Added: 3 years ago
From: ryancoke0
Views: 734,604
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (605)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the video is about the BODY KIT!! stop bitchin at him!

  • my integra with no slicks can pull harder than that lol, but then again its a 2150lbs car. this mustang looks really heavy to me, maybe he has passengers, a boost leak, and a retarded driver all together with possibly 460 CRANK horsepower not rear wheel hp

  • That shit slow as fuck!!!!

  • @younggrim19991992 Didnt it! Looks like something was holding it back.

  • im sry but that looks no where near 460, its like you hooked up the turbo's but not to the intake, either that or you weren't punching it

  • ....that car doesnt have 460rwhp....lol

  • LMAO! Whats this eleanor business?  Too funny.

  • Buttmounted weakness. Nice car,but why rearmount. Front mounts are not hard to build unless your unimaginative.

  • look up STS turbos out of Utah it explains alot

  • And.... That mustang doesn't have no 460 hp..especially at the rear wheels! i don't care what those turbos specs r.... ok, no more bustn.. nice car..

  • The worlds forst seventeen and a half second rear mounted turbo car.What a joke!!!!!!!

  • they r exhust turbos, EXHUST TURBOS!! WHY does everyone have to type down every BRAIN-FART they can think of??!!!!!!!...

  • kinda random, but thats not the right color, thats dead on silver, eleanor was a much darker shade, and not the right rims.

  • having the turbo in the back is becoming more popular because it is less work to just put it in place of the muffler than to possibly have to move things around in an already crowded engine bay as well as cut down on engine bay temperatures. you don't need to shield exhaust pipes like you would wires and plastic parts. more cost efficient and less heat stress in the engine bay

  • Sure TT looked a little slow

  • What do you mean with rear mounted twin turbo?

    And in my opinion turbo's dont go on american muscle

  • @NYCHC Haha, you obviously haven't seen Tim Lynch....

  • Dude, no offense but why did you mount the turbos in the rear? That is a VERY long ways for the air to travel.

  • ya bro blower time(whipple) piss on ur turbo!!!!!!!

  • wat people like this guy dont understand is.. if u dont have air flow.. your car is gonna run like shit.. putting twin turbos on with stock heads is a bad idea.. heads is 1 of the first things you do with a street rod/race car

  • @fourwheelerjock yea i have a turboed b18b with no vtec single turbo and even i knew that before i slapped it on, or at least a different intake manifold. now im making 412 hp to the front wheels on pump gas boosting 22 psi. remember people, i only got a 1.8 liter. if i had money to afford a 7 liter engine i would have 1500 horsepwer right now lol

  • @skullbasher23 i aint talking about your gay ass rice rockets

  • gay / slow

  • He boy behind the wheel was to affraid to wreck daddy's car.

    WHATCHA KNOW ABOUT SHIFTIN GEARS?!

  • oumaikat

    

  • looks very slow... well its a mustang.... You Ford guys don't get mad, just messing around with you folks..

  • What no wheels spin?

  • my Yugo 45 is faster :P

  • jesus christ that is one fucking ugly piece of shit car

  • is that a 2 litre?

  • rear turbos mean sts turbos, look them up, most people go with safe tuning only though 5-8 psi, thats enough to get an srt8 425hp to 520+hp however.

  • seems slow

  • does rear turbo mean turbo exhausts?

  • @cemsengul16 you, are fucking REtarded.

  • @cemsengul16 hey good question, good question....

  • @dadaboy69 Wow.......Im the farthest thing from a redneck, and My dad wasnt even 10 until the 80's, you arent just stupid.....sadly.

  • @dadaboy69 Retard who says retarded things and makes no intelligent contribution is a retard.

  • These newer mustangs look good, much better than the model before it

  • @iAmDeathSpank lol the 92 stang and the 2000's are ugly............

  • seems slow to me??

  • Comment removed

  • @deedundone Yeah your right, but that was implied, as with all cars claiming to be Eleanors. The only true eleanor is the one from the movie and we all already know that.

    But thanks for your imput. You seem very educated and wise.

  • @DavidDav7 Too bad you aren't lol its input man... Not imput hahahhaaha

  • @deedundone This is a newer style mustang that has the Cervini C500 body kit and exhaust system. The point of the Cervinis company its to recreate Eleanor in a newer mustang, notice the front grille, the hood, the rocker panels, the window louvers, the rear wing and rear valence. Its all a recreation of the classic 1967 Eleanor Fastback.

