How To Solve Parity On The Last 7x7x7 Edge

[atomsmasher55]

u never did x'

[crescentguys999]

omg thhhankk yooooyyyyyuuyuyuyuyyuyy!!!

[Falco98]

What's the point of the "X" move? can't the algo be simplified quite a bit by just making some of the U's into F's?

Also it would help me a bit if your "3 cases" description here contained some description of what the cases actually are -- like OOXOO, OXOXO, OXXXO (or something like that).

[arsonist171]

You go to fast

[jbinminot]

DUDE! What is "x"? You never bother to explain this! Why don't you describe the moves as you do them?

[cedalege]

@jbinminot x is moving the cube on the x axis. so in this case x is move the cube so your bottom face becomes your front face and vica versa

[864142]

What does the "x" in the algorithm mean? I understand everything else from the 5x5 but is the "x" the "f" for the 5x5.

[swedishcuber]

Do i have to learn all the parity algs, or is one enough?

[esquimalt1]

@swedishcuber Well put it this way, all the algorithms are the same, except they grip different layers. And yeah you'll want to learn them all.

[trinity173]

Second case algorithm: 3R U2 3R x F2 3R 2R' F2 x' 2L 3L' U2 2L' 3L U2 3R' 2R U2 3R 2R' U2 3R' U2 3R'

That should be it. I realised you did 2L then 3L' but in the one in the descritption is the opposite.

[trinity173]

I hope you read this. But I think you wrote the algorithm for parity case 2 incorrectly. Notice in the video how you put the front face up the top. So in reality it's a front instead of an up. x U2 3R 2R' U2 x this bit should be x F2 3R 2R' F2 x I'm pretty sure.

[trinity173]

I hope you read this. But I think you wrote the algorithm for parity case 2 incorrectly. Notice in the video how you put the front face up the top. So in reality it's a front instead of an up.

[swedishcuber]

Extremely helpful video. I'm very impressed. Extremely good. We need cubers like you who explain things very well. I don't have anything bad to say about the video. It's just great.

[esquimalt1]

@swedishcuber thanks a lot!

[timberswiss3]

i really do hate this video and i know people are going to say "then don't watch it" but i feel like i have to because this is the best youtube has to offer on 7x7 parity cases. Your video is downright horrible, you go way too fast and even though the algorithms are written in the description I'm on youtube to have someone show me how to do it not read an algorithm list. Hopefully your future videos are better and are a little more step by step.

[JostleCubed]

@timberswiss3 Wow.. You really suck, you can't even bother to take 2 minutes to learn notation.

[timberswiss3]

@JostleCubed you're the one that really sucks. sucks at reading that is. i didnt complain about notation. i just wanted to see it done a little bit more slowly. if i could do it 100% by reading notations i would be on google searching for a list. Stupid...

[JostleCubed]

@timberswiss3 But, if you could properly read notation, his speed shouldn't make a difference, you could just read the alg. So either, you suck at learning algs, or you can't read notation. Go learn more algs, or learn how to read notation.

[timberswiss3]

@JostleCubed you just don't understand the fact that some people are visual learners. if a video is made its for the visual learners because "cube masters" like you can just read an algorithm list and solve the cube. congratulations, now leave people alone that don't learn quite like you do jerk

[JostleCubed]

@timberswiss3 No... you just suck, also I'm not a cube master. I average 21-23 for 3x3. However I can read notation, it's not my fault you're too lazy to learn.

[timberswiss3]

@JostleCubed again i'm a visual learner. and youre just an asshole >_>

[JostleCubed]

@timberswiss3 You're right about the asshole part, I know I am and I try to do my best, thanks. But you're just lazy. Learn notation, get good.

[timberswiss3]

@JostleCubed im not gonna argue with you anymore and ill end this on this note. i am not lazy because i am choosing to learn. i am fine with notation but i get mixed up with x and y turns. so there. work on your people skills, those aren't as easy to learn as notation is but with perseverance you'll be fine.

[JostleCubed]

@timberswiss3 But... notation include rotations... You could just learn that. Though, if you're having trouble, XYZ follows RUF, so x would be like an R but with the entire cube, same for y = U and F = z. Same goes for y' etc.

[milcin2051]

omg you go way to fast to follow and your algorithms are wrong ive done it like 50 time and it gets more screwed up.... please fix it

[esquimalt1]

@milcin2051 lol the ones in the description are right, make sure you know notation

[Zimmy68]

@esquimalt1 I think the first case algorithm in the description is wrong.

It should start like (according to his moves):

3R U2 x

not

3R U2 3R x

[milcin2051]

go slower please



[nikodr]

Second algorithm you posted is wrong.The correct is 3R U2 3R x U2 3R 2R' U2 x' 2L' 3L U2 2L 3L' U2 3R' 2R U2 3R 2R' U2 3R' U2 3R' what you do in the video is not correct,in move no 8 you write "3L' 2L U2 2L' 3L U2 etc" while the correct is " 2L' 3L U2 2L 3L' U2 etc"

[C53H]

best tutorial out there for parity error, thnx

[nikodr]

it's nice but please next time do it a little slower,it's too confusing and fast,plus you roate the cube when you add the x so that would be nice to note,remember you know it by heart but someone that wants to do it,wants to see it slow,maybe 2-3 secs delay between each movement,youtube allows up to ten minutes,other than that it is a nice video...thumbs up

[esquimalt1]

@nikodr thanks for the suggestion, i'll make sure to keep that in mind for future tutorials!

