i use itunes to snyc my ipod and thats it, i use foobar for other things becuase it doesn't require any other services and doesn't take up much space, and with the custom layout its great
just a question ... you added a directory to foobar's playlist NOT the library (as you did in winamp) so basically you just scanned for files ... why didn't you do this in winamp before you say foobar is faster ? (4k+ songs in under a sec :) (under REAL network environment )) and yes ... try not using "new bento skin" but the default one in winamp THEN tell me it loads so damn slow
@marioG211 The combination of your comment and the following in your profile "FOUND A SITE WAY BETTER THAN LOCKERZ COPY AND PASTE THE LINK AND SUBSCRIBE" cements my perception of the average iTunes userl; DUMB.
@marioG211 Apparently you were too slow to catch onto my emulating your grammar and unneccessary capslock, which had been rendering you retarded. Judging by your less than clever retort/insult, I've come to the conclusion that you are, in fact, inbred.
I use Jet Audio because it has perfect sound, also with WIDE effect. This sound is the best I ever heard. Even Winamp with plugins and outputs can't do this sound.
mediamonkey is a fav of mine...mostly because i can rename files at the drop of a hat,which comes in handy cause i have a ton of song (both folders and files) that are a mess
@Netrex44 But when you have it set up the way you want it, use a portable install and move it to Dropbox. 2GB of file space means fb2k and other small open-source programs have more than enough room to grow.
You can also install Dropbox portably on a USB drive with a bit of a hacked copy called DropboxPortable. Go for the older copies if you can find 'em, latest version as of this writing might work for you, but if it doesn't going with something slightly older works as well.
anyways.. I've tried Foobar many times and always thought i'd never learn this program but then one day which was yesterday i played with the program and finally i can see how much better this media player is than winamp and all others..
It's an advanced media player. It's not "out of the box" but that's just cool cos' you can configure it the way you want. I just had trouble doing that from the start :P
@voltz15 Hell of a necropost. But i may as well say, foobar2000 1.0.3 has something called Dolby Headphone Wrapper, which is something for foobar's DSP settings. Enable it by finding a copy of dolbyhph.dll on your PC or online and telling it where it is.
Let's be clear; foo_dsp_dolbyhp.dll goes into your \components folder. dolbyhph.dll stays out of it. Place it in the main directory of your player instead.
The only downer is, foobar does no video. But aside from that, works well as portable.
naked foobar looks... naked. Try it with fooAvA interface... looks better than the others, obviously display covers and still uses less resources and runs faster than the rest.
Foobar does load Album Covers, you just have to configure the interface correctly. Also, you forgot to mention itunes' Bonjour service which takes quite some resources.
foobar is the best overall. winamp has too many bugs, itunes is a bloated, intrusive pig, and wmp11 is ok, but i don't like how it sorts songs by artist.
No need to apologize, you help me make up my mind. Thank you. Oh. You should apologize for having so much rubish music. I saw britney spear a lot of times on your list.
Winamp is alot better, but i was wondering can anyone tell me the best plug in to enhance my winamp5.57? i want to enhance the sound and my system is logitech z5500..any help would be nice, i've read about Enhancer 017..can anyone advise me..thanks.
Ok, don't mark this as spam cus im serious. If you ever get the chance to download "VLC Media Player", I think you would be very impressed. What I do is you VLC to play music and foobar to organize it. Very easy.
No seriously. Everyone I know who has Pro cracked it. If you like Nullsoft, please support them. Wished foobar could support video so I can convert others into using it, since foobar2000, while not the best out of the box allows you to make it whatever the hell you want it to be, musically and graphically.
I have noticed a problem in AIMP that do not show up in the others.
Instead of playing all the samples to the end, and then looping back to the beginning to play again, in certain situations, it will play to the end and loop to the beginning and play a mix of both the beginning and a section of the end. It's an odd error, but one that does not show up with the other players.
Also, the sound quality is not as good. Something about the harmonics is flat.
@stevyainzo foobar2000, shpeck plugin, look on the hydrogenaudio forums for foo_vis_shpeck and look at the last few posts as of posting this. If you want a pre-hacked DLL, send me a PM and I'll give it to you, and I even have a guide called Shpeck for Newbies (Yes, a dedicated website for it).
