So how do we know that the makers of this video didn't play around with the original video images in order to come up with the basis for this video???
Few, if any people, died on 911 Who hasn't seen 3000 missing for the Social Sercurity Death list? If 3000 died, there should have been 9000 on the 911 01 death list. There were only 6000 listed deaths, which means 3000 fakes were made up for the 911 MEGA RITUAL, day of MASSIVE insurance FRAUD. Who has not looked into Gelitin, The B-Thing or World Views art students who lived in WTC1 & 2 primarily on floors 91 & 92 from 1997 to 2001. There were no businesses in the top WTC. Do your homework.
The plane graphic was a PVI VIRTUAL MEDIA SERVICES graphic insertion. It was a graphic, it wasn't real. If you don't know anything about VIRTUAL insertion, go to Sportvision. Sportvision & ESPN2 bought PVI from Cablevision in 12/2010. I will post a PVI virtual media video so that you can see how easy & seamlessly a graphic can be inserted. At Sportvision's website you can see lots of samples of inserting graphics into live video with the PVI LVIS computer.
Whenever I think of Mike Walter's description I think of a slinky. It just sort of went boooooing and folded up. A slinky or an accordion, something cartoon like.
@johnh173 yes we should if this was just about some freakin money, of which has no actual gold-standard value anymore in this country, then alot of people died in vein. And for those who caused this catastrophe...well, karma's a bitch
Oh no,it has nothing to do with money.It is all about control.9/11 was orchestrated with sole intention of generating sufficient amount of hatred towards muslim world so that war in Iraq can take place and that Israel can continue to rape Palestinian nation.Next stage is Codex Alimentarius whose role is to criminalize vitamins and natural supplements-anything that is cheap and very good for you so that pharma companies can sell you 'the cure' when you go ill.
@blowndesert if that's the true reasons that this whole event happened...then that's pretty sad. Coming from a home where my dad is a firefighter, I feel for the families who might have lost their firefighting dads or moms, husbands or wives, who might have died in vain :/
He says the wings of the jet folded back, so they now build jets with hinges that makes it possible for wings to fold back and stay connected to plane, ok, ameriduuuh full of shit.
As much proof and as obvious that this was set up , it wont ever matter. The Govt controls what people think. if it's not important then it wont ever effect them. Look how quickly we went to war based on their word, yet look how fast they are to provide real proof. I mean come on, we have a new leader and yet they never looked into it.
I appreciate that you are open minded person... there was only one outcome out of this.. that OBL was declared as a person behind the act very soon within minutes...what else left from giving a war to afghanistan...
About that white plane at 1 hr 2 mins: In many cultures over time, people have reported seeing a white bird or (recently) white plane flying near the area where a person or persons have died. The theory is that these are angels (maybe) who are collecting the souls of the dead. I saw that plane too in the live TV coverage & I'm now convinced that it's one of those supernatural vehicles.
That was not an airplane that hit. It was a demonic being morphed as an airplane. Watch 4:44 to 4:45 and you'll see that the lower wing is split in half, like a wishbone from a turkey. Also, when its head comes out the other end, you can see it's body arching up behind it.
WOW. Incredible. Yet people just jump on the wagon and call people crazy and offensive for not believing the "official" story/report. All people in doubt need to see this and rethink some stuff. I do not believe the governments changing, fabricated story for one second.
Research the insider trading and it'll become fairly obvious who benefited from 9/11...follow the money. I suppose that could be of little practical significance though...Great video, this might be the last video I would recommend to someone just getting into 9/11, but once you get your bearings this is the most important video. Thank you for you work Simon.
So I don't really agree with this idea of 9/11 being a set up but, I am open minded person. So I have a question to anyone that can answer it in a logical way. Why would our government do this to us? How do we as a country or even them benefit in any way?
Have you read the bloomberg report on the real 2008 financial bailout at 7.7 trillion -11 x tarp. This allowed a small group of elite bankers to steal hundreds of billions from you - and not one criminal conviction. Meanwhile the debt goes from 9 to 15 trillion in the last 3 years? It is well established that your government does not work for you or care about you. Several senators (ex. Dennis Kucinich) want to reinvestigate 911 - we should support their efforts.
11 master occultists, masons, kabbalists-zionists & witches were each in his/her assigned spot for the 911 megaritual: Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Bush's sorcerer aunt Cappelletti, Bill Gates, il duce Giuliania, Condi Rice, Schwarzenegger, Silverstein, Soros & Saddam Hussein, not dead, self-proclaimed incarnation of Nebuchandnezzer who knows the ancient Sumerian secrets of turning gold into monoatomic gold for antigravity vehicles & DNA replenishing elixir. See Jim Marrs Lecture series on monoatic gold
It is called 'control'.'Problem-reaction-solution',very simple.They had to scare you into giving most of your human rights in the name of 'war on terror'.The world as we know it has never been the same since 9/11.Every step you make,what you eat,what time you go to bed,what you have for breakfast,everything is monitored,all in the name of 'war on terror' friend.Days of ignorance are over,time to wake up.Watch 'Seeds of deception' by Jeffrey Smith to start with.
Also notice that at 3:44, the camera just happens to "zoom in" just in time to catch the second plane hit almost as if they knew what was about to happen.How conveniently coincidental (sarcasm)
Notice at 3:48 the "nose" of the plane comes right out of the other side of the building intact after crashing all the way through a steel and concrete building.I didn't know the nose of an "aluminum jet was that strong, in fact, what I've always heard in my lifetime was that the nose of a jet is one of the weakest parts of the jet.
You do realise you have disproved your own main theory about the Nose of the plane flying through the 2nd tower and the broadcasters then blacking the screen @ the 0.23.28 mark right? You can clearly see the nose of the plane here too, it wasn't a hoax at all IMO and its disrespectful of you to try to prove so, this is coming from an unbaised Irishman with no connection to 9/11 or America for that matter.
@homersimpsonIRL This is not my work, you need to take your concerns up with 'simonshack'.
However it is disrespectful to blissfully accept the governments official report given what is and what is not in it. That Evan Fairbanks video you speak of was released some time after the events of 9/11 as were most of the others and if faked would have been done in a way so not to contradict the live nose out shot mistake.
@homersimpsonIRL It appears to me, they are trying to cover up the nose of the drone or missile that made it through to the other side. Which is clearly a different shape than that of the alleged planes that hit. So of course you'd be able to see it from the 23.28 angle too. I don't know what's real anymore though. But I don't believe the US Government's story to be 100% truth.
@homersimpsonIRL put your respect / disrespect aside. No real planes hit the WTC, it was all CGI digital manipulation that you have been deceived with. You can try to argue against the evidence that proves this all you want, but it doesn't change the truth.
@homersimpsonIRL I think you misunderstand what is meant by "hoax". All the footage we have seen, either broadcast live or "shot by amateurs" and then released to the media... we saw is what they WANTED us to see. The "hoax" is that the media manipulated the footage to make it look like something it wasn't. Witnesses report not seeing planes but only seeing/hearing explosions. If I had a loved one died in 9/11, I would want to know the ENTIRE truth, not the convenient truth.
This is what people should be watching, none of the other documentaries that just explain things in talk most people don't understand, but still pretend they're experts on it
[re CNN feed] You make a great deal of assumptions in your analysis. I've shown you alternate rational explanations to your CNN broadcast analysis [at start of vid] of the impact of Flight 175 into WTC2. My 2nd point can easily explain the brief video blackout experienced by ALL broadcasters receiving their signal fm WTC1 when Fl 175 hit WTC2.
The success of a any hypothesis, is how well it measures up to critical analysis.
We tend to see what we obsessively want, even if it's not really there.
@MelioraCogito People really do not want to even entertain the notion that their Newsmedia is participating in the fabrication of world events. It throws their entire perception of reality into question and they will fight tooth and nail to avoid that situation.
WE MAY OBSERVE THAT: Winston’s mic/phone picks up ambient sound BUT NO EXPLOSION
As stated before, Winston is standing at the base of WTC1 on the north side. His immediate area is full of emergency vehicles with engines running. His LOS with WTC2 is limited if not wholly obscured by WTC1. News broadcast/cel phone mic’s are unidirectional: they are sensitive to sound fm one direction only. The explosion occurs 80 stories above & around the corner from him. Ergo no BOOM! in audio.
WE MAY OBSERVE THAT: SCREEN BLACKS OUT on impact (8 black frames)
The top floors of WTC1 was a beehive of broadcast & utility radio equip incl repeaters, microwave, analog & digital TV transmitters; incl backup gens. 6 of 8 NY area TV stns [WPIX, WCBS, WNBC, WABC, WNET, WWOR] used WTC1 to broadcast to the NY/NJ area – the live broadcasts that day were being transmitted via equip in WTC1! The reception loss resulted fm WTC1 experiencing the blast wave fm Fl 175’s impact of WTC2.
@MelioraCogito i understand what you are saying ... BUT i have a question about the collapse.... How did we have live footage from helicopters etc.. of the collapse of both buildings? if your theory is correct. .we would have lost everything and been blacked out until a suitable solution was available.... no?