  • Comment removed

  • Check your facts. The original Eleanor was a 1973 Mach 1.

    @deedundone

  • Comment removed

  • @deedundone

    YOU said "the ONLY Eleanor is a restored or exact replica 1967 Shelby GT 500 :)"

    Check your previous comments so you don't fail next time, dumbass.

    Also you spelt Eleanor wrong so I thought I'd spell it for you. Use SPELL CHECK next time so you don't look like a even bigger dumbass than before. : D

  • @DerekSkater11 Why dont you shit the fuck up? You have no I-FUCKING-dea what you talking about? I wasnt even talking to a little skateboarding douche-bag!

  • Comment removed

  • Hey, no need for the language, sonny.  Are you five years old? The original Eleanor was a 1973 Mach 1. The 2000 film was a re-make. Google it. You should probably spell her name correctly, too. You're starting to make these folks think you're an idiot.

    @deedundone

  • Comment removed

  • cool that looks more like someone took a new plastic hot wheels and tried to make it into a classic car

  • @brandyn420420 AMEN!

  • ELEANOR IS A 67

  • @88matthardysucks or if you watched the original, its a yellow 73 mach 1

  • @88matthardysucks Most of us understand this but the owner of the Mustang decided to name is car the same name as the 67".

  • @88matthardysucks actually ELEANOR is a 73...

  • @929crotchrocket yeah i know but i like the newer movie more. the 67 mustang is my favorite body style

  • @88matthardysucks yea i love the 67 fastback... along with the 69 429... gotta love classics

  • @88matthardysucks she had kids thought..lol

  • Lol

  • @gone911helloWRX I own a Skyline R33 GTS I should call it a GTR because it has two turbos 470 horsepower No V-Spec I dont have the extra 25 grande for that lol....it would make quick work of this stang lol

  • @Glazeman11 Coolstorybro

  • that looked pretty slow man. tho sts kits dont make a lot of power

  • @blackjacksmitty ACTUALLY. youre wrong. the original Eleanor was a 1967 shelby gt500. lol. its my dream car, and i would kill a family of 4 to own it.

  • @blackjackssmitty how bout a family of 5

  • @blackjacksmitty how bout a family of 5

  • @slidewaysmiata Lol you quoted the wrong person, but yes, even a family of 5 :)

  • what are the side pipes on that. what kind of exhuast system is it?

  • Wow, there's a lot of professional drag racers commenting here!!!

  • @RXhardstyle your ugly. reguardless of the preformance, turbos are hideous. if superchrgers are such shit nd do so much damage to the car then why are GT500s supercharged, or hell even the ZR1, wich out runs any other production v8 twin turbo in the standing mile, and on the track. please stand up. just so i can tell your ass to sit back down.

  • @SirProStatus

    2 mny wrds

  • it is not eleanor ! u are so stupid .. USA guys didn't know anythigh about cars history ..

  • yall are fuckin idiots theres a beast under that hood

  • Sound is as fake as a hooker's smile...

  • I hate how everyone calls turbo's chinky. 

  • wow for supposedly 460hp looks slower than shit. And dude cant drive for shit either..

  • @maxredgizmo That's because of turbo lag. A rear mounted twin turbo will have LOTS of lag.

  • Keep Clicking 0:15

  • illusion69 - you're dumb as shit. do you even know what a turbo is or does?

    all those who think it wasnt fast - THATS BECAUSE IT WASNT FAST! THINK ABOUT IT, MAYBE HE WASNT FULL ON THE THROTTLE. buncha wannabe know-it-alls shut the fuck up

  • fuck this turbo shit. this is a muscle car, not some chinky 4 banger honda accord. supercharge that shit. 

  • @SirProStatus lol what a dumb shit you are hahahahaha. yeh lets supercharge the car so that the forced induction part of the engine has a parasitic effect on the engine instead of boosting the cars performance outright. fucking redneck

  • rear mounted turbos are a joke, especially the sts ones. instead of trying to make 8 psi in just 5 feet of piping you now have to make that much psi in 15 feet of piping. turbos have to spool alot hard and takes alot longer to make max boost

  • Didn't even bark the tires. Wow

  • heavy car wasteeeeee

  • disgrace nigga. my v6 4 litre ranger can hang with that. all its got is a walmart brand airfilter. HAHA

  • @dirtox4 yeah, ok.. though I agree that it was a dissapointment to watch

  • nice sound ill give it that.