[dandyboykb]

i thionk people should be able to solve the parity if they already know how to solve the 4x4 and 5x5

[Djxi4o]

Is the cube smooth ?

[zplmx]

what is x



[DrewstaRoosta123]

I think that the reason people are confused, is they don't understand the move notation. They probably don't understand what X means. You should probably just put the algorithm in an annotation so people will stop bitching at you.

[wizcube1]

Bwisit wala naman algorithm na nilgy paano malalaman un galaw

Stupid tutorial for parity Error

[esquimalt1]

@wizcube1 stupid tutorial or stupid person who can't follow it?

[dmr177]

well, I'm off to find a tutorial that doesn't include x's and where the person actually teaches, doesn't just speed through and tell people to read the description

[muscaverde]

Hy there, you too, man, keep it up I wish you the best , if you ever come to Romania, live me a message, I'll be glad to meet you!

[muscaverde]

Hy there, thanks a lot, guess I am the stupid fuck, ain't I? LLOOLL See you, take care

[ranchlingger]

i do those cases differently. but im not nearly half as good as you are, so ill probably learn those when i get time.

[Arseization]

In the first case you did 3R U2 x ... but in the describtion you wrote 3R U2 3R x ...

but i liked your vid anyway helped me to learn the algorithms

Thanks!

[DanHetfieldSH]

@Arseization In the video, he did the 3R after doing the x. It doesn't matter if you do the 3R before or after the x, the x won't affect any L or R movements.

[Boiza75]

ok. i might be an idiot. but i can't see any letters during you do the algorithm...

[esquimalt1]

@Boiza75 description isn't good enough?

[muscaverde]

u stupid fuck, blow me, learn how to explain, dumb prick, or at least write down the moves, you moron fuck

[klangwii]

@muscaverde made me lol...

[muscaverde]

@klangwii

:d I love you man, you got a great sense of humor, sorry about that post, I wish you the best!!! :d:d

[esquimalt1]

@muscaverde the moves were in the description the whole time btw lol

[klangwii]

@muscaverde cheers man :D have a good life!

[CraziMEXICAN96]

@muscaverde look in the description you dumbass

[atlsoldier27]

on the second one i think it war you only do the inside layers and not all the outside layers with it

what is the alg. cuz i dont see it in description

I NEED HELP :p

[SydVicious1357]

can you make tutorial for the last two edges

memyself&pi is fucking irritating.

[SydVicious1357]

quick question in the secod algorithm it says

3R U2 3R x U2 3R 2R'

what does 3R 2R' mean?

[TheYoyodude101]

i get it but in the discription what does the x's mean?

for example the first case one goes: 3R, U2, 3R x what is the x

please respond

[esquimalt1]

@TheYoyodude101 it's a cube rotation.

x means you make the side that's the F face and make it become the U face.

x' means you make the side that's the U face and make it become the F face.

[TheYoyodude101]

@esquimalt1 Oh thanks so much!

[zippoxl91]

@TheYoyodude101 there are three notations that aren't correspondent to the sides, x, y, and z. Those are commands to move not the sides, but the entire cube. imagine the cube is on a 3D axis. X means you rotate the cube clockwise on the X axis. Y on the Y axis. and Z on the Z axis

[eLeMeNtsKaTeRgUy96]

wtf i keep doing your fuckin algorithm and i keep messin up my cube

[SydVicious1357]

@eLeMeNtsKaTeRgUy96

i had the same problem but you have to look carfully if it says for example "2R' 3R"

youre holding different layers.. and at first i thought x meant the middle layer but i actually means you ahve to turn the whole cube, either x= F becomes U or x' U becomes F

[sackman11]

Thanks for the tutorial. Edge parity on this sucker is killing me. What does the x' mean?

[esquimalt1]

@sackman11 you rotate the cube so that the side that is on U now becomes the side on F

[Tovurnak92]

nice 7x7. Tovurnak92 must have really nice cubes

[esquimalt1]

@Tovurnak92 no, his 7x7 isn't broken in well enough

[Tovurnak92]

@esquimalt1 well im sure he has a nice 4x4 mini qj and a modified A V

[CubingFactor]

it would be cool if u make a video on tips on how to get faster at the 7x7.

[137456]

thank you i've always been wondering how to solve that one case you missed last time!!! :):):):):):):):):)

[tompster]

NOT FIRST. But really useful video win. :D

[magnum66]

This video is SO MEAN!!!!

[esquimalt1]

@magnum66 what did i do this time

[ilikechess1]

thts not your main 7x7 is it

[Antall18]

@ilikechess1 he probably replaced the stickers

[esquimalt1]

@ilikechess1 haha you're right it's a friend's.

[Antall18]

first (im gonna regret doing this)

[esquimalt1]

@Antall18 nope, I don't mind firsts lol I do it all the time