WE MAY OBSERVE THAT: NO ONE sees or mentions "plane"
Could it be the CNN host is NOT watching his monitor at the time Flight 175 enters the view before hitting WTC2 < 2 sec later? Winston confirmed he's standing on the NORTH side of WTC1 – WTC2 is very likely, NOT in his LOS (line-of-sight). Furthermore, at the time Fl 175 hits WTC2 [fm south side], he's looking up the north face of WTC1 to judge the size of the hole created by Fl 11. No "plane" because no one saw it. (cont)
@thepossessor you can make numbers do whatever you want them to do tbh... and why did the "8 and 1" need to be added from the 18but not the "1 and 1" from the 11... do research instead of stupid math
One small thing people haven't picked up on are the 'downed' light poles near the p3ntag0n. They convinced us with a simulation that wings of a passenger jet were strong enough to hit steel poles at 500+mph and not get sliced through. It would have been easy to put small charges on the retaining bolts at the base of the poles and set them off in synchro with the missile attack.
@caxtonman I've seen a video (forgot the name, unfortunately) of interviews with like 10 random people (None knew each other) that said the plan flew nowhere near those posts. They were all asked to draw on a map where the plane flew. Every single person matched to within 2-3 of each other for the entire flight path until it pulled up and flew OVER the Pentagon. The official story is BS.
While the media lied to us, not all intentionally, Peter Jennings knew as much as you and I, But such as he were fed lies. While their is suspect video, like Mikael Hezarkhani. And odd witnesses like Mike Walters.NOT All The Witness and Video of the 2nd Impact Are Lies. The video is consistent. Nano Thermite is in all dust samples. Something hit the WTC, it Looks like a Boeing. But it's no Boeing. Therein lies the truth. Nano Thermite is part of the truth. But reducing all video to lies is wrong
Two skyscrapers pancake from fire in the upper stories for the first time in the history of skyscrapers? Bldg 7 pancakes hours later? There is so much evidence that we allowed this.. by planes which I believe.. and a missile at the Pentagon and WE shot down the PA flight. Any fighter pilot will tell you he could not have managed flying so low to the ground and not flipping from the ground interference even flying a fighter jet! In PA not even a drop of DNA anywhere acc. to the Medical Examiner!
Not possible to fly an aircraft that size 500mph that low to ground and be so accurate and not hit the ground Violates physics. Where are the bodies and wreckage? If fireball was so intense they brought down towers, why wasn't this fireball so whimpy? Grass not even burned. ??? Yeah... Right. This is all a hoax, people.
I think the darkness of the plane is the angle at which it was flying. It was most likely shaded byt the tower itself, the side of the tower it was flying on is, after all, in shadow. And pointing out the building in the sunlight doesn't really make a case because judging from the surrounding buildings, the one pointed to seems to be far to the right of the plane, which would put it right in the sunlight while the plane remains in the shadow of the tower. Basically I think that video makes sense
all this seems to make sense but, and ill just count my ignorance in to this next question: how do we explain all the tickets bought and the lives dissapearing on all of the flights on sep. 11th? i dont know much im trying to figure out more, there were four planes supposedly right flight 93, the pentagon, and both towers, how do we explain where the people went when family members and friends probably know that certain people were flying in those planes and they died?
@ABeastApproaches If you watch "the zeitgeist full movie" not the addendum. That might help explain what happened to the passengers of these planes. I wonder sometimes too.....we live in a very sad time.
Those shots of twin towers are unusually blurry. These are network cameras mounted on helicopters, you'ld assume they would be of high quality but many of the amature videos have better detail than the chopper cams. another strange thing on 9/11.
The first time i saw this , i went out and told everyone i knew that there was no plane and they looked at me as if i was crazy . For years it bothered me that these "planes" from the 911 clips were definitely not real , yet 2 people whom i told said they were there and SAW it happen , ???. I didn't delve as intensely into 911 again for years ; it's only last week that i saw a video called Project Bluestream that seems to put the pieces together, saying they were holographic projections .
There would not even have been an investigation if it had not been for the Family's of the 9/11 victims. The FAA should have tried to piece together these airplanes. As for the Investigations that they had, they all read like comic books. The NIST report did not even use high school science in their investigations. The FBI report is a joke and in fact numerous comedians have made money using the FBI 9/11 report alone as their material. At the very least new Independent Investigations are needed.
this is way to complicated to even bother to think to fake something like that...it s easier to crash real planes. all i am just saying is that the planes really crashed in towers, at pentagon maybe a missle and surely US goverment knew about the attacks and did nothing. i think my oppinion it s more plausible, in fact it matches in US history...it s almost a tradition.
@simandicos Do you not think it would be easier to fake the images rather than have two airliners flown into the wtc with pin point accuracy? The risk of having a plane miss its target would have been just too much given how difficult it would have been at that speed and altitude. I'm not a ''no planer'' but fairly certain the images are not real. I'm more inclinated to believe that remotely operated drones were used.
@TheRangersLegend if an UAV can take off and land by itself, i think that technology can be assembled on an airliner ....but to set up a scam like this in wich so many things can go wrong...i think the men who u think of thought to do that are smart enough not to take the chance to ruin it so easely. i repeat...in my oppinion the american intelligence closed eyes in front of incoming attack and just stood there and watched the show.
@TheRangersLegend Lol, if the US sacrificed thousands of lives pulling off this conspiracy as you would see it, why the hell would they care about the risk of the planes missing their targets?? And what about all the people that filmed it on cameras in the streets, are they all gov't pawns as well? Where were you on 9/11? I happened to be right across the river and my mother was on her way to work when the second plane hit and she witnessed it.
@TesticularRainbows How would they have been able to explain the building collapses if the planes missed there target? If you were there and seen it with your own eyes and were able to identify exactly what hit the towers than thats great. But from what I have seen and read I have yet to come across a testimony from anyone who could make a positive identification. My opinions do not support a 'no plane' theory and never have done.
There's pretty good motive for all these producers and executives too. Ratings for their channels probably quadrupled and everyone in the country became either part of the CNN watching camp or Fox News watching camp for the next two years.
HOLY COW! JUST FOR SOME ROTTEN DINOSAUR C**P! THE ILLUMINATI PLANNED IT ALL! FOR MORE INFO, GO TO: "FARHKHAN501". HE HAS VIDS OF HOW THE ILLUMINATI "PLAN" THESE SORT OF ATTACKS. PLEASE LIKE SO EVERYONE CAN SEE!!
There have bn experiments were psychologists/psychiatrists have bn able to convince individuals that certain childhood memories have happened to them that in reality have not. The technique's used are repetition and apparent confirming testimony from credible sources to the individuals involved (although the credible people were just going along with the experiment).
You would be surprised how easy it is to influence someone into thinking anything (within reason) is real or factual, even huge c
Well researched and presented, it offers a dimension I had not considered yet but in the end it only adds to the numerous questions this whole event brings up. When I watched the planes crashing into the towers in 2001 it just didn't feel right. I can't prove it but it was a gut feeling that this situation had been tampered with. I have never lost that initial doubt.
how did they fake the planes on every media outlet's camera footage? also every civilan's video footage, and what about all the witnesses at the scene who saw it live and in 3 D?
@loosechangeexposed I'm not here to give you the answers but as described in the film almost each and every one of the released footage are creditied to persons withing the world of media and audio editing. Also for every witness who claims to see the planes they cannot identify them as AA or UA aircraft and just as many witnesses fail to see any plane or have quoted miltary aircraft or even missiles.
@TheRangersLegend I don't believe the official story, but honestly, I would consider angular reflection as a possible cause of the "matrix" shots. Why not, since both the buildings have large glass panes? This might also explain why it's out of flight path, as well as why it appears on 5 different shots. Don't think this is conclusive evidence.
@TheRangersLegend it's all in what you choose to believe, example: conspiracy theorists say that April Gallop (who was at the pentagon) never saw a plane (assuming that there was no plane but a missile), turns out that she was looking at her computer monitor, of course she never saw a plane, she wasn't looking, but she also never said she saw a missile. just because people said they couldn't identify the planes does not mean there were not people who could.
@loosechangeexposed I don't choose to believe anything......I'm just looking at the info and building an opinion on that. The fact remains that hardly anyone, regardless of what the official report states, could not visually identify the aircrafts and also have very little evidence of their very existence.
@TheRangersLegend there are way more videos of people who said they saw a plane hit the so. tower (everybody at the scene was looking at the no. tower while the so. tower was hit) then there are videos of people who were there and said they doubt it was a plane that hit the south tower, just because they did not identify what airline the plane was from does not prove they did not see a plane, show me 1 video of an at the scene witness who said there was no plane. show me just 1 video of that.
@loosechangeexposed I never said people didn't see planes but rather they would not have been able to identify them. I'm not in the no plane mindset despite what the documentaries viewpoint is although there are many videos, quotes etc of people not seeing, or hearing, planes approaching. Whatever explanation for that is I do not know.
of all the people who filmed the so. tower being hit by the plane, why is there not 1 video of the so. tower exploding without a plane in the shot? where is any evidence backing up your claim? did the government retreave every video from people who they did not know would be filming too? if what you claim is true then there would be 1 video filmed without a plane in the shot that the government would have missed. so why did it never turn up?