I use AIMP2 as well, but I don't understand what practical difference does 26 MB vs 5 MB make, when we commonly have 2... 4... 8... GB of RAM these days? how often does that 21 MB of saved RAM matter to you?
Wow, look at those stats! Great comparison. I hate it when programs have hidden services running in the background! Foobar2k's lack of services is a huge plus, as well as it's very small footprint, and speed. It would easily be the best sound-ap of all time and probably is, but for sound-programmer's who need to work with powerful, and high-end soundfiles, which both winamp and foobar2k are capable of, Foobar falls short because it does not SHARE. Should have learned that in kindergarten...
Winamp is the best media-player by far. It plays many formats, including 32 bit, high-bitrate soundfiles, which WMP does not, and it is very fast.
Foobar2k is equally as good as Winamp, and has the same advantages and power with one big exception. Foobar2000 does not share the soundfile that it's playing. This is a major drawback for me, a sound-programmer. Another flaw is that it's programmer is impossible to contact. WMP just does not compete in the power arena.
It depends what os you are operating too. like itunes will run faster if you are using mac osx. that goes with wmp11 if you are running vista etc. So it really depends on the os
the cool thing about winamp though is it can play pretty much ANY kind of media file you can think of. winamp is great for live streaming too. as he said it opens faster if you just leave the agent alone.
i know this starts sort of like a cheesy commercial ;) but well. like most ppl, i was a long time winamp user - once i tried foobar i switched. it's more convenient. it provides multiple playlist support (tabbed). it's easily customizable (you don't have to hunt for some buggy plugins). it has a built-in media library. it allows you to perform file operations (e.g. copying all the songs into one folder) - by a couple of clicks. i can't list all the features here... i recommend it 100%.
i may be wrong but my impression is that winamp is the equivalent of internet explorer - the majority people who stick with it, have never simply tried any alternative
@obbytoo actually you are forced to look at it when you change the song AND watch exactly what are you doing to NOT mess your playlist :) while in winamp you just send it to tray and forget about it (true hotkeys ftw)
Winamp just looks better, and it's fast at adding music too (Foobar was faster because like he said it doesn't add album art)
Winamp is easier to use as well, has some cool features, good skins, and you can use the DFX audio plugin, which is amazing, and the other programs other than Windows Media Player can't use that program, so I would say Winamp is the best one.
@houleagain9048 Not everyone has the money for it, or the space. Myself, I use a craptop. It's a single core that's begun to choke on everything because I have too much shit running on it at once, lol
Tried Foobar twice before, over the years, hated it for the terrible UI. Had to use Foobar again recently to do some format conversions, noticed how nice everything sounded. Then AB'ed with wmp and iTunes which has the awsomest UI, but in the end it's the sound that matters. Now the only thing I can to listen to is Foobar. Wmp and iTunes sound same, that is, crappy.
I use JBL LSR32's. Decent, by ANY standard.
WinAmp may sound good with the right setup, but Foobar sounds great out of the box.
If you have a lot of music and like your music tags, then Foobar is for you. I have been using it for a couple years now and though there is a learning curve it isn't as large as some would say. Just learn it little by little.
fb2k has a library feature and album art. You make it look like a POS. You can also change the layout of the GUI to suit your needs to almost any way you want. I think you poorly reviewed fb2k in my opinion.
I switched from iTunes to Winamp yesterday, and it's much better, foobar2000 looks like it has awesome speed and resource usage, but I couldn't figure it out.
Even though I own a laptop that can handle many of the heavier stuff out there, I still always get the lightest weight players. I originally was a winamp guy for years, and then I started noticing that winamp was becoming buggier and bloated. I switched to foobar and never looked back. Winamp just went down the drain when AOL brought the rights to nullsoft. :(
ITunes......lol that's the worst. Well. Its the worst if you have been using computers say before the year 2000. People these days can't seem to cope without programs with "libraries" that hide directory structure of there HDD from them. As the concept of such a thing is too hard for people these days. The amount of times I get asked by someone where their 5GB music collection actually is when they want to backup because they have no idea.....
Nice video. Traditionally, I'm not a big fan of Microsoft; BUT, I have to say Windows Media Player 11 is so much more responsive than iTunes 7. The 'gapless' feature that Apple introduced into iTunes 7 completely destroyed the player, making it slow and bulky. I haven't tried Foobar yet, but I'll give it a try.
foobar is my favorite, i really use itunes just for my ipod, and ill play songs on there if its already up, and wmp11 is fine if you dont want to install anymore players
If you are smart, and geeky . _____ PLZ use foobars. sure it's complex and hard to program. But it can be your best player, because You can actually design how it looks and how it plays.
