Building The World Trade Centers Part 1

[fdcninetyseven]

where is 9:05?

[bfbrochardt]

WTC Tower Structural Design Explained

[roberto9615]

rebuild the twin towers  say no to the freedom tower

[IRONSEAN7]

Great video,, thanks for this,, im a Union Ironworker in boston, and Videos like this make me proud,,

[wallless]

Does anyone know the titles of the music used in the film & if it's possible to get a copy? It's haunting.

[bertyUK]

If that's the case, can I recommend you listen to Boards Of Canada?

[letargic4]

Great!!!

thanks 4this

[chromatous]

This video is misleading as to the construction of the towers... The 47 core and box columns were the main structural supports for the buildings.

When was this made? Is this the original audio?

[sweetgrab333]

The Towers where completed in 1972

[ytcf71]

@chromatous No the outer walls were the main load bearing structure. As said in this original video, and on the documents pictured in this video. Everything else you have heard is misinformation from conspiracy theorists.

[CobraMarty]

@chromatous Uhm, no as the ORIGINAL graphics show and as the narrator says, the OUTER walls were the bearing structure! Another brainwashed-it-was-not-terrori­sts person...

[Triglavus]

@CobraMarty Just saying, that after your "consipiracy theorists failed talk" crap it is more unlikely that it was terorist attack. As the outer walls were the main load bearing structure, not many of them were destroyed by the planes, let´s say that 2/3 of columns at one side. That leaves us with 5/6 of all (as you sayed) main support columns absolutely unharmed. By your (brainwashed-it-was-not-terror­ists) logic fires should be extinguished, people saved, building repaired.

[CobraMarty]

@Triglavus Again, as all conspiracy-thinkers fail to take in concideration... STEEL MELTS! Melting steel is worth nada! And therefore can't support anything.. even if it's not all the colomns that were destroyed, a huge imbalance in weight distribution occurs, which overloads the remaining columns, and were coloumns used to be, supporting the weight, there's nothing, but air = Crash... No more building

[robertdevald]

@CobraMarty Yes, but not at the temperature that occured on 9/11. Or SUPPOSED to occure...

[wsee]

@CobraMarty yup!

and PLANES MELT into STEEL AND CONCRETE BULDINGS, right???

no parts fall to the ground when it hits the building!...no explosion happens until AFTER the plane has seamlessly entered (as if in sexual intercourse) the STEEL AND CONCRETE TOWER...normal???

no way! talking about those

PIXEL PLANES, MATE!!!

CRAP CGI B.S. INSERTS (all 35, that's all there were, 'amateur' vids and all 6 secs. network footage) PROVEN 100% FAKE...

look at any one of those PATHETIC RENDERINGS!!!

[CobraMarty]

@wsee So, you're saying the plane was supposed to explode BEFORE hitting the building??I see.

And nothing falling to the ground after it hit??? What a bunch of croc.. There's a huge explosion and debris flying out from the other side. And I'll tell you why it didn't explode until it was all the way IN the building (as it would be for any plane hitting any given building) ... Fuel tanks are located in the MIDDLE of the aircraft

lol have a little sense, and try to think rationally..

[2621ss]

@CobraMarty Actually, the fuel tanks are located in the wings.

[thybigballs]

@CobraMarty Yes steel melts but not at the temperatures of burning fuel and office furniture. Does your BBQ grill melt when you use it? I have many years experience with heating metals above the temperatures of burning fuel. It is unfathomable to me how JP5 fuel can heat metal to a molten state at the towers. This goes against everything I know.

[TheAfricanBatman]

@thybigballs

Actually the fires burned at 1800 degrees and steel melts at 2700 degrees. the impact blew off the fireproofing and the fires weakened the steel to the point of structural failiure

[thybigballs]

@TheAfricanBatman NIST as well as others agree most of the fuel burned away within a few seconds. The remaining fuel was office furniture. I'm sorry but office furniture is not going to do it. Even under the best conditions I use to heat thick metal (usually with 480 volts of electricity per machine x several machines) it takes longer than these buildings held just to get it to 1100-1300 degrees. What in the world caused all the molten metal? Was it the magic diesel fuel and wooden chairs?

[thybigballs]

@TheAfricanBatman Also, it only took a mere few minutes for molten metal to be seen in many videos. Do you not find it odd at all that thick metal went from room temperature to flowing like lava within several minutes? Can diesel fuel do this? Try this little experiment: Take a wimpy aluminum beer can and put it in your hot BBQ grill and see how long it takes for it to become molten or collapse. Put a weight on it if you want. Then imagine the thicker tower metal being heated up. :-)

[TheAfricanBatman]

@thybigballs

The molten metal you saw. Was aluminum from the airplanes. Since Aluminum starts to glow orange and melts at 1100 degrees and the fires burned at 1800 degrees. Do a little research on how the WTC was engineered and how it was structural failiure. BTW airplanes are usaully 80% aluminum. Its not "Molten metal"

[thybigballs]

@TheAfricanBatman I did research the WTC construction as well as having been a structural steel inspector. Usually, iron workers hated to see me coming to inspect their work. I performed NDT testing as well as heat treatment of metal mainly during fabrication or repair routinely at temps of 1100 and above. I grew up around aircraft (airforce brat) as well as worked on them in the military. If all that sounds fishy I also have 18 yrs experience with military explosives. It's molten metal.