@loosechangeexposed You ask if the government retrieved every video? Do you know of a single original VHS or even a roll of film of 9/11 that exists today? Every frame of 9/11 imagery has been filtered through NIST or some other agency.
It is entirely feasible to use electronic jamming devices to block real amateur cameramen in the area. Not saying this is what happened, but it would solve the problem easily.
But regardless of these questions, the planes are still obviously animations.
I didn't get to watch the whole thing, but what happened to the flights, and people on the flights that did go missing after takeoff? Apparently these people made phone calls to loved ones - can someone explain this? Thanks..
@elwoodjoey88 It is very simple to create fake victim identities, fake phone calls, fake flight plans, etc. Have you ever considered that the "thousands of people died" story is completely made up? Search for the 'VicSim Report', or 'Did 3,000 people really die on 9/11' ?
These are questions the popular 9/11 "truthers" will attack you for asking. I wonder why?
if the government was able to somehow fake the planes at the WTC on live t.v., other people's personal videos, and infront of the 1000's who witnessed it live at the scene, then how come they didn't edit a video at the pentagon with a plane using CGI? if they planned it out they could have had a video already edited and released it to the media moments after the pentagon was hit.
@loosechangeexposed because if they did it would have to show a 757 taking the manoeuvres as stated in their official report. Which would just look rediculous and even more less believable. The frames they did release does show what appears to be a trail from a missile. My guess it was hit by a small military aircraft which fired a missile just moments prior to impact. Many witnesses recall a 'fly by' of a 757 or something similar. The wtc's were the focus of the deception in my opinion.
@TheRangersLegend the video they did release only showed the impact point and about 300 feet before it, it would have been easy for them to simply make it look like a plane was in the shot, my video "loose change answer number 053" explains the pentagon. the plane was on a hard right bank then went into a hard left bank just before impact, it was the left wing tip in the shot, many people said they never saw a plane (cuz they weren't looking) none of them said they saw a missile.
@loosechangeexposed they didn't do a pentagon CGI video because they wanted to use the pentagon as a red herring. And it worked, many "9/11 truth" camps focused primarily on missiles hitting the pentagon and used lack of video as their evidence. Doing this also helps hide their ability to use CGI.
Mike Walter Eye's keeps looking to the right as if he's in a nervous position ..Look at his body language , he's acting !! The Mans Full Of Shit if you ask me..
@gtechie if your comments been censored it means it has contained abuse. I don't tolerate it on any of the documentaries I have uploaded and encourage reasonable debate. If you disagree with something and want to express that then please do it within the guidelines and include any evidence you may have that contradicts the information shown.
I remember someone had claimed there was a building missing on the skyline of New York. I have no idea what the skyline should look like . Does anyone remember that claim and what buildling it was. They traveled over in different areas and could not get information as to "where"' some of the people with cameras were taking their shots in order to "miss" this building.
2) hole in pentagon to smal for a plane, the fact that exact area had just been reinforced, no debris, no clear video release of the 'plane?' hitting when they have confiscated many. 3) the flight in pennsylvania the corroner said there was no point him being there as there were no bodies and no blood!!! 4) building 7 is a joke, it had no reason to come down i dont care what anyone says, 5) There is far more compelling evidence I urge non believers to look. The truth needs to come out.
mass murder that day!!! My family knows a police woman from england (im in the uk) that was working there that day and she says she knows for a fact 1000s more died then what has been disclosed. When you look at all the evidence the whole thing is laughable. So to those who refuse to accept a cover up i would say do your reseach first and you will be suprised and shocked! for one the fact that mobiles couldnt work on planes back then but miraculosly did on that day, which has been proven,
Great documentary. For 10 years I believed the attacks were real and I assumed all the conspiracy theories were regarding an alien attack |(for some reason) until I came across a 911 film, forget what it was called, and it certainly opened my eyes. I had no idea before just how many holes there were in the supposed true story,I have now done a lot of research on the subject and I believe 100% that it is a cover up. I'm not sure if it was missiles or planes but I know the governemt committed
The majority of video fakers & dodgy witnesses have Jewish names, faces, or both. Meanwhile, major media is indisputably Jewish-owned. So the same ones who created a "6 million killed" lie to illicitly empower themselves created a new "3 thousand" lie for new obscene power. (And notice how they did it in NEW YORK.) They waited to get their hands on the levers of U.S. military power. Now Israel covertly expands using the 9-11 lie, taking over the Middle East, the Gentiles as their stomping golem.
33:21 watch he says tower two, then gut cuts him "looks like a hollywood movie" looks down at paper work , then corrects tower 1 tower 1...lol, it was a script
One of my favorite parts is the differing colors of the sky in the various networks' news footage. That's something I sorta subconsciously noted when I watched old videos, even before I started doubting the official story. I was there that day, it was a perfect late summer day. Blue skies, a few billowy clouds, warm but not hot. It wasn't an orangy/gray hazy day as if it was 98 degrees in the middle of August.
@superblol1 Could be just a news helicopter. There's also several videos out there that show a third plane flying up and away from the towers around the time of the impact. It's hard to tell in the "mystery plane" videos how far that plane is from the towers (and conversely how close it might be to JFK or LaGuardia) although I thought it looks like it was flying right over Manhattan and not Queens. Anyway, that's my opinion.
for people who trust facts more than emotion this is a fantastic documentary, ive seen it a dozen times orso. for the mass its like trying to convice a catholic that the bible is a fairytale, impossible , people cant think for themselves anymore
I will admit, I was caught up in the emotion of 9/11 when it happened, I'm naturally emotional! But also have a scientific mind, and I remember the very moment I started to doubt what was being reported. When I saw the 'evidence' of the alleged terrorists - barely undamaged passports and a bandana (what an insult to anyone's intelligence) - my bullshit radar engaged. Great documentary, It's a shame most people don't look at all of this with a modicum of common sense
@thekweewee I remember thinking, how did they come up with Osama Bin Laden so fast....and how the plane virtually disappears into the building before the explosion....
Nice work on this video. If you look at the footage at 1.24.33 you can see smoke rising from the base of one of the towers prior to its collapse. The location of the source of the smoke is obstructed by a television screen banner. Check it out people.
Strange, the planes that hit the WTC towers must have been created from different materials than the one that hit the pentagon since the wings cut right into the towers like a hot knife through butter and the wings folded back from hitting the pentagon. Hmmm... From what I know, Boeing uses the same manufacturing process in each of it's 7x7 series airframes.
Go back to bed, America. Your government has figured out how it all transpired. Go back to bed, America. Your government is in control again. Here. Here's American Gladiators. Watch this, shut up. Go back to bed, America. Here is American Gladiators. Here is 56 channels of it! Watch these pituitary retards bang their fucking skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom. Here you go, America! You are free to do as we tell you! You are free to do what we tell you!
Obviously the point of sept clues is to expose the fact that there was fakery and deception to cover up what really hit. Based on my research I believe some type of military plane/drone of some type hit those towers. Ppl will say, well then how did those ppl die? Well maybe they were still on that whatever hit? Maybe not, who knows. The gov is capable of anything. The point is the deception is there and everything points so a big cover up, regarding the coverage.
ok....how do you guys explain the lost lives on the planes??? you should be able to find out whether those people listed on those flights actually lost their lives or not... one of you guys explain that for me please... and don't give me some far fetched explanation.
@iSpeakstheTruth Maybe they used actors? Or they made them people up? Its not hard to make a fake passport.. They get actors saying they lost there loved ones on the planes.
I never took the no plane theory seriously, but after watching this...wow. that news footage looks pretty sketchy.
A note on the passengers..
A flight from east coast to west coast takes like 6-8 hours. So would noon be too early to arrive there? And if you look at the passengers on the planes it gets a little odd. The planes didn't have very many passengers on board and a large number of the passengers were government officials.
No planers are completely retarded morons. And nothing like using the shitiest low resolution film-played back & in slo mo to make it even more ridiculous.Then throw out some fake math & act like you know what you're talking about.ON top of that,these assholes say no one was killed,the towers were emptied since 1993 & were completely empty. All raving horseshit lies.More like Dis-info FBI tactics to make everyone look crazy in the 911 Truth movement.Scientists,military,architects
@cadu1995 Sepetember clues is not proof of no planes, you can take it in any context you see fit. I'm not a no planer but certainly believe in the use of tv fakery and that AA Flight 11 or UA Flight 175 were not the aircraft that hit the towers, just like AA Flight 77 didn't hit the pentagon. Something hit them, just not them. Its not very civilised to go about calling people names. Anymore of it and you will be blocked from commenting.
@TheRangersLegend certainly believe in the use of tv fakery and that AA Flight 11 or UA Flight 175 were not the aircraft that hit the towers- if you are of the opinion that Miltary planes hit the tower then thats one thing.I do also.But it wasn't done thru TV fakery at all.
But everyone that subscribs to september clues believe there were NO PLANES.That's where they got the No-Planers from.