You mentioned that foobar2000 "might not show all the album artwork". Not true, it will show all the album artwork that your files are tied to automatically after importing.
WMP 11 is a good player, even when im multitasking pretty hard, no locking up or crashing, it's pretty stable. I use REAL from time to time but WMP is what i use from time to time. I havent used WINAMP for a couple of years but i experienced no problems with it either.
Foobar2000 is honest to god the best music player I have ever used. I don't need 10,000 visualisations, because it's usually running in the backround (never using more than 20mb of RAM). I have customized it more so than I could ever do with any of the other players. I can skin it too, but what's the point? All I might do is change the background color.
Anyways, typical computer users use typical programs. Enjoy your WHY COMPUTER STOP RUNNING WHEN I MAKE SONG SING?
I am guessing you use windows vista home premium, probably an emachines package deal for under $800, and you are probably also under the age of 14, and know little about computers.
tools -> preferences -> advanced -> downloads -> uncheck "hide files opened with opera" -> quickfind -> type "torrent" -> select it -> edit -> check "open with default application" and select the uTorrent .exe. i know demonikreaper has probably answered already...just ~sharing the info~ :D
Foobar2000 0.9.4.5 is superior to all the new versions when it comes to ram. Workes just as great. :) 30 000 songs in playlist and playing=10 MB in ram. Minimized=3 MB.
So what is the best?
KalizVids 10 hours ago
Lmao face down ass up. xD
SeanS373N 1 day ago
he forgot bonjour for apple.
martinboson 3 months ago
damn PCs were slow in 2008
narsplace 3 months ago
Itunes is bloatware.
mewimi 4 months ago
Your winamp loads a great deal slower than mine o.O" and I have agent disabled lol
mewimi 4 months ago
You should always play the same song, due to codecs/quality.
mewimi 4 months ago
Winamp ftw!
Tryed foobar2000 but didn't like it. Plus foobar2000 is not supported by many radio stations
Baalund 5 months ago
@Baalund what radio stations it doesn't support?
FeLiNe418 1 month ago
this vid is 3 years old they all improved now need a new review
E1SUNZ 6 months ago
winamp ftw, its totally awesome and not evil. plus you can do anything you wantt and adapt it to your every whim
landloper1986 7 months ago
foobar2000 + fooPss theme = epic msuic player harun87.deviantart . com/art/fooPss-108019546 remove spaces from the link
Leivonmies 8 months ago
Thanks for making this video, it was very informative and I'm now using foobar2000
NakedAleks 8 months ago
i use itunes to snyc my ipod and thats it, i use foobar for other things becuase it doesn't require any other services and doesn't take up much space, and with the custom layout its great
dahorn100011 9 months ago
I used to use Winamp back on windows 98, and it did the job then, but now its bloatware :(
Itunes is shit.
Foobar2000 is what i use.
CenaTv2 10 months ago
@CenaTv2 Just use the older winamps, you could probably use the new one and modify it in preferences to function like the older versions as well. :3
mewimi 4 months ago
Great video! Very well presented comparison.
MasterTubing 10 months ago
I use Foobar2000 on my laptop as it's a light weight and nice player and Winamp on my main pc. Nice comparison man! And nice accent ;D
orestesangel 1 year ago
so does Foobar enhant the music quality?
drsjohnny 1 year ago
How did you get that stopwatch?
zekeluther 1 year ago
WINAMP 4 LIFE
1SidIcarus1 1 year ago
what about Xion media player
pat20105 1 year ago
I think I'm going to install foobar and get rid if Itunes...ITunes installs so much other crap with it.
