"More" Meteorologists?! Why not try climatologists and not just the ones that skeptics have FOUND who disagree but ones who have actually published peer reviewed studies.
Well the thing we learned in the big scandal of the climate gate and the leaked emails from the CRU is that the peer review process is not really an peer review process at all, but is rife with fraud, deceit, and collaborative efforts to prevent others from publishing views that did not agree. The leaked emails very clearly show this cooperation and efforts among scientists to prevent differing views from being published. So that peer review process you speak of is now dishonest and corrupted.
"More" Meteorologists?! Why not try climatologists and not just the ones that skeptics have FOUND who disagree but ones who have actually published peer reviewed studies.
Skydancer365 2 years ago 2
Well the thing we learned in the big scandal of the climate gate and the leaked emails from the CRU is that the peer review process is not really an peer review process at all, but is rife with fraud, deceit, and collaborative efforts to prevent others from publishing views that did not agree. The leaked emails very clearly show this cooperation and efforts among scientists to prevent differing views from being published. So that peer review process you speak of is now dishonest and corrupted.
Albertkallal 2 years ago
Well... You actually need Meteorologists, not physicists from other fields to make proper climate models.
Finlandcitizen 1 year ago
Amazing! Some common sense at last. It's the WEATHER!!!!!!!!!
Geefor 3 years ago 3