And who exactly did i call names? YOU? Anyone else here? I really don't give a shit what you do.
@cadu1995 Not everyone who supports this film is no planers. A quick read through the comments will confirm this. I don't care who your comments were directed at and you spammed up my channel and one of my unrelated videos with the same nonsense. True truthseekers will debate and keep an open mind, not call people who don't share their viewpoint retarded morons. Leave the sheeple who believe the mainstream to the name calling.
@cadu1995 you can always tell cause they censor their comments too. People who inhibit free dialogue don't want truth tellers to be able to disseminate the truth without their control.
@breathebliss... I get your question, but ask yourself that? Hopkins International Airport in Cleveland Ohio, the Mayor, local radio stations, and the airport reported that flight 93 landed at 10:06am and unloaded 200 people into a NASA building at the back of the airport. At the same time there was a bomb threat and the airport was evacuated. Flight 93 and flight 11 were not even on the list to fly that day.. So to answer your question, they are gone, just not from the planes
I was in the fourth grade. My teacher turned this on after she heard about what happened. I noticed the fade to black at the moment of impact and could tell something was wrong with the entire situation. It generally just didn't look right. I was in the fourth grade. I knew, and still know what is going on.
the woman who is filming + another women say - OMG IT WAS A MILITARY PLANE!!! they cut out the hit of the 2nd plane + wtc crash but forgot about that...
I think this is the former "Operation Northwoods" the Pentagon planned 50 years ago.
Here is a CNN Video where you can see the fake 2nd plane and the real one...? that didn`t hit the WTC (at 1:36)
watch?v=JRv60iCu2aI&feature=channel_video_title
and here is a never before seen Video from the ...plane... hit the Pentagon => filmed by a helicopter or so...not the video which was released to the media.
@SuperYesyesyo Yeah seen both those videos but the latter of an apparent missile hitting the pentagon is clearly faked as its not stabilised to the backround and its trajectory is not consistent with the damage caused to the building. I'm not saying a missile didn't hit the pentagon as i'm fairly confident one did but that video is not proof of it.
I eventually stopped watching this after bout an hour. How can anyone dispute that planes hit the twin towers. Hundreds of people gathered in the streets watched the events unfold before their very eyes!! I've been watching alot of vids/docs about 9/11 recently, some official (from major networks) and some from the conspiracy angle. The more I watch the stronger my feelings are that this was a an inside job and major cover up, too many unanswered questions, clutching at straws with this vid.
@Glenmead well I do not believe in the no planes theory but also do not believe the towers were struck by AA Flight 11 or UA Flight 175 so my explenation to your question would be that the firemen you speak of seen aircraft of some sort, a drone, and have mistaken it for commercial flights. I could imagine how difficult it would be to identify what they were form ground level travelling at speed.
Poor evidence. At 11:58, the creator suggests that the two were shot at the same angle, when they obviously were not. If they were, the horizons would be the same. On the left you can see the city while on the right you see only sky. The right one was obviously shot from a lower perspective, so the plane also appears lower. Critical thinking fail. Also, there are countless photos of the second plane taken by non media sources, so this digital plane theory is nonsense.
@TheRangersLegend See =dr4BJ89Df5Q Again, the evidence presented in this video is ridiculous and demonstrates a lack of critical thinking. If the two videos are supposedly shot from the same perspective, why are the horizons different? Secondly, when you're standing between extremely tall buildings, your line of sight is limited. The plane is flying fast and is not going to hang around. There would only be a split second for anybody to see it.
I wouldn't doubt that these media reporters are CIA or NSA contractors.
TheStackmagic 3 days ago
So how do we know that the makers of this video didn't play around with the original video images in order to come up with the basis for this video???
streetmuggedbypolice 3 days ago
Why The Military Knows Israel Did 9/11
/watch?v=kVKGRB3cygg
War By Deception (9/11, Iraq, PNAC , All Roads Lead To Israel) {Full Film}
/watch?v=CP5JfKPoIl4
9/11 - Missing Links ( full movie )
/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4
Israel Betrays America into War with Iran
/watch?v=MnT8bTMN4oU
megamogx 3 days ago
Few, if any people, died on 911 Who hasn't seen 3000 missing for the Social Sercurity Death list? If 3000 died, there should have been 9000 on the 911 01 death list. There were only 6000 listed deaths, which means 3000 fakes were made up for the 911 MEGA RITUAL, day of MASSIVE insurance FRAUD. Who has not looked into Gelitin, The B-Thing or World Views art students who lived in WTC1 & 2 primarily on floors 91 & 92 from 1997 to 2001. There were no businesses in the top WTC. Do your homework.
074August 6 days ago
The plane graphic was a PVI VIRTUAL MEDIA SERVICES graphic insertion. It was a graphic, it wasn't real. If you don't know anything about VIRTUAL insertion, go to Sportvision. Sportvision & ESPN2 bought PVI from Cablevision in 12/2010. I will post a PVI virtual media video so that you can see how easy & seamlessly a graphic can be inserted. At Sportvision's website you can see lots of samples of inserting graphics into live video with the PVI LVIS computer.
074August 6 days ago
Whenever I think of Mike Walter's description I think of a slinky. It just sort of went boooooing and folded up. A slinky or an accordion, something cartoon like.
irishman05050505 6 days ago
@johnh173 yes we should if this was just about some freakin money, of which has no actual gold-standard value anymore in this country, then alot of people died in vein. And for those who caused this catastrophe...well, karma's a bitch
ForTheRecordSC 1 week ago
@ForTheRecordSC
Oh no,it has nothing to do with money.It is all about control.9/11 was orchestrated with sole intention of generating sufficient amount of hatred towards muslim world so that war in Iraq can take place and that Israel can continue to rape Palestinian nation.Next stage is Codex Alimentarius whose role is to criminalize vitamins and natural supplements-anything that is cheap and very good for you so that pharma companies can sell you 'the cure' when you go ill.
SuperMarioY 4 days ago
@blowndesert if that's the true reasons that this whole event happened...then that's pretty sad. Coming from a home where my dad is a firefighter, I feel for the families who might have lost their firefighting dads or moms, husbands or wives, who might have died in vain :/
ForTheRecordSC 1 week ago
He says the wings of the jet folded back, so they now build jets with hinges that makes it possible for wings to fold back and stay connected to plane, ok, ameriduuuh full of shit.
Sept11IsALie 1 week ago
As much proof and as obvious that this was set up , it wont ever matter. The Govt controls what people think. if it's not important then it wont ever effect them. Look how quickly we went to war based on their word, yet look how fast they are to provide real proof. I mean come on, we have a new leader and yet they never looked into it.
DeathandHealing 1 week ago
/ w a t c h ? v = k J i 2 K 8 m K T R M
nice complete, non edited penetration of a MISSILE
8soko 1 week ago
@ForTheRecordSC
I appreciate that you are open minded person... there was only one outcome out of this.. that OBL was declared as a person behind the act very soon within minutes...what else left from giving a war to afghanistan...
blowndesert 1 week ago
About that white plane at 1 hr 2 mins: In many cultures over time, people have reported seeing a white bird or (recently) white plane flying near the area where a person or persons have died. The theory is that these are angels (maybe) who are collecting the souls of the dead. I saw that plane too in the live TV coverage & I'm now convinced that it's one of those supernatural vehicles.
xander7ful 1 week ago
That was not an airplane that hit. It was a demonic being morphed as an airplane. Watch 4:44 to 4:45 and you'll see that the lower wing is split in half, like a wishbone from a turkey. Also, when its head comes out the other end, you can see it's body arching up behind it.
xander7ful 1 week ago
He also thinks Boeings are made out of Legos.
tadpoleposition 1 week ago
Mike Walter is the proud owner of a decrepit soul.
tadpoleposition 1 week ago
WOW. Incredible. Yet people just jump on the wagon and call people crazy and offensive for not believing the "official" story/report. All people in doubt need to see this and rethink some stuff. I do not believe the governments changing, fabricated story for one second.
NoApologiesEver 1 week ago
Research the insider trading and it'll become fairly obvious who benefited from 9/11...follow the money. I suppose that could be of little practical significance though...Great video, this might be the last video I would recommend to someone just getting into 9/11, but once you get your bearings this is the most important video. Thank you for you work Simon.
irishman05050505 1 week ago 2
So I don't really agree with this idea of 9/11 being a set up but, I am open minded person. So I have a question to anyone that can answer it in a logical way. Why would our government do this to us? How do we as a country or even them benefit in any way?
