3 things are very importent since this army fight the real war and not showoff and do parades to show its power like other countries.
plus it will be not very smart to buy something your not gonna use dont you think?
and you know Israel... very smart country
adir999 2 months ago
@GTXMAN 1) it looks serious as long as it works. 2)many tank transporters in top notch armies are civilian types that received a coat of green camo: do you think that it makes a huge difference? YOU ARE A DUMBASS, DEFINITELY.
TheSquazzafuscus 3 months ago
@mtunik One question: Can this tank run on road?will it damage the roads?is it to wide?too heavy?
I am asking this to know how patrols are done in IRAQ/AFGHANISTAN with tanks
sscaero15 1 month ago
LOL the tank is bigger than the transporter
ManabuKempfer 1 year ago
this should be called ,,HOW TO MAKE LOW-RIDER ,,
dodoslovensko 1 year ago
lol its actually kinda cute seeing such a big thing get onto something that looks too small to transport it :P
Ahamster1 1 year ago
SHALOM VERY NICE VIDEOS TOV TODA
mrmakemakkara 1 year ago
Its not the truck that is small, its the tank that is fat-assed :)
Textrybal 1 year ago
@Textrybal does my but look big in this
haggis240 1 year ago
MAZ is the Belorussian truck
iloverebeccachambers 1 year ago
This is dam small truck for this monster O.o....if you ask me....
nedeljko031 2 years ago 3
May be :)
With total weight is around 100 ton this truck is more then enough. You can go nearly everywhere without any escort.
But you right, it looks "small" ;)
mtunik 2 years ago
yeah it really looks small...i like Russian transport trains (in fact its a truck but we call it train xD) MAZ is so fucking great xD
nedeljko031 2 years ago
Rise o'chariot..defender of your people...may you slay all before you!
gizzyG35 2 years ago