[TheAfricanBatman]

@thybigballs

Such amounts of bullshit you just stated there i think you gave me cancer. Its aluminum from the aircraft not molten metal. The steel never melted but weakened it to the point of structural failiure. If your proof is that one video of the aluminum thats orange drippingout of the south tower. No, that is not molten metal it is aluminum.

[thybigballs]

@TheAfricanBatman You are certain it was aluminum how exactly? Was this the same type of molten metal after 8 weeks? I'm confused about your last sentence. You do know aluminum is a metal right? I got a chuckle from your first sentence as I knew I would. It's ok though. I wouldn't necessarily believe it either in this context.

[TheAfricanBatman]

@thybigballs

First off give your evidence or pictures of this molten metal after 8 weeks. Typical truther instead of providing a arguement all you do is insult me cause youre backed into a corner. I can provide you some evidence if you want or better yet theres videos on here that actually go in depth to explaining all these things including your silly "molten metal" story. Provide more info into why you think its molten metal, instead of repeating and blabbering on and on

[thybigballs]

@TheAfricanBatman Where did I insult you? I think you need to reread your post about bullshit, cancer. What was that? Are we pot/kettling? And then you say, " No, that is not molten metal it is aluminum". What was that sentence about? Watch the two clips I sent you. Please do as you said and show me the evidence there was no molten metal weeks after or that it was explained away. I'm basically providing a similar argument to you. I'm unsure of your "backed into a corner" statement. Explain plz.

[thybigballs]

@thybigballs Here's some info of molten aluminum not being red/orange: /watch?v=u1ClwGXDRVs

[thybigballs]

@TheAfricanBatman Check out FEMA's Appendix C metallurgical examination of some structural steel.

[davidronaldp]

30 years 2 build your having a laugh

[godzilla1234567890]

Where the hell did you hear 30 years? Are you being funny or are you just plain stupid. Groundbreaking began in August 1966 and steel erection began in 1968. The Towers topped out in 1970 and 1971. Then they finally opened in 1973. That's 6 to 7 years not 30 moron.

[slatcher116]

it took 7 years to built n also they were already rebuilding it they started in summer 2007 so its gonna be done in 2014

[davidlee110]

is cost $3.7 to $3.8 Trillion Dollars to built them and yes we are going rebuilt them but is not going be the same but is will cost $5.6 to $5.75 Trillion dollars to rebuilt them and yes NYC goverment got alease $20 Trillion Dollars - Of you Hate America then go FUCK yourself

[Abricialio]

I miss the towers, if there was enough money then rebuild the towers. ):

I don't like the Freedom tower.

[splintercellfool]

this was very interesting I enjoyed it very much! thanks for the post

[AIRMAN217]

it took 10 years for those building to be build and 10 second for them to crash into the streets of manhatten

[splintercellfool]

actually it was over 5 hours

[RATM4EVER]

its still a very short time, i think a fraction of the actual time it took to bulid

[DontBeAfraidToCare]

Zeitgeistmovie dot com

Many of you probably know about this movie, but for those who don't I think it's really worth watching.

Oblivious America needs to wake up.

[leonnie197666]

im from the u.k and it made me sick when the towers where attacked by pure fucking scum thay took so long to build any one who attacks the west should be strung up and shot. the western world is the way forward. the sick backward brain washed med-evil cunts who attack us should just kill each other then thay can have there 12 virgins L.O.L

[judoka1]

leonnie197666! let me ask you then how many "tramps" would the western world tools have when they attack innocent civilians for oil or Zionism or what have you?! when the western world imposed an embargo on Iraq and attacked it day and night over a million civilians died! so how many tramps did the get for that??

[splintercellfool]

ur right the west is the way forward and the UK especially ur humor is the way back into cavemen times.  retard

[mitchyere2k8]

even though im from the u.k i agree with you complety

[mitchyere2k8]

anyway what wrong with the u.k

[codineNskunk]

yes, i heard about that one, dont belive one word of it myself but there is a so called live image that has clearly been faked, i think it was fox but not sure. its on youtube somewher, shoudnt be to hard to fing though

[codineNskunk]

no of course not, i am mearly commenting on the appearance of what happened. I am allowed to do that arent I? If its ok with you , sir

[codineNskunk]

I cant fathom how a plane could smash through steel columns that were obviously high grade steel, even if the planes velocity was fast it went through like the towers steel columns were made paper with no kind of reistance on impact either?

[James8516]

They were very amazing buildings. I wish they never were destroyed because I wanted to go to them again. Very beautiful buildings, touching the stars and becoming two

[zonezonezone123456]

i agree! last time i visited was December of 2000

[none890]

i dont think they were ugly

[drunkmonkey67]

my uncle was a ny firemen in nyc in chinatown from 62 to 68 and brooklyn heights from 68 to 80. he did drills in the wtc and he told me many times how unsafe they actually were. the fdny had no say on how they were built or any fire/safety measures.when i told my uncle that my wife got a job on the 85th floor of tower two he told to tell her to get out if she hears of any kind of incident even a small fire.she survived 9/11.