Lost4rmZone 1 year ago
just a question ... you added a directory to foobar's playlist NOT the library (as you did in winamp) so basically you just scanned for files ... why didn't you do this in winamp before you say foobar is faster ? (4k+ songs in under a sec :) (under REAL network environment )) and yes ... try not using "new bento skin" but the default one in winamp THEN tell me it loads so damn slow
dshopov 1 year ago
Comment removed
dshopov 1 year ago
1.foobar2000 2.Aimp2 3. some shit like iTunes
W3Guide 1 year ago
you should do Spotify :)
pieyeti21994 1 year ago
awww...what about songbird
LucasRocksFilms 1 year ago
I TUNES IS THE SHIT BECAUSE I HAVE AN IPOD AND I USE IT TO SINK AND IT ORGANIZES EVERYTHING HOW YO WANT IT
marioG211 1 year ago
@marioG211 The combination of your comment and the following in your profile "FOUND A SITE WAY BETTER THAN LOCKERZ COPY AND PASTE THE LINK AND SUBSCRIBE" cements my perception of the average iTunes userl; DUMB.
ALSO CAN U TYPE LOUDER I CANNOT HEAR U YET
FuckingStanz 1 year ago
@FuckingStanz first learn to type then you look at your self and see how much of a looser you are and then you can talk about other ppl
marioG211 1 year ago
@marioG211 Apparently you were too slow to catch onto my emulating your grammar and unneccessary capslock, which had been rendering you retarded. Judging by your less than clever retort/insult, I've come to the conclusion that you are, in fact, inbred.
FuckingStanz 1 year ago
@FuckingStanz hahaha oh wow, thanks for giving me a laugh
Shawtgunner 1 year ago
Aimp2 is the best music player.
vstep 1 year ago
I use Jet Audio because it has perfect sound, also with WIDE effect. This sound is the best I ever heard. Even Winamp with plugins and outputs can't do this sound.
Jet Audio winner.
starteamplus 1 year ago
ok ill be back in 1 second...ok im back guys!
Peon546 1 year ago
It's a huge fucking shame that there is no Foobar for Linux :( I'm stuck with Rythmbox
UnforgivableMen 1 year ago
foobar <3
kovamdrmakavez 1 year ago
mediamonkey is a fav of mine...mostly because i can rename files at the drop of a hat,which comes in handy cause i have a ton of song (both folders and files) that are a mess
mikecrater 1 year ago
What is that tool that u're using as a timer? How does it worx? Thx 4 the future response in advance =)
csfnau 1 year ago
@Netrex44 But when you have it set up the way you want it, use a portable install and move it to Dropbox. 2GB of file space means fb2k and other small open-source programs have more than enough room to grow.
You can also install Dropbox portably on a USB drive with a bit of a hacked copy called DropboxPortable. Go for the older copies if you can find 'em, latest version as of this writing might work for you, but if it doesn't going with something slightly older works as well.
bluephreakr 1 year ago
@bluephreakr hey, got new acc :P
anyways.. I've tried Foobar many times and always thought i'd never learn this program but then one day which was yesterday i played with the program and finally i can see how much better this media player is than winamp and all others..
It's an advanced media player. It's not "out of the box" but that's just cool cos' you can configure it the way you want. I just had trouble doing that from the start :P
NetrexTech 1 year ago
foobar2000 is the best
mitika4ever 1 year ago
Does Fubar have an amp setting like winamp does? That's the only thing that's keeping me from trying it out.
voltz15 1 year ago
@voltz15 Hell of a necropost. But i may as well say, foobar2000 1.0.3 has something called Dolby Headphone Wrapper, which is something for foobar's DSP settings. Enable it by finding a copy of dolbyhph.dll on your PC or online and telling it where it is.
Let's be clear; foo_dsp_dolbyhp.dll goes into your \components folder. dolbyhph.dll stays out of it. Place it in the main directory of your player instead.
The only downer is, foobar does no video. But aside from that, works well as portable.
bluephreakr 1 year ago
naked foobar looks... naked. Try it with fooAvA interface... looks better than the others, obviously display covers and still uses less resources and runs faster than the rest.
Nienormalny 1 year ago
Great review, detailed and fair. I use WMP, but now I'm probably going to get Winamp as it looks like it has a nicer interface.
Never been a fan of iTunes or Foobar2000.
Victorinox99 1 year ago
A short summary afterwards might be nice ;) - maybe a statistics screenshot?
Thx for this!
Chiliem82 1 year ago
Foobar does load Album Covers, you just have to configure the interface correctly. Also, you forgot to mention itunes' Bonjour service which takes quite some resources.
