Crazy ski cliff jump Canada 60 foot

[MrssPotatoDick]

id say more like 33.634777 feet if you do the conversion from metres to feet correctly

[thewhistlerkid]

it's about forty feet, it's hard to get the guts to go off it once you're on top of it

[fallout3modable]

definently not 60 more like 30 35

[nickjclfs]

ye the water fall is 30 tops jordan is more like 60

[iiTzBawss]

its 40 feet actually

[DontBeANerdyGeek]

you fail!

[iiTzBawss]

@DontBeANerdyGeek WHY DONT YOU DO IT FUCKING IDIOT

[cashmab]

Looks like 40-45 ft. Assuming the dude is 6' high, I count about 7 dude heights from takeoff point to landing point.

[Skoojoo]

You guys, 60 feet is a lot smaller than you think

[klabatte]

that was no more than 30 , good try though

[powderskiing425]

@magicxxxman yeah still maybe only 40 then not 60

[maxthefactor]

just to clarify im a whistler local. its called `the waterfall` and its 40 ft. still impressive though

[nichasssinger]

HA! your funny flusher20211 I dont care if it is 15ft! you still couldnt and better yet wouldnt do it!

[mountainkid7669]

Want to see a real 60 footer?? Check out my vids of Domanski's which is only aprox 500ft further down the ridge from the Waterfall.

[flusher20211]

that is not 60 feet, more like 30 feet

[DswitchupzU]

my friend cheech has gone the deepest ive ever seen anyone go off waterfall.

[hemmygrant]

put up your videos SHIT TALKERS HAHAHAHAHHAHAH

[00xooxoox00]

ive been to that cliff ppl also call it the falls and shincracker. theres also another 20 foot cliff near it but i forget the name.

[suggie27]

Ive hit that, its in Whistler. If you go allong peak chair there's bigger and better drops. Nice one though.

[UnofficialSquaw]

60 Feet my ass.

But if you had fun doing it it dont matter how big it was

[Jibber0013]

its 35-40 feet over the waterfall depending upon how far down the hill you land

[IveGotTheNuts]

No doubt that cliff is perfectly like sweet fun no fear there. Come do Zebos or Taylors and then you can say wow.. Only on a good year can you even do em. That look slike fun that air just a regular little drop along the way.

[hdcbhdcb]

you suck some serious dick ivegotthenuts

[chesteriest]

need to get in the habit of stomping that...

[corporal8448]

Nah thats the Waterfall across from the base of the peak chair for sure. 60 feet looks like a bit of an exaggeration, but nice effort all the same.

[inyourface23]

Ride a bike, it is way better! lol - nice drop, I like skiing

[joelbettner]

its not 60 feet. its not small, but it isn't 60 feet.  i'd probably put it somewhere around 40 or so.

don't forget that he has significant wind resistance with his skis, so it wouldn't be high school physics, it'd be diff eq.

i'm honestly not trying to be a dick, because it really is a pretty sweet shot...i'm just sayin. keep shreddin.

[Chopin742]

Wind resistance increases with the square of velocity and that is only relevant going downwards, so for the first second wind resistance would have only a small effect.

[mafrantias]

sorry that was my buddy on my youtube account making rude comments, ignore his comments! keep hucking!

[mafrantias]

good math though, i cant argue with that, pretty funny... 60 feet it is

[couloir46]

High school physics buddy. s = ut +1/2 at^2

Therefore, if t = 2 second

s = 0 x 2 + 0.5 * (9.8m/s)(2)^2 = 0.5 * 9.8 *4 = 19.6 metres = 60 feet.

Got a stop watch ?

[pipelinemasta43]

i give u credit for tryen tht....nice math lol

[thedudewhorocks]

@couloir46 I know you wish you were that badass, but its not 60 ft bro. the timing is not accurate enough to tell. keep dreaming but its 45 ft at the max. nice landing by the way