ForTheRecordSC 2 weeks ago
@ForTheRecordSC
Have you read the bloomberg report on the real 2008 financial bailout at 7.7 trillion -11 x tarp. This allowed a small group of elite bankers to steal hundreds of billions from you - and not one criminal conviction. Meanwhile the debt goes from 9 to 15 trillion in the last 3 years? It is well established that your government does not work for you or care about you. Several senators (ex. Dennis Kucinich) want to reinvestigate 911 - we should support their efforts.
johnh173 1 week ago
11 master occultists, masons, kabbalists-zionists & witches were each in his/her assigned spot for the 911 megaritual: Bush, Cheney, Tenet, Bush's sorcerer aunt Cappelletti, Bill Gates, il duce Giuliania, Condi Rice, Schwarzenegger, Silverstein, Soros & Saddam Hussein, not dead, self-proclaimed incarnation of Nebuchandnezzer who knows the ancient Sumerian secrets of turning gold into monoatomic gold for antigravity vehicles & DNA replenishing elixir. See Jim Marrs Lecture series on monoatic gold
074August 6 days ago
@ForTheRecordSC
It is called 'control'.'Problem-reaction-solution',very simple.They had to scare you into giving most of your human rights in the name of 'war on terror'.The world as we know it has never been the same since 9/11.Every step you make,what you eat,what time you go to bed,what you have for breakfast,everything is monitored,all in the name of 'war on terror' friend.Days of ignorance are over,time to wake up.Watch 'Seeds of deception' by Jeffrey Smith to start with.
SuperMarioY 4 days ago
Oops.I guess they already brought these two things to light.I should've watched the whole video first
lute760 2 weeks ago
Also notice that at 3:44, the camera just happens to "zoom in" just in time to catch the second plane hit almost as if they knew what was about to happen.How conveniently coincidental (sarcasm)
lute760 2 weeks ago
Notice at 3:48 the "nose" of the plane comes right out of the other side of the building intact after crashing all the way through a steel and concrete building.I didn't know the nose of an "aluminum jet was that strong, in fact, what I've always heard in my lifetime was that the nose of a jet is one of the weakest parts of the jet.
lute760 2 weeks ago
effecting four to eight floors.. I think thats about right
broadcastmyass4u 2 weeks ago
Government agents planted in News media?
DrunkenRhinoceros 3 weeks ago
@DrunkenRhinoceros
Old article worth reading:
THE CIA AND THE MEDIA (1977) - BY CARL BERNSTEIN
simonshack 2 weeks ago
You do realise you have disproved your own main theory about the Nose of the plane flying through the 2nd tower and the broadcasters then blacking the screen @ the 0.23.28 mark right? You can clearly see the nose of the plane here too, it wasn't a hoax at all IMO and its disrespectful of you to try to prove so, this is coming from an unbaised Irishman with no connection to 9/11 or America for that matter.
homersimpsonIRL 4 weeks ago
@homersimpsonIRL This is not my work, you need to take your concerns up with 'simonshack'.
However it is disrespectful to blissfully accept the governments official report given what is and what is not in it. That Evan Fairbanks video you speak of was released some time after the events of 9/11 as were most of the others and if faked would have been done in a way so not to contradict the live nose out shot mistake.
TheRangersLegend 4 weeks ago 13
@homersimpsonIRL It appears to me, they are trying to cover up the nose of the drone or missile that made it through to the other side. Which is clearly a different shape than that of the alleged planes that hit. So of course you'd be able to see it from the 23.28 angle too. I don't know what's real anymore though. But I don't believe the US Government's story to be 100% truth.
MediaFi 3 weeks ago
@homersimpsonIRL put your respect / disrespect aside. No real planes hit the WTC, it was all CGI digital manipulation that you have been deceived with. You can try to argue against the evidence that proves this all you want, but it doesn't change the truth.
digitruth 3 weeks ago
@homersimpsonIRL I think you misunderstand what is meant by "hoax". All the footage we have seen, either broadcast live or "shot by amateurs" and then released to the media... we saw is what they WANTED us to see. The "hoax" is that the media manipulated the footage to make it look like something it wasn't. Witnesses report not seeing planes but only seeing/hearing explosions. If I had a loved one died in 9/11, I would want to know the ENTIRE truth, not the convenient truth.
TubingWithMyGnomies 2 days ago
what do you think if CNN or FOX played this?
NgatiWhatuaBoy1 1 month ago
Does anyone think the producers of some of these videos were trying to leave hints of video manipulation, such as the moving bridge?
wbrc2001 1 month ago
@wbrc2001 The bridge isn't moving, the chopper is moving. derp
lunartraveler 3 weeks ago
This is what people should be watching, none of the other documentaries that just explain things in talk most people don't understand, but still pretend they're experts on it
CaelanMT 1 month ago 2
This is how journalism should be done.
Izahdnb 1 month ago 2
9/11 was an inside job blamed on saddam hussein and his ppl so americans would support a war on the middle east
817Elzacatecano 1 month ago 6
[re CNN feed] You make a great deal of assumptions in your analysis. I've shown you alternate rational explanations to your CNN broadcast analysis [at start of vid] of the impact of Flight 175 into WTC2. My 2nd point can easily explain the brief video blackout experienced by ALL broadcasters receiving their signal fm WTC1 when Fl 175 hit WTC2.
The success of a any hypothesis, is how well it measures up to critical analysis.
We tend to see what we obsessively want, even if it's not really there.
MelioraCogito 1 month ago
@MelioraCogito People really do not want to even entertain the notion that their Newsmedia is participating in the fabrication of world events. It throws their entire perception of reality into question and they will fight tooth and nail to avoid that situation.
LifePsyop 1 month ago 10
[re CNN feed 3]
WE MAY OBSERVE THAT: Winston’s mic/phone picks up ambient sound BUT NO EXPLOSION
As stated before, Winston is standing at the base of WTC1 on the north side. His immediate area is full of emergency vehicles with engines running. His LOS with WTC2 is limited if not wholly obscured by WTC1. News broadcast/cel phone mic’s are unidirectional: they are sensitive to sound fm one direction only. The explosion occurs 80 stories above & around the corner from him. Ergo no BOOM! in audio.
MelioraCogito 1 month ago
[re CNN feed 2]
WE MAY OBSERVE THAT: SCREEN BLACKS OUT on impact (8 black frames)
The top floors of WTC1 was a beehive of broadcast & utility radio equip incl repeaters, microwave, analog & digital TV transmitters; incl backup gens. 6 of 8 NY area TV stns [WPIX, WCBS, WNBC, WABC, WNET, WWOR] used WTC1 to broadcast to the NY/NJ area – the live broadcasts that day were being transmitted via equip in WTC1! The reception loss resulted fm WTC1 experiencing the blast wave fm Fl 175’s impact of WTC2.
MelioraCogito 1 month ago
@MelioraCogito Although it doesn't just blackout its fades out and in. Is there an explanation for this with the resulting loss of reception?
TheRangersLegend 1 month ago 5
@MelioraCogito i understand what you are saying ... BUT i have a question about the collapse.... How did we have live footage from helicopters etc.. of the collapse of both buildings? if your theory is correct. .we would have lost everything and been blacked out until a suitable solution was available.... no?
gusubu17 1 week ago
[re CNN feed 1]
WE MAY OBSERVE THAT: NO ONE sees or mentions "plane"
Could it be the CNN host is NOT watching his monitor at the time Flight 175 enters the view before hitting WTC2 < 2 sec later? Winston confirmed he's standing on the NORTH side of WTC1 – WTC2 is very likely, NOT in his LOS (line-of-sight). Furthermore, at the time Fl 175 hits WTC2 [fm south side], he's looking up the north face of WTC1 to judge the size of the hole created by Fl 11. No "plane" because no one saw it. (cont)
MelioraCogito 1 month ago
could be drones
RSguideX 1 month ago
first plane hits at 8:46 am 8+4+6=18. 8+1=9
2nd plane hits at 9:02 am 9+2=11
the illuminati love to use numerology, astrology, and sacred geometry
thepossessor 2 months ago
@thepossessor you can make numbers do whatever you want them to do tbh... and why did the "8 and 1" need to be added from the 18but not the "1 and 1" from the 11... do research instead of stupid math
SHOCKWAVEkd 1 month ago
Dr. Judy Wood has made the most detailed study on the subject, everyone should check her work...
andywitch666 2 months ago
Sign the petition at Architects and Engineers for 911truth.org.
kitethesnow 2 months ago
One small thing people haven't picked up on are the 'downed' light poles near the p3ntag0n. They convinced us with a simulation that wings of a passenger jet were strong enough to hit steel poles at 500+mph and not get sliced through. It would have been easy to put small charges on the retaining bolts at the base of the poles and set them off in synchro with the missile attack.
caxtonman 2 months ago
@caxtonman I've seen a video (forgot the name, unfortunately) of interviews with like 10 random people (None knew each other) that said the plan flew nowhere near those posts. They were all asked to draw on a map where the plane flew. Every single person matched to within 2-3 of each other for the entire flight path until it pulled up and flew OVER the Pentagon. The official story is BS.
cockyjeremy 1 month ago
While the media lied to us, not all intentionally, Peter Jennings knew as much as you and I, But such as he were fed lies. While their is suspect video, like Mikael Hezarkhani. And odd witnesses like Mike Walters.NOT All The Witness and Video of the 2nd Impact Are Lies. The video is consistent. Nano Thermite is in all dust samples. Something hit the WTC, it Looks like a Boeing. But it's no Boeing. Therein lies the truth. Nano Thermite is part of the truth. But reducing all video to lies is wrong
IExposeMormonism 2 months ago
Wow. One of the best vids I have seen so far on 9/11. A real eye opener.
caxtonman 2 months ago 4
Please don't let gwb know if i have seen that documentary... he will put me a jail :(
RasJah7Prince1 2 months ago
It says what many of us have been saying all along. 9/11 was an inside job; a false flag operation.