CSstephan 1 year ago
TARANTULA TIME FOR MASSIVE COME SING Y'ALL!!!!!:D nice video:)
longlivewhites 1 year ago
Foobar is the best :)
tysonbb85 1 year ago
Winamp with DFX :-)
1981z28camaro 1 year ago
foobar is the best overall. winamp has too many bugs, itunes is a bloated, intrusive pig, and wmp11 is ok, but i don't like how it sorts songs by artist.
E34BMW535i 1 year ago
The only thing about foobar is that there is no search feature.
squillysk8 1 year ago
There's a component that includes a search function.
ToplessGranny 1 year ago
No need to apologize, you help me make up my mind. Thank you. Oh. You should apologize for having so much rubish music. I saw britney spear a lot of times on your list.
fidely 1 year ago
nice vid man
DCdanis 2 years ago
I like windows media player betterr.. then itunes
ILoveWowWToo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
iTunes FTW, and it beats WMP even better on vista...
Danilko100 2 years ago
you're stupid....it takes a whole 5 seconds more to load than WMP11.
talldude123 2 years ago
@talldude123 Depends on your computer and operating system
rastaxp 2 years ago
Well, most people have a single-core CPU and Windows XP. Most people I know have that setup, including myself.
talldude123 2 years ago
Winamp is alot better, but i was wondering can anyone tell me the best plug in to enhance my winamp5.57? i want to enhance the sound and my system is logitech z5500..any help would be nice, i've read about Enhancer 017..can anyone advise me..thanks.
bagshitass 2 years ago
VLC FTW!!!
sure it isnt the best for just songs. but it plays absolutly anything.
almaster0 2 years ago
I like Winamp much better than WMP and ITunes
TonyRiddles 2 years ago
MediaMonkey guys, seriously.
larebz 2 years ago
check out Xion audio player
XReDDrAGonX21 2 years ago
Ok, don't mark this as spam cus im serious. If you ever get the chance to download "VLC Media Player", I think you would be very impressed. What I do is you VLC to play music and foobar to organize it. Very easy.
squillysk8 2 years ago
Winamp Pr0!
TheMusicTrack 2 years ago
@TheMusicTrack Cracked! lol
No seriously. Everyone I know who has Pro cracked it. If you like Nullsoft, please support them. Wished foobar could support video so I can convert others into using it, since foobar2000, while not the best out of the box allows you to make it whatever the hell you want it to be, musically and graphically.
bluephreakr 1 year ago
I have noticed a problem in AIMP that do not show up in the others.
Instead of playing all the samples to the end, and then looping back to the beginning to play again, in certain situations, it will play to the end and loop to the beginning and play a mix of both the beginning and a section of the end. It's an odd error, but one that does not show up with the other players.
Also, the sound quality is not as good. Something about the harmonics is flat.
It is the only player that shares well.
louisgjordan2 2 years ago
visuals in winamp are breathtaking
stevyainzo 2 years ago 5
and those from WMP suck.
frestylezz 2 years ago
@stevyainzo foobar2000, shpeck plugin, look on the hydrogenaudio forums for foo_vis_shpeck and look at the last few posts as of posting this. If you want a pre-hacked DLL, send me a PM and I'll give it to you, and I even have a guide called Shpeck for Newbies (Yes, a dedicated website for it).
shpeckguide.x10.mx
bluephreakr 1 year ago
Foobar2K 26,636k RAM when playing music
AIMP 5,500 RAM when playing music
AIMP plays 32 bit, high end sounds, and has perfect sharing. I may have found the best player yet. Please include it if you do another comparison.
louisgjordan2 2 years ago
I use AIMP2 as well, but I don't understand what practical difference does 26 MB vs 5 MB make, when we commonly have 2... 4... 8... GB of RAM these days? how often does that 21 MB of saved RAM matter to you?
vibovitold 2 years ago
Wow, look at those stats! Great comparison. I hate it when programs have hidden services running in the background! Foobar2k's lack of services is a huge plus, as well as it's very small footprint, and speed. It would easily be the best sound-ap of all time and probably is, but for sound-programmer's who need to work with powerful, and high-end soundfiles, which both winamp and foobar2k are capable of, Foobar falls short because it does not SHARE. Should have learned that in kindergarten...
louisgjordan2 2 years ago
Winamp is the best media-player by far. It plays many formats, including 32 bit, high-bitrate soundfiles, which WMP does not, and it is very fast.