[arneil5]

biggahthebettah (4 days ago)

If it's a known/given fact that fire will bring down a steel structure, 1)why on earth are skyscrapers allowed to be built at all and 2) why bother EVER sending firefighters to fight fires when they are just going to come down anyway?

they were trying to evacuate the people you tard

[TVADICT]

Err no steel structure has ever collapased becouse of fire. Ediot, WTC WAS DEMOLITION REMEBER WTC7.

[JEC59OFRUNESCAPE]

are you retarded? why the hell would they rebuild something like that? its too weak! the freedom tower is enhanced and has more support and shit. so they are re-building, just not the twc!

[biggahthebettah]

If it's a known/given fact that fire will bring down a steel structure, 1)why on earth are skyscrapers allowed to be built at all and 2) why bother EVER sending firefighters to fight fires when they are just going to come down anyway?

[ubmx]

"The cranes were assembled on top of the core columns, each could lift 60 tons at a time. They would be the driving force behind the towers construction"

What about the official pancake theory? So these core columns fell at free fall speed with each floor? WTF?!? Wake up people or be remembered as a complete idiot.

[TVADICT]

Whats weird about the footage is seeing the big bathtub with that ramp and those trucks, the site is exactly the same now as it looked back in the 1960's. soo weird.

[itgoeslikethis]

I think instead of the 'freedom tower' they should rebuild the world trade center new york, in the same proportions only bigger.

[bmw4090]

Thanks for posting. I remember watching this in my artchitecture class a few days after 9/11.

[socalkev]

we could still stop id the lmdc is closed for ever and the people are speaking up for the twin towers fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuc­k yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee­eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah

[socalkev]

we're every one is working for this goal thats when i thought about the construction of the twin towers wtc rip 1973-2001

[ulrek54321]

1963-2001

[socalkev]

I was there on 1998 and agust and september 2001 that shit was crazy when it fell New York needs back her knights in shining armor in the song of angels and airwaves the adventure on one of the lyrics he sings if your gonna fall i'll let you know that I will pick you up like you for I i thought about that picture were you see the soldiers lifting the twin towers back up then i heard I felt this thing I cant replace

[U3D]

America needs a new landmark now, we should rebuild it exactly as it was, and have all the names put on the globe in the middle of the plaza or engrave them into the plaza....after 5 years its still just a giant hole.....

[Thrashaero]

yeah...too bad they're going to build the 'freedom' tower instead by the people who brought the twin towers down....pathetic

[TVADICT]

WOW the TWIN TOWERS were sooo amazing, so sad there gone

[headn]

wow it was an amazing building

[edmond4]

ItchyandScratchy,

Way to be. I'm stunned at the fools otu there willing to lie about these buildings, such as retired BYU Professor Firmage who ruins his reputation by stating they had a "hollow tube" construction. He's a wicked liar, or foolishly made too quick a critique of BYU Physics professor Dr. Steven E. Jones research without knowin the facts. The inner steel columns were monstrous and NOVA as well as Firmage ignore this, as well as WTC 7

[davetheguitarplayer]

I myself am not sure whether or not they had "hollow tube" construction or not and you may be right, but if you're gonna call someone a "wicked liar", the rest of the world and I would like to know your facts as to the contrary.

You know, facts: the first and only thing one MUST have to prove or disprove something.

[edmond4]

Absolutely facts are needed, and all over the place on this subject matter, except for example in the Main Stream Press or the 9/11 Commission Report. I would invite you to begin with the documentaries found at this URL triple w (dot) awakeandarise(dot)org (forward slash) article (forward slash)911mysteries(dot) htm. If you want excellent reading, Dr. Jones paper would be good, followed with Webster Tarpley's "911 Synthetic Terror Made in the USA."

[edmond4]

Dave,

Also, Dr. Firmage of BYU should not have been called a wicked liar. He's dead wrong in his critique of Dr. Jones where he failed to address the collapse of World Trade Center 7, just as the 9/11 Commission report didn't say one word about this 47 story skyscraper either. Though I disagreed with him and found his critique too much in hast without knowing basic facts, so I too in much haste called him a "wicked liar." He may be well and sincere, but just wrong, not a liar, nor wicked.

[xenoploid]

Yeah, I've never heard an explanation for World Trade Center 7 collapsing.

[Chuckmills]

yeah hmmm i wonder why it fell as quick as throwing a rock off the top....... Use youre head

[Gazeboman]

Haha, your exactly right....I hear you. We both know why.

[davetheguitarplayer]

first off, I think you mean "your" head. not "you're" head. that would be "you are" head.

second, didn't you learn basic physics when you were a kid? it's called gravity. you drop a 5lb. weight and a 20lb. weight off of something and they will both land at the same time.

rock, metal, etc fall at the same speed.

[biggahthebettah]

Yes, metal falls at the same speed, unless it has to power its way through other steel, concrete and floors full of office furnishings first.

[Louise2k5]

It took so long to build yet fell so quick....so sad

[aikens123]

absolutely amazing.....