Study the information out there and you can come to the only conclusion; we did it to ourselves.
rollandmiller1 2 months ago
Well wing back,,, wow!!! at 500 mph wings have time to fold> === . NOT
patous2 2 months ago
Two skyscrapers pancake from fire in the upper stories for the first time in the history of skyscrapers? Bldg 7 pancakes hours later? There is so much evidence that we allowed this.. by planes which I believe.. and a missile at the Pentagon and WE shot down the PA flight. Any fighter pilot will tell you he could not have managed flying so low to the ground and not flipping from the ground interference even flying a fighter jet! In PA not even a drop of DNA anywhere acc. to the Medical Examiner!
nanci00 2 months ago
Not possible to fly an aircraft that size 500mph that low to ground and be so accurate and not hit the ground Violates physics. Where are the bodies and wreckage? If fireball was so intense they brought down towers, why wasn't this fireball so whimpy? Grass not even burned. ??? Yeah... Right. This is all a hoax, people.
ZetaWatcher 2 months ago
@bravepercennius So the rest isn't disinfo after all and the government hasn't ''got me''.
TheRangersLegend 2 months ago
@bravepercennius If only it was so clear cut. Al-Queda was manufactured by the CIA long before 2001.
TheRangersLegend 3 months ago
And omg, the damn pixelation?? Really?
TesticularRainbows 3 months ago
I think the darkness of the plane is the angle at which it was flying. It was most likely shaded byt the tower itself, the side of the tower it was flying on is, after all, in shadow. And pointing out the building in the sunlight doesn't really make a case because judging from the surrounding buildings, the one pointed to seems to be far to the right of the plane, which would put it right in the sunlight while the plane remains in the shadow of the tower. Basically I think that video makes sense
TesticularRainbows 3 months ago
@TesticularRainbows Although, idk about the later vid where the plane is further away but still appears to be in shadow, lol
TesticularRainbows 3 months ago
Not being funny or anything, but when I die, I am going to ask god alot of questions that ive wanted to know forever, but here are my top 5:
1. Are humans on Earth the only intelligent life form in the universe
2. How was the Universe really created
3. Was 9/11 set up
4.Do ghosts really exist.
5. Are there dinosaurs still alive on Earth (Mostly in Oceans)
LionelxMessix 3 months ago
@LionelxMessix Lochness
timothym10 2 months ago
all this seems to make sense but, and ill just count my ignorance in to this next question: how do we explain all the tickets bought and the lives dissapearing on all of the flights on sep. 11th? i dont know much im trying to figure out more, there were four planes supposedly right flight 93, the pentagon, and both towers, how do we explain where the people went when family members and friends probably know that certain people were flying in those planes and they died?
ABeastApproaches 3 months ago
@ABeastApproaches If you watch "the zeitgeist full movie" not the addendum. That might help explain what happened to the passengers of these planes. I wonder sometimes too.....we live in a very sad time.
jallison79 2 months ago
Those shots of twin towers are unusually blurry. These are network cameras mounted on helicopters, you'ld assume they would be of high quality but many of the amature videos have better detail than the chopper cams. another strange thing on 9/11.
mrh785 3 months ago
The first time i saw this , i went out and told everyone i knew that there was no plane and they looked at me as if i was crazy . For years it bothered me that these "planes" from the 911 clips were definitely not real , yet 2 people whom i told said they were there and SAW it happen , ???. I didn't delve as intensely into 911 again for years ; it's only last week that i saw a video called Project Bluestream that seems to put the pieces together, saying they were holographic projections .
salemthemerciless 3 months ago
@salemthemerciless Its Project Bluebeam.....
TheRangersLegend 3 months ago
There would not even have been an investigation if it had not been for the Family's of the 9/11 victims. The FAA should have tried to piece together these airplanes. As for the Investigations that they had, they all read like comic books. The NIST report did not even use high school science in their investigations. The FBI report is a joke and in fact numerous comedians have made money using the FBI 9/11 report alone as their material. At the very least new Independent Investigations are needed.
4390100 3 months ago
this is way to complicated to even bother to think to fake something like that...it s easier to crash real planes. all i am just saying is that the planes really crashed in towers, at pentagon maybe a missle and surely US goverment knew about the attacks and did nothing. i think my oppinion it s more plausible, in fact it matches in US history...it s almost a tradition.
simandicos 3 months ago
@simandicos Do you not think it would be easier to fake the images rather than have two airliners flown into the wtc with pin point accuracy? The risk of having a plane miss its target would have been just too much given how difficult it would have been at that speed and altitude. I'm not a ''no planer'' but fairly certain the images are not real. I'm more inclinated to believe that remotely operated drones were used.
TheRangersLegend 3 months ago 21
@TheRangersLegend if an UAV can take off and land by itself, i think that technology can be assembled on an airliner ....but to set up a scam like this in wich so many things can go wrong...i think the men who u think of thought to do that are smart enough not to take the chance to ruin it so easely. i repeat...in my oppinion the american intelligence closed eyes in front of incoming attack and just stood there and watched the show.
simandicos 3 months ago
@TheRangersLegend Lol, if the US sacrificed thousands of lives pulling off this conspiracy as you would see it, why the hell would they care about the risk of the planes missing their targets?? And what about all the people that filmed it on cameras in the streets, are they all gov't pawns as well? Where were you on 9/11? I happened to be right across the river and my mother was on her way to work when the second plane hit and she witnessed it.
TesticularRainbows 3 months ago
@TesticularRainbows How would they have been able to explain the building collapses if the planes missed there target? If you were there and seen it with your own eyes and were able to identify exactly what hit the towers than thats great. But from what I have seen and read I have yet to come across a testimony from anyone who could make a positive identification. My opinions do not support a 'no plane' theory and never have done.
TheRangersLegend 3 months ago
@TheRangersLegend Okay, I never said they did, hon
TesticularRainbows 3 months ago
There's pretty good motive for all these producers and executives too. Ratings for their channels probably quadrupled and everyone in the country became either part of the CNN watching camp or Fox News watching camp for the next two years.
railroadwino1 3 months ago 14
HOLY COW! JUST FOR SOME ROTTEN DINOSAUR C**P! THE ILLUMINATI PLANNED IT ALL! FOR MORE INFO, GO TO: "FARHKHAN501". HE HAS VIDS OF HOW THE ILLUMINATI "PLAN" THESE SORT OF ATTACKS. PLEASE LIKE SO EVERYONE CAN SEE!!
1234everbs 4 months ago
There have bn experiments were psychologists/psychiatrists have bn able to convince individuals that certain childhood memories have happened to them that in reality have not. The technique's used are repetition and apparent confirming testimony from credible sources to the individuals involved (although the credible people were just going along with the experiment).
You would be surprised how easy it is to influence someone into thinking anything (within reason) is real or factual, even huge c
col4022 4 months ago
IMO the ABC video looks like as if it has a 747 in it. I noticed a slight bulge near the front of the fuselage.
MoustachesAreEpic 4 months ago
Pretty fuckin' amazing, awesome vid!!
jezzmoto 4 months ago
Well researched and presented, it offers a dimension I had not considered yet but in the end it only adds to the numerous questions this whole event brings up. When I watched the planes crashing into the towers in 2001 it just didn't feel right. I can't prove it but it was a gut feeling that this situation had been tampered with. I have never lost that initial doubt.
casaamaril 4 months ago
how did they fake the planes on every media outlet's camera footage? also every civilan's video footage, and what about all the witnesses at the scene who saw it live and in 3 D?
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed I'm not here to give you the answers but as described in the film almost each and every one of the released footage are creditied to persons withing the world of media and audio editing. Also for every witness who claims to see the planes they cannot identify them as AA or UA aircraft and just as many witnesses fail to see any plane or have quoted miltary aircraft or even missiles.
TheRangersLegend 4 months ago
@TheRangersLegend I don't believe the official story, but honestly, I would consider angular reflection as a possible cause of the "matrix" shots. Why not, since both the buildings have large glass panes? This might also explain why it's out of flight path, as well as why it appears on 5 different shots. Don't think this is conclusive evidence.
kevinsolx 4 months ago
@TheRangersLegend it's all in what you choose to believe, example: conspiracy theorists say that April Gallop (who was at the pentagon) never saw a plane (assuming that there was no plane but a missile), turns out that she was looking at her computer monitor, of course she never saw a plane, she wasn't looking, but she also never said she saw a missile. just because people said they couldn't identify the planes does not mean there were not people who could.
cont next post.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed I don't choose to believe anything......I'm just looking at the info and building an opinion on that. The fact remains that hardly anyone, regardless of what the official report states, could not visually identify the aircrafts and also have very little evidence of their very existence.