Foobar2k is equally as good as Winamp, and has the same advantages and power with one big exception. Foobar2000 does not share the soundfile that it's playing. This is a major drawback for me, a sound-programmer. Another flaw is that it's programmer is impossible to contact. WMP just does not compete in the power arena.
louisgjordan2 2 years ago
Good, I like winamp.
pinturaz 2 years ago
This may seem like a stupid question but why are you using a Virtual Machine?
sammyd1993 2 years ago
winamp! you can even make the visualization your desktop background and awesome skins and tons of them, and also been alive for years!
astigpat13 2 years ago
winamp is the best period!
TheTexanAtheist 2 years ago
And I say Foobar is the best, period!
:P
IzzySM 2 years ago 2
It depends what os you are operating too. like itunes will run faster if you are using mac osx. that goes with wmp11 if you are running vista etc. So it really depends on the os
KRUMP274 2 years ago
i think foobar work very fast on both man :P
thehobbsslayer 2 years ago
you forget VLC
CriminalMonkey 2 years ago
hes using the modern winamp skins?
that really slows it down
BassGoesBoom1 2 years ago
the cool thing about winamp though is it can play pretty much ANY kind of media file you can think of. winamp is great for live streaming too. as he said it opens faster if you just leave the agent alone.
EpsilonKnight2 2 years ago
you're crap
Just kidding
GGfpc 2 years ago
Very educational... thanks.
Justnorthofjustice 2 years ago
Aimp2 would be the best player for sound quality, its equal or a bit better than xm player.
crissxxx 2 years ago
FooBar2000 Is overall better than anything on the free software exchange.
Honorsucks 2 years ago
foobar2000 FTW!
ankitpasi1 2 years ago 2
real player 11, im not calling you crap but im just saying real player sp is a grate media thingy as well
YomorokaXD 2 years ago
foobar2000 smart joyce
BrerRa66it 2 years ago 9
Microsoft has improved wmp. Wmp 12 is very stable and faster than wmp 12. Foobar is also another good choice for media playing software.
foxstriker10 2 years ago
i know this starts sort of like a cheesy commercial ;) but well. like most ppl, i was a long time winamp user - once i tried foobar i switched. it's more convenient. it provides multiple playlist support (tabbed). it's easily customizable (you don't have to hunt for some buggy plugins). it has a built-in media library. it allows you to perform file operations (e.g. copying all the songs into one folder) - by a couple of clicks. i can't list all the features here... i recommend it 100%.
vibovitold 2 years ago
i may be wrong but my impression is that winamp is the equivalent of internet explorer - the majority people who stick with it, have never simply tried any alternative
vibovitold 2 years ago
what is better for better music and quility
princeryuma 2 years ago
Foobar2000 with ASIO is the best.
OjStudios 2 years ago
Comment removed
crissxxx 2 years ago
VLC Media Player is cool, too.
Voovux 2 years ago
Foobar2000
Juninho8Slo 2 years ago
:O Trantula by Pendulum
illage2 2 years ago
I use Foobar because I don't need to look at it...it's for music!
obbytoo 2 years ago 34
amen!
JustCloudless 2 years ago
Agree'd
Weeeman5872 2 years ago
@obbytoo actually you are forced to look at it when you change the song AND watch exactly what are you doing to NOT mess your playlist :) while in winamp you just send it to tray and forget about it (true hotkeys ftw)
dshopov 1 year ago
Winamp just looks better, and it's fast at adding music too (Foobar was faster because like he said it doesn't add album art)
Winamp is easier to use as well, has some cool features, good skins, and you can use the DFX audio plugin, which is amazing, and the other programs other than Windows Media Player can't use that program, so I would say Winamp is the best one.
1981z28camaro 2 years ago 2
get more ram and a faster comp stop bitching.
houleagain9048 2 years ago
@houleagain9048 Not everyone has the money for it, or the space. Myself, I use a craptop. It's a single core that's begun to choke on everything because I have too much shit running on it at once, lol
bluephreakr 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com ukdhj
SterlingSadler 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice try. Keep it up check out esteembpo + com for social media marketing. cxc
DoloresTripp 2 years ago
Tried Foobar twice before, over the years, hated it for the terrible UI. Had to use Foobar again recently to do some format conversions, noticed how nice everything sounded. Then AB'ed with wmp and iTunes which has the awsomest UI, but in the end it's the sound that matters. Now the only thing I can to listen to is Foobar. Wmp and iTunes sound same, that is, crappy.