  • SHHITTTSS WEAAK

  • thing is nice but slow

  • I think he has one of those whistle tips...... Pretty sure my camry DD would keep up with you.....

  • thats not eleanor, the '67 gt500 was eleanor

  • @Cmpnioncube so true!!

  • @Cmpnioncube no the Gt500 that was gone in 60 seconds is eleanor..

    i fucking hate all these knockoffs.. yeah ok you like the style... thats cool... dont make a clone 20 trillion times...

  • Nice shifts, want my grandma to drive and you hold the camera?

  • @RacingRocks12 i was saying the same thing

  • @RacingRocks12 looks like he was shifting fine to me...

  • @RacingRocks12 Shifts seem solid. Not firm enough for you or what?

  • @DavidDav7 Really.... Vroooooooomm -over rev- -Drop gear finally- vroooooommmm -same thing, no wheel chirp- Yea, Solid is not killing the clutch or running the RPMS high and even letting the nose dive, no good.

  • @RacingRocks12 check out his other video, he's probably the same age as your gramma and plowed her

  • widescreen to fullscreen... thought it was a truck but i knew elanor was a gt500... sounds nice but i just don't like mustangs, never the less wicked car

  • eleanor was like a pepper gray kind of color not silver. not knockin the car but you cant call it an eleanor

  • eleanor was not silver. FAIL! watch the movie again.

  • im hoping this wasnt full throttle....just enough to spool them turbos

  • this video is played in slo mo so u can actually enjoy looking at the car... LOL

    but i just love mustangs... love that sound..

  • this is not elanor

  • Looked pretty slow for a twin turbo V8.

  • Put your panties back on Eleanor!

  • you should be ashamed of yourself this is absolutely disgusting putting hair dryers into such a sexy car you should hand over the keys and drive some japanese import piece of plastic

  • @xc351v lol ure poor i can tell. your life will always suck like this.

  • @garmool ok coz me saying that turbos are shit makes me poor well done you retard

  • built for drgging i would imagine, with all the wieght over the rear wheels, the reason for the turbos is to even out the power band to help reduce wheel spin. i doubt they have done a custom map so there is potential to extract much more power than with a supercharger, and doing a rear mount conversion is expensive if you want quality, all in all i think this is a good effort

  • twin turbos are ehhh...big blocks r way better in those cars...espically uscle cars

  • @Yarddawg317th Whos to say its not running a V8 with two turbos? Never knew you couldn't run a big block with TT's. /sarcasm

  • my grandmas pinto will take that piece of shit

  • 460hp? My brothers racecraft mustang came out of the assembly line pushing 420. The gt500 had almost 500hp. You take off the supercharger to put twin turbos in just to produce less hp? Waste of money if you ask me.

  • Do a search for rear mount turbo drag car

  • I've seen some unbelieveably fast rear turbo drag cars. It's all in the set-up. The tech is out there. The old saying goes... Speed costs money. How fast do you want to go?

  • i bet he gets better runs in his shorts

  • the camera angle and zooming can make fast look slow. my buddy recorded me flying by him at over 130 and it looked like i was going like 80 lol.  i'm sure this car hauls ass.. let's face it, it's a v8 with 2 turbos....

  • WEAK

  • great googly-moogly

  • rear turbos sound sick but they DO NOT produce much power..stii this is a nice looking and nice sounding car..STB

  • @SouthTexasBully shit! rear mount turbos are just as good as any turbo out there, its just where you want to put it,and if you have room. do some research.

  • @crawlin82 TOO MUCH LAG AND DISCONNECTION FROM THE GAS PEDAL..Rear mount turbos are not near as efficient as other turbo setups.they do sound nice though but they havent produced the #'s that other turbos have produced.STB

  • gay

  • *mpg

  • bahh sweet car.. a friend of mine gets 28+ mph with his sts kit..

  • U almost caught up to that other car

  • mustangs hae terrible transmissions thes why the newer mustangs and camaros are slow there transmissions are not setup for there power. Best power to transmission is the corvette Z06 0-60 in 3.7 sec that mustang has power but bad tranny

  • i heard that bitch suck some air! holy shit

  • The four fog lights make this car look ricey. Sad.