TheRangersLegend 4 months ago
@TheRangersLegend there are way more videos of people who said they saw a plane hit the so. tower (everybody at the scene was looking at the no. tower while the so. tower was hit) then there are videos of people who were there and said they doubt it was a plane that hit the south tower, just because they did not identify what airline the plane was from does not prove they did not see a plane, show me 1 video of an at the scene witness who said there was no plane. show me just 1 video of that.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed I never said people didn't see planes but rather they would not have been able to identify them. I'm not in the no plane mindset despite what the documentaries viewpoint is although there are many videos, quotes etc of people not seeing, or hearing, planes approaching. Whatever explanation for that is I do not know.
TheRangersLegend 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed cont from prev post.
of all the people who filmed the so. tower being hit by the plane, why is there not 1 video of the so. tower exploding without a plane in the shot? where is any evidence backing up your claim? did the government retreave every video from people who they did not know would be filming too? if what you claim is true then there would be 1 video filmed without a plane in the shot that the government would have missed. so why did it never turn up?
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed You ask if the government retrieved every video? Do you know of a single original VHS or even a roll of film of 9/11 that exists today? Every frame of 9/11 imagery has been filtered through NIST or some other agency.
It is entirely feasible to use electronic jamming devices to block real amateur cameramen in the area. Not saying this is what happened, but it would solve the problem easily.
But regardless of these questions, the planes are still obviously animations.
LifePsyop 4 months ago 2
@loosechangeexposed this looks real, too watch?v=oSfrAtAMqq0 LG 3D Optimus--Optimize your life
kaabe41 4 months ago
I didn't get to watch the whole thing, but what happened to the flights, and people on the flights that did go missing after takeoff? Apparently these people made phone calls to loved ones - can someone explain this? Thanks..
elwoodjoey88 4 months ago 2
@elwoodjoey88 It is very simple to create fake victim identities, fake phone calls, fake flight plans, etc. Have you ever considered that the "thousands of people died" story is completely made up? Search for the 'VicSim Report', or 'Did 3,000 people really die on 9/11' ?
These are questions the popular 9/11 "truthers" will attack you for asking. I wonder why?
LifePsyop 3 months ago 4
if the government was able to somehow fake the planes at the WTC on live t.v., other people's personal videos, and infront of the 1000's who witnessed it live at the scene, then how come they didn't edit a video at the pentagon with a plane using CGI? if they planned it out they could have had a video already edited and released it to the media moments after the pentagon was hit.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed because if they did it would have to show a 757 taking the manoeuvres as stated in their official report. Which would just look rediculous and even more less believable. The frames they did release does show what appears to be a trail from a missile. My guess it was hit by a small military aircraft which fired a missile just moments prior to impact. Many witnesses recall a 'fly by' of a 757 or something similar. The wtc's were the focus of the deception in my opinion.
TheRangersLegend 4 months ago
@TheRangersLegend the video they did release only showed the impact point and about 300 feet before it, it would have been easy for them to simply make it look like a plane was in the shot, my video "loose change answer number 053" explains the pentagon. the plane was on a hard right bank then went into a hard left bank just before impact, it was the left wing tip in the shot, many people said they never saw a plane (cuz they weren't looking) none of them said they saw a missile.
loosechangeexposed 4 months ago
@loosechangeexposed they didn't do a pentagon CGI video because they wanted to use the pentagon as a red herring. And it worked, many "9/11 truth" camps focused primarily on missiles hitting the pentagon and used lack of video as their evidence. Doing this also helps hide their ability to use CGI.
LifePsyop 4 months ago
Mike Walter Eye's keeps looking to the right as if he's in a nervous position ..Look at his body language , he's acting !! The Mans Full Of Shit if you ask me..
robtang10304 4 months ago
do you censor your comments shill?
gtechie 5 months ago
@gtechie if your comments been censored it means it has contained abuse. I don't tolerate it on any of the documentaries I have uploaded and encourage reasonable debate. If you disagree with something and want to express that then please do it within the guidelines and include any evidence you may have that contradicts the information shown.
TheRangersLegend 5 months ago
I remember someone had claimed there was a building missing on the skyline of New York. I have no idea what the skyline should look like . Does anyone remember that claim and what buildling it was. They traveled over in different areas and could not get information as to "where"' some of the people with cameras were taking their shots in order to "miss" this building.
goldenpassages 5 months ago
2) hole in pentagon to smal for a plane, the fact that exact area had just been reinforced, no debris, no clear video release of the 'plane?' hitting when they have confiscated many. 3) the flight in pennsylvania the corroner said there was no point him being there as there were no bodies and no blood!!! 4) building 7 is a joke, it had no reason to come down i dont care what anyone says, 5) There is far more compelling evidence I urge non believers to look. The truth needs to come out.
ScunthorpeAcousticM 5 months ago
mass murder that day!!! My family knows a police woman from england (im in the uk) that was working there that day and she says she knows for a fact 1000s more died then what has been disclosed. When you look at all the evidence the whole thing is laughable. So to those who refuse to accept a cover up i would say do your reseach first and you will be suprised and shocked! for one the fact that mobiles couldnt work on planes back then but miraculosly did on that day, which has been proven,
ScunthorpeAcousticM 5 months ago
Great documentary. For 10 years I believed the attacks were real and I assumed all the conspiracy theories were regarding an alien attack |(for some reason) until I came across a 911 film, forget what it was called, and it certainly opened my eyes. I had no idea before just how many holes there were in the supposed true story,I have now done a lot of research on the subject and I believe 100% that it is a cover up. I'm not sure if it was missiles or planes but I know the governemt committed
ScunthorpeAcousticM 5 months ago
I'm a drummer and i'm no terriorst! -.-
But seriously. All this is compelling evidence. I believed in the conspiracies before, But now I have even more facts on it.
ChadMaltoMusic 5 months ago
The majority of video fakers & dodgy witnesses have Jewish names, faces, or both. Meanwhile, major media is indisputably Jewish-owned. So the same ones who created a "6 million killed" lie to illicitly empower themselves created a new "3 thousand" lie for new obscene power. (And notice how they did it in NEW YORK.) They waited to get their hands on the levers of U.S. military power. Now Israel covertly expands using the 9-11 lie, taking over the Middle East, the Gentiles as their stomping golem.
DivineFellowship 5 months ago
1:17:17 why is a camera filmin a camera..lol..
4624tone 5 months ago
33:21 watch he says tower two, then gut cuts him "looks like a hollywood movie" looks down at paper work , then corrects tower 1 tower 1...lol, it was a script
4624tone 5 months ago
One of my favorite parts is the differing colors of the sky in the various networks' news footage. That's something I sorta subconsciously noted when I watched old videos, even before I started doubting the official story. I was there that day, it was a perfect late summer day. Blue skies, a few billowy clouds, warm but not hot. It wasn't an orangy/gray hazy day as if it was 98 degrees in the middle of August.
peterp21 5 months ago
umm wth is tht thing, its in up middle screen, going above the towers and looks to be far away. from 03:43 to 03:46.
superblol1 5 months ago
@superblol1 Could be just a news helicopter. There's also several videos out there that show a third plane flying up and away from the towers around the time of the impact. It's hard to tell in the "mystery plane" videos how far that plane is from the towers (and conversely how close it might be to JFK or LaGuardia) although I thought it looks like it was flying right over Manhattan and not Queens. Anyway, that's my opinion.
peterp21 5 months ago
for people who trust facts more than emotion this is a fantastic documentary, ive seen it a dozen times orso. for the mass its like trying to convice a catholic that the bible is a fairytale, impossible , people cant think for themselves anymore
footyclub1 5 months ago 25
@footyclub1 very well said.
tamather2647 4 months ago
I will admit, I was caught up in the emotion of 9/11 when it happened, I'm naturally emotional! But also have a scientific mind, and I remember the very moment I started to doubt what was being reported. When I saw the 'evidence' of the alleged terrorists - barely undamaged passports and a bandana (what an insult to anyone's intelligence) - my bullshit radar engaged. Great documentary, It's a shame most people don't look at all of this with a modicum of common sense
thekweewee 5 months ago 34
@thekweewee I remember thinking, how did they come up with Osama Bin Laden so fast....and how the plane virtually disappears into the building before the explosion....
Jamato4891 4 months ago
Nice work on this video. If you look at the footage at 1.24.33 you can see smoke rising from the base of one of the towers prior to its collapse. The location of the source of the smoke is obstructed by a television screen banner. Check it out people.
dozer3955 5 months ago
Strange, the planes that hit the WTC towers must have been created from different materials than the one that hit the pentagon since the wings cut right into the towers like a hot knife through butter and the wings folded back from hitting the pentagon. Hmmm... From what I know, Boeing uses the same manufacturing process in each of it's 7x7 series airframes.
DemonDik 5 months ago
Go back to bed, America. Your government has figured out how it all transpired. Go back to bed, America. Your government is in control again. Here. Here's American Gladiators. Watch this, shut up. Go back to bed, America. Here is American Gladiators. Here is 56 channels of it! Watch these pituitary retards bang their fucking skulls together and congratulate you on living in the land of freedom. Here you go, America! You are free to do as we tell you! You are free to do what we tell you!
kajjagoogoo 5 months ago
@kajjagoogoo You sound very much like Bill Hicks ;o)
Tbaldwin1971 5 months ago
1:09:12 "The BBC wisely left out flying buildings." LOL
btw this documentary rocks - outstanding work!