I use JBL LSR32's. Decent, by ANY standard.
WinAmp may sound good with the right setup, but Foobar sounds great out of the box.
moot2000 2 years ago
@moot2000 Dolby Headphone Wrapper, and Columns UI or PanelsUI if you want to revamp the look.
bluephreakr 1 year ago
And my Winamp (newest ^^) uses only about 14mb ram! :D
Mibmu 2 years ago
I'm using Winamp in the classic theme, takes less RAM, CPU and stuff...=P
Mibmu 2 years ago
I prefer Winamp to all the other ones.
NightmareX151 2 years ago
foobar2000 is a superior application in every respect.
mstram24 2 years ago 2
@mstram24 Except for video. Once video comes along, fb2k may be the iTunes AND Winamp killer.
bluephreakr 1 year ago
If you have a lot of music and like your music tags, then Foobar is for you. I have been using it for a couple years now and though there is a learning curve it isn't as large as some would say. Just learn it little by little.
AlbedoAtoned 2 years ago
fb2k has a library feature and album art. You make it look like a POS. You can also change the layout of the GUI to suit your needs to almost any way you want. I think you poorly reviewed fb2k in my opinion.
dugger0 2 years ago
WinAmp - cool dude at the bar drinking a scotch and wearing a leather jacket.
WMP - looks pretty normal but has a livesize poster of Josef Fritzl above his bed.
VideoLan (VLC) - lol what are you doing here, do you even have an equalizer?
iTunes - glossy, fat, insecure transvestite.
foobar2000 - Chuck Norris.
AppA 2 years ago 17
I switched from iTunes to Winamp yesterday, and it's much better, foobar2000 looks like it has awesome speed and resource usage, but I couldn't figure it out.
PsycoticaKamikaze 2 years ago
Make another comparation with jetAudio 7.
A0TP 2 years ago
Thanks, great vid!
I think I'm going to stick with winamp for now.. like it!
LIEHIEZE 2 years ago
Even though I own a laptop that can handle many of the heavier stuff out there, I still always get the lightest weight players. I originally was a winamp guy for years, and then I started noticing that winamp was becoming buggier and bloated. I switched to foobar and never looked back. Winamp just went down the drain when AOL brought the rights to nullsoft. :(
videoslacker 2 years ago
maybe it starts faster but your comp makes it longer, I dont know^^
mikimiki95 2 years ago
great video thanks for sharing
wine2805 2 years ago
nice video ...
pivovinorakija 2 years ago
LOL, all the things mentioned are really not important on a mediaplayer.
it's all about usabilty, songbird tries but fails in the longrun, but iTunes is by far the best player.
MIGHTYcbu 3 years ago
ITunes......lol that's the worst. Well. Its the worst if you have been using computers say before the year 2000. People these days can't seem to cope without programs with "libraries" that hide directory structure of there HDD from them. As the concept of such a thing is too hard for people these days. The amount of times I get asked by someone where their 5GB music collection actually is when they want to backup because they have no idea.....
CmdrTobs 2 years ago
Nice video. Traditionally, I'm not a big fan of Microsoft; BUT, I have to say Windows Media Player 11 is so much more responsive than iTunes 7. The 'gapless' feature that Apple introduced into iTunes 7 completely destroyed the player, making it slow and bulky. I haven't tried Foobar yet, but I'll give it a try.
napone0 3 years ago 2
Awesome video. It was very informative. I just wish you had included JetAudio in the comparison. Maybe next time?
goofynewfie72 3 years ago
Itunes = Big steaming pile of cow shit.
Xplodz 3 years ago 6
winamp pro is great
eneakume 3 years ago
i am so getting foobar2000 for my intel atom netbook now....
ThatKidKyle 3 years ago
itunes is the best but too slow when have much music
666TheMasterGod666 3 years ago
Um no. Itunes is the worst. Following windows media player.
omid11 3 years ago 3
Wow.. I'm going to install Foobar now.