  • YOU CANT DRIVE FOR SHIIT. U SUCK DONKEY DICK AT SHIFTING LEARN TO PUNCH GEARS BEFOR U POST HOMO SHIT

  • Umm. The 10-11 mustang will easily hang on a track with any import in it's class.  Corvette has already proven itself as far as track racing. Not to mention the old muscle cars built for dragging which was and American pastime. That what all the Lil yuppies say "only in a strait line can ur muscle cars beat imports.". Not true any more buddy. European performance has been combined with American horsepower.

  • couldnt call it a gt500 could you lol and put eleanor in quotes just sayin lol

  • Mustang, Camaro, Challenger, Couda Corvette,Pontiac Trans Am etc. These are muscle cars, icons and right now the classics are selling for just as much as European exotics. American muscle baby anything else is basically a high-priced Volkswagen (still love porsche). This mustang when tuned can hang with if not whip the snot out of any European car in it's class.

  • @2009kdizzle i would love to see you take any of those muscle cars on a track that dose not consist of one straight line. HA!

  • How bad does it suck that my audi s4 would walk all over you hunk of ford?

  • Québec?

  • Dude my 2011 5.0 mustang is making only 25hp less and it's N/A.. K&N drop in, tune and X-pipe, thats all i got. Check out my vid of me racing my friends Kawi 600. And like my last comment.. That 's sad only making 460, my car TT on only 6psi would make over 600hp!!!

  • @96jdmek2dr You're comparing crank and wheel hp. 460whp = ~530 bhp.

  • How do you like the twin turbo setup from sts? I've been thinking of getting it myself but want some firsthand feedback first.

  • looked and sounded weak. but i love the car nonetheless. however ill take the real (well, the real is yellow but you know what i mean) eleanor haha

  • niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii­iiiiiice :D

  • i clicked on this all excited thinking i was about to see a badass mustang.. but the tires didnt even break loose?

  • Why is this video in slow motion?

  • @xy274 bahahahah....i was thinking the same thing.

  • Why are you idiots saying it isn't fast? The guy is just cruising through three gears, for the purpose of an exhaust/drive-by video. Not a drag race.

    He launched soft, isn't revving much more than 3.5K, and you guys assume that he's going pedal to the metal? That's your basis for saying that a 460 RWHP car is slow? I almost give up with you daft minded Youtube mechanics. Quit with the jealousy, really.

  • @kcole939 lol so very true you can tell that he isn't dogging on it and shifting painfully slow before 4k rpms

  • @kcole939 your right he isnt even trying. whats the point in lissenin to those trolls

  • Something is not right with this car. My stock 2010 GT is faster. This thing is a donkey.

  • not a twin turbo

  • @nathanisgayful wrong. STS turbo's

  • you can really hear that turbo whistle, sick mustang.

  • That was a disgrace to the ford community. It had to be human error.

  • wtf is with the turbo this baby should be supercharged makes me quite sick to hear the turbo in such a sexy car

  • slow. my honda would rape this and no im not kidding.

  • shit

  • now forgive me if im wrong.... but that does seem abit slow. i own an eclipse gst...... and at full throttle im breaking loose..... now with this car.... at not even half throttle i should see some wheel spin....

  • Dude I have a yz 80 that will beat that horse in to a pony !

  • Didnt look fast at all, not being a douche or anything just honestly didnt look any faster than a stock gt....

  • @Camaromandave98 i totally agree

  • @Camaromandave98 lol that because it is actual a little slower now since it isn't twin turbo and is heavier now that he put all that body work on.

  • Wow

  • Well at least that kinda looked fast I guess...

  • man listen to those turbos spool up

  • that was gay

  • couldnt have been WOT........

  • impresiv - you don't know what you're talking about

    

  • @ryancoke0 maybe not, but Kenne Bell sure does. check out their website.  they have it clearly advertised on their site.

  • watch in high quality fail

  • haha that looked so slow but sounded like it was doing 200mph! lmao

  • @RanDmHero960 Lol those are mustangs for ya! 

  • The car did not fail. It's pretty.

  • this car failed

  • I don't think any of you enjoy cars. I think you just wanna fight over penis size on the internet.

  • heard the rubo windind up before i even heard the exhaust. looks like a fun car to drive. good job.

  • SLOW

  • That's FORD power, twin turbo and only putting out 460... How sad.. LOL