Izahdnb 5 months ago
I hate how people come to the conclusion that this means "no planes". So damn annoying.
jedichris8 5 months ago
Yes.
Obviously the point of sept clues is to expose the fact that there was fakery and deception to cover up what really hit. Based on my research I believe some type of military plane/drone of some type hit those towers. Ppl will say, well then how did those ppl die? Well maybe they were still on that whatever hit? Maybe not, who knows. The gov is capable of anything. The point is the deception is there and everything points so a big cover up, regarding the coverage.
jedichris8 5 months ago 2
ok....how do you guys explain the lost lives on the planes??? you should be able to find out whether those people listed on those flights actually lost their lives or not... one of you guys explain that for me please... and don't give me some far fetched explanation.
iSpeakstheTruth 5 months ago
@iSpeakstheTruth Maybe they used actors? Or they made them people up? Its not hard to make a fake passport.. They get actors saying they lost there loved ones on the planes.
tamather2647 4 months ago
I never took the no plane theory seriously, but after watching this...wow. that news footage looks pretty sketchy.
A note on the passengers..
A flight from east coast to west coast takes like 6-8 hours. So would noon be too early to arrive there? And if you look at the passengers on the planes it gets a little odd. The planes didn't have very many passengers on board and a large number of the passengers were government officials.
kihhn 5 months ago
great job on this video very interesting good content ,and yes 911 was an inside job.
grumpyjamaican 5 months ago
No planers are completely retarded morons. And nothing like using the shitiest low resolution film-played back & in slo mo to make it even more ridiculous.Then throw out some fake math & act like you know what you're talking about.ON top of that,these assholes say no one was killed,the towers were emptied since 1993 & were completely empty. All raving horseshit lies.More like Dis-info FBI tactics to make everyone look crazy in the 911 Truth movement.Scientists,military,architects
cadu1995 5 months ago
@cadu1995 Sepetember clues is not proof of no planes, you can take it in any context you see fit. I'm not a no planer but certainly believe in the use of tv fakery and that AA Flight 11 or UA Flight 175 were not the aircraft that hit the towers, just like AA Flight 77 didn't hit the pentagon. Something hit them, just not them. Its not very civilised to go about calling people names. Anymore of it and you will be blocked from commenting.
TheRangersLegend 5 months ago 2
@TheRangersLegend certainly believe in the use of tv fakery and that AA Flight 11 or UA Flight 175 were not the aircraft that hit the towers- if you are of the opinion that Miltary planes hit the tower then thats one thing.I do also.But it wasn't done thru TV fakery at all.
But everyone that subscribs to september clues believe there were NO PLANES.That's where they got the No-Planers from.
And who exactly did i call names? YOU? Anyone else here? I really don't give a shit what you do.
cadu1995 5 months ago
@cadu1995 Not everyone who supports this film is no planers. A quick read through the comments will confirm this. I don't care who your comments were directed at and you spammed up my channel and one of my unrelated videos with the same nonsense. True truthseekers will debate and keep an open mind, not call people who don't share their viewpoint retarded morons. Leave the sheeple who believe the mainstream to the name calling.
TheRangersLegend 5 months ago
@cadu1995 you can always tell cause they censor their comments too. People who inhibit free dialogue don't want truth tellers to be able to disseminate the truth without their control.
gtechie 5 months ago
@breathebliss... I get your question, but ask yourself that? Hopkins International Airport in Cleveland Ohio, the Mayor, local radio stations, and the airport reported that flight 93 landed at 10:06am and unloaded 200 people into a NASA building at the back of the airport. At the same time there was a bomb threat and the airport was evacuated. Flight 93 and flight 11 were not even on the list to fly that day.. So to answer your question, they are gone, just not from the planes
thekurtmagirt 5 months ago
as of 13:18
this is just unexplainable
kobesaa 5 months ago
1.28.05?
tsuchiya999 5 months ago
Then what about the people who died on the planes??
And their families??
breathebliss 5 months ago
@breathebliss
go to septemberclues.info
and go to the memorial section, it explains in detail about those people..
SteveFusionX 5 months ago
F4 Phantom Jet flying into a steel-concrete wall with 500mph (WTC Boeing Speed) -> PLANE COMPLETELTY DESTROYED!
watch?v=4q35xHzjxB0
Compare to:
Google Pics - WTC STRUCTURE + watch?v=wRf5pCj2XS8
Painted Second Life Plane in slow motion melting into WTC like butter - healing itself and exploding inside? Never...
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
I was in the fourth grade. My teacher turned this on after she heard about what happened. I noticed the fade to black at the moment of impact and could tell something was wrong with the entire situation. It generally just didn't look right. I was in the fourth grade. I knew, and still know what is going on.
icepic08 5 months ago
@icepic08
then there may be hope for our species yet.
The problem is the majority are still fast asleep in the "matrix", 10 years after this hoax.
SteveFusionX 5 months ago
oh no i mean it`s 12:15
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
the woman who is filming + another women say - OMG IT WAS A MILITARY PLANE!!! they cut out the hit of the 2nd plane + wtc crash but forgot about that...
watch?v=wNNTcHq5Tzk
2:15
and i think between 7:40-8:00 you can see the controlled demolition on the front tower..
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
in psychology
- when you look up to the right - it means that the person is constructing something or planning something.
- when you look down to the left - it means that you visual remember something -> you see pictures in your mind you have seen before.
so i wonder why Mike Walters is always looking down to the right...
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
omg this "september clue" video is amazing and it is a shame that only 31.100 people have watched it.
i think "September Clue" and "Zero an Investigation Into 9/11" are the two best documentary videos here on YT.
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
I think this is the former "Operation Northwoods" the Pentagon planned 50 years ago.
Here is a CNN Video where you can see the fake 2nd plane and the real one...? that didn`t hit the WTC (at 1:36)
watch?v=JRv60iCu2aI&feature=channel_video_title
and here is a never before seen Video from the ...plane... hit the Pentagon => filmed by a helicopter or so...not the video which was released to the media.
watch?v=o3VfZnVJFDQ&feature=channel_video_title
maybe you like to watch it.
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
@SuperYesyesyo Yeah seen both those videos but the latter of an apparent missile hitting the pentagon is clearly faked as its not stabilised to the backround and its trajectory is not consistent with the damage caused to the building. I'm not saying a missile didn't hit the pentagon as i'm fairly confident one did but that video is not proof of it.
TheRangersLegend 5 months ago
I eventually stopped watching this after bout an hour. How can anyone dispute that planes hit the twin towers. Hundreds of people gathered in the streets watched the events unfold before their very eyes!! I've been watching alot of vids/docs about 9/11 recently, some official (from major networks) and some from the conspiracy angle. The more I watch the stronger my feelings are that this was a an inside job and major cover up, too many unanswered questions, clutching at straws with this vid.
wsp1980 5 months ago
I don't believe that nothing hit them...it is questionable whether it was indeed Flight 11 and 175 though....I agree....
Glenmead 5 months ago
@Glenmead
something struck the towers (missile/drone/whatever) septemberclues does not dispute that fact.
SteveFusionX 5 months ago
I have seen interviews with firmen who witnessed planes hit LIVE...How do you explain that?
Glenmead 5 months ago
@Glenmead well I do not believe in the no planes theory but also do not believe the towers were struck by AA Flight 11 or UA Flight 175 so my explenation to your question would be that the firemen you speak of seen aircraft of some sort, a drone, and have mistaken it for commercial flights. I could imagine how difficult it would be to identify what they were form ground level travelling at speed.
TheRangersLegend 5 months ago
18:00 Mike Walter...Physics lesson...which is it? it can or it cant penetrate concrete? It went THROUGH the WTC, but disentigrated at pentagon?
rono8582 6 months ago
why did it stop @ 1:22:50????
bandanamaniac 6 months ago
@bandanamaniac it doesn't mate.
TheRangersLegend 6 months ago
@TheRangersLegend ....it did it to me....mate.
bandanamaniac 6 months ago
@bandanamaniac it runs to 1:33:44
TheRangersLegend 6 months ago
Poor evidence. At 11:58, the creator suggests that the two were shot at the same angle, when they obviously were not. If they were, the horizons would be the same. On the left you can see the city while on the right you see only sky. The right one was obviously shot from a lower perspective, so the plane also appears lower. Critical thinking fail. Also, there are countless photos of the second plane taken by non media sources, so this digital plane theory is nonsense.
crestind 6 months ago
@crestind Can we see some of these countless images taken by non media sources?
TheRangersLegend 6 months ago
@TheRangersLegend See =dr4BJ89Df5Q Again, the evidence presented in this video is ridiculous and demonstrates a lack of critical thinking. If the two videos are supposedly shot from the same perspective, why are the horizons different? Secondly, when you're standing between extremely tall buildings, your line of sight is limited. The plane is flying fast and is not going to hang around. There would only be a split second for anybody to see it.
crestind 6 months ago