FatNation 3 years ago
foobar is my favorite, i really use itunes just for my ipod, and ill play songs on there if its already up, and wmp11 is fine if you dont want to install anymore players
Jr4594 3 years ago
crap or something like that :p
No just joking nice video :D
alililiff 3 years ago
MPC FOR VIDEOS
xxuglymexx 3 years ago
foobar is the best for music, for videos id either use vlc or just install a codec pack and use windows media player
Jr4594 3 years ago
im gAnna try out foobar is its the lightest.
khara4life09 3 years ago
If you are smart, and geeky . _____ PLZ use foobars. sure it's complex and hard to program. But it can be your best player, because You can actually design how it looks and how it plays.
ziweiwu 3 years ago
thats exactly what i love about it, you could choose to only show what you want
Jr4594 3 years ago
you forgot VLC
lolesossp 3 years ago
that winamp 8 sec startup is bull... on classic (ie no themes) its as fast as the others...
chaos8092 3 years ago
you should have done a review on Appeal (or how attractive it is)
arronhunt 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
well i have a mac with itunes, so screw you all! xD
xoxkillerdollxox 3 years ago
Great replacement for iTunes which can import the database from iTunes is Songbird by Mozilla.
Finally you can uninstall iTunes and still have all your statistics etc...
mabo1980 3 years ago
Winamp ftw
exozero 3 years ago
Sorry ipod fanfags everything beats itunes by a LONGSHOT.
Xplodz 3 years ago
great review. my i tunes takes a HELL of a lot longer to load, at least 15 seconds. but then again i do have over 20GB of music. thanks
manicaldan13 3 years ago
Give musikCube a try.
mikae1 3 years ago
You mentioned that foobar2000 "might not show all the album artwork". Not true, it will show all the album artwork that your files are tied to automatically after importing.
pyrogamer 3 years ago
WMP 11 is a good player, even when im multitasking pretty hard, no locking up or crashing, it's pretty stable. I use REAL from time to time but WMP is what i use from time to time. I havent used WINAMP for a couple of years but i experienced no problems with it either.
daeladub 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
WMP 11 FTW
silverstonewebcam 3 years ago
Takes me 7 seconds to start WMP 11 on memory hog Vista.
LessthanJake14 3 years ago
takes me only .67 secs on vista....and ive 2 GB ram and core 2 duo 2.0 GHZ..ssoooo dont call vista a hog its completely fine
silverstonewebcam 3 years ago
Foobar2000 is honest to god the best music player I have ever used. I don't need 10,000 visualisations, because it's usually running in the backround (never using more than 20mb of RAM). I have customized it more so than I could ever do with any of the other players. I can skin it too, but what's the point? All I might do is change the background color.
Anyways, typical computer users use typical programs. Enjoy your WHY COMPUTER STOP RUNNING WHEN I MAKE SONG SING?
demonikreaper 3 years ago 2
FOOBAR FTW
djtheextremegamerpro 3 years ago 2
cheapo
DatNarutoKid 3 years ago
DatNarutoKid.
First of all, LOL at your name.
Secondly, your username says a lot about you.
I am guessing you use windows vista home premium, probably an emachines package deal for under $800, and you are probably also under the age of 14, and know little about computers.
demonikreaper 3 years ago 4
man lol my firefox is 3 times the itunes for ram. But i usually always have 4 or more tabs open.
Good video.
pimpstenator 3 years ago
Try using Opera. It takes a bit to get used to, but is overall better.
demonikreaper 3 years ago 2
I love Opera, except for the built in Bit Torrent. I prefer uTorrent and am forced to use a different browser, temporarily, to download torrentss.
Mhoomba 3 years ago
No, actually, not at all.
I will message you in a second.
demonikreaper 3 years ago
to download torrents from opera with utorrent:
tools -> preferences -> advanced -> downloads -> uncheck "hide files opened with opera" -> quickfind -> type "torrent" -> select it -> edit -> check "open with default application" and select the uTorrent .exe. i know demonikreaper has probably answered already...just ~sharing the info~ :D
ladynumberfour4 3 years ago
you can disable the builtin utorrent, im using utorrent with opera myself.
decemi 3 years ago
Foobar2000 0.9.4.5 is superior to all the new versions when it comes to ram. Workes just as great. :) 30 000 songs in playlist and playing=10 MB in ram. Minimized=3 MB.
StefConEnterprises 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
YOU'RE CRAP.
jk, good video. :)
PhoeniXCE 3 years ago